Headlines

  • Giants To Sign Harrison Bader
  • Yankees Re-Sign Cody Bellinger
  • Is MLB Parity Possible Without A Salary Cap?
  • Guardians Agree To Extension With Jose Ramirez
  • Yu Darvish Contemplating Retirement, Has Not Made Final Decision
  • White Sox To Sign Seranthony Domínguez
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers Have Discussed Tyler Glasnow In Trade Talks

By Mark Polishuk | December 13, 2025 at 8:20am CDT

Right-hander Tyler Glasnow “has come up in conversations” between the Dodgers and other teams, ESPN’s Alden Gonzalez writes.  There isn’t any indication that any sort of trade is close or that Glasnow will be dealt at all, as Gonzalez notes that a trade scenario seems like “a long shot.”  However, “the Dodgers would not be opposed to moving” Glasnow, so it would appear the starter isn’t exactly untouchable.

It was almost exactly two years ago that Los Angeles first acquired Glasnow in a major trade with the Rays, while also hammering out a long-term contract extension with the righty.  Glasnow had been heading into the final year of his contract with Tampa and was owed a $25MM salary in 2024, and the new extension restructured that money while adding a little over $111.5MM in new money over the 2025-28 seasons.  The former All-Star is owed $30MM in each of the 2026 and 2027 seasons, and the Dodgers hold a $30M club option for 2028 that (if declined) becomes a $21,562,500 player option for Glasnow.

The big question at the time of the extension was whether or not Glasnow would manage to stay healthy, as a Tommy John surgery and multiple other injuries had significantly cut into his playing time over his eight previous MLB seasons.  Glasnow did deliver a career-best 134 innings for L.A. in 2024, yet he didn’t pitch after August 11 due to tendinitis in his throwing elbow.  This year, Glasnow was limited to 90 1/3 regular-season innings, as a bout of shoulder inflammation led to another stint on the 60-day injured list.

When he has been able to pitch, Glasnow (who is entering his age-32 season) has lived up to expectations.  He has a 3.37 ERA, 30.9% strikeout rate, and 8.8% walk rate across his 224 1/3 frames of work in 2024-25, and his 1.69 ERA over 21 1/3 postseason innings this fall played a big role in the Dodgers’ second consecutive World Series title.

There isn’t any immediate reason why the Dodgers would feel pressured to move Glasnow, as he is still clearly capable of being an important member of a championship-level rotation.  But, L.A. is so loaded with starting pitching that it makes Glasnow just one piece of a star-studded puzzle, and perhaps makes him slightly expendable if the Dodgers want to find room in the rotation for their many young arms.  Obviously all this pitching depth has been a prime reason why Los Angeles has still been able to win despite an avalanche of rotation injuries, but the Dodgers might be looking to address the injury problem by dealing away a pitcher that (despite his talent) can’t seem to be relied upon to last a full season.

Moving Glasnow sooner rather than later, therefore, would allow the Dodgers to sell high on the right-hander, even if his contract will naturally limit the list of plausible trade suitors.  Not that payroll or the luxury tax are any real concerns for the Dodgers, but getting Glasnow’s contract off the books would provide some savings to the club.  Glasnow’s deal is one of the few L.A. mega-contracts that doesn’t include any deferred money, so all of his remaining salary is owed up front.

Rather than just deal Glasnow to reduce their tax bill, Los Angeles is probably more likely to re-allocate any savings from a Glasnow trade towards other needs.  The Dodgers could bring in another high-salaried player as part of the trade return, and Gonzalez even speculates that Glasnow could hypothetically be part of a Tarik Skubal trade package.  Any number of clubs in need of frontline pitching could be intrigued by Glasnow, if the higher price tags or draft compensation attached to this winter’s top free agent starters have left teams wary.

Share Repost Send via email

Los Angeles Dodgers Tyler Glasnow

Brewers Open To Trading From Outfield Depth
Main
David Dahl Announces Retirement
View Comments (149)
Post a Comment

149 Comments

  1. ohyeadam

    1 month ago

    Still can’t believe only the Mets have been hit with fake IL fines

    9
    Reply
    • PandaMan

      1 month ago

      What makes you to Glasnow has been illegitimately sent to the IL?

      17
      Reply
    • twopitchmix

      1 month ago

      I think everyone does it, but the Mets may have been particularly careless about how they did that. Nonetheless I think Glasnow is actually injury prone though. There’s no way they would just let a guys making 30 million miss half the season

      13
      Reply
      • Steven hempel

        1 month ago

        I know my brewers do it😂

        2
        Reply
      • Fallguy820

        1 month ago

        Well but the dodgers can do anything they want. They are in bed with the commissioner.

        Reply
        • 14thor

          1 month ago

          Is that why the commissioner allowed the Astros to cheat the Dodgers of the 17 trophy? I mean, piece of metal.
          I don’t like these banksters that run the Dodgers and buy up other teams MVPs while allowing homegrown boys like Seager to walk.

          6
          Reply
        • Citizen1

          1 month ago

          No, Robert’s lost that one. Are you going to imply Toronto cheated to 7 games because it wasn’t a sweep? How about the Brooklyn dodgers. Couldn’t beat the yanks. Hmmm

          Reply
    • Salzilla

      1 month ago

      That’s because the fake IL stints are more a product of conspiracy theories and less based in realities. Are there some? Sure, but not as much as certain fans think.

      4
      Reply
      • Dock_Elvis

        1 month ago

        It’s spree-ish…easy to just use it as a strategy. Do it once and it pays off. Do it again. Baseball has always been about finding an edge. Why we create rules and change them.

        Reply
      • Mr Rickey

        1 month ago

        Some people like to ignore facts such as teams must submit medical records to MLB related to IL stints.

        4
        Reply
        • ElysianPark

          1 month ago

          Facts? What are those?

          2
          Reply
    • amk1920

      1 month ago

      Glasnow didn’t pitch in the 2024 payoffs. Do you think the Dodgers did this just for fun and liked having bullpen games every round? Glasnow is just an injury prone guy

      13
      Reply
    • Zerbs63

      1 month ago

      Yes the Dodgers had him fake his injury during the 2024 second half and playoffs so they could pay him $30 mil to watch. The Dodgers no doubt wanted to go through the entire playoffs with only 3 starters. Met fans are so dumb, no wonder all your players want out.

