Headlines

  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Cubs Hire Craig Breslow As Director Of Strategic Initiatives For Baseball Operations

By Steve Adams | January 14, 2019 at 10:24am CDT

The Cubs announced Monday that they’ve named former big league reliever Craig Breslow director of strategic initiatives in their baseball operations department. That, it seems, will put an end to a playing career that dates all the way back to the 2002 season for the 38-year-old Breslow, who spent the 2018 campaign pitching in the Blue Jays’ minor league ranks.

Per the Cubs’ release, Breslow “will help to evaluate and implement data-based processes throughout all facets of Baseball Operations” and will also “support the organization’s pitching infrastructure in Player Development and the major leagues.”

A Yale graduate with a degree in molecular biophysics and biochemistry, Breslow has long been heralded as one of the game’s brightest minds. The lefty spent parts of 12 seasons in the Major Leagues, pitching to a combined 3.45 ERA with 442 strikeouts against 226 walks in 570 2/3 innings. That body of work was spread out over seven organizations, including the Red Sox, Twins, Athletics, Indians, D-backs, Padres and Marlins.

Breslow enjoyed what was arguably his most successful season in the big leagues with the Red Sox back in 2013, when he tossed 59 2/3 innings of 1.81 ERA ball for the eventual World Series champions. That season marked Breslow’s lone year of postseason experience, assuredly making the ring he won all the more treasured.

Few, if any, can match Breslow’s combination of education and a playing career that spanned more than a decade and a half, so he’ll being a unique blend of skills and experience to a Cubs front office that is already regarded among the game’s most progressive groups. Best of luck to Breslow in the next chapter of his baseball journey.

Share 0 Retweet 24 Send via email0

Chicago Cubs Craig Breslow Retirement

NL East Rumors: Rendon, deGrom, Straily
Main
Giants Re-Sign Derek Holland
View Comments (85)
Post a Comment

85 Comments

  1. FutureMiLBWife

    6 years ago

    Congratulations to him (: but i surely think they are just making up job titles now haha

    7
    Reply
    • marshmallowman

      6 years ago

      i’m just hoping utley gets the assistant to the regional GM position in philly one day

      3
      Reply
      • layventsky

        6 years ago

        Klentak should hire him as AGM just so he can say “Assistant TO the General Manager.”

        3
        Reply
  2. southern lion

    6 years ago

    Brainiac should help the Pale Hose be a better team.

    1
    Reply
    • deweybelongsinthehall

      6 years ago

      Wrong Chicago team.

      1
      Reply
    • thisredsoxfan

      6 years ago

      The Cubs hired him not the White Sox!

      Reply
    • axisofhonor25

      6 years ago

      Wrong Chicago team, but the White Sox do have a brainiac in their organization by the name of Chris Getz, director of player development. He’s done some good things in helping develop the minor league talent.

      Reply
      • The Human Toilet

        6 years ago

        Moncada has been amazing so far

        Reply
        • MrStealYoBase

          6 years ago

          He spent like 3 months in the Sox farm

          Reply
  3. Art Fay

    6 years ago

    The Cubs have one of baseball’s most progressive front offices? Can anybody in “the know” cite some evidence?

    All I see is a super rich team that tanked despite having huge financial resources and then spent over half a billion dollars to win a World Series. Now it looks like those prospects are mostly busts and they have an aging pitching staff that costs more ($130M) than most entire payrolls. All they’ve done is spend more than anybody else since 2015. What am I missing?

    I’m an A’s fan so I’m not biased against the cubs. I just don’t see “progressive” in the body of work. BTW, super happy for Breslow. Good guy to root for.

    10
    Reply
    • sufferforsnakes

      6 years ago

      Progressive doesn’t necessarily mean smart.

      5
      Reply
      • wrigleywannabe

        6 years ago

        I’m guessing you work with Flo.

        Reply
      • Djones246890

        6 years ago

        True. In today’s world “Progressive” means “moron.” If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Not everything has to “progress.”

