Headlines

  • Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski
  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers Interested In John Lackey

By Zachary Links | July 28, 2014 at 11:18pm CDT

The Dodgers are investigating every top available starter, including Red Sox veteran John Lackey, sources tell Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports (on Twitter).  Of course, the Dodgers are also looking into the likes of Cole Hamels, David Price, and Lackey’s teammate, Jon Lester.

Lackey’s Tommy John surgery in 2012 triggered a $500K option for the 2015 season due to an injury clause in his contract, so he could provide a boost for the Dodgers beyond this season.  In 21 starts this season, Lackey owns a 3.60 ERA with 7.6 K/9 and 2.1 BB/9.  Meanwhile, Lackey’s xFIP of 3.35 also suggests that he’s throwing the ball well.

Rosenthal reported earlier today that Boston is getting “hit hard” on both Lester and Lackey.  Lester would likely require a hefty trade package including a top prospect but Lackey represents a more affordable option for teams chatting with the Red Sox.

Share 19 Retweet 74 Send via email22

Boston Red Sox Los Angeles Dodgers John Lackey

Central Notes: Pirates, Ruggiano, Pirates, Bastardo
Main
Edes On Lester, Miller, Kemp, Lackey
View Comments (96)
Post a Comment

96 Comments

  1. Eric 27

    11 years ago

    Hey Zach – seems like Lackey could command more than first meets the eye considering his 2015 salary of $500,000. Lester is a 2 month rental. Lackey helps this year and next.

    Reply
  2. Bob George

    11 years ago

    IMO Lackey’s 500k option for next season makes him worth more on the trade market than a rental like Lester.

    Reply
    • ehaz

      11 years ago

      I agree – having Lackey available at the minimum next year makes him as valuable as Shark IMO.

      Reply
      • Anthony Hughes

        11 years ago

        John Lackey is not fetching a top 10 prospect in all of baseball. I don’t care what his cost is. He’s old, relatively speaking. It’s just not going to happen. That’s not to say he isn’t valuable. He is. Especially at 500K next season.

        Reply
        • Bleed_Orange

          11 years ago

          Lackey is also not the difference maker Lester is, Lackey is more of a quality innings eater whereas Lester is a front of the rotation starter.

          Reply
          • Anthony Hughes

            11 years ago

            Yep. Although I think Lackey’s postseason career (3.03 ERA in 104 IP) adds to his value a bit.

            Reply
      • Bleed_Orange

        11 years ago

        Probably not that valuable considering that 1) Shark is better pitcher. 2) Lackey has his ring and money so he could retire rather than playing for 500K. 3) Shark will be receiving a qualifying offer whereas a team would be foolish to offer a qualifying offer to Lacky after next season.

        Lackey is probably worth about what Bud Noris was worth last year. Some low level guys with some upside and some AAA guys who need a change of scenery.

        Reply
    • Dustin Smith

      11 years ago

      Except the fact he said he’ll consider retiring unless he gets an extension makes him a rental without the same success as a Lester. Basically if he goes to the dodgers, you aren’t getting pederson/urias/seager. The dodgers could get similar production from someone else for a much cheaper price

      Reply
      • Jake2008

        11 years ago

        No, in fact, he didn’t say that. It’s been speculated he would do that. He’s never said that.

        Reply
  3. SierraM363

    11 years ago

    I’m sure we will only trade Lackey if we get really good return because of that cheap salary.

    Reply
  4. Eric D.

    11 years ago

    Lester and Lackey for Pederson and Urias

    Reply
    • Sam Uel.

      11 years ago

      As a Dodger fan hell no. While we would get rid of our rotation woes, we would be getting rid of our future as well.

      Reply
      • Puig Power

        11 years ago

        Rotation woes?

        Reply
        • BlueSkyLA

          11 years ago

          I think he must mean in the number 4 & 5 slots. Solving that problem is worth the future, isn’t it?

          Reply
          • Matt He.

            11 years ago

            Beckett is a solid #4.

