Headlines

  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Red Sox Interested In Alex Bregman On Shorter-Term Contracts

By Mark Polishuk | January 25, 2025 at 10:45am CDT

Alex Bregman and the Red Sox have been linked together for much of the offseason, and multiple reports have indicated that the Sox have indeed showed some level of interest in Bregman.  This interest is apparently in a somewhat limited capacity, however, as the Boston Globe’s Alex Speier, writes that the Sox have been focusing on shorter-term offers with Bregman, with an eye towards signing him to “a deal of no more than four years” in length.

While four years is a pretty big commitment in the broad sense, it is certainly below the expectations that Bregman and his camp set at the start of the offseason.  The Astros are known to have made Bregman a six-year, $156MM offer to stay in Houston, but Bregman was reportedly looking to hit the $200MM plateau in his next deal.  It remains to be seen if that asking price is still realistic, but as of last week, Bregman was still looking for longer-term offers rather than considering a pivot to a shorter-term pact with opt-outs included.

In the most recent Bregman developments, KPRC 2’s Ari Alexander reported yesterday that Bregman had received at least three offers of five or more years over the course of the offseason, though it isn’t known which teams made those offers or if they’re still on the table.  It would appear as though the Astros’ offer is still in play, as even though Houston signed Christian Walker and seemingly installed Isaac Paredes as their new third baseman, bringing back Bregman would see the Astros move Paredes to the keystone and longtime franchise icon Jose Altuve would move from second base to left field.

Against this backdrop, it would seem like the Red Sox are facing an uphill battle in convincing Bregman to sign for a maximum of four years.  It can probably be assumed that such a four-year deal carries a high average annual salary and an opt-out clause or two is attached, fitting the standard model of shorter-term contracts signed by other Scott Boras clients.  Such a deal would allow Bregman to re-enter free agency perhaps as early as next offseason, when he would aim to have another big platform season under his belt, and he would no longer be attached to a qualifying offer.

However, this scenario would see Bregman returning to the market in advance of his age-32 season, when teams might have even more misgivings about offering him a longer-term contract.  And, as Bregman approaches his 31st birthday in March, he must certainly feel like he has already done enough in his outstanding career to merit a long-term commitment.  Speculatively speaking, it could be that Bregman is facing a decision between accepting the Astros’ sixth guaranteed year (and the familiarity of staying with the organization), or perhaps taking a five-year deal that offers less long-term security but more money.

A traditional big spender in free agency, the Red Sox have largely shied away from major free agent commitments in recent years.  Trevor Story (six-years, $140MM) and Masataka Yoshida (five years, $90MM) are the only free agents to receive three or more guaranteed years from Sox since October 2019, and the lack of result on those contracts may have only further soured ownership on opening the checkbook for lengthy open-market deals.  Boston’s biggest contract of any kind since October 2019 was its ten-year, $313.5MM extension with Rafael Devers, which presents another obstacle in the way of a Bregman deal.  The Sox have reportedly given some thought to moving Devers off the hot corner and across the diamond to first base, but Devers’ agent pretty firmly shot down that possibility back in November.

Boras said at the start of November that Bregman was open to a position change himself, and a move to second base instead of his longtime third-base spot.  Such flexibility would’ve seemingly expanded the number of suitors that might be interested in Bregman, and it was specifically viewed as a possible nod to the chances of Bregman landing in Boston, if Devers was indeed staying put at third base (though Bregman is a much better fielder).  Of course, the issue regarding Bregman anywhere in Boston’s infield is the fact that the Red Sox have star infield prospects Kristian Campbell and Marcelo Mayer both knocking on the door of their big league debuts, so the Sox may not want to lock down second base for the forseeable future.

In a pure baseball sense, Bregman’s right-handed bat is an ideal fit for Boston’s lefty-tilted lineup, and a hitter of his caliber is an upgrade to virtually any team.  Bregman is also friendly with manager Alex Cora due to their past time together in Houston when Cora was the Astros’ bench coach, and past reports have indicated that Cora and Red Sox president Sam Kennedy are the chief drivers of Boston’s interest in Bregman, while chief baseball officer Craig Breslow perhaps isn’t quite as on board.  This split of opinion in management might perhaps explain why the Red Sox haven’t been as aggressive as others in courting Bregman, or offering him even a fifth guaranteed year.

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox Alex Bregman

Yordan Alvarez Discusses Late-Season Knee Injury, “Good To Go” For Spring Training
Main
Rockies Hire Charlie Blackmon For Special Assistant Role
View Comments (259)
Post a Comment

259 Comments

  1. FenwayFanatic

    4 months ago

    No surprise

    1
    Reply
    • Fever Pitch Guy

      4 months ago

      Fenway – The only one with the Red Sox that is really pushing his signing is BFF Cora. I think this is another classic case of the Red Sox not seriously pursuing a free agent, but keeping themselves “in the mix” in case a big discount falls in their lap. And trying to sell more tickets to casual fans by making them believe they will sign a big name like Bregman.

      And for the love of God, can they stop with the “Bregman’s right-handed bat is an ideal fit for Boston’s lefty-tilted lineup”.

      Bregman’s got major reverse splits each of the past three years, he has sucked against LHP each of the past 3 years. Expecting him to suddenly turn that around is beyond foolish.

      17
      Reply
      • WaitTil2026

        4 months ago

        Well, Kennedy is taking Cora’s side on this one.

        I’m totally fine letting Bregman sign elsewhere. He does NOT make sense for the Red Sox on a 5-6 year deal. Even a 4 year deal might be a stretch.

        Franklin Arias broke the MLB Pipeline top 100. Currently playing SS, though I could imagine him shifting to 3B in a couple years. Cespedes is another “shortstop” who isn’t going to last at the position.

        7
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Wait – Kennedy is the President and CEO, he isn’t as involved in baseball operations as Breslow/Cora are. Kennedy is just doing P.R. as usual, trying to keep fans excited.

          BTW – It’s been reported by multiple sources the Sox haven’t made an offer to Bregman yet.

          Mayer is also definitely a 3B candidate down the road.

          4
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          I suspect Kennedy is a lot more involved than you think — having a non-baseball person meddling with baseball operations explains a lot of what has happened over the last few years.

          4
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Wait – Well one of my concerns is that Breslow doesn’t have as much clout in player decisionmaking as he should, so Kennedy meddling (along with Henry) wouldn’t be a surprise. But ultimately the decision should be made by Breslow as long as it falls within the budget he was given.

          8
          Reply
        • Dogbone

          4 months ago

          As a Cubs fan, I wish the Red Sox great success in their pursuit of Bregman. Go get him!
          And this off-season again, we see the smoke that Borass blows up there guys gut – seems to have exposed Borass’ b s.

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          Fever, I don’t think they have a set budget, and I don’t think Kennedy is allowing Breslow the control he needs to do the job right. My guess is that Breslow has already spent all that he is permitted, but that Kennedy might make an “exception” for Bregman. Lousy way to run an organization.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Wait – So you think no extensions over the next 3 months? I strongly disagree, there will be at least one and probably two with Crochet, Anthony and Campbell being top candidates (Roman will be hard though).

          4
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          Agree Fever on Mayer but if a deal could be made, I’d prefer Arenado despite others not wanting him due to his “decline”.

          2
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          Breslow would have been a fool to not gain more clout than Bloom had and one thing about him is he’s pretty much always the smartest one in the room.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          dewey – Cora has stated if they acquire Arenado it would be for third base only, so obviously that would be contingent on Devers moving.

          I know Cora lies often, but on this I believe him.

          5
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          dewey – Breslow was in the exact same position as Bloom, he had zero experience as the head of baseball ops when he took the job.

          So it’s understandable that he would not have much clout while learning on the job.

          4
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          No, I think they’ll find a budget for extensions, but I believe their FA budget is spent.

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          Note that long term extensions don’t impact the actual payroll for 2025 by much. The AAV may count towards the luxury tax, but we are nowhere near that yet. Might as well structure things to utilize that luxury tax space that we haven’t spent.

          1
          Reply
        • KingKen

          4 months ago

          Not sure why you put decline in quotes commenting about Arenado. He’s been in clear decline both offensively and defensively for a few years now, and isn’t likely to reverse course on either.

          2
          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          Fever, Merloni said that they had made him an offer but were far apart in years.

          1
          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          Fever, that is a no-brainer. Arenado has no value at 1B and Devers hurts the team by playing 3B. The Red Sox need a 3B now, not a possibility down the road, so waiting for prospects to maybe take over that position in a year or two when you have a good team now is not the smartest move.

          1
          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          4 months ago

          If the FA budget is spent they were certainly deceptive in being in on all of the high dollar free agents. Considering they were supposed to be in on Soto for $700 million, they are not coming close to the all in claim they were making. I was buying into them doing everything needed to be competitive for the playoffs. They may actually be able to do it, but not by getting any of the top free agents. If they don’t make any other moves, I will have very little trust in anything they say in the future.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Dog – So true. Notice the Boras players get all the publicity, the players with other agents get virtually none … like Povetta.

          3
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Pads – Thanks, Loomer I trust.

          3
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Pads – There’s a lot involved in moving the face of the franchise with that much money remaining on his contract. And other players would be impacted.Gotta look at the big picture.

          3
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Uncle – It was confirmed Soto was offered 15 years @ $40M. That 2025 money was spent on Buehler, Sandoval, Chapman.

          3
          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          4 months ago

          They had said they were going for pitching as well as the bat of Soto, so there should have been more than just the money they would have put into Soto as they really did not have the pitching needed to compete. Now they have improved the pitching but not the bat.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Uncle – I always say actions speak louder than words. Once again they proved to be full of crap. No Sox fans trust them, and rightfully so.

          2
          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          4 months ago

          Looks like Bregman will be heading back to the Astros after they just traded Pressly to free up some money.

          3
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Uncle – That’s a good thing for the Red Sox, and I’m happy for the Astros. I know he means a lot to Altuve and the others there.

          1
          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          4 months ago

          I know Bregman was not a great fit, but was hoping to see someone added to the offense. I think some of the other options were probably better, but at this point I assume we will be waiting until 2026 for them to bring in offense because there is not much left.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          Fever, here’s an interesting read (although I majored in Finance, I long for the days when fans could be just fans…).

          ……….

          Jarren Duran’s contract, the Red Sox, the luxury tax, and Alex Bregman – Over the Monster search.app/RyDg9tZz9BZBzNpM9

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          Yeah, that’s an added benefit of getting long term deals done early, keeps the AAV lower.

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          Wait, too complicated for most of us fans who just want the roster constructed.