        Reply
    • Bryzzo2016

      6 years ago

      Hmmm, busts? Hahaha, KB won College Player of the year, the next year – MiLB player of the year, the next year MLB ROY, the next year MVP and won a ring. Almora, already graduated to the big club, won a ring… was key in game 7. Schwarber, again graduated to the big club and was key in the WS win, Happ… (see a theme here) graduated to the big club and won a ring. Soooo those are Theo’s 1st round picks since he got here. Zero busts, all key MAJOR LEAGUE contributors. What other team has successfully graduated ALL their 1st round picks in that time span? Exactly

      4
      Reply
      • stan lee the manly

        6 years ago

        That’s not really a fair comment because a lot of teams weren’t losing every season to draft at the very top of the first round time and time again. There was a lot less risk with the players the Cubs took because they had higher-quality players available to them than most of the other major league teams picking lower in the first rounds.

        6
        Reply
        • wrigleywannabe

          6 years ago

          That’s how it works.

          They hit far more than other teams and the guy said they were mostly busts.

          It’s fair.

          2
          Reply
        • iceman35pilot

          6 years ago

          The Cubs won more games every year from 2012 when Theo took over up through 2016.

          1
          Reply
      • Art Fay

        6 years ago

        Hey man, I wasn’t trying to insult you personally. Sorry if I did. I personally think Schwarber, Almora, Russell & Happ are closer to BUSTS than ALL-STARS at the moment. All four of those guys have pretty much zero trade value.

        Drafting Bryant was not smart- it was a no-brainer. I’m sure 28 other teams wished they tanked and were picking at No. 2 that year.

        The irony of it all is that when it’s all said and done, the best guys on the team might end up coming from Jim Hendry, the previous GM (Contreras & Baez).

        All they’ve really done is outspend every other team. It’s not that impressive. And now they are about to be in a serious jam because of it.

        7
        Reply
        • adkuchan

          6 years ago

          “closer to BUSTS than ALL-STARS” Not hardly. Only about 65% of 1st round picks ever don a MLB uniform. Guys who find themselves consistently in the lineup, especially for a playoff team, are FAR from busts.

          You are also missing several trades the team made to build its current roster. Andrew Cashner for Anthony Rizzo. Scott Feldman for Jake Arietta and Pedro Strop. Ryan Dempster for Kyle Hendricks.

          I am not sure what “serious jam” you are referring to. They won’t have trouble keeping the guys they want to keep. They are in line for a HUGE TV deal after this season, and renovations in and around Wrigley field are nearly completed. These will open up vast new revenue streams for the team.

          3
          Reply
        • wrigleywannabe

          6 years ago

          So, now if you aren’t an All Star you’re a bust?

          You said most of them were bust, not 4.

          Teams constantly ask about Schwarber, just stop.

          Number 2 guys bust all the time. Other teams do what they did.

          It’s a way to get better. You still have to hit on the picks.

          There are other teams with higher payrolls.

          Lester, Darvish and Heyward are the hig money guys, they outbid people on. Zo is on a decent contract

          Other guys were drafted or traded for, with drafted guys like Cease, Jimenez and Torres. Again, just stop.

          I do apologize for misunderstanding your original tanked remark. Unfortunately, some people claim they floundered last year.

          By the way,they’re not in a jam.

          Zo and Hamels are gone after this year. Lester follows. Money is there.

          3
          Reply
        • mga2q7

          6 years ago

          Schwarber, Almora & Happ have no trade value? You must be joking or blinded by bias. How are contributing pieces of an annually competitive team considered anywhere close to busts? They dont have to be all stars to successful picks.

