Headlines

  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Hanley Ramirez Not Under Federal Investigation

By Jeff Todd | June 24, 2018 at 3:59pm CDT

SUNDAY: Ramirez is not under federal investigation and has not been connected to any drug ring, Shelley Murphy and Evan Allen of the Boston Globe report. Rather, Ramirez’s friend – who was arrested in April while transporting fentanyl from New York to Massachusetts – mentioned the player’s name “to get the cops off his back, which didn’t work,” the friend’s attorney informed Murphy and Allen.

Ramirez’s agent, Adam Katz, responded Sunday, saying (via Bob Nightengale of USA Today, on Twitter): “The reporting on Hanley’s involvement in this matter was reckless and irresponsible. It’s unfortunate that one careless, inaccurate story can generate such widespread negative and damaging coverage. Hanley is pleased to be absolved from wrongdoing and having any involvement in this matter.”

FRIDAY: Long-time major-leaguer Hanley Ramirez is “being eyed” in relation to a broader federal and state drug investigation, Michele McPhee of ABC News and Newsweek reports on Twitter. The precise nature of the Ramirez’s involvement is not yet entirely clear; at present, it’s not even apparent whether he is viewed as a potential suspect of any kind by authorities, and he has not been charged with any crimes.

Ramirez’s agent, Adam Katz, issued a statement to media members including Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic (Twitter link). He asserts that “Hanley has no knowledge of any of the allegations contained in this media report and he is not aware of any investigation.”

McPhee, a veteran crime reporter, explained in an appearance on Boston’s 98.5 The Sports Hub (audio link) that a man (not Ramirez) was found by police to be carrying in his vehicle a large volume of drugs — specifically, fentanyl and crack cocaine. She continued to report that the man, who was later arrested and charged, “claimed that one of the items found in the vehicle belonged to Hanley Ramirez and then FaceTimed [Ramirez] in front of police.”

The suspect is evidently also linked to a broader Lawrence, Massachusetts fentanyl ring that has been the subject of a significant, ongoing investigation. Tom Cleary of Heavy.com dug up some related criminal complaints that seem to line up with the reporting. None of those documents mention Ramirez.

Additionally, McPhee stated in the above-linked radio interview that the incident “sparked, obviously, some contact between Ramirez and law enforcement who were working on this case.” That said, the nature and timing of that contact is not known. And there’s no real suggestion to this point that Ramirez is a subject of ongoing investigation himself.

Ramirez is currently a free agent. He opened the year with the Red Sox but was designated for assignment in late May and later released. When Ramirez was sent packing by the Boston organization, it came as a bit of a surprise. While he was slumping at the time, he had started the season well and seemed worthy of a longer leash, particularly given his hefty salary.

When the Sox decided on the move, president of baseball operations Dave Dombrowski and manager Alex Cora gave a somewhat unusual account of the decisionmaking process. With rather atypical willingness to discuss the decision in detail, both said that Cora had suggested it’d be preferable to part with Ramirez despite plans to move another player off of the roster.

McPhee says that the above-referenced incident “coordinated with the the timing of [Ramirez’s] release from the Red Sox.” The team, though, maintains that it had no knowledge of any investigation at the time, as Alex Speier of the Boston Globe tweets. The decision on Ramirez was based purely on baseball considerations, per the organization.

It’s important to note, too, that it’s still not clear whether the dates really do line up in the manner hinted at. While Ramirez was technically released on June 1st, release waivers were requested on May 30th. And he was designated for assignment — the truly consequential roster move — on May 25th. A press release indicates that the arrest of the suspect occurred on June 6th; if the car stop occurred at a prior time, the date is unreported at this point.

It has also been a topic of some note in recent weeks that Ramirez has remained unsigned for an extended stretch. Because he was released, the Red Sox are obligated to him for the $15MM or that was left on his contract for the present season. Any other club could have (and still can) acquire Ramirez’s services for the only the league-minimum rate of pay. Today’s reporting could, in theory, provide a reason for Ramirez’s still-ongoing free agency. But there’s no direct evidence for that proposition and there are certainly other conceivable explanations for the fact that he has not yet joined a new team.

