Headlines

  • Cubs Promote Cade Horton
  • Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base
  • Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton
  • Mariners Claim Leody Taveras
  • Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach
  • A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

MLB Imposes International Signing Ban On Red Sox, Voids Five Contracts

By Steve Adams | July 1, 2016 at 10:57am CDT

The Red Sox have been banned from signing international amateurs that are subject to MLB’s bonus pools for the 2016-17 signing period, reports Yahoo’s Jeff Passan. Furthermore, five prospects that the Sox signed during the 2015-16 signing period have been declared free agents that are free to sign with new teams beginning tomorrow, though each player will retain the initial bonus money he received from Boston. Per Passan’s report, right-hander Cesar Gonzalez, outfielders Albert Guiamaro and Simon Muzziotti, and infielders Antonio Pinero and Eduardo Torrealba. The first $300K of their bonuses will not count toward their new teams’ international bonus pools in the upcoming period, he adds.

The punishment handed down stems from Boston’s usage of “package deals” to circumvent restrictions that were placed upon them for the 2015-16 international signing period. Boston’s signing of Yoan Moncada near the end of the 2014-15 signing period meant that the team was easily into the top penalty bracket for international signings and was supposed to bar the team from signing international amateurs (players under the age of 23 and/or with fewer than five years of pro experience) for the next two signing periods. However, Boston circumvented that limitation by “packaging” more premium prospects with lesser prospects; that is, paying $300K for multiple prospects that employ the same trainers/agents and then allowing the players’ representatives to divide the lion’s share of the collective sums to the top prospect of the bunch, with the lesser prospects receiving a smaller portion of the money.

While some will note that “package” signings have been around for quite some time, this is the first instance in which a club that was restricted by the league under the new penalties has directly utilized this tactic to sign high-caliber talent by rather devious means. As Baseball America’s Ben Badler recently laid out, previous “package deals” haven’t expressly been utilized to avoid penalization from the league. Rather, examples of package deals have been to convince a trainer/agent to allow his player to sign with a team by agreeing to take on a lesser prospect or to convince a player to sign with a team by also signing the player’s friend or sibling. Badler does note that there have been instances of a team signing a player in one international signing period as a means of enticing his trainer into an agreement for a different player in the following signing period, but those haven’t been brokered by teams that are already under the maximum penalty bracket.

Stepping back and looking at this from the perspective of players on the upcoming international market, the punishment from MLB likely voids a fair number of agreements that were already in place between Boston and prospects out of Latin America. Badler recently reported that Venezuelan Roimer Bolivar, whom he had ranked as the No. 31 prospect on this year’s market, was expected to sign with Boston. Beyond that, the Sox were expected to sign shortstops Erik Pena and Raymond Mora as well as catchers Christian Longa and Wilfredo Astudillo. Now, that quintet of players (and presumably several more unreported teenagers) will be on the lookout for new clubs with which to sign. While they’ll undoubtedly find teams interested in paying them, their market may be more limited, as many clubs that aren’t planning to exceed their pool have likely already come close to maxing out their allotted spending limit with advance agreements.

As for the Red Sox, they’ll still be able to sign pool-exempt international players (e.g. Yulieski Gurriel, Jose Miguel Fernandez, Yadiel Hernandez), but such players will be the only types of free agents able to be signed to contracts until next July 2, when the 2017-18 international signing period kicks off.

Share 180 Retweet 25 Send via email0

2016-17 International Prospects Boston Red Sox Newsstand

AL Central Notes: Twins, Davidson, Indians, Fulmer
Main
Twins Option Byung Ho Park To Triple-A
View Comments (91)
Post a Comment

91 Comments

  1. angrypoptart99

    9 years ago

    Rekt

    Reply
    • joefriday1948

      9 years ago

      I agree and appreciate your foresight, insight and hindsight!