          3
          Reply
        • mistry gm

          6 years ago

          yah right, that’s why every team in both leagues wants Schwarber. Almora will be great this year and without major health problems they will have one of the top rotations in baseball. my guess is that WITHOUT Harper, 102 wins. Try actually watching them this year

          1
          Reply
        • megaj

          6 years ago

          If you actually think Kyle Schwarber has “zero” trade value, you have absolutely no freaking clue about anything MLB related and should probably just refrain from posting again. Just about EVERY team would love to get Schwarber. Even the Yankees have tried the last couple of seasons and they have a loaded outfield already. His biggest problem is how he has been coached the last two seasons. First he is asked to leadoff, then they bench him every other day, then they won’t let him face lefties. Give the guy 500 + at bats, and you can pencil in 30+ homers, and an .800+ OPS EVERY year. Oh yeah, and a common misconception is that he sucks on defense. He only had 1 error in the field ALL of last year with 11 assists, and he keeps getting better.

          1
          Reply
    • wrigleywannabe

      6 years ago

      They are talking about analytical use of data.

      95 wins is tanking? You’re an idiot.

      Baez is not a bust. Bryant and Contreras are not. Schwarber is not. Hendricks is not. Almora is not. Jiminez, now gone, looks great, as does Cease.

      Who are these MOSTLY busts? Happ and Russell?

      I’d wait a year on Happ, but I’d give you Russell, right now.

      That’s hardly most of them. They were not all expected to he stars.

      Heck, Rizzo was a struggling prospect when they got him.

      Strop and Arrieta had their careers saved by the Cubs.

      Can’t forget Rondon.

      It’s not all drafting, which they’re fine at.

      Heck, the biggest bust was the guy drafted by Oakland.

      Look, they’ve hit onnguys from other teams and before the completion of this front office.

      Some ofvthose carriedcover and developed. That shows how goid the organization is

      Reply
      • cards81

        6 years ago

        Lol he wasn’t talking about when the cubs finally stopped tanking and started winning…the guy makes very good points..it’s easy to draft from the top and have success…the cardinals do way better at drafting than most and certainly better than the cubs…the cardinals are a very progressive team…most teams have copied MOs model of developing players and using the farm…the Red Sox…Yankees…dodgers have all started doing what the cardinals have been doing for years

        3
        Reply
        • mga2q7

          6 years ago

          What? Cheating by hacking into other team’s resources?

          1
          Reply
        • cards81

          6 years ago

          Lol I’m not getting into that…everyone knows it was one person..and the cardinals didn’t gain anything from it…good try though

          1
          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          If you think Chris Correa acted “on his own”, then I have some land in Times Beach to sell you. He took the fall and kept his mouth shut. I’m guessing there is an offshore account with 7 figures deposited in it for him when he gets out.

          1
          Reply
        • cards81

          6 years ago

          Dave shut up…stay off my post…troll somewhere else bud

          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          Cards81, it might be time for you to find somewhere else to post if you don’t like others to comment.. I’ll stay right here.

          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          It is amusing.. I guess some of us aren’t entitled to an opinion?

          Reply
        • theoepsteinhof

          6 years ago

          Hilarious that a Cards fan is a Cub commenter accusing others of “trolling” him! Lmao for the sad redbird fan.

          1
          Reply
        • cards81

          6 years ago

          First if you understood this guy Dave then you would know why I said that…second do you guys really come on here just to call others names? I mean really grow up…I’m guessing your pretty immature especially using the term “St. Loser”and “red turd…had to reach deep to pull those out huh… how original lol grow up

          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          I’m trying to figure out where I called you a “name”

          Reply
        • Bryzzo2016

          6 years ago

          Gotta love the irony. Anyway, MANY have tried what the Cubs/Astros have done, VERY few succeeded. Theo also did it in Boston, in fact, much of the core that just won in Boston are courtesy of Theo.

