Headlines

  • Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow
  • Astros To Promote Brice Matthews
  • Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers
  • Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help
  • Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays
  • Yankees Release DJ LeMahieu
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Jake Arrieta On Declining Cubs’ Offer

By Jeff Todd | May 2, 2018 at 12:12pm CDT

In a chat with Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun-Times, Phillies hurler Jake Arrieta verified prior reports that Cubs president of baseball operations Theo Epstein made a last-ditch offer before the team agreed to terms with Yu Darvish.

Arrieta, who ultimately signed with the Philadelphia organization later in the winter, tells Wittenmyer that he does not really believe that Epstein expected to get a deal done when he called with a “take it or leave it” proposal of six years and $120MM. That statement reflects previous reporting on the perceptions of both sides to that conversation.

While he emphasized that he harbors no ill will at all toward Epstein or the Cubs organization, Arrieta says that approach was a non-starter, even though he had yet to receive a formal contract offer to that point:

“[T]hey weren’t willing to negotiate at all, and that wasn’t acceptable for me,” Arrieta tells Wittenmyer. “I bet on myself just like I have my entire career and ended up getting a good deal.”

Arrieta, of course, is referring to the three-year, $75MM guarantee he took down from the Phils. He obviously preferred the higher average annual value but also emphasized in his comments that he expects to play longer than that in Philadelphia. Arrieta’s deal includes a provision that allows the Phillies to add on two years at a salary of $20MM or more (depending upon escalators) per season.

The veteran hurler certainly exuded confidence in his chat with Wittenmyer, which is well worth a full read. Among other things, he discussed his leadership efforts with the Phillies and flatly rejected the idea that there’s any concern with how he’ll age — or how his velocity will hold up — over the course of his new contract. To the contrary, Arrieta suggests his new organization will receive an exceptional player. “There’s not many like me,” he tells Wittenmyer. “… I don’t care what the situation is, I bet on myself to get the job done.”

Share 0 Retweet 6 Send via email0

Chicago Cubs Philadelphia Phillies Jake Arrieta

Indians Designate Matt Belisle
Main
Athletics Select Contract Of Brett Anderson
View Comments (63)
Post a Comment

63 Comments

  1. Hen1CHC

    7 years ago

    Not a chance his next few years will be worth 6/120$ he and Boras were foolish not to instantly take that from Chicago.

    7
    Reply
    • GoCubsGo

      7 years ago

      It technically can be a 5/$125 deal if it gets completely maxed out. He’s betting on himself to be able to do that. I personally don’t think he will get there, but he’s always been a bet on himself kind of guy, so it makes sense for him.

      2
      Reply
      • joshua.barron1

        7 years ago

        Folks, the darkish contract guarantees $126mm/6 years with incentives to push the contract to a max of $150mm. Bottom line is Arrieta left $51mm of guaranteed money on the table as well as reduced the ceiling of his earnings by $25mm with that decision, albeit over 1-3 fewer seasons.

        Even if he wins the cy young every year for the next 5 years, he still would have been better off taking the cubs offer. Fact

        Reply
        • Jbigz12

          7 years ago

          Uhhhhh no. He still will likely get a deal in FA In the next 3 years. It’s hard to project and 6/120 is certainly better than 3/75 by most estimations but if Arrieta is a cy young quality pitcher for 3 years he’ll end up with more than 6/120 in total. If he’s the pitcher he has been in the past he’d have no problem getting 3/60+ again. That’s a sizable gamble for an older pitcher though.

          Reply
        • joshua.barron1

          7 years ago

          Sorry but are you aware that the Phillies hold a team option over him for years 4 and 5 if he pitches well? If he pitches well he won’t be a free agent. If he pitches poorly, he gets his $75mm and then goes to the scrap heap.

          A gamble should allow you to come ahead, not just break even if EVERYTHING goes right

          Reply
        • jobusrum9

          7 years ago

          I’m not sure you read the article.
          Right there in the middle of the article in black and white it specifically says how much he will get from the Phillies if they excerxise his options. It’s $20mil per year for 2 years at a minimum. If he pitches well as the op suggested then those options years are worth even more.
          From here all we need is simple math skills.
          3/75 + 1/20 + 1/20= 5/115
          5/115 + (escalators) $5mil per season based on starts, $5mil per season based on Cy Young voting equals a grand total of 5/135
          5/135>6/120
          Idk what the exact numbers are that he needs to hit for starts or where he needs to finish in cy young voting to get those escalators to kick in, but I’m willing to bet if he’s pitching well enough in years 4 and 5 to come close to those escalators he and the Phillies would probably just work out a contract extension so they can find a way to reduce his aav and tack on another year or 2.