Ramirez, 34, is certainly not your average major leaguer. He has played 14 seasons at the game’s highest level, earning about $160MM along the way. Early in his career, it seemed Ramirez might be on a Hall-of-Fame trajectory, though he has not been consistently productive more recently. Ramirez has generated some controversy at times for eccentric behavior, though that has never been a significant concern during periods when he has produced at the plate. What impact, if any, this still-developing situation may have on his career moving forward remains to be seen.

Share 0 Retweet 10 Send via email0

Newsstand Hanley Ramirez

AL Notes: Beltre, Rays, Astros, K. Tucker, BoSox, JDM
Main
Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Braves, Bucs, Mariners, Mets, Twins, Nats, O’s, Padres
View Comments (110)
Post a Comment

110 Comments

  1. GareBear

    7 years ago

    Just plain weird

    Reply
    • joshua.barron1

      7 years ago

      You knew there had to be something up

      1
      Reply
      • realgone2

        7 years ago

        Exactly. They just got rid of him. Also, now that he is a free agent no one has signed him and not even rumors of him signing anywhere.

        1
        Reply
        • iverbure

          7 years ago

          They got rid of him because he was due like 22 mil next year if he reached a certain amount of PAs. That isn’t weird at all.

          Now nobody picking him up at the league min might have a better case for weird. But time and time again we’ve seen teams shy away from old DH types so is it really all that weird.

          6
          Reply
        • marijuasher

          7 years ago

          Who is going to sign him? Plays only 1st or DH. And where would he want to play? Baltimore or KC?

          Plenty of reasons why he’s not playing right now.

          1
          Reply
        • gomerhodge71

          7 years ago

          Orioles don’t need another overpriced, non-productive first baseman.

          Reply
        • stansfield123

          7 years ago

          Has he been trying to get picked up?

          Reply
      • teddy 3

        7 years ago

        Read a few lines and now you know it all.

        Reply
      • majorflaw

        7 years ago

        “You knew there had to be something up.”

        Hmmmm, this hasn’t aged well.

        Reply
  2. Familia1931

    7 years ago

    What in the world? I’m at a loss for words. What do I say next? Should I just not say anything?

    1
    Reply
    • stubby66

      7 years ago

      How about sorry from everyone that assumed the worst of him just because his skills diminished or would that be too humbling.

      Reply
  3. Pops

    7 years ago

    And now we know why the Orioles Front Office is interested in Hanley. Or should I say interested in what Hanley has to offer.

    Reply
  4. xabial

    7 years ago

    Someone tell Hanley to sell the movie rights

    2
    Reply
  5. zwaves

    7 years ago

    Have him try on the glove.

    1
    Reply
    • fuchholz

      7 years ago

      You win! You always do. Thats why i come up here

      Reply
  6. Caseys.Partner

    7 years ago

    Hanley was seen this evening trying some Korean take out in Boston.

    2
    Reply
    • jbaker3170

      7 years ago

      Try harder to stay relevant sweetheart

      11
      Reply
    • cecildawg

      7 years ago

      And there was herb growing only two blocks away.

      Reply
  7. agentx

    7 years ago

    Very little surprises me anymore about pro athletes, even reports of potential criminal ties like these.

    That said, the part where the suspect “”FaceTimed [Ramirez] in front of police” definitely caught me off guard. What an idiot move!!

    Reply
    • jimmyz

      7 years ago

      That caught me off guard too but for different reasons. Since when is someone in the process of being arrested for driving a car full of drugs allowed to use their personal phone to contact someone else?

      3
      Reply
      • darkstar61

        7 years ago

        The “in front of the police” part kind of answers that – they allegedly allowed him to make the call to widen the suspect pool, and possibly gain evidence against said wider pool

        Reply
      • Jeff Todd

        7 years ago

        “That’s not mine.”

        “Whose is it?”

        “Hanley Ramirez.”

        “Wut.”

        “Watch I’ll FaceTime him.”

        “Okay go for it.”

        —

        Couldn’t resist. Purely made up. But hey, if a suspect is potentially handing you evidence, why not?

        5
        Reply
        • Connorsoxfan

          7 years ago

          My thoughts exactly.

