As the Rays map out their offseason plans, the front office has an area of the roster they’re highlighting as the priority. “The outfield is three spots we’ve got to get right. … I’d probably lean toward the outfield being the area that we’re spending the most time and energy, just trying to make sense of how to best put it together for next year,” president of baseball operations Erik Neander told Mark Feinsand of MLB.com at the GM Meetings (relayed by MLB.com’s Adam Berry).
That’s not to say all three positions will be filled externally. Neander said the club needs to both “(assess) the players we have” while keeping an eye outside the organization for upgrades. They’ve already shuffled the mix in the first two weeks of the offseason. Kameron Misner was traded to Kansas City, while they’ve taken fliers on Ryan Vilade and Jake Fraley. It’s still not a lock that Fraley will be tendered an arbitration contract, which MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz projects to land at $3.6MM.
Tampa Bay has a lot of semi-interesting outfielders but no one locked into an everyday position. Chandler Simpson, Jake Mangum, Jonny DeLuca and Josh Lowe would probably get the majority of the playing time as things stand. Simpson is the sport’s best base stealer and has elite contact skills, but there’s zero power and he probably doesn’t have the defensive feel to play a good center field. Mangum has a similar contact-only offensive profile. He’s a very good base stealer in his own right and a more natural defender than Simpson, but he feels more like a fourth outfielder than a regular.
DeLuca is yet another speed and defense outfielder with minimal power. He has a little more pop than Mangum provides but has a similarly aggressive approach. DeLuca lost most of the ’25 season to right shoulder and left hamstring injuries. Lowe has a typical right field profile and hit 20 homers a couple seasons ago, but he’s coming off a career-worst .220/.283/.366 showing across 435 plate appearances. He’s entering arbitration and projected at $2.9MM.
Richie Palacios, Christopher Morel and Tristan Peters all occupy 40-man roster spots as well. Palacios bounces between second base and the outfield corners. He was limited to 14 MLB games by a knee sprain. Morel has been a disappointment since coming over from the Cubs in the Isaac Paredes trade. He’s a poor defender who has hit .208/.277/.355 in 495 plate appearances with Tampa Bay. He’s projected for a $2.6MM arbitration salary and could be traded or non-tendered. Peters is a 26-year-old rookie with four MLB games under his belt and unspectacular numbers in Triple-A.
The front office needs to decide whether anyone from that group projects as a long-term everyday player. Rays outfielders hit .251/.306/.356 last season overall. They were last in MLB with 35 home runs. It’d be a surprise if they didn’t add someone who can provide more stability via free agency or trade, even if Neander indicated the heavy lifting probably needs to come internally. “You’re banking on the group you have — a little better health, a little more performance, and then maybe it’s supplemented from the outside,” he told Feinsand.
Neander touched upon two other uncertain positions: shortstop and catcher. He told MLB.com that the club will keep an eye on both markets but broadly expressed confidence in the internal options, especially behind the plate. The Rays are well-positioned defensively at both spots but have limited offensive ceilings.
Taylor Walls and Carson Williams are set to compete for the shortstop job. Walls is well established as a plus-plus defender who isn’t going to provide anything at the plate. Williams, 22, is one of the organization’s top prospects. He’s highly regarded defensively and certainly has more power upside than Walls, but it’s an open question whether he’ll make enough contact to be a regular. Williams struck out at an untenable 34% clip in Triple-A this year and fanned in 44 of his first 106 MLB plate appearances. He hit .172 over 32 games and should probably begin next season in the minors.
Neander said they’d look for ways to make that “a little bit stronger competition than we (have) now.” It’s a weak free agent class, though. They’re obviously not signing Bo Bichette or bringing back Ha-Seong Kim. They’re left with mostly glove-first utility types like Walls behind that. There aren’t many obvious trade candidates available either, but it’s possible they’ll look to waivers or minor league free agency to at least bring in another depth piece.
Nick Fortes and Hunter Feduccia are lined up behind the dish. Neander praised Fortes as a defender and expressed confidence there’s more in the tank with Feduccia, who hit .151 in 36 games after being acquired from the Dodgers as part of the three-team Zack Littell deadline deal. The 28-year-old Feduccia is a career .278/.387/.452 Triple-A hitter who never had an opportunity behind Will Smith in Los Angeles. It’s not surprising the Rays aren’t moving off him after two bad months in his first real look against big league pitching.