      Reply
  2. rjfeeman24

    9 years ago

    Mike maroth caused this to happen. Should the red sox look at firing

    Reply
  3. Ken M.

    9 years ago

    Cheaters next prosper.

    Reply
    • bosox55

      9 years ago

      Standard practice in baseball, MLB could catch every team if the wanted to investigate deep enough.

      Reply
      • double

        9 years ago

        It’s not standard practice. Fewer than a third of the teams are restricted and the Red Sox were the only one to sign top 30 players to contracts way below market value in order to skirt the rules.

        What is standard practice is paying agents for multiple players. A team might give an agent $125k for five players and the agent, after keeping his cut, will spread it around.

        Reply
        • seamaholic 2

          9 years ago

          Yes this. Package dealing produces some very odd results that raise all sorts of red flags. Notably highly valued prospects signing for exactly $300,000 when they’re worth much more than that. It’s not common at all, although it has happened in the past.

          Reply
      • Mark 21

        9 years ago

        Just what you would expect a Sox fan to say.

        Reply
        • Niekro

          9 years ago

          Seems to be the calling card of Patriots fans too everyone else was doing it but only we got caught.

          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          There’s very weird parallels between the rabid “my team will never do anything wrong” fandom mentality and like, people who lived under Hitler in Germany who were just “doing what they were told”. Is it like a variation of Stockholm Syndrome? I don’t know. But the cases of fans being like “haha yeah we did that, oops” are always far outweighed by the ones trying to justify their team’s or players illegal moves. Just own it already.

          Reply
      • thebighurt619

        9 years ago

        Yourteamcheats- mlb version.

        Waiver wire claiming division rival players to cheat

        Reply
      • One Fan

        9 years ago

        Sorry bosox is not standard practice at all. Red Sox are the only team who ever did this while under the max penalty prohibition of $300k minimum. They did it to cheat. Period.

        Reply
        • bigjonliljon

          9 years ago

          Should have called the cardinals for advice on how to hack MLB computers. Never would get caught and if so… Never would see a punishment.

          Reply
        • allbostonproteamsarenumb1

          9 years ago

          I have inside knowledge that at least 9 other teams have done the exact same thing.

          Reply
      • dorfmac

        9 years ago

        Classic Boston fan response… “It’s standard practice”, “everyone does it” – yet Boston seems to be the only team getting caught. Is it an anti-Boston conspiracy that the entire NFL and MLB are a part of, or is it just Boston being Boston?

        hint: it’s not the conspiracy.

        Reply
        • 2asandab

          9 years ago

          So you are saying a large portion of the country isn’t referring to the senator from MA as pochahontas? – i would say most red staters have little love for New England’s obnoxious better than you attitudes. No?

          Reply
      • oodood 2

        9 years ago

        Well that’s is just wrong. The Red Sox cheated the system. Do you really think mlb decided to pick on one of the golden boy franchises and let all the other teams off the hook? Seriously?

        Reply
  4. Jizz Chasholm

    9 years ago

    Wait, if they didn’t cheat like a couple Red Sox fans were saying, why would they get punished?

    Reply
    • taxman

      9 years ago

      C-O-N-SPIRACY!!

      Reply
  5. Outlaws12

    9 years ago

    Ha ha

    Reply
  6. jdubs346

    9 years ago

    LOL, feel it Boston

    Reply
  7. thebighurt619

    9 years ago

    Wow thats a hefty ban. So they cant sign international free agents nor youngster that would count against the signing period like moncada and espinoza did, but they can sign guys who are exempt from counting against the signing period? Damn.

    Reply
  8. krillin

    9 years ago

    It’s not their fault… They shouldn’t get punished…

    Jk, it’s totally their fault and they deserve the consequences.

    Reply
  9. EndinStealth

    9 years ago

    While I’m sure cheating happens all the time, and doesn’t get caught, how the heck did they think they’d get away with this? It was blatantly obvious what they were doing!

