The World Series looms and the offseason will begin around two weeks from now. One of the first key decisions for teams is whether to issue a qualifying offer to any of their impending free agents. Clubs have until the fifth day after the conclusion of the World Series to make QO decisions.
The QO is a one-year offer calculated by averaging the 125 highest salaries in MLB. This year’s price is $22.025MM. Players who receive the QO have around two weeks to get an early feel for the market before deciding whether to accept. If they do, they cannot be traded without their consent until at least June 15 of the following season — as is the case for any MLB free agent who signs a major league deal.
If the player rejects and signs elsewhere, his former team would receive draft compensation. The signing club would forfeit a pick (or picks) and potentially international signing bonus space. The compensation and penalties vary depending on teams’ revenue sharing and luxury tax statuses. MLBTR’s Mark Polishuk recently examined what each team would receive if they lose a qualified free agent, and the penalties they’d pay to sign one.
Yesterday, MLBTR looked at a relatively light class of expected recipients on the position player side. There’s more intrigue with the pitching, which could feature a handful of borderline cases depending on option decisions and health questions.
No-Doubters
- Dylan Cease (Padres)
- Edwin Díaz (Mets)
- Ranger Suárez (Phillies)
- Framber Valdez (Astros)
This group is straightforward. Valdez and Suárez should easily land nine-figure contracts. Cease will probably begin the offseason with a nine-figure ask of his own based on his durability, plus stuff, and excellent strikeout potential. His 4.55 ERA and general inefficiency in the second half might prevent him from cashing in to that level, but he’d at least be able to command a two- or three-year deal with opt-outs even if his market doesn’t materialize as hoped. There’s no reason for him to accept a one-year deal.
Díaz is expected to opt out of the remaining two years and $38MM on his contract. He wouldn’t do that only to accept a one-year offer at $22MM. He’ll decline the qualifying offer and could look for a four-year deal that pays around $20MM annually.
Likely Recipients
- Zac Gallen (Diamondbacks)
- Michael King (Padres)
- Brandon Woodruff (Brewers)
All of these pitchers seem like comfortable recipients as well, though it’s not 100% certain they’d each decline as the top tier would. Gallen had an up-and-down season that concluded with a 4.83 earned run average over 192 innings. His 21.5% strikeout rate was the lowest of his career, and he struggled with the home run ball for the first time in four seasons. It’s not an encouraging walk year, but he’s only 30 years old and is a few months removed from having a case for a $150MM contract. While he’s not going to get there now, he should be able to land a two-year deal with an opt-out if no team is willing to pay nine figures.
King and Woodruff would’ve been locks to reject the QO had they finished the season at full stride. King missed a couple months with a pesky nerve injury in his throwing shoulder, then lost a few weeks to a knee issue. He returned in the middle of September but didn’t make it beyond five innings in any of his final four starts. The Padres carried him on the playoff roster but had pushed him far enough down the depth chart that they turned to a diminished Yu Darvish to start an elimination game while keeping King in the bullpen. It’s still likely that he’ll decline the qualifying offer and command a multi-year deal, but it’s an uphill battle to the nine-figure money that once seemed to be in the cards.
Woodruff finished the season on the injured list with a lat strain. He’d missed all of 2024 and the first half of this past season rehabbing from a shoulder surgery. In between, he was one of the best pitchers on the planet. He turned in a 3.20 ERA with a 32% strikeout rate across 12 starts. Teams are always on the hunt for playoff-caliber starters, and Woodruff certainly has that kind of ceiling. The durability questions and his age (33 in February) are likely to keep him at two or three years, but he should command a multi-year contract that pays at or above the qualifying offer price.
Borderline Calls
- Jack Flaherty (Tigers)
Flaherty has a $20MM player option. He’ll only become a free agent if he believes he’s going to beat that on the open market. Would he decline the option just to accept a qualifying offer for an extra $2MM if the Tigers offered it? That seems unlikely but isn’t impossible. He’d have the approximate two-week window after receiving the QO to gauge the market, and if he’s not finding the kind of early interest he’d hope, it could make sense to accept the offer.