            Reply
            • Anthony Hughes

              11 years ago

              The issue there is that Beckett is now pitching with a partially torn hip labrum and there are also cysts there. He may not be able to give the Dodgers much for the rest of the season. His start tomorrow is going to be crucial.

              Reply
            • BlueSkyLA

              11 years ago

              Not lately. His last two starts were awful, and Beckett himself says that he doesn’t feel like he’s the kind of pitcher who can go more than six innings. I hope he can make a recovery tonight (especially since I will be at the game) but I don’t think we know yet.

              Reply
              • Travis Ducsay

                11 years ago

                Same here. Regardless of the performance at least we will be walking away with that sweet sweet Scully Microphone.

                Reply
    • koufaxblue

      11 years ago

      Don’t even go there!!

      Reply
    • koufaxblue

      11 years ago

      Why would you even consider such a bad move.

      Reply
    • Doggy Jigger

      11 years ago

      eric what are you thinking. It should be more like lester lackey and bogaerts for urias and pederson

      Reply
      • Brady 2

        11 years ago

        jokes right?

        Reply
      • Dustin Smith

        11 years ago

        Still no

        Reply
    • Cdiaz

      11 years ago

      lester , lackey & middlebrooks , and boagerts for kemp, urias & perderson.

      Reply
      • Doggy Jigger

        11 years ago

        middlebrooks is wrose than uribe. Urias and pederson can fetch giancarlo stanton alone

        Reply
        • Cdiaz

          11 years ago

          middlebrooks he’s actually pretty good , he just been on the DL for a while. but giancarlo is only hitting for power he strikes out way too much. but he is the right handed bat we need. but urias and pederson would need to include other prospects aswell .

          Reply
          • Doggy Jigger

            11 years ago

            of course. maybe pederson,urias,lee,holmes

            Reply
            • Cdiaz

              11 years ago

              i wouldn’t trade holmes he’s gonna probably be a number #2 starter one day i prefer giving some other prospects dominguez lee reed ect .

              Reply
              • Matt He.

                11 years ago

                Holmes isn’t even tradable until next june.

                Reply
        • Bleed_Orange

          11 years ago

          Urias alone cannot fetch Stanton… swing and a miss

          Reply
      • Jeff Scott

        11 years ago

        How about… Lester and Uehara to NY for Brett Gardner, Derek Jeter, and a PTBNL?

        Reply
  5. MeowMeow

    11 years ago

    Trading Lackey feels like a mistake, unless we’re pre-emptively conceding 2015? No Lackey and questionable Lester would mean a 2015 rotation of, what? Workman, Webster, De La Rosa, Renaudo, Buchholz? That’s a good way to have back-to-back losing seasons. (Or based on how Clay’s been faring… idk, Owens?) A lot of talent there but hardly a playoff team’s rotation.

    Reply
    • Christopher Henderson

      11 years ago

      Agreed. Buchholz would open the season as the veteran & opening day starter. yuck

      Reply
    • Alex Andreopoulos

      11 years ago

      Agreed. Unless the Sox have their….. sox blown off…. they should probably think about retaining Lackey for 2015. Unless of course the Sox FO thinks they can make multiple huge SP splashes in free agency, which is not a gamble I’d be comfortable with.

      Reply
    • Kevin 23

      11 years ago

      You do realize that the Red Sox are rebuilding and will not be a competitive team for at least 2 or 3 years.

      Reply
      • hediouspb

        11 years ago

        wrong. they are in a good position to be competitive now. what they need to do is trade everyone who is gone next year. trade lester (because he isn’t going to give a huge home town discount) and then sign him at a good number, say 5/$115). pick up lackey’s option and then offer him a $19.5 mil one year extension (making it 2/$20).

        then decide who you see long term as ss, 3b, starters and trade a boatload of what you have left to get a big righthanded bat. it would be worthwhile to get stanton for 6 top prospects after making the trades because they will have a huge 40 man roster crunch.

        instant contender.

        Reply
        • rct 2

          11 years ago

          Is this sarcasm? That’s a lot of moves.

