Headlines

  • Red Sox To Promote Roman Anthony
  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Latest On Manny Machado

By Steve Adams | July 16, 2018 at 10:03pm CDT

10:03pm: The Phillies “would include” young righty Adonis Medina in a deal for Machado, per MLB.com’s Jon Morosi. Medina, a top-100 prospect, is a player the Orioles have long been rumored to have interest in. If he’s in the package, it could make the Phils “well-positioned” to land Machado, writes Morosi, though surely there’s still time for other organizations to boost their offers as well.

3:55pm: The Orioles are getting “very close” to reaching an agreement on a Manny Machado trade, reports Roch Kubatko of MASNsports.com (via Twitter). However, despite a report of a “handshake agreement” between the Orioles and Phillies by Barstool Sports, Kubatko adds that there’s no deal between the two teams in place. To the contrary, Kubatko notes that both the Brewers and the Dodgers remain involved in the Machado market. Brittany Ghiroli of MLB.com agrees, tweeting that “numerous” sources tell her that rumors regarding an agreement with the Phillies are “untrue.”

To be sure, it’d be strange for any club, especially one in the Orioles’ position, to effectively close off bidding 36 hours in advance of completing a trade when a better offer could come floating in at any time. An arrangement of that nature would come with little in the form of precedent. The inevitable Machado trade will be a franchise-altering moment for the Orioles, and cutting off negotiations this far in advance would be a downright bizarre means of going about it. By agreeing to a delayed agreement, they’d leave no room for the Dodgers, Brewers or any other club — the Yankees, D-backs, Braves, Indians and others have been involved to varying extents — to top whatever is currently being offered by the Phillies.

That said, it’s true that the league generally frowns on news of this magnitude breaking during All-Star festivities. It’s certainly possible that both sides are optimistic about something coming together shortly after the All-Star Game, and none of this is to say that the Phils won’t ultimately come away as the “winners” of the Machado sweepstakes, so to speak. But for the time being, it’s only logical to assume that the bidding for Machado remains open as the the Orioles seek to extract the best possible package of young talent.

Regardless of where Machado ultimately lands, the timeline depicted this lengthy saga may indeed reach its end shortly after the All-Star Game. Reports over the past week have indicated that the O’s are loath to trade Machado prior to the Midsummer Classic, where he’ll represent them in Washington D.C. as the American League’s starting shortstop. Jim Bowden of The Athletic took matters a bit further this morning, tweeting that Machado is “expected to be traded” after Tuesday’s All-Star Game and before the regular season resumes play on Friday.

As one can imagine, the rumor cycle is beginning to wear on even Machado himself. Speaking to reporters during the media hour for today’s events, Machado said that if he is ultimately going to be traded, he “100 percent” hopes it is over with sooner rather than later (Twitter link via The Athletic’s Jayson Stark). “To not answer these questions anymore, that would be good,” said Machado. The infielder also once again acknowledged that he has “no say” in where he plays following a trade (Twitter link via Fancred’s Jon Heyman), but his preference in free agency will be to pursue opportunities where he’s able to play shortstop (Twitter link via Ghiroli).

Share 0 Retweet 10 Send via email0

Arizona Diamondbacks Baltimore Orioles Los Angeles Dodgers Milwaukee Brewers Philadelphia Phillies Manny Machado

Mariners Sign Cameron Rupp
Main
Phillies Considering Attempt To Acquire J.A. Happ
View Comments (213)
Post a Comment

213 Comments

  1. waxbuddie

    7 years ago

    Enough talk, trade him

    5
    Reply
    • reevewashere

      7 years ago

      There going to wait to let him participate in the allstar game.

      4
      Reply
      • joshb600

        7 years ago

        That’s what I was thinking but they could just trade him and let Chris Davis replace him!

        Reply
        • dimitrios in la

          7 years ago

          Chris Davis at short is a wonderful idea!

          4
          Reply
        • Aaron Sapoznik

          7 years ago

          Yes! Then Davis’ contract can be the benchmark for all current MLB shortstops, at least until Machado obliterates it along with A-Rod’s two past deals this offseason.

          Reply
        • Opposing Views

          7 years ago

          Could he really hurt the team any more at SS than he does in the batters box?

          5
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          I agree, Michelle’s report is dabomb!

          1
          Reply
        • joepanikatthedisco

          7 years ago

          “munth”

          Reply
      • ray_derek

        7 years ago

        *They’re

        Reply
    • imacwhou

      7 years ago

      Hurry up already

      Reply
    • outinleftfield

      7 years ago

      Wednesday.