“If we can find a way to be better at that position, we will, but those are two guys we appreciate. If we roll into next year and that’s where we are — a lot of players, we’re counting on development from where they were, and that certainly applies to those two and [we] think that they can give us more than they did this year,” Neander said. J.T. Realmuto and Victor Caratini are the only real options on the free agent market, assuming they don’t bring Danny Jansen back. Trade candidates include Jonah Heim, Luis Campusano and J.C. Escarra.

A trade involving Harry Ford to the Rays could make a lot of sense.
Not happening. Someone’s gotta catch when Cal has his DH days.
So mostly sit a top prospect? Idk I feel like I’d rather use him as a major trade chip
I think they work out a decent playing time split. Cal isn’t exactly a young kid anymore and he’s caught so many games already, I foresee an increasing amount of DH time for him over the next few years.
He’s a top prospect in all of baseball. He’s ready to play for sure. He’s blocked by an MVP candidate for years to come. And the Mariners are absolutely in win now mode.
This is why trades happen dude. I shouldn’t have to explain this to you.
Yeah I’d be very surprised if Ford is on the Mariners next year. He’s completely wasted as a once a week backup, and way too valuable as a trade chip.
Can he play 1B?
Yes. And if they sign Josh Naylor, then Ford will likely convert.
Hope that happens
With the Rays moving back into the Trop expect Caminaro and Diaz’ power numbers to dip. Having a player that can turn a single or a walk into a triple isn’t a bad thing, having multiple guys who can do it is even better.
It’s funny how it’s mentioned that Simpson has zero power but not mentioned that he was second in the league in steals. In the not so distant past guys like Brett Butler, Otis Nixon, Vince Coleman, and even early years Kenny Lofton had little to no power but were every day lead off hitters with blazing speed. That should still hold value today
“That should still hold value today”
Why should it?
All things being equal, a faster player is better than a slower one. Sure.
But a player who gets on base a lot. Or who hits for power. Or who does both. Is better than a player who is fast.
And speed plays better at the bottom of the lineup than the top. A steal attempt in front of a slugger risks getting thrown out for less gain since sluggers can score runners from first. Better to steal in front of a singles hitter. The out isn’t as costly and the steal makes more of a difference between scoring or not.
Juan – I understand you’ll always repeat what the analytics folks preach, but I truly sincerely wish you’d think things out on your own.
First of all, speed doesn’t always equate to baserunning. Some of the better baserunners in MLB are not that fast, they are just intelligent at picking up the best times to run. Christian Vazquez led the Red Sox in stolen bases a few years ago, do you honestly think he was the fastest runner on the team???
Secondly, you are totally ignoring the fact that slow runners at the top of the lineup can clog up the bases and actually prevent runs.
Let’s say you got Schwarber leading off, he’s averaged a fantastic .366 OBP over the last couple seasons. And let’s say it’s 2024 and Duran is batting behind him. Duran, the guy who takes extra bases more than just about anyone. How many times would Duran NOT be able to take the extra base because he has the poor baserunner Schwarber (37 career steals despite almost 5,400 PA’s) in front of him?
There’s a reason why lineups were built with a combination of speed and OBP at the top of lineups for over a century. Despite what the arrogant statistical analysts say today, the thousands of people who have been a part of MLB for the last 150 years were not ALL idiots. They had reasons for how the lineups were put together historically, they didn’t just pull lineups out of their butt.
Your attempted insult is noted
“They had reasons for how the lineups were put together historically, they didn’t just pull lineups out of their butt.”
The way things were done 150 years ago isn’t always the way things should be done now
1) we know more
2) things change
Both apply to this situation
Look at how lineups are constructed now compared to how they used to be.
Should I say that you think ALL of today’s managers are idiots?
There always has to be a balance of balance, of course. The fastest/best base runner shouldn’t lead off if they only get on base 25% of the time. Someone who gets on base 50% of the time should lead off unless they are break-the-scale slow
Speed/base running adds more value in front of singles hitters than power hitters because the value of an extra base is higher.
Juan – I haven’t a clue who you’re trying to portray as a victim, either way your attempt failed. My point stands, MLB has become infested with arrogant stats-obsessed folks who don’t understand the nuances and intricacies of baseball and yet they believe baseball needs to be completely reinvented because they think it’s been done all wrong the last 150 years and they believe they are the ones who can do the reinventing.
