Headlines

  • Astros Agree To Two-Year Deal With Jason Castro
  • Astros To Re-Sign Michael Brantley
  • Blue Jays Sign Kirby Yates
  • Twins To Sign J.A. Happ
  • Jays Refute Report Of Deal With Brantley
  • Blue Jays To Sign George Springer
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Indians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • Last 100 Comments
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

MLBTR Poll: Superstars For Sale?

By Connor Byrne | August 29, 2019 at 6:58pm CDT

ESPN scribe Jeff Passan floated a very interesting tidbit in his latest column Wednesday: There’s a belief among rival executives that the Red Sox, Indians and Cubs will at least be willing to listen to trade offers for their franchise players during the upcoming winter. That means any of Boston’s Mookie Betts, Cleveland’s Francisco Lindor or Chicago’s Kris Bryant could change hands once the offseason rolls around. It’s far from a guarantee anyone from the group will wind up on the move, but the idea that they might should make hot stove season all the more interesting.

The only member of the trio with fewer than two years of team control remaining is Betts, who will enter his final season of arbitration eligibility over the winter. The 26-year-old right fielder is just a season removed from earning AL MVP honors, which helped him land a historic $20MM payday to avoid arbitration last winter. The 2019 version of Betts hasn’t been as stellar as the MVP-winning player, but that’s not a knock on his performance this season so much as a compliment to what he did a year ago, when he amassed an eyebrow-raising 10.4 fWAR. Betts is up to 4.8 in that category this year, having slashed a strong .282/.384/.494 with 21 home runs and 13 stolen bases across 622 plate appearances.

Just a year from winning their latest World Series title, why would the Red Sox possibly move Betts? They’re unlikely to make the playoffs this year, though a trip back to the postseason in 2020 hardly looks out of the question. However, Betts has indicated on multiple occasions that he’d like to test free agency after next season, when he could reel in one of the all-time richest contracts in the sport. For the Red Sox, trading Betts a year before a potential journey to the open market would help the club replenish its farm system to some degree. The Red Sox only came in 22nd place in Baseball America’s most recent talent rankings.

The Indians, on the other hand, boast the game’s 10th-best system, though they’re incapable of spending to the extent the Red Sox can. That means Lindor is quite likely to end up elsewhere in the coming years. Mr. Smile will be a free agent after 2021, but it would behoove the Indians to get something for him prior to then. In the meantime, the 25-year-old Lindor is sure to collect a notable raise over his current $10.55MM salary when he reaches arbitration for the penultimate time during the offseason. Lindor perhaps hasn’t been quite as great as he was in 2018, a career-high 7.6-fWAR campaign, but his 4.3 mark and .300/.353/.532 line with 24 homers and 19 steals through 522 PA are mighty impressive nonetheless. Needless to say, teams will line up for the elite shortstop if small-market Cleveland goes with the agonizing decision to make him available in the coming months.

And then there’s Bryant, yet another former MVP. The Boras client joins Lindor as another all-world performer who’s slated for his second-last trip through arbitration in a few months. Bryant, 27, is well on his way to another raise (he’s currently on a $12.9MM salary), having batted .282/.379/.521 and smashed 29 dingers over 552 trips to the plate. Whether the Cubs would truly consider parting with Bryant is up in the air, but they are amid their second somewhat disappointing season (albeit one that looks as if it will culminate in yet another playoff berth), and waving goodbye to the third baseman/outfielder would go a long way toward aiding them in bolstering their system. It’s definitely a below-average group, according to BA, which places it 29th in baseball.

We’re still a couple months from the offseason rearing its head, but if anyone from this trio hits the block, it should make for an incredibly interesting winter of rumors. Do you expect any of them to actually change teams after the season?

(Poll link for app users)

Share 0 Retweet 10 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox Chicago Cubs Cleveland Indians Francisco Lindor Kris Bryant MLBTR Originals MLBTR Polls Mookie Betts

AL East Notes: Kiermaier, Holt, Pearson
Main
Kyle Seager’s Rebound Season
107 comments
newest oldest

Comments

  1. Cubbie75

    1 year ago

    the poll does not include “none of the above,” which is my answer.

    2 Like
    Reply
    • sherlock_

      1 year ago

      The “none of the above” is not answering the poll.

      Like
      Reply
      • DarkSide830

        1 year ago

        that’s not a very good sample then. you cant properly see how many people believe such.