          2
          Reply
    • Jodi

      7 years ago

      You believe that crap? If that was remotely true Ramirez would definitely be under more than a cloud of suspicion.
      This article was so poorly written I’m not inclined to believe much of what it contains. I am no Boston or Ramirez fan, I just believe in fairness & honest reporting. Whoever wrote that article needs to stop trying to be Tolstoy & just write the facts, stop tripping over their words.
      There is ZERO proof that he did anything criminal or is involved in anything criminal at this point. To suggest something otherwise is irresponsible. MLB would be on him like flies on fresh turd in the hot sun if he was wrapped up in criminal activities. They love flexing their MLB policing/playing God muscles on their players, even before they have been charged or gone through the court system.

      Boston thinks they are taking the the ring this year. They are clearing the payroll to pick up some pieces at the trade deadline to fill in the holes so they can buy the team they think can buy them a World Series win. It’s what Boston & the Yankmes do. Buy rings.

      Reply
  8. SG

    7 years ago

    It makes “no sense” that the authorities would “tip off” Hanley Ramirez, via a “news reporter”, that they were investigating him.

    Hanley could obviously destroy any incriminating material with this information.

    If the authorities had anything they would just have simply arrested Hanley and kept it quiet until they did. They certainly wouldn’t have tipped off a reporter.

    I think the public has the right to know the source of this reporter’s information and for the reporter to prove this report as she will likely face a defamation lawsuit if she can’t and nothing actually comes of this bizarre report.

    .

    3
    Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      7 years ago

      The reporter in this case was very clear about what she was and wasn’t reporting. She did not say that Ramirez is a target, let alone that he has been charged, or that the Red Sox knew about it when he was DFA’ed.

      Regarding the team, as I noted in the post, it’s not even clear that the timing does line up. (Not that it’d be conclusive proof if it did.) But certainly the club (or the reporter) could have learned of this other than from the authorities.

      As far as the idea of tipping off Ramirez, if he was somehow involved in any nefarious activities, I’m sure he’d already know that his conspirators were facing charges.

      5
      Reply
      • NotaGM

        7 years ago

        That’s where I agree. He was not caught with the 435.grams….but his name was mentioned.

        2
        Reply
      • Polish Hammer

        7 years ago

        Jeff you are right, the reporter did nothing wrong in her publicizing exactly what went down and what his involvement is in the case.

        1
        Reply
      • stubby66

        7 years ago

        Once again it’s the fact that someone is first in reporting it instead of someone having the right facts. My guess she probably knew the whole but what the heck let’s make assumptions in around about way and watch it go viral maybe I get more followers!!!!

        2
        Reply
        • Jeff Todd

          7 years ago

          This is potentially a valid criticism of her reporting. Hard to assess without knowing the full situation, of course, but running with one item can be fraught with problems.

          Reply
    • thecoffinnail

      7 years ago

      George B, Why are people so quick to throw out the 1st Amendment these days? I am sure you have said “This is a free country” at some point in your life. Start chipping away at the very first thing the Founding Fathers put into the Constitution and you will see how long you will be able to say that.

      1
      Reply
  9. Bocephus

    7 years ago

    Along the same lines, I was watching ESPN a couple of weeks ago and it was reported in the Dominican Republic by an unnamed source that Jose Ramirez(not Hanley) was going to be suspended for a failed drug test. This report and claim was actually denied by Ramirez, his Agent, and the Indians FO. MadDog actually had something quick to say about it on his show about it, so who knows.

    2
    Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      7 years ago

      We never covered that at all since there was no evident basis for it whatsoever. This report is different in many regards, so I went ahead and wrote a (very carefully worded) post.

      2
      Reply
      • Bocephus

        7 years ago

        Makes one wonder since the details don’t come out until after the player is suspended. There indeed might be something here with the Indians Ramirez after all. Aren’t there circumstances where the player is appealing his failed test and nothing can be released till after the results of the appeal?

        3
        Reply
        • Jeff Todd

          7 years ago

          Typically it’s crickets from league/team/player/agent until a suspension is handed out post-appeal. In this case, the Indians said they were informed by MLB that there was nothing going on at all.

