Headlines

  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Yankees, Astros, Mariners Have Spoken To Cubs About Cody Bellinger

By Steve Adams | December 5, 2024 at 3:38pm CDT

Cody Bellinger has stood as one of the most recognizable but difficult-to-move names on the offseason trade market. Among the teams to reach out recently are the Yankees, Astros and Mariners, reports Bruce Levine of 670 The Score. However, Levine adds that the Cubs aren’t looking to merely shed Bellinger’s salary, nor do they want to cover much (if any) money in a deal. That’s likely to be an issue. ESPN’s Buster Olney wrote this morning that other teams feel the Cubs will need to pay down a notable portion of Bellinger’s salary (or, presumably, take back another contract) if they intend to get much in the way of a return.

The Cubs have been looking to upgrade various spots on the roster but have a tough road to do so, in part due to no-trade clauses for Dansby Swanson, Ian Happ and Seiya Suzuki. Other positions, like first base (Michael Busch) and center field (Pete Crow-Armstrong) are already manned by promising young players. Third baseman Isaac Paredes was only just acquired at the deadline. Second baseman Nico Hoerner makes some sense as an option to free up some cash and a spot in the lineup for a more impactful bat, but he’s coming off flexor surgery.

That’s led the Cubs to at least gauge interest in Bellinger, who passed on the opportunity to opt out of the remaining two years and $52.5MM on his contract at the beginning of the offseason. Bellinger had a fine year overall, hitting .266/.325/.426 with 18 homers and a tiny 15.6% strikeout rate (his second straight season with that exact strikeout rate). But while those numbers were solid, they pale in comparison to his 2023 showing. He also posted lesser defensive grades both in the outfield and at first bae in 2024.

[Related: Looking for a Match in a Cody Bellinger Trade]

The Yankees have been laying some groundwork in the event that Juan Soto ultimately signs elsewhere, showing recent interest in top-tier free agents like Corbin Burnes, Max Fried and Willy Adames. That said, there’d pretty clearly be room for both Bellinger and Soto on the same roster. Bellinger could slot in at first base in the Bronx, offering another left-handed bat with good contact skills — a contrast to some of the strikeout-prone righties elsewhere in the lineup. He’d also be good insurance in the outfield, given the injury histories of both Aaron Judge and top prospect Jasson Dominguez. Bellinger could also serve as a safety net in the event that Dominguez looks overmatched early on.

In Houston, the Astros have a clear need at first base after their three-year, $58.5MM deal with Jose Abreu went sideways almost immediately. After a poor first year in 2023, Abreu started the 2024 season so poorly that he consented to being optioned to the minors. That Triple-A stint didn’t help, and Abreu was released less than halfway through that three-year deal. The ’Stros subsequently gave most of the playing time at first base to Jon Singleton, who provided light offense and subpar defense the rest of the way.

For the Mariners, first base has emerged as a clear need. They have at least one intriguing in-house option in prospect Tyler Locklear, but the M’s have been linked heavily to veterans Carlos Santana and Justin Turner as they search for a veteran bat at first base (and likely another at the hot corner). Bellinger’s contact skills would help Seattle cut down on the team’s longstanding strikeout issues as well.

The bigger issue with regard to Bellinger isn’t so much his overall ability, but rather the magnitude of his contract. He’s owed $52.5MM over the next two season — a guarantee that’s paid out in heavily frontloaded fashion. He’s taking home a $27.5MM salary in 2025 and is owed a $5MM buyout on a $25MM player option for the 2026 season if he opts out of the contract’s final season next winter. For an acquiring team, Bellinger would add $26.25MM to the luxury tax ledger and would cost at least $32.5MM in terms of actual, present-day salary.

For the 2023 version of Bellinger — .307/.356/.525 (136 wRC+), 26 home runs — teams would happily pay that price. Of course, if Bellinger had produced at that same level in 2024, he’d surely have taken the first opt-out opportunity in his contract at the beginning of this offseason. That he chose to forgo his opt-out clause is indicative of the fact that he and agent Scott Boras don’t believe there’s a sizable nine-figure contract waiting for him.

With regard to the Yankees, that luxury number could be problematic. Whether they sign Soto or pursue multiple free agents from the Fried/Burnes/Adames bucket after missing out on him, they’ll surely be a luxury tax payor in at least the third tier of penalty — if not the fourth. Since they’re looking at paying the tax in three straight seasons, that means they’ll either be staring down a 95% tax or 110% tax rate. Bellinger would cost them somewhere between $52-56MM in combined salary and taxes — plus that potential $5MM buyout on the 2026 option. Even for a deep-pocketed club like the Yankees, that’s a staggering price to pay, particularly coming off a good-not-great season for Bellinger.