        1 Like
        Reply
        • srechter

          1 year ago

          Lol, exactly. That’s like saying “choose red or blue” and only putting one option on the poll. Sherlock’s in need of Watson on that opinion.

          4 Like
          Reply
      • ffrhb14Sox

        1 year ago

        Poll is “will any of these three be traded?” A very logical answer is no which isnt included, terrible poll.

        Like
        Reply
      • dixoncayne

        1 year ago

        There should be an option of “No”

        Like
        Reply
    • todd76

      1 year ago

      Indians seem content letting good players go. Recently examples Brantley/Bauer. They might as well just do a fire sale and start over. I’d be disappointed as a Cleveland fan.

      2 Like
      Reply
      • sufferfortribe

        1 year ago

        Fire sale? Start over? They have enough talent that only a little re-tooling would be necessary. Heck, look what they’ve done this year even after all the major injuries. They currently qualify for the post season. You act like they suck or something.

        Like
        Reply
        • ForestCobraAL

          1 year ago

          “Indians seem content letting good players go”

          1 Like
          Reply
        • sufferfortribe

          1 year ago

          And?

          Like
          Reply
        • Polish Hammer

          1 year ago

          Don’t mind the trolls…

          Like
          Reply
      • dixoncayne

        1 year ago

        They didn’t let Bauer go. They got talent and prospects for him

        1 Like
        Reply
  2. Metman34

    1 year ago

    Betts to the Cards!!!!!!!
    Plus – Scherzer to the As!!
    Imagine
    Scherzer
    Fiers
    Luzardo
    Puk
    Montas
    (As 2019 World Series)

    Like
    Reply
    • athleticsnchill

      1 year ago

      I don’t imagine the A’s would be able to get that done without having to give up 2 or 3 of their top 10 prospects. It’d be very weird sending Luzardo and Neuse BACK to Washington for Scherzer.

      Like
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        1 year ago

        How does a team like the A’s pay for Max? Baseball needs to fix the system so reams can sign their own (Lindor with Cleveland) or make decisions on an equal playing field. Fans deserve it. Answer has always been a cap with both a floor and a ceiling but the MLBPA thinks of their superstars first believing those salaries bring up the rest, The last few years has shown change can occur and more is needed. I still believe in addition to the above, allow free agency earlier but reward teams with an exemption of the ceiling cap when they re-sign their own free agent for contracts of five or more years. At year five, only 50% counts against the otherwise hard ceiling. Other 50% comes from the pool small revenue clubs currently get and forces them to spend that money on payroll. Imagine what Lindor would get from Cleveland in such a situation. Win for the player, the team and their fans. Cleveland would be able to compete with the big market clubs, etc. May need some tweaking but the foundation is there.

        2 Like
        Reply
        • snotrocket

          1 year ago

          So, similar to the NBA…

          Like
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          1 year ago

          Perhaps but the NBA to my knowledge sets the limit on max contracts in years and dollars. My rough draft of a suggestion would not. Only the percentage is set for the existing team rule, Likely needs improving as I haven’t fully thought it out. Do you allow mid season acquisitions count? Imagine the biffing for Betts this July if the team that gets him would gain that benefit. While it would allow Boston to keep him, it also could greatly increase the return on a trade if for example he decided on where he wanted to be traded.

          Like
          Reply
        • 1drefordays6

          1 year ago

          I don’t understand these kind of statements. It’s not necessarily a money thing. The Rays have one of the lowest payrolls but beat out teams with higher payrolls. They do have a Gm that can drop the money but his team performs so there’s really no need to. So in short, baseball is a mystery on who is going to out perform who. Some players can have stellar performances when they were estimated opposite. Some players it’s the vice versa. It’s not a finance thing, it’s more chance.

          Like
          Reply
        • LordShade

          1 year ago

          If you truly believe that big market teams like the Red Sox, Yankees and Dodgers don’t hold massive advantages over a team like the A’s, you need to go back to school.

          Like
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          1 year ago

          The biggest advantage is the big market club’s ability to absorb an expensive injury or mistake. That though likely plays into their willingness to risk big money on questionable signings.

          Like
          Reply
      • kc38

        1 year ago

        He was naming that as their 5- man rotation I believe. And that is still a horrible rotation when Fiers is your number 2

        1 Like
        Reply
        • athleticsnchill

          1 year ago

          Mike Fiers has pitched like a #1 or #2 for most of the season, have you even been paying attention? 2.47 ERA in his last 127 innings.