Then what you wrote about top of the lineup was identical to what I already said, but you couldn’t bring yourself to officially agree with me. Does it really kill you to agree with someone, let alone acknowledge you were wrong? Apparently so.
Glad to see you now agree Schwarber should not be leading off. Not just because of his lack of speed, but because it’s idiotic for one of the greatest homerun hitters in the game to never have an opportunity to drive in any baserunners in the first PA of every game. Bill James already proved long ago the few extra PA’s he gets batting first instead of third or fourth are not worth the huge decrease in RBI opportunities.
“I haven’t a clue who you’re trying to portray as a victim”
Good. I’m not trying to portray anyone as a victim
Only noting this attempt at an insult
“I understand you’ll always repeat what the analytics folks preach, but I truly sincerely wish you’d think things out on your own”
And this other attempted insult
“Does it really kill you to agree with someone, let alone acknowledge you were wrong? Apparently so.”
What was I wrong about? Be specific.
Have to love the complete lack of self-awareness you display here
“I truly sincerely wish you’d think things out on your own.”
“they believe baseball needs to be completely reinvented because they think it’s been done all wrong the last 150 years”
Which is it? Think for yourself? Or don’t dare to change anything?
“Glad to see you now agree Schwarber should not be leading off. ”
I didn’t say that. Not at all. What did I write that you construed as my having said that?
“Bill James already proved long ago the few extra PA’s he gets batting first instead of third or fourth are not worth the huge decrease in RBI opportunities.”
Citation requested
These requests on my part are pretty important.
If you don’t tell me
1) what I was wrong about. And why
2)what comment of mine you misread as my agreeing that Schwarber shouldn’t be leading off
AND
3) provide support for your statment that James “proved” Schwarber shouldn’t be leading off
OR, admit that none of those things are true, then it’s obvious that you’re not discussing in good faith, and I’ll mute you and forget that you exist.
Also, please address this
“the few extra PA’s he gets batting first instead of third or fourth are not worth the huge decrease in RBI opportunities”
What about the RBI opportunities he creates for other players, like Bryce Harper?
Actually, lineups were mostly built with a combination of singles hitting and speed back in the day. Guys with great speed and low OBPs, like Maury Wills, Omar Moreno, and Vince Coleman, were often thrust into a leadoff role that they didn’t belong in. Then Bill James came along and showed everyone why this was a bad idea. It took many years and more analysts to finally convince the old-school managers and GMs that OBP alone should be the main skill of a leadoff hitter. High OBP guys clogging up the bases is just another myth conjured up by the anti-analytics crowd.
Juan – You have proven to not have a clue as to what an “insult” is.
Stating the truth is not an insult, no different as the labeling “illegal” when indeed the law was broken. You misinterpreting is not my problem.
Show me examples when you’ve agreed with someone by writing you agree with them. Show me examples where you have acknowledged in writing you were wrong. If you can prove I am wrong in this instance, I will happily take back my “apparently so”.
I have given countless compliments to people, and have given thumbs up to many more. You don’t seem to comprehend the concept of good faith discussion.
You denied great baserunners with good OBP skills have value at the top of the lineup. I won’t copy it, you can look for yourself. Rsox began the discussion and you tried to shoot him down.
Wade Boggs had 4,361 PA’s in the leadoff spot. He was not a great baserunner, he stole only 9 bases and got caught 21 times. He did not hit for power, slugging only 34 homeruns. But he had damn good OBP skills, ..413 in the leadoff spot. There’s your proof you don’t need to be a slugger to bat leadoff. The only reason that’s a thing today is because the analytics crowd wrongly believes the few extra PA’s in the leadoff spot have more value than the lost RBI opportunities.
It’s truly sad you don’t even realize when people are trying to help you.
I said YOU should think for yourself instead of lapping up everything the analytics community throws out there.
Change is good only when it’s logical.
So now you are pretending to have amnesia and don’t remember what you wrote, even though it’s still there? You do realize doing so makes you look lazy, right?
“Someone who gets on base 50% of the time should lead off unless they are break-the-scale slow”.
Schwarber has 37 career stolen bases in 5,384 career PA’s. He is break-the-scale slow. as most would expect of a very muscular 229 pound guy who is under six feet tall. There ya go, you agreed with me. Why are you vehemently trying to deny it?
Your threats are meaningless. You hilariously believe I’d be losing out on some kind of enjoyment if you muted me, when in reality reading and responding to your posts have proven to be a colossal waste of time.