The Astros, too, have some luxury concerns. RosterResource estimates that they’re just about $7MM shy of the first-tier threshold. They’ve looked into trading Ryan Pressly, but even if Houston were able to unload his full $14MM salary, Bellinger would still thrust them back into luxury territory. The 2024 season was the first in which owner Jim Crane authorized paying the tax. Adding Bellinger would very likely require doing so a second time. Speculatively speaking, a swap of Pressly and Bellinger could make sense for both parties involved, though Pressly can veto any potential deal as a player with 10-and-5 rights.

Luxury considerations don’t apply to the Mariners, but the actual bottom-line cash owed to Bellinger will be an obstacle. Seattle is looking to add two infielders — one at each corner — and ownership doesn’t seem to have an appetite for raising payroll too far beyond last year’s roughly $145MM level. The Mariners already project for a number in a similar range. If they could find a taker for one Mitch Haniger or Mitch Garver, perhaps Bellinger would become more realistic. For now, it seems likely that ever-active president of baseball operations Jerry Dipoto is simply doing due diligence, perhaps hoping the Cubs will pay down some of the contract (if not take someone like Garver back as part of the return).

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Chicago Cubs Houston Astros New York Yankees Seattle Mariners Cody Bellinger

Astros Interested In Christian Walker
Main
Tigers Re-Sign Wilmer Flores, Eddys Leonard To Minor League Deals
View Comments (155)
Post a Comment

155 Comments

  1. jeff51488

    6 months ago

    Wow

    Reply
    • Big whiffa

      6 months ago

      Yankees linked to every big name bc they kno Soto ain’t coming back

      1
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        6 months ago

        Is Soto the only position they need to address? Until Soto says “yes” then you go any your due diligence at all positions of need. They might be considering Bellinger to play 1b.

        3
        Reply
        • Pete'sView

          6 months ago

          And I think it’s the Yanks where Bellinger will end up.

          Reply
    • LaFleur

      6 months ago

      Wow is right… he’s a .260-.280 hitter with MVP upside and is owned 25 millions to give you league to above league average Wrc and the cubbies acting like people gonna take on his money and give them top prospects

      Reply
  2. ortsacnilrats

    6 months ago

    If someone offers to take him and pay him in full the Cubs should do it for nothing else in return. Then go after Burnes.

    1
    Reply
    • Blackpink in the area

      6 months ago

      I wouldn’t count on that happening.

      6
      Reply
    • Led Hoyer

      6 months ago

      The cubs refuse to spend at the top of the market. I just don’t see a path where they trade bellinger and somehow get better. It makes no sense. It sounds like shed the contract and hope Owen Caissie out produces bellinger. Maybe get a bullpen arm for him. Hoyer put himself in this conundrum building an 83 win team with no open spots. The only two viable trade options are also some of their best all around players.

      2
      Reply
      • Blackpink in the area

        6 months ago

        Yeah I agree Led it doesn’t add up. It seems like they want to move Bellinger to fill their other needs but they don’t have many other needs.

        This site was saying the Cubs were gonna spend 60 million this offseason. Does anyone still think that happens? Sure doesn’t seem like it to me.

        Reply
        • pt57

          6 months ago

          Cubs need another starter and a closer.

          1
          Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          6 months ago

          The Cubs don’t need another starter. Definitely need pen help.

          1
          Reply
        • pt57

          6 months ago

          Yeah, they do. A top if the rotation type of arm.

          I don’t think they should count on Imanaga and Tallion repeating last year. Wrigley played like a pitcher’s park last year. Rotation would be a whole better if everyone were pushed down a slot. Assad might be better off in bp, he doesn’t go 5 often enough.

          But that’s probably not going to happen. Cubs are good at pretending to be competitive.

          1
          Reply
      • pt57

        6 months ago

        Yeah, I hope it’s just to clear a spot for Caissie.

        Reply
        • Unclemike1526

          6 months ago

          Well the Cubs had 70 million to spend WITH Bellinger. They’ve spent 15 million on Boyd. So that leaves 55 million to spend up to the tax. I hope Hoyer is smart enough to keep 10 million in reserve for the deadline but well it’s Hoyer. If they can move Bellinger it opens more possibilities but then you have to bring in another bat. This ought to be an interesting Winter Meetings to be sure. Which way do they go? Trade prospects for a young stud P? Trade Belli and play at the top? Can’t wait to see what they do.

          Reply
  3. twozero6ix

    6 months ago

    Sounds like Hoerner is going to Seattle in the next week or so, Belli for Garver I guess? Dipoto will trade the soles off his shoes if he can

    Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      6 months ago

      Belly is worth a lot more than garver

      Also idk if we are going to get either in a trade

      7
      Reply
      • mynameisjeff253

        6 months ago

        Belli is a negative asset right now. Perhaps moreso than Garver. Think about the dollars and years. Garver’s contract ends this season at like $12M where Belli is $27M this year and $25M next or $5M buyout. I’d rather have Garver than Belli at their current values. Garver is at least a serviceable backup catcher. Haniger on the other hand….no value whatsoever.

