Headlines

  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Max Scherzer Open To Waiving No-Trade Rights

By Steve Adams | July 27, 2021 at 3:45pm CDT

3:45pm: Scherzer would not approve a trade to the Mets, reports SNY’s Andy Martino, nor would the Nationals be open to trading Scherzer to the current NL East leaders.

8:41am: If Scherzer is to waive his no-trade clause, the right-hander “strongly prefers the West Coast,” a source tells MLB.com’s Mark Feinsand.  This would naturally favor the Giants, Padres, and Dodgers, while such AL West clubs as the Angels, Athletics, or Mariners couldn’t be ruled out.

July 27, 7:34am: The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal has some details on Scherzer’s complex contract situation, as Scherzer’s deal contains a lot of deferred money.  The roughly $11.8MM remaining of Scherzer’s $35MM salary for 2021 is entirely deferred until 2028, so a new team wouldn’t have to pay that money out for seven years.  However, Scherzer’s luxury tax number would be around the $10MM mark, which is certainly a factor for teams trying to avoid a tax payment.  Scherzer has another $7.5MM in signing bonus money due this September, but Rosenthal notes that this bonus payment “is solely the Nationals’ obligation.”

July 26: Nationals ace Max Scherzer has been one of the most intriguing trade candidates in baseball as the Nationals have slid down the standings following a scorching month of June, but a trade surrounding him is also complicated for myriad reasons. He’s being paid $35MM in 2021 and has more than $100MM in deferred money still owed to him from 2022-28. The Nationals, historically, do not operate as sellers under general manager Mike Rizzo. Scherzer has full no-trade protection as a 10-and-5 player (10 years of MLB service, the past five with the same team). Additionally, agent Scott Boras has previously suggested that Scherzer would require some type of incentive (e.g. a contract extension) in order to waive those rights.

It would seem that at least one of those major hurdles, however, is surmountable. Jesse Dougherty of the Washington Post reports (via Twitter) that Scherzer is open to being traded and would not invoke his 10-and-5 rights for the sole purpose of remaining with the Nationals. However, Scherzer could use that full no-trade protection as a way to have a say in his ultimate destination if the Nats are presented with offers from multiple clubs.

It’s not yet clear whether the Nationals are going to legitimately make Scherzer available, although a weekend sweep at the hands of a 34-64 Orioles club couldn’t have helped convince Rizzo and his staff that the Nats need to operate as a buyer. Rizzo said just under a week ago that he was approaching the deadline with a both a “buy” and “sell” mindset, remaining open to all possibilities depending on how his team played. The implication was that with a strong showing, the Nats would act as they tend to do under Rizzo: make at least incremental upgrades in an effort to push toward the postseason.

That hasn’t happened, however. The Nats are 1-4 since those comments from Rizzo, including the sweep in Baltimore, and the fact that the Nationals had to slow Stephen Strasburg’s throwing program down once again only adds another negative element to the equation. Washington now finds itself eight games below .500, seven and a half back of the division lead and 11 out in the Wild Card hunt. The generally feeble nature of the NL East and the top-heavy trio of contenders in the NL West mean that the only path for an NL East club to reach the postseason is likely via a division title. FanGraphs gives the Nats a 1.4 percent chance of making the playoffs; PECOTA is only marginally better, at an even 2.0 percent.

If the Nats do indeed make Scherzer available, he’d (obviously) be the best starting pitcher on a market that is lacking in impact arms. The three-time Cy Young winner and eight-time All-Star, who turns 37 tomorrow, has pitched to a 2.83 ERA with a brilliant 35.1 percent strikeout rate and a 6.1 percent walk rate in 105 innings this season. He’s had one astonishing meltdown that the Padres and Daniel Camarena will never forget, wherein Scherzer allowed 12 percent of the runs he’s yielded all season on one pitch to a just-called-up relief pitcher. Outside of that night, Scherzer has allowed 26 runs in 101 1/3 innings of work (2.31 ERA). He’s held opponents to two or fewer runs in 14 of his 18 starts.

It’s also worth noting that Scherzer had his Saturday start against the Orioles scratched due to discomfort in his right triceps. The injury popped up when he was taking batting practice, not pitching and Scherzer has already said publicly that he plans to make his next start. He underwent an MRI that came back clean, and (via MASNsports.com’s Mark Zuckerman), manager Dave Martinez said Scherzer’s bullpen session today went as planned. Assuming he feels fine tomorrow, he’d be in line to start Thursday’s game for the Nationals — their final game prior to Friday afternoon’s trade deadline.

Share 0 Retweet 14 Send via email0

New York Mets Newsstand Washington Nationals Max Scherzer

Twins Place Taylor Rogers On Injured List
Main
Stephen Strasburg To Undergo Thoracic Outlet Surgery
View Comments (300)
Post a Comment

300 Comments

  1. Chev Chelios

    4 years ago

    Nats gonna trade Mad Max…then resign him this offseason

    I respect this organization and their moves…very smart

    5
    Reply
    • bucsfan0004

      4 years ago

      If he gets traded to… San Diego, he’ll never leave. He’ll likely stay with any west coast team if you think about it.

      18
      Reply
      • Deleted Userrr

        4 years ago

        What makes you say that?

        Reply
        • bucsfan0004

          4 years ago

          If he gets traded it will be to a playoff contender, do you really think he’s going back to a team that’s not ready to win after spending an October in the post-season pitching games that matter?

          2
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @bucsfan0004…

          1. He will if they outbid everyone else.

          2. Who says the Nats won’t contend in 2022?

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BovineCrab

          youtube.com/watch?v=BLUkgRAy_Vo

          Reply
        • DODGER JR

          4 years ago

          San Diego can’t sign everyone my man. They are about to blow by the luxury tax plus they will get Clevenger back next year. They can’t afford to sign Max in the off season.

          Reply
        • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

          4 years ago

          Me

          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          4 years ago

          @jimthegoat – Scherzer literally just said he prefers the West Coast.

          Reply
        • LordD99

          4 years ago

          His take makes more sense than the OP’s.

          Reply
      • Ya'll a bunch of salty crybabies

        4 years ago

        He will when they fail to win a WS……..again

        2
        Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          4 years ago

          Scherzer has a ring???

          Reply
      • A'sfaninUK

        4 years ago

        @bucsfan0004 – wow, you nailed it. Kudos!

        Reply
      • Pads Fans

        4 years ago

        From what the article is saying now he prefers to be traded to the west coast.

        Reply
    • Samuel

      4 years ago

      They didn’t do that with Harper when Rizzo had a trade worked out with the Astros.

      1
      Reply
      • Deleted Userrr

        4 years ago

        Maybe the Lerners have lerned (hee hee) from their mistakes.

        8
        Reply
        • Stormintazz

          4 years ago

          I see what you did there.

          Reply
      • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

        4 years ago

        @Samuel

        Harper wanted that to happen too. He said trade me and then resign me but they didn’t want to trade him for some reason. I would love to hear why they didn’t. Anyone know?

        1
        Reply
    • LATrolleyDodger

      4 years ago

      For real, when has this situation happened?

      2
      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        For real, when has a player ever refused to sign with a team specifically BECAUSE they traded him?

        Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        Are you just not going to answer?

        Reply
      • fs54

        4 years ago

        Cliff Lee and Phillies!

        2
        Reply
      • catonfarm

        4 years ago

        Aroldis Chapman NYY resigned him after trading him to the Cubs

        3
        Reply
        • LATrolleyDodger

          4 years ago

          Thats a good one I forgot about that. It’s a rarity though

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @OriginalDodger nowhere near as rare as a player refusing to sign with a team specifically BECAUSE they traded him.

          Reply
    • Francys01

      4 years ago

      To the Giants. He would pitch great for them.

      7
      Reply
      • BlueSkies_LA

        4 years ago

        But not so well for anyone else. The stuff you can learn here!

        3
        Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          4 years ago

          The best pitcher will only pitch well for one team lol ok

          Reply
        • BartoloHRball

          4 years ago

          One of the best pitchers (in MLB)….the best is deGrom based on the stats.