      6
      Reply
    • Bart Harley Jarvis

      1 month ago

      I can’t believe Tyler Glasnow will have been paid approximately $180MM over the course of his career as a starter, most likely without pitching 1,000 innings.
      America is truly the land of opportunity.

      5
      Reply
    • JerseyShoreScore

      1 month ago

      Glasnow has been around for a decade and his CAREER HIGH in Innings Pitched in a season came with the Dodgers….

      1
      Reply
    • seth3120

      1 month ago

      It’s not like Glasnow hasn’t had injury history. The fact that he’s effective when healthy makes me seriously doubt your conspiracy. If they hope to trade him and can’t his IL stints will be the main hang up

      Reply
      • seth3120

        1 month ago

        You IL guys struggling not Glasnow. The Dodgers aren’t pinching pennies trying to avoid contract milestones especially with the injury issues last year. If he’s healthy he’s worth every penny in today’s market

        Reply
  2. Simm

    1 month ago

    Dude isn’t worth 30m a year to pitch roughly 100 innings.

    Think if he gets moved the dodgers will be paying down that contract.

    17
    Reply
    • Joemo

      1 month ago

      This is why I can’t see him being traded. The Dodgers are the perfect fit for him. They have enough pitching depth and money that they can afford for him to be hurt, as long as he’s healthy for the playoffs.

      16
      Reply
      • dlj0527

        1 month ago

        MLB would be different, if players had to active set number of days during season to qualify for spot on a playoff roster. I wish all big 4 leagues had such a roster rule.

        2
        Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          1 month ago

          dlj

          Who does this benefit? What problem does it solve?

          2
          Reply
        • dlj0527

          1 month ago

          The NBA model of the rule will prevent players from winning end of season awards, if they miss too many games. Then NBA teams have a reputation for just sitting players whenever they want to sit them. MLB teams just send a player down or place them on IL for minor injury to free up roster spot. I’d say a benefit is teams can’t stash a player away during season and then use them for playoffs only in all of the sports leagues.

          2
          Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          1 month ago

          “The NBA model of the rule will prevent players from winning end of season awards, if they miss too many games”

          Seems 100% unnecessary

          The more games you miss, the harder to win awards.

          “I’d say a benefit is teams can’t stash a player away during season and then use them for playoffs”

          So, your “benefit” is that players would be more likely to be injured?

          1
          Reply
        • dlj0527

          1 month ago

          I’m also a skeptic when it comes to how teams use IL placements in all the sports and how roster’s can be manipulated by certain teams. It is nice to know that the leagues probably do monitor this sort of thing but sometimes they don’t catch a team until it is too late.

          1
          Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          1 month ago

          Sure

          But

          If established players were being sent to the IL when they weren’t injured, they could complain about it. They’ve signed their contracts.

          Players still under team control might be less willing to make an issue of it for fear of risking future employment. And they go on the IL, though, they are getting MLB pay and gaining service time, which benefits them.

          I just don’t think it’s that big of a deal.

          1
          Reply
        • Citizen1

          1 month ago

          NBA model seems to allow gambling scandals

          1
          Reply
      • CarverAndrews

        1 month ago

        Exactly – he is worth a lot more to the Dodgers than to the rest of baseball as teams that are willing to pay $30M per year for a rotation arm would actually like to see them pitch at least 150 plus innings per season.

        The Dodgers are able to swallow so much extra payroll that they can afford to ramp him up for the playoffs. But don’t tell the Dodgers fans, who think that it is all an even playing field…

        4
        Reply
    • JuanUribeJazzHands

      1 month ago

      Simm

      Per FanGraphs, he was worth $31 million in 2024

      And 13 million in 2025

      That, though, doesn’t count any playoff performance – which added to his value this season

      Reply
      • Simm

        1 month ago

        He has a long history of not pitching very many innings. If he would have backed up 134 innings in 24’ with that or more in 25’ then sure he could be worth it.

        Instead it went back down to 90 innings.

        I don’t think they can find a single team to risk 30m the next two seasons with his injury history. He will be a dodger next season barring them paying down a significant amount of his contract.

        8
        Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          1 month ago

          I also believe teams know what’s coming next and I doubt a team would help the Dodgers. Given the injuries’ history, he’ll be more valuable in 27 when the strike/lockout will shorten the season.

          Reply
        • Simm

          1 month ago

          Dewey- fair points. Glasnow does look more appealing at a 10m or so, 60 game season.

          Problem is nobody knows how long the 2027 season will be. I don’t think baseball will risk losing too much of the season.

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          1 month ago

          Simm, there is so much money being thrown out there that I hope you’re right but I also believe even big team owners are pissed at the Dodgers and the rules allowing for them to basically get any Asian player they want and defer the money that is also hurting many states. Thus, I see many owners looking for a true cap and floor, which without fully opening up their books, will be a non-starter for the players.

          1
          Reply
      • JerseyShoreScore

        1 month ago

        If a team is good bet to make the playoffs, I’d much prefer Glasnow’s limited regular season innings and elite starts, including the playoffs than Dylan Cease’s dependable 200 IPs and disastrous playoff track record…

        $30 million a year in each case.

        1
        Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          1 month ago

          JSS

          Pretty much

          I just think that Cease’s playoff struggles are much more likely the result of small sample randomness than an inability to perform in months with double digits and he’s likely to pitch to his career norms going forward.

          Reply
    • michaelchavez22

      1 month ago

      Today’s going rate for pitchers, he’s worth. But like everyone is saying, he’s injury prone. A team can use him. AL East and AL Central come to mind.

      Reply
  3. Bronxlou

    1 month ago

    Are the Dodgers clearing the decks for Skubal?

    2
    Reply
    • Goku the Knowledgable One

      1 month ago

      One can only hope.

      Everyone needs to go to the Dodgers.

      It’s really healthy for the league. Im sure that Tigers fans who finally had something to cheer for last season would absolutely love to see that happen.