      Reply
    • hohnav21

      7 years ago

      Agreed!!!

      Reply
  2. BrianB

    7 years ago

    Ugh the Phillies! LOL Gross! Smells of a rental and then Philly dissappears LOL

    1
    Reply
    • Ronk325

      7 years ago

      The Phillies have a ton of money to spend so if they’re trading for Machado now that would signal they have every intention of signing him in the offseason

      4
      Reply
      • sals029

        7 years ago

        A lot easier said than done, regardless of how much money they have to offer.

        1
        Reply
      • RedRooster

        7 years ago

        Trading for him isn’t a prerequisite for signing him!

        5
        Reply
        • flippinbats79

          7 years ago

          It definitely helps. If you’re looking at free agent destinations, it’s much more attractive to go to a place you’ve already played.

          5
          Reply
        • DodgersBaseball23

          7 years ago

          Yeah as long as you enjoyed your time there. If not it could kill your shot to sign him.

          7
          Reply
        • Boston2AZ

          7 years ago

          Sometimes, maybe. Randy Johnson didn’t, neither did Jon Lester or JD Martinez.

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          That’s not the type of thing you give up top 100 prospects for. Phillies will have to pay close to market rate either way.

          Reply
        • stymeedone

          7 years ago

          Cespedes did.

          Reply
        • Aaron Sapoznik

          7 years ago

          Somebody will be paying the price. It might just as well be a contender like the Phillies who will have a better chance of signing him this offseason than the other two primary bidders in Los Angeles and Milwaukee. Whichever team lands Machado will also enhance their postseason chances this year as well.

          2
          Reply
        • Ronk325

          7 years ago

          Johnson, Lester, and Martinez are terrible comparisons because the teams they were traded to didn’t have the money to resign them. The Phillies will be capable of at least matching if not topping any offer from another team and they have a young competitive team that plays in a hitters park. Add in the fact that he would be able to stay at SS there and the Phillies easily become one of his top suitors

          4
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          @stymeedone the Mets traded for Cespedes because they needed a slugger for their playoff drive and he was the best one available, not because they thought they would be able to sign him.

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          @Ronk325 that also means the Phillies have enough money to sign him if they don’t trade for him so they’re better off waiting until the offseason and signing him for nothing but money.

          Reply
        • bigkempin

          7 years ago

          The last 3 WS winners had big name rentals that helped them win a title (Cueto, Chapman, Verlander)

          2
          Reply
        • Ronk325

          7 years ago

          @redrooster I understand what you’re saying but the Phillies are currently in 1st place and have gotten awful offensive production from their SS’s this year. Machado improves the team now and having him for a couple months might improve their chances of resigning him in the offseason

          2
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          @Ronk325 if you want him for this year then trade whatever you think two months of him (plus the playoffs) is worth. Trading for him won’t improve their chances of re-signing him one bit.

          Reply
        • Phillies2017

          7 years ago

          Oakland is a small market team and Arizona had an already exorbitant payroll and is an NL team which wouldn’t make sense to pay jd

          I dont have an answer for Johnson though.

          Reply
        • Ronk325

          7 years ago

          How can you say for sure that trading for Machado now wouldn’t increase the Phillies chances of resigning him. If he enjoys his time in Philly and they offer him a deal comparable to their competitors that could definitely work in their favor

          2
          Reply
        • Phillies2017

          7 years ago

          Verlander wasnt a rental

          2
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          Because they’ll still have to pay him basically market rate. There’s no reason to give up top 100 prospects on top of that.

          Reply
        • lord vincent

          7 years ago

          How do you know that? Are you his agent or family?

          Reply
        • Ronk325

          7 years ago

          Again I understand what you mean but at the same time the Phillies are trying to improve their team for this year as well. If they can get Machado without giving up Sixto Sanchez or Adonis Medina it would have to be seen as a win

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          @lord vincent yeah I am

          1
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          @Ronk325 then give up whatever you feel 2 months of Machado + the playoffs are worth. If he re-signs then that’s just gravy.

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          Teams that have traded for an All Star quality FA to be over the past 30 years have resigned them 12.3% of the time. The other 29 teams 3..02% of the time. Only the Yankees have signed as much as 5% of those FA.