          Reply
        • joshua.barron1

          7 years ago

          Ok so you have your simple math skills down, but not simple reading skills. My first sentence reads “Folks, the darvish contract guarantees $126mm/6 years with incentives to push the contract to a max of $150mm”

          If he meets ALL of the incentives to max out at 5/135 (I thought the contract maxed out at 5/125, but maybe I’m wrong), then he almost certainly would have met the same criteria to max out at 6/150 with the Cubs offer. So lets compare guaranteed dollars vs. incentives.

          Cubs offer: 6/126 guaranteed, maxes out at 6/150

          Phillies offer: 3/75 guaranteed, maxes out at 5/135

          In what world is $51mm less guaranteed and a $15mm lower earnings ceiling (granted, over 1-3 fewer years) not just an EQUAL contract offer, but a BETTER offer for a 32 year old pitcher?

          If you pass on 6/126, you damn well better have 4/110 or 3/100 (GUARANTEED) out there because the contract he signed with the Phillies is significantly more team friendly than the one the Cubs were offering.

          *mic drop*

          Reply
    • Tmandolfan

      7 years ago

      It isn’t like the Cubs are getting great value from Darvish either. The fact is that teams who sign pitchers for $100mil or more very rarely do.

      Reply
      • Caseys.Partner

        7 years ago

        “The fact is that teams who sign pitchers for $100mil or more very rarely do.”

        Actually you have that backwards. It’s that next tier down, the Ian Kennedy, James Shields, Ricky Nolasco type of pitcher who delivers nothing or almost nothing for the four or five years he signs for.

        If you aren’t going for the Arrieta or higher than the next place to shop is the one year deal guys looking for a rebound.

        Reply
      • Jockstrapper

        7 years ago

        Comment in September, doofus.

        Reply
      • wgfinley

        7 years ago

        Like Lester right?

        1
        Reply
    • bigjonliljon

      7 years ago

      As a cubs fan…. so glad he did not

      2
      Reply
      • CubsRebsSaints

        7 years ago

        I preferred Arrieta yo Darvish the entire time. Especially @ 3 years! Theo n Jed can say they wanted Darvish all along.
        The truth is, they weren’t willing to battle with Boras and go over 25m per season and up I 175-200m dollar contract. If they had known they could keep Arrieta for 3 years and 75 million?!!? They would jumped all over having only a 3 year commitment to age 35.

        1
        Reply
        • themed

          7 years ago

          Yeah Darvish deal is really looking silly for the cubs now

          Reply
        • Priggs89

          7 years ago

          “If they had known they could keep Arrieta for 3 years and 75 million?!!? They would jumped all over having only a 3 year commitment to age 35.“

          Maybe that’s why teams tend to negotiate with agents instead of saying, “Here’s our only offer. Take it or leave it.” Quite the strategy.

          Reply
      • themed

        7 years ago

        Really? You like the Darvish signing better huh?

        Reply
    • justinept

      7 years ago

      3-$75. Maxes out at 5-$125. If he pitches well, then the options will get picked up and he’ll outearn the Cubs offer.

      And if the Phils don’t pick up the options, he’ll need a 3-$45 deal to equal the Cubs offer. Comp that to the 2-$36 deal Lackey received in 2016, and it’s not that far fetched that he should, at a minimum, be able to match the total money offered by the Cubs in time.

      2
      Reply
  2. carlos15

    7 years ago

    The Darvish deal is already a huge mistake

    1
    Reply
    • anthony rizzo

      7 years ago

      No it’s not. Darvish’s poor start can be attributable entirely to the horrible weather the Cubs have had to play through. It’s way to early to say it’s a mistake to sign yu.

      1
      Reply
      • themed

        7 years ago

        How was the weather today? Face dumb huge mistake

        Reply
  3. elicopner

    7 years ago

    Mistake by Arrieta to not take the 120m and okay for a championship caliber team. Good move by the phils, they’re paying for the 3 years and will drop him and his “leadership” and hubris quicker than a hummingbirds wings on a nice summers day.

    2
    Reply
  4. Z-A 2

    7 years ago

    Sorry but the Phil’s will decline after 3 years. Not going to willfully pay a 35/36 yr old pitcher 20M per season. He may get some offers but expect them to be much much less. James Shields is that cautionary tale.

    1
    Reply
    • TheMick

      7 years ago

      The difference you’re missing in that comparison is Shields pitched 700+ more innings than Arrieta at the time they entered free agency.

      Reply
  5. Dave 32

    7 years ago

    Stay in school kids, actually attend your classes and learn things. This is a prime example of someone who went to college for baseball, probably didn’t learn much and does not understand the value of money.