        2
        Reply
        • Cmurphy

          6 months ago

          Garver was horrible with Seattle last year. So many first pitch outs. I think he even hit into a first pitch DP after the pitcher loaded the bases with walks.

          1
          Reply
        • Led Hoyer

          6 months ago

          Garver was really bad last year. Below replacement level. From a production standpoint every penny he was paid was an overpay. Bellinger has put up 4.5 and 2.5 War the last two years. Banking on a 3+ WAR in 2025 probably isn’t a bad bet. He’s a good player, i really hope they don’t trade him for a worthless asset. Tack on prospects, pay it down, or better yet just keep him. 2024 Wrigley was a pitchers paradise.

          Reply
      • Blackpink in the area

        6 months ago

        Bellinger for Garver is reasonable.

        2
        Reply
        • pt57

          6 months ago

          No, no it’s not.

          7
          Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          6 months ago

          Yes. Yes it is.

          Bellinger has a bad contract. So does Garver. At least with Garver you can walk away from it after 2025. Bellinger will probably opt in to his deal for 2026.

          1
          Reply
        • Pete'sView

          6 months ago

          Nope. Despite his poor contract, Bellinger is still useful. In what world do the Cubs need Garver even if considering saving some money?

          1
          Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          6 months ago

          Bellinger is owed a probable 52.5 million over the next 2 years. Garver is owed 13.5 million. That’s a gigantic amount of savings for the Cubs. And Garver is a catcher the Cubs could use catching help. They really gonna roll with Amaya and Thaiss?

          Reply
        • pt57

          6 months ago

          Bellinger likely won’t opt in next year. It’s a $20 million decision for him. He’ll easily beat that unless he gets hurt or is really terrible.

          Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          6 months ago

          If he has another season like he did in 2024 he’s not easily beating that.

          Reply
        • Dogbone

          6 months ago

          Exactly – and that’s why the contract isn’t bad, for the Cubs. They should keep him around one more year.

          1
          Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          6 months ago

          And if he does leave the Cubs or whoever team he is on at the time has to pay him 5 million to play somewhere else.

          Like I said Garver is only owed 13.5 million.

          Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      6 months ago

      The M’s aren’t taking on Bellinger’s contract.

      3
      Reply
      • Captainmike1

        6 months ago

        No intelligent GM would take him at full salary

        2
        Reply
        • Bookbook

          6 months ago

          Nor would the M’s.

          2
          Reply
      • Mets Era Thumping Soto

        6 months ago

        They wouldn’t have called if they weren’t thinking about it.

        Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          6 months ago

          metsin4, Not necessarily. Maybe they called hoping the Cubs would eat a decent sized portion of the money. Depending on the answer, any interest may have waned quickly.

          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          6 months ago

          There article says they expect to eat some salary.

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          6 months ago

          No it doesn’t. In the first paragraph it says, and I quote:

          “…the Cubs aren’t looking to merely shed Bellinger’s salary, nor do they want to cover much (if any) money in a deal.”

          1
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          6 months ago

          And then goes on to say
          That’s likely to be an issue. ESPN’s Buster Olney wrote this morning that other teams feel the Cubs will need to pay down a notable portion of Bellinger’s salary (or, presumably, take back another contract) if they intend to get much in the way of a return

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          6 months ago

          You’re missing the point. It doesn’t matter that other clubs think they need to eat salary. Right now the Cubs are saying they aren’t. So, it’s very clear that the article did not say the Cubs expected to eat some salary.

          And if they’re saying that now, then they probably said that to the M’s. And since the M’s aren’t taking on Bellinger’s salary, any interest they had is probably diminished.

          Reply
      • slund24

        6 months ago

        Maybe they would take on Bellingers contract if they can ship Cubs Garver and Haniger.. But not sure they’d even do that because its still taking on an extra year of a bad contract.

        Reply
        • Dogbone

          6 months ago

          IMO, I see no reason for the Cubs to trade Belli before the season – unless a team knocks their socks off with an offer. Bellinger helps the Cubs this season In many ways. His contract is NOT hampering the Cubs from making any additional moves that they currently don’t have the room to pursue.
          Bellinger is likely to deliver numbers between those of the last two years.
          His quality defense and position flexibility mean so much.
          Bellingers value isn’t likely to decline.

          1
          Reply
    • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

      6 months ago

      Why do you say that? Jerry maneuvers very effectively given the financial constraints imposed upon him.

      2
      Reply
    • BillR47

      6 months ago

      If both Bellinger and Hoerner were going to Seattle I would wager that Luis Castillo and the 2ys/50M owed to him would go back to Chicago. Thats the only way the trade is “revenue neutral” enough for the Mariners to take on both of their contracts. Perhaps the Ms would need to include a decent prospect or high-leverage reliever (Gregory Santos?) to balance things out. Does Chicago want/need a good starter who chews up innings?