          Reply
          • hediouspb

            11 years ago

            trading useful pieces that you aren’t going to have beyond this year just makes sense. if lester wants closer to market value get what you can for him.

            they have a ton of pitching prospects and hitters who can hit for average. they don’t have power.

            rotation of lester, lackey, bucholz, and two of de la rosa, webster, ranaudo, workman or owens with dubront long relief.

            starters- napoli, pedroia, boagarts, victerino, jbj, vasquez, ortiz… middlebrooks or marrero…

            bench- holt, nava, herrera, swihart or a backup catcher.

            trade-

            stanton to boston for:

            two of de la rosa, webster, ranaudo, workman or owens

            betts, lavarnway, cechini, brentz

            Reply
            • Voice_of_Reason

              11 years ago

              “trade- stanton to boston for:

              two of de la rosa, webster, ranaudo, workman or owens
              betts, lavarnway, cechini, brentz”

              No way FLA does that deal. They’d want at least four of those for Stanton. More realistically they will want de la rosa, owens, and boggarts.

              Reply
              • hediouspb

                11 years ago

                i think you missed that it was two of the pitchers and all 4 of the others.

                Reply
            • rct 2

              11 years ago

              Again, that’s an insane amount of variables and also, I’m not sure I’m understanding the Stanton trade. Is it two guys from the first group and all of the guys from the second (ie five total guys)?

              Reply
      • MeowMeow

        11 years ago

        …no?

        Reply
      • Jake2008

        11 years ago

        Was that the case after 2012, too?

        Reply
  6. Guest 3677

    11 years ago

    Haven’t they had him once already? Oh wait, that other one was referred to as “Aaron Harrang”

    Reply
  7. Christopher Henderson

    11 years ago

    Red Sox front office content with up to 3 years of no playoffs. They really want to dismantle the whole team

    Reply
    • Gumby65

      11 years ago

      Nah, they are just out to get feelers. Never hurts.

      Reply
      • BlueSkyLA

        11 years ago

        Not even one year after winning the series, Boston fans figure mangement is about to sell them down the river. That’s one tough baseball town.

        Reply
        • Brady 2

          11 years ago

          i’m a long time Red Sox and I don’t mind it I’d rather make a 3 year adjustment then patch up a broken team. We already have one of the best farm systems if we can add more and keep some of them and then deal some others for cornerstone established players.

          Reply
    • Jeff Scott

      11 years ago

      They aren’t dismantling the team. It only seems that way because they have A LOT of very tradeable players right now in a seller’s market so lots of chatter. What will be interesting is who will actually go,they just have a ton of options. As a Sox fan, this is surprisingly exciting/fascinating actually. Even if they just hoard prospects for now they can always flip them to another team in the off-season.

      Reply
      • Brady 2

        11 years ago

        Someone who gets it thank you

        Reply
  8. nightmarerec0n

    11 years ago

    Lackey makes PERFECT sense for the Pirates. A contender for 2014-2015 that can’t afford a whole lot and need a pitcher with Cole’s injury. A play-off rotation of Cole,Lackey,Burnett,Tallion, and (insert mediocre 5th starter).

    Reply
    • Alex Henry

      11 years ago

      They would never get both Burnett and Lackey. Also no way can you could think Taillon would recovery so well from TJ and be in the rotation. You are missing both Morton and Locke who are clearly cogs of the rotation for the foreseeable future.

      Reply
  9. Gumby65

    11 years ago

    My “serious” guess is Dodgers make a play for Bartolo Colon; shouldn’t cost as much as the Rodeo Drive set but give them some quality starts just the same.

    Reply
    • calamityfrancis

      11 years ago

      I think so too. Colon won’t cost very much in terms of prospects and I don’t see his $11 million price tag killing them next season even if he fell off the map.

      Reply
  10. Doggy Jigger

    11 years ago

    Koji Lester Ranouldo for KEmp and pederson?

    Reply
    • Brady 2

      11 years ago

      kemp is not coming to boston

      Reply
    • MeowMeow

      11 years ago

      Good ol’ Ranouldo

      Reply
      • Devern Hansack

        11 years ago

        He didn’t look too good in the World Cup this year. I’d rather trade for Messi.