          1
          Reply
    • Al Hirschen

      4 years ago

      LFGM

      1
      Reply
    • Alex Bregman

      4 years ago

      Just like they failed to trade Bryce for nothing and then get him back?
      What’s next? You calling the Guardians best name ever?

      1
      Reply
    • ChiSox_Fan

      4 years ago

      Sox Keuchel giving up way too many HR’s!!!

      Go acquire Scherzer!!!!

      1
      Reply
    • AshamedMethGoat

      4 years ago

      Yeah, just like Red Sox fans thought about John Lester.

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        Cubs offered Lester $20m more than the Red Sox. He would have signed with the Cubs anyway.

        Reply
  2. Biff Tanner

    4 years ago

    Astros swoop in for Verlander the Sequel

    9
    Reply
    • LATrolleyDodger

      4 years ago

      You really think he will waive his NTC for the Asstros?

      5
      Reply
      • Colt 45

        4 years ago

        Verlander would be happy to tell him how awesome it is here, for pitchers like him.

        2
        Reply
      • jjd002

        4 years ago

        Why wouldn’t he? Not like most of the teams weren’t doing the same stuff…. Players don’t care about it – fans and media are the only people that care.

        8
        Reply
        • Chief Two Hands

          4 years ago

          A lot of players, including guys like Trout, openly blasted the Astros for what they did. And no, most other team was not doing what they did with electronics, etc. The players absolutely cared bout it. To hear the criticism from players across MLB, only the Astros engaged in their specific brand of cheating. To say otherwise is simply ignorance or blind bias, or both.

          6
          Reply
        • jjd002

          4 years ago

          Have you not heard the players and former players say exactly what I said? I mean the A’s even had a player say the same thing over the all star break. You have to be extremely ignorant or just straight up refusing to use common sense to think Houston was the only team. It’s no different than the PED era.

          3
          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 years ago

          Two teams other than the Astros were fined for doing it in 2017, the Yankees, where the system the Astros used came from and had been in use since 2015, and the Red Sox. Beyond those 3, the Commissioner said that 9 other teams were also found to have been using a similar system, That is 12 of 30 that we know for sure that were using an electronic sign stealing system.

          7
          Reply
    • The Baseball Fan

      4 years ago

      Last I checked Houston is not the west coast…

      1
      Reply
  3. Pete'sView

    4 years ago

    Scherzer is a must for the Giants, and I’m sure they’re not the only team that will pitch hard for him (Dodgers, I’m sure). But with an extension—even at his age—he’s the guy SF must snag.

    1
    Reply
    • LATrolleyDodger

      4 years ago

      I think Dodgers get him over Giants

      1
      Reply
      • Baseball 1600

        4 years ago

        I’m thinking Dodgers go for Berrios, Pads get Gibson or Gallo or both, Giants get one of Scherzer or Duffy

        1
        Reply
        • LATrolleyDodger

          4 years ago

          The Dodgers won’t let a guy like Scherzer go if they can get him.

          1
          Reply
        • Pete'sView

          4 years ago

          Well, the difference between Scherzer and Duffy is so astronomical that I think—if SF strikes out with Scherzer—they go for someone more substantial (and less fragile) than Duffy.

          2
          Reply
        • damascusj

          4 years ago

          Well they still owe Bauer, and would have to pay his 6 years of deferred money to get him for one season, I dunno if that sounds too appetizing

          Reply
        • BeforeMcCourt

          4 years ago

          – the nationals do not magically lose the deferred money from past seasons. There’s no reason to think a team will have to take on deferred money from past seasons, unless it’s to limit the prospect cost

          Reply
      • cleve1969

        4 years ago

        Astros get him …

        2
        Reply
    • DODGER JR

      4 years ago

      The Giants aren’t going to extend Max in the off season. They have a ton of horrible contracts and they won’t spend big to sign anyone.

      Reply
      • Noel1982

        4 years ago

        Incorrect their payroll is set to drop below 100 million this off season ! Agree though they want get mad max or sign him

        Reply
      • tedtheodorelogan

        4 years ago

        Longoria is the only player on the roster who might be view as having a bad contract going forward, and he was playing great before he got hurt. Perhaps La Stella is a bad contract, but a big market team can handle 2 mid-level deals that aren’t great. They could totally afford to extend Max at 35MM a year.

        1
        Reply
      • vtadave

        4 years ago

        Which horrible contracts are you talking about?

        Reply
      • Pete'sView

        4 years ago

        Dodger Jr — You are not paying attention.

        Reply
      • VTGiant

        4 years ago

        TOTALLY wrong, as usual… Crawford, Belt, Posey etc are off the books THIS year.

        A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

        1
        Reply
  4. Altuves Buzzer

    4 years ago

    Anywhere but Boston or the Padres

    4
    Reply
    • Ryan W

      4 years ago

      Random combo

      7
      Reply
    • bostonbob

      4 years ago

      Agreed, we don’t want him in Boston or his crying ass, big breasted bimbo wife. We good thanks

      Reply
      • 802Ghost

        4 years ago

        Big breasts you said?

        3
        Reply
      • Marc Downs

        4 years ago

        everyone google’s Max’s wife. Yep, big boobs.

        1
        Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 years ago

          No. Not really. images.app.goo.gl/h2uoW9H9rcJ5Qxng9

          Reply
  5. 44McCovey

    4 years ago

    The radio here is floating a rumor that the Giants are trading Joey Bart & Will Wilson to the Twins for Berrios & Buxton.

    1
    Reply
    • Samuel

      4 years ago

      Wil be happy to return to reality and sanity in 6 days.

      3
      Reply
    • VTGiant

      4 years ago

      I’ll take that one

      1
      Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      it’ll take more than that

      4
      Reply
    • Pete'sView

      4 years ago

      That’s an interesting move, and would be excellent for both teams, although Buxton can’t generally stay healthy.

      1
      Reply
    • rememberthecoop

      4 years ago

      I’ll have what he’s having.

      5
      Reply
    • MC Tim C

      4 years ago

      Matos would be heading to Minnesota in a Berrios deal. Some people on here have serious blinders on when it comes to their teams. Like Yankees fans wanting to ship out Frazier, Andujar and Garcia in every trade lol.

      3
      Reply
      • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

        4 years ago

        He said that’s what he heard on the radio. He’s not just recommending a trade

        Reply
    • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

      4 years ago

      I’ll take Buxton. I haven’t looked into Berrios enough to say yay or nay for him

      Reply
    • LordD99

      4 years ago

      Turn the radio off.

      Reply
  6. Samuel

    4 years ago

    Boras will work something out with Lerner. They’ve quite probably been on it for weeks. They have a great relationship.

    Reply
  7. angt222

    4 years ago

    Scherzer has been worth every penny of his contract with Washington. They should allow him to pitch for a contender this postseason.

    7
    Reply
    • VonPurpleHayes

      4 years ago

      Absolutely great signing.

      3
      Reply
  8. Mike_99

    4 years ago

    I think the astros are working on a trade with Home Depot for 3 three trash cans

    26
    Reply
    • Deleted Userrr

      4 years ago

      Bazinga!

      1
      Reply
    • mlbdodgerfan2015

      4 years ago

      It’s going to an absolute zoo next week when the Astros head to Dodger Stadium. Trash cans galore.

      2
      Reply
      • Colt 45

        4 years ago

        bread and circuses for the plebes, my man. I have nothing but respect and admiration for Dodgers, including the current well-constructed unit, the Orel-led Astro nemesis of the 80s, and the great teams of the 70s, 60s, and 50s. Not to forget that epic 3-game then 4-game series against us to end the 1980 regular season.

        Since opening day 2015, Astros & Dodgers are, by FAR, the greatest teams in MLB.

        You were beaten by a GREAT team, in 2017; I hope we cream you this weekend, just to shut everybody up.

        And I would LOVE a rematch, this October.