          1
          Reply
        • Steven Chinwood

          7 years ago

          Anybody wonder about this guys sudden surge?

          2
          Reply
        • jdgoat

          7 years ago

          Not really. PED’s don’t just turn you into one of the leagues best hitters overnight. But I can’t say that he’s not because I don’t know and I’m not going to start calling out every player who improves.

          But with the ways they can hide positive tests, it wouldn’t shock me if over half the league was/is on PED’s at some point.

          2
          Reply
        • Polish Hammer

          7 years ago

          MLB never comments on these things because of ongoing appeals, but they came right out and said there was nothing to the Ramirez story.

          Reply
        • Polish Hammer

          7 years ago

          Sudden surge? It’s his 3rd straight season of producing, and he’s just 25. It’s not like he was a Punch & Judy hitter and turned it on at 30 years old.

          Reply
  10. NotaGM

    7 years ago

    As more comes out we will learn it all. Yes, its all adds up with timing of allegations amd his release. Either way we dont know squat…so why assume??

    Reply
    • SG

      7 years ago

      So you’re apparently disputing Alex Cora’s press conference, after the game, by surmising this “all adds up”?

      To believe this you apparently have to assume the police secretly told the Red Sox, kept it quiet, and then released the information to a reporter without arresting Hanley.

      Why would the police do that? Do you have any idea how they would look if it came out that they did? Or that they told a reporter and let Hanley off the hook by not arresting him and tipping him off to possibly destroy evidence?

      Cora “categorically” stated the Red Sox had no knowledge of this, his release was entirely baseball related and he hoped the information was untrue.

      I have to conclude there is nothing to this report and that I would not want to be the reporter that released this information. She is going to be in big trouble if nothing comes of this.

      2
      Reply
      • NotaGM

        7 years ago

        Have you ever been thru the system or part of an investigation?

        1
        Reply
        • SG

          7 years ago

          Yes, I am a agent.

          3
          Reply
        • NotaGM

          7 years ago

          Still doesn’t answer the question?

          Reply
        • NotaGM

          7 years ago

          The system is screwed up….end result is facts.

          Yes, everything jives. He may be part of it but doesnt mean he’s guilty..

          Hence why this rumor came out hours before this site mentioned it.

          Legally, cops can lie to you during interrogations to seek answers.

          I’m a maine native and saw Hanley grow to the Marlins.

          People make bad devisions in life amd correct when wrong.

          I’m not voting he innocent not guilty
          ..just saying the sox new of the “allegations” .

          If you do your research “hence Rosanne comeback” you will see the Warner corp. Doesn’t wamt drama.

          Mr. Agent.

          1
          Reply
        • PopeMarley

          7 years ago

          “Yes, I am a agent” agent of chaos maybe. Now I’ve read it all on here.

          5
          Reply
        • SG

          7 years ago

          I have no idea why you don’t understand it when I stated that I am an agent? I am a Federal Agent.

          There is “no” investigation just a reporter’s report. No proof. Just conjecture.

          Per your words “we dont know squat…so why assume??”

          So I’m asking you why you are assuming?

          Hanley has not been arrested.

          2
          Reply
        • NotaGM

          7 years ago

          I’m an agent to and responding without legal advice haha….

          1
          Reply
        • NotaGM

          7 years ago

          Your words were “I’m an agent”.

          Don’t come to me with you claiming agent.

          An agent can be MLB agent or FEDERAL.

          End result, if you are say who you are publicly then why are your.comments jeopardizing the investigation?

          Reply
        • SG

          7 years ago

          Good night.
          I mistakenly thought I was having an intelligent conversation with a rational person.

          5
          Reply
        • toomuchpie

          7 years ago

          Operating an X-ray machine for TSA doesn’t count as being an “agent”.

          4
          Reply
        • NotaGM

          7 years ago

          Cant even answer….deff. Not TSA…more like patrolling the local beaches.

          Btw….its illegal to claim yourself as someone different.

          But hey…not intelligent enough to know that.

          Reply
        • PopeMarley

          7 years ago

          “I am a Federal Agent” you just keep topping yourself.

          2
          Reply
        • Steven Chinwood

          7 years ago

          My name is Bond…Sammy Bond..Agent doubl O?

