Back in the first week of March, Freddy Peralta and the Mets hadn’t yet begun any real discussions about a possible contract extension, and Peralta said he was looking to land a deal “seven or eight years” in length. In the latest update from Jon Heyman of the New York Post, the two sides have had some level of talks in the interim, and things remain far enough apart between Peralta and the Mets that an extension is “highly unlikely” to happen prior to Opening Day.
This doesn’t necessarily rule out a deal altogether. The Mets are reportedly open to talking even after play begins on March 26, and Peralta “didn’t say he was opposed” to continuing negotiations, though he told Heyman he would let his agents at ACES make that determination. Most players set Opening Day as a deadline for extension talks in order to focus exclusively on baseball, though this isn’t a uniform approach, and naturally negotiations often continue if the two sides feel they’re very close to finalizing an agreement.
Peralta is set to become a free agent next winter, which is why the Brewers were looking to trade the ace this offseason rather than just let him walk for a draft pick at season’s end. The Mets won the bidding to pry Peralta away from Milwaukee, and between both the hefty trade return and Peralta’s obvious ability, New York surely has interest in keeping Peralta in Queens for years to come. Exactly how many years seems to be the sticking point between the two parties, as Peralta’s aim for at least seven years runs counter to the Mets’ desire to sign pitchers to shorter-term contracts.
One potential compromise could be a four- or five-year extension worth a high average annual value, and with multiple opt-outs. The Mets used such a structure to land Bo Bichette on a three-year, $126MM free agent pact this offseason, and opt-outs were included in past contracts for Edwin Diaz and Pete Alonso. Due to the likelihood of a lockout next winter, an extension that contains an opt-out for perhaps as early as the 2027-28 offseason would allow Peralta to re-enter the market at age 31, and avoid any labor unrest.
Of course, Peralta also projects to be one of the top free agents available next winter, so his market may not be much affected since teams will be lining up to try and get him signed (likely before the Collective Bargaining Agreement expires on December 1). Peralta also may not want to compromise on his next contract after already signing what ended up being a very team-friendly extension with the Brewers early in his career. That five-year, $15.5MM extension turned into a seven-year deal worth an extra $14.5MM for Peralta once Milwaukee exercised both club options, yet it still amounted to a gigantic bargain for the Brew Crew as Peralta developed into a frontline pitcher.
David Stearns was the Brewers’ president of baseball operations at the time of Peralta’s extension, and Stearns now holds that same role in New York’s front office. Maybe Stearns is willing to go longer on a contract for a pitcher he obviously knows well and values highly, and with Peralta so close to free agency, the Mets might simply have to pay top dollar in order to keep Peralta from testing the market.
Speaking of the Mets and pitcher extensions, Heyman adds that “there’s no indication” that the Mets and Nolan McLean have discussed any long-term deals. McLean was an instant star in posting a 2.06 ERA over 48 innings in his 2025 debut season, and now looks like a cornerstone piece of New York’s rotation.
As MLBTR’s Contract Tracker indicates, it’s pretty rare for pitchers to sign long-term extensions when they have less than one year of MLB service time. Chris Archer‘s six-year, $25.5MM extension with the Rays from April 2014 remains the largest deal ever given to a pitcher with under a year of service time, and McLean’s reps at CAA would surely be looking to vastly surpass Archer’s number.

He had a career year last year and is not an ace. Enjoy him for the season and move on.
That’s definitely not happening. Thinking a 5 year deal for Peralta, and the Mutts.
Not sure why ou’d say “definitely”..Peralta wants 6+ years. The Mets don’t do that, and might not need to depending on how other pitchers develop this year (both experienced – Manaea, Senga; and youngsters – MMcLean, Scott, Ton, and a quartet of gius who pitched very well in Binghamton last year.
The Mutts right aren’t offering more than 5 years on contracts right now. It’s possible they could do 5 years, and a team or player option for a 6th season. The Mutts didn’t give up 2 prospects in their top ten, just to see Peralta walk after one season. That would be a horrible baseball decision. Cohen’s wallet will basically sign Freddy at the end of the day. The Mutts probably just want to see if he can handle pitching in NY lst before an extension. ($30 million AAV) for 5 years gets it done.