The Tigers would need to decide whether it’s worthwhile to take that chance. Flaherty is coming off a middling 4.64 ERA but took the ball 31 times and struck out 27.6% of opponents. There are some similarities to where Nick Pivetta was at this time last year: a reliable source of innings with a plus strikeout/walk profile but concerns about his home run tendency. It was a little surprising that the Red Sox made Pivetta a qualifying offer and even more so that he turned it down. That gamble ended up netting the Sox the #75 pick in the draft. The Tigers, as revenue sharing recipients, would get a pick after the first round if Flaherty declines a QO and still pulls a $50MM+ guarantee from another team (as Pivetta did).
- Lucas Giolito (Red Sox)
Giolito lost the 2024 season to internal brace surgery. He began this year on the injured list after suffering a Spring Training hamstring strain. He posted an ERA near 5.00 in May before settling in as a productive mid-rotation arm over the next few months. Giolito turned in a 3.03 earned run average across 20 starts and 113 innings from June onward.
A sub-20% strikeout rate raised some doubts about the sustainability of that kind of run prevention. Still, he looked like a reliable third starter who would do well on the open market once he crossed the 140-inning threshold to convert a $14MM team option into a $19MM mutual provision. Luis Severino had a similar profile and commanded three years and $67MM with an opt-out after declining a qualifying offer last winter. While that contract was an overpay to get a free agent starter to pitch at Sutter Health Park, a three-year deal in the mid-$50MM range is still preferable to accepting a QO.
Then came another injury. Giolito suffered flexor irritation and a bone issue in his throwing elbow at the end of the regular season. He did not make the Wild Card roster and would not have been available even if the Red Sox had made a deep postseason run. Giolito told Chris Cotillo of MassLive that there’s no ligament damage and the issue should heal with rest. Whether to make the QO will come down to Boston’s risk tolerance on the elbow.
The Sox’s luxury tax status should also be a consideration. Unofficial public estimates have them narrowly above the $241MM base threshold. If that’s the case, they’d only get a compensatory pick after the fourth round if Giolito rejects a QO and signs elsewhere. It’d fall in the #75 overall range — like the Pivetta pick — if they had stayed below the tax threshold. That won’t be known publicly until MLB releases its final payroll tallies in December, but the team surely has an idea of where they stand.
- Shota Imanaga (Cubs)
Imanaga has a complex option setup that might keep him from getting to free agency. The Cubs first need to decide whether to exercise a three-year, $57MM option covering the 2026-28 seasons. If they decline, Imanaga has the right to opt out of the remaining two years and $30MM on his deal. If both sides decline their end of the option structure, he’ll be a free agent. The Cubs would then need to decide whether to make the qualifying offer or be content to let Imanaga walk.
The longstanding assumption has been that the team would exercise the three-year option. Imanaga was fantastic in 2024 and carried a 3.08 ERA over 20 starts through the end of August this season. Then he got torched in September (6.51 ERA) and gave up six runs over 6 2/3 innings during two postseason starts. He gave up at least one home run in each of his last nine regular season starts, as well as in both playoff outings. Imanaga surrendered an MLB-worst 20 longballs in the second half.
That’s likely to continue to be a problem. Imanaga’s fastball sits around 90 MPH and he’s an extreme fly-ball pitcher. After striking out more than a quarter of batters faced during his rookie season, that dropped to a slightly below-average 20.6% mark this year. There are a lot of red flags, but he also owns a 3.28 ERA over 318 MLB innings in the last two seasons. How much has the final six weeks soured the Cubs on his future projection?
Unlikely/Long Shots
- Brad Keller (Cubs)
- Tyler Mahle (Rangers)
- Robert Suarez (Padres)
- Luke Weaver (Yankees)
- Devin Williams (Yankees)
This group gets a cursory mention largely because there’s often one or two long shot recipients each year. Pivetta and especially Nick Martinez fell into this bucket last winter. Still, it’d register as a major surprise if anyone from this group receives the QO.
Suarez probably has the best chance. He’s one of the game’s best closers and should command a strong two-year deal for his age 35-36 seasons. The Padres have been navigating short-term payroll questions for the past few years, though, and they have Mason Miller as an obvious alternative to handle the ninth inning. Even if they want to give Miller a chance to start, Jeremiah Estrada or Adrian Morejon could close. With bigger needs in the rotation and at first base, they should let Suarez walk.