          1
          Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        4 months ago

        Like he’s had in Houston. That said, his versatility with the glove is what makes him more valuable (but I’d still prefer Arenado).

        Reply
      • Pads Fans

        4 months ago

        At Fan Fest on the 11th when asked by Lou Merloni Kennedy spoke about several players that would be a “perfect fit” and one of those was Bregman. There is a video of him on NESN talking with Lou Merloni and Tom whatever his last name is..

        1
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Pads – I believe Sam said it, but I’m guessing it was in response to being asked about Bregman because Kennedy is the only Sox owner who talks now and he wants to excite the fanbase with deception. He is not part of baseball ops.

          3
          Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        4 months ago

        Dewey – Bregman just won a GG. He’s a lot better defensively than Arenado at this point.

        3
        Reply
    • CalcetinesBlancos

      4 months ago

      Bregman had to decide what his goal is. If it’s to get every last dollar he should find a one year deal and show that his relative down year was a fluke. If he just wants to sign a long term deal he needs to choose one and get ready for the season.

      2
      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        4 months ago

        Cal – Pretty sure he wants the most money AND to stay with Houston. No different than Teo w/ LAD.

        3
        Reply
    • letitbelowenstein

      4 months ago

      Henry: See? We tried. Just like with Soto. (puts checkbook back in pocket, walks away whistling)

      1
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        4 months ago

        Lol. Like I once did when my parents said they couldn’t afford my birthday present and I found it in the trunk on my way to school. Seriously, I have no problem with putting a line in the sand with Bregman. I also believe they gave up too much for Crochet but will extend him. Hopefully I’m wrong on the first part.

        1
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Dewey- You don’t hope you’re wrong on Crochet?

          If they rush into a 6-figure extension with him and he pulls a Sale/deGrom/Strasburg that would set back the organization in a big way.

          4
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          Fever, what happens if they drag their feet, sign him to a much bigger deal in a year or two, and THEN he pulls a Sale/deGrom/Strasburg? Are the odds of that worse if they sign him when he is 25 or wait to sign him at 27? Will a year or two of health prove anything?

          A team gets six low-risk years of control through the arbitration system. Beyond that, you can’t win if you don’t play. The Red Sox haven’t played in the top-tier market since trading away Betts because they didn’t want to pay him. Second-tier free agents like Story and Yoshida are NOT the equivalent.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Wait – It’s a very unique situation in determining how much to offer him this offseason, I can’t think of any other reliever who had TJS and then converted to a starter for half a season and then converted to an opener for another half season.

          First I’ll say under no scenario would I attempt to sign him in two years when he’s a free agent. When players become free agents, they tend to become much more expensive than the year before … we certainly saw that with Xander, Judge, etc.

          What do you consider “much bigger deal” in a year? I think worst case scenario, his price goes up 50% which means perhaps from $100M to $150M.

          Yes absolutely a year of 180 IP with a sub-3.25 ERA would be conclusive proof that he’s fully healthy and can handle the role of ace starting pitcher. Because as of right now he has proved, zippo, zilch, nada.

          Maybe you didn’t see any of my prior posts, there were SEVERAL huge red flags with him last year.

          Converted from a starting pitcher to an opener after just 3 months, much earlier than one would expect.

          Pitched only 44 innings after June 30th and got absolutely hammered. One would think he would have been even more dominant as an opener because he could air it out in the short outings. But no, the opposite happened.

          Insisted on an extension if any contending postseason team were to acquire him. So even HE was clearly concerned about his health. And I pointed this out before, if he HAD gotten traded last summer would he have demanded to pitch only 44 innings in the second half? Obviously all teams stayed away from him, for good reason.

          Sorry but as of right now he’s a very high risk pitcher, waiting one year before an extension is as important as getting a professional inspection before buying a house.

          And remember, I had the same concerns about Story and Giolito before the Red Sox gave mistake contracts to them.

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          i saw your earlier posts, just disagree and don’t feel like arguing. You exaggerate the change in his role – he went from 6 and 7 inning starts to 4 inning starts, and ended with just under 150 innings on the season. His velocity and command were intact. His ERA was elevated, partly due to home runs and partly due to playing on a minor league team while facing major league hitters, but his FIP was very solid. No hint of injury or fatigue.

          Don’t think I was around here when you were posting on Story, but that was a known injury. Don’t recall what you said about Giolito, though there the warning signs were much clearer and I would have agreed with you.

          If Crochet puts up 180 innings with the numbers you suggest – in Fenway – the price tag easily exceeds $200M. He would have no reason to rush to sign a deal that costs him $100M in earnings.

          Crochet is neck and neck with Skubal in talent. You aren’t getting Skubal at $150M just one year removed from free agency. If you want that kind of discount then you need to work a deal while there is still some uncertainty.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Wait – I view it as discussions, not arguments. But I presented all facts, so what’s there to disagree with?

          If you want to say his 44 innings of 4.84 ERA pitching was because he suddenly went from very lucky to very unlucky, I can’t dispute that because it can’t be proven either way.

          However I will say it’s illogical to blame his awful second half performance on the exact same “minor league team” he was on when he put up a 3.02 ERA in the first half …. right?

          But I’ll let it go, we will find out soon enough if he is extended this offseason and then we will see how he pitches.

          Hopefully if he puts up a 4-ERA on the season you don’t blame it all on Devers ;O)

          Just to clarify again, I’m not questioning Crochet’s talent at all …..you don’t need to convince me he’s very talented.

          I’m only questioning whether he’s physically able to pitch well for at least 180 innings this season. It’s a justified concern supported with facts.

          Yeah I was on an island with both Story and Giolito, my exact words were “any of the Top 5 shortstops except Story” and “any of the Top 5 SP except Giolito”..

          It’s almost as if Bloom & Breslow (and Cora) were reading my comments and intentionally got the only players that I didn’t want. LOL!!

          BTW – If you’re saying the package that Breslow gave up for Crochet could have gotten Skubal (because you think Crochet is as valuable as Skubal) then that would make the Crochet trade look even worse ;O)

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          I focus more on the peripherals than on ERA, especially over smaller samples. ERA takes a couple hundred innings for the randomness to average out.

          I doubt Skubal was available. The White Sox gave up one of the best pitchers in the majors for a very reasonable cost. Only the Red Sox would be foolish enough not to take full advantage of that by signing him to a multi year deal.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          wait – I also am certain Skubal wasn’t available, but if he had been his value would be a lot higher than Crochet despite the fact Skubal is almost 3 years older than Crochet.

          You know why?

          Because Skubal pitched 192 innings last year with a 2.39 ERA … and that was despite the fact he pitched only 80 innings the prior year.

          They are both on the same free agent timeline, it will be very interesting to see who gets extended first and for how much.

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          Right. So you can extend Crochet relatively cheaply now, or give him a Skubal contract after he proves his talent over a full season. I think you are underestimating what Crochet will command if he turns in a Cy Young season.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Wait – I honestly haven’t thought about what he would command in that scenario, as it would be unfair to have those expectations of anyone who is unproven.

          I agree with you, if he does win the Cy this year then he would probably command a $250M-$300M extension.

          Let’s hope the Red Sox know a lot more about his health than the public does, and they act accordingly. Believe me I’d love to have another ace comparable to prime Sale, Pedro and Clemens. In fact if that happens, I wouldn’t even care if Teel becomes a HOF’er.

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          Hard to say exactly how good he is until we see him on a more competitive club. I think he could be Sale. Clemens was a long time ago, tough to compare across eras. And nobody was comparable to Pedro.

          2
          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          4 months ago

          Wait-I appreciate the last sentence. I agree I don’t think there ever will be another Pedro. Something about the combination of enthusiasm, incredible talent, and his sense of humor, it really kept you coming back to see what he would do next. It has been a while since we have had someone close to that caliber on the Red Sox. I wish we could have seen more of Sale at his best.

          I have not actually watched Crochet pitch, so can only go by the potential he has shown based on his stats. With his age and coming onto a more successful team, hopefully he will continue to get better. Have no idea if he has Cy Young potential, but will be thrilled if he does. I wish the Sox had improved the defense a bit as that was certainly not a strength last year and can impact the success of the pitchers.

          1
          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          He threw a dominant game against the Red Sox in June. The crazy thing is that he wasn’t anywhere near his best and he STILL struck out ten with just three hits in six innings.

          If he is healthy, he will reach 180 innings and be among the top three (at least’ for the Cy). Hard to assess his injury risk, though. They leashed him at mid season last year to keep the innings down.

          Reply
    • Zerbs63

      4 months ago

      I thought there were at least 5 teams that were offering 5 year deals?

      1
      Reply
      • Dorothy_Mantooth

        4 months ago

        I’m thinking there is no way the Astros 6/$156M is still on the table. If it was, Bregman would jump at that now given what he’s seen on the free agent market to date.

        1
        Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          You are saying that even though there are multiple articles quoting Astros execs saying it is still on the table?

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 months ago

          I’d be very surprised at this point.

          1B-Walker
          2B-Altuve
          3B-Paredes
          DH-Alvarez

          They won’t add $156M to their CBT to replace one of those players. I’d bet on that.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Dottie – If they have no intention of pulling the offer before ST then why would he rush to take it now?

          3
          Reply
        • KingKen

          4 months ago

          I think the Astros offer is still on the table provided they can convince Pressly to waive the no-trade protection and allow himself to be traded somewhere so they can clear the salary and more easily fit Bregman’s dollars into their overall budget. So far there’s been no movement on resolving the Pressly situation.

          1
          Reply
      • WaitTil2026

        4 months ago

        Supposedly (Alex Speier) the Red Sox are holding the line at 4.

        2
        Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          …and as you said, 4 years is generous. I wouldn’t go more than 3.

          Reply
        • WaitTil2026

          4 months ago

          I would go five, if I really wanted to land him, but that would be with the understanding that the last two years are likely mediocre.

          Doesn’t work for the Red Sox unless they are willing to cut bait on Yoshida, though.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Wait – I assume it also doesn’t work unless Devers moves to DH, right?

          What did you think about Devers liking a tweet that suggested that exact scenario? Was that really him, or just a hoax?

          1
          Reply
  2. Pedro Martinez’s Mango Tree

    4 months ago

    Yep, same old cheap Red Sox

    3
    Reply
    • BigRedMachine

      4 months ago

      Why is a four year offer cheap? I am sure it is for a large sum of money and I understand that after a 10 year deal with Devers and a 6 year $144 with Story they may not want to do a six year deal again with an aging 3b.