      9
      Reply
      • Motor City Beach Bum

        1 month ago

        Goku …on behalf of Tigers fans we would HATE to see him go to the Dodgers!

        2
        Reply
        • PandaMan

          1 month ago

          Motor City Beach Bum…on behalf of baseball fans everywhere we would HATE to see him to go to the Dodgers!

          2
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          1 month ago

          As a Sox fan, I never hated Steinbrenner. I just wanted my owner to become just like him. Today, I hate everything Dodger blue. I’m hopeful the next CBA will limit each team to two Asian imports. Asian leagues have long limited the number of Americans on each team and it would be good for the league to do the same with their talented players. I also would like to see the taxes or cap be based on a cost of living scale. In areas where taxes are high or where it simply costs more to live, the limits for those teams should be higher. Finally, my best proposal for the next CBA (IMO) is to incentivize players and owners to stay where they are. In contracts five years or more, after 4 years, only 50% counts against the tax layer or cap. Thus will either benefit both during free agency or help the old team at the deadline. other teams may offer more if they see a future free agency benefit at season’s end.

          Reply
        • Klink

          1 month ago

          This is such an acutely targeted response I don’t even know where to begin. First of all, they limit the number of spots of ALL foreign players, not just Americans. You’re tailoring your hopeful outcome specifically out of Dodger spite. Second- why wouldn’t that rule apply to all foreign players (Dominican, Venezuelan, Mexican, Cuban, etc.)? I seem to remember several Sox teams that greatly benefited from foreign imports…

          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          1 month ago

          Dewey,

          I don’t think it will happen, but it would be hilarious to read your comments if they traded Glasnow and Stone or Sheenhan for Skubal, then signed Imai.

          1
          Reply
    • Motor City Beach Bum

      1 month ago

      There was a Skubal package floated with Glasnow, Sheehan and Hope. It was intriguing because it would keep the rotation at least close to the production from last year. Two controlled pitchers softens the blow of Mize and Flaherty becoming free agents (and Skubal would be too). They would still have Glasnow, Sheehan, Melton, Olson and Jobe back full time from injury. That is a pretty strong rotation.

      The Tigers need help on offence as well though and, unless they go sign a big bat, I think they would want someone closer to MLB back as part of the package for Skubal.

      The Glasnow/Sheehan package is intriguing as a starting point but I still think Detroit keeps Skubal.

      2
      Reply
      • Salzilla

        1 month ago

        @Motor I think three years of Glasnow plus Sheehan and Hope might be too much. I can see Glasnow, Hope, and another prospect. Or just Glasnow and Sheehan and some cash for Tyler’s contract.

        3
        Reply
        • Motor City Beach Bum

          1 month ago

          Hey Sal…the Tigers ask for Skubal seems to be so big that I dont think anyone will meet it unless they get desperate. The Dodgers certainly are not desperate…unless they want to block a competitor? The Mets are a team I could see becoming desperate if they dont add the pieces they need. I don’t think any team will pat Detroit’s price. I don’t blame Harris and Greenberg for listening though.

          1
          Reply
        • Salzilla

          1 month ago

          Motor, I think it depends on if LA also wants to get away from Glasnow which if his name is making the rounds there’s gotta be at least a little smoke. The guy is great when he’s on the field, but that’s the issue.

          I do think you’re right in saying that the Mets would be a more desperate team and possibly could offer the most intriguing package.

          1
          Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        1 month ago

        I see zero Tiger interest in Glasnow.

        If the Tigers trade Skubal, I would think they want Hope, de Paula, Morales, and Ferris. Plus one out of Sheehan and Stone.

        The ask should be high enough that Dodgers say no.

        3
        Reply
        • Motor City Beach Bum

          1 month ago

          The Tigers can keep the contention windows open now and later by focusing on more MLB ready players than prospects. Prospects are ALL wild cards and often dont make it. Making the playoffs this year if they trade Skubal will still be essential to keep the fan base from rioting! Hopefully the just pay him.

          Reply
    • cwsOverhaul

      1 month ago

      @Bronx: Could very well be. Dodgers or Mets will have to compete to offer Tigers way more than sane to rent Skubal and hope he/Boras will say yes to 400mil record SP guarantee extension.

      Reply
    • No ABS in '27

      1 month ago

      I dont think it makes sense to clear Glasnow for Skubal, Glasnow is a solid 2 in my book.

      Glasnow as part of a trade to Detroit makes sense if the Tigers like Glasnow at 3/90M which I like compared to Cease at 7/210M.

      Detroit can replace their ace whom they dont intend on resigning with a viable ace on a short term deal. They would also likely add a nice return of prospects.

      Dodgers get a year of Skubal and salary relief trading Glasnow, opening up a spot for Sasaki in ‘2027. Even if they dont sign Skubal they still have Yamamoto, Ohtani, Snell and Sasaki.

      I think its a good trade.

      3
      Reply
      • Simm

        1 month ago

        Part of being an ace is being reliable. That’s why Cease got paid (though overpaid in my book).

        Glasnow year after year shows he isn’t reliable.

        4
        Reply
    • Anthony maresca

      1 month ago

      Nothing to clear as only way Dodgers get Skubal is if he signs extension which is not happening in Boras world unless the contract is 9/400 deal with ZERO deferred money. That puts Dodgers over $400 million payroll plus 110% tax hit so Skubal would cost $820 million. Thats foolish and every reason why 2027 season will be locked out as the deferrals will need to be eliminated or taxed money on top of salary floor and cap

      1
      Reply
    • Luis_Fazenda

      1 month ago

      I think they may be clearing the decks for the fact that, when healthy, they have enough quality starters to fill out two rotations. Not to mention that Glasnow is one of the most injury-prone arms in the game, and it’s only a matter of time before the shoe drops again.

      2
      Reply
  4. dlj0527

    1 month ago

    Before 2024, I thought Skubal was injury prone with HOF talent. I feel like Glasnow also has HOF talent but is also way more injury prone or like said above fake IL placement prone.

