Headlines

  • Orioles Fire Manager Brandon Hyde
  • Ben Joyce Undergoes Season-Ending Shoulder Surgery
  • Dodgers Promote Dalton Rushing, Designate Austin Barnes For Assignment
  • Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death
  • Rangers Place Corey Seager On Injured List
  • Cubs Promote Moises Ballesteros
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

MLBTR Poll: Kevin Gausman’s Qualifying Offer Decision

By Anthony Franco | November 8, 2020 at 11:47am CDT

Kevin Gausman has until November 11 to decide whether to accept the qualifying offer he was issued by the Giants. Should he accept, he’ll return to San Francisco on a one-year, $18.9MM deal. That wouldn’t foreclose the possibility of a multi-year extension with San Francisco, just as José Abreu and the White Sox brokered a three-year contract after Abreu accepted Chicago’s QO last winter. Rejecting the qualifying offer might pave the way for multi-year offers from other clubs, though. Gausman and his representatives have surely been gauging the market the past few days to shape their decision.

There’s a case to be made for Gausman as the second-best starter on the open market. The right-hander pitched to a 3.62 ERA/3.09 FIP across 59.2 innings this past season. His 32.2% strikeout rate ranked eleventh in baseball (minimum 50 innings pitched), topped only by Trevor Bauer’s 36% among free agents. Gausman finished tenth overall in strikeout minus walk rate and seventh in swinging strike rate. On a per-pitch basis, only Jacob deGrom, Lucas Giolito, Kenta Maeda, Shane Bieber, Luis Castillo and Gerrit Cole generated more whiffs. Gausman truly was among the game’s elite at fooling opposing hitters.

Moreover, he’s also one of the harder-throwing starting pitchers available. Gausman averaged north of 95 MPH on his heater last season, per Brooks Baseball. He got elite results on both the fastball and his signature splitter. Gausman didn’t find a breaking ball he was comfortable using frequently, a problem that has hampered him throughout his career. That didn’t seem to matter, though, as he was highly effective regardless.

Of course, teams aren’t solely factoring in a player’s performance in his platform year. That’s all the more true in a significantly shortened season. Gausman’s only a season removed from posting a 5.72 ERA over 102.1 innings, contributing to the Reds’ decision to non-tender him last winter rather than pay him approximately $10.6MM to return in 2020. Some of the underlying metrics at the time hinted at a potential rebound but it was nevertheless a surprise to see him perform at such a high level this past season. Gausman’s less consistent track record could lead to some trepidation on teams’ parts, particularly since signing him would cost them draft compensation at the very least.

It’s also worth considering whether next winter’s market would present a more favorable environment. Teams aren’t expected to spend aggressively this winter in the wake of massive revenue losses. Next offseason might still have COVID-19 effects, and there’ll be anticipated labor uncertainty with the scheduled expiration of the collective bargaining agreement in December 2021 (although it’s possible MLB and the MLBPA broker a short-term CBA extension in the wake of the pandemic).

Gausman would be one year older next offseason obviously, but he’ll only turn 30 in January 2021. He’d still be young enough to secure a lofty multi-year deal if he accepts the qualifying offer, then backs up 2020 with another strong season. The CBA prohibits players from being offered multiple qualifying offers in their careers, so Gausman will never have to wrestle with this decision again, no matter what he decides in the coming days.

In our top 50 free agents list, the MLBTR staff predicted Gausman would indeed accept the qualifying offer. We’ll turn things over to the readership with a pair of questions: should Gausman take the qualifying offer, and will he do so?

(poll links for app users)

 

 

Share 0 Retweet 5 Send via email0

MLBTR Originals MLBTR Polls San Francisco Giants Kevin Gausman

Red Sox, Jackie Bradley Jr. Have Been In Contact
Main
Quick Hits: Lindor, White Sox, Universal DH
View Comments (56)
Post a Comment

56 Comments

  1. braves2

    5 years ago

    gausman is gau-bage. no one is going to pay him that much in FA unless he pitches well this year, and even then a lot rides on the covid. I’d almost say he’d be stupid not to take it even if he pitched better than he did based on circumstances

    Reply
    • Clampdown

      5 years ago

      Why is Gausman holding out for something like a 4 for 36 outside of the realm of possibility?

