Right-hander Tyler Glasnow “has come up in conversations” between the Dodgers and other teams, ESPN’s Alden Gonzalez writes. There isn’t any indication that any sort of trade is close or that Glasnow will be dealt at all, as Gonzalez notes that a trade scenario seems like “a long shot.” However, “the Dodgers would not be opposed to moving” Glasnow, so it would appear the starter isn’t exactly untouchable.
It was almost exactly two years ago that Los Angeles first acquired Glasnow in a major trade with the Rays, while also hammering out a long-term contract extension with the righty. Glasnow had been heading into the final year of his contract with Tampa and was owed a $25MM salary in 2024, and the new extension restructured that money while adding a little over $111.5MM in new money over the 2025-28 seasons. The former All-Star is owed $30MM in each of the 2026 and 2027 seasons, and the Dodgers hold a $30M club option for 2028 that (if declined) becomes a $21,562,500 player option for Glasnow.
The big question at the time of the extension was whether or not Glasnow would manage to stay healthy, as a Tommy John surgery and multiple other injuries had significantly cut into his playing time over his eight previous MLB seasons. Glasnow did deliver a career-best 134 innings for L.A. in 2024, yet he didn’t pitch after August 11 due to tendinitis in his throwing elbow. This year, Glasnow was limited to 90 1/3 regular-season innings, as a bout of shoulder inflammation led to another stint on the 60-day injured list.
When he has been able to pitch, Glasnow (who is entering his age-32 season) has lived up to expectations. He has a 3.37 ERA, 30.9% strikeout rate, and 8.8% walk rate across his 224 1/3 frames of work in 2024-25, and his 1.69 ERA over 21 1/3 postseason innings this fall played a big role in the Dodgers’ second consecutive World Series title.
There isn’t any immediate reason why the Dodgers would feel pressured to move Glasnow, as he is still clearly capable of being an important member of a championship-level rotation. But, L.A. is so loaded with starting pitching that it makes Glasnow just one piece of a star-studded puzzle, and perhaps makes him slightly expendable if the Dodgers want to find room in the rotation for their many young arms. Obviously all this pitching depth has been a prime reason why Los Angeles has still been able to win despite an avalanche of rotation injuries, but the Dodgers might be looking to address the injury problem by dealing away a pitcher that (despite his talent) can’t seem to be relied upon to last a full season.
Moving Glasnow sooner rather than later, therefore, would allow the Dodgers to sell high on the right-hander, even if his contract will naturally limit the list of plausible trade suitors. Not that payroll or the luxury tax are any real concerns for the Dodgers, but getting Glasnow’s contract off the books would provide some savings to the club. Glasnow’s deal is one of the few L.A. mega-contracts that doesn’t include any deferred money, so all of his remaining salary is owed up front.
Rather than just deal Glasnow to reduce their tax bill, Los Angeles is probably more likely to re-allocate any savings from a Glasnow trade towards other needs. The Dodgers could bring in another high-salaried player as part of the trade return, and Gonzalez even speculates that Glasnow could hypothetically be part of a Tarik Skubal trade package. Any number of clubs in need of frontline pitching could be intrigued by Glasnow, if the higher price tags or draft compensation attached to this winter’s top free agent starters have left teams wary.

Still can’t believe only the Mets have been hit with fake IL fines
What makes you to Glasnow has been illegitimately sent to the IL?
I think everyone does it, but the Mets may have been particularly careless about how they did that. Nonetheless I think Glasnow is actually injury prone though. There’s no way they would just let a guys making 30 million miss half the season
I know my brewers do it😂
That’s because the fake IL stints are more a product of conspiracy theories and less based in realities. Are there some? Sure, but not as much as certain fans think.
It’s spree-ish…easy to just use it as a strategy. Do it once and it pays off. Do it again. Baseball has always been about finding an edge. Why we create rules and change them.
Some people like to ignore facts such as teams must submit medical records to MLB related to IL stints.
Facts? What are those?
Dude isn’t worth 30m a year to pitch roughly 100 innings.
Think if he gets moved the dodgers will be paying down that contract.
This is why I can’t see him being traded. The Dodgers are the perfect fit for him. They have enough pitching depth and money that they can afford for him to be hurt, as long as he’s healthy for the playoffs.
MLB would be different, if players had to active set number of days during season to qualify for spot on a playoff roster. I wish all big 4 leagues had such a roster rule.
dlj
Who does this benefit? What problem does it solve?
The NBA model of the rule will prevent players from winning end of season awards, if they miss too many games. Then NBA teams have a reputation for just sitting players whenever they want to sit them. MLB teams just send a player down or place them on IL for minor injury to free up roster spot. I’d say a benefit is teams can’t stash a player away during season and then use them for playoffs only in all of the sports leagues.