    Reply
    • kzw

      1 month ago

      DLJ, I’m not sure what the benefit would be of a “fake” IL placement for Glasnow. Speaking hypothetically and this is my own opinion, teams wouldn’t be putting their best players on the IL for no reason. Those are the guys you pay to be on the field. Not some middling setup man who is struggling, or a bench player (who can’t be optioned and isn’t hurt) who isn’t performing as well as the guy on a tear in AAA.

      Reply
    • AndyPagesBaserunningClinic

      1 month ago

      Three seasons ago, the Dodgers were chokers and now they’re ruining the game with how good they are and how well they run their organization

      How the turns have tabled on the doubters.

      5
      Reply
      • Simm

        1 month ago

        Andy- the dodgers have a projected payroll of 515m next season. Most teams in the can’t afford half of that payroll size.

        The financial parity in baseball is broken and nobody can argue that it’s not.

        2
        Reply
        • AndyPagesBaserunningClinic

          1 month ago

          Most teams spend way below their capabilities. The Dodgers aren’t the richest team on paper in the league. Why are they the only ones spending lavishly like they are?

          1
          Reply
  5. CFS77

    1 month ago

    Glassarm

    1
    Reply
  6. Annihilus

    1 month ago

    Why would the Tigers trade Cy Young Tarik Skubal to replace him with a high salaried, often injured pitcher?

    That doesn’t sound like a good return.

    10
    Reply
    • Motor City Beach Bum

      1 month ago

      Skubal is a free agent after this year and Glasnow is not. Glasnow was only part of a rumored package thst also included Sheehan and Hope.

      3
      Reply
    • padam

      1 month ago

      It’s not. It’s just hopeful Dodgers fans. Tigers aren’t taking Glasnow and money with one or two prospects. Tigers will want controllable players that are ready right now. Tigers are trending up and any package for Scooby is going to require a haul in return. He’s a difference maker.

      3
      Reply
      • highflyballintorightfield

        1 month ago

        Sheehan was the Dodgers #5 starter and pitched important innings in the World Series. He’s a very youngest established pitcher, not a prospect. One of the MLBTR writers said in a chat that Sheehan might not be suitable in a trade for Gore because he might be better than Gore.

        3
        Reply
  7. Salzilla

    1 month ago

    Glasnow as part of a Tarik package would be intriguing depending on if LA is also sending some money over. 3 seasons of Glasnow, cash, and a prospect or two for a year Skubal? Could work?

    1
    Reply
    • Motor City Beach Bum

      1 month ago

      The Tigers have room to take on salary and I would imagine if they offered the right prospects or young MLB players it would interest Detroit. Glasnow and Sheehan are controlled beyond this season which keeps them competitive this year and prospects help for sustained competitiveness. I still dont think they will do it though.

      Reply
    • Datashark

      1 month ago

      Why wouldn’t Tigers not just give 33-38M per season at least to Tarik instead of an already injured pitcher who is being paid 32M per season for low amount of starts

      2
      Reply
      • Motor City Beach Bum

        1 month ago

        The $450 million contract i keep seeing thrown around just seems like a fantasy. Skubal is awesome but that level of contract would blow away anything by a significant margin that has been given out recently. I hope they just pony up and give him a higher contract than Yamamoto this season and Skubal tells Biras to piss off and takes it 😉

        Reply
      • Steven hempel

        1 month ago

        Skubal is looking at a 8-10 year deal with 40+AAV per year next year. And he’s about to enter his 30’s. And it wouldn’t just be glasnow in the deal

        1
        Reply
      • kzw

        1 month ago

        Data…I don’t see there being any way that Skubal gets less than 40M a season. Gerritt Cole got 36M a season 6 years ago, and he wasn’t coming off a three year run (I’m including the upcoming season in this) where he won (at least) two Cy Youngs and prices have only gone up since. I also don’t see Skubal getting less than 7 years. Boras is going to ask for the moon, stars and the first born of all front office personnel for him next off-season. Is the player and ensuing contract more valuable than the player package they would get in a trade? Only the Tigers know that. Myself, being a fan of a small market team with the other best pitcher in baseball, I know what they are going to do. I can only hope it works out.

        1
        Reply
    • Simm

      1 month ago

      Starts with what would any team even pay glasnow right now to pitching maybe 100 innings.

      Perhaps 20m? So the dodgers have to include around 20m total for the next two years just to be able to move him for a very light return.

      So now the Dodgers have to then come up with the value of Skubal on the trade market.

      They could add more money for taking glasnow. Then prospects or current mlb players. Sheehan would likely be the starting spot. Then add in some minor leaguers to get the deal done.

      Tigers likely only trade him for an overpay so keep that in mind. Including glasnow just makes trading for Skubal more complicated. Dodgers may just trade him in a separate deal, pending on how the tigers value glasnow.

      1
      Reply
      • Salzilla

        1 month ago

        If the Tigers aren’t going to pay him and he is going to get paid a $#!+ton, possibly indeed in 400mil range, then they absolutely need to cash out and cash out big to whomever that may be.

        2
        Reply
        • Simm

          1 month ago

          The tigers are unlikely to pay him, that we agree on.

          I’m in the camp they should cash him in now. I actually think there is a decent chance they do.

          The tigers have also made the playoffs the last two years and with Skubal have a shot to make the playoffs next year. Then you add in the fans being upset they traded him. These things do matter when it comes to trading him.

          Hence why they are only going to trade him for an overpay. Adding in glasnow to a deal just makes it more complicated because he is over paid.

          There are also likely others willing to trade for Skubal though it’s a limited market given the trade cost and likely losing him in free agency. Mets/Yankees/Jays/Red Sox/cubs/dodgers…perhaps the O’s are about the only teams I can see even considering it. Even half of those teams I’d fine highly unlikely but as a free agent he will be on one of those teams in 2027.

          No matter who he goes to (if anyone) it’s going to be at a steep price. One most fans may seem unreasonable. If traded though dodgers are the most likely in my eyes.

          1
          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          1 month ago

          Personally I would love to see him long term in Detroit. But if they know that isn’t going to happen, you trade him for as much as you can get.

          Currently in trade he’s a one year rental, so his price isn’t as high as it would have been if this wasn’t his walk year. So if the Dodgers make an offer, it’s for one year of Skubal. It would still be a significant price though.