Why do NY fans think crap like “if he can handle pitching in NY” is a thing? NY isn’t special, sorry. Peralta has been pitching in MLB for 8 seasons. He can handle it. The Mets signed Devin Williams, if “handling pitching in NY” had any actual significance to the Mets, they wouldn’t have signed him.
Craig
Because it IS a thing. There are different expectations pitching in a big market team with more eyes and more boo birds compared to a small market team where they’re just happy to be competitive.
Devin Williams was only signed because Stearns is incapable of building a legit contender and has NO idea how to properly identify quality bull pen arms. Which is why exactly none of his bullpen pick ups have worked out in the 2+ years he’s been the GM of the Mets.
He sucked with the Yankees last year and now will suck for the Mets because some guys can not handle the bright lights and expectations that come with playing in one of the biggest sports market on the planet.
Nah, you guys are just super high on being New Yorkers, you think you’re something special. Keep thinking it, whatever your ego needs. Just know that it looks incredibly silly for those of us elsewhere.
Best thing about Devin Williams going to NYY was that organization finally released a fraction of their arrogance and ditched their antiquated and oppressive anti-facial hair policy.
Craig
I’m not even from New York, dont live in New York or even like new York as a place what are you talking about? If anything the fact you would assume I’m a New Yorker because I’m not a Dullard and can openly admit it is much different playing sports in New York then it is in Cleveland or Milwaukee or Pittsburg make YOU look silly sport. Besides, Did you see Peralta today? The pirates made him look completely touchable and like the number 3 starter he actually is. But yeah go off about a shaving policy lol.
Going by how much the Mets gave up for this guy they had to know what kind of contract he was gonna be looking for. I would think. They have to know they can sign him long term or they never would have done that deal.
Would it not make more sense to just wait a year and then offer him “whatever it takes” if they don’t think losing Sproat and Williams is worth one year of Peralta?
Williams is superfluous to AJ Ewing. Sproat experienced serious regression last season. They have more pitching coming up. Both players will be missed to an extent, but to be clear, their timelines weren’t lining up with the big club’s needs. Good get for Milwaukee for one season, but it’s not like the Mets gave up the future. Still a top 10 farm system, at minimum.
Mets are well stocked with pitching and Tong has surpassed Sproat.
It’s kind of similar to what Milwaukee got for Burnes, DJ Hall and Joey Ortiz. They were solid prospects, but not the best the O’s had to offer.
Even if those statements are true they could have been traded for something else. The decision wasn’t “trade them for Freddy Peralta or release them.”
I really don’t understand so many people on here. Like when the Cubs got Tucker, everybody was talking about they were probably gonna lose him at the end of the season and what a waste it was trading all that talent for him. There’s been comments like that forever when somebody trades for a one year rental. I say something and you and the other two on here just have absolutely no clue what I’m talking about. I know they didn’t trade future Hall of Famers for him but everybody on here has to throw in their two cents, and they know it all.
Realistically Steve Cohen can get Peralta signed if he wants because money but that would also be true if he didn’t trade for him. Trading for him unless he agrees to an extension as part of the trade doesn’t have the future in mind.
Not necessarily the case, Shadowpartner… I would not frame it in absolutes. So they gave up two big prospects for 1 year rental year of ace. Plenty of teams give up for a 2-month rental at the deadline. Plus the Mets got the added onus of being able to at least consider an extension.
As for how “much” they gave up, thats just perception. we do not know that the Mets perceive these players’ alues the same way the press does.
Steve Cohen doesn’t need to be able to consider an extension. The underlying reason teams want to extend players is $ and prospects are worth more to Steve Cohen than $.
Rally-so glad there are a genius yourself on here to explain things. You obviously deal with Steve daily otherwise you wouldn’t have said this. I was so wrong thank you for straightening me out.
@Shadowpartner Leave the snark to those of us who are good at it buddy.