      2
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        6 months ago

        We wouldn’t sell Santos at his low point

        Or would we?

        Reply
  4. Blackpink in the area

    6 months ago

    Cubs must be hurting for money. Why else trade Bellinger?

    1
    Reply
    • Seven_Costanza

      6 months ago

      They’re one of the most popular teams in the sport, I doubt it. Just have a cheap owner. They should be trying to sign Soto not trying to shed salary

      4
      Reply
      • Blackpink in the area

        6 months ago

        My point is clear. There is no reason to trade Bellinger unless they are trying to save money.

        Reply
        • pt57

          6 months ago

          To open up a spot for their minor league depth.

          If Suzuki can hack it in RF, the Cubs could use DH to give their minor leaguers ABs.

          1
          Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          6 months ago

          A win now team is going to trade away a good player because they have minor league depth?

          This is a cost cutting move if they trade him.

          2
          Reply
        • Seven_Costanza

          6 months ago

          It’s definitely a cost cutting move but because their owner wants to increase profit not because they are hurting for money. I think we were always on the same page lol

          1
          Reply
      • Unclemike1526

        6 months ago

        Ricketts is a cheap owner? I still love morons who say that. He’s spent about a billion dollars to improve the Ballpark, Neighborhood and Farm system to be one of the best in baseball. So now he expects to make a profit? The nerve of that guy! People are morons.

        Reply
    • Big whiffa

      6 months ago

      Don’t believe everything reported by the media lol. Just bc they are listening to offers doesn’t mean they have any desire to trade him. Cubs lineup is deep but average which means bellinger is even more valuable in that lineup. Also, it’s a one year deal at 32.5 mil which is a really bad contract. Bellinger has to completely tank next season not to opt out at season end. I’d say the odds of him being traded are close to 0

      1
      Reply
      • PutPeteinthehall

        6 months ago

        More like 27.5 m. If he opts out rather than returns in 2026 he forfeits the buy out. No reason to move him during the off-season. Play half the season. If he’s raking and the team is below .500 can be moved then. The team needs impact bats. He’s one if healthy. Played hurt last season and had big time shoulder issues his last few seasons in LA. Cubs need a bullpen and a slugging second or third baseman. I doubt Paredes game plays in Chicago. Cubs need a real impact bat.

        2
        Reply
        • Big whiffa

          6 months ago

          If he opts out he does not get the buyout ? That would make it a buyin then I think hmmm….makes sense I guess but are you sure you are right ?

          Reply
        • BBB

          6 months ago

          Like the story says, “he is owed a $5MM buyout on a $25MM player option for the 2026 season if he opts out of the contract’s final season next winter.” He either takes the $25 million, or opts out and walks away with $5 million in his pocket.

          Reply
        • Big whiffa

          6 months ago

          Right. But that’s not what Pete said.

          He’s 100% opting out. Bc he’s going to get more than net 20 mil as a free agent next offseason. So he’s gonna take the 5 mil and bail. Thats an absolute 100% lock.

          So 1 year at 32.5 mil

          Reply
        • Big whiffa

          6 months ago

          And him making 27.5 is not a bad contract. It’s having to pay him 5 mil when it’s certain that he will be a free agent after that is what makes it terrible contract

          Reply
  5. Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

    6 months ago

    Given that the Cubs would have been happy if he had opted out, it stands to reason that they’d give him away for a bucket of chicken if somebody took the entire contract. So then the question becomes what prospect or catcher the Cubs can buy for $10M, $15M (10 plus the 5 in the option) or $10M plus $10M if he opts in for 2026?

    1
    Reply
  6. Wagner>Cobb

    6 months ago

    A great fit for the Yankees imho. His bat plays well there, plus he upgrades the defense and base running so much.

    7
    Reply
    • Captainmike1

      6 months ago

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!

      Reply
  7. TheYankeesFan99

    6 months ago

    Who Would the Yankees Offer for him though?

    1
    Reply
    • itsmeheyhii

      6 months ago

      Its hard to tell without knowing how much $ the Cubs would actually be willing to eat. It wouldnt take a ton if the Yanks took on the whole contract.

      Reply
      • rocky7

        6 months ago

        The more the Cubs are willing to take on the better the return ask from the Yankees, and of course the opposite…if the Cubs are unwilling to take on significant money, they probably would get a very low minor league player in return……

        1
        Reply
    • Captainmike1

      6 months ago

      5 hot dogs
      No more
      And cubs pay half his salary

      Reply
    • larkraxm

      6 months ago

      The obvious answer is cash, but the Yankees, and every other team in MLB, have 10 to 15 prospects that every team would be interested in. I remember last off season when the Yankees traded 5 pitchers for Juan Soto that was supposed to “deplete the farm system”. Then they called up a kid named Luis Gil that just went out and became the AL rookie of the year.