          3
          Reply
        • mikeyank55

          7 years ago

          Or a travel agent.

          2
          Reply
        • Polish Hammer

          7 years ago

          Agent Orange

          Reply
        • Polish Hammer

          7 years ago

          He’s also been a general manager for the past eight years of his fantasy baseball league team.

          2
          Reply
        • moe 3

          7 years ago

          007

          1
          Reply
      • darkstar61

        7 years ago

        Who says it was the police that told the reporter? Could have been the guy who was arrested that made it all public in this mannor.

        The team may also be forced to say he was DFA’d for performance rather than an issue like this, least they open themselves up for a possible lawsuit

        Reply
      • thecoffinnail

        7 years ago

        This is what happens when someone with the ethics of a 1970’s porn director takes over the most prestigious job in the world. Every time someone in the press says something negative about him he screams “FAKE NEWS”. Now when reporters from well established reputable outlets write a story there are people that question whether it is fake or not.
        Think about it for a second George. Would this reporter go to school for years, start as an intern at a small paper, work their way up to the news desk, finally land a great job at a big paper or other news source, just to finally fulfill their life’s dream of one day saying that Hanley Ramirez could be part of a drug investigation?
        This story will be forgotten in a month. If a reporter decided to make something like this up the truth would come out and his/her reputation would be in tatters. As well as the reputation of the paper that they work for. Everything they say from that day forward would be questioned and they would never regain the public’s trust again.
        So, before you question someone whose entire life (no to mention their co-workers and bosses) rests on their ethics, ask yourself why would they do that?
        Please stop listening to Fox News so much. If every customer from a car lot but one (and that one is the salesman’s mom) says your salesman was a liar and a crook, and the salesman tells you not to listen to them because they are all liars and out to get him, who would you believe?
        I apologize for not talking about baseball or the topic of the article, but attacking the 1st Amendment must always be stopped dead in its tracks. We are living in a dangerous time, I fear the quote from Star Wars “So this is how liberty dies… with thunderous applause.” actually has a chance to come true. I could care less about politics. In my opinion they are all out for themselves. But, I love my country and the Constitution that gives me a reason to love it.

        1
        Reply
      • SG

        7 years ago

        So much for all of the conspiracy lunatics that responded to this post on Friday and Saturday. LOL

        It looks like George B got it right.

        Reply
      • crisowen

        7 years ago

        exactly if there’s an investigation the investigators most generally very quietly investigate, they are not going to release anu info that could get back to target who if they had any brains would destroy evidence

        Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      7 years ago

      As I stated very clearly in the post, it is not clear yet at all that the timing lines up with his release.

      1
      Reply
      • NotaGM

        7 years ago

        Exactly but we have a federal agent on here telling us differ….which comprises a Federal Investigation without am indictment.

        Reply
  11. start_wearing_purple

    7 years ago

    As a Red Sox fan all I can really say is: Not our problem any more.

    1
    Reply
    • NotaGM

      7 years ago

      Watch out cause we have a federal agent on here provide info for an investigation.

      Reply
    • Steven Chinwood

      7 years ago

      Yea it is. How many millions do they still owe him 10-11?

      3
      Reply
    • Polish Hammer

      7 years ago

      Your problem as long as you keep writing checks for that money owed.

      Reply
  12. halos101

    7 years ago

    Seems like yesterday he was traded to the dodgers. Now he’s released, probably done with baseball and now wrapped up in a federal and state drug investigation. Crazy

    Reply
  13. 22222pete

    7 years ago

    It was likely an ongoing investigation. Red Sox may have been tipped off. Most likely the guy arrested and his partners had been under investigation for awhile. The delay in the arrest papers most likely due to investigators trying to get him to name the big fish.

    If Hanley involved Rico going to clean him out. Hope not but that facetime call doesnt bode well

    Reminds me somewhat of Manny Alexander and the Bat Boy driving his car loaded with syringes (Manny didn’t play another MLB after the season for over 3 years) and Remys son selling steroids to another Red sox security staffer getting caught with steroids in his car (Manny Ramirez traded to Dodgers right after).