GEO- it must just be me. Seriously. I’ve never seen commenters so against a statement like mine that has been uttered by so many for years and years. I’m flabbergasted at the amount of people on here that have absolutely no idea what I’m talking about. I just made a simple comment. I will say what I’ve said many times about commenters on this site. Somebody always has to come up acting like they know a little bit more than you do and they’ll give you 20 reasons why you don’t know what you’re talking about even if it’s just the simplest thing.
Shadow:
Maybe commenting isn’t suited for you. It seems like you’re being a tad sensitive with your “me against the world” mentality.
I think they knew they’d only be getting him for one year. It’s purely a win-now move.
Hammerin-thanks for your inside knowledge on this. I just read the article and was going by what the headline was but luckily you came through because you know so much more. Thank you.
I agree. Good, but a “7 or 8 year contract”? Nah. Enjoy the season. Issue a QO, then take the draft pick.
Take a shot of whiskey for every deeply analytical “not an ace” hot take.
I tore a handful of grass out and flipped it up in the air to test the wind. It was blowing out of the east. Therefore: not an ace.
10 cent.
It’s not a hot take to say a guy who spent his entire career (save for one year) pitching behind a cy young winner and another multi year all star isn’t an ace. The brewers are consistently one of the better defensive teams in all of baseball while having the benefit of being in a very weak division. Meanwhile this Mets team is very weak defensively and the NL east is one of the more competitive divisions with a team making the NLCS in every year since 2019 except for last year, and winning 3 World Series that same span. The Nl central has zero rings and only 2 NLCS appearances in that same time frame.
Bottom line. The brewers absolutely fleeced that moron sterns and Peralta will revert back to his career as a number 3 starter with the Mets.
In other news, water remains wet.
… and always level, too.
This is good news, the Phillies will be looking for a potential starter next year depending on the outlook of Wheeler’s future.
It takes two to tango. Plenty of time to hammer out an extension if both sides want it. It can happen rather quickly.
But the Mets likely want a discount to sign before he throws a pitch for them and Freddy has already said he wants to adjust to a new city and team before making any decisions. The Mets gave up two top 100 prospects that weren’t going to contribute to the team based on their timelines. Williams was superfluous to A.J Ewing and Sproat showed serious regression last season. If Peralta pitches well, nobody will outbid Cohen. No reason for concern at this time.
“Nobody will outbid Cohen” cos they’re all looking ahead to the inevitable lockout come December 2026.
Eh, I think the potential for a lockout is somewhat overblown. It would be extremely detrimental and shortsighted for either side to allow that to happen. Further, the Mets have $150M and $70M luxury tax payroll coming off the books in 2027 and 2028, respectively. Any changes to the cap rules are highly unlikely to impact their ability to sign whoever they want, with the caveat that Peralta has to want to remain a Met of course.
Plus, their patience on the farm is beginning to reap rewards. Cohen had a goal of winning a World Series within 5 years of his purchase. That may not have happened, but one only needs to look to the Dodgers to see all hope is not lost. Guggenheim bought the team in 2012 and they went on to win the World Series in 2020, taking 8 seasons under that ownership group. It takes a long time to build a farm system. Cohen’s plan has always been to spend a lot early and hope to win while eventually augmenting the roster with young talent over time.
Very overblown. But the Dodger-hating small-market apologists want it to happen so bad that they can’t stop obsessing over it.
No need to trade for a guy first if your plan is to just outbid everyone for him.
Goose:
Except they weren’t going to sign a free agent this offseason and have to pay $200M for an imperfect and inconsistent pitcher like, say, Dylan Cease. A trade was the best path for now, and the fact that he’s only making $8M this season makes his acquisition quite ideal. Even if they don’t re-sign him, they’ll still have a top 10 farm system, so they’ll take their pick, add it to their treasure trove and move on without a second thought.
1. That draft pick will be in the 130’s because they are luxury tax payors
2. Your original statement was “If Peralta pitches well, nobody will outbid Cohen.” That could also be true if they don’t trade for him first. Steve Cohen can sign whoever he wants.