I didn’t say James proved Schwarber shouldn’t be leading off, he wasn’t even in the majors when Bill’s article came out. I said Bill proved the additional PA’s gained by moving a top slugger to leadoff are offset by lost RBI opportunities.
You don’t need an elite slugger batting leadoff to create RBI opportunities for the #2 or #3 hitters, I’ve said that numerous times already. Again, look at Wade Boggs for one.
If you can’t handle being proven wrong, then just say so and I’ll mute you so that I don’t respond to your posts anymore. It’s really that simple.
Hank – You have to look at the entire lineup before deciding who should bat leadoff. If there’s absolutely no decent OBP guys in the lineup, it makes sense to throw a speedster at the top. Simultaneously, it’s okay to put a 28-homer guy in the leadoff spot (Rickey) when you’ve got Canseco and McGwire batting 3rd & 4th.
There is no anti-analytics crowd.
There’s only an anti-misused-analytics crowd.
Muted
Fever, of course, didn’t address anything that I said. Only wrote to see themselves write
Didn’t address these things
“1) what I was wrong about. And why
2)what comment of mine you misread as my agreeing that Schwarber shouldn’t be leading off”
Addressed this by denying that they said it
“3) provide support for your statment that James “proved” Schwarber shouldn’t be leading off”
Even though they said this
“I didn’t say James proved Schwarber shouldn’t be leading off”
And this
“Bill James already proved long ago the few extra PA’s he gets batting first instead of third or fourth are not worth the huge decrease in RBI opportunities.”
Of course FPG will likely say some nonsense about James not referring to Schwarber specifically. Ok, then, where is the proof where James showed that it’s true for that player type?
FPG spouts off about “thinking for yourself” and “proving” and “helping” but provides NOTHING to back up what they say. NOTHING. EVER.
Then flat out lies, or misunderstands, about what others have said.
Like
Saying that I agreed that Schwarber shouldn’t be leading off. I said no such thing.
Like this
“You denied great baserunners with good OBP skills have value at the top of the lineup. “.
which I certainly DID NOT say.
This is what I said
“And speed plays better at the bottom of the lineup than the top. A steal attempt in front of a slugger risks getting thrown out for less gain since sluggers can score runners from first. Better to steal in front of a singles hitter. The out isn’t as costly and the steal makes more of a difference between scoring or not.”
Maybe FPV simply misread what I said. Maybe they aren’t intellectually capable of understanding it. Maybe they are just a troll.
And this bit about Boggs. Just what?
“You don’t need an elite slugger batting leadoff to create RBI opportunities for the #2 or #3 hitters, I’ve said that numerous times already. Again, look at Wade Boggs for one.”.
Trying to argue against my point about speed not being that important at the top of the lineup
(Again, here’s what I said
“And speed plays better at the bottom of the lineup than the top. A steal attempt in front of a slugger risks getting thrown out for less gain since sluggers can score runners from first. Better to steal in front of a singles hitter. The out isn’t as costly and the steal makes more of a difference between scoring or not.”
Nothing about sluggers leading off. Only that speed at the top isn’t as important as speed at the bottom)
by pointing out that Wade Boggs was a great leadoff hitter?
Total fail.
I’d look forward to FPG admitting they were wrong, but they’ve proven not to be someone worth spending my time thinking about any more than I have
Muted
Juan – I can see why you’re so disliked and ignored on this site. You’re muted, enjoy finding someone else to waste their time on you.
If that speed made him a an elite CFer no one would care about the power. He hasn’t nailed the defense part yet.
Straight up trade: Roman Anthony for Simpson. As the internet scout, Poe, applying his law, emphatically pointed out: Anthony is overvalued. Simpson would be a steal.
Rays won’t pay Anthony’s salary. It totals 130 million. Chandler Simpson for Roman Anthony is a trade that skews verrrrrrrrrry much to the Rays. Chandler Simpson isn’t as good long term.
Astros – The Rays gave Wander $182M guaranteed, most of which they will never have to actually pay.
Without question they’d happily pick up Roman’s contract.
Without question the Red Sox would quickly decline.
Butler was great at getting on base and Lofton was a tremendous all-around player. Otis Nixon was a great defensive outfielder. Those guys you mentioned were much better players than Simpson has shown himself to be so far.
I feel like it may have been a tough childhood with that last name
Erik had to learn analytics so that he would not be called a Neanderthal
Yes, but they didn’t completely pile on by naming him Thal instead of Erik.