“The NBA model of the rule will prevent players from winning end of season awards, if they miss too many games”
Seems 100% unnecessary
The more games you miss, the harder to win awards.
“I’d say a benefit is teams can’t stash a player away during season and then use them for playoffs”
So, your “benefit” is that players would be more likely to be injured?
I’m also a skeptic when it comes to how teams use IL placements in all the sports and how roster’s can be manipulated by certain teams. It is nice to know that the leagues probably do monitor this sort of thing but sometimes they don’t catch a team until it is too late.
Sure
But
If established players were being sent to the IL when they weren’t injured, they could complain about it. They’ve signed their contracts.
Players still under team control might be less willing to make an issue of it for fear of risking future employment. And they go on the IL, though, they are getting MLB pay and gaining service time, which benefits them.
I just don’t think it’s that big of a deal.
Simm
Per FanGraphs, he was worth $31 million in 2024
And 13 million in 2025
That, though, doesn’t count any playoff performance – which added to his value this season
He has a long history of not pitching very many innings. If he would have backed up 134 innings in 24’ with that or more in 25’ then sure he could be worth it.
Instead it went back down to 90 innings.
I don’t think they can find a single team to risk 30m the next two seasons with his injury history. He will be a dodger next season barring them paying down a significant amount of his contract.
Are the Dodgers clearing the decks for Skubal?
One can only hope.
Everyone needs to go to the Dodgers.
It’s really healthy for the league. Im sure that Tigers fans who finally had something to cheer for last season would absolutely love to see that happen.
Goku …on behalf of Tigers fans we would HATE to see him go to the Dodgers!
There was a Skubal package floated with Glasnow, Sheehan and Hope. It was intriguing because it would keep the rotation at least close to the production from last year. Two controlled pitchers softens the blow of Mize and Flaherty becoming free agents (and Skubal would be too). They would still have Glasnow, Sheehan, Melton, Olson and Jobe back full time from injury. That is a pretty strong rotation.
The Tigers need help on offence as well though and, unless they go sign a big bat, I think they would want someone closer to MLB back as part of the package for Skubal.
The Glasnow/Sheehan package is intriguing as a starting point but I still think Detroit keeps Skubal.
@Motor I think three years of Glasnow plus Sheehan and Hope might be too much. I can see Glasnow, Hope, and another prospect. Or just Glasnow and Sheehan and some cash for Tyler’s contract.
Hey Sal…the Tigers ask for Skubal seems to be so big that I dont think anyone will meet it unless they get desperate. The Dodgers certainly are not desperate…unless they want to block a competitor? The Mets are a team I could see becoming desperate if they dont add the pieces they need. I don’t think any team will pat Detroit’s price. I don’t blame Harris and Greenberg for listening though.
Motor, I think it depends on if LA also wants to get away from Glasnow which if his name is making the rounds there’s gotta be at least a little smoke. The guy is great when he’s on the field, but that’s the issue.
I do think you’re right in saying that the Mets would be a more desperate team and possibly could offer the most intriguing package.
@Bronx: Could very well be. Dodgers or Mets will have to compete to offer Tigers way more than sane to rent Skubal and hope he/Boras will say yes to 400mil record SP guarantee extension.
I dont think it makes sense to clear Glasnow for Skubal, Glasnow is a solid 2 in my book.
Glasnow as part of a trade to Detroit makes sense if the Tigers like Glasnow at 3/90M which I like compared to Cease at 7/210M.
Detroit can replace their ace whom they dont intend on resigning with a viable ace on a short term deal. They would also likely add a nice return of prospects.
Dodgers get a year of Skubal and salary relief trading Glasnow, opening up a spot for Sasaki in ‘2027. Even if they dont sign Skubal they still have Yamamoto, Ohtani, Snell and Sasaki.
I think its a good trade.
Part of being an ace is being reliable. That’s why Cease got paid (though overpaid in my book).
Glasnow year after year shows he isn’t reliable.
Before 2024, I thought Skubal was injury prone with HOF talent. I feel like Glasnow also has HOF talent but is also way more injury prone or like said above fake IL placement prone.
DLJ, I’m not sure what the benefit would be of a “fake” IL placement for Glasnow. Speaking hypothetically and this is my own opinion, teams wouldn’t be putting their best players on the IL for no reason. Those are the guys you pay to be on the field. Not some middling setup man who is struggling, or a bench player (who can’t be optioned and isn’t hurt) who isn’t performing as well as the guy on a tear in AAA.
Glassarm
Why would the Tigers trade Cy Young Tarik Skubal to replace him with a high salaried, often injured pitcher?
That doesn’t sound like a good return.