      1
      Reply
    • Joe says...

      6 months ago

      Could always send Stro back to the Cubs.

      2
      Reply
    • themightygin

      6 months ago

      Cubs would probably take Trevino. That’s a start. Don’t think the Cubs want Stro back but I’d think they could find a 3rd team that needs pitching to send a middling prospect to the Cubs and take Stroman. Reds? Giants? Yanks still take on salary but at a palatable cost for 1b/CF with upside in the bat.

      Reply
      • Joe says...

        6 months ago

        I was joking about Stro. I can’t blame anyone for not wanting him.

        2
        Reply
  8. User 1939973770

    6 months ago

    The Astros need to just own their mistakes of signing Abreu/Montero/LMJ to bad contracts and pay the luxury tax penalties for any overages.

    OR

    They could rebuild by offloading Pressly/Valdez/Tucker, but I doubt anyone else being paid $$$$ has any value.

    Reply
  9. Yankee Clipper

    6 months ago

    Yankees paid the same for a much, much less well-performing Josh Donaldson.

    2
    Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      6 months ago

      True, but that’s not a good reason to take on an overpaid Bellinger. I like the Yankees as the best fit, but if the Cubs aren’t eating much, if any, of the money. the fit is less than ideal.

      1
      Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      6 months ago

      Makes sense Cubs stand there ground dealing with $man

      1
      Reply
  10. Stevil

    6 months ago

    Third base is a clear need for Seattle. Second base is a clear need for Seattle. DH is a clear need for Seattle.

    First base is most likely going to be covered by Luke Raley vs. RHPs.

    Seattle is going to do their due diligence on anyone who could potentially help them unload Haniger and/or Garver.

    6
    Reply
    • Stevil

      6 months ago

      If anyone’s curious what Luke Raley did in 2024: .243/.320/.463; 129 wRC+; 2.3 fWAR.. He had a 181 wRC+ the last two months of the season and cut down on the strike outs a bit as well (26.8 K%).

      And he’s pre-arb.. Given his ability to play the OF and 1B, it would be odd to see him used as the DH. It would be even odder to see him as the fourth outfielder without a clear path to PAs.

      2
      Reply
      • bloomquist4hof

        6 months ago

        I think Raley ends up being part of the First Base solution, it would be a waste not to unless they planned on trading him. Raley’s glove isn’t quite DH worthy yet and the Mariners seem to like him. Getting help at DH and either a full time 3B or 2B (or both) makes way more sense unless it’s a significant upgrade. My guess is fans won’t be happy with what they end up doing.

        1
        Reply
        • Stevil

          6 months ago

          If they’re truly bent on bringing back Turner or Santana, it will be important to have a regular third and second baseman, so they don’t end up having a weak option DHing vs. LHPs.

          I’d add that Raley was kind of thrown into first base duties late. With an offseason to prepare, and spring with Perry Hill, I’m not worried about his glove. And if he produces like he did last season, there’s even less reason to worry about his glove.

          Reply
    • hllywdjff

      6 months ago

      So we get Hoerner Parades from the Cubs and Santana to platoon with Raley..Julio loves Santana. There’s our infield…We can go over budget 8 to 10 million dollars. It’s not gonna kill the mariners, for God’s sakes. They’ll make up that money in the first three months of the year with a attendance increase if they’re decent.

      Reply
      • Stevil

        6 months ago

        I don’t know where the Parades name-dropping is coming from, but they just acquired him at the deadline. I don’t know why Chicago would move him.

        His hitting profile doesn’t look like a great fit for T-Mobile, either, and I would imagine Seattle could have out-bid the Cubs and acquired him at the deadline themselves if they had been truly interested. That’s speculation on my part, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Seattle isn’t high on him.

        1
        Reply
        • hllywdjff

          6 months ago

          The Cubs have some young infielders ready to come up I read an article from one of the espn guys that Parades could be available for the right price..Could be lol

          Reply
        • Stevil

          6 months ago

          Chicago has a handful of prospects on the cusp of their MLB debuts. Shaw is the most promising, in my opinion.

          But this is a team that should be pushing in the chips to really contend. It’s hard to believe they’d rely on multiple rookies to reach the postseason.

          They’re probably going to move someone, but more than one? I have doubts.

          Reply
  11. Salzilla

    6 months ago

    Yanks are not laying the ground work in case they don’t land Soto. They are doing so because they have multiple areas of need regardless if they land the big fish or not. Bellinger plays 1b and OF, that flexibility would honestly really be of value.