        4
        Reply
        • tstats

          4 years ago

          You might be the only astros fan I like. It’ll be great when Correa ends up a dodger

          1
          Reply
        • Chief Two Hands

          4 years ago

          A cheating team in 2017.

          2
          Reply
        • Colt 45

          4 years ago

          Correa becomes Dodger :

          “WTF WE LOVE CARLOS CORREA NOW!!!!!!”

          1
          Reply
        • Colt 45

          4 years ago

          tell that to the ’51 Giants, my good man.

          Meanwhile, Astros are smoking most of MLB, again, in W/L %, again, and in overall offense, again, by virtue of the Future Pitch Simulator AI Chip they all have installed in their crania.

          2
          Reply
        • DODGER JR

          4 years ago

          There is NO CHANCE IN HELL that Correa comes to the Dodgers. The Dodger players already want to get rid of Trevor Bauer for being an abuser so there is no way they want a guy that helped cheat against them to cost LA a WS Championship.

          Reply
        • Colt 45

          4 years ago

          LOL!
          Orioles hired our guy as their GM, Tigers hired our manager, Red sox have Cora and Marwin (after Twins), Jays have Springer & Teoscar (and did have Giles), White Sox have Keuchel, Rays have McHugh, and did have Morton, who is now a Brave, Padres have Musgrove whom they got from Pirates, Indians own Peacock, Devinski on IL for Arizona, who are also paying Reddick, Nats have Will Harris, Mets have JD Davis, Cubs have Marisnick, Angels have Stassi, A’s have Tony Kemp post Cubs, you guys ran Tyler White through your clubhouse with no ill effects on team feelz, Brewers picked up Derek Fisher post Jays, Pirates have Moran, and 6 different teams have trotted out Maybin.

          Several other players are currently with other organizations, and the number of Luhnow acolytes filling other front offices is legion.

          2
          Reply
        • astros2017

          4 years ago

          Betts, Mookie

          1
          Reply
        • jjd002

          4 years ago

          Didn’t Betts and Joe Kelly play for Boston before LA?

          1
          Reply
  9. Gmen777

    4 years ago

    I think he ends up on one of the three NL West teams tbh

    3
    Reply
  10. LATrolleyDodger

    4 years ago

    Dodgers have to be ALL over this one. The Bauer situation is looking worse and they need starting pitching!! What would it take for Scherzer to come to the Dodgers?

    3
    Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      4 years ago

      An extension, I imagine. Give him the money they had committed to Bauer. The Nats would demand at least one top-shelf prospect, but it would be worth it.

      1
      Reply
      • LATrolleyDodger

        4 years ago

        I’m all for that money going to Max. He is worth it! Even at his age. Just don’t see a “Verlander” type trade being fumbled by the Dodgers this time around. I wonder if the Dodgers would also still be in on Berrios. Also, what does that mean for Gonsolin? Dude hasn’t pitched more than 4 innings yet (I didn’t catch his last start tho). A rotation of Buehler, Urias, Kershaw, Scherzer, May/Berrios is excellent!

        Reply
      • stymeedone

        4 years ago

        Problem is that money is still committed to Bauer. Dodgers are still on the hook for that contract.

        1
        Reply
        • LATrolleyDodger

          4 years ago

          With the situation, what can Dodgers do to work around that? I really don’t know what happens if you’re suspended by the league and a team has agreed to a salary. I still can’t believe they signed Bauer for 100m/3 years. I’m hoping a trade for Scherzer can still work!

          Reply
        • Chief Two Hands

          4 years ago

          The Dodgers are committed to that contract for now, but that could change.

          Reply
        • tbonenats

          4 years ago

          Unless Bauer goes to jail they are unlikely to get out of his deal. Even then it isn’t a lock.

          1
          Reply
      • Simodine

        4 years ago

        The only way the dodgers don’t pay that to Bauer is if he is in jail. Even if suspended it won’t be for 3 years. So the dodger betree hope he goes to jail.

        2
        Reply
        • LATrolleyDodger

          4 years ago

          Still, I don’t understand how a team is obligated to pay out a salary when the player did this to themselves? He put himself in the situation regardless. In his first presser he said he wouldn’t be a distraction to the team. Like I said, I’m not privy to how all of the financials work if he’s suspended. Not sure if he will do jail time, but it’s looking more likely that Dodgers won’t see Bauer pitch in a long time

          Reply
        • Simodine

          4 years ago

          It’s called a strong players union.

          Reply
        • mlbdodgerfan2015

          4 years ago

          Doesn’t seem like he’ll do any jail time. I’d be shocked based on what is out there. But a very good chance he’s still suspended and Dodgers probably still on the hook. Even if he’s not suspended it would be such a PR nightmare to play him not to mention the awkwardness and anger in the clubhouse with teammates.

          2
          Reply
        • LATrolleyDodger

          4 years ago

          I’m all for a union and players rights but when we are talking about domestic violence and crime, it’s tough to protect someone. I totally understand that the union is what is keeping these players afloat. Honestly, these are very complicated situations.

          1
          Reply
        • LATrolleyDodger

          4 years ago

          Yeah there’s reports that Dodger players are not comfortable with Bauer going forward, let alone play with him. I don’t think he will do jail time either but that doesn’t mean he isn’t culpable and did something horrific to someone.

          2
          Reply
        • dodgerfan83

          4 years ago

          If they actually suspend him instead of administrative leave, dodgers are off the hook for all the games he is suspended for.

          2
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Suspension will be over before the 2023 season is over and he’s not opting out.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          @ dodgerfan83 Thanks for knowing the answer when so many did not. My prediction is a lengthy suspension (at least 100 games) and the Dodgers paying him some part of his remaining options to make him go away.

          2
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BlueSkies_LA the Dodgers can’t “make” him do anything. Minus whatever he loses from his suspension he’s getting every penny that contract says he’s entitled to.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          Someone is pretending to know what’s in his contract who has no idea what’s in his contract. The recently linked LA Times article would be a good starting point for understanding this.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BlueSkies_LA what’s in his contract is $102m which he’s getting every penny of, minus whatever he loses from the inevitable suspension. He is probably facing a lengthy suspension but if the Pirates can’t void Felipe Vazquez’s contract there’s no way the Dodgers can void Bauer’s contract.

          2
          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          It doesn’t have to be “voided.” Maybe you should have read my comment more carefully, and the LA Times article as well. A direct link for the linkless:

          latimes.com/sports/dodgers/story/2021-07-25/trevor…

          2
          Reply
        • 5TUNT1N

          4 years ago

          I believe someone referenced it earlier but it is part of the CBA specific to domestic violence added in by mlb. It says the contracts cannot be voided if the player is caught in this scenario which is agreed to by both the players and owners under current agreements. Like the pirates fan said above if the pirates HAD to pay Vazquez there is NO way the dodgers dodge that contract.

          Too bad they didn’t vette him as well as they thought, he’s been a emotional player a bit of a loose canon his entire time in the league previous to the dodgers. It will be interesting to see what Friedmans explanation is that we can expect according to Kasten.

          I also find it odd that the dodger players now have issue with domestic violence in the clubhouse since Urias also had his own recent go with it, maybe it’s the players fighting back saying they won’t allow ownership to keep paying these guys.

          Who knows it’ll be interesting because he will have the suspension extended no matter what since he pushed the court date back into August so why would they bring him back prior Unless they were 100% sure they were in the clear which is impossible. Also I believe in the article it says the Victim is calling 3 police officers to testify, that doesn’t have great optics from my angle for the player and the team.

          3
          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          The Pirates are not paying Vazquez for as long as he is on the restricted list, which will be for the duration of his contract.

          We don’t know yet how long a suspension Bauer will serve (I have my own guess) but to avoid paying him the balance of his contract the Dodgers don’t need to dodge anything. They only need grounds enough to make a contract violation arguable. Then the lawyers get together and figure something out. Contracts are broken this way all the time. That’s why I said they pay him off for a part of his extensions. If Bauer believes he can rebuild his career after this he won’t want to be tied to a team that won’t play him anyway. We’ll see. A lot of other things have to happen first.