      13
      Reply
      • Pedro Martinez’s Mango Tree

        4 months ago

        Because every offer to every free agent is just short. Player wants 5-6 years? Team draws line in the sand at 4. They want the player to assume all the risk when everyone knows if you want to sign a free agent you’re going to have to sacrifice an extra year or two

        5
        Reply
        • BigRedMachine

          4 months ago

          There is truth that players want 5-6 years, fair or not fair that the Red Sox draw a line in the sand at four, I can see that they have been burned by their T. Story deal and may be reluctant. You are right though, not going past four years may mean they don’t get Bregman.

          1
          Reply
        • Joemo

          4 months ago

          BigRed – so just because a team was burned by a bad deal once or twice, they should just stop giving them out? That makes no sense.

          Maybe they shouldn’t have spent a ton on Story when they had Xander, and I’m not entirely sure why they went after a LH soft hitting DH who can’t play the field and paid him a ton of money.

          They need to focus on adding good players.

          1
          Reply
        • KingKen

          4 months ago

          And if 6 years were so easonable an ask from Bregman he would have been signed by someone already. But every other team sees the same risks the Sox do in giving him a longer deal and aren’t interested in going there. But of course idiot Sox fans will simply cry “they’re being cheap” because that’s all they know what to do recently.

          11
          Reply
        • BigRedMachine

          4 months ago

          No, I agree, it should not stop a competing team from improving and still making long term offers but I would it matters who you make that offer to, especially positionally, if you have a huge need positionally , say you don’t have a SS or a #1 or #2 starter you have to do it but I don’t see a “must have” need for Bregman, you do have Devers and Casas, Bregman is a good player and lengthens that line-up in every way but i think the Sox need a #1 starter who has a history of durability and staying healthy more than they need Bregman.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          While I’ve been so against ownership recently, I too would not sign Bregman for more than four guaranteed years. Maybe a five year deal with an injury kicker like they did before. Make the fifth year guaranteed only if he plays X number of games in year four. Different. Also have opt outs after years two onward.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          Joe, X is overpaid. Signing Story in hindsight was stupid but Yoshida was not. The fact that it hasn’t been as successful so far as they hoped, doesn’t change the fact that he was injured last year and is a solid hitter. That said, the majority of the long contracts have not worked out for owners. Free agency is also not good for the fans. I said it two years ago, allow teams to spend more to keep their own players without taxes/penalties. Maybe also instead of just giving small market clubs money, link it to them extending their own players. If they don’t spend, they don’t get.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Mango – Yep the Red Sox want what they view as a bargain, always.

          Same reason why they haven’t snagged a stud reliever, they will probably sign whatever is left when all the other teams are done shopping.

          4
          Reply
        • Lalo says show me

          4 months ago

          If the short term deal includes opt outs the risk is as much on the team
          If bregman has a crap year next year and got, say, 4/110 with opt outs every year, he would likely not opt out next year and the team would be stuck with him
          On the other hand, if he has a good year, he’ll test the market again and the original team that signed him to a 4 year deal has to look for a 3b yet again

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Lalo – And one other negative about Bregman opting out after one year ….. the team that signs him now will be penalized because he’s a QO free agent.

          4
          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          Dewey, I have to disagree on Yoshida.

          The fact is he was and remains a *terrible* signing for Boston and is a huge part of the lineup logjam.

          The problems with Yoshida are he is a defensive liability who can’t run on the basepaths. And that has nothing to do with any injury, it’s the lack of tools.

          He doesn’t have the pop to be a dedicated DH especially at his salary level.

          If healthy he can hit from the left side, for average, maybe, and without much pop. But none of those are things the red sox needed, let alone to have tied up so much payroll in at a time Henry got a little tight on the pursestrings.

          4
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          dewey – What they need is a solid catcher, that should be their top priority. They do not need a 2B except maybe a stopgap for one year. And they do not need a 3B unless they are prepared to move Devers now.

          The Sox front office is extremely dysfunctional and isn’t getting better. They should be focusing on their true needs, targeting the best players to fill those needs, and spending the money to fill those needs.

          3
          Reply
        • KingKen

          4 months ago

          Yoshida is very much a continuation of some of the FO meddling from guys like Kennedy and Warner that has hurt the team over the past decade. His signing was along the lines of the Rusney Castillo debacle. The Sox missed out on Jose Abreu when he came out of Cuba, so jumped at giving a big contract to Castillo, hoping he’d be at worst about 80% the player Abreu was. Turned out he was about 20% the player Abreu was. Then when the Sox missed out on Seiya Suzuki they tossed a large contract at Yoshida, hoping for largely the same thing. One of these days someone with the team may finally realize that if you miss out on a player just move on and don’t try to jump at a “poor man’s” version of them. That never works.

          2
          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          What’s worse about Yoshida is I can almost guarantee there’s a vocal contingent somewhere in the front office/ownership grouping that blames how the recent pursuits of NPB pitching went poorly on Yoshida dissatisfaction with his handling and being stuck in the DH slot because he’s such a bad all-around ballplayer.

          It’s not his fault he’s slower than Papi, is an atrocious defender, and lacks the power to hit for impact in the dh slot.

          Bloom *knew* what he was, and *knew* boston was stacked with cheap controllable high quality defending OFers knocking on the door who could hit better than Yoshida, but, overpaid him to come to town anyways.

          2
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          The Red Sox are avoiding bad deals which is part of being a well-run organization.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Ken – That’s a take I haven’t heard before, where is the evidence it was ownership meddling with Yoshida? Everything I’ve seen and heard indicates Bloom was the driving force behind the Yoshida signing. Was he overpaid? Of course, but that’s because Bloom was horrible at valuing players.

          Yoshida was highly rated and he was also expected to help lure Yamamoto …. same approach the Dodgers used when Ohtani helped lure Yamamoto.

          3
          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          Suit – they’re also avoiding good deals in the process. That doesn’t make it a well-run organization, just ome that is so risk averse that they hurt themselves

          4
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          GaSox – Don’t make me defend Bloom! Haha!!

          Abreu was acquired only a few months before the Yoshida signing and wasn’t considered a top prospect, Duran was a mess at the time, and Roman was drafted 79th just a few months before the Yoshida signing. There was absolutely no way for Bloom to predict how the OF would play out.

          5
          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          Fever – nobody, EVER, had Yoshida as even an average defender. The universal book on him was slow, weak arm, couldnt chase down balls in the OF.

          You had the IF as a mess defensively already as well.

          There was no single positive aspect to Yoshida’s game that fit anything boston needed at the time, unless you wanted to cite to ‘warm body’ let alone at that absurd price-point, that couldn’t be bought at a cheaper price for fewer years without going to him.

          The only thought was putting him on the left side, behind *Devers* and the black hole that was SS. Which, makes those two positions even worse because you didn’t have someone backing up the missed plays the IF let through. You were just adding to guaranteed hits on the porous left side defense.

          Reply
        • Cubs missed players

          4 months ago

          Dewey I agree teams that sign their own free agent players should get a discount on the luxury tax calculation.

          1
          Reply
        • Ketch

          4 months ago

          And last year that strategy worked on Bellinger, Snell, Chapman and Montgomery.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Cubs – That serves no purpose. Teams that can’t afford to extend their own players will trade them to teams that can afford to extend them. We saw that with Soto, Mookie and so many others.

          1
          Reply
        • steldarl87

          4 months ago

          Come talk to us in four years to tell us how great Tanner Scott’s contract panned out over the life of that contract.

          1
          Reply
        • steldarl87

          4 months ago

          Fever do you have an inside seat that forms the basis for your “dysfunctional” observation?

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          GA. Many knew he couldn’t run but most expected him to at least play a competent left. No one knew when was signed that Duran would suddenly be a stud, that Abreu would be a ROTY candidate or that Anthony would suddenly be the number one prospect in the sport. He was signed to be a lefty who didn’t strike out and would hit .300 with a little pop. If he is healthy, I still believe he can win a batting title with that stroke. So far, I e been proven wrong but let’s see.

          1
          Reply
        • Joemo

          4 months ago

          Red – I agree with all your points here, I don’t think they need to sign Bregman (especially with Mayer, Campbell, and the wealth of MI guys they have) and wish they actually invested in Fried/Burnes/etc. But hey, it is what it is .

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          Fever, I’ve been saying Devers needs to be moved off third for a long time. He got his money and now needs to accept it’s best for the team. As for catcher, I thought we had him but obviously that’s changed. I’d settle for a Leon type who could handle the staff and control the running game if I couldn’t find a true hitter. Wong was fine with the bat but he’s too small and wore down. To me, Wong should be developed to be that super utility player.

          Reply
        • Joemo

          4 months ago

          Dewey – x is overpaid but instead of signing Story they could have used that money to extend Xander at a reasonable price and not let him hit FA.

          The Yoshida signing was stupid because of the Sox offer. How often does Scott Boras not try to create a bidding war? You combine that with how left hand heavy the current lineup was and how all the good prospects coming up at the time were LHB and it makes less sense. Go look at the stats for pure DH players. Yoshida is a slightly above average bat but is nowhere near good enough for a full-time DH and his defensive issues were known before he signed.

          I agree about free agency, it’s bad for small market teams, and for teams not willing to spend. In theory, teams willing to spend can overpay for guys now and when the contract looks bad they can eat some of the money and trade the player. If the team has success and brings in more money during their tenure, then the team can just rinse and repeat this process.

          I kind of like the NBA process where, and this might be incorrect but I like the idea anyways, some players are eligible for bigger contracts with their current team and the contracts pay more to the player than they count for towards the luxury tax. This would give the small market teams a reason to extend their homegrown guys.

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          Cubs, I’ve been saying it at times for the last three or more years when the deal is four or more years. Such benefits both the team and the player. I don’t think the PL would argue against it and agents like Boras’ would be drooling with the prospect of having the Yankees bid against the Mets for Soto knowing the Yankees’ taxes would be less than normal. Such would theoretically have allowed them to use that savings towards Bregman, etc. The only catch I would add is the player has to play the full year before for his old club. If not, it would be interesting in that The Dodgers or Mets for example could swing a trade for Guerrero at the deadline even if they don’t need him immediately. Why? Just to gain that tax advantage for the following free agency period.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          dewey – Great post! There’s no question in my mind if Yoshida can just stay physically healthy and strong for a full season, he could be a batting champion.

          His defense is below average, but not a big deal playing LF at Fenway.

          Who cares about speed? Was Manny or Ortiz or a bunch of others fast? Nobody expected Yoshida to be Ichiro.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          Fever, nothing wrong with that if it’s implemented with other rules like an otherwise hard cap/floor. Theoretically, it will improve the return going to the trading team as well

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Dewey – Last year Jansen and Wong were statistically two of the three worst catchers in MLB.