          Whether or not they want to sign him long term is a separate thing. The goal is 2026. And who knows, with possibly CBA changes, they might have the advantage resigning him. Wouldn’t that be ironic.

          Reply
  8. Oppo nacho

    1 month ago

    Was that the same offseason the signed ohtani (700m) and Yamamoto (300m)?

    1
    Reply
    • angelsfan4life

      1 month ago

      And the Dodgers are covering 87 million of the 90 million he is owed. No team is taking Glanow, straight up. Unless they are taking someone like Anthony Rendon in return

      2
      Reply
  9. E munchy

    1 month ago

    I’d be so pissed / hurt being traded from the Dodgers.

    1
    Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      1 month ago

      Remember that Jack Flaherty was a Dodger last year, and really wanted to go back to the Tigers. So any Dodgers player who might get traded probably heard about the Tigers from him on the way to winning the championship that year.

      They’d be getting traded to a team expected to be in the playoffs, not a rebuild.

      Reply
      • Wren

        1 month ago

        Jack really wanted to stay in LA and there was no room. not to mention his contract size. the Tigers accommodated him and he returned. but he openly stated multiple times his desire to return to the champs if he could.

        Reply
  10. YellowCleats

    1 month ago

    Glass elbow glassnow. They want to trade him so they can sign either Michael King, or Imai or Valdez to a large contract

    Reply
    • Steven hempel

      1 month ago

      Maybe imai but I don’t see it with the others. Just cause they have a lot of money doesn’t mean they’re dumb with it like the mets

      Reply
  11. Datashark

    1 month ago

    Tigers GM would need to be fired to move a two-time Cy Young for an overpaid injury plagued pitcher who likely will only get you 10-12 games a season for 32M per season

    Reply
    • Motor City Beach Bum

      1 month ago

      It would not be straight up though. Rumored package have Sheehan and prospects as well.

      4
      Reply
    • Moonlight Graham

      1 month ago

      There are several rumored packages that the Dodgers could be putting together. None sound that great, especially compared to what some other teams (leading with the Mets) could offer.

      Glasnow is 32 and has never pitched more than 134 innings in a season. He would require a significant pay-down in salary. Beyond that, the Dodgers prospects, in my humble opinion, are largely overrated. (I tend to believe the Yankees and Dodgers get artificial hype on the top-100 prospect lists.)

      Reply
      • Salzilla

        1 month ago

        Who does this artificial hyping? GMs have much better resources to evaluate talent than we do. They wouldn’t take prospects from NYY and LAD if not and they never have any issue making deals with them. This overhype nonsense comes from opposing fans needing to rationalize why their teams aren’t making these deals with their own ballyhoo’d prospects.

        5
        Reply
        • Simm

          1 month ago

          Sal- add in these teams have way more resources to evaluate talent. They aren’t going to some prospect ranking board to see who is better than who.

          Plus you have to also add in the amount of resources teams like the Dodgers and Yankees can put into finding talent. They may have some dudes that flameout…so do all teams. They just find more of them in some cases increasing the overall numbers that flameout. That doesn’t mean the percentage of flameouts are any higher.

          Reply
  12. Knowmore Thanyou

    1 month ago

    In my research I could only find 2 instances in the last 40 years when a starting pitcher was traded from a club that had just won a World Series Championship. Al Leiter to the Mets in Florida’s Post-World Series fire sale in ’97/’98 and David Wells (and others) to Toronto for Roger Clemens after the Yankees swept in 1998 (trade made in 1999). One trade was made as part of a fire sale, the other was to upgrade to Roger Clemens. Generally speaking, you’d have to be crazy to trade a frontline starter from a team that just won a Championship.

    Dodgers aren’t in a fire sale, of course, and don’t need to retool a loaded farm system, nor do they need to lower their tax burden as highly profitable as they are, so the only way Glasnow, a hometown guy whose only fault is that, even his giant 6’8″ frame can’t handle the stress and strain of his delivery, gets traded, is for an extreme upgrade somewhere and since the Dodgers value starting pitching, I’m guessing he’d go in a Skubal deal above all other deals possible right now.

    3
    Reply
    • highflyballintorightfield

      1 month ago

      Thanks for the research. A Clemens type deal for Skubal, with the Dodgers upgrading and the Tigers wanting to maintain some level of competitiveness is the only type of deal I could see for Glasnow. The Dodgers hair-trigger (to be charitable) use of the DL means their young pitchers will have opportunities, and they don’t need to save money or restock the farm system. If he’s not needed for an upgrade like Skubal, keeping Glasnow for 90 innings ÷ playoffs is his best use.

      Reply
    • norcalblue

      1 month ago

      excellent points, Knownore

      Reply
  13. dirtbagbaseball427

    1 month ago

    Glasnow in a trade for Skubal…now THAT is what would be bad for baseball. Clueless organizations that overrate a guy like Glasnow who has never shown he can stay healthy, enough to trade the reigning two time Cy young winner for him. Why would the dodgers give them much more than him as far as prospects if he’s going to test FA with Boras next year? I think this is a lot more realistic than a lot of writers I’ve seen are putting on

    1
    Reply
  14. jvent

    1 month ago

    Glasnow to the Mets for McNeil and Senga ( since most Japanese players want to play on the West Coast).

    Reply
    • Kubanis427

      1 month ago

      I like McNeil, Senga can’t stay healthy(Glassnow has missed a lot of time as well).

      Reply
  15. Hot Corner IJ

    1 month ago

    A deal for just Glasnow for say Perez of the Tigers that would provide the Dodgees with OF bat would also need to include at least 2 to 3 of the Dodgers top 10 prospects.. If the Tigers also traded Skubal they should get 3 top propspects of the Tigers choice plus 1 pitcher off of the Dodgers roster. Glasnow is a bad contract.

    Reply
  16. Mr Rickey

    1 month ago

    Skubal talk is all smoke, no fire. Boras prefers free agency to extensions so Skubal would be a one yr rental. Too expensive if we are to believe the supposed return.