          Yeah, Kasten and Friedman at some point should admit that they blew it on the vetting. It would be honest and go a long way towards making this embarrassing mess up to Dodgers fans, but I have zero expectations that it will happen.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BlueSkies_LA Here is what the article you linked says.

          “Bauer’s contract is not publicly available, so whatever grounds the Dodgers might have to void it are unknown. However, the standard player contract allows a team to terminate a deal should the player ‘fail, refuse or neglect to conform his personal conduct to the standards of good citizenship and good sportsmanship.'”

          There is no precedent for a team actually doing this. Not even the Pirates with Felipe Vazquez. If the Dodgers try to I imagine they will get hit with a grievance from the MLBPA.

          1
          Reply
        • LATrolleyDodger

          4 years ago

          Urias was in public and shoved his gf down apparently and that was it (never condoning that but that’s what happened) and Bauer had two known sexual encounters that allegedly resulted in unconsciousness and sever injury. I don’t think you can compare the two. I agree that if the Pirates are still on the hook for FV then most likely Dodgers will have to honor the contract and commitment, although isn’t there something about the restricted list as well? Bauer’s situation is tough to assess. If there’s any way to drop that contract outside of the suspension then that’s great. This is really hurting the Dodgers as an organization and team, the unwanted distraction, the hole in the rotation, the money, optics, and now the deadline is approaching and there’s a huge “what if”. I hope the right moves are made before it’s too late!

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BlueSkies_LA “If Bauer believes he can rebuild his career after this he won’t want to be tied to a team that won’t play him anyway.”

          No, he knows his career is over. If the Dodgers (who employ another domestic abuser in Julio Urias) want nothing to do with him why would another team? He’s going to fight tooth and nail to collect every last penny of the contract he signed in February.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @OriginalDodger Are you ever going to answer my question of when has a player ever refused to sign with a team specifically BECAUSE they traded him?

          Reply
        • tbonenats

          4 years ago

          There is no way for the Dodgers to void the deal. Bauer would not settle. He isn’t that type.

          Reply
        • 1984wasntamanual

          4 years ago

          People keep talking about jail time…he hasn’t been charged or even arrested for a crime yet. Do people understand that civil and criminal are different things?

          Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 years ago

          Its called innocent until proven guilty. He’s still getting paid while on this administrative leave.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          Nice try Perry Mason, but this is not a trial. The decision on a suspension will be made under the terms of the joint policy, same as it was for the previous dozen or so cases.

          1
          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          We have now heard from a close personal friend. What else do you know about his innermost thoughts? Do tell.

          Reply
        • 5TUNT1N

          4 years ago

          Wasn’t Vazquez under arbitration still? Aka 1 year contract? Just curious how it works on multi year contracts differently also thanks for pointing out my failure to mention the non paid suspension again(which he currently is not on but likely will be if the league finds evidence).

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          No, his arb years were bought out by the Pirates in 2018 with a four year contract, plus two years of club options.

          Reply
        • TheFamousMrKing

          4 years ago

          RemovePitcherWinsFromTheRecordBooks- In reference to calling Urias a “domestic abuser”, I’m not sure that’s fair. The story I heard was he was arguing with his GF in a parking lot, she tried to leave, he put his arm out to stop her, she walked into it and fell, the cops were called, and others said what it looked like. She corroborated his story and it was dropped.
          Calling someone a domestic abuser when they’re not is not an ok thing to do.
          bleacherreport.com/articles/2839329-dodgers-julio-…

          2
          Reply
      • damascusj

        4 years ago

        That money is still committed to Bauer, you know

        Reply
        • DODGER JR

          4 years ago

          Not if Bauer violated his contract then he can get cut with no pay.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          He didn’t violate his contract

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          And you know this, how exactly?

          Reply
        • Colt 45

          4 years ago

          He doesn’t, but that NEVER stops him from posting drivel anyway.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @Nuanced Jamesian and this is coming from you, the defender of the pitcher win stat? LOL

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BlueSkies_LA See 5TUNT1N’s comment above

          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 years ago

          latimes.com/sports/dodgers/story/2021-07-25/trevor…

          1
          Reply
    • DODGER JR

      4 years ago

      Ruiz the Catcher to start.

      Reply
    • Zerbs63

      4 years ago

      Dodgers will void Bauer’s contract and get Max

      Reply
  11. Gwynning

    4 years ago

    Balmy 69 degrees and gorgeous waves rolling into La Jolla right meow…

    7
    Reply
    • vtadave

      4 years ago

      Niiice.

      3
      Reply
  12. Monkey’s Uncle

    4 years ago

    Scherzer has absolutely earned the right to be able to dictate where he goes. The Nationals would be wise to continue to be very transparent with their handling of Max. It could help them get him back this offseason if they trade him, and it could also help in their pursuit of other free agents if he didn’t return.

    Reply
    • Pete'sView

      4 years ago

      I don’t see why any team woud give up much—even for Scherzer—if he’s simply a rental. I’m sure the Giants wouldn’t. But if an extension can be reached (as the press has suggested must happen) I think the Giants are all over him.

      Reply
    • differentbears

      4 years ago

      He’s literally earned the right, what with the 10 and 5 rights he has based on his tenure.

      Thus there’s no need to worry about how to handle Scherzer offers, the Nationals can just ask him what teams he’d be willing to play for, and if those teams call on him, go from there.

      1
      Reply
  13. tedtheodorelogan

    4 years ago

    Who pays the 100MM in deferred money? Has to be the Nats, right?

    1
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      4 years ago

      As of now, yes, 100%. This money can be part of any barter between clubs, though. Pay more to send less, wink wink.

      Reply
    • hyraxwithaflamethrower

      4 years ago

      As with everything, it’s negotiable, but the less the Nats pay, the less their prospect return. I think they pay all of the deferred and part of this year’s remainder to get better prospects.

      Reply
      • SwingtheFNbat

        4 years ago

        Hyrax, I believe you nailed it. No team is paying any part of his contract past this year.

        Reply
  14. BeeVeeTee

    4 years ago

    It is going to be interesting to see if the Nationals trade Scherzer in the next few days. This all depends on certain teams that are at the Luxury Tax Threshold or already above it or have room not go over it can pull off a deal for both sides. Teams like the Astros Padres, Red Sox and Yankees who are looking for a player at Scherzer’s caliber are just under the threshold where picking up him and the reminder of his contract for the season would put them over it. In the mean time, the Dodgers are already above the threshold while are indeed of a pitcher can be on the move for Scherzer while this all depends on Bauer’s situation. A team like the White Sox are well under the threshold and picking up Scherzer for the remainder of the year would not put them over it.

    In all reality the Nationals are looking to get the best available deal for Scherzer while all of the teams above have something to offer on their MLB roster and farm systems. All we could do is stay tune to see what happens but it seems Scherzer is staying with the Nationals. Who knows what is going to happen and if Scherzer wants one more chance to win one more World Series.

    Reply
    • Colt 45

      4 years ago

      Astros have said that IF they’re going into tax territory, they’re gonna go BIG into tax territory.

      Reply
      • BeeVeeTee

        4 years ago

        I can see the Astros being on Scherzer which can put them over the top with a great front of the line rotation in the playoffs. If the Astros pull of this move this is more telling Greinke we are trying to get you that ring.

        1
        Reply
      • BeforeMcCourt

        4 years ago

        Isn’t that the lie to tell your fan base? Then you get to say… Welp, it wasn’t really worth it and look like you tried

        Reply
        • Colt 45

          4 years ago

          That’s not how the Astros roll.

          Reply
    • Central Valley

      4 years ago

      Giants? They have plenty of $ to spend, coming off of the books.

      1
      Reply
  15. padresfan111323

    4 years ago

    Shouldn’t even be a discussion for nats. They’d get back an absolute embarrassment of riches if they traded him in a market so thin on pitching, and he’d probably just re-sign with them in the offseason. Their farm system sucks too, so they need the pieces they’d get for him.