Mahle had a sterling 2.18 ERA across 16 starts but didn’t miss many bats. He then suffered a rotator cuff strain that cost him three months between mid-June and September. He has battled various shoulder injuries over the past two seasons and underwent Tommy John surgery in 2023. The Rangers are cutting payroll and need to overhaul their lineup. Committing $22MM to Mahle wouldn’t make much sense.
Williams, Keller and Weaver are three of the top relievers in the class. Teams generally reserve the QO for established high-end closers (e.g. Josh Hader, Raisel Iglesias). Williams would’ve been in that group if he’d had a typical platform year, but he finishes his first and probably only season in the Bronx with an ERA near-5.00.
Ineligible
- Chris Bassitt
- Shane Bieber
- Raisel Iglesias
- Merrill Kelly
- Zack Littell
- Nick Martinez
- Justin Verlander
Players who have previously received a qualifying offer in their careers cannot be tagged with a second one. That rules out Bassitt, Iglesias, Martinez and Verlander. Teams can only make the offer to players who spent the entire preceding season on their roster. Bieber, Kelly and Littell (who would’ve been unlikely anyway) were all traded at the deadline.

Someone please sign Cease.
Yeah, someone’s going to make a foolish decision and offer Cease way too much money. He is way too volatile year to year for my liking.
If he alternates from being a CY finalist and being a league average type it’s not the worst package considering he’s always providing starts.
Over the past 5 years he’s done the following each year:
*32-33 GS
*214-227 K’s
*65-79 BB’s
*16-21 Hr’s allowed
The big difference is in his great years he’s giving up a .260’s BABIP and in those not great years he’s at .320-.330.
I think he’s going to be a pretty solid signing for a team like the Mets and think there is a chance his deal ends up playing out like the one Zach Wheeler signed with the Phillies that see’s him get better in his 30’s.
That’s a good analysis. Snell would be another good comp. He went:
4.04
1.89
4.29
3.24
4.20
Then between 2.35-3.38 in the last four seasons.
I’m trying to talk my way into thinking that Cease can be the next Snell.
Snell definitely has that same yo-yo thing going, but Cease takes the ball every 5 days where as Snell has only made more than 27 starts/130 IP in 2 of his 10 seasons. Big reason why Cease has racked up 300+ more k’s than Snell these past 5 years:
stathead.com/tiny/k4mwo
Thanks for that. Yeah weird, v consistent FIP.
Red Sox or Dodgers
Isn’t that a lot of pretty good pitchers?
Which ones do you NOT want on your team?
If I’m a team, I’m “taking a chance” on Devin Williams
2019-2024: 39% K, 12% BB, 56 FIP-, 62 xFIP-
2025: 35% K, 10% BB, 62 FIP-, 70 xFIP-
If I’m the Yankees, I’m probably trying to negotiate a multi-year deal (buy low) and making the QO to increase my leverage
I’m not sure he re-signs even with a Q.O. as the Yankees seems committed to Bednar as closer.
But Bednar is only controlled for ‘26.
Some of his money is deferred that’s why
Flaherty isn’t borderline. Detroit has to extend it if he opts out. Him opting out means he’s worth more than 1/$20m anyway, so 1/$22m isn’t that big of a raise. Plus the article admits that him declining the player option only to accept the QO is “unlikely.” You always extend the QO if you think the player accepting it is unlikely.
They were 9-22 in games he started. By all means hes borderline at this point. They might be ready to move on at this point, especially over paying him $22M.
Oh God dude using pitcher wind to try and make your argument? Come on!
Thats not his wins, thats the Tigers record in the games he started. He was 8-15 with a 4.64 ERA and 1.280 WHIP. By no means inspiring.
Teams win total is not necessarily indicative of his performance. He himself had a bad year, but the team was even worse when hhe was on the mound. For a team with a winning record their performance with him on the mound was awful winning only 1 of every 3 games over 31 games.
That’s just pitcher wins and losses with an extra step added in. Not a real stat and has no place in baseball discussion.