    Reply
    • Knowmore Thanyou

      1 month ago

      Usually, you’re 100% correct. Boras’ clients go to market… period. But facing a lockout, with at least the possibility of significant changes to the CBA that could negatively impact Skubal’s value, Boras would be more willing to work out an extension for Skubal with a team like LAD. There are only a couple of teams that can get DET what they need (Juan Soto-type deal) without destroying their farm and Major League depth, and could possibly afford Skubal on the back end as well… And I’m telling you all, it ain’t the Mets. It’s more like LAD, Seattle, and Milwaukee, and I don’t know what good young starters SEA and MIL have that they could actually part with for Skubal. The Dodgers have a few, including Sheehan, who is battle-tested already. Skubal should be dealt, and the Dodgers simply make the most sense to me.

      Reply
      • Simm

        1 month ago

        Knowmore- good points about the cba changes. There could be real clamps put on high spending teams in 27’.

        So teams like the dodgers may want to lock in some grandfathered deals. If Boras is smart he could see that and do a mega extension. Would take likely in the 400m range.

        1
        Reply
        • Knowmore Thanyou

          1 month ago

          Depends on how long a team like LAD wants to go from a “term” standpoint. And if there are deferrals and opt-outs (Boras loves a good opt-out). The Dodgers signed Yama to a 12-year deal when he was 25. Skubal is 29 now. The longest they may go is 8 years, which means the most he’d probably get would be $320M.

          Reply
      • Mr Rickey

        1 month ago

        @knowmore
        There will be no cap. I believe LAD kicked the tires on a Skubal deal and yes they can afford the human and financial capital. But I will be surprised if a deal actually comes together this winter.

        1
        Reply
  17. Ranger 7

    1 month ago

    Tyler Glasnow and Tommy Edman from LAD to TEX for Corey Seager.

    Jordan Westburg and Ryan Mountcastle from BAL to TEX

    Kumar Rocker and Jose Corniell from TEX to BAL

    Jackson Ferris from LAD to BAL

    Reply
    • AndyPagesBaserunningClinic

      1 month ago

      Look at all the MLB ready or soon to be ready youth the Dodgers have. It’s truly the best run organization in professional sports.

      4
      Reply
    • VA/NC Orioles

      1 month ago

      Definite no for Baltimore. Need to find a way to keep Westy and add Seagar with Glasnow. I’d start all conversations with Jackson, Mayo, and all of there top 5 prospects.

      Reply
      • AndyPagesBaserunningClinic

        1 month ago

        Fans always overrate their prospects. If/when a trade happens, watch the jaws drop when “that’s all it took?”

        Reply
  18. Payne Train

    1 month ago

    Let all of these players and their money rot in LA long term, don’t bail them out !!!

    1
    Reply
    • AndyPagesBaserunningClinic

      1 month ago

      Yes, don’t bail the Dodgers out. They’re struggling so badly these past couple seasons.

      Reply
      • Payne Train

        1 month ago

        I’m saying that teams can’t stop LA from buying championships but they can make them suffer through these long term contracts instead of bailing them out.

        2
        Reply
        • AndyPagesBaserunningClinic

          1 month ago

          Buying championships, signed Miguel Rojas, Max Muncy, ialreadyforgethisfirstname O’Neill, Andy Pages, Tommy Edman, and any other scrub who nobody wanted with a leaky bullpen at best. Y’all even said the Blue Jays were the best team in the Series.

          Where is the Blue Jays wrecking baseball comments because they bought Scherzer and Gausman?

          Are only homegrown talents supposed to play on MLB teams now?

          Got old a long time ago and you guys are still whining about buying championships as if the Dodgers should quit trying to use what they have to win rings.

          Jealousy and envy are two of the deadlies and you guys are the Kings of them.

          Reply
  19. ptpheonix

    1 month ago

    This guy is injured EVERY year no thanks

    Reply
  20. bbgods

    1 month ago

    Glasnow is just the kind of SP that David Stearns likes.

    Reply
  21. Hot Corner IJ

    1 month ago

    Maybe this: Skubal and Greene to the Dodgers. Glasnow and the Dodgers 10 prospects of the Tigers choosing. go to the Tigers. They want Skubal. They want a legit bat. They want to get rid of Glasnow’s bad contract. It just comes at a price.

    Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      1 month ago

      One. Year. Rental.

      Reply
  22. JuanUribeJazzHands

    1 month ago

    As a Dodger fan

    1) I hope the team doesn’t trade Glasnow

    2) I will be THRILLED if the team trades for Skubal

    3) I will have mixed emotions if the team includes Glasnow in a Skubal trade

    The rumored trade of Glasnow, Sheehan and Hope works out almost perfectly per BTV’S numbers

    *Skubal $61

    *Sheehan $39
    *Hope $33
    *Glasnow $-8
    *TOTAL $64

    Dodgers give up a lot for one season of Skubal (3 years of Glasnow, 4 years of Sheehan and potentially 6 years of Hope).

    If the Tigers aren’t going to extend Skubal, getting two starters to plug into their rotation for, likely, less than they would pay Skubal, plus a top 100 prospect is certainly not nothing.

    Is it the best deal they could get? Who knows?

    Also, Detroit and LA value these players differently than BTV. Dodgers might think it’s a steal for them, while Detroit thinks a steal for them. Or vice versa.

    2
    Reply
    • Simm

      1 month ago

      I just don’t see the tigers considering this deal without a significant amount of money being included with glasnow.

      Think if you kick out glasnow from the deal and add more prospects it has a better chance of getting done.

      Sheehan, hope and other prospects. The tigers then could use the nearly 20m in salary saved from trading Skubal to sign a more reliable starter in free agency than Glasnow.

      Dodgers can then dump glasnow in a different trade. Perhaps to the Mets who like high aav low years pitchers. The O’s or cubs could be other options.

      1
      Reply
      • Knowmore Thanyou

        1 month ago

        The Dodgers are printing money these days… I don’t think money is going to be a problem in any deal they truly want.

        Reply
    • vpsd

      1 month ago

      You are not going to get Skubal for the BTV price.

      He’s the indisputably the best pitcher in baseball. There’s a massive premium for that.

