The Dodgers are back-to-back World Series champions thanks to a massive financial outlay over the past two offseasons that allowed them to bring in Shohei Ohtani, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Blake Snell, Tyler Glasnow, and a number of other pieces that were key to their current core. As they attempt to make it a threepeat, however, Bill Plunkett of the Orange County Register writes that president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman suggested to reporters that there’s “not as much heavy lifting required” this year as there was in previous winters, and acknowledged that the Dodgers may alter their approach somewhat as they look to avoid some of the perils that come with an aging core.
Andy Pages, Hyeseong Kim, and Dalton Rushing were the only three position players younger than 30 on the Dodgers’ roster this past year to appear in even 50 games. The pitching side has a bit more young talent thanks to the additions of Yamamoto and Sasaki, and homegrown arms like Emmet Sheehan, Ben Casparius, and Jack Dreyer all impacted the team as well. Even so, the Dodgers were already the oldest team in the majors this year (their Opening Day roster had an average age of 31.5). Freddie Freeman (36) and Mookie Betts (33) are under contract through their age-37 and -39 seasons, respectively. Snell is under contract through his age-36 campaign. Will Smith and Shohei Ohtani will play next year at age-31, but they’ll both be in Dodger blue until their age-38 seasons.
Long-term deals for free agents naturally come with a roster full of aging players as those deals progress. While Plunkett notes that the Dodgers feel the players they’ve invested in will age well, it’s not hard to see why concerns of eventual decline are present. That’s why Friedman said the age of the roster is something he’s keeping in mind as he makes decisions this winter. The Dodgers have a farm system rich with young talent, with seven top-100 prospects according to MLB.com including four at the Double-A level or higher. Friedman said that it will be important to be “thoughtful” about how those players are brought along at the big league level and made part of the team’s core.
It’s not always been easy for the team to find ways to plug in young talent. Rushing was viewed as ready to step into a big league role as early as last year by some in the industry, but has been blocked by Smith behind the plate. Pages was only able to step into an everyday role with the club this year thanks to a combination of injuries to Tommy Edman and ineffectiveness from Michael Conforto. Kim was signed primarily as a utility player and did not break out of that capacity. Alex Freeland is arguably big league ready at this point but is blocked by players like Edman, Betts, and Max Muncy headed into the 2026 season.
All of that is to say that there’s reason to believe reports that indicate the Dodgers may not be inclined to pursue a long-term deal with a star outfielder like Kyle Tucker. With well-regarded outfielders like Josue De Paula and Zyhir Hope coming up through the farm system, the outfield could be the team’s best opportunity to inject some youth into the roster. Signing Tucker (or even someone like old friend Cody Bellinger) on a deal that would last into his late thirties would be counter-productive to that goal, although the fit could make more sense if the Dodgers were to trade another aging player like Teoscar Hernandez, whose name has been rumored to be in play as part of trade talks this winter.
Of course, De Paula, Hope, and other young talents aren’t likely to be ready for the majors on Opening Day 2026. That means some sort of stopgap will be necessary, and Plunkett writes that the team could turn to the trade market to improve an outfield that stands out as the roster’s biggest weakness. Guardians left fielder Steven Kwan and Cardinals utility man Brendan Donovan stand out as among the best fits, though the Dodgers reportedly had some interest in Luis Robert Jr. last winter as well.
Plunkett also notes that, while the bullpen figures to be a focus for the Dodgers this winter after the departure of Michael Kopech, adding a surefire closer isn’t necessarily a high priority. While Tanner Scott’s first year in L.A. did not go as planned, Plunkett writes that Friedman expressed plenty of confidence in the lefty to be a “huge part” of the Dodgers in 2026. The Dodgers have been connected to Edwin Diaz and Robert Suarez this winter, but as the team looks to avoid adding aging players on long-term deals it’s possible they could instead look to pieces who could be had on short-term arrangements like Luke Weaver and Pete Fairbanks.

You don’t say…
Dodgers to sign Ben Gay and I.C.Hot to long term contracts to coincide with the length of Freeman’s and Betts comtracts. A mutual option is added to the end of the contract.
Both are signed to be used all over the place ( except for face and genital areas).
Freeman has two years left on his contract and is extremely touhh/durable.
Yeah, but that doesn’t mean the trainer isn’t rubbing it on and massaging it in after Freddie’s postgame whirlpool bath.
I see the Dodgers continuing the Asian trend with Ti Ger Balm.
Less “heavy lifting” to do!! That’s because they give the players wheelbarrows with the contracts so that they can cart the money around easier.
Did you read the same article as me? Did you read the article at all?
“not as much heavy lifting required”
just means LA alredy knows best japanese players are going to dodgers. so they dont have to convince them or do any work
When he’s ready for some more heavy lifting he can pick up deez nutz.
Lol
Cardinals will trade Donovan to the Dodgers, if they can take Arenado too. Then the Cardinals will only ask for a couple of arms, not top rank players. More of a salary dump then anything.
Because adding Arenado would really help mitigate an aging core. Gotcha.