          I’d go all out to acquire Raleigh, he would be perfect for the Sox.

          1
          Reply
        • foppert3

          4 months ago

          Bit of fan experience here with the short term opt out. The risk is minimised.

          Rodon. Got a great year out of him. He moved on. They seemed content with replacing him. No biggie. All square.

          Snell didn’t work out. Crushed us early with poor performance and then pitched himself to a big contract elsewhere when it was too late for the team. No good but it was a short term burn of $30m.

          Stripling was bad. Had to opt in. Got traded before he went around again. Bad but not crippling. Short term burn of 12m or so.

          Conforto. Average. Averageness had him opting in and averageness has him moving on to a 1 year contract that is below, but in the range of what the Giants paid him. Not great but not overly detrimental.

          Chapman. Impressed on and off the field. One year in and they liked him and he liked them. Both committed long term. Awesome.

          Some good, some bad, some average but nothing crushing. The FO just has to put the work in on replacing guys or getting them back.

          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          Red Sox lost Betts, Bogaerts, and several free agents because they drew a line in the sand on contract length.

          They have added or extended several players because they would sign for that “magic” number of years the Red Sox drew in the sand like Story, Yoshida, and Bello that have not worked out well.

          Its time to rethink that number of years they are willing to go on contracts.

          One run to the WS is worth $150 million the way the playoffs are set up today, a little more if the team comes from a WC spot. Get the guy that can get you closer to that goal and being in the playoffs each year early in the deal will pay for those down years at the end of the contract.

          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          Devers hurts the team every game he is still playing 3B. He can hit. There is no argument against that. What he can’t do is play defense. He would have had a 3.9 WAR at DH in 2024 and the positional adjustment is huge between DH and 3B. That is how bad his defense was.

          Adding Bregman puts a 4+ WAR at 3B with a guy that can play defense and increases the production at DH by 2+ WAR. The team is better.

          Remember, Bregman had a 4.1 WAR last season, better than Devers 3.7 WAR, and that is considered a down year for him. He was better than Devers at 3B in a down year. Devers would have had a higher WAR at DH than 3B. This all clicking for you?

          Pay the man. Go win the East.

          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          Signing Yoshida was moronic at best. A guy who had a history of playing bad defense and a large platoon split signed for 5 years and stuck in the OF in Fenway. What could go wrong? 2 seasons of 1.4 WAR is what.

          Now he injured his throwing shoulder and had to have labrum surgery, an injury many players never recover fully from, and they are saying he will “play lots of games in the outfield”. Talk about doubling down on stupidity.

          Go through contracts of 6+ years on Cots Baseball Contracts. Then look at the value of WAR for free agents. Then tell us how many of them worked out. Its over 60%. If they didn’t work out for the team more often than not then the billionaires and the Ivy League people they have running both baseball ops and the front office would not keep doing those deals.

          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          GASox. Bingo!

          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          GASox, I don’t think the decision to sign Yoshida came from Bloom.

          Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          All, Well run organizations are in the playoffs 3 of 5 years, not in last place 3 of 5 years.

          Reply
        • TB Sox NY

          4 months ago

          Do you think he has no power or a bad shoulder led to his lack of power?

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          ….and the Red Sox fired the guy who led them to the 3 last place finishes (Bloom).

          Reply
        • foppert3

          4 months ago

          A 60% success rate is not enough for many. It’s why they don’t do it. They can’t afford to cover a 40% chance of failure.

          Reply
        • ffrhb14Sox

          4 months ago

          If you never sign a free agent you can totally avoid all risk…that’s not good management. The best management knows when they need to take a risk and when they don’t. With the talent in waiting, they didn’t need to take a risk on Story but did and got burned. Bergman also feels like a nice to have, not a need to have. They should be trading Abreu, Yoshida, and some mid prospects to get pitching at this point.

          1
          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          Yoshida has always historically lacked power in his swing. It wasn’t the labrum issue sapping it.

          It’s like ichiro except without the speed, baserunning instincts or defense/fielding ability.

          He has bat to ball skills, but, not much else in his favor.

          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          4 months ago

          I just wish they would not hype up that this is going to be such a big offseason and continue to say the top priority is a right handed hitter if they are not going to make a move. If they just said they were going to improve the pitching, they did seem to do that. They lost O’Neill’s bat and did not replace it yet, so someone else is going to have to pick up the offense or that could be what holds them back. Maybe Story will rebound or the young guys will come up blazing, but can’t count on it. Not that Bregman was the ideal solution, but unfortunately these days they have to overpay for everyone so most of the deals are going to be bad.

          Reply
      • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

        4 months ago

        If they really did make a $700 million offer to Soto, 6 years and under $200 million does not seem nearly as high risk. Not that Bregman is in the same league as Soto based on age and offensive ability, but for a team that is supposedly all in to make the playoffs they are getting outspent by most of the other teams who promised their fans they would make a big splash.

        Reply
    • cttigersfan

      4 months ago

      I don’t agree that the Red Sox are being cheap, they’re being smart just like the Tigers, Cubs, Jays because none of them want to give Bregman a long term contract.

      10
      Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3

        4 months ago

        The Astros have never pulled their offer off the table. The Tigers, Sox, Cubs are angling for 2nd place in case the Astros can’t trade Pressly or free up a few bucks to make sure their offer is solvent.
        The comments here seem to hit on the salient points:
        1) the Sox need a talent infusion/upgrade
        2) getting a 3B is a square peg for a round hole for 2025
        3) you can’t never again stretch an offer out of your comfort zone to a FA if you want to get a star player (not that I think Bregman is that guy)

        Here’s my two cents:
        Lets keep our powder dry, just in case Vladdy isn’t pulling our chain(I think he is) and it’s clear that the POBO whether it’s Breslow or Bloom, or whomever, isn’t running baseball operations, it’s ownership and Kennedy

        1
        Reply
        • Kyle 12

          4 months ago

          The Sox are getting a talent infusion/upgrade with the likes of Roman Anthony, Kristian Campbell and Marcelo Mayer. Why would they give blank check to a significantly more expensive option who’s clearly on the downswing of his career who doesn’t fit their needs?

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          Sad, of course Vlade is using the Sox with his mouth as leverage. Only two cities for him. If not Toronto, it will be New York.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Sad – I don’t think Vlad is a good fit. I believe in spending to fill needs, if Casas returns to 2023 form then he and Devers should cover 1B/DH for years to come.

          2
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3

          4 months ago

          FPG – I don’t believe that you can allow a player that’s 25yo and at the peak of his career just explore free agency without kicking the tires. He’s saying lots of nice things about the Sox (Papi and Pedro connections). I think he’s going to the Mets, but you have to at least be in the conversation.
          Now about fit. The Jays are saying that if they don’t sign a 3B this off season that Vladdy could return to his original position and play 3rd. For everyone who wants/expects Devers to become full time DH, this is the ULTIMATE fit. I don’t want Bregman, he’s not a fit.
          Going forward an infield of Casas, Campbell, Mayer and Guerrero is pretty enticing.
          The game is increasing played by players who are young and play on athletic ability alone. The art of being a baseball player is going the way of the dinosaur (unfortunately in my opinion). Successful teams will follow a dual track of homegrown re cheap talent, and young stars, who are expensive.
          It’s time for everyone to let the Story signing go and admit that you need to spend money to make money (so to speak), and perhaps sign a contract that you know may be underwater at the end of it.
          We need a right handed power bat, and someone has decided that 3/$80ish is too much for Pete Alonso, but couldn’t see their way to sign Profar.
          This idea that having a third of your 26 man roster on one year deals makes you fiscally responsible is idiotic. Maybe the new CBA might bail owners out, and maybe that’s the strategy, but prices aren’t going down….
          Devers had Wong behind him most of last year, imagine if he had a real power threat behind him and he actually didn’t have to swing at bad pitches?
          This is a long winded way of saying, I don’t have the answers, but, I am unwilling to allow one of the riches teams in the game to tell its fans that mediocrity equals fiscal responsibility and piecing together just enough each year to say “we tried” is the surest way to make me a fan of whatever team Dave Dombrowski works for!

          1
          Reply
      • Kyle 12

        4 months ago

        Exactly. I want $35/hour + full benny’s to flip burgers. I’m just waiting on all the cheap restaurants to cave and pay me what I think I’m due.

        2
        Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          Kyle, would you settle for $25? That’s what I was paying for help in my home. in addition to the burger flipping though, you would have to clean the kitchen and the bathroom.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Kyle – I’d love to see Bregman sit out the season if he doesn’t get what he wants. Maybe his mom has room in her basement?

          2
          Reply
    • Poolhalljunkies

      4 months ago

      Have you even considered they dont need him and only want a deal on thier terms? If he doesnt want thier offer fine he can move on and the sox dont care and have lost nothing..if he takes it grear for the sox…its really that simple imo

      4
      Reply
    • all in the suit that you wear

      4 months ago

      Every situation is different. In this case, Bregman is 31 and may be in decline. I don’t really want him, but I wouldn’t be too upset to get him on a 2 or 3 year deal.

      Reply
    • Rsox

      4 months ago

      Honestly though, they have a 3B and middle Infielders to spare. Bregman only makes sense if they have a taker for Yoshida and Devers is amicable to being a DH. If not than its spending on unnecessary position while likely creating clubhouse issues that don’t need to be there

      3
      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 months ago

        Bergman makes no sense, imo. We have someone at every position. The only question marks we have is at 2nd and SS, and we have Grissom and Campbell looking at 2nd, and Story and Mayer looking at SS.

        Bregman is a better glove and a better fit. But basically, he pushes Yoshida out of the lineup, or better, off the team. It wouldn’t break my heart to see us sign him at maybe $125M/5, but I don’t see position players as our biggest need over the next 5 years.

        2
        Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        4 months ago

        Rsox – Voice of reason.

        Giving up on Grissom now would make the Sale trade an epic disaster.

        3
        Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          Fever, you can’t put lipstick on a pig and call it a beauty queen.

          Grissom is what he is. He will never amount to anything that lifts that trade out of disaster status.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          GASox – I’m all about patience and giving another chance, especially if a player has a bad season because of health reasons. Grissom went through a lot last year, missed all of ST, it was a nightmare season.

          But he DID finish the season with .333/.370/.417 for the month of September.

          Hey I’m not making any predictions here, and you already know how I feel about the Sale trade. But I don’t count out anybody just because they had health issues. Same with Casas, Yoshida, Devers …. let’s see if they are fully healthy and then see how they do.