    If you’re somehow of the idea that 15 million dollars matters more than 60 million dollars, you don’t understand some basic financial concepts. Yes he took a higher AAV in the short term, but you have to be an idiot to believe that somehow you’re going to be the guy who is suddenly in demand at age 34+ as a pitcher in the post-PED era of baseball. It’ll be even worse for a guy at 34 than 31. His agent lucked out though, getting that better short-term deal knowing he ain’t gonna get a long term one later.

    If there was 6/120 on the table, Arietta was a fool for not taking it and his agent should be ashamed. Especially since it was the Cubs, who would maybe be upset but not that upset if he gets on a decline in his later years since he got them their World Series. (see also: the unending support for a clearly in decline Adam Wainright from Cardinals fans despite last year clearly being in a spot where the team needed to move on from him).

    3
    Reply
    • jleve618

      7 years ago

      You are forgetting the time value of money.

      1
      Reply
  6. dugdog83

    7 years ago

    His arm will be shot in 3 years and his hand will only have one ring on it.

    Reply
    • Caseys.Partner

      7 years ago

      If Arrieta doesn’t opt out he’ll have a second ring.

      Reply
      • camdenyards46

        7 years ago

        What

        Reply
        • camdenyards46

          7 years ago

          Are you saying he will get a ring with the Phillies

          Reply
        • GabeOfThrones

          7 years ago

          Or can opt out of a team option?

          Reply
  7. dm038

    7 years ago

    He is just trying to justify why he took less money and made it look like his idea. He blew it by not taking cubs offer

    1
    Reply
    • Dark_Knight

      7 years ago

      He really didn’t. Even if he’s a 1 year guy after 3 years he’s still probably looking at AAVs of $10-15 million. If he signs 3 1 year $15 million contracts he’s matched what was offered

      Reply
      • Cam

        7 years ago

        I was going to say one in he hand, two in the bush. But in reality, he needs to justify an extra contract or 3 just to break even.

        He had the money up front, but decided to gamble, with the reward being exactly what he would have been guaranteed initially.

        Same theory as someone offering me 20 bucks up front for an old but working TV, then me saying no, I’ll take 10 up front, and flip a coin for the remaining 10.

        Reply
  8. dewssox79

    7 years ago

    the yu darvish “blame it on the rain” tune is so dumb. he isnt that great of a pitcher.

    Reply
    • themed

      7 years ago

      He’s awful

      Reply
      • Cam

        7 years ago

        5 starts into the contract and Cubs fans are already inconsolable.

        I guess that Heyward contract has conditioned y’all to expect the worst.

        2
        Reply
        • Djones246890

          7 years ago

          I doubt he’s a Cubs fan, but generally speaking, Cubs fans are extremely hard to please, and expect the team to win all 162 games.

          They watch each game as if it’s the final game of the World Series, and they watch baseball games like each game is as important as a football game — which only has 16 games per year.

          Folks, it’s baseball. It’s a long/grinding season. You’re NOT going to win every single game.

          1
          Reply
        • Cubbie75

          7 years ago

          DJones it’s not just Cubs fans. I follow other other teams and fans are like that in general, especially the ones who take to social media the most. Lots of Cubs fans are patient but what’s to mouth off about that?

          Reply
  9. wgfinley

    7 years ago

    Definitely wish Jake the best, he will always be a World Champion Cub but I think the Cubs made the right move. Jake can be a dominating pitcher and then he loses his release point (often in the same game and even inning he was once dominating) and then the wheels fall off in a hurry. There’s no room for mistakes with his mechanics which leads me to believe it’s not sustainable long-term.

    Reply
    • ludafish

      7 years ago

      You are right about his release point. My crappy (although better lately) Marlins beat him up last night and you can see him get rattled a bit. I still think Philly made the right move getting him as aside from Nola they don’t have much. But Philly is on the up and up and they have soooooo much money they can spend this off-season. In a year or two he can be the 3rd or 4th starter on one of the top teams in baseball. On the same note the Cubs are young and also cash rich so…..should be interesting.

      Reply
    • themed

      7 years ago

      Nope cubs made a huge mistake letting him get away. Huge

      Reply
      • Cam

        7 years ago

        They offered him 6/120, when the next best offer looks to have been 3/75.

        What more did you expect the Cubs to do? Give him Theos first born?

        Reply
        • Jbigz12

          7 years ago

          maybe not present the offer as take it or leave it. Most guys don’t like to be rubbed the wrong way even though that offer was certainly fair. Maybe he could’ve came in a little lower and Jake and co. could’ve negotiated his way up to 6/120 if it would’ve even taken that much. it’s not all about what you’re offering it’s how it’s offered.

          1
          Reply
        • its_happening

          7 years ago

          Theo gave his first and second born to Heyward.

          Reply
        • Priggs89

          7 years ago

          Oh how easily that gets ignored… Maybe money isn’t the only factor? Maybe coming in with an elitist attitude turns some people off? Maybe not everybody worships the ground the Cubs front office walks on? Just a thought.