          2 Like
          Reply
      • DarkSide830

        1 year ago

        shades of AJ Cole

        Like
        Reply
    • ffrhb14Sox

      1 year ago

      If they win the WS this year, why trade for Max?

      Like
      Reply
    • dmarcus15

      1 year ago

      Who would the Cards have to get that deal done?

      Like
      Reply
      • turkmurpson

        1 year ago

        I was wondering the same thing.

        Like
        Reply
    • zuma

      1 year ago

      You’re forgetting Manaea in that rotation.

      Like
      Reply
  3. JayRyder

    1 year ago

    Lindor GIANTS

    Like
    Reply
    • athleticsnchill

      1 year ago

      Giants absolutely don’t have what it takes to get that done. lol

      1 Like
      Reply
      • JayRyder

        1 year ago

        :)

        Like
        Reply
      • JDGoat

        1 year ago

        Bart and Ramos get Cleveland on the phone easily.

        1 Like
        Reply
        • athleticsnchill

          1 year ago

          If the Indians are interested in a rebuild, sure, but neither Ramos or Bart are close enough to being major league ready for the Indians to seriously consider it. With how the Indians have operated for a long time they have to be getting guys back that are within a year or two to the majors.

          Ramos hit well in Single A but hasn’t hit nearly as well in Double A to this point, and Bart has spent a lot of time on the IL this year. He’ll need a strong showing defensively at the AFL.

          Like
          Reply
        • athleticsnchill

          1 year ago

          Friendly reminder than MLB teams value prospects differently than MLB Pipeline, Baseball America, Baseball Prospectus and Fangraphs. Ramos and Bart could be top 100 prospects but if a team is looking to be competitive they’ll look for players that are closer to the show than highest ceiling available within a system, and even that will vary significantly from team to team, determined by system strength at a position.

          Don’t take MLB prospect rankings all that seriously.

          Like
          Reply
  4. burly

    1 year ago

    None of them will be traded this off-season.

    2 Like
    Reply
    • Gary

      1 year ago

      Betts is GONE.

      1 Like
      Reply
  5. gozurman1

    1 year ago

    Teams pretty much listen to every offer on every player they have. 99.9% of the time talks go nowhere. Then there is that 0.1% time….. Some team offers a deal that makes you almost fall out of your chair. Ya never know!

    2 Like
    Reply
  6. sheff86

    1 year ago

    THOR FOR KRIS

    Like
    Reply
    • downeysoft420

      1 year ago

      Lol

      Like
      Reply
  7. MJ

    1 year ago

    Betts to the Braves would be nice. But this isn’t MLB the Show so will have to settle in for another year of Ender and Nick

    Like
    Reply
    • ForestCobraAL

      1 year ago

      “But this isn’t MLB the Show ”

      When Ted Turner owned the Braves it was.

      Like
      Reply
      • johnsilver

        1 year ago

        Turner was great i always thought and did funny things. remember 1 time when bob Hoerner was sqawking about his salary and how much he wanted that Turner said to the media “he’d get that much when his cute curls straightened out”. hoerner had really curly hair back then and reminds me of how Logan Morrison was in his early marlin days.. Complaining fairly often and Turner was a guy who let his feelings known publicly.. A kind of nicer version of Charles O’Finley, only he did try always thought to put decent teams together, they just ended up awful in the end.

        Like
        Reply
      • MJ

        1 year ago

        Yep felt really good to be able to go out and grab guys like Maddux, McGriff, Galaragga, Neagle, Pendleton etc

        Now we are stuck with the Markakis’ of the world

        Like
        Reply
  8. Steven St Croix

    1 year ago

    Lindor to Houston for Correa, and Kyle Tucker

    1 Like
    Reply
    • sufferfortribe

      1 year ago

      Correa is injury prone. How about Whitley, instead?

      Like
      Reply
      • athleticsnchill

        1 year ago

        Replacing a guy that’s injury prone with a prospect that has some personality issues. Not sure ’bout that one.

        1 Like
        Reply
      • driftcat28

        1 year ago

        Whit is a wild card now. I agree it’d have to start with Correa and Tucker

        Like
        Reply
  9. DarkSide830

    1 year ago

    Betts being traded is about as likely as dying to a falling vending machine.

    1 Like
    Reply
    • Gary

      1 year ago

      You better start buying your Snickers at 7-11 then. That machine is going to fall this winter.