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          Yes and what percent of the time has a free agent to be taken a significant discount to sign with the team that traded for him?
          Oh and 12.3% + 3.02% is only 15.32%. Who signs them the other 84.68% of the time?

          1
          Reply
        • Woodlawn

          7 years ago

          Lol. Philly ain’t NY. Machado has Yankees written all over him. No chance he resigns in philly.

          Reply
        • augold5

          7 years ago

          Lol why don’t you take 87.7 divided by 29… its called logic, you should try it sometime.

          Reply
        • Ronk325

          7 years ago

          I’m not a Phillies fan and I have no idea what the Orioles would accept in return for 2 months of Machado. Also why do assume the Phillies contract offer will be significantly less than other teams? The Phillies are capable of giving him $35 million a year if that’s what it would take. Also the Yankees and Dodgers who will presumably be the other top suitors won’t be able to let him play SS which works in the Phillies favor

          1
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          @Ronk325 The only way your argument works is if the Phillies trading for Machado is a prerequisite for giving him $35m/yr in free agency.

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          @augold5 we both know that 87.7% is not evenly distributed among the other 29 teams. And that still doesn’t answer my question of what % of the time the player takes a significant discount to sign with the team that traded him. Rich Hill and Yoenis Cespedes don’t help your argument because the Dodgers and Mets outbid everyone else to sign them.

          Reply
        • Ronk325

          7 years ago

          @redrooster I don’t understand what you’re getting at now. $35m/yr is what it will probably take to sign Machado and the Phillies could surely offer him that much if that’s what it takes. They have one of the lowest payrolls in the league right now and also one of the best tv deals. They have plenty of money to go around

          1
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          Yes and trading for him in advance of his free agency is not a prerequisite for paying him all that money.

          Reply
        • Ronk325

          7 years ago

          If they’re giving up prospects for Machado now you would have to think they’re going to do whatever it takes to sign him in free agency it’s as simple as that

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          They don’t have to trade for him to do that. Mmmkay?

          Reply
        • Donald seay

          7 years ago

          Verlander was not a rental!

          Reply
        • Ronk325

          7 years ago

          Trading for him now goes back to my point from earlier. The Phillies have had terrible offensive production from their shortstops this year. They are currently in 1st place so trading for Machado now strengthens their team for the rest of this year while also giving them a potential leg up on signing himin free agency. Now was that so hard for you to understand

          1
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          Then again, trade whatever you feel Machado for the rest of this season plus a potential playoff run is worth. And if he signs elsewhere after the season I better not see one Phillies fan complaining about it on here. There is no formal or informal agreement that he will stay. And if they do sign him it won’t suddenly make the trade better because they didn’t have to trade for him to do that.

          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          7 years ago

          Phillies already including Medina.

          Reply
        • justinept

          7 years ago

          Any team signing Machado will likely have to pay above market value because that’s typically how free agency works…

          Since Machado is likely going to the highest bidder, Philly trading for him now only helps them if he was previously against signing with Philly for any amount of money – and somehow playing for them for two months opened his eyes to the possibility.

          And while Machado gives them a leg up to making the playoffs, I don’t think this deal would make them Phillies better than either the Cubs or Dodgers. If the idea is to win a WS, giving up prospects to acquire a guy who likely won’t get them there is probably a bad idea.

          Reply
      • Bryzzo2016

        7 years ago

        Right, he’ll be able to play where he wants while still getting the contract he wants. If he doesn’t want to stay in Philly, it won’t matter if they can afford him or not.

        1
        Reply
    • jh8913

      7 years ago

      Lol not many people enjoy their time in philly

      Reply
      • Aaron Sapoznik

        7 years ago

        Try telling that to many of their HOF players and those who enjoyed World Series championships in “The City of Brotherly Love” in 1980 and 2008!

        1
        Reply
      • Phillies2017

        7 years ago

        If you play hard, the city loves you. Look at Hunter Pence. He was here for a year and had a really good relationship with the fans

        3
        Reply
        • justinept

          7 years ago

          Most all pro athletes play hard. You’re confusing success with effort. If he has a bad August, Phillies fans will turn on him in a nano second – and then they’ll claim he isn’t trying hard enough …

          Reply
  3. sportsjunkie24

    7 years ago

    They will after the asg otherwise the orioles would be all star less

    1
    Reply
  4. jekporkins

    7 years ago

    Translation: He will be traded to the Phillies, but they will wait until after the All-Star game so he can technically play as an Oriole in the starting lineup.