          Have you been making the drive to Woosta in this winter weather? I’m guessing you didn’t attend FSG Fest ;o)

          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          Fever – Strong no on the FSG Fest. I’m due back up there Wednesday, I need to push that back a week due to a chest infection I’m just not kicking.

          My issue with grissom isn’t based on last season. It’s his entire time I saw him with atlanta and with their farm teams. We’re talking 5 underwhelming seasons, not just 1.

          Defensively he has the upside of Devers, except he gets worse and worse as you slide him across the diamond – check out his advanced fielding stats over the years.

          Realistically he best fits as a part time DH, and emergency depth until someone better gets called up if you have a guy go down. But, like Devers, and, like Yoshida, they should lock his glove behind several layers of steel for the protection of the team. No glove and you’d hope he’s not in the field, he doesn’t know how to use it properly anyways so let’s not have him hurt anyone

          Reply
    • aggee10

      4 months ago

      So not wanting to give a 30 yr old player on the decline a long term contract is cheap?… Ok. Lol

      1
      Reply
  3. mad1

    4 months ago

    Bregman only interested in Red Sox on long term deal

    Reply
  4. Troutahni

    4 months ago

    Truly Well Written! Be careful of the Athletic trying to sign you to a new contract, Mark Polishuk. Grammar and vocabulary? Top Notch!

    1
    Reply
    • Baseball’s Topics on Baseball Today

      4 months ago

      Mark “Passive Voice (Consider Revising)” Polishuk strikes again.

      Reply
  5. DroppedThirdStrike

    4 months ago

    I think Bergman’s problem is that he profiles more as a good, dependable player on both sides of the ball looking for a contract that will be pay him for all of his decline years, but doesn’t come with the upside of someone who can maybe put up a couple spectacular years to offset some of that decline.

    25
    Reply
    • Fever Pitch Guy

      4 months ago

      Dropped – Very well said! He’s still on the market because he’s not as valuable as he thinks, that’s the bottom line.

      3
      Reply
    • danumd87 2

      4 months ago

      Exactly. I think teams are concerned that given his age and recent performance that there’s no upside to a deal like the Astros have offered (or better). If you only see risk and loss at the end of the tunnel then it’s a bad contract and not worth it for the team. Bergman at 6/150 numbers is just a bad idea for any team.

      4
      Reply
  6. seamaholic 2

    4 months ago

    Good fit. Devers’ agent is posturing. He’s got his bag and knows he’s gonna have to move soon. Casas can and should be moved for pitching. Sox do this and I have no problem calling them co-favorites in the AL with the Yankees.

    2
    Reply
    • SJKinMD

      4 months ago

      They should absolutely not trade Casas to make room for Bregman.

      9
      Reply
      • MLB-1971

        4 months ago

        SJK – agreed! I would rather have Casas bat in the lineup than Bregman! Casas is under team control for another 4 years at league minimum then arbitration even if he is not extended.

        1
        Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          MLB, it depends on the return. I also love what I saw in Fitts. Such was a very small sample size but is it possible that he’s the young pitcher they’re trying to trade for and don’t realize they already have “their man”? The only reasons to trade Casas are will you replace him with a better defender who also balances out your lefty lineup better, does the return provide a better team fit and/or do you feel his rib injury will limit his future play? Nothing I’ve read suggests the latter.

          1
          Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          4 months ago

          Casas already had 2 years of service time and will be arbitration eligible after this season. Casas is a 1B who plays bad defense at that position and has the same OPS+ over the last 3 years as Bregman. Bregman plays Gold Glove level defense at the far more important 3B.

          It would not be Casas being traded to make room for Bregman, it would be Yoshida being traded. Devers to DH. Bregman at 3B.

          Reply
      • Pads Fans

        4 months ago

        They absolutely should not trade Casas. Period.

        They absolutely should trade Yoshida to make room for Devers at DH which makes room for Bregman at 3B.

        Bregman is better than Devers.
        2024: Bregman – 4.1 WAR Devers – 3.7 WAR
        Last 3 seasons: Bregman 13.6 WAR Devers 11.6 WAR

        Bregman has even been more durable the last 3 seasons.

        Devers is making $31.3 million AAV and his defense is so bad that his WAR would go up at DH. .

        2
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Pads – In your knee-jerk scenario the Sox would be trading Yoshida at a ridiculously worst time, which means eating nearly $56M of his contract. Does that really sound logical to you? Do you think $56M is peanuts to the Red Sox? And then watching him hit .300 for another team when he’s finally healthy? Hope you don’t invest in the stock market.

          Paying Bregman $30M annually who you don’t need, paying Yoshida to play elsewhere, and paying Devers $29M annually to DH. Dear God you have no concept of the value of money! Haha

          2
          Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          4 months ago

          Fpg, Yoshida had surgery that few ever fully recover from and he was bad before the surgery. That it was his throwing arm makes it 100% that he should never step on the grass again. If we have to eat 100% of his contract to get something in return, getting rid of him and moving Devers to DH will make us a better team and it’s not your money.

          We need Bregman or Arenado or another good defensive 3B.

          Devers is worth less as a 3B than as a DH because his defense is so bad. Several on here have pointed that out. We will still be paying him whether he is booting and waiving at balls that any good 3B would have made the play on or if he is doing what he does best at DH. Why are you so adamant that he play 3B and cost us wins? Its not your money and the Red Sox have plenty of revenue.

          Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          4 months ago

          Pads, not sure why you get what so many of us Red Sox fans miss. We are stuck with Devers contract so where he plays doesn’t matter. Whatever it takes we have to get him off 3B. He is a great hitter but one of the very worst defensive IF. He is costing us wins at 3B.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Baseball – Did you know last November Ohtani had the exact same labrum repair surgery that Yoshida had? And the Dodgers not only expect him back for Opening Day, they expect him to pitch this season.

          That’s not how players are valued. If a player is so bad that he can’t field a position, he is valued far less as a DH because literally anybody on the team can DH since they all swing the bat already (except for nearly all the pitchers).

          You know Devers was the primary 3B on the 2018 World Champions, right? And he was the primary 3B on the 2021 team that went to the ALCS.

          You’ve been missing my point. I’ve said many times Devers is bad at 3B and should be moved, That’s common knowledge, everyone knows it.

          Where I disagree is with those who believe he should go directly to DH this year. I believe he should be tried at 1B to see how he handles it, or make him part of a platoon at 3B.

          You want analytics to back up my stance? Okay, in Devers last healthy season (2023) he cost the team literally 9 runs based on DRS. How many games do you think those 9 runs resulted in them losing?

          BTW – JD Davis and Bohm were both statistically worse at 3B than Devers.

          Reply
  7. Goose

    4 months ago

    And now we know why the Red Sox don’t sign anyone. Bregman will sign somewhere else and the Red Sox will say they tried, again.

    Bregman just turned 30. You would think they would go to 5 years and be competitive with the other offers he has been getting, at a minimium. Offer 5 with a vesting option on the 6th and see if that gets it done. It isn’t like a contract that is carrying him into his late 30’s/early 40’s.

    Reply
    • KingKen

      4 months ago

      No, Bregman will be 31 in March. He didn’t “just turn 30” at all. And with the Sox competitive window just opening with all the young talent just breaking in or on the verge those later years are as important as the next couple are to their consideration. Locking into operatives lean years from Bregman as some of these younger guys are getting to their arb years and costing more will tie the Sox hands for making impact moves then. But it’s far easier to simply cry “cheap” and not understand all that.

      4
      Reply
      • danumd87 2

        4 months ago

        He’s truly a terrible fit for the Sox given the guys on their way to the bigs. Paying bregman big money to block your prospects while the big money player enters his decline is a way to guarantee organizational futility.

        3
        Reply
        • KingKen

          4 months ago

          Exactly. I’d rather just go into ST with the team as currently constructed and see a spirited competition between Grissom and Campbell to win the starting 2B job.

          3
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          You’re expecting all the prospects to be like Rice and Lynn or Ellabury and Predroia. Bregman or Arenado could be that missing piece for 25 or 26. Deals need to be paid based on expected performance. Pay less in the later years.

          2
          Reply
      • Goose

        4 months ago

        Why do you have multiple accounts coming from the same IP?

        Reply
    • OilCanLloyd

      4 months ago

      He turns 31 in March. I see why clubs are hesitant on longer guaranteed money. He’d be wise to see if Houston will still take him at 6/156.
      Houston would be wise to not do that deal.

      1
      Reply
      • stymeedone

        4 months ago

        According to what’s written, while the Astros have offered six years, the five year offers are for more money. Unless he’s completely done at the end of five years, any money on a new contract would be even more. Seems like a five year is the way to go.
        Still, someone’s definitely blowing smoke. If the Astros have offered six, than why would Boston think a 4 would even be an option? If Devers isn’t moving off 3B, than there is no shortage of players for positions in the Boston IF (Though he does need to be moved off 3B). It wouldn’t surprise me if Boras simply asked Houston to say the deal for six was still on the table to try to restart talks with viable teams, as a favor for past service. Not really believing any of it.
        Now can we get back to some Alonso rumors?

        2
        Reply
      • Pads Fans

        4 months ago

        Using 4.1 WAR as the baseline and adjusting for average MLB decline for their age 31 to 36 seasons, Bregman would provide $182-184 million in value at the current value of WAR in FA. That is a substantial surplus value on a 6/156 deal.

        That does not take into account that player salaries will go up and in 5 years the value of WAR in FA will be higher.

        A single run to the WS, even without winning, would pay the entire contract. 3 playoff appearances in 6 seasons, even without making it to the WS, would pay the entire contract.

        If that is all it would take to sign him, every team with a need at 3B should be in the bidding. Considering his consistency and durability, he has played the most games at 3B in MLB over last 3 seasons, that is about as much of a sure thing as you can get which is why the Astros offered that.

        That he is not signed yet is a clear indication that he wanted more than 6/156.

        Reply
  8. Lankster19

    4 months ago

    Just take Houston’s offer Bregman. It’s a solid deal so we can all move on

    12
    Reply
  9. Birdie man

    4 months ago

    Thought he had “multiple 5 year offers”.

    5
    Reply
  10. HalosHeavenJJ

    4 months ago

    That would be an odd defensive alignment in Houston.

    Bregman at third moving Devers to first is a solid defensive upgrade.

    2
    Reply
    • deweybelongsinthehall

      4 months ago

      Devers to DH is the solid upgrade. He’s to my knowledge never played the position

      1
      Reply
    • stymeedone

      4 months ago

      Just moving Devers off 3B is a solid defensive upgrade. Play anyone else at 3B.