      Reply
      • Draven_X_23

        5 years ago

        Because he would be getting $19 mil for 1 year. So he would have to ask if he could do better than 3 years $17 mil after next season without a QO attached to it.. Lets look back and see he made over $9 mil coming off a mid 5 ERA season.

        1
        Reply
  2. sandman12

    5 years ago

    Big mistake by SF – foolish decision

    1
    Reply
    • jdgoat

      5 years ago

      They got a guy who pitched well for them on a one year deal. I’m sure they’re not expecting to make a push for the top at this point in the retooling so there’s really no risk that this impacts them if it blows up. Worst case, they spent 19 million on a one year contract that is gone before they are competing for the playoffs. Best case, he builds off of last season and they have a good trade chip or extension candidate. There’s not really such thing as a bad one year contract for a team in the Giants position.

      6
      Reply
      • scottn59c

        5 years ago

        Exactly. The have the money, and pitching is a need. Besides, I’m confident they’ll re-work the QO into a 2-3 year deal.

        1
        Reply
        • ABStract

          5 years ago

          Im also amazed anyone has a problem with this…makes too much sense

          3
          Reply
        • SFGiants4ever

          5 years ago

          ABStract, the people that have a problem either are not baseball wise enough to get it, or they’re just (and I hate to sound juvenile using this word) haters.
          There is no way the Giants could have gone without offering him the QO.
          It has been said already, but if he does well they can keep him if they’re doing well, or trade him if the team isn’t competing. If he regresses to the previous numbers they only have him for one season. If they sign him to a multi year deal, it won’t be at 18 mil a year, my guess closer to 14 a season so even if at worse he is a #4 it won’t be a huge overpay for them.

          Reply
      • claude raymond

        5 years ago

        Hey goat, “one year contract that is gone before they are competing for the playoffs”? Your words. Please explain. Did you mean ‘competing for a title’?

        They competed for the playoffs this year. Elminated final weekend. So, again, do you want to explain for us!

        Reply
    • Buzz Saw

      5 years ago

      Did you read the entire article?

      Reply
  3. oldmansteve

    5 years ago

    If this was a normal offseason I would expect Gausman to decline the QO, but considering no team was willing to claim Brad hand on a 10mil AAV contract, there is no way Gausman gets anything close to 18mil in free agency. Honestly surprised the Giants offered it to him considering how cheap the market will be.

    2
    Reply
    • oldoak33

      5 years ago

      He might not get 18 AAV on a multi year, but he was offered 1/18 guaranteed. Clearly the valuation on him is much higher than Brad Hand, so Brad Hand isn’t a comp. He’s just an example of one reliever not being picked up at 10MM for one year.

      Gausman won’t get 3/54, but certainly he can gross more than 18MM.

      1
      Reply
    • drasco036

      5 years ago

      There has to be more to the Brad Hand situation than just his salary.

      People are talking about the financial situation of baseball but the Jays took a flyer on Robbie Ray at 8 million on a one year deal. The Giants extended a QO to Gausman. Granted, both cases they have been starting pitchers but Hand has been one of the best closers in the league for a couple years now and 10 million for a top tier closer is a bargain.

      Reply
  4. nats3256

    5 years ago

    19 million is good money to prove yourself on. take it.

    3
    Reply
  5. CONservative governMENt

    5 years ago

    If Gausman declines to QO then he is a crazy person.

    Especially because it would keep him in the perfect home park for good numbers next year.

    Reply
    • ABStract

      5 years ago

      So right!
      I’m surprised SF doesn’t have more pitchers trying to restart their careers there

      Reply
  6. Oddvark

    5 years ago

    There are so many teams in need of starting pitching that I think there will be a decent market for the top few starters in FA. And Gausman may be coming off a career year, so I don’t think it would be a bad idea for him to try to capitalize on that and lock in something like 3/37 or 4/45, which I think could be available. Obviously far less AAV, but more long-term security in case of injury or performance drop-off.

    Maybe he accepts the QO and tries to negotiate those kind of terms with SF, as the article suggested. But if SF doesn’t give him indications that it is interested in an extension, testing the FA market wouldn’t be a terrible idea IMHO..