          Reply
  10. CubsRebsSaints

    7 years ago

    So we can agree that the Cubs and Arrieta were both foolish for not continuing their relationship?? “If it ain’t broke”

    Reply
  11. CubsRebsSaints

    7 years ago

    Darvish is garbage. He’s getting bashed around again! For someone to have “such an Arsenal” he sure doesn’t play like he’s equipped! In other news, Maddon leading Rizzo off was simply a move to jump start the slugging first baseman. Such a move was made easier by his tendency to homer from the leadoff spot. It’s almost like clockwork! In small samples of course. Maddon knows this and will keep it in his back pocket as a jump starter tool for Big Riz, and the rest of the team as well!
    He’s about to get hot.
    Darvish still stinks. Go Cubs Go!

    Reply
  12. mike156

    7 years ago

    He’s entitled to bet on himself. His problem is that he doesn’t realize that if he’s the kind of good that would have earned him a big contract in that Year 6, the Phillies would have bought out the more valuable years 4 and 5 for $40M. If he’s not, he’s got $75M for three years, and then he’s looking for a big deal for his age 35, 36, and 37 years. This year’s FA market would lead one to wonder whether a 35 year old, maybe 2 WAR player could get a 3 year deal at an AAV of $15M. So, he’s not really betting on himself–he’s betting on that 5th year being good enough to score one more big deal.

    Reply
  13. Tom E. Snyder

    7 years ago

    If Jack had gone to the Astros he could pitch 5 years and get better with age. (see Verlander, Justin; Morton, Charlie)

    Reply
  14. slowcurve

    7 years ago

    Arrieta seems like a bit of a tool, no?

    3
    Reply
    • lucienbel

      7 years ago

      Agreed.

      2
      Reply
    • themed

      7 years ago

      No he is not. Just a very good pitcher that the cubs will kick themselves for years for letting him get away

      Reply
    • Priggs89

      7 years ago

      Par for the course for Jake.

      Reply
  15. dewssox79

    7 years ago

    I thought Darvish was bad because of bad weather….seems nice today out here! and still sucks!

    Reply
    • themed

      7 years ago

      No he’s just bad and enormously over paid.

      Reply
      • dewssox79

        7 years ago

        agreed

        Reply
  16. themed

    7 years ago

    The cubs actually do better trying to tank than they do recognizing free agent talent. Heyward now Darvish

    Reply
  17. rememberthecoop

    7 years ago

    Unless he’s back on the juice, I doubt he will ever be anywhere near the player he was in his Cy Young season, but man what a year that was. The second half of that season was as good as any in history. Every time he went to the mound, I expected a no-hitter.

    Reply
  18. jorge78

    7 years ago

    Theo didn’t do so well with massive FA contracts in Boston and now Chicago. But he wins titles. OK cool…..

    Reply
  19. Cubbie Steve

    7 years ago

    Bet on himself all he wants. The Cubs fixed him and made him successful.

    His delivery—throwing across his body—does not make it easy, mechanically, for his arm to hold up or for him to maintain command. We already saw a dip in velocity and a complete loss of control at times in the past.

    Reply
  20. Djones246890

    7 years ago

    God, this guy is such a little drama queen. You bet on yourself and LOST….big time. This guy’s problem has always been that big ego-filled balloon head can’t fit through the Holland Tunnel.

    Reply
    • Priggs89

      7 years ago

      Funny how his ego is now a giant issue when he’s not with the Cubs. He has always come off as a tool to most non-Cubs fans, but every time it got mentioned, Cubs fans felt the need to talk about how great of a guy he was and how he was such a hard worker and blah blah blah. Funny how quickly things change.

      Reply
  21. anson's cap

    7 years ago

    Doesn’t anyone remember Arrieta opening negotiations with, “No hometown discounts” and the Cubs staff rescuing his career from the scrapheap?

    All of the numbers discussed here is more money than any person and their family members can sanely spend in their lifetimes, if managed properly.

    Arrieta’s comments only rationalize his egotistic and ungrateful actions.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow

    Astros To Promote Brice Matthews

    Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers

    Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help

    Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays

    Yankees Release DJ LeMahieu

    Trevor Williams To Undergo UCL Surgery

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Rangers Option Josh Jung

    Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

    Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

    Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin

    Recent

    Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow

    Poll: Which Teams Should Make The Biggest Push For Jarren Duran?

    MLB Finalizes Home Run Derby Field

    Astros To Promote Brice Matthews

    Giants Outright Sergio Alcántara

    Joe Coleman Passes Away

    Dodgers Outright CJ Alexander

    Trade Deadline Outlook: New York Yankees

    Clarke Schmidt To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Trade Deadline Outlook: Atlanta Braves

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version