    1
    Reply
    • jjd002

      4 years ago

      Not gonna get a haul for a rental. This isn’t the 90s anymore

      1
      Reply
      • Ronk325

        4 years ago

        Maybe not a “haul” but the Nationals aren’t giving up Scherzer unless they’re getting a blue chipper plus a couple high upside prospects

        Reply
        • tikemrout

          4 years ago

          The only way that happens is if they eat the $100MM and throw in other pieces

          Reply
        • BeforeMcCourt

          4 years ago

          Once again. The 100M isn’t attached to him unless it’s negotiated in. It’s past money

          Reply
    • Pete'sView

      4 years ago

      The Nats are not going to get “an absolute embarrassment of riches” UNLESS Scherzer works out an extension with the team he’s traded to. Neither the Dodgers, nor Giants, nor Pads are gutting their system for a rental.

      3
      Reply
      • damascusj

        4 years ago

        I think we all are severely underestimating how much Rizzo will give up for one top100 prospect or so.

        Reply
  16. CardsFan77

    4 years ago

    Say what you will but IF the cardinals are pushing for top end pitching (I’m not sure they are this year) this is a no doubt situation that Mad Max finishes his career in STL. He will bend more to go there because of his roots.. he has said he wanted to be a cardinal before in his career. We shall see

    Reply
    • msqboxer

      4 years ago

      This topic has come up in STL many times…the fact is he has no more connection to STL than any other place because his family has moved away from STL a long time ago.

      Reply
  17. Sideline Redwine

    4 years ago

    Let me guess: “Frazier, Andujar, and a low-level prospect should get this done.”

    11
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      4 years ago

      Add Gardy to make it a real Big Apple Party!

      2
      Reply
    • jjd002

      4 years ago

      And if not it’s because people just don’t want to trade with the Yankees.

      1
      Reply
    • jjd002

      4 years ago

      Well that trade offer was just thrown in the Turner post.

      1
      Reply
  18. Perksy

    4 years ago

    Since he is a free agent after this year and if he gets trades how does the differed money work?

    Reply
    • Gwynning

      4 years ago

      All circumstantial to any deal. Can be bartered upon… or not.

      Reply
    • differentbears

      4 years ago

      I’d guess the deferred money would still be paid by the Nationals, regardless of who pays Scherzer the rest of the year. Bobby Bonilla’s deferred money is paid by the Mets, even though he played for quite a few teams after his time in New York.

      Reply
  19. titanic struggle

    4 years ago

    Wow…let’s see the Kings randsom..

    Reply
  20. AJBraun

    4 years ago

    Scherzer Padres, mark that Sh*t down… The Pads are going to go all in with the dodgers floundering.

    3
    Reply
    • LATrolleyDodger

      4 years ago

      Keep dreaming!

      Reply
      • damascusj

        4 years ago

        Are you saying that you don’t expect this to happen? Preller has shown to be willing to pull the trigger on big trades

        Reply
    • BeeVeeTee

      4 years ago

      The Padres better expect to give up Paddack as the main piece in that trade.

      Reply
      • damascusj

        4 years ago

        They totally would

        Reply
      • tbonenats

        4 years ago

        Why would the Nats wand Paddack? He’s been a mess since his solid rookie year?

        1
        Reply
    • differentbears

      4 years ago

      Dodgers have the second best record in the NL, third best in MLB, and are closer to the Giants in first than they are to the Padres in third. If that’s floundering…

      1
      Reply
    • BeforeMcCourt

      4 years ago

      Exactly how are the dodgers floundering? Lmao they have a 67% chance to get the division per fangraphs

      Reply
  21. berniebrewers mustache ride

    4 years ago

    Brewers.

    Reply
  22. nyy17 2

    4 years ago

    Scherzer had a career quite buena,
    Hey, Camarena

    3
    Reply
  23. Camden453

    4 years ago

    Well for Scherzer you have to ante up a legitimate top-ish prospect. The Rays and Padres have the deeper systems and are more likely to be willing to part with a prospect

    3
    Reply
    • iverbure

      4 years ago

      Why even bring up the rays when it comes to Max Scherzer???

      Reply
  24. STLFann

    4 years ago

    Grew up a block away from him in St. Louis. He wants to come to the cardinals in the off-season

    Reply
    • Chief Two Hands

      4 years ago

      Can’t argue with that logic.

      2
      Reply
  25. Central Valley

    4 years ago

    Kevin Gausman had been shaky lately, can’t see him being our #1 going into the playoffs.

    1
    Reply
  26. Tiger_diesel92

    4 years ago

    And the Yankees acquired Trevor story per John heyman

    Reply
    • Simodine

      4 years ago

      No, they made an offer with no current traction.

      1
      Reply
  27. bobtillman

    4 years ago

    I heard he only waives the no-trade to go to Pittsburgh.

    2
    Reply
    • Datashark

      4 years ago

      no way Arizona has his number ready

      Reply
  28. Datashark

    4 years ago

    Dodgers will offer him an extension for huge money, as their deep pockets will play here….that is the only reason I think Giants don’t get him.

    But will Giants offer up Minor talent that will sacrifice future, and Are the Dodgers willing to give up front line prospect as well as their upper level talent pool is less deep than Giants.

    Dodgers would have to offer at least one of the likes of: Ruiz, Busch, Pepiot
    Giants would have to offer at least one of likes of: Bart, Ramos, Kilian

    I cannot see Giants offering the type of high dollars and more than 3 years extension.

    Reply
    • Simodine

      4 years ago

      If max is traded it won’t be for a top 50 prospect. 2 month rentals aren’t being traded for those type of prospects anymore.

      It would be 3/4 guys in the 5-20 range. That’s how deals are done now.

      4
      Reply
      • Camden453

        4 years ago

        I get your point but for a bidding war on Scherzer you’re probably going to need one legitimate prospect 4-6 in your system

        This is a highly prized ace on the market. You’re probably going to need your #4 prospect, something in the 15-20 range and then a lower end prospect

        2
        Reply
        • Pete'sView

          4 years ago

          But NOT if it’s only a rental.

          1
          Reply
        • Datashark

          4 years ago

          Additionally, agent Scott Boras has previously suggested that Scherzer would require some type of incentive (e.g. a contract extension) in order to waive those rights.

          NOT A RENTAL….BORAS knows $$$$$$

          2
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @Datashark Boras already backpedaled that statement. And a Scherzer extension at this point would basically be a market rate deal. Not the type of thing that boosts his trade value.

          Reply
  29. msqboxer

    4 years ago

    The luxury tax comes in to play on this one..some are over and may not care for the remainder of the year….some refuse to go over and a few contenders have the room. Those who think he’ll resign with the Nats are delusional…he’ll sign somewhere he has a chance to win WS.

    3
    Reply
  30. StPeteStingRays

    4 years ago

    No way the Rays trade for Cruz…And then, Boomstick is ours.
    No way the Rays trade for Max…Shhhh, let me dream!

    1
    Reply
    • iverbure

      4 years ago

      They won’t, just stop dreaming.

      1
      Reply
  31. Colt 45

    4 years ago

    Interestingly, the Astros could offer a quality, young, controllable, MLB starting pitcher if they wanted to pull this off

    Reply
  32. Adampunk13

    4 years ago

    Whatever team scherzer goes to will win the world series. Then he will resign with the nats

    Reply
  33. Dw24

    4 years ago

    What if the Yankees offer Clark Schmidt or Devi Garcia , Luis Gil and Alexander Vargas (#,2/3, #5 and # 13 . They can have miggy or Frazier but not sure they have much value currently . I am assuming a negotiating window was guaranteed ( ie extension ) . Seems like a lot in prospects so maybe it’s close no idea .

    Reply
    • theodore glass

      4 years ago

      Why do Yankees fans keep bringing up Andujar and Frazier in every trade scenario. No one wants them.

      4
      Reply
      • basquiat

        4 years ago

        Because Yankee fans think they are entitled to any good player who comes on the market, no matter what trash they offer in return.