    1
    Reply
    • Mr. E Team

      5 years ago

      This is on point. I would presume Gausman’s agent is trying to gauge the market. If there isn’t interest in a multi-year deal, then accepting the QO is an easy decision.

      Reply
      • baseballpun

        5 years ago

        His agent = Kevin’s Gauge-man.

        Reply
    • Ducky Buckin Fent

      5 years ago

      D’accord, @oddvark.

      This is a great off-season for teams to build bullpens or plug multiple holes in the lineup.
      The starting pitcher market is not close in the sheer depth or quality of options.

      What did Sonny Gray get from Cincinnati? 3 for 30, I think? I can see him getting a comparable deal even in this environment.

      If I were he, I’d decline it. Or…so I’d like to think. 😉

      Man. I’d love to be a fly on the wall and hear what these agents are recommending to their clients.

      1
      Reply
  7. julyn82001

    5 years ago

    19 million for six month – possibly – of just baseball work? Only in America. I would take it.

    1
    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      5 years ago

      how much are Ronaldo and Messi making

      3
      Reply
      • mlb1225

        5 years ago

        Ronaldo made $37 million USD (31 million euros) in 2019. Messi made $34.2 million (26 million pounds).

        1
        Reply
      • A'sfaninLondonUK

        5 years ago

        @ dark side – I see your point but they’re not usually in the same conversation as Kevin Gausman…

        Reply
        • ChangedName

          5 years ago

          Haha, only on MLBTradeRumors can the European soccer equivalent of Kevin Gausman be Ronaldo and Messi, LOL!

          Reply
    • swinging wood

      5 years ago

      When you are one of the best 780 in the world in a field that has high demand and pays accordingly, you could make as much. Are you? Then that’s why you don’t.

      4
      Reply
    • oldmansteve

      5 years ago

      I don’t know what’s dumber: thinking big sports contracts only exist in America or thinking that Baseball players only work for 6 months a year.

      3
      Reply
      • ABStract

        5 years ago

        A little harsh, but I can’t disagree with your point

        Reply
  8. Murphy NFLD

    5 years ago

    I think he turns it down and gets something like 38-42 over 3 yrs

    1
    Reply
    • Draven_X_23

      5 years ago

      Why? Its $19 million for 1 year. Why would he take $17-20 million total for 2 more years

      Reply
      • smuzqwpdmx

        5 years ago

        Because he’s an erratic pitcher who has about a 50% chance of killing his value with a bad season in 2021. But I don’t think he’ll see any such $40M contract offers…. that’s quite a bet to place on 60 good innings for a guy who was terrible the previous year.

        Reply
      • SFGiants4ever

        5 years ago

        Because that is a guaranteed contract for three years, if he regresses in 21 he won’t see an offer near that. And he isn’t going to get a 3 year offer at 18 mil/per.

        Reply
  9. rememberthecoop

    5 years ago

    Many think it’s a no- brainer for him to accept. And I get it, that’s a nice chunk of change. However,
    given his past performance, maybe he should decline and look for a 3-year deal coming off the kind of platform season he is unlikely to repeat. Look, the pandemic ain’t going nowhere, and there portends to be a labor stoppage after this season, so there is no guarantee that the market will be more favorable for him next year.

    2
    Reply
  10. LLGiants64

    5 years ago

    The comment re: lack of a breaking ball: Not many pitchers can live on a fastball only menu going into their mid-30’s, so a multi year contract would worry me. If he accepts, he could be trade bait late in the season if the Giants (and they won’t be) are not in the hunt in mid July.

    Good move by the Giants, for one year only.

    Reply
    • dpsmith22

      5 years ago

      oddly enough the lack of a breaking ball has been there since the O’s drafted him. He obviously can throw it consistently or he would be a top tier starter imo.

      Reply
  11. Mrtwotone

    5 years ago

    He better take it that’s an insane AAV

    1
    Reply
  12. Brac2brac

    5 years ago

    Take the money and negotiate a 4 /$48MM deal or 4/$45MM deal with a big signing bonus to mitigate risk of another covid shortened season. $12Mm bonus, $6MM, $9MM,$9MM,$9MM,

    Reply
    • SFGiants402

      5 years ago

      I can’t imagine the Giants wanting to work out an extension with Gausman. They likely want him on another 1-year deal so the commitment isn’t long-term.