        Reply
        • MeowMeow

          11 years ago

          Tim Howard should be the catcher of the future.

          Reply
          • Doggy Jigger

            11 years ago

            put michael bradley as closer

            Reply
    • Matt He.

      11 years ago

      no. Dodgers aren’t trading both Kemp and Pederson.

      Reply
  11. Brady 2

    11 years ago

    Lackey will command more

    Reply
  12. BoSoXaddict

    11 years ago

    Sox cannot trade both, it’s not gonna happen.

    Reply
    • Jim Charbonneau

      11 years ago

      Red Sox need starters. Trading either Lester, or Lackey makes no sense. Those two are the only reliable starters in the rotation.

      Reply
      • Cdiaz

        11 years ago

        are they even going somewhere this year lol

        Reply
        • Brady 2

          11 years ago

          no exactly why there trading pieces off

          Reply
          • Cdiaz

            11 years ago

            yup the dodgers farm system is pretty strong as it sits they can pretty much get any player they want but the future seems brighter than the present

            Reply
        • Jim Charbonneau

          11 years ago

          This year is lost, but a rotation of rookies will go nowhere next year.

          Reply
      • M.Kit

        11 years ago

        Have you seen their farm system? They don’t “need” starters. Soon enough, its going to be getting really crowded. Of course it doesn’t mean they should just trade off lester and lackey for nothing (i’m skeptical in trading lackey)

        Reply
        • Jeff Scott

          11 years ago

          @Jim: Call me naive, but I think the Red Sox are going to sign Lester in the off-season even if they trade him. In fact, that might be exactly why they haven’t worked out an extension. If he had signed one they couldn’t even think about what they could receive from a team who is willing to deal a lot for 3 months of him. I really think when all is said and done the Red Sox are going to pay him. Hope they pull it off.

          Reply
  13. Oliver Sudden

    11 years ago

    You can’t get enough pitching. And if you’re rich and stupid, you can always throw money away, and if that fails, you can talk up your prospects.

    Reply
  14. Jaysfan1994 2

    11 years ago

    Why do people expect Lackey to play for a league minimum 500k next year? He’s just not going to play next year.

    Reply
    • Travis2014

      11 years ago

      You know that seems plausible, but I have a really hard time thinking Lackey is that big of a ____. I mean seriously I just can’t fathom a guy retiring all because of something like that when he signed the contract. The owners would have a cow and it just wouldn’t be a pretty situation. I would imagine the Red Sox could have a legitimate legal case against him if he were to retire.

      Also I think he has stated before he won’t retire. Though I’m sure any team will quickly sign him to a 2/16mil contract and feel it is just as good as the league minimum for 2015.(that extension scenario is what is commonly thrown out there)

      Reply
  15. Jaysfan1994 2

    11 years ago

    Do the Dodgers really want to create the most toxic clubhouse in all of baseball? You got Puig fighting Gonzalez while Gonzo texts the owner, Lackey/Lester & Beckett eating Fried Chicken and playing video games, you got Hanley Ramirez kicking balls into left field and jogging after them, you got Matt Kemp complaining about not playing center field when he’s an atrocious defensive fielder. Am I missing anyone?

    Reply
    • Cdiaz

      11 years ago

      Kershaw and a.j playing pingpong lol

      Reply
      • Jaysfan1994 2

        11 years ago

        I think I missed Eithier fighting Mattingly.

        Reply
    • Jesus Gutierrez

      11 years ago

      huh

      Reply
    • Mackster248

      11 years ago

      Not sure what fantasy world you’re referring to, but that’s quite a fairy tale you’re telling there.

      Reply
    • Gumby65

      11 years ago

      Just say no to drugs.

      Reply
    • rct 2

      11 years ago

      You forgot Dee Brown taking night classes in Medieval Philosphy, Carl Crawford thinking Bel Biv Devoe was the pinnacle of New Jack Swing while Juan Uribe swears it’s Boyz II Men, and Zack Grienke being embroiled in a hot race with JP Howell for head of the Los Angeles County Model Train Association Board of Directors. That clubhouse is just nuts.