    Reply
  14. GarryHarris

    7 years ago

    I assumed Hanley Ramirez would be picked up sometime after the all star break. Now, I don’t think he will. No team wants a remake of the Ron LeFlore’s “posse” in the clubhouse of the 1980 Montreal Expos..

    Reply
  15. 6shuter

    7 years ago

    Lots of peoples can’t read very well. The Red Sox DFA’d Hanley on March 25th. After waiting the week necessary, on March 30th unconditional release waivers were requested. On June 1st they were granted.
    I guy in the car wasn’t arrested until June 6th, 12 days AFTER Hanley was DFA’d. How could that play in the Red Sox decision to release him? I’m sure the guy was arrested at the time of the stop when they found enough fentanyl to OD a few thousand people.

    2
    Reply
    • darkstar61

      7 years ago

      We don’t know when the investigation into this case actually began, but we can safely assume it was well before the traffic stop considering that stop was part of a joint operation between at least 3 law enforcement groups.

      We also don’t know when Hanley’s name was first brought into it, and if his already having been under investigation prior was the entire reason they allowed the guy wanting to rat on Hanley to make the call.

      All we know for sure is that a guy, after being stopped and at about the same time a search warrant was being enforced on his home, apparently was given the opportunity to be a cooperating witness and preceeded to give the authorities more evidence into their larger investigation.

      So don’t act like everyone can’t read when in actuality, it looks as if you just didn’t stop to think things thru before running with your assumptions and condescension – as it stands, for all any of us know, Ramirez may have been under investigation for months and the police might have gone to the Red Sox about getting their help in the investigation before he was ever designated for assignment

      Reply
      • 6shuter

        7 years ago

        Yeap, I’m sure the DEA agents would leak it to the Red Sox what they were doing before any arrests were made …..

        seriously, stop making nonsense up

        1
        Reply
        • darkstar61

          7 years ago

          Who says they would be “leaking” anything, thats gibberish. Contacting the Red Sox to inquire about known associates seen frequenting the ballpark very well could have happened though. Or could have contacted them about surveillance footage or phone logs or who knows what. Shoot, could have even gone with a warrent. Its not like we are talking about 7-11 employees here who can’t be trusted to cooperate without instantly filling the suspect in on things.

          This was a massive, joint operation sting too – not some random stop where they happened upon drugs and started allowing the suspect to start calling his friends. But the fact they did allow him to make the call indicates Hanley was a suspect well prior to the stop. And at that point, we have no idea just who they went to for evidence/help, or just how involved anyone else is/was

          Reply
        • Cat Mando

          7 years ago

          “But the fact they did allow him to make the call indicates Hanley was a suspect well prior to the stop”
          Well that theory kinda fell apart now, didn’t it?

          Reply
        • 6shuter

          7 years ago

          Y’all look like the fools you were … congrats
          Learn to read

          1
          Reply
    • tank62

      7 years ago

      Clearly you cant read since the dates were may not march

      Reply
  16. dm038

    7 years ago

    Clearly the Red Sox took the high road knowing there was more than baseball reasons for his release.

    Reply
    • jdgoat

      7 years ago

      That’s not true. He was dfa’d before this happened.

      Reply
      • darkstar61

        7 years ago

        We don’t know that

        We only know the reporter was told the joint task force allowed one arrested suspect to set up another suspect at a time after Hanley was already in limbo. We don’t know when he first became a person of interest, or who all the police had gone to in that investigation (including possibly asking for the Red Sox help) prior to them picking up the arrested suspect.

        Reply
      • Ry.the.Stunner

        7 years ago

        Like darkstar61 said, you have no idea when it happened. Cano was just recently suspended for PEDs and we all just found out about it, but the truth is, his positive test came during the offseason and Cano and others already knew about it.

        Reply
    • Polish Hammer

      7 years ago

      High road? More like damage control and trying to back away from a bad situation that happened under their watch.

      Reply
  17. Harold Steinblatt

    7 years ago

    The Mets should pick him up. Why not? The team’s owners are criminal – literally, according to people I know who were professionally involved with the Madoff Ponzi scheme court proceedings. Met-aphorically, because they refuse to spend despite the fact that they still are absolutely loaded. Finally, they would lose in civil court if deGrom sued them for lack of support – not quite murder, but certainly torture, which is against the law.