      Gausman will get more money than 18.9M if he turns down the QO. He’ll probably get something along the lines of 3/45 from someone. The question is: where does he want to play?

      If he wants to play in San Francisco next year, which he has indicated he would like to, then I think it behooves him to take the QO.

      Reply
      • worthington

        5 years ago

        You are wrong Giants are working on a multi year deal. They rate Gausman after Bauer.

        Reply
  13. LordD99

    5 years ago

    Well, 59 innings does not undo his career inconsistency issues. He’s had hot streaks prior within a regular season. Just so happens he had one in an abbreviated season, which can create the impression he’s turned the corner. Teams will be hesitant to believe in that. So Kevin, as I’m sure you’re reading, and will no doubt make your decision based on my advice, I’d recommend going for the most money. I know, brilliant!

    1) Accept the $18.9M and go celebrate. Then go out and repeat your 2020 season over a 162-game schedule. Then you’ll have banked nearly $19M and have huge, huuuge offers awaiting, as a soon-to-be former president is fond of saying. No politics here. He does like to say huuuge.

    2) Have your agent be dialing up every team before your decision to gauge your market. If you get an indication there’s like a 4/60 deal waiting, we’ll, ummm, some quick math here, uhhh, carry the one…yup, it looks like that would be something like $40M more than $19M, so yeah go for that. General financial advice, if you’ve been an inconsistent starter who would normally go begging for a job, thank your lucky COVID stars and take the extra $40M. Taking an extra $40M is always good. Gives you a nice warm feeling knowing your kids and eventual grandkids are all taken care of.

    3) Now it gets a little trickier in between. If you’re thinking you’ll only get a 3/30, that is $11M more than $19M, but you can ignore my initial advice at this level. Take the QO. Yes, you are leaving $11M behind, but you’re banking $18.9M, and even if you regress, you’ll still easily find $11M over the following two seasons. No loss. Just don’t injure your arm. Regression, recoverable. Injury, bad.

    So there’s my framework. No need to thank me. Won’t even ask for a percentage. Good luck. Just make sure your agent is on the phone these next few days.

    2
    Reply
  14. DodgerOK

    5 years ago

    Take it! This is your ‘set for life’ contract. Put it in the bank.

    1
    Reply
    • ABStract

      5 years ago

      Yes!

      Reply
  15. SFGiants402

    5 years ago

    I don’t see how anyone could think this is a bad deal for the Giants. Gausman played well enough to earn himself a multi-year contract this winter. He’ll command a minimum of 12-14M per year on a multi-year contract, so you’re talking at least 24M for two years.

    2/24 is worse than 1/18.9, because it’s more money overall and a longer commitment. If Gausman doesn’t repeat his 2020 success, you can move on a lot sooner.

    The Giants are an estimated 88M under the luxury tax threshold for 2021, and the Giants will target starting pitching, so it’s not as if Gausman is taking up money that needs to go somewhere else.

    I’d guess Gausman accepts the offer.

    Reply
    • Old User Name

      5 years ago

      As the saying goes “There are no bad one year deals.”

      2
      Reply
  16. mt in baltimore

    5 years ago

    If this chump is the 2nd best SP in this year’s FA Market, it is a very weak market.

    This guy is not a winner, not a leader, and not a very good pitcher..

    1
    Reply
    • swinging wood

      5 years ago

      I take it that he also kicked your dog.

      4
      Reply
      • ABStract

        5 years ago

        @antone, laughed out loud at that one

        Reply
    • dpsmith22

      5 years ago

      I would argue that the handling of Gausman, by the O’s did him no favors. He needed to develop a breaking ball And didn’t/couldn’t and they gave up on him. He has 2 plus pitches.

      1
      Reply
  17. bobtillman

    5 years ago

    He should take it, then go to church and light 1,800,000 candles.

    1
    Reply
  18. Robertowannabe

    5 years ago

    Unless I was a top tier guy, I would absolutely accept the QO this year then see if I could parlay that into a longer deal like Abreu ddi. Very few teams will,be,willing to spend big money this off season on no elite players,because of so many unknowns with COVID-19 still exist.