    3
    Reply
    • Captainmike1

      6 months ago

      I might leave the country if the yanks get Cody
      But they have made many stupid trades so it should not be a complete surprise

      Reply
  12. hllywdjff

    6 months ago

    The mariners are just putting this story out there that they’re interested. And then they’ll come out and say well we just couldn’t get a deal done when they had no intention of making a deal at all….Typical dipoto move

    5
    Reply
  13. TheGr8One

    6 months ago

    Doubt Seattle lands him if Chicago is moving him it’s to dump salary and Seattle won’t take him without sending a bad contract back (Garver springs to mind). Bellinger would work here but he’s not a need we send pitching or prospects for.

    3
    Reply
  14. DarrenDreifortsContract

    6 months ago

    Hopefully those teams don’t make the postseason.

    Reply
  15. hllywdjff

    6 months ago

    Get Hoerner and Parades for Woo and Hancock… That will solve your infield problem

    Reply
    • Zippy the Pinhead

      6 months ago

      Not trading Woo.

      1
      Reply
      • hllywdjff

        6 months ago

        Have to give up an asset to get bats…Woo is very fragile sell high on him he will be hurt within a few years….

        Reply
        • TheGr8One

          6 months ago

          Take Garvers contract and send Seattle a pitching prospect and I make that deal. Seattle will struggle to get bats through FA forcing them to come may be the only way. Going to have to trade to get. Hancock is unproven with upside but Seattle needs today-side not upside.

          Reply
        • Stevil

          6 months ago

          They have six legitimate starters and those six represented all but 1 start last season.

          They can’t trade a single starter, yet alone two, without bringing another one in.

          I think Seattle is more likely to add starting pitching they can stash in Tacoma than they are to trade one of them.

          And they’d likely be selling low on Woo. His ceiling is high. Teams would use his health questions as leverage. There’s too much pitching available this offseason for me to believe a team would pay (high) for Woo’s potential.

          Maybe things change at the deadline.

          Reply
        • hllywdjff

          6 months ago

          One bargaining chip the Mariners have is Woo and Miller are so inexpensive and you see what these free agent starting pitchers are getting…. Boyd getting fourteen million dollars a year.?? Wow… So I would think teams would be salivating to get a pitcher like that for a million dollars a year.

          Reply
        • Stevil

          6 months ago

          I think you might be looking at this backwards…

          Teams would rather buy starting pitching than trade for it. That’s probably why we’re seeing decent deals for starters early.. Teams don’t want to sacrifice good hitters or elite prospects.

          Reply
        • hllywdjff

          6 months ago

          So maybe the draft develop and trade philosophy of the Mariners is backwards in this day and age of baseball???? Just spend baby!

          Reply
        • hllywdjff

          6 months ago

          Developing inexpensive pitching and buying cheap hitting doesn’t work because the pitching is too good in MLB
          And if you don’t have good hitters to offset it then you’re going to have a terrible offense like we do and you cant win many games 1-0..

          Reply
        • Stevil

          6 months ago

          Well, the problem for Seattle is that they haven’t developed much hitting. Julio is a generational talent and the only other hitter they’ve developed so far is Cal.

          But they have been trading. They acquired Raley and Arozarena via trade. They just need a lot more. If they aren’t going to spend on FA bats,

          Reply
        • hllywdjff

          6 months ago

          They can’t make every trade with tampa bay lol

          Reply
  16. Captainmike1

    6 months ago

    As a yankee fan I say

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  17. holycow16

    6 months ago

    Fine… we’ll trade Judge for Bellinger.

    We can make it work.

    Reply
  18. Jean Matrac

    6 months ago

    “…the Cubs aren’t looking to merely shed Bellinger’s salary, nor do they want to cover much (if any) money…”

    If that’s not just posturing, Bellinger is a Cub in 2025.

    Reply
  19. Captainmike1

    6 months ago

    I thought it was a stupid signing by the cubs and I have been proven right as usual

    1
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      6 months ago

      Impressive. Where can we see this prediction at?

      Reply
      • batteryoutlet

        6 months ago

        it wasnt a stupid signing either, even if he predict it

        Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          6 months ago

          It was a awful contract. I find paying more than something is worth stupid.

          Reply
        • batteryoutlet

          6 months ago

          you have no idea how markets work then

          Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      6 months ago

      I was happy that the Cubs signed Bellinger. That’s because he was rumored to be signed by the team I root for. I breathed a sigh of relief.

      2
      Reply
  20. DanielDannyDano

    6 months ago

    Bellinger will be a Toronto BlueJay. Atkins/Shapiro will be scrambling to spend Rogers’ money after they lose out on Juan Soto, hoping to strike gold in 2025while failing to re-sign Vladdy and Bo.

    Reply
  21. Astros_fan_in_Aus

    6 months ago

    Cubs trade Bellinger and pay $3M of his salary for the next two years. Astros trade Pressley who will cost them $14.5M for one year.
    Cubs are $9M better off, and Astros increase their payroll by $9M.
    Sounds fair to me.