Let’s not overstate this AJ Ewing thing as if he’s knocking on the door. The crowd of dregs that the Mets added to the Syracuse roster indicates that Ewing is starting the season in AA. And there’s no way to know how long a player will take to go from there to sticking at the major league level. He’s a year behind where Williams was in level, and Williams still isn’t in the majors or on a 40-man roster.
We can’t compare him to Carson Benge’s progression because he doesn’t have the HR power that Benge has. And if we’re comparing him to Williams, then, look at how long the Mets kept Williams in AA last year despite excellent results. Perhaps that is an indication of how the Mets prefer to handle bats that are shy in HRs.
So much for Miken31 saying it was guaranteed he signs an extension LOL
The most interesting part of the article was the mention of December 1 as the day the collective bargaining agreement ends and that also being a kind of deadline to sign a top tier free agent. This off-season could be very interesting if all the heavy lifting needs to be done in November.
Been Following The Mets Since 1969…
Have A Few Thoughts We’d Like To Run By You Folks…
We Seem To Be Currently Talking About “Years” As Opposed To “Dollars”
When Peralta Is Talking About “7-8 Years” We Think We’re Talking About A Guaranteed $200 Million (7@30 Or 8@25) Payday To Set Him Up For Life…
Peralta Was Born In 1996, Should Be 30 Years Old This Year & We Doubt He’s Going To Get Offered A Contract That Runs Until 2033/34…
Stearns Likes Short Term Contracts & Cohen Has Big Buck$…
What IF, Mets Offer 5 Years @ $200 Million Total… With Plenty Of Deferred $…
Maybe Give Peralta 5 Years @ $30 Million + 5 Years @ $10 Million (Deferred)…
Nice “Income Stream” For A Player…
Now, We Could Argue About Whether Peralta (Or Any Player) Is Worth This Type Of Money, But We Don’t Doubt That These Types Of Numbers Are What We Are Seeing In This Current Marketplace…
Additionally, We Are Aware Of The Current Contract Situations Of The Mets’ Starting Pitchers… Peralta & Peterson Are In Their “Walk Years” & Holmes Has An Opt-Out…
As Well As Understanding The Mets’ “Top Heavy” Minor League Pipeline… A Lot Of Talent That Could Be Ready To Contribute In 2026-28…
Don’t Ask Us If Anything Makes Sense (Anymore) But We Thought We’d Run This Up The Flagpole & Perhaps Get An Intelligent Comment Or Two…
Can Any Fans Of “The Brew Crew” Comment On Peralta, Outside Of His Stats ?
Is He A “Stopper” Who Can Get You A Win Following A 4 Game Losing Streak ??
Is He A “Big Game” Pitcher ???
All The Best To Everyone &
Let’s “Play Ball” ⚾
When they’re assessing how much to offer him, I’m sure that the whole Stopper and Big Game Pitcher thing will have absolutely zero to do with it.
They need to lock up McLean now to a team friendly deal while they have time
Peralta is young enough and has some track record of being a TOR pitcher. I really hope Sterns isn’t trying to play cheap here. Make him a reasonable offer for something like five or six years and let him lead the youth contingent.
If they pan out, he’s a source of wisdom and could even be traded for other resources. If the youth train doesn’t leave the station, he solidifies part of the rotation. Either way, he’s a valuable commodity and worth more than a QO pick.
Offering him 5 or 6 years won’t change the equation here. The very reason this article exists is that he’s looking for 7 – 8 years and the Mets are not interested in going that long. He’s not going to lower his demands while he still has a year left to free agency.
Yup, he wants 7 years. And will he get that, even if he has a great season this year? I don’t think he will. He’s just not in that category.
Impossible to say what will or won’t happen until we know the terms of the next CBA. That said, if he repeats what he did last year, some team might be willing to go that extra couple of years. And we can’t just look at Peralta in a vacuum.
Consider this: The Mets have Peterson and Holmes (opt-out) leaving for free agency at the end of the year. If they go to the WS this year, can they realistically let 60% of the rotation that took them there go, including the ace, rather than bring Peralta back to extend the run?