    4
    Reply
    • tharrie0820

      7 years ago

      So he can play at all. I’d you get named an all star and get traded you’re ineligible to play

      Reply
      • Aaron Sapoznik

        7 years ago

        That’s not necessarily true anymore. Machado could still play if he were traded within the same league. If he’s traded out of the AL as it now appears, it would be up to MLB to decide his eligibility. It’s a moot point now anyway with a trade likely to be consummated after tomorrow’s contest.

        1
        Reply
      • bigguccisosa300

        7 years ago

        No you’re not. You just wear a weird mlb jersey

        Reply
        • justinept

          7 years ago

          The last guy it happened to was Samardzija. But that was also the era of the game “counting.” I could understand the rule then. Why wouldn’t Samardzija, who was playing on a damn good A’s team st that point, serve up batting practice fastballs to help get the AL home field? That would’ve been a disaster for baseball.

          But since the stipulation is gone, the rule should be, too. Not sure it is. But it should be.

          Reply
    • Pedro Cerrano's Voodoo

      7 years ago

      Thinkin you’re right.

      Reply
  5. LongTimeListener1stTimecaller

    7 years ago

    He’ll be traded directly after the All Star Game a la Boogie Cousins

    3
    Reply
  6. Mattimeo09

    7 years ago

    Alright final guess time. Who’s taking home Machado?

    Reply
    • Yelsnit

      7 years ago

      Orioles?

      4
      Reply
    • MetsYankeesRedSox

      7 years ago

      Rockford Peaches!
      He can take over for Marla Hooch.

      Reply
      • treday

        7 years ago

        I don’t know man, sounds like a downgrade for Rockford, that Marla Hooch can really swing it

        3
        Reply
        • GareBear

          7 years ago

          Hooch is batting .420, definitely a downgrade

          1
          Reply
        • Yankeepride88

          7 years ago

          I’m from Rockford. Nothing is a downgrade for us.

          3
          Reply
        • MetsYankeesRedSox

          7 years ago

          Yeah she’s prettier than Manny too

          Reply
        • justinept

          7 years ago

          You got Magic Waters. Which is nice – when it’s clean.

          Reply
      • justinept

        7 years ago

        Watch the directors cut some time. Marla comes back and gets traded to Racine.

        Then, during the WS, Dottie takes out Marla with a hard slide at second base – unaware that Marla was pregnant. She’s stretchered off the field. The Peaches turn on Dottie for this, and it’s why she “quits” during the WS.

        Yea – the directors cut is dark as f***.

        Jimmy also tries to get on Dottie. But that’s a story for another thread.

        Reply
  7. ronnyalton

    7 years ago

    I dont give a sh/t ifhe goes to the Twins at this point. Trade him already and move on from the article space.

    Reply
    • Joe Kerr

      7 years ago

      This hasn’t been nearly as bad as pretty much the entire off-season.

      Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      7 years ago

      You realize you aren’t obligated to read any articles on this site, right? Unless you pay the bills, their article choices shouldn’t concern you.

      7
      Reply
  8. bababooeytoyall

    7 years ago

    The team who gets Machado better hope he signs with them. Especially the Phillies who are not even ready to compete against anyone this year. Why not see if you could sign him in the off-season rather than send off top prospects for a rental?

    1
    Reply
    • Caseys.Partner

      7 years ago

      “The team who gets Machado better hope he signs with them”

      If the price paid reflects that then you have a Front Office that is incompetent and needs to be cleaned out.

      Machado is a two month rental and whatever is sent to the Orioles should reflect that and nothing more.

      In addition, Zach Britton is completely worthless so tossing him in means nothing. Everything going to Baltimore is 100% for two months of Machado.

      2
      Reply
      • Bruin1012

        7 years ago

        Completely disagree that Britton is completely worthless.

        3
        Reply
      • stl_cards16 2

        7 years ago

        Yep. And even if the team that trades for him does re sign him, they still traded for 2 months of him.

        1
        Reply
      • Wally-the-green-monster

        7 years ago

        Worthless is a strong statement. He’s pitched better recently.

        1
        Reply
      • raef715

        7 years ago

        if Zach Britton is completely worthless, then what is the proper description for for Adam Morgan right now?
        if the Phils are going to get Machado, may as well get Britton as well.

        Reply
      • osfandan

        7 years ago

        You are wrong on too many things for me to correct.

        I’ll focus on Britton….as many as 8 teams have made offers. So yeah, not worthless.