        4
        Reply
        • ChiSoxCity

          4 years ago

          Add Dodgers, Red Sox, and Giants fans to the list. I’m so sick of the entitlement in sports these days. It’s like there’s not supposed to be any competition whatsoever.

          Reply
        • tstats

          4 years ago

          Are you the one that was trading “prospects” for stars?

          Reply
        • whyhayzee

          4 years ago

          The Red Sox have traded Moncada, Kopech, Betts, Price, Benintendi, Andrew Miller, Jalen Beeks, Heath Hembree, Workman to get the team they have. The only high profile free agent was JD Martinez. They haven’t really taken advantage of anyone. Many of their players are from their own system. Yes, they are a big market team with a high payroll. But I don’t think entitlement applies to them. Success? Definitely. Spoiled fans? Sure. But for those of us who have been through 60 years of them, we’re just happy when they’re good because that’s not an expectation all the time.

          Reply
  34. tidybowlman

    4 years ago

    Is there a really rich owner anywhere who could cover a lot of his differed money right away?

    Reply
    • tidybowlman

      4 years ago

      Deffered! I can’t spell

      Reply
      • StPeteStingRays

        4 years ago

        Strike 2

        Reply
    • Simodine

      4 years ago

      Yes but nobody will.

      1
      Reply
      • sergefunction

        4 years ago

        Third time is hopefully the charm, Tidy. Try again.

        1
        Reply
  35. sergefunction

    4 years ago

    Can someone with a rich intellect and a kindly, sharing nature please explain why it’s such a given to so many that Maximillian re-signs with Washington? I don’t see that happening.

    St. Louis for one seems a better personal option for him in about every way. Not to mention some others that tend to pay straight up cash.

    Reply
    • LordD99

      4 years ago

      It’s a fan thing. Since they love their team, they assume Mad Max must equally, if not more so, love their team. The problem with this thinking is Scherzer will likely get traded to a contender, like one of the Sox’s, or to lovely San Diego, or to some other team likely to contend and give him several more shots at a World Series title, and this new team likely won’t pull any deferred-payment shenanigans, so Maximillian will likely have delivered his last pitch for the Nats if he’s traded this week. Nats fans don’t want to acknowledge this, because fans are fanatics.

      1
      Reply
  36. charper32

    4 years ago

    I wish St Louis would trade for him but our GM only likes low hanging fruit as he says.

    Reply
  37. usafcop

    4 years ago

    Brewers are in on Scherzer….imagine a rotation in the playoffs of Scherzer….Burnes….Woodruff and Peralta….damn….

    Reply
  38. Oldschoolandthemets1980

    4 years ago

    Would I love the rumors to be true and he lands in Queens of course, but definitely dont see that happen. My gut says Houston or Boston or Toronto pulled the wool over everyone and acquires mad Max.

    Reply
  39. BlueSkies_LA

    4 years ago

    I know what the article said. As I pointed out already, the comparison to Vazquez is moot. He is on the restricted list and consequently is not being paid. As for precedents, I wouldn’t worry about them too much. My guess is the lawyers are huddled right now talking about this entire ball of wax.

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Also, there’s no way Bauer accepts a settlement so that he can “try to rehab his career with another team.” Like, he knows he’s done.

      Reply
      • BlueSkies_LA

        4 years ago

        Another close personal friend who knows his innermost thoughts?

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Leave the snark to those of us who are good at it buddy.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          Let me know if you find anyone.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Will do.

          Reply
  40. aussiegiants53

    4 years ago

    At this stage of his career I’m sure he would want to go to a contender and play October baseball, then he can reassess in the offseason what to do. Plenty of teams will come calling and he will pick where he wants to go, he deserves that, but it’s still a business and the Nats will still want a good return. I can’t see him signing with them again, they won’t be competitive for a couple of years. Go get another ring Max

    Reply
  41. KD17

    4 years ago

    If Bloom grew a pair he’d get down on his knees and plead with ownership to spend the pro-rated portion of Scherzer’s salary so the Red Sox would have Sale and Scherzer for the playoffs. For all the Red Sox fans who are waiting for the pin to burst the balloon, getting Sale back, adding Houck and then picking up Scherzer would go a long way to keeping the inevitable collapse from happening.

    As a free agent next year, the owners can go back to pocketing their profits rather than re-investing in the team but at least a shot for a ring would exist. Without a significant pick-up it might be another 86 years until the next ring.

    Reply
    • Le Grande Orangerie

      4 years ago

      “inevitable collapse”. LOL!

      We are watching a reenactment of 2015/2016. In 2015 the Sox no-showed, just like last year, and instead of making the playoffs as expected, they finished far out. It happens. The O’s the same, and when you added in the unwillingness of MFY to go all in that year, it meant the Shamrocks won the division. LOL!

      After that fluke, the Sox returned the next year to win the division and the O’s bounced back as well.

      Last year, the Sox finished far below expectations again, and this year have plexiglassed themselves back into the Division lead.

      The Sox won’t win it all this year probably, but I don’t really care all that much,. They will go to the playoffs, and perhaps go deep. They are much more likely to win it all though, than they are to collapse.

      Reply
  42. usafcop

    4 years ago

    Brewers are in on Scherzer….their playoff rotation would be formidable if they pulled it off….

    Scherzer
    Woodruff
    Burnes
    Peralta

    If they go to a 3 man rotation Peralta can be a bullpen boost….

    1
    Reply
  43. msqboxer

    4 years ago

    I’m curious as to what everyone thinks their team would have to give up for the Nats to do a deal with them. Being a CWS fan if I’m Rizzo I’m asking for one of these three in return and another prospect. Kopech, Vaughn or Crochet. I don’t think Rizzo will do a deal unless he gets a controllable MLB player back. If I’m Rick Hahn I probably consider Vaughn, but not the other two.

    Reply
    • tbonenats

      4 years ago

      No way the Sox trade Vaughn. For Max they are looking at a fringe top 100 prospect type or a couple back end top 10 in the org type.

      Reply
  44. Stormintazz

    4 years ago

    Standard wording in MLB contracts in reference to Bauer.

    When teams have tried to void contracts in the past, they have relied on paragraph 7(b)1 of the uniform player’s contract, which states that a contract can be voided if a player “shall fail, refuse, or neglect to conform his personal conduct to the standards of good citizenship and good sportsmanship or keep himself in first-class physical condition.”

    Paragraph 3 (a), furthermore, states that “The player agrees to perform his services hereunder diligently and faithfully, to keep himself in first-class physical condition and to obey the club’s training rules, and pledges himself to the American public and to the club to conform to high standards of personal conduct, fair play and good sportsmanship.”

    1
    Reply
  45. LordD99

    4 years ago

    The $100MM deferred shouldn’t complicate the deal. All the deferred money was constructed to lower the Nats payments over the life of the contract. The overwhelmingly bulk of that obligation remains with the Nats. If he has any deferred in 2021, then a prorated portion (about 1/3rd of of the 2021 deferment) might be moved, or the Nats might absorb it fully for a better return. Seems minor, and could even be a plus for the acquiring team.

    1
    Reply
  46. creacher

    4 years ago

    As am acquiring team, it’s be cool if you could say screw the deferment and pay it to him up front. Nats deferals have always left a sour taste in my mouth. Smart for business and salary balancing no question about it

    Reply
  47. Central Valley

    4 years ago

    I don’t see Farhan Zaidi offering one of the Giants top prospects for two months of Max Scherzer, unless more players are involved. Scherzer alone, not happening.

    I see the Dodgers as the team that will ultimately acquire Scherzer.

    2
    Reply
  48. Robrock30

    4 years ago

    Is Max going to Dodgers for C Keibert Ruiz and RHP Clayton Beeter?

    Reply
  49. A'sfaninUK

    4 years ago

    200 comments from Cardinals and Yankees fans wetting their pants over a guy they have no prospect capital to acquire in the first place, then he says he prefers the West Coast – LMAO

    Priceless!!!