      1
      Reply
  11. Payne Train

    4 months ago

    Cheater

    9
    Reply
  12. Joemo

    4 months ago

    Why splurge in Bregman when there are so many answers to the infield question. They should have splurged in adding established SP.

    I am 100% ok with not adding Bregman.

    3
    Reply
  13. bcjd

    4 months ago

    Four years, $120m, with player options for years five and six valued at $18mm per year. That makes him tradable if he opts in, but also lets him opt out and seek a bigger payday. It’s also decent guaranteed money for all six years. $156mm if he doesn’t opt out.

    Reply
  14. rsoxbob

    4 months ago

    Glad to hear of discipline by Sox on this. Rather see the youngsters given a chance at 2nd base and leave our corner infielders alone to rake in this lineup.

    2
    Reply
    • ROCKY07

      4 months ago

      Yeh….can’t wait to see Devers throw the ball into the right field stands…some defense…but he makes which I do agree with…but a liability defensively and Casas isn’t exactly Gold Glove either and don’t think you can put him into the “raking” catagory.

      Reply
  15. johncoltrane

    4 months ago

    Is it me
    Or are the redsox & bluejays always “interested” in every player
    But never actually sign anyone

    2
    Reply
    • Yanks4life22

      4 months ago

      Blue Jays are making big offers left and right though. Players are just turning them down. I guess they don’t want to play in Toronto? Tax rate? State of the country? Canadian economy? I dunno but it seems like a stigma bc they are offering some serious cash.

      1
      Reply
    • ROCKY07

      4 months ago

      And they both always want the player to change positions while trying to improve offensively/defensively…..

      Reply
    • MLB-1971

      4 months ago

      Writers throwing $hit on the internet for clicks and compensation. Most of the articles I see are team X should trade for, team Y sign so-n-so, team Z interested in with NO credibility source. Teams ‘check in’ on everyone even if they are not interested to gage industry prices of other players…. Most of the offseason articles and post are BS.

      2
      Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 months ago

      But never actually sign anyone
      ========================
      The BJs acquired Gimenez, Hoffman and Santander.

      The RS acquired Crocket, Chapman and Buehler.

      So aren’t going to acquire every player that they are interested in.

      Reply
  16. Bobby smac9

    4 months ago

    shockah

    Reply
  17. Ducey

    4 months ago

    Same old Boras.

    Ignore fair offer with current team. Check

    Drag free agency out until late February. Check

    Drop all kinds of rumours to try to establish a stronger market for his player. Check

    Actually get a good contract for his client. TBD

    8
    Reply
  18. SJKinMD

    4 months ago

    Bregman might make sense if they actually had a hole to fill at 2b or 3B. But they don’t. Devers is staying at 3B for the foreseeable future and Campbell (or Grissom) will be at 2b – and will probably outperform Bregman over the next several years. If Astros offer is still on the table he should take it.

    10
    Reply
    • Fever Pitch Guy

      4 months ago

      SJ – Exactly, and if Mayer gets promoted and shines then Story could move to 2B as well.

      5
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        4 months ago

        I’d love that Fever. Mayer being healthy takes the SS job and if Story is healthy, he’s as good defensively as anyone at second.

        1
        Reply
    • steldarl87

      4 months ago

      You guys have tremendous confidence that Campbell and Grissom will perform at a high level from the day their cleats hit the dirt. Having watched Jackson Holliday scuffle last year, how can you be so sure?

      2
      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        4 months ago

        stel – Speaking just for myself, my position is at least ONE OF Grissom, Campbell and Mayer should be able to play middle infield fulltime with the Red Sox. That’s why I don’t feel the need to sign Bregman. And worse comes to worse, Story/Rafaela covers middle infield.

        Trust me, I’m not usually one to be against signing big names.

        2
        Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          By the averages just 1 of 5 top prospects like those will turn out to be a MLB average player. Just one. Red Sox fans are acting like all 3 of those you mentioned will be All Stars like Bregman. An average MLB player is what Rafaela has turned out to be. An average MLB player is what Casas has turned out to be. Temper your enthusiasm with a little reality. Not all or even most of the Red Sox top prospects will turn out to be average, let alone an All Star level player like Bregman.

          Reply
        • ffrhb14Sox

          4 months ago

          A little early to declare what Rafaela or Casas will be. Bergman isn’t a need, why overpay for him instead of taking a chance on the young guys and keeping money open for actual needs?

          1
          Reply
      • stymeedone

        4 months ago

        I thought Moncada was a pretty good example as well. Prospects are a hope.

        1
        Reply
      • letitbelowenstein

        4 months ago

        Grissom = Bob Heise or Stan Papi. One of Boston’s worst trades ever.

        Reply
      • jackbee

        4 months ago

        Grissom is a lost cause for consistant MLB play on offence – very poor – and defence – adequate at best. Despie great AAAv in 2023, Campbell may flame out in 1st month MLB Red Sox and would be sent back to AAA. Good point steldar how Jackson flamed out with Orioles after call up .189 BA in 60 games.

        Give Bregman his 4 years Red Sox WITH 4TH YEAR TEAM OPTION. He will rake offensively with Green Monster, play 2nd base and take AB’s vs. LH stasrting piyching over Yoshida.

        Also in what MLB world id 12 errors in 1138 inninings in 2024 makes Devers a poor fielder so shake your head to clear cobwebs and see how solid Devers is defensively. Bregman just 10 errors at same position as Devers and won 1st Golden Glove in 2024.

        Bregnan 2B and DH for a few years and much needed RH bat in lineuo perfect fix for Red Sox. – go get A.B.

        1
        Reply
        • wwfinn

          4 months ago

          While Devers has shown some occasional ability to turn a nice play defensively it’s baseless to call him solid. He averages 17 errors per season – 19 as recently as 2023 – with a .944 career fielding percentage. That currently ranks 201 among career third basemen. Even Bill Madlock was a better defender and he at least won some batting titles. Bregman is far and away the better defender. If the Sox sign him (which I doubt) and they’re serious about improving defensively then he will play 3rd and Devers will DH – because they’re paying him for his bat, not his glove.

          Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 months ago

        No one in history has ever said that every prospect is a lock to succeed. Of course they could fail. You know who else could fail? Bregman.

        The worst mistakes in BB are always the ones that assume players don’t age.

        3
        Reply
    • Pads Fans

      4 months ago

      Devers would have had a higher WAR, the value he provides for the team in terms of contributing to wins, at DH than at 3B in 2024. Same goes for 2023 and 2022.

      Bregman is better than Devers. Even in a down year for him Bregman was 10% better than Devers.

      Bregman will be cheaper than Devers.

      If Devers stays at 3B and Yoshida is on the team at all clogging up the roster, the Red Sox can count on playing 3rd fiddle in the East.

      Reply
  19. thedappergent

    4 months ago

    Resigning with Houston pays off much bigger dividends in the long run, especially if the known high-water offer is still on the table. Outside of Houston, he still has to deal with the stigma of the sign-stealing, he’s still a very good player overall while not elite, and frankly, it’s a “what have you done for me lately?” business – his 2018-19 seasons don’t count.

    Nominally he has as good of a chance as anyone to produce at high level in his decline phase. If he’s still performing in years 4, 5, 6, the Stros will extend him generously.

    He gets to stay a bigger part of the Golden Era than Correa and Springer even though they were better players overall.

    Reply
  20. swanhenge

    4 months ago

    Ok, so if Boston is maxed at 4 years, who are the FIVE other teams w 5 year offers? Such bs reporting.

    And besides that point, I think 4 years is about right for Bregman. He should sign.

    2
    Reply
  21. cpdpoet

    4 months ago

    As an (AL) Redsox fan from the ’70’s Fisk/Burelson/Remy/Lynn/Scott days…and well …Yaz….

    Would a 4 / 120 deal work? Caveat, asking as a Phillies fan…but went to Ted Williams baseball camp in Lakeville Mass for 4 summers.

    Reply
    • KingKen

      4 months ago

      $30M per year seems a bit high for what Bregman brings to the table. His current team who knows him best doesn’t even value him at that price, given their 6/$156 offer.

      1
      Reply
      • cpdpoet

        4 months ago

        Sure I get that, but his expectations outpaced the market I guess.
        Would a Redsox fan be ok w/ a 4/120 is my Q…

        As a Phillies fan w/ Bohm (2yrs) and Miller in the pipeline I’d say no.

        1
        Reply
    • Pads Fans

      4 months ago

      If he repeated 2024, what is considered a down season for him, in 2025 and then began the 7% decline per season that is typical of players after their age 31 season Bregman would provide $133 million in value to the team that signed him to that 4/120 deal.

      For the Red Sox you would add in the additional value of being able to move Devers off 3B and you should be able to add another $10-12 million to that value of signing Bregman.

      1
      Reply
  22. EnriqueRomo

    4 months ago

    Bregman with the Sawks make that lineup wicked hahd.

    1
    Reply
  23. Bosox2013

    4 months ago

    I personally don’t think Bregman makes sense in the long term but his Fenway numbers are incredible and his clubhouse presence would probably help a young team moving forward. That said they should just pony up the dough. 4 years/152 million with 2 additional performance based vesting options.

    Reply
    • KingKen

      4 months ago

      $38M per year for Bregman? You’re nuts.

      8
      Reply
  24. t0bIe1CaN0bI

    4 months ago

    I’d love to see a pie chart featuring the following slices:
    1) ego
    2) boras
    3) what he secretly thinks he’s worth

    5
    Reply
  25. RobblyDobs

    4 months ago

    If the Sox want a short term 3B they should trade for Arenado. Why spend 4/120 on very good when you can get good for 3/50 and a 10-15 prospect, in all probability (as the Cards and Arenado get increasingly keen to deal)?

    Win-win.

    3
    Reply
    • Pads Fans

      4 months ago

      Moving Devers to DH would improve their WAR total by a win or more over the 2 seasons left on Arenado’s deal.

      Then add the 4-5 WAR total Arenado would bring for those two seasons and now the Red Sox are up 5-6 wins without any difference in performance by those two players.

      They would be losing 2.8 WAR over those two seasons from not playing Yoshida, but that is replaceable far more easily. Trade Yoshida + half his remaining salary so they get something in return and then play some of those young guys like Anthony in the OF instead.