    Reply
    • Lanidrac

      9 years ago

      I can only guess that they foolishly thought MLB wouldn’t punish them since they were using a technical loophole rather than blatantly breaking the rule.

      Reply
  10. Ray Ray

    9 years ago

    Will the five prospects retain the same Rule 5 draft eligibility time frame? If so, I could see them getting hurt by this process. Wouldn’t you rather sign a guy that you can keep off the 40 man for 1 more year?

    Reply
    • ThatGuy 2

      9 years ago

      If they’re subsequently signed, yes. If they’re out of baseball for this year, that may affect the rule 5 eligibility

      Reply
    • double

      9 years ago

      Not necessarily. These guys have been developed for the last year. It’s no different than trading for a minor leaguer a year after he is drafted.

      Reply
      • natesp4

        9 years ago

        Exactly. These guys have been playing in the DSL for the Red Sox teams down there. They’re on the exact same timeline as before.

        Reply
    • YourDaddy

      9 years ago

      That’s a great question. My guess is that because they get to keep their signing bonuses, they keep their service time.

      Reply
      • ndiamond2017

        9 years ago

        DSL time does not add to service time

        Reply
  11. Ray Ray

    9 years ago

    Will teams like the Dodgers and Yankees be allowed to sign these guys for $600k now since the first $300k is paid by Boston or are they still subject to the same spending limit?

    Reply
    • BucSox

      9 years ago

      The way it is described here yes.

      Reply
    • YourDaddy

      9 years ago

      In another article, it spelled out that all teams that are currently restricted from signing cannot sign any of the guys affected by this ban. So no, the Dodgers, etc… can’t sign them.

      Reply
  12. Ray Ray

    9 years ago

    Does Boston retain the tradable international bonus money slots? If so, can they still trade them?

    Reply
  13. dresman92

    9 years ago

    And the Cardinals get what for hacking?

    Reply
    • thebighurt619

      9 years ago

      Banned from using computers for a year? Back to the old pencil and paper and type writers

      Reply
    • double

      9 years ago

      Whatever the penalty is it’ll be worse. The Red Sox lost a player (or two) who might crack their top 30 in 2-3 years and maybe be a hot prospect in 4-5. If the Cardinals lose a first round pick you’re talking about a guy who probably would be one of their top 10-15 right away.

      Reply
      • tim815

        9 years ago

        The Red Sox get the IFA perp walk. The agreements they came to, they can’t fulfill. If the Commish goes nuclear on a draft class, like this, it could be epic.

        Not pro-Sawks or Cardinals. Just wanting to see what ‘justice’ looks like.

        Reply
      • BucSox

        9 years ago

        For the Cards I have read everything from fine to multiple first rounders.

        Reply
        • tim815

          9 years ago

          I didn’t read this punishment for the Red Sox being on the way. Nobody knows how Manfred will punish benefiting from corporate espionage.

          Reply
    • tim815

      9 years ago

      Ding ding

      Reply
    • Lanidrac

      9 years ago

      The guy who did it was fired and is facing prison time. There is still no evidence that the organization as a whole or anyone among the top brass knew anything about it, so there’s no reason to punish them. Although, perhaps they’ll get a fine since they did unknowingly benefit from it.

      Reply
      • rogerwilco

        9 years ago

        Actually, I don’t think they benefited from it at all. They released the data that was accessed and it was all basically old news. Perhaps that’s the saddest thing of all. One guy is facing criminal charges and the organization is facing sanctions and they didn’t really gain anything from the incident.

        Reply
  14. hozie007

    9 years ago

    Does it really matter? These aren’t top prospects and there are no real top prospects emerging right now either that would impact an MLB team. A year from now, it will be back to business as usual.

    Reply
    • natesp4

      9 years ago

      Two of them are very good prospects. That said, they were 16 year old prospects when they signed so they have probably a 90% to bust. It’s all relative

      Reply
      • staypuft

        9 years ago

        Red Sox have plenty of prospects and plenty of money. This would hurt a small market team, but Boston can basically carry on in other ways right now.