      Reply
      • JuanUribeJazzHands

        1 month ago

        vspd

        Cite your evidence to support your claim

        Show that BTV systematically underestimates the trade values of elite players

        Reply
        • vpsd

          1 month ago

          nah man i didnt sign up for a research project, feel free to carry on with your delusions.

          Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          1 month ago

          vpsd

          So, the answer is that you don’t actually know and are just making [stuff] up

          Quelle suprise!

          Reply
      • Another Dodgers Fan

        1 month ago

        One. Year. Rental.

        That’s what the Tigers are trading.

        Reply
  23. fred-3

    1 month ago

    This actually makes sense. Glasnow was healthy in the 2nd half and great in the playoffs, so you might as well try to sell high on him.

    Reply
  24. C'Bad Jeff

    1 month ago

    You all do realize that while the baseball world talks Bellinger, Tucker and Skubal, AJ Preller has retooled the Padres bullpen with Ty Adcock and Daison Acosta?

    1
    Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      1 month ago

      And he still has Machado and Xander to build around through 2033.

      Reply
  25. Outfieldflyrule??

    1 month ago

    $30m per year for an oft-injured pitcher?? Unless they’re willing to eat $$$ no thanks!!

    1
    Reply
  26. mrpappageorgio1

    1 month ago

    Can’t imagine Detroit taking on that salary when they could extend Skubal. I would imagine Detroit would want a haul of young cost controlled guys.

    Reply
    • Knowmore Thanyou

      1 month ago

      Well, DET isn’t rebuilding, or even retooling. They’re stuck in an enviable situation where they have the best pitcher in the game about to become a free agent represented by Scott Boras while staring into the abyss of a lengthy work stoppage. If they decide they need to trade Skubal, they need a strong veteran pitcher to maintain their rotation, Young rotation depth, and who doesn’t need more high-level prospects? The Dodgers have all this plus plenty of money to pay down a veteran contract.

      2
      Reply
  27. amk1920

    1 month ago

    “Not worth his salary” yeah by like maybe 5 million. Glasnow has been an elite starter for the Dodgers and essential to both their championships. Dominated the Phillies in the NLDS clincer and the Brew crew to go up 3-0 but sure bullpen only. He would be the Padres ace right now. Nice try Pads Fans.

    1
    Reply
    • amk1920

      1 month ago

      As a Dodger under the contract: 40 starts 2 years. He’s not a model of durability but you talk about him like he’s Anthony Rendon. If you want to say Glasnow provides more value as a Dodger where they can handle his IL trips and still win, I’ll buy that. To say he is not a starting pitcher is a joke lmao. Glasnow is a starter on 30/30 teams. Most won’t want his contract but if he’s on the roster he’s starting and none of the yellow and brown paint you are sniffing will change that

      Reply
    • amk1920

      1 month ago

      Your claim that most teams wouldn’t be well off paying Glasnow to start is bogus. Teams routinely pay SPs that are injury risks because it comes with tbe territory. Your golden boy Preller paid Darvish until he is 42. Do you think he expected 6 full seasons out of that extension? Red Sox paid Giolito and he immediately missed a whole season. Giants traded for Robbie Ray while he just had Tommy John. Mets paid Montas as a huge injury risk and he missed basically two seasons. Phillies paid mediocre Taijuan Walker 72 million. Blue Jays gave Berrios a huge deal and he’s been mediocre. Yankees paid Rodon and they had to wash out his first season. Rangers gave deGrom a huge deal and guess what made of glass. Starting pitching is gold and plenty of teams would love to have Glasnow at his salary. The leauge is littered with overpaid injury prone pitchers but to you Glasnow is the one who teams should avoid LOL

      Reply
    • amk1920

      1 month ago

      Your sample size gotchas are so weak get better material before you change your username next week. Its funny because I gassed up Wrobleski and Sheehan as FUTURE big players, not current all stars. Do you know why Skubal was gassed up coming into 2024? It was his stuff popping off the charts, not his past sample sizes. So while everyone was predicting Skubal would have a big year in 2024, you would have been yapping sample size. Glasnow has 61 starts over the last three seasons. Not the most durable player but 20 starts per year is respectable and he pitches at an ace level in those starts. But sure he’s too risky as a starter while 4 players in front of him in pitcher AAV missed entire seasons and one flat out sitnks in Aaron Nola

      Reply
    • amk1920

      1 month ago

      “Daddy why is that guy over there in the corner mumbling about sample size?” “I don’t know son but Glasnow just shoved against the Phillies to set us up to win the NLDS”

      Reply
    • amk1920

      1 month ago

      I am honored at how much of an admirer you are but you need therapy for clear schizophrenia talking stock of every discussion we had and your constant changing of usernames. Its easy to lie to fit your narrative. The only one of those 3 replies you stacked that is even close to the truth of what I said is Cronenworth. And the great part is with the Padres poverty issues we will see how much trade value he has as Preller tries to trade his 5 remaining years of control at age 32. Varland v Miller is a clear lie. I said trading for Varland would be a better value than Miller because trading Leo De Vries was absurd. You could at least try and make it not look like a complete lie since that convo was days ago. There are already rumors of Preller trading Mason Miller, What smooth operation you got going there. Sheehan and Wrobleki are my favorite obsession of yours. I said they are going to be big pieces MOVING FORWARD but you love to scratch your hands like a deranged person and squawk “sample size”. There is a reason the Tigers want Sheehan in the deal for Skubal. If it happens I will tell the Tigers GM to expect your knock on his door asking if you’ve seen his sample size.

      Reply
  28. octavian8

    1 month ago

    Dodgers might as well get Skenes too and we can all play for second place

    Reply
    • JuanUribeJazzHands

      1 month ago

      This

      But non-sarcastically

      Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      1 month ago

      I’m sure they are working on it. But he has way too much control to bother letting go for the Pirates.

      Plus, the Pirates are making noise like they are getting ready to compete. They might not get the top end free agents, but they do have a good core of young players coming up.

      Hopefully they spend the money, add the right pieces, and surprise everyone. Their fans deserve it.

      Reply
  29. deuceball

    1 month ago

    Glasnow, teoscar, daulton rushing and kellon Lindsay for trout.

    Reply
  30. VA/NC Orioles

    1 month ago

    ORIOLES ON LINE 1!!!