      1 Like
      Reply
  10. Yossi Ronnen

    1 year ago

    The most depressing part? The fact that we’re already talking about the off season…

    Like
    Reply
    • johnrealtime

      1 year ago

      It’s less about being cheap and more about having spent too much on other guys, in the Cub and Sox cases. They’re 2 of the highest payrolls as it is

      Like
      Reply
  11. coldbeer

    1 year ago

    Might as well just ask which owner is the cheapest? All 3 are cornerstone guys and should likely never be traded.

    1 Like
    Reply
    • Gary

      1 year ago

      The Red Sox Cornerstone guys play on the left side of the infield. The MVP right fielder who wants a Max salary is gone.

      1 Like
      Reply
      • ffrhb14Sox

        1 year ago

        Betts should be a cornerstone guy w Bogaerts. Devers and Benintendi. Thats an awesome homegrown 4. Betts at this point is the most accomplished of the 4.

        Like
        Reply
        • ScottCarriere

          1 year ago

          Not for the price that Betts will be asking in FA. I just don’t think $300+ mill is good for any team. Nor has Betts shown the consistency to command that kind of money. And Bogaerts is arguably as, or more accomplished than Betts, he has two rings.

          1 Like
          Reply
        • ffrhb14Sox

          1 year ago

          I love Bogey and he was a big part of both rings but cmon. Betts has an MVP, batting title, GGs, more all star appearances, etc. He is clearly more accomplished. While Betts did have a down 2017, he had monster years in 2016 & 2018 and while this year feels down from last year it is still high level. I can agree that the contracts are too much and too long but I think we have a better chance of him contributing through more of the contract than Sale or Price or a lot of other guys.

          Like
          Reply
  12. JDGoat

    1 year ago

    I could realistically see bot Betts and Lindor on the move. Betts because after this disaster of a season they have a perfect opportunity to retool and rebuild the farm without too many losing seasons. Dolan put the Lindor writing on the wall this past offseason.

    Like
    Reply
    • JDGoat

      1 year ago

      With the right counter moves they could still theoretically compete even without Betts as long as Sale bounces back and Bogaerts doesn’t Regress too much.

      1 Like
      Reply
      • Ejemp2006

        1 year ago

        Sale is done. As is Price.

        Like
        Reply
      • DarkSide830

        1 year ago

        Betts for MLB-ready talent looks good on paper, but that package would have to be so great it would be laughable how much talent is moving.

        Like
        Reply
  13. pasha2k

    1 year ago

    I hope they trade Mookie. I am sick to death of him talking about FA any chance he has. At least the Redsox developed great position players(X man, Raffy), n if they do it well they could bring some pitching bk for Mookie. I hate to see him leave Boston, but that’s what’s gonna happen.

    2 Like
    Reply
    • ray win

      1 year ago

      I agree. I think part of Betts’ slow start was comparing himself to Trout, and dreaming about the money he would make in free agency. He is no Trout and never will be.

      4 Like
      Reply
  14. christianivan3

    1 year ago

    Lindor Yanks

    Like
    Reply
    • RoyalsFanAmongWolves

      1 year ago

      does lindor have a BEARD or facial hair?

      Like
      Reply
      • Ctrl alt dlt

        1 year ago

        he has the kind of beard to where no one notices it until they go to the Yankees and then their face just looks wrong

        1 Like
        Reply
        • Gary

          1 year ago

          Jason Giambi LOL

          Like
          Reply
  15. RoyalsFanAmongWolves

    1 year ago

    all three play for big market teams (boston & chicago) or medium size market (cleveland).

    the only way chicago trades bryant is if they decide to refill their farm that has tumbleweeds
    because it WILL need refilled very soon, plus most of their rotation is over 30 years old, too.

    i will FOFLOL if cardinals win the NL central, though i’d personally prefer brewers winning it,

    1 Like
    Reply
  16. cgallant

    1 year ago

    If I’m Dave Dombrowski I’m offering Betts 8/250mi with 2 vesting options that could bring it up to 10/300mil.(Manny Machado’s money) If he turns it down I’m trading him for 3 solid prospects and a shut down reliever.

    3 Like
    Reply
    • Yankeedynasty

      1 year ago

      Betts is way better then Machado

      2 Like
      Reply
      • cgallant

        1 year ago

        Do you have a better comparable for a Betts contract?