        Reply
        • natesp4

          9 years ago

          Absolutely agree. Just pointing out that just because people haven’t heard of this kids doesn’t mean they aren’t quality prospects. They’re quality 16 year old prospects, which is a much different asset than quality 20 year old prospects. But valuable non the less

          Reply
  15. chound

    9 years ago

    I think its time to investigate the Bruins and Celtics!!! Wreck that whole city!

    Reply
  16. onlyringsmatter

    9 years ago

    Still waiting for Cards hacking penalty

    Reply
    • tim815

      9 years ago

      Grab a Snickers.

      Reply
    • stl_cards16 2

      9 years ago

      Dude. They are waiting on the trial to be wrapped up. As part of Correa’s plea deal, he’ll likely have to walk through everything that happened. It would do no good for MLB to rush to judgment before gathering all possible facts..
      That said, of the facts/evidence that has come out so far, you’ll be disappointed in the punishment.

      Reply
      • ray_derek

        9 years ago

        Cardinal fans are the best!

        Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          9 years ago

          lol true, they never let you down

          Reply
        • stl_cards16 2

          9 years ago

          So what would you consider appropriate punishment when it comes down?

          Since you seem to think I only have this opinion since I’m a Cardinals fan, I’m sure you’ve been following the case. Please enlighten us on the subject.

          Reply
        • stl_cards16 2

          9 years ago

          Says the guy who never adds any substance to a conversation. You’ve been here long enough to know me. If I’m entering a conversation, I don’t bring homer opinions. There’s plenty of things the Cardinals have done I don’t agree with.

          Reply
      • Astros2333

        9 years ago

        Correa will probably sell someone out to lighten up his sentence. Though it is annoying that the trial has been postponed twice already.

        Reply
      • donniebaseball

        9 years ago

        Stl_cards16 is completely correct. Manfred has been pretty transparent about this as well. It makes sense to wait until as many facts as possible are revealed.

        Reply
    • YourDaddy

      9 years ago

      I don’t think it’s going to be much. From keeping track of the trial it’s pretty evident from the testimony they have released that he acted alone and the Cardinals didn’t gain competitive advantage from the hack. They are still going to get a penalty, and it’s going to sound like alot to the uninformed, something like a half million dollars, but it’s not going to hurt them.

      Reply
      • Priggs89

        9 years ago

        “From keeping track of the trial it’s pretty evident from the testimony they have released that he acted alone and the Cardinals didn’t gain competitive advantage from the hack.”

        You REALLY believe that? Why would he waste his time hacking the system if it wasn’t to gain any sort of advantage? That makes absolutely no sense. I’ll give you that he MAYBE acted alone, but I have my doubts.

        Reply
  17. chieftoto

    9 years ago

    They got (Red) socked right in the go-nads!

    Reply
  18. DEK59

    9 years ago

    Oh no!! Now they’re going to whine and cry and throw tantrums until they get their way… Wait they do that now

    Reply
    • krillin

      9 years ago

      Like the Patriots and Tom Brady?

      Reply
      • ray_derek

        9 years ago

        How great would it be if Tom Brady was president?

        Reply
        • Bobby Sweet

          9 years ago

          Roger Goodell was usurp him and remind us all that he has absolute power.

          Reply
        • Bobby Sweet

          9 years ago

          Goodell would* usurp him, sorry about that.

          Reply
  19. hojostache

    9 years ago

    BOS is a very competitive city….first the Pats go and violate a bunch of league rules, so of course the Sox need to do it because they aren’t going to be outdone by a team in their own back yard!

    Reply
  20. User 4245925809

    9 years ago

    One way to fix it.. Roll it into the Rule 4 draft, get rid of those compensation picks for the fictitious small market teams and everything is then fair to all.