        2
        Reply
      • vtadave

        7 years ago

        Britton has been lights out in his last seven outings and has been beyond elite when healthy. He has plenty of value.

        Reply
      • sals029

        7 years ago

        Britton is obviously not worthless, some will give up a reasonable amount of capital for him.

        Reply
        • cecildawg

          7 years ago

          Some, use words as thrown stones. ‘Worthless’ is just such a word. We often times call others what we are. We are too close to ourselves to have a proper prospective. Nothing to be ashamed about. We all do this. The elimination of name calling might be a good place to start that arduous journey towards self- actualization. Just saying..

          2
          Reply
        • Michael Chaney

          7 years ago

          Gandhi, is that you?

          1
          Reply
      • RedRooster

        7 years ago

        Casey is right in this instance. If you are trading for Machado, you are trading for the amount of control he comes with. You don’t give up extra value in the trade because you think you’ll be able to sign him.

        2
        Reply
      • mgrap84

        7 years ago

        Britton is far from worthless. He can instantly help any bullpen

        1
        Reply
      • mstrchef13

        7 years ago

        Dude, Did Casey used to work for the O’s and got fired? Is that why you have such anger with them? Nothing else seems to explain your repeated comments about how bad the O’s players are, all completely wrong by the way. The team isn’t good but they have some good players that other teams want, and you sound like a bitter old “get off my lawn” kinda man about it.

        1
        Reply
      • Phillies2017

        7 years ago

        Worthless is a strong word, but I wouldn’t want him. He’s financially expensive and has a long history of injury issues while struggling with his control the past 2 years. Not a bad pitcher, but not somebody I’m willing to trade for at this time. I’d much rather get Familia.

        Reply
    • oldleftylong

      7 years ago

      The Phillies are in phirst place. The Manny makes them a legit contender for the WS.

      Reply
      • Gavin B

        7 years ago

        Haha your kidding….right?

        Reply
        • DannyQ3913

          7 years ago

          They’re legit. Line up Nola and Arietta against any other top 2 NL playoff starters.

          Reply
        • Gavin B

          7 years ago

          I’m not saying there a bad team by any means, but 2 starters is not a thing to be so excited about… a lineup like the Cubs or Brewers would do plenty damage against those two….

          Reply
    • outinleftfield

      7 years ago

      The first place Phillies are not ready to compete? OK. If you say so.

      1
      Reply
      • Gavin B

        7 years ago

        Did I say they weren’t ready to compete? Look more carefully. I just don’t agree they are a WS contender. Good team, but not a WS contender

        Reply
  9. Dtownbrown608

    7 years ago

    David Stearns ima never forgive you for this if you do.

    Reply
    • ohmy

      7 years ago

      For Stearns TO trade for Machado or NOT to?

      1
      Reply
      • Dtownbrown608

        7 years ago

        Hell no.

        1
        Reply
  10. 1988wasalongtimeago

    7 years ago

    Pull the trigger already

    Reply
  11. Djones246890

    7 years ago

    I’m really tired of hearing about this.

    Reply
  12. dkramer

    7 years ago

    Anyone else nauseated by the Machado watch? This is up there with “the decision”. Just get the trade done already so we can move on. FTR my pick is the Phils.

    Reply
    • osfandan

      7 years ago

      Try having the next few years of your franchise rest on it…

      2
      Reply
    • BlueSkyLA

      7 years ago

      I’m wondering why anyone would read MLBTR and say they are sick of seeing MLBTR.

      10
      Reply
      • dkramer

        7 years ago

        Cause you can only regurgitate the same article in so many ways before it gets redundant.

        Reply
        • tharrie0820

          7 years ago

          I kind agree. should probably just add updates to existing articles instead of making a new article every 7.2 hours. especially when it’s never anything new

          Reply
        • aceofrainbows

          7 years ago

          Well I guess it lets more people comment and have conversations if the comments reset. I don’t want to scroll all the way down the article.

          Still dumb though.

          Reply
      • RedRooster

        7 years ago

        Because they haven’t told us anything we didn’t already know regarding Manny Machado since like December.

        Reply
        • BlueSkyLA

          7 years ago

          Now that certainly isn’t true. In December Machado wasn’t even available, and by no means were we talking about trading partners let alone them being apparently narrowed down to three likely teams. Even if it was true, this is still a rumors site, so if you find the reporting of rumors to be tedious or troubling it wouldn’t be difficult to avoid the personal distress you seem to be experiencing.