        Like
        Reply
  17. jb19

    1 year ago

    I can see Betts being traded for three top 100 prospects, plus two other players. Would imagine 4 of the five players solid pitchers. Sox aren’t too far away from competing at a high level in the postseason imo. They need pitching and more pitching… not sure what contender is capable of making that trade, but Betts in Boston for another year seems like a waste.

    Like
    Reply
    • ffrhb14Sox

      1 year ago

      Sox have traded prospects and spent big dollars on pitching already. Either they are good and you bounce back next year or you dont. Trading Betts is throwing in another year when you could easily bcompetbe elite if Sale, Price, Eovaldi show up.

      Like
      Reply
      • jb19

        1 year ago

        I don’t have faith that those three guys can have a complete, healthy season. You shouldn’t have any reasonable expectation that they can either. Bullpen is a dumpster fire and Betts will test free agency, may as well trade him.

        2 Like
        Reply
        • ffrhb14Sox

          1 year ago

          So you are saying we have to give up bc our commits to the SPs has screwed us. Like I said, that is the only thing trading Mookie can mean, other than that, dumb move.

          Like
          Reply
        • ScottCarriere

          1 year ago

          Bullpen has been a shiny dumpster for about a month.

          Like
          Reply
        • ffrhb14Sox

          1 year ago

          Bullpen has been asked to cover for the rotation all year and they arent built for that. Even the Yanks bullpen would wear down behind the effort of this rotation.

          Like
          Reply
        • Michael Birks

          1 year ago

          Yeah, I was going to say the problem isn’t the bullpen, it’s the person utilizing the bullpen, Cora just doesn’t seem to do a good job of managing it in my opinion of course

          Like
          Reply
    • Bocephus

      1 year ago

      Dude wtf? The Red Sox ain’t the Angels. People get a grip!

      Like
      Reply
      • jb19

        1 year ago

        No they “ain’t”, very astute observation.

        Like
        Reply
        • Bocephus

          1 year ago

          Trout-being wasted on the Angels. Betts is far from being wasted on the Red Sox.

          3 Like
          Reply
        • jb19

          1 year ago

          My original comment was specifically for the 2020 season… my original suggestion was to improve the Sox arms with upper tier pitching that they don’t have in the minors. Trading Betts is a good way to accomplish that. I completely missed the insinuation that you were comparing Trout to Betts. I think Betts is great, but he’s no Trout. You shouldn’t make that comparison again and Trout is being wasted in LA.

          Like
          Reply
    • DarkSide830

      1 year ago

      a waste? how is that? that is mich better said about JBJ.

      Like
      Reply
      • ffrhb14Sox

        1 year ago

        Im good w JBJ at the right price. You now know you get a gold glove and a hitter that has flashes but cant be consistent. Not everyone has to be a superstar, just be what you are paid to be.

        Like
        Reply
    • Pork Chop Pough

      1 year ago

      No one is going to trade half that for the right to pay Betts ~$25M next year and then watch him enter free agency. He won’t be traded because his short term contract/team rights will make it nearly impossible for the Red Sox and any team to agree on his actual value. The Red Sox are also one of only a handful of teams that can let a guy enter free agency without it really hurting their chances of resigning him.

      Like
      Reply
  18. Frank Friedlander

    1 year ago

    Other: Christian Yelich. The Brewers have no farm system, and questionable big league talent beyond Yelich and Hader.

    Like
    Reply
  19. steviep

    1 year ago

    it’s not dombrowski’s MO to do something for the farm system. i don’t see mookie moving.

    Like
    Reply
    • ScottCarriere

      1 year ago

      Probably the best argument I’ve heard against it.

      Like
      Reply
  20. Jeff Zanghi

    1 year ago

    I’m a Red Sox fan and I think the Sox should trade Betts this off-season. He’s a terrific player but he isn’t on the level of say Mike Trout (despite having a season – last year – that garnered him MVP rights over Trout) but he is going to get paid like Trout and I don’t think the Sox are going to be the ones to pay him — nor do I really want them to if he’s going to want 10 years an $300+M. I just don’t think he’s going to be a good investment for that long and that much — which leads me to the conclusion that they should deal him now (this off-season) while they still can, and get a solid haul in return. If he were like Bogaerts or something and changed his mind and wanted to stick around at a decent rate — I’d love for them to sign him long term for 5-7 years and $25-$30m/season but I don’t think that’ll get it done – and I think no matter what they offer he’ll test FA and probably get a megadeal elsewhere. So yeah, I’m fine with them trading him now and getting something good in return.