Every statistc carries some value. Obviously not all stats are equal, but all statistcs have some value.
FYI, if u look at what they call “standings” wins and losses are a real stat and have significant meaning in baseball.
They are a team stat not a player stat. Wins and losses have no value in judging a pitcher and never have.
Bill James and Tommy John say otherwise. Im gonna have to take their word here….
Why the Pitcher’s Win IS an Important Statistic – Yankee.Blue share.google/d2KrKWpSNaUpALf5a
As if I (or anyone for that matter) should care what a bunch of boomer former MLB pitchers think about anything. You probably think Jacob deGrom was “just average” in 2018 LOL.
Im well aware that both of them know a hxll of a lot more than you or I….
Try and deflect and insult others tho. Cracks me up that the ones on here primarily tl antagonize others and/or argue opposed to just talking baseball or the ones who seem to be wrong much more than others.
deGrom was obviously great that year, unfortunately he did not get much run support and had insanely bad luck. I never said or alluded to pitcher wins being the end all be all. I said it has some value and like most stats when seen it calls for looking into other stats to get an idea of what happened. What happened for Flaherty this year is he was off more often than not. So the games he pitched well skewed his already not very good stats to looking a bit better. He also often left games with other teams having built momentum. That momentum swing very often has batters swinging with more confidence which is huge.
Noah Syndergaard and Zack Wheeler had better win percentages than Jacob deGrom for the Mets in 2018. So you think they were better than deGrom that year? Same offense scoring runs for them and same defense playing behind them, right?
AGSIN I said deGrom had a great year and it was an anomaly. I also said that they were not the end all be all. On top of that I did not say that they were more important than any other stat, I merely said they do hold some value as does any statistics ro varying degrees.
No value at all. No correlation with pitching well.
Isn’t Robert Suarez still Arb eligible if he opts out? Or did he negotiate no arbitration into his contract? I think he’s pretty close to being as good as Edwin Diaz.
Yeah when coming from Japan he negotiated out of arb. Also hes good but Diaz is another level both ERA wise and K wise. Nevermind the age difference. Don’t get me wrong I’d take Suarez no question but Diaz is elite elite.
Not arb eligible. He becomes a FA outright.
He only had to beat 2/$38M which is pretty much guaranteed given his sub 2 ERA and dominant K profile. In fact he has a sub 2 in 2/3 of his last 3 healthy seasons and is 4ish years younger than Suarez.
didn’t Diaz already reject a qualifying offer last time he was a free agent?
He re-signed with the Mets before the qualifying offer deadline. Looking at the transactions on his Baseball Reference page, he became a free agent on November 5, 222, and re-signed with the Mets on November 9.
There are several more free agent pitchers who were traded mid-season who are therefore ineligible for the qualifying offer, but I suppose you didn’t want to waste space by listing every single one who had no chance of receiving a QO even if they hadn’t been traded.
Still, you should’ve specified that it’s an incomplete list.
“Qualifying offer decisions”.
No considerations nor decisions to be made for those you’ve specified.
Then you need to specify that you’re not including players who are guaranteed not to receive a QO. Either way, you didn’t specify properly.
Besides, the decision still exists in those cases. It’s just a definite “no.”
Zack Littell had the best season in terms of bWAR (3.2) of all the pitchers but the top tier . Obviously relievers do not rack up WAR like starters.
He would do well in a home park that suppresses some of his tendency to give up home runs.
SF reunion?
Seattle?
Could definitely see him working out in SF or SD.
Yes. And he should. I think Cohen gives him a new contract.
I really hope that the Rangers or Mariners sign Framber Valdez. Dude is the most overrated pitcher of the last 10-15 years. Very glad the Astros will not have him in their rotation in 2026.
Edwin Diaz got me to thinking of Robinson Cano which got me to thinking of Brodie Van Wagenen.
Brodie paid 87 million dollars of Robinson Cano’s contract (for 167 games played with the Mets) plus traded a truckload of players to Seattle for Edwin Diaz and in 2025 it doesn’t look nearly as bad as it did then.
Speaking of Cano, he’s still playing in Mexico. He hit over .400 in 2024 and over .370 in 2025 and he just turned 43.