    Reply
  19. bravesfan

    5 years ago

    He would be 1000% stupid to not take that money

    Reply
  20. pato349

    5 years ago

    I really hope this is a shrewd move by Farhan and that he knows he won’t accept the QO. That $19 mil could be better spent somewhere else. There are 4-5 FA Starters who could be the 2021 version of what Gausman was this year and they would surely cost less.

    If Gausman does accept, he immediately becomes the Giants Ace which means we are screwed for 2021. Farhan will once again hope he starts strong and try to flip him for prospects before the deadline. The rebuild will continue with little traction since another year will have been wasted with no sure fire building blocks added. Prospects at some point have to become major leaguers and none of the Giants prospects other than Luciano look like locks.

    There are rumors that the Giants could be big spenders this offseason with around $80 mil in cap space. If they sign Gausman they are down to closer to $60 and may be less inclined to sign any other large contracts. With as many holes in the lineup, rotation, and bullpen as they have, 2021 could be a huge regress for a team claiming they want to compete for the playoffs. Hold off on buying season tickets Giants fans if you are smart.

    Reply
    • SFGiants402

      5 years ago

      “Prospects at some point have to become major leaguers and none of the Giants prospects other than Luciano look like locks.”

      If this is the case, Gausman on a one-year deal is exactly what the Giants should want: a good pitcher that’s at least half-way watchable that doesn’t require a long-term commitment and potentially block future prospects.

      For what it’s worth, the Giants don’t have a lot of young pitching that’s going to be ready to go at the start of the season. I’d imagine Zaidi will call up Corry, Hjelle and a few others throughout 2021, but they’ll need some arms, and some decent ones if they expect to not be absolutely putrid.

      They can easily get a glut of players for around 50-60M, including Gausman’s QO acceptance.

      2 relievers for 8-10M each. Top dollar = 20M.
      1 other starter at 15M = 37M (running count)
      1 left-handed bench option at 4M = 41M.

      That still gives them 10-20M to work with, and come in 20M under the luxury tax limit. None of those signings have to be long-term commitments, either, so they don’t have to block younger players.

      Reply
  21. Pete'sView

    5 years ago

    The Giants are taking a calculated risk on a pitcher worth far less than $18.9M. If they can sign him to a 3/36, okay. Anything more (no more years OR money), forgettabut it. If he walks, SF gets a draft pick.

    1
    Reply
  22. WarkMohlers

    5 years ago

    I could see a team signing Gausman a longer term contract (2-3years) if they sign another QO player prior. Assuming the price isn’t too high like (2/25 or 3/33).

    Reply
  23. toastyroasty

    5 years ago

    The pandemic IS going somewhere starting January 20 but that may mean that major league baseball is not played again in front of fans next spring. The smart money takes the qualifying offer.

    1
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Orioles Fire Manager Brandon Hyde

    Ben Joyce Undergoes Season-Ending Shoulder Surgery

    Dodgers Promote Dalton Rushing, Designate Austin Barnes For Assignment

    Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death

    Rangers Place Corey Seager On Injured List

    Cubs Promote Moises Ballesteros

    Evan Longoria To Sign One-Day Contract, Retire As Member Of Rays

    Diamondbacks To Promote Jordan Lawlar

    Rockies Fire Bud Black

    Cubs Promote Cade Horton

    Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base

    Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton

    Mariners Claim Leody Taveras

    Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach

    A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery

    Blue Jays Sign Spencer Turnbull

    Blue Jays Sign José Ureña

    Ross Stripling Retires

    Rangers Place Leody Taveras On Outright Waivers

    Triston Casas Likely To Miss Entire 2025 Season Due To Knee Surgery

    Recent

    NL East Notes: Young, Mauricio, Edwards

    MLBTR Chat Transcript

    Dodgers Notes: Kershaw, Edman, Hernandez, Ohtani

    Giants Move Jordan Hicks To Bullpen

    Dodgers Activate Clayton Kershaw

    Twins Place Byron Buxton On Concussion IL

    Jose Quintana Seeking Second Opinion On Shoulder

    Pirates Activate Spencer Horwitz

    White Sox Outright Jacob Amaya

    Yankees Notes: Canning, Cousins, Stanton

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version