    2 Like
    Reply
  21. Stanley

    1 year ago

    Trade Betts honestly is the best idea rebuild the farm

    2 Like
    Reply
  22. miltpappas

    1 year ago

    I can honestly see the Red Sox being pig-headed enough to hold onto Betts believing he will re-sign with them which would be a terrible idea. Trade him this winter and get a great package in return or at least next summer as a rental and get a couple of prospedts.

    1 Like
    Reply
  23. Lou Orlando

    1 year ago

    I could see Bryant being traded for young pitching. Cubs rotation is getting a tad long in the tooth.

    Betts or Lindor? Doubt either gets moved. And if one does get moved, that Allied Van Lines truck better be packed to its roof with top level prospects. There’s more at play here than just the numbers when it comes to these two. Both are big time fan favorites, and everyone knows you don’t p*ss off your customers.

    Looking for a big name who might get traded? How about Corey Seager (LA)? Readily replaceable with Gavin Lux. Also, time for the Reds to move on from Joey Votto. He could still have some value to a contender despite 2019 being a down year for him.

    1 Like
    Reply
  24. driftcat28

    1 year ago

    I would trade a lot of players to see Bryant on the Yanks

    1 Like
    Reply
    • Robertn623

      1 year ago

      As long as one of those players is gleybar torress

      Like
      Reply
  25. Michael Birks

    1 year ago

    As a Sox fan, I said give him a key every opportunity to sign a humongous deal, if he balks at the offer (8 years 220 million or so) trade him in the offseason…surely he is worth quite a bit trade wise, even for only a year

    1 Like
    Reply
  26. FattKemp

    1 year ago

    If the Sox dump JBJ like I first demanded that they do 5 years ago and make Mookie a CF, then I’d allow them to throw a dump truck of money at him.

    Barring that, I too am listening to trade offers.

    Like
    Reply
  27. Bruin1012

    1 year ago

    The Red Sox are over the lux tax line again this year and it looks like next year is the time to reset the lux tax. If JDM opts out then there is less of a chance of Betts being traded but if JDM doesn’t opt out there is almost no way they can go under the Lux Tax next year without trading Betts. The Red Sox are going to have a formidable offense even without Betts and there 2020 fortunes are going to ride on the pitching staff. If the pitching bounces back strong then the Sox will compete whether or not they have Betts. I think Boston should trade Betts I’m skeptical how he is going to age.

    1 Like
    Reply
    • ffrhb14Sox

      1 year ago

      I may be off but I think they can be fine. Money coming off according to Sporttrac, Porcello $20.6M, Moreland $6.5M, Pearce $6.25M, Sandoval $18.4M, Nunez $5M, Thornburg $1.75M. That alone is upper $50M without JD opting out. Sale’s figure goes up about $10M. Can you really see any reason anyone gets a huge arbitration bump after 2019 performances? Lets say it is $20M. That is approaching $30M less which puts them under or around the lowest level of lux tax I brlieve. The only holes they have can be filled at 1B by Chavis-Travis-Dalbec, 2B Chavis-Holt-Hernandez, 5th starter Wright-Johnson-Houck-Hernandez-? (cant be worse than what we saw this year). I’d totally be fine w that for next year. If Sale, Price, Eovaldi are back they are a playoff team at least. If those 3 aren’t then it’ll be 2019 over again. No reason to trade Mookie and give up the chance that the rotation will bounce back in 2020.

      Like
      Reply
      • Bruin1012

        1 year ago

        Sale and Xander are going to eat up 23 million of the 50 million coming off the books plus increases in arbitration I believe either JDM needs to opt out or they trade Mookie to reset the tax.

        Like
        Reply
        • ffrhb14Sox

          1 year ago

          On Sporttrac Xanders figure went up this year, thats why I didnt include him. Maybe they are wrong. I hope JD does opt out, that in my mind was ideal scenario the day he signed it w those opt outs. Got 2 great seasons from him at a pretty fair price, let someone else add money and years from here forward.

          Like
          Reply
        • Bruin1012

          1 year ago

          Xander was 12 this year 20 next year and Sale was 15 this year and 30 next year.