          Reply
        • cards81

          6 years ago

          Well the braves seem to be doing a good job of it…San Diego sounds like they are doing a pretty good job…I’m not saying what they did, tank, wasn’t a good idea…it was a great idea…very true about Theo…his last draft class for the Red Sox are a lot of the stars on the Red Sox…although he didn’t develop them…and also Luhnow was a protege of Mo before moving on to Houston

          Reply
        • cards81

          6 years ago

          Also…Dave I wasn’t talking about you…how do you not see that…geez Dave

          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          Luhnow was NOT a protege of Mozeliak. Good Lord! He was brought in 2003 under Jocketty’s watch, then ran circles around Mo so much that Mo instructed Correa to hack into Luhnow’s computer. Protege? Far from it.

          Reply
        • cards81

          6 years ago

          Really lol that is so not true…you need to give Mo some credit…he is the reason cardinals draft so well

          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          It’s absolutely true. I wouldn’t expect you to understand.

          Reply
    • theoepsteinhof

      6 years ago

      Lmao at people who think the Cubs tanked. You have to be good first before you can tank! They struggled for decades so “tanking” was their regular M.O.! They had high draft picks for decades and consistently failed! What they did was get someone who built a front office full of excellent evaluators, thus the great picks from ‘11 thru ‘16.
      Due to poor management and acting as a Tribune Co. pawn, Cubs never had the resources to use as they did when Ricketts finally hired Epstein.
      Stop trying to tear down success. The A’s have had theirs and still do have one of those “progressive” FO that you don’t understand the value of.

      1
      Reply
      • cards81

        6 years ago

        They tanked dude…there is no way around it…the cubs tanked

        3
        Reply
        • petrie000

          6 years ago

          No, they just stunk when Theo took over.

          Reply
        • theoepsteinhof

          6 years ago

          So the Cardinals have been tanking since ‘15? After all, their fall from the top of the division is more dramatic than the Cubs bouncing around the bottom all those years.

          2
          Reply
        • cards81

          6 years ago

          That makes zero sense? The Cardinals have had a winning record and has always competed till the end every year…good try…the never purposely put a bad team on the field to lose on purpose so they could have top draft picks…never once

          1
          Reply
        • Android Dawesome

          6 years ago

          Tanked is a made up word used by people with a low baseball IQ to try and sound smart.

          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          Yes the Cards do compete. It’s the term Mozeliak and Dewitt use every year. They don’t say, “build a team to win a WS”. They say, “we want to compete”.

          Reply
        • cards81

          6 years ago

          INFORMAL•US
          fail completely, especially at great financial cost.
          It’s not made up actually…and plus ask anyone in baseball…mlb tv will even tell you the cubs tanked…I guess they have low baseball IQ

          Reply
        • theoepsteinhof

          6 years ago

          Nor did the Cubs. They were historically bad year after year. How do you tank with that history?

          Reply
    • Cachhubguy

      6 years ago

      Haters gonna hate.

      1
      Reply
    • petrie000

      6 years ago

      With all the strange things you see, you have a bright future as an umpire….

      Reply
    • amishthunderak

      6 years ago

      Yeah, but they won the World Series.

      Reply
  4. jb226

    6 years ago

    Saw him on MLB Network a few weeks ago, very smart guy. If he can better translate some of the analytics coming out of the front office into something the players can understand and utilize based on being only a few months removed from playing, it should be a good hire regardless of the weird title.

    1
    Reply
    • petrie000

      6 years ago

      The biophysics degree should also help him find ways to translate the raw data into useable coaching or training techniques

      Reply
  5. Carrington Spensor

    6 years ago

    ……and so many of you wonder why franchise expenses keep going up resulting in players getting a smaller share of revenues.

    “Director of strategic initiatives”.

    ?

    Personnel flying all over the world looking for players. Computers everywhere – installation; maintenance; MBA’s querying data, etc. And front office advisers tripping over one another.

    The beauty of baseball is slowly ebbing away each year by over-educated people doing reverse engineering, along with ex-players playing mind-games – all dressed in casual clothing that cost more then hand-tailored suits and dropping ever-changing buzzwords which are now the credential.

    lol

    1
    Reply
    • davidcoonce74

      6 years ago

      Oh man. I bet you hated color TV and when the movies started talking too. Jeez, get off this absurd tilting at windmills.