    1
    Reply
  31. Butters

    1 month ago

    I’m certain dodgers would love to move him, off loading that owed $ however buyer beware signs are all over this would be deal. If a team does trade and doesn’t hold the dodgers feet to the fire in paying most of that remaining contract and at the same time not having to give up better trade prospects or players… maybe then it would make sense to trade for him. Of course it’s only my opinion.

    Reply
  32. hoof hearted

    1 month ago

    That is an albatross contract, for the kind of production he provides. Or lack of production for that amount of money

    Reply
  33. Rsox

    1 month ago

    The Dodgers are already regretting extending (madeof)Glasnow? Or have they finally realized building a rotation around veterans that are either injured for half of the season or can’t go 5 innings in most starts forcing them to have to have another rotation and half’s worth of starting pitching on hand isn’t truly sustainable?

    Reply
    • Mendoza Line 215

      1 month ago

      They realized that a long time ago,at least ten years.
      Glasgow is a fine pitcher but they are paying him for one half a season.
      If he has been injury prone before 32 what will happen after 32?
      He was traded for to pitch in the playoffs and that is his value.
      No one will take him unless the Dodgers eat half of what is owed to him.
      The Dodgers have so much money and had not won a WS in a full season since 1988 so they have wanted to corner the market but may be finally tired of paying the luxury tax.
      They realized that their team is the oldest or second oldest in MLB so they figured to go for it and consequently have won two WS in a row.
      Those pennants are forever.

      Reply
  34. foppert3

    1 month ago

    Ha ha. Farking Dodgers. Seeing how much the starving peasants will pay for their three quarter eaten leg of ham. Too good.

    Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      1 month ago

      This made me laugh. Had visions of medieval times sitting around the fire bartering.

      Reply
  35. Kubanis427

    1 month ago

    I’m assuming his name has been brought up only in relation to Skubal.. I’m sure some teams have checked in, however this guy proved that he is great in the playoffs… I would only say he goes if it is a package to get Skubal..

    Reply
  36. vpsd

    1 month ago

    Glasnow is really a perfect fit with the dodgers. They have the money to pay 10 starters big money then hide them on the IL to load manage them and have them ready for the playoffs.

    If the dodgers are looking to move off of Glasnow, that would have me VERY scared as an opposing GM.

    Glasnow seems like a negative value contract to me right now.

    Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      1 month ago

      I think trading him is only in relation to getting Skubal. But you never know.

      Reply
  37. Citizen1

    1 month ago

    Throw in freeman with Glasgow to the Tigers for Skubal and it could work. Detroit will just make Glasgow their 5 innings pitcher.

    Reply
  38. Troutahni

    1 month ago

    He’s a hometown kid. Go trade for him, Perry.

    Reply
  39. Troutahni

    1 month ago

    This would be perfect for the Tigers. Give them Skubal and Jake Rogers. Ask for Rushing to team with Dingle and have them give you some salary relief for Teoscar Hernandez. Rushing can sometimes start at Firstbase for Torkleson to get him off his feet against a tough righthander. If not Hernandez, ask them to give you Sheehan. I think this would be really advantageous for Detroit and catapult them to become one of the favorites for the AL Pennant. You will no longer have to be distracted by Skubal’s impending free agency. I really like Sheehan.

    Reply
  40. Another Dodgers Fan

    1 month ago

    They aren’t done. In other news:

    “We feel good about something lining up but may have to be a little patient”

    Andrew Friedman discussing the position player need with Kiersten Watson.

    No idea who it could be, but it’ll be interesting to see.

    Reply
  41. Rays in the Bay

    1 month ago

    Dodgers overpay for an oft-injured player and thinks they can offload him via trade? Good luck. Only if the Dodgers pay for most of that contract and the prospects returning are mid. Even then. If I’m any other team I’m not giving up prospects to actually relieve the Dodgers of salary cap money. They probably know the CBA talks will result in some harsher penalties and shored up loopholes and are trying to cut some of those overpaid players before that happens. No thanks. Dodgers are pretty smart and I’m not giving them any relief.

    Reply
  42. MLBTR needs to hire editors

    1 month ago

    “Moving Glasnow sooner rather than later, therefore, would allow the Dodgers to sell high on the right-hander” is NOT how you use “therefore.” It should be “Moving Glasnow sooner rather than later would therefore allow the Dodgers to sell high on the right-hander.”

    And when “but” begins the sentence, there shouldn’t be a comma after it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Giants To Sign Harrison Bader

    Yankees Re-Sign Cody Bellinger

    Is MLB Parity Possible Without A Salary Cap?

    Guardians Agree To Extension With Jose Ramirez

    Yu Darvish Contemplating Retirement, Has Not Made Final Decision

    White Sox To Sign Seranthony Domínguez

    Nationals Rebuffed Interest From Giants In CJ Abrams

    Rangers Acquire MacKenzie Gore

    Brewers Trade Freddy Peralta To Mets

    Angels To Re-Sign Yoan Moncada

    Dodgers Sign Kyle Tucker

    Red Sox Sign Ranger Suárez

    White Sox Trade Luis Robert Jr. To Mets

    Carlos Beltran, Andruw Jones Elected To Hall Of Fame

    Mets Sign Bo Bichette

    Ha-Seong Kim Out Four To Five Months Following Hand Surgery

    Ryan Pressly Announces Retirement

    Phillies To Re-Sign J.T. Realmuto

    Elly De La Cruz Declined Franchise-Record Offer From Reds In 2025

    Twins Sign Victor Caratini

    Recent

    Giants To Sign Harrison Bader

    Which Team Will Sign Framber Valdez?

    Cardinals Sign Nelson Velazquez To Minor League Deal

    The Brewers’ Rotation Options After Peralta Trade

    Royals, Hector Neris Agree To Minor League Deal

    Cubs To Sign Gabe Klobosits To Minor League Deal

    Yankees Re-Sign Cody Bellinger

    Twins, Joe Ryan Avoid Arbitration

    Trade Rumors Front Office Subscriber Chat Transcript

    Angels, Nick Sandlin Agree To Minor League Deal

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android iTunes Play Store

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version