    2
    Reply
    • LordD99

      4 years ago

      There is approximately a single comment from a Yankee fan proposing a trade and a dozen comments from you.

      Priceless!

      2
      Reply
  50. Chris Hager

    4 years ago

    The Rays could actually be a possibility, with the remaining amount deferred.

    Reply
    • LordD99

      4 years ago

      …and the farm system to pull it off. The Nats might fully absorb the remaining deferred payments for a better return.

      The biggest challenge might be getting Scherzer to agree to go to Tampa if Boras plans to insist on an extension.

      Reply
  51. KozmosTerezniak

    4 years ago

    He has to be going to the NL West, and I wouldn’t be surprised if his decision is based on what happens in the Giants-Dodgers series this week.

    The Giants, Dodgers, and Padres can all make an offer that the Nats will accept, and Max is going to go where he has the best chance to win another ring.

    Reply
    • LordD99

      4 years ago

      All three teams will make the postseason.

      1
      Reply
    • Tatsumaki

      4 years ago

      Imagine max on dodgers….sheesh if they don’t win with bauer, max, buehler and kershaw they will be a joke

      1
      Reply
      • 16

        4 years ago

        lol, Bauer is not going to pitch for the Dodgers again this year and probably ever.

        2
        Reply
        • Tatsumaki

          4 years ago

          Bauer won’t be charged and la times is an opinion based outlet with little to no credibility. Educate yourself on basic law, there no case for defense. This is mlb trying to silence one of there biggest critics. Not hard to see

          Reply
  52. Jim Carter

    4 years ago

    I think you can rule out Oakland.

    Reply
  53. bigdaddyhacks

    4 years ago

    Let’s go Jerry dipotooooooooo

    1
    Reply
    • Slothcliff Hokum

      4 years ago

      Yes, get him on board, sign him to a one- or two-year deal. He’ll look great in the M’s rotation for a year or two while the kids develop in the minors, and might even help the M’s get to the playoffs this year and next year.

      Reply
  54. Poster formerly known as . . .

    4 years ago

    “However, Scherzer’s luxury tax number would also be around the $11.8MM mark, which is certainly a factor for teams trying to avoid a tax payment.”

    The Dodgers are one franchise too smart to let the luxury tax prevent them from winning. Apparently the folks in LA know how to count, and they realize that the value of a World Series win far outweighs the cost of paying the luxury tax. If I had to guess, I’d pick Dodger Stadium as Max’s most likely landing spot.

    1
    Reply
    • damascusj

      4 years ago

      Well they are still on the hook for Bauer, so some finagling is in order

      1
      Reply
      • Ancient Pistol

        4 years ago

        I’m sure there’s a clause in the contract about behavior/criminal indictment/etc.

        1
        Reply
        • FletcherFan66

          4 years ago

          I’m sure there’s a good behavior clause too, but he’s still getting paid and his court date isn’t for 3 weeks

          Reply
        • Ancient Pistol

          4 years ago

          The CBA probably requires paid suspensions in such cases till his actions would dictate the contract is void. Also, I’m sure the Dodgers would file a civil suit if the paid suspension last the remainder of the season and he’s behavior dictates the contract is in fact void during the offseason.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          The commissioner doesn’t have to wait for the court to make a decision on a suspension under the joint policy, and most likely he won’t, as that process could conceivably take months if not years. In fact the only thing the courts are looking at now is the restraining order, and it has little to no bearing on the issues that will be considered under the policy. Understand what’s in the policy and spend a lot less time thinking about the courts.

          1
          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          The joint policy calls for seven days of paid administrative leave, with extensions allowed if the union agrees to it. The union has agreed to two of them in this case, including another just today. The player remains on paid leave until/unless a suspension is ordered. The player then serves the suspension unpaid.

          Reply
      • Poster formerly known as . . .

        4 years ago

        I’m not sure about this, but I think they might be able to terminate Bauer’s contract if he’s convicted of sexual violence. This is from the CBA:

        7.(b) The Club may terminate this contract upon written notice to the Player (but only after requesting and obtaining waivers of this contract from all other Major League Clubs) if the Player shall at any time:

        (1) fail, refuse or neglect to conform his personal conduct to the
        standards of good citizenship and good sportsmanship or to keep himself in first-class physical condition or to obey the Club’s training rules; or

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @Mr. Person no team has ever voided a player’s contract on those grounds before. And it’s not as if there haven’t been opportunities.

          Reply
        • Poster formerly known as . . .

          4 years ago

          In 1994, the Braves voided Ron Gant’s contract after he was injured in the prohibited activity of riding a dirt bike. In 2004, the Yankees voided Aaron Boone’s contract when he was injured in the prohibited activity of a basketball game.

          I would think that, given the political climate surrounding Bauer’s alleged activity and the fact that MLB recently suspended Domingo German for the entire 2020 season when a league official witnessed him slapping his girlfriend, despite there having been no criminal charges, Bauer’s case might be the first where the “morals clause” could be used to successfully void his contract. I wouldn’t bet against the Dodgers if they go that route.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Yankees didn’t void German’s contract. Pirates didn’t void Felipe Vazquez’s contract (and Vazquez would have been the perfect opportunity to test this clause out)

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          Seems it needs to be mentioned around here about every five minutes or so or people will forget, but the law and the joint policy are not the same thing. As far as how this proceeds, I’d be looking more at the money climate than the political climate.

          Also needs to be mentioned every five minutes or so that the Pirates didn’t need to void Vazquez’s contract because they are not paying him anyway.

          Reply
    • JerseyShoreScore

      4 years ago

      Dodgers are way over the luxury tax threshold. They will be taxed significantly on the any dollars that are added to the current payroll. However, I do not believe they care. They will get under the cap in 2022 or 2023 to reset the penalty threshold percents….

      Reply
  55. Ancient Pistol

    4 years ago

    No Mets. No Rays. I predict the Dodgers if the Dodgers in fact want him.

    Reply
    • damascusj

      4 years ago

      I’m guessing padres, they got money back in the Frazier deal, ownership already said they are willing to exceed luxury tax, and Preller has shown willingness to make big moves.

      Plus they have the prospect capital to outbid the dodgers

      Reply
      • Dbird777

        4 years ago

        Unless SD gives up some of their top 4 then the rest of their system is a bunch of meh. That’s a narrative that’s well in need of being retired

        Reply
  56. Colt 45

    4 years ago

    “3:45pm: Scherzer would not approve a trade to the Mets, reports SNY’s Andy Martino, nor would the Nationals be open to trading Scherzer to the current NL East leaders.”

    Metsfan hardest hit.

    4
    Reply
    • VonPurpleHayes

      4 years ago

      “He doesn’t want to be a part of something special.” – MetsFan22

      9
      Reply
      • Joe It All

        4 years ago

        Ha you must have commented that as I was commenting.. that’s priceless

        2
        Reply
      • Colt 45

        4 years ago

        I actually kinda like MetsFan22, but could not resist posting that

        Reply
        • VonPurpleHayes

          4 years ago

          I like him too. Even though I sometimes argue with him. He’s just having fun.

          1
          Reply
      • BRUH.SF.BRUH

        4 years ago

        @Von lol clearly he doesn’t want to be on the best team in MLB history.

        Reply
    • Joe It All

      4 years ago

      I want to see how creative Metsfan22 will be to spin this one.

      4
      Reply
  57. birdsfan415

    4 years ago

    rip Mets

    1
    Reply
  58. norcalblue

    4 years ago

    Rosenthal: “Scherzer’s complex contract situation, as Scherzer’s deal contains a lot of deferred money. The roughly $11.8MM remaining of Scherzer’s $35MM salary for 2021 is entirely deferred until 2028, so a new team wouldn’t have to pay that money out for seven years. However, Scherzer’s luxury tax number would also be around the $11.8MM mark, which is certainly a factor for teams trying to avoid a tax payment. Scherzer has another $7.5MM in signing bonus money due this September, but Rosenthal notes that this bonus payment “is solely the Nationals’ obligation.”