          5
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          He was available. The Orioles didn’t trade him because they weren’t satisfied with what was being offered.

          Reply
        • BlueSkyLA

          7 years ago

          And of course the Dodgers were totally in at that point because…?

          You’ve been predicting all along that he would not be traded, so it seems to me now that it appears highly likely that he will be traded, you’ve kind of backed yourself into a corner.

          4
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          I’m not going to believe that he’ll be traded until he is. Peter Angelos will have some bogus reason to veto the deal.

          Reply
        • orioles667083

          7 years ago

          Oh he is gone, it’s a shame it couldn’t be trade now, get pieces and bring him back…this team only coughs up money for guys that fail…Glenn Davis, Albert Belle, Ubaldo Jimenez and Chris Davis..did I miss anyone

          Reply
  13. lowtalker1

    7 years ago

    Nothing will be official until after the asg.

    1
    Reply
  14. mack22 2

    7 years ago

    An arm & a leg for a 2 month rental? As long as it’s not the Dodgers I don’t care

    1
    Reply
    • Takachulo

      7 years ago

      As a Dodger fan, I agree with this.

      Reply
    • atomicfront

      7 years ago

      Yeah the Dodgers probably finish fourth in their division even with Machado.

      1
      Reply
  15. Ryan Hilson

    7 years ago

    David Stearns walk away unless you have a deal in place to resign him

    1
    Reply
    • tharrie0820

      7 years ago

      I’m sure he is both reading MLBTR comments and also comes here for advice

      3
      Reply
    • RedRooster

      7 years ago

      If re-signing him is a must for you then just wait until the offseason. Trading for him isn’t going to make it any easier.

      Reply
      • start_wearing_purple

        7 years ago

        Not necessarily. By average age the Phillies have the second youngest team in the league. By trading for Machado the Phillies might hope Machado will see himself as a leader of a potential dynasty.

        1
        Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          No smart front office would trade top 100 prospects to MAYBE have a marginally better chance of signing a guy.

          Reply
        • start_wearing_purple

          7 years ago

          Trading for Machado moves the Phillies from a below average offensive team to at least an average one. Trading for Machado bolsters the Phils chances to not just make the playoffs but to go further in them. A couple of months extra trying to prove to Machado that Philly is the place he wants to be for the next 10 years would be icing on the cake. for the Phils.

          1
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          It sounds to me like getting him long-term is a must for the Phillies, which trading for him simply doesn’t do.

          Reply
        • start_wearing_purple

          7 years ago

          I don’t see getting Machado to sign long term is a must for the Phillies. The Phillies wouldn’t be the first team to make a gamble that an expensive 2-3 month rental could be what their team needs to win a WS.

          All I’m saying is I believe if you take into account the Phillies team age, how well they’ve done this season, and the likelihood that they have a lot of financial resources to throw around that the Phillies might see Macahdo as a boost for this season as well as a way to get their foot in the door to sign him long term after he declares for FA. The Phillies might be willing to go a little extra now if they believe in the offseason that if they offer the same money as another team that Machado might choose to stay in Philly because he potentially likes it there.

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          So basically you are saying that giving up a top 100 prospect is a prerequisite for outbidding everyone else for Machado.

          Reply
        • proof2006

          7 years ago

          No one said that. You’re talking about different things. The prospects have nothing to do with the contract. Obviously you personally know Manny, and know he can’t be influenced by playing for a team in the playoffs this year.

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          Yes I do know him and no he can’t be influenced by that.

          Reply
        • start_wearing_purple

          7 years ago

          Now I’m not sure if you just don’t want to read what I’ve said or you’re just deliberately misstating my point. So let’s break it down even further:

          1) The Phillies are a young team that was supposed to not be playoff viable for 2 years however they’re right now they have a good shot at the playoffs.
          2) One big problem is their offense.
          3) A top offense rental is on the market that could give the Phillies a stronger chance at not just making the playoffs but also making it further than the WC or DS.
          4) The Phillies are also a team that have spent vast amounts of money in the past and have been rumored to be waiting to spend some time soon.
          5) Machado is barely 26 and a solid player, the kind a team with resources might want to make a centerpiece of their franchise.
          6a) So if the Phillies already see Machado as a good upgrade this year and 6b) A potential target for the future then 6c) There might be some additional motive to get him in a Phillies uniform with the hopes that winning in Philly with a team where he’s a leader will tip the scales when 6d) The offseason arrives and the team needs to not just pitch him on the money but also on the ambiance.

