Some news from around the AL West, as the division heads into the All-Star break with four teams over the .500 mark…
- There was some buzz last month about the Mariners discussing a trade for Cole Hamels, though the Seattle Times’ Ryan Divish hears that the Mariners’ “interest was greatly overplayed.” Whatever talks the M’s and Rangers had about Hamels could have been simply due diligence on the part of Seattle GM Jerry Dipoto, who “checks in on every player and will never toss away any proposal immediately.”
- The Mariners’ general need for pitching is further explored by Divish as part of his mailbag piece, as he isn’t sure Seattle will necessarily target a starter. For one, a clear top-of-the-rotation arm may not be available. The team’s search for such a pitcher is further complicated by the fact that some members of Mariners ownership and the upper-level management team aren’t keen on acquiring players who are only under contract for the rest of this season (i.e. Hamels or J.A. Happ, another pitcher linked to Seattle on the rumor mill.) It should be noted that Hamels is technically under control for 2019 via a club option, though at a steep cost of $20MM. As for a more controllable arm on a frequent Mariners trade partner, Divish doesn’t believe the M’s have the prospect depth to obtain Chris Archer from the Rays.
- The Angels have been getting calls about such relievers as Blake Parker, Cam Bedrosian, and Justin Anderson, Ken Rosenthal reports in a video update for FOXSports.com. All three right-handers have pitched well this season, with Parker stepping up as Anaheim’s first choice at closer in the wake of Keynan Middleton’s Tommy John surgery. Rosenthal suggests the Angels will be open to selling high on these arms due to the “volatile” nature of relief pitchers on a year-to-year basis, though obviously L.A. would want a decent return since all three come with multiple years of control.
- With the Athletics positioned to make additions at the trade deadline, the San Francisco Chronicle’s Susan Slusser figures the team will look to add pitching in some form. Though the rotation is Oakland’s biggest need, Slusser suggests the A’s could “get creative” by bolstering its already-solid relief corps, which would allow the starters to make shorter outings before turning things over to the bullpen. If the A’s do pursue a starter, it will be a mid-tier arm rather than a frontline ace — Slusser suggests the Twins’ Jake Odorizzi or Lance Lynn as the types of starters Oakland would look at obtaining, though there isn’t any indication that the A’s have specific interest in either of those Minnesota pitchers.
Slusser is usually way off with her rosterbation / “insider” knowledge, Beane makes bold moves, and never gets Lynn or Odorizzi types unless they’re free or off waiver claims. Anyone who’s not trying to offend her employers can totally see the A’s getting deGrom or Syndergaard at the deadline, but I personally really hope they move on from Lucroy and get Realmuto at no matter the cost. Having the best C in MLB will really take this team to the next level no matter who’s pitching, and his bat currently speaks to a .904 OPS so he’d be hitting in the top 3 maybe even leadoff.
The M’s interested in the Shark? Yep sweet, we will send him over right away… no? Haha
No thank you; however Ervin Santana (great rehab outing today) or Danny Duffy would be nice!!
YES… was thinking exactly the same thing! Both can be under control for next year (and in Duffy’s case, even beyond.) Santana can be kept with a team option at $14MM next year or let go with a $1MM buyout; so if the M’s acquired him without taking any money from the Twins, it would be a $6.4MM commitment, with basically signing Santana for $13MM for 2019 if he does well. For Duffy, he’s under contract through 2021 (roughly $5.6MM for the rest of this year, $15.25MM/year for ’19 and ’20, $15.5MM in ’21), so the Royals would have to throw in some $$$ to pay it down to a reasonable level, but that could happen.
The other pitcher under a long-term contract the M’s could consider is Jordan Zimmermann, who appears to be closer to his Washington Nationals form recently. He’s owed about $9.6MM for the rest of this year, and then $25MM/year for ’19 and ’20. Detroit would probably have to subsidize half of that to move him, but that would make him attractive.