100% wrong, Donovan will not be traded to aid in a salary dump
Donovan is one of the Cards best trade chips. They can get young talent back for him. Including him in a Arenado salary dump would be such a waste.
The Dodgers have no use for Arenado. A couple of years go, maybe, That window is closed. The Cards could get one of the Dodgers’ young starters for Donovan, if that’s what they are after — but they aren’t getting them to take on any rigor-mortis contacts.
I’d much rather the team take on Arenado than give up real talent.
Why would you rather give up a starter?
Take Arenado. Maybe Munce can play 2B. If not, buy another product prospect with Arenado’s salary
Increase talent in the organization, don’t lessen it
The Dodgers are sitting on a backlog of starting pitching, especially now with several valuable prospects returning from injuries. They can stockpile them for only so long. The rules say “play ’em or trade ’em.”
Starting six of: Ohtani, Yamamoto, Snell, Glasnow, Sasaki and Sheehan
Depth of: Ryan, Stone, Casparius, Wrobleski, Knack. Maybe Hurt. Maybe Miller.
Only Ryan and Stone really jump out as more than back end starters. And they are both coming off of injury.
Are you ready to trust lots of innings to Wrobleski and Casparius? Maybe. Knack?
Who’s next? Serwinowski? Ferris?
The Dodgers probably have the best rotation in baseball. And one of the deepest. But it’s not so deep at the moment that they need to start trading from it.
If they NEED to trade a young starter to get a player, sure. But if they can avoid it, I think they are still better off doing that.
The need to trade comes from exhausting options years and service time. Knack is right on the edge I believe. Ryan and Stone are probably higher value in some respects, but Knack would be in the rotation on many other teams so it feels as if he has to be dangled as trade bait. In any case, trades arise from opportunities to swap depth for a more immediate need. You have to give to get.
@blueskies
You make a good point on give and get, but trading from pitching i always found a bit risky because in 1 game you can go from abundance to your trading for arm. Plus with all the pitching injuries you had this season it was that surplus that got y’all tur the season me personally I’d wanna keep that.
If the team wants to trade Knack…ok
BTV gives him a $2 million trade value. So, basically nothing
Casparius and Wrobleski are not much more.
BTV had Donovan at $32 million.
Sheehan is $48 million. Sasaki $33 million. Do you want to trade one of them?
Next is Ryan at $18. So, they’d have to add in a Sorora ($21) or Morales ($15). Do you like that?
Arenado is at -$16.
You could do Donovan and Arenado for just Ryan? How about that?
I’d rather do Donovan and Arenado for just one of the hitters.
Then pay off Arenado and try and get back a hitter similar to who we gave up.
Anyone in the “depth” column can’t be counted on in 2026 until their recovery from injury can be evaluated. The year back post injury is a crap shoot. Sheehan and Wrobleski, while having outstanding arm, are wildly inconsistent. Hurt should be a candidate for high leverage innings depending on how he has recovered. And you can’t count on 32 starts from any of the starters with the possible exception of Yoshi, and that may be a stretch. If most show well in the Spring, then you’ve got a good problem. But several have options left.
I think Wrobleski can be a star.
You can’t “count on” anything in baseball. Everything is a probability calculation. At this point the Dodgers have to calculate their surplus in one area against deficits in another and make their best probability play. This is all any team can do.
“At this point the Dodgers have to calculate their surplus in one area against deficits in another and make their best probability play”
Right
And $ is part of that.
If they have a surplus of that use to acquire Donovan, and buy a prospect for Aranado’s contract
BTV is interesting, but their numbers are often nutty. Valuing Ryan coming off TJ and with little MLB experience at nearly ten times the excess value of Knack seems suspect right on the face of it.
I think it makes perfect sense
And their track record is very good
Knack was a 40 FV by Fangraphs when he lost eligibility
Ryan is a 50
Ryan was much better. Yes, the injury clouds that *some*
Even a bottom of the rotation starter is worth far more than they are valuing Knack with three more years pitching at the MLB minimum. Nutty. Even as a reliever he’s got more excess value than that.
The TJ clouds Ryan’s value a lot. Some pitchers come back from it strong, some don’t. Some take longer than others to regain their playing form. It’s a major variable. And Ryan is arbitration eligible one year sooner.
“Even a bottom of the rotation starter is worth far more than they are valuing Knack with three more years pitching at the MLB minimum.”
Not if they are replacement level
Not really. Nobody gets paid less than the minimum.
What?
The $2 million trade value means he’s expected to provide $2 million more in value than what he’s expected to be paid
Exactly. Do the math.
I have. And it makes perfect sense
Here’s the math that BTV used
baseballtradevalues.com/trades/202047
They expect him to provide $5 million in onfield value while being paid $3 million.
And a link to their methodology
baseballtradevalues.com/valuing-major-leaguers
What do you disagree with?
The difference between those is $2 million
What do you think is wrong
Doesn’t have to rig this offseason with 300M dollar deferrals guys, fair play 2026!
Did you think of that all by yourself?
Nah. Had lots of help.