    1
    Reply
  22. texasbug

    6 months ago

    I am still praying that the Houston Astros get this player and he can help them back to the 2025 World Series.

    1
    Reply
  23. KnicksFanCavsFan

    6 months ago

    Regardless of whether they resign Soto, they must address 1b, and whether it’s signing Walker, Santana, etc, they all cost extra in lux tax. Bellinger is at $27 per. Walker will likely be around the same but for at least 3 years. Maybe Santana can be had for around 1/ $20? Otherwise, you give Rice a shot at the job in ST with DJ as the fallback. I love what I see in Rice. It’s just a matter of what the Yanks think, and are they OK with breaking in two (Dominguez and Rice) or three rookies this year (Durbin had been mentioned as an option at 2b). I like all 3 rookies, but that’s a lot leaning on 5 young hitters in the lineup ( the other two being Wells and Volpe).

    There’s a lot of options avail in FA or trade.

    Reply
    • dasit

      6 months ago

      even with judge and soto doing MVP things a line-up including rice, wells, jasson, volpe and one of djlm/cabrera/peraza/durbin is a disaster waiting to happen. imo yankees need to sign both soto and adames and pray that jasson and rice take huge steps forward

      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        6 months ago

        @dasit

        Well I don’t know if I’d call it a disaster but it may require the Yanks to go thru growing pains. Effectively what’s the plus/ minus of

        replacing Torres, Verdugo and Rizzo for Rice, Durbin, Dominguez? Or lineup finished top 3 in almost every category except SB. But that’s without a full season of Jazz.

        Reply
  24. Well Hung

    6 months ago

    Bellinger for Strowman and Trevino?

    Reply
  25. Seaver rules

    6 months ago

    If the Mets can’t land Soto, I can see Stearns calling the Cubbies and make something happen.

    1
    Reply
  26. aspenner27

    6 months ago

    Look, I don’t want him either but with fWAR roughly $11mil/1 fWAR his contract isn’t that crazy.

    Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      6 months ago

      Bellinger should have been a Yankees a few years ago instead of bringing back Rizzo. Would have cost money instead of prospects. I’m tired of seeing Yankees in false rumors. However let’s make a deal Pereira, Pereza and Trevino for Bellinger

      Reply
  27. batteryoutlet

    6 months ago

    trade nico and belli + prospect, get a top arm back, use the money for bullpen help, bring up the prospects and see what you got. the cubs had 26 blown saves last year, if they cut that number in half they have a playoff contending team

    Reply
  28. Goose

    6 months ago

    The Yankees need to get back to the 90’s mold. I wouldn’t sign Soto. I would go get Bellinger. In that lineup and park his bat is plus and he gives you a solid CF. Resign Torres to play 2B. Go sign or acquire a RH OF that is solid on defense. Sign Burnes or Fried for the rotation. Go get a defense orientated catcher. Go sign Bergman for 3B.

    The problem with the current Yankees is they are like the 1980’s team. A handful of studs with a bunch of overpaid drop offs.

    Reply
  29. Big whiffa

    6 months ago

    It’s not his salary but the opt out that makes bellinger a hard stay away. There’s no way he doesn’t opt out at seasons end as he will get paid 5 mil to do so. And he’s going to bet on himself to perform so it’s unlikely he will consider an extension

    So why acquire him for 1 season at 32.5 mil ?

    Reply
    • batteryoutlet

      6 months ago

      its not a hard stay away (three teams are asking about him) its just a negotiating piece, cubs will probably have to give up more if they want to eat less salary or get a legit piece back. big market teams arent splitting hairs over 30 mil for a position player they determine they can definitely use for the season. Who else is signing a 1-2 year deal at his caliber in FA?

      Reply
      • Big whiffa

        6 months ago

        I agree teams should be interested, but what motive do cubs have to trade him due to his negative trade value and need for his bat ?

        Reply
        • batteryoutlet

          6 months ago

          The ‘negative value’ piece is overblown on these comments a bit – i dont think there’s a substantial factor in real life negotiations. Sure, he had a down year and will opt out if he does well this year. But at the time it was a great signing – the market changes and its the reason pitching is getting over paid this off season. but to your point, i dont see the cubs ACTUALLY doing this, jed isnt that smart. but there is talk and rumors – he’d look fine in a cubs uniform next year.

          1
          Reply
        • Big whiffa

          6 months ago

          1 season at 32.5 mil is negative value. He’s not passing on a 5 mil buyout to make 21 mil in 2026

          Cubs will need to replace his bat in the lineup too. Tall order !

          1
          Reply
        • batteryoutlet

          6 months ago

          the negative value only means the trade will look different at the end of the day

          Reply
  30. Larry D.