    So there’s no reason not to add a criminal who could possibly entertain the fans a little and then possibly do something bizarre that would distract them – me – from just how pathetic their team is..

    Reply
    • justin-turner overdrive

      7 years ago

      Hanley could platoon at 1B for the Yankees too.

      Reply
  18. SG

    7 years ago

    If I’m Adam Katz (Agent) and Hanley Ramirez I am initiating a lawsuit for defamation of character.

    It’s clear Michelle McPhee has damaged Hanley Ramirez’s employment potential with this report.

    Some would say why would she do this without proof?

    So, I’m asking to see the proof ! Let’s see it !

    A reporter has freedom of speech, as we all do, but when you slander another and cause financial injury you are subject to a lawsuit if you can’t provide the “proof”.

    It’s disgraceful some accept reporting without proof and chalk it up to freedom of speech and then object to someone stating show the proof or be sued.

    4
    Reply
    • Harold Steinblatt

      7 years ago

      A very valid point. There is every possibility that rumors of such a nature swirling around Ramirez would be enough for Boston, who, like every other team, are all about money and projecting a false morality – players who beat their wives come back and are welcome – to let him go.

      1
      Reply
    • muskie73

      7 years ago

      Was anything in the McPhee report inaccurate?

      Some readers may have jumped to inaccurate conclusions.

      Hanley Ramirez’s name reportedly came up in an arrest and law enforcement in due diligence followed up on that lead. The follow-up apparently has resulted in Ramirez being cleared.

      Carry on.

      1
      Reply
      • SG

        7 years ago

        Obviously the entire report was inaccurate and the news media jumped to the inaccurate conclusions it did when the headline was “Hanley Ramirez being investigated by Federal and State authorities”.

        So you think it’s OK for a reporter to slander a person without the facts?

        That’s what happened here.

        And if you read all of the idiotic comments this triggered you’ll understand that this kind of inaccurate reporting “must” have consequences for the perpetrators. Look at the idiotic comments like the Red Sox knew and that’s why they dumped him. The police are in conspiracy with the Red Sox feeding them privileged information or that the police would tell a reporter they were investigating someone so they could destroy evidence.

        Will anyone ever take an article by Michelle McPhee seriously again?.

        2
        Reply
  19. getright11

    7 years ago

    Some of yall JUMPED to some conclusions

    3
    Reply
  20. justin-turner overdrive

    7 years ago

    People have no reading comprehension anymore, it sucks.

    1
    Reply
  21. SG

    7 years ago

    So much for all of the conspiracy lunatics that responded to this post on Friday and Saturday. LOL

    It looks like the Federal Agent George B got it right.

    If I’m Hanley I sue Michelle McPhee for this fiasco

    I must say I really got a good laugh re-reading some of the idiots that responded to George B and now look like total clowns.

    3
    Reply
    • majorflaw

      7 years ago

      “It looks like the Federal Agent George B got it right.”

      Since you are attempting to credential yourself, could you be a little more specific. What sort of “federal agent” are you? FBI, Treasury, ICE, Fish and Wildlife? While anyone can be anything on the internets at least choose which sort of federal agent you’re claiming to be. I may have some follow up questions on point.

      “ . . . I got a good laugh re-reading some of those idiots that responded to George B and now look like total clowns.”

      And this bizarre victory dance of yours, how do you think it makes you look.

      Reply
      • SG

        7 years ago

        I didn’t see your post “amongst the idiots and clowns”.
        Why are you making yourself one now?

        Reply
        • majorflaw

          7 years ago

          Pardon me? I saw some guy making the ridiculous claim that he is a “federal agent”, whatever that is, and you doing a victory dance for some reason. Didn’t participate in this thread the first go round.

          “Why are you making yourself one now?”

          You answer mine first, why did you stop beating your wife?

          You appear to be taking this issue a bit personally for some reason. But I’m not a mind reader.

          Reply
        • SG

          7 years ago

          There’s and old saying.
          “Better to appear a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt”.
          Congratulation, you have just made yourself a fool by removing all doubt.