    Raise up (way up) the amount of slot teams can pay to say.. 1st rounds 1-3 draft choices and then? Go back to drafting to round 50.

    Reply
    • atomicfront

      9 years ago

      That is what the league wants. The players union just has to agree. I suspect they will in exchange for something else.

      Reply
      • Bobby Sweet

        9 years ago

        No marijuana testing.

        Reply
    • stl_cards16 2

      9 years ago

      Then the big markets can start sharing that $$ with the small markets like every other professional league.

      But the big market owners don’t want to play on a level playing field. They’d rather keep that money to themselves and hand out token draft picks to make it look like they care.

      Reply
  21. natesp4

    9 years ago

    Seems a little light. All they did is take away the players who the Red Sox wouldn’t have been able to get without rule breaking. Should have extended the signing restrictions an extra year at the least.

    Reply
    • YourDaddy

      9 years ago

      They did. The Red Sox won’t be able to sign any players this year as well as losing those from last year. Overall they lose the 5 from last year and at least that many this year.

      Reply
      • natesp4

        9 years ago

        The Red Sox signed about 33 international free agents last year and are losing 5. This year they sign none, but would have been under the microscope by the MLB anyways so likely wouldn’t have gotten anything substantial. Now the year after when their spending restrictions are up, they are going to blow past the limit again and more than make up for the minimal talent they would have gotten these past two years.
        What I’m saying is the MLB should have extended the signing restrictions an extra year. As it stands right now, the Sox didn’t lose anything. They took a chance and got caught. It’s like they robbed a store, the cops made them return the money, and they’re free to go

        Reply
  22. wtfareyouthinking

    9 years ago

    And yet the Cardinals go unpunished for hacking into another team’s proprietary information,

    Reply
  23. thecoffinnail

    9 years ago

    I wonder if a team that went over their pool in the last signing period ( like the Dodgers) could sign any of those 5 for an amount over $300k. They were technically from last year’s IFA class or if they are strictly being put in this year’s class. It should be interesting to see the next collective bargaining agreement.

    Reply
  24. bigjonliljon

    9 years ago

    Can we get a scouting report on the players that are now free agents please? Would be great

    Reply
    • stymeedone

      9 years ago

      Sure, can see it now: Joe Gomez, age 16, good speed, bats rh. Raw skills at everything, prefers PlayStation to Xbox. Hobbies: learning a second language.

      Reply
      • krillin

        9 years ago

        That was good lol

        Reply
    • stl_cards16 2

      9 years ago

      Baseball America is your ticket to July 2 free agents.

      Reply
  25. RickEO

    9 years ago

    Sox are so stacked. Who gives a crap

    Reply
    • Pasquale Salvatore

      9 years ago

      Not in the pitching department!!

      Reply
  26. kyredsox17

    9 years ago

    In this world, you try to take advantage of loop holes. This one is now closed, oh well.

    Reply
    • Francisco

      9 years ago

      They have enough money and will probably go on spending spree with non-exempt international players now.

      Reply
  27. SixFlagsMagicPadres

    9 years ago

    Too bad for the Red Sox. Maybe they’ll learn a lesson from this.

    Reply
  28. mike156

    9 years ago

    That’s a substantive penalty. Manfred may be drawing away from the Selig legacy.

    Reply
  29. dirtywater433

    9 years ago

    The Sox “cheated” a broken system to begin with.

    Somehow the cardinals keep getting competitive balance first round picks for being “a small market”

    Yet the Sox are trying to find any loophole to try and get around this broken system. This is why a draft is coming. This system is simply flawed.

    Reply
    • legit1213

      9 years ago

      Small market? Competitive balance means just that. The point is to not penalize success. STL never get high draft picks because they’re not incompetent enough with player development. They have to do more with less, as far as raw talent goes. But orgs like CIN, CWS, and SD get unlimited chances to fail their top picks.