      Reply
      • Jaysfan1994 2

        11 years ago

        Hilarious, why don’t people look up these events I described and see they’ve actually happened? The Dodgers don’t have a very good clubhouse.

        Reply
        • rct 2

          11 years ago

          I think everyone’s point is that no one cares if Josh Beckett is eating fried chicken. They’re non-issues. The Dodgers have the best record in the NL.

          Also, half of your examples are from years ago when the players were on other teams.

          Reply
          • Jaysfan1994 2

            11 years ago

            So suddenly people in their 30’s change their personality? I don’t think so, the only thing that keeps a clubhouse together is winning, and mark my word if and when the Dodgers fail to make the playoffs with these said players you’re going to have a mess on your hands because the clubhouse cancers always come out when a team is out of contention.

            Reply
  16. Lefty_Orioles_Fan

    11 years ago

    Ahhh, the Dodgers… trying to become the Red Sox West!
    Now, that the Red Sox might be out of it, do they get to do another Salary purge?
    I just SMH at all this. Dodger ownership giving financial relief to those in need.
    Wait, what?

    Reply
    • MB923

      11 years ago

      I thought they were the Yankees West already?

      Reply
  17. MB923

    11 years ago

    Is there anyone the Dodgers are Not interested in?

    Reply
  18. Converge241

    11 years ago

    Lackey has made noise about wanting an extension to override the cheap option year. Hes hinted at ” retiring”. Very unhappy at it, it being the deal he agreed to.

    Anyway Dodgers would be inheriting that which could relegate him to a rental

    Reply
  19. dc21892

    11 years ago

    I wouldn’t want to see them trade Lackey. It’s almost throwing in the towel for next season too unless they have big plans in the offseason.

    Reply
    • Scott Berlin

      11 years ago

      As cheap as the Red Six have been I doubt they do much on the free agent market. They have enough prospects to make trades so maybe they go that route.

      Reply
  20. DarthMurph

    11 years ago

    The Sox would really need to be blown away to trade Lackey. He’s worth top prospects by token of his salary. He might not be an ace, but a free number 2 starter has a ton of value.

    Reply
    • Dustin Smith

      11 years ago

      He’s not really a number 2 anymore either. More of a 3/4. Plus there has been rumors he wants an extension or he’ll retire and he doesn’t have quite the same recent success of a Lester/Price/Hammels. Boston could get a nice return for him, but you aren’t getting a Pederson/Urias/Seager for him. The option is nice, but not if he retires after this yr or requires a 15 mil extension.

      Reply
      • DarthMurph

        11 years ago

        Lackey isn’t having a bad year and he’s a battle tested playoff performer. For 500k, an offer would have to be pretty good for the Red Sox to pass up. It’s not like they’re going to take 2015 off.

        I too have concerns about Lackey’s option, but a 2/16 type deal would still be a bargain with the way he’s been performing.

        Reply
        • Bleed_Orange

          11 years ago

          I honestly see Lackey as very comparable to Bud Norris last year… You would think he has more value than he really does.

          Reply
          • DarthMurph

            11 years ago

            Then they’re not going to trade him.

            Reply
            • Bleed_Orange

              11 years ago

              They probably won’t he’s worth more to them than probably any team that would trade from him. Might as well extend him for 2 years and have him stabilize the rotation as the Sox rebuild.

              Reply
  21. Mark Kelevara

    11 years ago

    I’m assuming Ned is hoping he turns out like Ricky Nolasco did for us last season?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Recent

    Orioles Select Luis Vázquez

    Diamondbacks Place Justin Martínez On IL With UCL Sprain

    Rangers To Sign Craig Kimbrel To Minor League Deal

    Akil Baddoo Accepts Outright Assignment With Tigers

    Dodgers Recall Matt Sauer, DFA José Ureña

    Chris Stratton Elects Free Agency

    Aaron Nola To Be Shut Down For Two Weeks With Stress Reaction In Rib Cage

    Mets Sign Travis Jankowski To Minor League Deal

    Poll: Can Drew Rasmussen Keep Pitching Like An Ace?

    White Sox Designate Bryse Wilson For Assignment

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version