          Like
          Reply
  28. AJOConnor8

    1 year ago

    Betts will show his cards and sign an extension. However, I am a bit concerned that he doesn’t care enough about winning to actually do that. So I have no idea. ‍♂️

    Like
    Reply
  29. jmocubsfan8

    1 year ago

    Lindor and Hand to the Cubs for Caratini, Russell, Schwarber, and whatever to balance.

    Like
    Reply
    • hockeyjohn

      1 year ago

      Why would the Indians want the Cubs’ backups? This proposal is one of the worst that I have seen on here.

      Like
      Reply
      • jmocubsfan8

        1 year ago

        maybe you should stick to hockey then. Caratini is a blocked starting catcher, Schwarber is a 40hr DH, and Russell is every bit the defender at short that Lindor is.

        Add to that, Cleveland is cheap, and this move without anything added gives them more team control for less money spent while still Fielding productive players with upside.

        This is why I added the “whatever to balance” portion. To me, that represents Aramis Ademan and a B+ pitching prospect or two.

        Like
        Reply
        • hockeyjohn

          1 year ago

          Cleveland has a starting catcher that they are happy with. They already have a 40 hr DH in Franmil Reyes and Russell is not the type of player that the Cleveland organization would employ. So your main pieces of your offer are a catcher and a DH that the Indians do not need and a domestic violence violator. Yea, I am impressed with that offer. Even a hockey fan would see that your offering your spare pieces for a superstar and a closer. Also this offer does not help team control as Russell and Schwarber, like Lindor and Hand, only have two years of control beyond this season.

          Your offer may make sense for the Cubs, But it does not make any sense for the Indians. Cleveland may be cheap, as you put it, but they are not stupid. They are a well operated small market team that would quickly hang up on this offer.

          Really, look in the mirror, jmocubfan8, and tell me that the Indians could not get a better offer IF they made Lindor available. They could probably get 28 better offers than this one.

          Also, jmo, your comment about “stick to hockey, is not very creative. I hear it every time I comment against someone’s ludicrous trade proposal.

          Like
          Reply
        • hockeyjohn

          1 year ago

          Jmocubfan8, there is a website called Baseball Trade Values that give uses various bits of information to assign a player a number value. For your trade above here are their values.

          Cubs – Caratini – 9.7, Russell 2, Schwarber 34.9, and Ademan 13.6 for a Trade Valuye of 60.2.

          Indians – Lindor 80.6 and Hand 24.4 for a total of 105. So this site also agrees with me and the others that commented that your trade is not equal in value. As a matter of fact we can add Hoerner, the Cubs top prospect (24.7) and that still would not be equal value (84.9),

          This should show you that your trade was not well thought out.

          Like
          Reply
  30. Bruin1012

    1 year ago

    Jimocubs I wanted to say more then this but if you don’t see how one sided this trade is then I can’t help you. I will give you a chance to make up for this you said and whatever else to make up for the difference what do you think that is because what you have proposed is not even close. So what else?

    1 Like
    Reply
    • ncaachampillini

      1 year ago

      That’s not a good offer. If the Cubs offered those players it would get the deal done only if those were the add ins to go along with the Cubs best minor league prospect. Hoerner or Alzolay or someone like that. Still though SS isn’t a Cubs spot of need anyway. Guess they could move Baez back to 2nd though.

      Like
      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Astros Agree To Two-Year Deal With Jason Castro

    Astros To Re-Sign Michael Brantley

    Blue Jays Sign Kirby Yates

    Twins To Sign J.A. Happ

    Jays Refute Report Of Deal With Brantley

    Blue Jays To Sign George Springer

    Angels To Sign Jose Quintana

    Don Sutton Passes Away

    White Sox Sign Liam Hendriks

    Mets Fire GM Jared Porter

    Recent

    Latest On Trevor Bauer

    George Springer Notes: Astros, Mets, Braves

    Rays Sign Yacksel Rios To Minor League Deal

    Mariners Notes: Payroll, Flexen, Bullpen, Haniger

    Blue Jays Designate Anthony Castro

    Yankees, Asher Wojciechowski Agree To Minor League Deal

    MLBTR Chat Transcript

    Talking Collective Bargaining With Labor Lawyer Eugene Freedman

    Nationals, Hernan Perez Agree To Minor League Deal

    Reds Among Teams Interested In Andrelton Simmons

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Trevor Bauer Rumors
    • Kris Bryant Rumors
    • J.T. Realmuto Rumors
    • Marcell Ozuna Rumors
    • Masahiro Tanaka Rumors
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Indians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version