Skubal is a free agent after this year and Glasnow is not. Glasnow was only part of a rumored package thst also included Sheehan and Hope.
It’s not. It’s just hopeful Dodgers fans. Tigers aren’t taking Glasnow and money with one or two prospects. Tigers will want controllable players that are ready right now. Tigers are trending up and any package for Scooby is going to require a haul in return. He’s a difference maker.
Sheehan was the Dodgers #5 starter and pitched important innings in the World Series. He’s a very youngest established pitcher, not a prospect. One of the MLBTR writers said in a chat that Sheehan might not be suitable in a trade for Gore because he might be better than Gore.
Glasnow as part of a Tarik package would be intriguing depending on if LA is also sending some money over. 3 seasons of Glasnow, cash, and a prospect or two for a year Skubal? Could work?
The Tigers have room to take on salary and I would imagine if they offered the right prospects or young MLB players it would interest Detroit. Glasnow and Sheehan are controlled beyond this season which keeps them competitive this year and prospects help for sustained competitiveness. I still dont think they will do it though.
Why wouldn’t Tigers not just give 33-38M per season at least to Tarik instead of an already injured pitcher who is being paid 32M per season for low amount of starts
The $450 million contract i keep seeing thrown around just seems like a fantasy. Skubal is awesome but that level of contract would blow away anything by a significant margin that has been given out recently. I hope they just pony up and give him a higher contract than Yamamoto this season and Skubal tells Biras to piss off and takes it 😉
Skubal is looking at a 8-10 year deal with 40+AAV per year next year. And he’s about to enter his 30’s. And it wouldn’t just be glasnow in the deal
Starts with what would any team even pay glasnow right now to pitching maybe 100 innings.
Perhaps 20m? So the dodgers have to include around 20m total for the next two years just to be able to move him for a very light return.
So now the Dodgers have to then come up with the value of Skubal on the trade market.
They could add more money for taking glasnow. Then prospects or current mlb players. Sheehan would likely be the starting spot. Then add in some minor leaguers to get the deal done.
Tigers likely only trade him for an overpay so keep that in mind. Including glasnow just makes trading for Skubal more complicated. Dodgers may just trade him in a separate deal, pending on how the tigers value glasnow.
If the Tigers aren’t going to pay him and he is going to get paid a $#!+ton, possibly indeed in 400mil range, then they absolutely need to cash out and cash out big to whomever that may be.
The tigers are unlikely to pay him, that we agree on.
I’m in the camp they should cash him in now. I actually think there is a decent chance they do.
The tigers have also made the playoffs the last two years and with Skubal have a shot to make the playoffs next year. Then you add in the fans being upset they traded him. These things do matter when it comes to trading him.
Hence why they are only going to trade him for an overpay. Adding in glasnow to a deal just makes it more complicated because he is over paid.
There are also likely others willing to trade for Skubal though it’s a limited market given the trade cost and likely losing him in free agency. Mets/Yankees/Jays/Red Sox/cubs/dodgers…perhaps the O’s are about the only teams I can see even considering it. Even half of those teams I’d fine highly unlikely but as a free agent he will be on one of those teams in 2027.
No matter who he goes to (if anyone) it’s going to be at a steep price. One most fans may seem unreasonable. If traded though dodgers are the most likely in my eyes.
Was that the same offseason the signed ohtani (700m) and Yamamoto (300m)?
And the Dodgers are covering 87 million of the 90 million he is owed. No team is taking Glanow, straight up. Unless they are taking someone like Anthony Rendon in return
Not worth his salary.
But. Any club acquiring him could try him out in the pen as a closer with his stuff to extend his career by a good decade. Hes 31 and could well pitch to late 30s and see 1 more good pay day if he has good showing in closer role.
Robert Suarez just got 45 mill at 35 across 3 years. So Glasnow could definitely get a 3-5 year deal hitting free agency if he can stay healthy and become an elite closer
I’d be so pissed / hurt being traded from the Dodgers.
Glass elbow glassnow. They want to trade him so they can sign either Michael King, or Imai or Valdez to a large contract
Maybe imai but I don’t see it with the others. Just cause they have a lot of money doesn’t mean they’re dumb with it like the mets
Tigers GM would need to be fired to move a two-time Cy Young for an overpaid injury plagued pitcher who likely will only get you 10-12 games a season for 32M per season
It would not be straight up though. Rumored package have Sheehan and prospects as well.
There are several rumored packages that the Dodgers could be putting together. None sound that great, especially compared to what some other teams (leading with the Mets) could offer.
Glasnow is 32 and has never pitched more than 134 innings in a season. He would require a significant pay-down in salary. Beyond that, the Dodgers prospects, in my humble opinion, are largely overrated. (I tend to believe the Yankees and Dodgers get artificial hype on the top-100 prospect lists.)