      Reply
  30. mulcahy01

    9 years ago

    Thank god. As a sox fan, they can now focus on getting better starting pitching. I was getting worried they were more interested in breaking the rules then trying to fix the woeful rotation.

    Reply
  31. thepaddyswagonexperience

    9 years ago

    Such a Boston thing. It’s not going to stop them from buying their way back into the fold, but as long as another Boston franchise gets an asterisk thrown next to its name, there’s some satisfaction in that. And give the Cardinals credit…. they studied the Patriots pretty closely, too.

    Reply
  32. fixshorts

    9 years ago

    Ok, Next up, let’s re-test Papi for steroids, you know he’s using them. If ARod was having this kind of year there would be an uproar. Why Papi seems to get a pass is beyond me. He STILL never explained his roid usage from the report like he said he would.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

  • Top Stories
  • Recent

Cubs Promote Cade Horton

Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base

Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton

Mariners Claim Leody Taveras

Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach

A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery

Blue Jays Sign Spencer Turnbull

Blue Jays Sign José Ureña

Ross Stripling Retires

Rangers Place Leody Taveras On Outright Waivers

Triston Casas Likely To Miss Entire 2025 Season Due To Knee Surgery

Orioles Recall Coby Mayo

Dodgers Recall Hyeseong Kim

Triston Casas Suffers “Significant Knee Injury”

Angels Place Mike Trout On 10-Day Injured List

Rangers Option Jake Burger

Tigers Designate Kenta Maeda For Assignment

Reds Option Alexis Diaz

Orioles Move Charlie Morton To Bullpen

Astros To Activate Lance McCullers Jr. This Weekend

AL West Notes: Trout, Wesneski, Kirby, Gilbert

Jose Altuve Exits Due To Hamstring Tightness

Clay Holmes Discusses Free Agency

Danny Duffy Signs With Mexican League’s Piratas de Campeche

Red Sox Place Romy Gonzalez On 10-Day Injured List

Padres Notes: Cronenworth, Cease, King, Suarez

Cubs Promote Cade Horton

Tigers Place Casey Mize On 15-Day Injured List

Orioles Outright Matt Bowman To Triple-A

Dodgers Sign Lou Trivino To Minors Deal

ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

Latest Rumors & News

Latest Rumors & News

  • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
  • Nolan Arenado Rumors
  • Dylan Cease Rumors
  • Luis Robert Rumors
  • Marcus Stroman Rumors

 

Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

MLBTR Features

MLBTR Features

  • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
  • Front Office Originals
  • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
  • MLBTR Podcast
  • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
  • 2025 Arbitration Projections
  • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
  • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
  • Contract Tracker
  • Transaction Tracker
  • Extension Tracker
  • Agency Database
  • MLBTR On Twitter
  • MLBTR On Facebook
  • Team Facebook Pages
  • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

Rumors By Team

  • Angels Rumors
  • Astros Rumors
  • Athletics Rumors
  • Blue Jays Rumors
  • Braves Rumors
  • Brewers Rumors
  • Cardinals Rumors
  • Cubs Rumors
  • Diamondbacks Rumors
  • Dodgers Rumors
  • Giants Rumors
  • Guardians Rumors
  • Mariners Rumors
  • Marlins Rumors
  • Mets Rumors
  • Nationals Rumors
  • Orioles Rumors
  • Padres Rumors
  • Phillies Rumors
  • Pirates Rumors
  • Rangers Rumors
  • Rays Rumors
  • Red Sox Rumors
  • Reds Rumors
  • Rockies Rumors
  • Royals Rumors
  • Tigers Rumors
  • Twins Rumors
  • White Sox Rumors
  • Yankees Rumors

ad: 160x600_MLB

Navigation

  • Sitemap
  • Archives
  • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

MLBTR INFO

  • Advertise
  • About
  • Commenting Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Connect

  • Contact Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feed

MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

hide arrows scroll to top

Register

Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version