He spent several hours running prompts through GPT to come up with that absolute gem of originality.
Is the players who sign the deferred contracts, not the TEAMS.
At least get the number right if you’re going to complain about deterred contacts.
That’s like complaining about someones Ferrari and not even realizing it’s a Bugatti.
Educate yourself.
/s sorta
Yeah! We’re saved
They’ll be monitoring the market and I’m sure they’ll snipe a guy or two.
That lineup still doesn’t have a full all-star team on it. Need some stars in the 7-9 slots.
6-7
@tommyl
Dodgers lineup had no offense last year. Jays just handed them the trophy with all the comical mistakes.
Yeah like those mistakes to Freeman, Ohtani, Rojas, Smith, Muncy, etc.
Two years in a row with the comical mistakes you say? The Dodgers thank the unintentional comedians of MLB.
@Another Dodgers Fan
Yes, never seen a worse team in my life…
Cool all-star stat
@simonkiller
You’re welcome! I’m here to help.
Look forward to the predictably nuanced conversation here for all things Dodgers related. 😏
must be really hard throwing blank checks to anyone you want
Do you have any idea how hard it is to throw a flat price of paper?
Will the bank still take a check if it’s folded into a paper airplane?
If you throw a paper airplane and it hits someone in the eye, will they come looking for you?
Well, you might need two paper airplanes.. one for each eye. Then you should be ok.
“Walk quietly and carry two paper airplanes”
Future movie quote.
Haha! Yes! Hopefully it’s the movie about the Dodgers threepeat!
They do need an OF and an actual closer, though, so some lifting is possible. I honestly think they’ll go big on Diaz and with the way Friedman is talking here maybe less so in the OF or a trade to facilitate that. I had Tucker to them, but I’m a little less convinced now.
same thoughts here. Diaz and Tucker would be perfect. Then sit back and chill until Kurtz and Skenes are on the block – that’s the pair to unload the farm for,
I’m sure they’ll pick up players on the margins, but you really never know, they might sign a reliever to add to the bullpen.
Blew J’s had game 7 locked up
Get a lead, meat
How about doing nothing this offseason?
Friedman may be blowing smoke. Wouldn’t be surprised if he pulls off an unexpected trade – Skubal & Riley Greene for Glasnow, Pages & LA Deferrals #1 or #2 prospect
You seem to be inhaling smoke.
Huffing perhaps.
Per BTV
Skubal $60
Greene $26
Total $86
Glasnow $-8
Pages $33
De Paula $46
Total $71
Not the worst trade proposal I’ve seen
What???!!!! De Paula after 4 years in organized ball got into only games at the AA level, went hitless in 18 at bats in which he struck out 5 times.
Somebody’s smoking something it they think he’s worth $46 per BTV.
And the Tigers take on Glasnow with his glass arm?
Yeah, this sounds like a Dodgers fans’ fantasy trade.
The Tigers will demand AND get controllable major league players AND near mahor league prospects for Skubal.
Not that junk you mention.
He’s worth $47 million per BTV
baseballtradevalues.com/trades/203516
And I don’t smoke
Take your Jim Rome hot taek attitude somewhere else
Messaging Boras.
Not too early to test Stone and Ryan as high leverage reliever.
Will Klein > Tanner Scott
Keep trying
I’d imagine AF is playing possum somewhat and hoping that Tucker’s 10 year 400mm and Diaz’s 5 year 100mm deals are going to recede as interest in them wanes. Both are overpriced at those numbers, but 28 y/o Tucker at 8/300 or 6/270 and 31 yo/o Diaz at 3/75 or 4/84 would be smart business and solve the two weak points of the Dodgers roster.
With the c.80mm shedded from 25s payroll that’s better than a break even re aav, a better roster, and still leaves room in ’27 for one of the OF prospects to replace Teo full time after getting a cup of coffee in ’26.
As a fan this would be the dream scenario, but even worst case I’d imagine they sign one of Diaz or Tucker as the aim is surely to improve year on year. It certainly has been the past two off seasons. People like Nootbar and Weaver aren’t going to do that…
So basically signing an outfielder short term unless they get a good trade for one of the young outfielders they’ve targeted.
If Scott has a rebound year, they have enough arms to fill out most of the bullpen just from young starters returning from injury.
I’m extremely curious to see what they actually do.
Pitching, pitching, pitching, if Skubal commits to signing a long term deal, work out a trade.
Robert Suarez for the bullpen. Then see how Teo does in right field to begin the season. Hopefully he is injury free now. Rushing splitting time in left, catcher & first base should give him plenty of at bats. If that gives A.F. heartburn, then a trade for Donovan, Duran or Kwan.
Chandlerbing is a truly awful commenter.
But why? Back to back WS Championships for this team that appears to have more money than God, I don’t understand why they wouldn’t need more heaving lifting. The title of this article and perceived need to report such comments, I personally find arrogant and offensive. State the obvious much?
And no, I didn’t read the article. I couldn’t get passed the headline.
Dodgers…go away. No one likes you since you stole my favorite player Kirk Gibson.