      5
      Reply
      • TwinsTrio

        6 years ago

        But the rabbitt ears on top of the tv…. and the horizontal and vertical hold buttons…. you make me feel old !

        Reply
      • Carrington Spensor

        6 years ago

        davidcoonce74

        Actually stereotyper, I spent over 35 years working with computers from system development to management.

        I always hated the mystique so many created to make their positions appear far more important then they were.

        The excess in MLB’s use of “technology” long ago passed the sweet spot of ‘The Law of Diminishing Returns’. Currently it’s all about empire building.

        Reply
      • mike 96

        6 years ago

        cubs suck go atanta

        1
        Reply
        • wrigleywannabe

          6 years ago

          Learn to spell

          1
          Reply
        • HubcapDiamondStarHalo

          6 years ago

          And capitalize…

          2
          Reply
        • mistry gm

          6 years ago

          whether or not I agree with you, congratulations, you are a true fan , but … go Cubs.

          Reply
  6. davidcoonce74

    6 years ago

    Smart team hires smart guy to work in smart front office. News at 11. No, but seriously, always liked this guy; survived a reasonably decent amount of time with below-average stuff, probably helped that he understood biomechanics so well. I do remember watching him pitch, that he had a somewhat unorthodox delivery – he hid the ball well and it looked like it was coming out from behind his left ear; unlike a lot of lefty relievers, he was much more over the top. He also had a great pickoff move from what I recall. Good for him. He put up 7 WAR in his career, which is actually pretty good for a LOOGY and made 15 million dollars. And he was born on my birthday! (Same day, not same year)

    2
    Reply
  7. BobbyJohn

    6 years ago

    “A Yale graduate with a degree in molecular biophysics and biochemistry, Breslow has long been heralded as one of the game’s brightest minds.”

    Ya think?

    Reply
  8. abravesfan 2

    6 years ago

    Being a fellow Yale alum, I have read a few times the stories about Breslow thinking about using his molecular biology degree when his MLB career is over. I guess that’s apparently on hold still until after his baseball front office career. Then again, he’s been approaching his pitching scientifically in the late stages of his career using advanced stats.

    Reply
    • Carrington Spensor

      6 years ago

      I’m sorry,

      I surely respect a molecular biology degree from an Ivy League school.

      But the purpose in MLB?

      As a living-legend baseball-genius Mr. Epstein, has surrounded himself with advanced degreed collegians from the very best schools. OK. So explain how with all these resources, the Cubs gave astronomical contracts to Tyler Chatwood, Yu Darvish, and Jason Heyward. They were so bad that daddy (Tom Ricketts) had to take his allowance away. Perhaps Mr. Breslow will prevent these disastrous signings in the future.

      The thing is, I don’t have a graduate degree from an Ivy League school, yet I rolled my eyes at those contracts. Think I’m a second-guesser? I’d give Machado and Harper 4 years /$115m, with a team option for a fifth year at $30m. They may be All-Stats, but they’re hardly “superstars”. The contracts they’re going to get may not be as bad as the Cubs contracts are, but they’ll still handcuff their new teams FO faster then most will realize.

      1
      Reply
      • wrigleywannabe

        6 years ago

        Jealoys much?. None of
        those deals were out of line for the demand. The Cards offered more to Heyward.
        Their deals will be far worse even with every orher team employing the same type of guys.

        Reply
        • Carrington Spensor

          6 years ago

          Jealoys?

          lol

          Reply
        • HubcapDiamondStarHalo

          6 years ago

          Hey, there’s always room for jealoys.