I like the creative thinking. All three options sound good for the M’s, especially given their below average farm. (Personally, I think their farm is fine, it’s just young)
I know this doesn’t apply to this division but what would it take for Cleveland to land Zach Britton? Their bullpen outside of Perez, Miller, and Allen is highly inconsistent and if they wanna go far this postseason they may wanna roll the dice on Britton.
Hand would be a lot more expensive from my outlook on things
The Angels would be stupid to trade Anderson.
I agree. Although I do think that it would be smart to trade Blake Parker while his stock is pretty high. Justin Anderson’s still has a ton of potential to build value before moving him. As for Bedrosian, I’m ready to move on from him as soon as possible. It just seems like he always fumbles whenever we need him most, but then goes on to throw 2 no hit innings when we’re down by 5+ runs
It’s possible they might see him as a Mike Morin type, that once hitters have enough data and everything on him, he’ll get hit around a bit. If that’s the case, it would be wise to trade him now.
I agree. Trade bedrosian and parker, keep anderson and test him as closer. See if it works out. Relievers are too unpredictable. Get something while you can. Hold onto Heaney and Skaggs unless you get a really good haul in return.
I would be fine with the Angels trading Bedrosian, but not Parker or Anderson. Parker and Anderson have been reliable, but Bedrosian has been wild. He’ll throw ten consecutive scoreless innings and then allow four runs in his next two innings.
And it’s not like the Angels’ season is over.
On August 2nd, 1995, the Seattle Mariners had a record of 43-46 and trailed the California Angels in the AL West by 13 games. Yet they ended up winning the division (in a tiebreaker game), finishing at 79-66.
On September 4th, 2011, the Tampa Bay Rays trailed the Boston Red Sox by nine games for the then-only wild card spot but came back to make the postseason.
Also in 2011, the St. Louis Cardinals trailed the Atlanta Braves in the wild card race by 8.5 games on September 6th, yet came back to win the World Series that year.
We’re just at the AS break and the Angels are down nine in the WC race. Seattle is just 2-7 in their last nine. An Angels’ comeback is, albeit improbable, not out of the question, and there’s no reason to trade away young talent (Parker, Anderson, Heaney, Skaggs).
M’s better do something quick before they completely fall out of the WC race. They need a SP and a bat.
Where would the bat play? Cano coming back already causes a headache in the infield, and our OF rotation is doing it’s job. Well except Heredia, then the bat would need to be a CF.
Nobody said a starting position player cant get traded. LF, Cf even 1st base can all be upgraded. Dee gets a past due to chemistry.
CF definitely could. But Span has done great (well, offensively) in LF since the trade, and I was thinking Lucas Duda to platoon with Healy, but, like I said, the Cano situation would cause a serious headache there.
Love Susan but screw those Twins pitchers, lets bring Tyson back home where he belongs
Hes not that good and a constant injury risk. We got that covered.
Ross is probably the best out of the three. Though that isn’t saying a whole hell of a lot.
I agree, and I think the fact that he’s only signed through the end of this year is something of a feather in his cap, considering his injury history.
Either pitcher would be an improvement for the A’s. Realmuto at best, but if the cost is too high….probably the best move, is to stand pat.
Not be and improvement…. late night texting…
I think James Shields would be a nice acquisition for the A’s. Shields is a guy who goes deep into his starts every fifth day, his problems with the long ball would be mitigated by the park, and the cost would be bare-minimum in terms of prospect capital. Between the money San Diego is paying and the money the White Sox likely would pay, the salary cost wouldn’t be ridiculous, either.
Here’s a thought! The A’s are going to be looking for a starting pitcher come time for the Winter Meetings anyways and cannot afford 15-20 mil a year. Why not lock in an Ace SP NOW such as Degrom with 2 years of control and a shot at this season. He is young and controllable and is NOT a rental. Sure, you will have to give up strong prospects, but our farm system is pretty deep anyway. You can still keep Luzardo, Puk, Murphy, etc. to build for the future. A mid-tier pitcher is nothing better than we already have! What’s wrong with making a REAL move now. The A’s are right in this!
You know where this is going right the Phillies are serious about winning and they want the hometown kid in trout. They want to show him how serious they are.