    6 months ago

    If I’m a potential trade partner, no way am I taking on his entire salary. The Cubs want to ditch that money in the worst way and getting another team to pay for some of it, is better than getting stuck with all of it. Personally, I want him in the Cub lineup in 2025.

    Reply
    • KnicksFanCavsFan

      6 months ago

      I think you guys are way overacting. Belli is still a good glove with a good bat. He’s only 29 and 1 year removed from an all- star caliber player. It’s only 1/$32.5 at worst for a non taxpayer.

      1
      Reply
      • Larry D.

        6 months ago

        Yeah, I agree. The Cubs are a better ball club with him. The real issue is the Cubs unwillingness to “up the ante” in free agency.

        Reply
  31. Mikenmn

    6 months ago

    Cubs acting if they have a low priced, team controlled jewel. Cashman, don’t.

    Reply
  32. buffalobob88

    6 months ago

    Bellinger for Stanton

    Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      6 months ago

      @Buffalo. If only that were true. All I want for Christmas is Stanton and DJL off my team. I’d get rid of both for a bucket of balls. The open roster spots are more valuable

      1
      Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      6 months ago

      Stanton has a NTC, and would veto that in a NY second.

      Reply
    • KnicksFanCavsFan

      6 months ago

      @buff

      Performance wise Belli is better than Stanton, contract wise Stanton’s is far worse than Belli’s. Stanton has like 4 years left. Wouldn’t make sense on the Cubs side.

      Reply
  33. ❤️ MuteButton

    6 months ago

    Hopefully the Astros will take a hard pass

    Reply
  34. Ma4170

    6 months ago

    If the mets miss on Soto, i wonder if they would consider bellinger for baty. And would the cubs take a chance on a guy who was a top 20 mlb prospect in 2023? Prob no on both sides but im not sure cubs could expect much more if the other team takes on the whole salary.

    Reply
  35. UWPSUPERFAN77

    6 months ago

    One of the best Cubs! But anyone is tradable for the right price.!

    Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      6 months ago

      Bellinger gets traded to New York and Rizzo back to Chicago. That sounds like a great scenario.

      Reply
  36. SeanStL

    6 months ago

    He is the Cubs best chance at having a great bat in the lineup since they will not sign another long term contract, so he is a good fit. They will spend $200M this year so likely not still rebuilding. No good reason to get rid of him. If so, then they might as well trade give up on 2024 and signing Boyd shows they aren’t doing that.

    Reply
  37. Dumpster Divin Theo

    6 months ago

    Little interest in Mister Spicoli it would seem

    Reply
  38. MsFanWithPaperBag

    6 months ago

    Castillo, arozarano, hanger

    4

    Bellinger, hoerner, Suzuki

    Who says no?

    Reply
    • Dogbone

      6 months ago

      Anybody who follows baseball????

      Reply
  39. neurogame

    6 months ago

    Bellinger and extra money for Stroman?

    Reply
    • KnicksFanCavsFan

      6 months ago

      I think the Yanks works be too and a prospect or 2 for that to happen. no one likes Dominguez, Rice or Durbin but still a prospect ot 2. Belli is still a good performer.

      Reply
  40. KCMOWHOA

    6 months ago

    Royals take Bellinger for the full contract but Cubs take Hunter Renfroe in return?

    Reply
  41. unglar

    6 months ago

    Yanks gotta get Soto. Bellinger would be good in addition but less necessary if they have Soto.

    Reply
  42. thomasg1951

    6 months ago

    Cody will not be an Astro. Over his dead body because of the cheating.

    Reply
  43. Buff Barnacles

    6 months ago

    A classic father/son Yankee footnote. Who here is old enough to remember Cody’s Dad Clay Bellinger playing for the Yankee’s?

    Reply
  44. oneiblnd

    6 months ago

    Let’s see if Soto defers his payments. Doughtful.

    Reply
    • MLBTR needs to hire editors

      6 months ago

      For crying out loud, Adams. Your writing is terrible. This is wrong: “or, presumably, take back another contract.” You must put presumably at the end to avoid a dangling conjunction. Don’t bury the subject after multiple words, one of which doesn’t even belong.

      Then there’s this disaster: “The Astros, too, have some luxury concerns.” “Too” is not just a replacement for “also,” which is the word you should be using there. Otherwise, “too” ends the sentence. Write in proper English, please.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Joc Pederson Suffers Right Hand Fracture

    Recent

    Brewers Claim Drew Avans

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    White Sox Sign Tyler Alexander, Place Jared Shuster On 15-Day IL

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    Diamondbacks Select Kyle Backhus, Designate Aramis Garcia

    Athletics Acquire Austin Wynns

    Julio Rodriguez Helped Off Field Following Apparent Injury

    Astros Designate Forrest Whitley For Assignment

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Rays Promote Ian Seymour

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version