          Reply
        • majorflaw

          7 years ago

          Haven’t “made” myself anything, sphincter. You’ve obviously got a bug up your butt over something here. Still not clear what it is but that’s not important. To be continued.

          Reply
    • davidcoonce74

      7 years ago

      Suing a journalist for reporting a story? Uh, that’s like some Soviet stuff. I do think MLBTR should take the story down simply because I assume lots of people read headlines without digging any deeper.

      Reply
      • Jeff Todd

        7 years ago

        I think it would be more harmful to make it disappear than to keep the full context here, including the amply hedged initial treatment of this report.

        Not sure of how the timing of all this went, so your comment may have reflected concern with the headline. I think the current version is appropriate.

        Reply
  22. No Soup For Yu!

    7 years ago

    It’s laughable reading all the responses to this article from a few days ago. People just couldn’t resist making it into a conspiracy theory

    Reply
  23. hiflew

    7 years ago

    The bad thing is that there will be a lot of people that remember the original story, but not the correction. His name will be unfairly tainted forever now.

    5
    Reply
    • Solaris601

      7 years ago

      Just the same as players who never tested positive for PEDs still get lumped in with those who did because their names were mentioned in the same sentence. I’m not sure how much interest there was in signing Ramirez this month, but you can bet this episode – no matter how fraudulent – will cause some teams to think twice. The good news is you’re not under investigation. The bad news is you’re not under contract either.

      Reply
    • Polish Hammer

      7 years ago

      If you don’t think the inner circle of the league knows all about which guys are clubhouse cancers and which guys get that extra bump in the exercise you’re very naive.

      Reply
  24. Polish Hammer

    7 years ago

    So pleased to be absolved he jumped on the next thing smoking headed to the DR instead of sitting by the phone hoping the Dodgers come calling.

    Reply
  25. pasha2k

    7 years ago

    I’m happy it was false. I was going some low life mentioned his name to take the heat off him. I did read the guy did a face time call to Hanley. But I am so happy this is the way it ends, I like Hanley, n wish he was still with them. This is a lesson for me not to make a decision before knowing all the facts. We all tend to have them guilty till proven innocent….not good.

    1
    Reply
    • SG

      7 years ago

      If you have arrived at that logic then I would say you have become a fairer and more descent person and I am happy for you.

      Reply
  26. tank62

    7 years ago

    No wonder why people do not trust the media anymore. This so called reporter could’ve done the same digging the other two did to get the truth. But she didn’t so I hope Ramirez sues her into oblivion

    Reply
  27. Sid Bream

    7 years ago

    People ‘read’ news and they still don’t understand or comprehend it. People look at covers of magazine and then they ‘think’ they understand it. What a joke and a farce some of the ‘media’ have become with their fake & unreliable ‘news’ and ‘reporting’.

    1
    Reply
  28. 22222pete

    7 years ago

    The latest report from 2 reporters who work for the Red Sox who own the Globe is behind a paywall. Does she quote any law enforcement officials? Headline says Federal. How about State?

    Also, investigators dont always confirm who they are investigating. Plus the earlier report claimed the friend told the cops a box in the car was owned by Hanley and that box contained drugs.

    I am not taking sides but I am not sure we know enough on either side to say whats up here. I do find it puzzling nobody has signed Hanley although that may be his choice.

    I also was surprised at the timing of the release. He was crushing LHPers even when in his slump that started after being HBP, and he was one of their best clutch hitters. Certainly Moreland should have been playing more and Hanley might be unhappy, but thats what managers are paid to do, which is manage your players. Releasing players because you think he may be unhappy and not deal with it well is just not believable. Try it first.

    Reply
  29. manos

    7 years ago

    Man everybody just jumps to conclusions. The media is all about being first instead of being right. You all judge as well. Shame!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    The Astros Are (Again) Not Getting Much From A Pricey First Base Signing

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    Royals Outright Thomas Hatch

    Diamondbacks Place Kendall Graveman On 15-Day IL

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Guardians’ Will Brennan, Andrew Walters Undergo Season-Ending Surgeries

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Nats Notes: Nuñez, Chapparo, Williams

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version