Who does this artificial hyping? GMs have much better resources to evaluate talent than we do. They wouldn’t take prospects from NYY and LAD if not and they never have any issue making deals with them. This overhype nonsense comes from opposing fans needing to rationalize why their teams aren’t making these deals with their own ballyhoo’d prospects.
Sal- add in these teams have way more resources to evaluate talent. They aren’t going to some prospect ranking board to see who is better than who.
Plus you have to also add in the amount of resources teams like the Dodgers and Yankees can put into finding talent. They may have some dudes that flameout…so do all teams. They just find more of them in some cases increasing the overall numbers that flameout. That doesn’t mean the percentage of flameouts are any higher.
In my research I could only find 2 instances in the last 40 years when a starting pitcher was traded from a club that had just won a World Series Championship. Al Leiter to the Mets in Florida’s Post-World Series fire sale in ’97/’98 and David Wells (and others) to Toronto for Roger Clemens after the Yankees swept in 1998 (trade made in 1999). One trade was made as part of a fire sale, the other was to upgrade to Roger Clemens. Generally speaking, you’d have to be crazy to trade a frontline starter from a team that just won a Championship.
Dodgers aren’t in a fire sale, of course, and don’t need to retool a loaded farm system, nor do they need to lower their tax burden as highly profitable as they are, so the only way Glasnow, a hometown guy whose only fault is that, even his giant 6’8″ frame can’t handle the stress and strain of his delivery, gets traded, is for an extreme upgrade somewhere and since the Dodgers value starting pitching, I’m guessing he’d go in a Skubal deal above all other deals possible right now.
Thanks for the research. A Clemens type deal for Skubal, with the Dodgers upgrading and the Tigers wanting to maintain some level of competitiveness is the only type of deal I could see for Glasnow. The Dodgers hair-trigger (to be charitable) use of the DL means their young pitchers will have opportunities, and they don’t need to save money or restock the farm system. If he’s not needed for an upgrade like Skubal, keeping Glasnow for 90 innings ÷ playoffs is his best use.
Glasnow in a trade for Skubal…now THAT is what would be bad for baseball. Clueless organizations that overrate a guy like Glasnow who has never shown he can stay healthy, enough to trade the reigning two time Cy young winner for him. Why would the dodgers give them much more than him as far as prospects if he’s going to test FA with Boras next year? I think this is a lot more realistic than a lot of writers I’ve seen are putting on
Glasnow to the Mets for McNeil and Senga ( since most Japanese players want to play on the West Coast).
A deal for just Glasnow for say Perez of the Tigers that would provide the Dodgees with OF bat would also need to include at least 2 to 3 of the Dodgers top 10 prospects.. If the Tigers also traded Skubal they should get 3 top propspects of the Tigers choice plus 1 pitcher off of the Dodgers roster. Glasnow is a bad contract.
Skubal talk is all smoke, no fire. Boras prefers free agency to extensions so Skubal would be a one yr rental. Too expensive if we are to believe the supposed return.
Tyler Glasnow and Tommy Edman from LAD to TEX for Corey Seager.
Jordan Westburg and Ryan Mountcastle from BAL to TEX
Kumar Rocker and Jose Corniell from TEX to BAL
Jackson Ferris from LAD to BAL
Let all of these players and their money rot in LA long term, don’t bail them out !!!
This guy is injured EVERY year no thanks
Glasnow is just the kind of SP that David Stearns likes.
Maybe this: Skubal and Greene to the Dodgers. Glasnow and the Dodgers 10 prospects of the Tigers choosing. go to the Tigers. They want Skubal. They want a legit bat. They want to get rid of Glasnow’s bad contract. It just comes at a price.
As a Dodger fan
1) I hope the team doesn’t trade Glasnow
2) I will be THRILLED if the team trades for Skubal
3) I will have mixed emotions if the team includes Glasnow in a Skubal trade
The rumored trade of Glasnow, Sheehan and Hope works out almost perfectly per BTV’S numbers
*Skubal $61
*Sheehan $39
*Hope $33
*Glasnow $-8
*TOTAL $64
Dodgers give up a lot for one season of Skubal (3 years of Glasnow, 4 years of Sheehan and potentially 6 years of Hope).
If the Tigers aren’t going to extend Skubal, getting two starters to plug into their rotation for, likely, less than they would pay Skubal, plus a top 100 prospect is certainly not nothing.
Is it the best deal they could get? Who knows?
Also, Detroit and LA value these players differently than BTV. Dodgers might think it’s a steal for them, while Detroit thinks a steal for them. Or vice versa.
This actually makes sense. Glasnow was healthy in the 2nd half and great in the playoffs, so you might as well try to sell high on him.