Give the SS to Williams, and let the hitters with the 3 best batting average out of the outfielders start. Have a feeling it’s going to be Lowe, and who knows which is going to be worse out of the other 3. You almost have to keep Simpson because of his wheels.
For Catcher, just go ahead and trade Yandy to St. Louis for whichever catcher they want to give up, and let them start and have Fortes backup. Maybe let Morel or Caminero take reps at 1b or see if one of the extra outfielders can cut it. Won’t be too long until Xavier Isaac is ready.
Did you read the article? Catcher is the position they’re least likely to focus on. Hunter Feduccia was a better prospect than any of the Cards guys except Herrera, who is their starter and one of their best players.
They have Aranda to take over for 1st base. He’s good when he’s healthy. The biggest problem is the depth at SS and 2nd and BP. Catcher is an annoying issue for sure but I don’t trust the current Rays group to find a productive catcher.
Victor Caratini
(Bidding war with Houston)
Karen – You say you’re a Rays fan, so I’m going to assume this post is mostly sarcasm. Good one!
I’m a Rays fan, and I feel like Josh Lowe is a decent outfielder who needs to stay healthy. I’m darn sick of them starting Walls at SS and while Williams has a K problem, most of the hitters in MLB do, and he could offer a better bat than Walls and I believe he will win more games with his bat than Walls does with his glove. There is a reason the ‘90’s Braves started Blauser over Belliard.
I hope they can deal with a team like the Cardinals or White Sox who have a gloat of good hitting catchers.
I feel like many of these Rays guys can play multiple positions, so the guys can be interchanged a little. Have them do whatever it takes to get the best hitting lineup out there every night without completely trashing the defense.
I know the front office is going to start Walls, either start Fortes or sign some guy on their way out of the league to start at Catcher like Eric Haase to start, and will probably hide Simpson in the minors and play an average DeLuca, and keep Brandon Lowe until he either breaks his back or is in a famous could streak at the plate. Pepiot will start to have a breakout season and then need Tommy John. I’m used to it. Just wish the new owners would do one or two things I mentioned to hopefully help them advance further in the playoffs than the first round. Too many times they have stayed pat after reaching the 2nd round (and the World Series in 2020), but they didn’t spend to keep good pieces and didn’t replace them adequately. The team will draw fans if they hold on to good players, win, and put the new park in a more central location.
Well, if the Rays do what you proposed, the outfielders they would play (because they have the best batting average) might be Deluca, Palacios, Mangum or Simpson before Josh. The problem with the batting average approach is the lack of power. I doubt any of those 4 can hit even 10 HRs in a season. So if Josh doesn’t make the team, and he might not based on the past 2 years, the Rays have to bring in someone who hits for power.
Williams might start at SS or be the backup (I can’t fault your logic there), but he’s not ready. I don’t know why the Rays started his clock last year but he should have spent all of 2025 in the minors and stayed there until the Super2 deadline passed next year (assuming he looked ready). Why they traded Caballero, a relatively decent backup SS, is beyond me.
Your plan to play Morel and Caminero at 1B is the real problem… Morel sucks and needs to be nontendered. Caminero really picked up his defensive game as the season went on and should be a fixture at 3B for years. The Rays would be foolish to move him off 3B at this point. Plus, the Rays have Aranda, uber defense first 1B prospect T.Morgan ready for promotion, and can’t play 2B in the field anymore B.Lowe all available for 1B/DH if they trade Yandy. .
Let the hitters with the 3 best batting averages start? Yeah, that’s how they’ll decide it
And let the 3 best batting averages start what is this 1982???
What would you suggest? The worst 3 hitters be the starting outfielders? You already have zero power with those guys other than Mangum, so unless Lowe breaks out into a 30-30 guy, you have 3 out of 4 guys competing for a starting outfielders spot with no power. So no power, low average. What other criteria would you use to determine which one would start? Highest launch angle? You SABRMetric idiots need to go watch soccer or something that drops to your intelligence level. Batting average is a good measure of how many times a player will get on base as long as the sample size is decent.
How mad does it make you that I can teach someone who has never even seen baseball everything I know about analytics and have them and you apply for a job in baseball abd the person I taught in one day would get a job over you? How does that make you feel?
Might get the job, but won’t win a ring with the team.
So I can assume you work in baseball with all of your game-spitting? Which team? Rockies? White Sox? Pirates?