          4
          Reply
  9. bobtillman

    6 years ago

    Fifteen years ago, Andrew Zimmerman, the prize winning economist from Amherst College, estimated that it cost about 50M to actually “run” a MLB team, independent of payroll. All the technological advancements SHOULD have brought those costs down; you don’t need switchboard operators anymore; you don’t need Minor League scouts, all you need is a $50 a year subscription to MiLB-TV. Etc., etc., etc.

    But teams now claim it costs 100M to run their teams. It boils down to paying your gobs of income to Uncle Sam, or hiring Craig Breslow, which of course is another “cost of sales”.

    That leads to all kinds of absurdities. The Rays chronically cry poor mouth, but just bought a soccer franchise. So you can’t pay your own mortgage, but you can buy another house. Oh……

    Ultimately the tragedy is that fans buy into it, which is kind of like being forced to buy the drugs that will be used in your lethal injection.

    The 2021 CBA negotiations are going to be incredibly ugly……

    2
    Reply
    • wrigleywannabe

      6 years ago

      You still need scouts

      1
      Reply
      • bobtillman

        6 years ago

        Amateur scouts, yes. But “pro scouts” have gone the way of the Hula Hoop. The Astros actually have virtually disbanded the department.

        And even amateur scouting has changed dramatically….more video, more “tournaments” where the prime prospects gather, etc. All of it doesn’t result in BIG savings; scouts were always notoriously underpaid, their travel expenses eating up most of the scouting budget. But it’s a cost that’s been severely rendered non-essential.

        1
        Reply
        • petrie000

          6 years ago

          No, they haven’t. Scouts are just as important in a sabermetric world as they were before, if not more so.

          The computers might tell the teams which players fit the profile they need, but then a scout has to go and actually look at the player and evaluate his future potential.

          The only thing about scouting that’s fundamentally different is the Scouts are no longer the ones ‘finding’ the guys. A good scout in today’s game is an incredibly valuable resource

          1
          Reply
        • Carrington Spensor

          6 years ago

          bob,

          What you’re missing is the costs of wiring up parks to make the videos. Then skilled people have to watch and/or program those videos.

          As you noted, scouts have always been underpaid. But skilled computer people and their hardware/software are not cheap. Additionally, like baseball and every other discipline, there are talented people and incompetent ones.

          The argument is that an organization may increase their budget by 1X, but they’re getting back 5X in quality.

          But I do agree that empires are being built for no reason. When you spend 5X to get information and it’s worth 1X to you, then there’s a problem.

          MLB has overdone technology. Still need experienced baseball people to analyze the data insofar as how it impacts baseball decisions.

          Reply
        • bobtillman

          6 years ago

          That they’re getting a “1X” return” on their investment is precisely my point. Let’s remember these owners aren’t dumb folks. In days past, some indeed were (inheritance, etc.). No reasonable business person is going to make that error. So that when they do so, there must be an alternative explanation.

          We’re still pretty much in the Dark Ages (well, most teams are) when it comes to using the new tech and metrics in a productive manner. You know as well as anyone (based on your work experience) that data by itself is just data, conclusive of nothing. It’s the understanding of the universe in which the data occurred that’s paramount. In many organizations, the new metrics are the shiny new toy that the 5 year old can’t figure out what it is.

          And I don’t curse the owners for making the money they’re making; God bless ’em, they rolled the dice and collected the pot. It just drives me nuts when fans are forced to accept poor product because of totally fictitious cries of poverty. Yes, there are income disparities in MLB, as there are everywhere. Your candy store in Podunck Iowa isn’t going to generate the same revenue as the same store in Times Square. But chances are pretty good you paid a lot less for the store in Podunck.

          But that’s simply not an excuse. Dropping back a year or two to “rebuild”? Sure, been going on for centuries, across all forms of sports (and business). But these 5-year rebuilding falsifications are just marketing ploys, nothing more. Simply a way to rob a fan whose probably paid for the venue in which he sits. But that’s another story.

          1
          Reply
      • User 4245925809

        6 years ago

        Was a time at MiLB games would see 1-2 every single game behind HP alone and sometimes several seated in stands in a cluster together. Those days are gone. Maybe 1..2 a game at most now tops.