      Reply
  26. I Want to Believe

    4 months ago

    As a Tigers fan, part of me wants to see Boston sign Bregman so that Detroit isn’t stuck with him for 7 years. Bregman would definitely make Detroit better, but Matt Vierling is fairly competent at 3B and he costs league minimum. It seems doubtful that Chris Illitch is going to dip into the Little Caesars fund, so Scott Harris has to pick his spots or risk handicapping the roster long term. Even tho Detroit can definitely afford Bregman right now, he’s probably not the ideal basket to throw all your eggs in.

    4
    Reply
    • LouWhitakerHOF

      4 months ago

      The Tigers have one of the lower payrolls in baseball. I don’t think they would be dipping into the Little Caesar’s Fund. Their attendance was really good and with the payroll on the low end they are still doing really well. Bregman hits around .260 with low 20s homers. I think those numbers drop a bit at Comerica. I would not overpay for the guy as he enters his mid 30s years. Great comment about Matt Veirling.

      Reply
      • stymeedone

        4 months ago

        Given the current roster, Kreidler is probably their best defensive 3B, but the bat is a huge question mark. Its looking like a Vierling/Jung platoon, but again, the defense is only so-so. Both would be better fits at other positions. Vierling is an incredible OF, so playing him at 3B isn’t maximizing his value. Jung just adds one too many LH hitters to the lineup to be a full time option. To think that a few years ago the Tigers lacked LH bats. If Guerrero and Devers can get by at 3B, maybe giving Torkelson another shot couldn’t hurt. I’d take his 2023 numbers all day.

        Reply
  27. kodion

    4 months ago

    I wonder how much the advice to slow-play this is costing/going to cost Bregman?

    Reply
  28. dajuba

    4 months ago

    Bregman will sign with the Red Sox for 3yrs $90m with a $10m signing bonus, opt outs after year 1 & 2 and open the season as the 2B.

    Reply
    • Poolhalljunkies

      4 months ago

      No he wont..allowing a player with a draft pick attached to opt out after 1 year is a terrible deal for any team signing him

      6
      Reply
  29. Thec’s

    4 months ago

    Let’s face it, the Sox are being cheap again! John Henry has got to sell the team to a full time owner! Don’t believe the hype and quit buying the tickets!

    2
    Reply
    • Poolhalljunkies

      4 months ago

      They are only being cheap if you assume they need the player…i would argue they are being wise in this case as locking up this guy for 5 or 6 years is a total waste based on his apparent decline…hopefully henry stays the course and isnt swayed by people thinking hes cheap..he didnt become a billionaire by making too many crappy deals..and the sox already have several..no need to compound a problem by giving in to a player you dont need

      4
      Reply
      • Poolhalljunkies

        4 months ago

        Sag…in this case are you suggesting signing bregman to a 5+ year contract exceeding what houston has alledgedly offered is a smart move for this particular sox team? Baseball wise or financially?

        Reply
      • Baseballisthebest

        4 months ago

        Pool, to me the answer is yes to both. One playoff home game is worth nearly as much as Bregman would make in a year so financially it makes sense.

        On the baseball side it improves the team in two ways. #1 Bregman is better that Devers. 4.1 WAR vs 3.7 WAR. #2 Devers would be a more valuable DH than he is a 3B. Bregman at 3B and Devers at DH is 8 WAR or more. Devers at 3B and Yoshida at DH is 5 WAR. That difference alone would have put us in the hunt for the playoffs with KC and the Tigers last season.

        Personally I think the difference is much larger than that after watching Devers not even move to go after balls in play that Bregman or Arenado would have easily turned into outs.

        Reply
      • Poolhalljunkies

        4 months ago

        Base* ..while i understand your point devers is not moving off 3b..its literally in his contract that he will stay at 3b for the next several seasons

        Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      4 months ago

      Thec, won’t happen. The Red Sox are the Fenway Groups cash cow. We pay for all their other toys.

      Reply
  30. retsubllab

    4 months ago

    The Red Sox need another Refsnyder but of the inf/1b/c variety. Start integrating the young guys into the lineup, but on those days when the opponent is starting a left hander, they need a couple RH bats to plug in. Please no band aid Bregman or Alonso signing.

    1
    Reply
    • Ketch

      4 months ago

      Like Sabol?

      Reply
  31. tigerdoc616

    4 months ago

    Bregman isn’t going to get the $2ooM he allegedly is asking. My guess is that both the Tigers and Red Sox have been offering shorter term deals. IF Houston’s offer of 6yrs and $156M is still on the table, then I think he’ll eventually end up signing there. Houston might sweeten the pot a bit and while they will probably deal Pressly to help free up some room, they will have to exceed the CBT this year to do it. But they have plenty of money coming off the books after this season and should be able to dip below the CBT next year. IF I were Scott Harris, I’d be more than willing to help them out. Go get Pressly and Parades (they won’t need him if they do sign Bregman) in exchange for one of their young controllable pitchers not named Jobe.

    Reply
    • LouWhitakerHOF

      4 months ago

      I think if the Astros 6Y deal for $156M was still on the table he would probably be excepting it right now. I don’t believe that he has several 5 and 6 year deals on the table when these ‘interested teams’ are talking about shorter term deals. The original asking price of $200M for a player in his 30s years that will bat around .260 and hit low 20s homers is way too much even if he is a gold glove.

      1
      Reply
    • t0bIe1CaN0bI

      4 months ago

      Or let’s get Flaherty and Alonzo for 2-3 yrs.

      1
      Reply
      • t0bIe1CaN0bI

        4 months ago

        Thank you Saga.. I goofed though. I meant it from a Tigers perspective. My bad.

        Reply
  32. RickEO

    4 months ago

    Everyone think’s Redsox are being cheap. Absolutely not. Smart and wise. Organization haven’t won 20% of world series by fluke. Cmon people. Long contracts hamstring teams. Arenado. Sox are playing chess. They will be dominate next 8 years

    4
    Reply
    • dasit

      4 months ago

      they finished last in 2022, last in 2023 and 3rd in 2024. bloom oversaw a “tank-lite” strategy as directed by ownership. we’ll see if it pays off but those lost seasons were no fun for their fan base

      3
      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 months ago

        .508 over the past 4 seasons with one trip to the ACLS. It’s not as bad as you think.

        2
        Reply
    • Pads Fans

      4 months ago

      3 of the last 5 seasons the Red Sox have been in last place in the East.

      1
      Reply
      • all in the suit that you wear

        4 months ago

        Yes and the 3 last place finishes were under Chaim Bloom who was fired. Breslow took over for Bloom 15 months ago. Time will tell how good he does, but I like what is he is doing so far.

        Reply
        • Pads Fans

          4 months ago

          You like 3rd place and mediocre?

          1
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          I like being fair-minded. Breslow took over a team that finished in last place in 2023. What did you expect in 2024? They should show improvement each year and going from last place to third place is certainly an improvement. Breslow can’t turn a whole organization around in one season.

          Reply
        • dasit

          4 months ago

          bloom did exactly what he was asked to do: rebuild the farm and set the red sox up to succeed at a lower payroll level. bloom was never going to be the guy to see it through because that’s not his skill set but the wave of prospects knocking on the door is a pretty impressive legacy. breslow is a smart guy but he’s not who i would have picked to maximize the coming window. this is the stage where you need a dombrowski-type. nevertheless 2025-2028 could be really fun for red sox fans

          1
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          dasit: Agreed except I think Breslow will do fine. He is emphasizing pitching and they have been drafting well and having good international signings. So, I think the future is bright. Breslow has been pretty disciplined with free agent signings which I like. I think avoiding bad deals is just as important as getting good deals. I don’t think they are set on a lower payroll. I think they will likely spend more as needed when they have a better team when their younger prospects are up on the Sox.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 months ago

          Quite frankly, I think we are in very good position. Our under/over is 85.5, we still have some spending money left, and FG ranks our farm as #3, and most of the current team is fairly young.

          2
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          …and you will probably say they got lucky when they win their next World Series.

          Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          4 months ago

          Dasit, that is exactly right. Bloom did his job and did it well. What we needed instead of Breslow was another Dombrowski that understood that rings are more valuable than prospects. That prospects are most valuable when used as capital spent on players that have proven they can compete at the major league level and who contribute to playoff runs.

          At the $22.7 million dollars per home game that playoff teams made last year between local revenue and their share of national TV revenue plus the playoff shares for participation in the WS, just getting to the WS would pay for most of the Red Sox salaries. That is something the Dodgers understand. Get to the playoffs every year and you have more money to spend on players whether you win the WS or not.

          Reply
    • Fever Pitch Guy

      4 months ago

      Rick – Thanks for the morning laugh!

      Sox won 4 championships by spending big, look it up.

      1
      Reply
  33. The Saber-toothed Superfife

    4 months ago

    Prove it.

    Reply
    • The Saber-toothed Superfife

      4 months ago

      Front offices using one player as an excuse for not pursuing all avenues of success are not good Front offices, like the Dodgers are.
      They are not honest Front offices, like wise Dodgers are.
      The owners of these teams do not treat their fans with love and respect, like the Dodgers do.
      Owners who do this have little to no social consciousness, like the Dodgers do.

      Not buying pizza today. Some poor schmuck franchise owner, struggling to make it….not getting my business today…..
      Thank you sonny and Mrs Billionaire….
      Like you care about any of it……

      Reply
      • The Saber-toothed Superfife

        4 months ago

        The Illiches are lucky Dodgers fans and members the Dodger front offices still buy Hot-n-Readys….. (when not eating sushi)

        Tiger fans have reconsidered….

        Reply
  34. dasit

    4 months ago

    everyone knows he turned down 6/156 from the astros so the trick is to sign a shorter deal and somehow spin it as better

    1
    Reply
  35. B dog 351

    4 months ago

    Don’t want him and he ain’t coming . They are too cheap . So that’s a plus in this situation. I still think they should try for Arenado

    1
    Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      4 months ago

      Because a 2 WAR player is better than a 4 WAR player?

      1
      Reply
      • B dog 351

        4 months ago

        Baseball. You want to lock up Bregman for 6 years at big $? Arenado is 3 years at less $. Don’t they have two middle infield prospects ( Mayer , Campbell) ? They also have story . I am thinking that might create a log jam. Bring him in with Cora and maybe we can get Beltran as a coach. Let’s bang some trash cans again

        Reply
  36. t0bIe1CaN0bI

    4 months ago

    At this point, hearing Bregman’s name is almost as annoying as TSwizz’s. What’s next, he’s going to start showing up at football games? Please sign somewhere Breg.

    Reply
  37. Bevan

    4 months ago

    I still believe the best use of Sox resources is to trade for a closer like Doran, Helsey, or Sanchez, another starting pitcher like Alcantara, Lopez, or Cease, and a catcher who could become better than Wong. The hitting prospects will take care of the rest of the lineup.