    As I pointed out elsewhere, a team that doesn’t care about the money (perhaps they are already over the cap) might just pay all of Max’s salary for the remainder of the year and provide additional “cash considerations” to the Nats that would result in a lower cost in prospects. That team might have no interest in Max beyond the three plus months remaining in the season/playoffs….

    This approach might provide the Nats with additional incentive, presuming they want to resign Max this winter, to feel more comfortable trading Max away for a few months…

    Reply
  59. worthington

    4 years ago

    Can’t blame him not wanting to play for a slimy org like the Mets.

    1
    Reply
  60. SonnySteele

    4 years ago

    Any idea why Max would rule out the Mets?

    Reply
    • VonPurpleHayes

      4 years ago

      Probably doesn’t want to live in New York and/or play for a division rival.

      2
      Reply
    • Poster formerly known as . . .

      4 years ago

      His splits at Citi Field are great, so it’s not the venue.

      Maybe he’s put off by Mr. Met’s big head.

      Reply
    • Joel Peterson

      4 years ago

      Have you been to New York recently?

      Reply
      • Poster formerly known as . . .

        4 years ago

        Have you? I live in Manhattan and love it.

        Reply
  61. RockLowDown

    4 years ago

    Poor Mets fans . That one hurt

    2
    Reply
  62. Shrutefarm

    4 years ago

    Padres, Giants, and Dodgers all have the equity to trade for Scherzer. The question is, how much are they willing to spend. I’m sure Rizzo will be playing all 3 against each other. Of those 3 teams, I say the Dodgers need him the least, but will they overpay to keep him from going to one of the other 2 teams.

    Reply
  63. Poster formerly known as . . .

    4 years ago

    Today is Max’s birthday, btw. I wonder if he’ll get a new team for a birthday present.

    1
    Reply
  64. dirkg

    4 years ago

    Mad Max and Ohtani at the top of the rotation with Trout and Rendon coming back. That would be quite a force. Of course you’ll also need some bullpen help because you can’t serve a New York steak and then offer gummie bears for dessert.

    1
    Reply
    • Ya'll a bunch of salty crybabies

      4 years ago

      As long as they are “special” gummies, then I’m in!

      2
      Reply
      • dirkg

        4 years ago

        Arthur, that can be arranged. Last night with Maddon using Quintana and his 7 ERA in the 8 inning, I needed to consume a case of “special” gummies to get through the game.

        I will offer Perry a truck load of special gummies and a box of electric Kit Kats if he can get some bullpen arms to help out this pitching staff.

        Reply
        • Ya'll a bunch of salty crybabies

          4 years ago

          Does Perry have cataracts? That’s the only reason that I eat them…..;)

          Reply
    • Poster formerly known as . . .

      4 years ago

      You might say the Halos owe it to the baseball world to give Trout a fighting chance at a postseason berth while he’s still in his prime. I dunno if ownership sees it that way though.

      Reply
  65. DarkSide830

    4 years ago

    ROFL

    2
    Reply
  66. Deleted_User

    4 years ago

    Always interests me when a team that is out of the race refuses to trade a rental to a division rival. The division rival has way more to lose than they do, as they only have to face their former player on a division rival for two months, in which they aren’t contending anyway.

    Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      4 years ago

      I agree this is weak as a explanation in general, but the difference in this case is Scherzer seemingly won’t waive his no-trade unless he gets an extension.

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        Can people please stop repeating that? Boras already backpedaled that statement. And the only reason Max Scherzer, a likely future Hall of Famer in the middle of a “business as usual” season who can be a free agent at the end of the season and will not be eligible for a qualifying offer would NEED an extension is if he knows he’s about to blow his arm out in the next 3 months.

        Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          Not really, if you read what he said. As usual he’s trying to play both sides of the street. We don’t need to be fooled by that. He made it clear he’ll be looking for something more for his client than a straight rental trade, or his name isn’t Scott Boras, and last I checked, it still was.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          He said they would be looking for “some kind of contractual inducement” and that “contractual inducement” doesn’t necessarily mean extension. And it was then later reported by Jesse Dougherty of the WaPo (and then repeated in the article we are commenting on) that Scherzer is “open to being traded and would not invoke his 10-and-5 rights for the sole purpose of remaining with the Nationals. However, Scherzer could use that full no-trade protection as a way to have a say in his ultimate destination if the Nats are presented with offers from multiple clubs.” So it, unexpectedly, sounds like getting traded to a contender in a city he likes would be more than enough of an “inducement.”

          And like I said, Scherzer doesn’t need an extension. Teams will be lining up to sign him this winter. And Boras even said later on that he’d rather negotiate on the open market than only be allowed to negotiate with one team.

          Reply
        • Chief Two Hands

          4 years ago

          A desire to choose the team he may be traded to was unexpected to you?

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @Chief Two Hands No! But he doesn’t have to get an extension to do that.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          Trying to think of another “contractual inducement” that makes sense for Scherzer other than an extension, and all I can come up with is a pony. Max really wants a pony. As for an extension, it isn’t a matter of need, it’s a matter of want. It would go well with the pony.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Like I said. Getting to play for an actual contender should be more than enough of an “inducement.” Max already isn’t a Nats lifer so accepting a trade won’t ruin his legacy or whatever.

          And Jesse Dougherty already said that Max would just use the NTC to dictate which team he goes to rather than just blocking trades altogether.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          Because otherwise he’s liable to be traded to a non-contender?

          If it isn’t an extension or a player option, I’m still going with the pony until I hear some better ideas.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BlueSkies_LA dude he has a full NTC. He can already block a trade to a non-contender. No extension needed.

          Reply
  67. AshamedMethGoat

    4 years ago

    MetsFan22 gonna cry.

    Reply
    • Ya'll a bunch of salty crybabies

      4 years ago

      Nah! She’ll say that she never wanted him in the first place. Happens every time.

      Reply
  68. Dogs

    4 years ago

    I will make a Bold Prediction, Scherzer will play for Philadelphia in a few days & they will overtake the Mets for the Division Championship.

    Reply
  69. Deleted Userrr

    4 years ago

    Ran into Max Scherzer at a grocery store in Capitol Hill last week. I told him how cool it was to meet him in person, but I didn’t want to bother him and ask him about the trade rumors. He said, “Oh, like you’re doing now?” I was taken aback, and all I could say was “Huh?” but he kept cutting me off and going “huh? huh? huh?” and closing his hand shut in front of my face. I walked away and continued with my shopping, and I heard him chuckle as I walked off. When I came to pay for my stuff up front I saw him trying to walk out the doors with like fifteen Milky Ways in his hands without paying. The girl at the counter was very nice about it and professional, and was like “Sir, you need to pay for those first.” At first he kept pretending to be tired and not hear her, but eventually turned back around and brought them to the counter. When she took one of the Milky Ways and started scanning it multiple times, he stopped her and told her to scan them each individually “to prevent any electrical infetterence,” and then turned around and winked at me. I don’t even think that’s a word. After she scanned each bar and put them in a bag and started to say the price, he kept interrupting her by yawning really loudly.

    2
    Reply
    • Ya'll a bunch of salty crybabies

      4 years ago

      Have you been smoking the devil’s lettuce, Jim?

      2
      Reply
      • Slothcliff Hokum

        4 years ago

        Great stuff, Jim! Sounds like the time I ran into Jimi Hendrix last summer at a Safeway in Seattle.

        Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 years ago

          Was Hendrix into Milky Way or Three Musketeers?

          Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      4 years ago

      Jim you win the internet for today.

      Reply
  70. Shrutefarm

    4 years ago

    Trea Turner was just removed from the game.

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Covid

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Joc Pederson Suffers Right Hand Fracture

    Recent

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    Brewers Claim Drew Avans

    White Sox Sign Tyler Alexander, Place Jared Shuster On 15-Day IL

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    Diamondbacks Select Kyle Backhus, Designate Aramis Garcia

    Athletics Acquire Austin Wynns

    Julio Rodriguez Helped Off Field Following Apparent Injury

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version