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          Again. 6c) and 6d) are not the type of thing you trade a top 100 prospect in baseball for. If the Phillies do trade Machado and he signs elsewhere after this season I expect to see ZERO Phillies fans complaining about it on here. And him signing won’t justify the trade unless you can prove that he wouldn’t have signed if they hadn’t traded for him.

          Reply
      • stymeedone

        7 years ago

        All of the teams that are looking now see him as helping now. Some also see where signing him could help next year and beyond. Nobody in play is only hoping to sign him for next year.

        2
        Reply
  16. yanks02026

    7 years ago

    Starting to think this handshake agreement is probably true. The big trade rumor guys haven’t said a word lately about machado. Which is odd considering they’ve tweeted nonstop about machado in the last week

    Reply
    • RedRooster

      7 years ago

      Why would the Orioles want to do a handshake agreement? Sounds pointless to me.

      Reply
      • start_wearing_purple

        7 years ago

        A handshake agreement is pretty much meaningless. It’s possible the O’s have the framework of a deal in place that just needs tweaking or their waiting until Wednesday to announce or it could all be a leak to get in final bids from other teams. Until an actual announcement is made there is no trade.

        3
        Reply
  17. bobtillman

    7 years ago

    I’m upset because MLBTR is taking up space about Machado rumors instead of Blake Swihart rumors…….

    Reply
    • aceofrainbows

      7 years ago

      Yes, but does Blake Swihart draw rave reviews at catcher or the outfield?

      Reply
  18. Leemitt

    7 years ago

    I see a three team trade: Machado goes to the Cowboys, DeMarcus Lawrence goes to the Nuggets, and Isaiah Thomas goes to the Orioles. Who says no?

    Reply
    • Michael Chaney

      7 years ago

      I guess you could say the Orioles would get the short end of that deal

      Reply
    • jeffk-2

      7 years ago

      Replace Thomas with mutumbo and you got a deal.

      Reply
  19. marijuasher

    7 years ago

    Barstool Sports = Toilet Bowl Content

    4
    Reply
    • driftcat28 2

      7 years ago

      Facts

      1
      Reply
  20. cecildawg

    7 years ago

    Some, use words as thrown stones. ‘Worthless’ is just such a word. We often times call others what we are. We are too close to ourselves to have a proper prospective. Nothing to be ashamed about. We all do this. The elimination of name calling might be a good place to start that arduous journey towards self- actualization. Just saying.

    Reply
  21. mike156

    7 years ago

    Terrific player, but unless the acquirer wins the World Series, whatever the price is will be seen as an overpay

    Reply
    • augold5

      7 years ago

      Not necessarily, who knows if the prospects sent in the deal will be productive MLB players. Also, for a small market team like the Brewers, making the world series or even the playoffs can play huge divadends

      1
      Reply
      • augold5

        7 years ago

        Dividends*

        Reply
      • RedRooster

        7 years ago

        O contrair, when you trade for a rental, the only way the trade is a positive is if you win the World Series. Even if the prospects are all busts it’s not like you are better off from the trade.

        Reply
        • BlueSkyLA

          7 years ago

          The purpose of a rental is to help a team to whatever title they are able to achieve. This could be the stretch run to winning a division, the division series, the league series, or the World Series. Ideally the big prize is the goal as it is for every team but to say that a team gets no benefit from a rental unless they go all the way is totally arbitrary.

          5
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          No BlueSkyLA. You’re wrong. How much heat do you think Jed Hoyer would have gotten for the Chapman trade if the Cubs hadn’t won the World Series that year? It’s the same way with Machado. Especially because a lot of fans seem to have some delusional idea that trading for him will ensure that he signs there come the offseason.

          Reply
        • Aaron Sapoznik

          7 years ago

          The Chapman rental trade to the Cubs and any potential fallout from not winning the World Series was a unique situation to the North Side of Chicago. The team hadn’t won a championship in 108 years and most Cubs fan would have been more forgiving to the front office if they failed to win the title after the deal was consummated.

          Many fans, like myself, would have also put any blame squarely on manager Joe Maddon for his questionable strategies in the postseason including some ill-advised use of Chapman in the World Series versus the Indians. The FO had also already taken some heat from segments of its fan base when the trade came down at the deadline because of Chapman’s domestic violence issue in which he had already received a suspension from MLB as a member of the Reds.