    Reply
    • Bevan

      4 months ago

      I hope you are right about Hendricks. Old Hendricks would be great; an injured one not so much. Anthony and Campbell are the only untouchables in my book.

      Reply
  38. The Virus

    4 months ago

    It’s not always about the money and not wanting to pay a player. Sometimes it’s common sense saying we don’t want this player for x amount of years at his age and stats decreasing steadily for the past x seasons.

    Reply
  39. darkhorses2010

    4 months ago

    Bregman for 4/98 is ok for the Sox, and it’s where Breslow/Henry should draw the line.
    No no-trade clause, no pages and pages of incentives.
    Tell him to take it or leave it.

    Reply
  40. whyhayzee

    4 months ago

    It seems like there are some players who actually want to play for the Red Sox. They have an impressive track of success over the past 25 years and right now have a plethora of young talent in the majors and on the way. I feel that the Red Sox are now trying to be diligent with contracts so that they can afford to keep the next group of high level players after losing out on Betts and others. If Bregman wants in on the next powerhouse team, he has to make a compromise in his demands. This team is poised for their next run at excellence. The days of losing the seventh game of the World Series are past, heck, the other team doesn’t even sniff a seventh game anymore. Go Red Sox!

    Reply
    • B dog 351

      4 months ago

      Why: I really like your enthusiasm. This ownership is not keeping any talented guys for any length of time unless they take team friendly deals early on. Besides Devers who else can you remember? They were doing short term with Ortiz .

      1
      Reply
    • Fever Pitch Guy

      4 months ago

      Hayzee – Until the player puts pen to paper by signing a non-overpay contract with the Sox, you should take back your unjustified statement :o)

      1
      Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      4 months ago

      Saga, your first paragraph was on the money and then you went off the rails in the second. Stop when you are ahead.

      Reply
  41. t0bIe1CaN0bI

    4 months ago

    So if Bregman and Boras stick to their plan that means it’s Detroit or Houston and Bostons out. My money’s on Stros.

    1
    Reply
    • Pads Fans

      4 months ago

      There were 3 teams that had made offers of 5 years or more. Boston was not one of them, but are obviously interested in Bregman.

      1
      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        4 months ago

        Pads – Just like they were obviously interested in Monty last year … Until they revealed they never were.

        1
        Reply
  42. Bra Joni

    4 months ago

    I mean, outside of the trashcan years, the dudes pretty mid

    2
    Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      4 months ago

      4 WAR is All Star, not mid. He was better after the 2017 trashcan year so obviously that didn’t help him. I’m not sure if anyone has so succinctly proven their lack of knowledge of baseball as you have in those 11 words.

      1
      Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      4 months ago

      Saga, Arenado is the perfect fit. Just 3 years commitment and still exceptional defense. Get the Cardinals to eat $21 million total and send them a couple of 45-50 FV prospects and that should be a done deal.

      An alternative would be the Sox taking on all of Arenado’s contract and sending Yoshida to the Cardinals. Add a lower level prospects to the deal to square up the value, some from each team.

      There is no way that we should trade Mayer for Arenado. Not unless Helsley or Fedde is coming with Arenado.

      Reply
  43. Pads Fans

    4 months ago

    People need to remember that Bregman is a better player than Devers. Better WAR and higher peak. He is older and was still better in a down season than Devers was last season. Part of that is because Bregman can play good defense.

    Devers playing 3B provided less value to the team than if he had played DH last season. Just the move to DH will increase his WAR and make the Red Sox a better team even if they only add a 3B with the same value as Yoshida has provided the last two seasons. Add someone like Bregman and the Red Sox are 2-3 wins better in 2025 from that one move.

    2
    Reply
  44. R0cketer

    4 months ago

    Offer him a 4-year deal, with a 5th tear team option and a 6th year player option. That way Red Sox get a max 4 year guaranteed, but if he is not slowing down that much, they can give him a boost to try to make up for not giving it guaranteed, whatever his salary was the previous year, add 3 or 5 million to his 4th salary, that way he feels valuable. If he slumps the fourth year, he can use his option to stay and try to stay to rebound, if he has a great fourth year, he can opt-out to try to get another contract with higher per year or whatever. I think this structure protects the Sox and the player both, as long as I explained it right. He gets 4 years, a good increase if he is still producing for the fifth year, and the 6th year is protection for him if he falls off in the 5th to be able to stay for a reduced salary or leave if he is still going strong and wants to test the market. Give him limited trade option, say protected from 8 teams or something.

    Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      4 months ago

      I like the idea of a 4 year deal with options. 4/120 with two vesting/mutual options. Add in some bonuses for awards.

      Reply
  45. Bruin1012

    4 months ago

    There are a few things to think about signing Bregman for potentially 4 or 5 years. What is the plan for this guy really? Are you really going to play him at second and leave the inferior defender at third? Kristian Campbell is coming fast do you really want block his potential best position with a guy he’s likely to better within a couple of years. The last three years Bregman has had pretty big reverse platoon splits.

    If the plan is to bring in Bregman with the ultimate goal of stealthily moving Devers off of third at some point in the season I’m in. If they intend to really play him the full season at second base I don’t think they should spend the money it’s going to take when Boston has patiently waited for its young core to get close and they are close. There is the caveat that Campbell has a lot of versatility so if he hits they will find spots to play him but still second base looks like his long term home and the position that he says he’s most comfortable with and played in college.

    I think the team has improved this offseason and we just don’t know what a lot of these pitchers will look after a full offseason in the Bailey/Willard pitching lab. There’s a really good interview on Sox Prospects with Justin Willard Bostons Director of Pitching. I’m not going to go into everything he talked about but suffice it to say there are a lot of good arms in the minors and they are coming. He had some particularly interesting things to say about Sandlin. He’s also said that a lot of the young arms in the minors are buying into what they need to do to get to the big leagues. It’s a great interview and something any Red Sox fan can get a lot of information about minor league pitching from.

    Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      4 months ago

      Bruin, If Devers is still at 3B on opening day, Breslow should lose his job.

      Willard is talking about guys that could potentially fill the back of the rotation or the bullpen and he makes that pretty clear. There are no frontline starters on the farm.

      Reply
      • Bruin1012

        4 months ago

        Baseball I’m wondering if you listened to that interview at all because Willard didn’t say anything about where he thought the pitchers would land. He certainly didn’t make it clear that the guys in the system are mostly back of the rotation or reliever types. That might be your opinion but you didn’t it get that from Willard.

        Reply
        • Bruin1012

          4 months ago

          Once again Saga reading comprehension not a strong suit I see. I commented that I don’t think signing to play second, which seems to be the idea, is a good idea. I don’t think blocking you likely future second baseman is a good idea. It’s not hard to see Campbell being the better and more valuable player very soon probably within a year or two. If the plan is to DH Devers and move Bregman to third then I’m in but doubtful that happens. I did comment on the article, once again reading comprehension KD.

          Reply
      • Bruin1012

        4 months ago

        Campbell is the best 2nd baseman in the organization. It’s pretty much a consensus that his arm is too fringy for the left side of the infield. He’s fast and athletic so he could play in the outfield as well. I know your going to argue with me about it but it comes up time and time again BA, Keith Law, MLB you name it and they think his arm to fringy for short or third. He can play there in a pinch but don’t expect him to land at short or third over the long haul. At this point Story is by far the best shortstop defender for Boston and one of the best defenders at short in baseball he’s the shortstop as long as he stays healthy. He’s a difference maker for Boston defensively when he’s on the field.

        Reply
      • Bruin1012

        4 months ago

        Well Saga it seems ignorance is your forte. You would be hard pressed to find any expert that thinks Campbell can stick on the left side of the infield despite being an excellent athlete. His footwork is choppy and he just doesn’t have the arm for short or third. This isn’t me making this stuff up it’s literally anyone who actually watches him. I’m not sure you can find one expert that says he can stick at short his arm just isn’t strong enough for short. It’s not a knock on him it’s just is what it is. He didn’t even play short in college he played second because his arm isn’t a shortstop arm they knew it even in college. Sox prospects who is probably the most glowing on him defensively but also says that his arm is “passable on the left side of the infield, but best suited for second base”. I’m not sure you can ever comment on a guys defense when you have never watched them play which clearly you haven’t.

        You also seem to have trouble with reading comprehension I clearly stated the caveat that if healthy Story is a difference maker defensively. Any one with any baseball acumen that watches Story play defense at short know he’s a difference maker defensively I guess accept you. He’s a very good defensive shortstop easily better then Campbell defensively and if healthy, which I concede is a big if, goes a long way to shoring up the infield defense.

        I know you don’t put much stock in advanced defensive metrics but you should because literally ever major league team and there brain trust looks at more then just errors they look at advanced statistics to determine defensive viability and Story has outstanding range. I’m really not even sure why we’re arguing about this Story is by far the best defensive shortstop on the Red Sox and most likely at any level including the minors. I’m just not aware of a shortstop in the system that is as good as Story defensively when healthy.

        I know you’re going to get all worked up but you’re a classic case of a guy who can dish it but can’t take it. So you should probably ban me because I won’t stop pointing out your utter lack of understanding and ridiculously silly comments.

        Reply
  46. Rickover50

    4 months ago

    Boras simply has too many clients . Bregman needs to fire him and get a contract done already.. spring training is in a few weeks

    Reply
  47. Baseballisthebest

    4 months ago

    “The Athletic reported the six-year, $156 million offer the Astros made to Bregman earlier this offseason is still on the table,” Alexander wrote. “The Astros are one of at least three teams to have offered Bregman a deal of five years or longer this offseason, four league sources tell KPRC 2 Sports.”

    You can tell no one reads the actual article because the words “at least three” and “or longer” are there. That means it could be 4 or 5 or 6 teams and it could be 6 or 7 or 8 years.

    1
    Reply
  48. MLBTR needs to hire editors

    4 months ago

    When “and” begins the sentence, it shouldn’t have a comma after it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Joc Pederson Suffers Right Hand Fracture

    Recent

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    Diamondbacks Select Kyle Backhus, Designate Aramis Garcia

    Athletics Acquire Austin Wynns

    Julio Rodriguez Helped Off Field Following Apparent Injury

    Astros Designate Forrest Whitley For Assignment

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Rays Promote Ian Seymour

    Angels Notes: Soler, Trout, Stephenson

    Mets Sign Julian Merryweather To Minor League Deal

    Brian Snitker Discusses Raisel Iglesias, Closer Role

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version