        Either it’s all teams being cheap (my vote) or gone to video is the reason.

        Reply
    • Carrington Spensor

      6 years ago

      B I N G O

      Wow, bob!

      I believe Dave Dombrowsi recently said that when he was first a GM he had something like 45 people reporting to him. Now he has close to 500.

      There’s an old saying – lawyers flock to piles of money like flies flock to poop. Look at Washington, DC.

      MLB may be generating record revenues, but every year more and more goes out to ancillary people that make up jobs for themselves. Same as the bureaucracy in Washington, DC.

      Seriously, why does it take almost 500 people to support a 25-man roster, and maybe 150 players in the minors (less then when Dombrowski started)? And gobs of those people have backgrounds that have nothing at all to do with baseball.

      Reply
      • its_happening

        6 years ago

        It was only 45 because he worked for the Expos, and employees feared falling beams inside the Olympic Stadium offices. Or that they were the Expos.

        Cubs making up a job title to get this guy into the organization and maybe into the conference room when they have player personnel meetings.

        Seems like a lot of people owners have to pay a salary to. That means they better generate revenue. Do the math; that’s costly.

        Reply
        • Carrington Spensor

          6 years ago

          TrimReaper,

          Our Director once hired a physics major with an advanced degree from Cal Tech. He came from ‘The Jet Propulsion Laboratory’ They send rockets into space. He took over a department of 10-12 people that were ecstatic, telling me they were “going to learn so much”. Within 2-3 weeks the people were despondent. They had no idea what he was talking about, he had no idea what they dealt with daily.

          People generating revenue is not the issue. Paying me $100k a year and giving me a $50k budget for overhead and expenses is a losing proposition if I’m generating $40k a year in additional revenue. That’s what’s happening in MLB today. They have passed the apex of ‘The Law of Diminishing Returns’. This may go on for a while, but something will happen and the bottom will fall out (possibly the new CBA?). The smart money – a la JP Morgan – is happy with their profit and is selling here……..”leaving something for the next guy”. They may buy back in 10-15 years at a much lower cost.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          6 years ago

          Sorry Carrington, my last comment was mainly for the people on this site that seem to think the only cost of running a baseball team goes to the players. They do not seem to grasp the concept of having to take care of the people surrounding the organization from top to bottom, thus the 500 people comment regarding Dombrowski.

          As for the job situation….I can’t answer that. But for those wondering where some of the revenue is going, it would be in other areas beyond the 40-man roster.

          Every MLB team is looking for a edge, obviously. However, seems many are looking in the same direction. Certain teams have stubborn management, where they feel strongly about a philosophy that bites them every October. Without a desire to change their thinking the same result will occur, most likely.

          1
          Reply
  10. msqboxer

    6 years ago

    You can have all the analytics you want, but none of those guys try to square up a barrel of a bat to a 95mph fast ball. These guys are SCOUTS….analyst of this or that just sounds better.

    Reply
    • refereemn77

      6 years ago

      This guy was a serviceable pitcher and is known by many as the smartest man in baseball. He’d be a great addition to any FO.

      Reply
  11. Priggs89

    6 years ago

    Good hire. Maybe Theo will finally be able to draft and develop a starting pitcher.

    Reply
  12. Konerko 4 Prez

    6 years ago

    Why is this story tagged to the White Sox page?

    Reply
  13. sjsoder

    6 years ago

    What kind of ring did Ian Happ win, because it wasn’t a World Series ring.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    The Astros Are (Again) Not Getting Much From A Pricey First Base Signing

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    Royals Outright Thomas Hatch

    Diamondbacks Place Kendall Graveman On 15-Day IL

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Guardians’ Will Brennan, Andrew Walters Undergo Season-Ending Surgeries

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Nats Notes: Nuñez, Chapparo, Williams

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version