This year is turning out to be a depressing one for fans. A depleted and unimpressed (or unprepared) farm. Walls STILL on the active roster and will surely hit around .210 as is the status quo. Williams has a lot of potential but needs to cut down on strikeouts. The OF… Does need improvement, but I don’t think guys like Vilade or Fraley are any better than what they put out last year, and I don’t foresee the Rays spending any significant money this year to drastically improve the team (and there aren’t a ton of interesting OF FAs this year either). Brandon Lowe is streaky and injury-prone and I’m worried about depth at 2B. A healthy Aranda should help the hitting but there seems too many holes to fix this year to be a real competitor.
I do expect the pitching to slightly improve after moving back to the Trop but I don’t know if the offense can sustain and kind of success hitting there.
The Rays last really good catcher was dArnaud (bur he was only around for a few months). Before that it was Navarro! It’s been a minute.
Walls can go suck a lemon and J Lowe can go with him.
The Rays will almost certainly bring in a RHB to play outfield, whether as an everyday starter or as a platoon option. Morel has nontender written all over him. Same with Fraley and Pereira and Vilade and maybe even Peters. J.Lowe will be the most interesting decision of the offseason. Two bad years, but it’s hard to forget how good he was in 2023. Deluca is the odds on favorite to start at CF, and Mangum and Simpson should both get lots of playing time unless traded. Palacios could be moved to 2B if B.Lowe is traded. Otherwise, I suspect he gets traded if Mangum and Simpson both return because they’re all lefty dominant bats (Mangum is a SH). So at the end of the day, the outfield is likely to be Deluca, a RHB acquired via trade or free agency and 3 of Mangum, Simpson, J.Lowe and Palacios. I can’t see it playing out any other way.
Catchers will be Fortes and Feduccia, with Keegan and Driscoll knocking on the door in Durham. I’m not against the Rays trading for a St. Louis catcher, or Seattle’s Ford, but folks have to remember that the Rays are perennially looking for catching help because they HATE young catchers and defensively challenged catchers. I just can’t see them trading for an unproven catching prospect with a lot of trade value.
SS … god, I have no idea what they’ll do there, except that Walls will most likely start. Williams really ought to start the season in Durham. He wasn’t ready last year and I have no idea why they bothered calling him up in a lost season (I want to believe that was Stu’s meddling and not another example of Neander making a bad call).. I suppose it’s possible the Rays roll with T.Gray as backup SS, though he’s pretty awful in the field. Once again, I don’t understand why they traded Caballero to the Yankees last year, particularly with the pathetic return they received factored in.
I keep forgetting about Feduccia. He could be a decent starter that holds the fort until Keegan hopefully gets called up later this year.
I feel like as much as it hurts, you have to go at least half a season more with Morel, as he and Bigge are basically the only thing they got for Paredes.
No clue of what to do at short if you don’t start Williams. He could use the seasoning but they let Kim go and that option is gone. I have no idea who the free agent SS crop are, but sign someone who hits better than Walls to. Looking at a list, maybe a 1 year deal on Kiner-Falefa and hope he hits. Hopefully the glut of some of these outfielders and such can return someone decent to replace Walls for this year or help the pitching staff.
Nah… Refusing to admit a mistake was made just makes the mistake all the more damaging. Rays need to move on from Morel. Besides, in a few years we’ll all be saying T.Johnson was the prize of the Paredes trade, not that that trade is salvageable no matter how good Johnson becomes.
Rays have no good options at SS in 2026 and can’t afford one on the open market. It will probably be Williams or Tristan Gray, along with Walls, on Opening Day. I like Williams, I just don’t think he’s ready. Rays have dug this hole and there’s nothing they can do about it now.
If Williams doesn’t have a breakout year, that position will be pretty depressing to watch… Gray and Walls aren’t gonna cut it if they are serious about making the playoffs. But then again, are they serious about it? Maybe new ownership might push them to have a decent first season under new management but I kind of doubt it. Yikes.
Why isn’t there more talk about yandy diaz trade? I’d imagine he’s going to be on the move for a couple reasons, he’s expensive for the rays, his position can be filled aranda, and he’s highly sought by contenders.
Mets, Phillies, marlins, brewers, padres all could use him.
Exactly. Flip him for either a good hitting catcher, or a stopgap SS who will keep Walls from starting until Williams is ready and some pitchers.