          Finally, the Cubs had zero intention of signing Chapman as a free agent following the 2016 season. That won’t be the case for most contenders interested in acquiring Machado now, especially a team like the Phillies who have long been considered a strong potential landing spot for Machado as a FA this coming offseason.

          4
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          If the goal is to get him signed long-term then there’s no point in giving up top 100 prospects on top of that. He’s not going to be any cheaper if you trade for him first.

          Reply
        • El Duderino

          7 years ago

          Nobody is saying he’ll be cheaper by trading for him now. People have implied that if three teams all offer him a 400 million dollar contract, he might be more willing to stay with the team with which he already has experience.

          4
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          “MIGHT?” You don’t give up top 100 prospects for a MIGHT! Especially when the Phillies still have to give him $400m anyway.

          Reply
        • augold5

          7 years ago

          Of course winning the world series is the ultimate benefit of a rental trade, but even making the playoffs for a franchise like the brewers would still help bring in revenue and show other players in FA next off season that the FO is willing to do anything to win. For a franchise like the Yankees or Red Sox anything but winning the world series would seem as a failure but not for a small market team. You cannot compare the Cubs to the Brewers either, two different fan bases, markets and history. Also , we don’t know what the prospect package will look like. If its headlined by a AAA OF like Brett Phillips who likely wouldn’t have more than 100 AB’s over the next two years with the Brewers because of the glut of OF’s then I strongly disagree with a WS or bust mentality. If they give up Burnes or Peralta, then yes the expectations will be higher. No matter what package is given up though, a WS appearance would still be seen as a success in the eyes of any Brewer fan(including myself). They have only been to one WS in their entire existence as a franchise

          2
          Reply
        • proof2006

          7 years ago

          No point in arguing with him. Making the playoffs would be huge for the Phillies. This season was support be a wash before the season started. Getting to the playoffs and causing a buzz to put fans in the seats is a huge part of why the Phillies should aquire him. No one is worried about winning a ws this year in Philly. The team was expected to be battling for 3rd place in the division.

          3
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          And what is going to happen to those fans when Machado leaves after one half-season?

          Reply
        • augold5

          7 years ago

          I don’t know any brewer fans that are going in with an expectation to sign him after this season. They don’t have the payroll to afford a 30M/yr player especially with Braun and Cain taking up 40M next season.

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          No team’s fans should expect that they will be able to sign him

          Reply
        • augold5

          7 years ago

          Ok, so then they shouldn’t be disappointed if the Brewers make the playoffs or WS, meaning the trade would not be a “bust”

          Reply
        • Ryan Hilson

          7 years ago

          Cain is only making 14 million next year and Braun at 19 million so that’s not quite 40 million also total payroll is at 106 million this year so in theory they could but shouldn’t

          Reply
        • Cat Mando

          7 years ago

          redrooster (who sounds suspiciously like WestCoastRyan)…..Since you are bound and determined to “prove” to everyone that you and only you are right I would like to point out a few things.
          You and only you have used the term “prerequisite”.(look up the definition) No one else has said it is a must in signing him long term. A few have stated it may help and have provided examples of players who resigned because they liked the experience and you (as WCR always did) dismissed it. You have no absolute proof that It won’t help, only your opinion. It is also only your opinion that “the only way the trade is a positive is if you win the World Series.” You do not know the reason or thought process for each team vying for his services, even though you believe you do.
          Lastly it’s “au contraire”, not “O contrair”. Have a nice day, I won’t be responding directly to any of your gascon comments.

          2
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          @Cat Mando wow, it must have been hard for you exhausting your entire vocabulary in one comment!
          Please never breed.

          Reply
  22. Michael Chaney

    7 years ago

    If Jim Bowden says he’ll get traded this week I expect him to stay put and turn down a qualifying offer

    1
    Reply
  23. stymeedone

    7 years ago

    What if all the teams bidding refuse to trade an arm and a leg, and the Orioles have to accept the best finger and toe offered? Will it be an overpay then?

    Reply
    • outinleftfield

      7 years ago

      If they don’t get what they want, they keep him, offer the QO at the end of the season and take their draft pick.

      Reply
      • RedRooster

        7 years ago

        I think Machado is good enough that he should net a better return than that comp pick even as a rental. Wouldn’t surprise me to see the Orioles take the comp pick anyway tho.

        Reply
    • Jbigz12

      7 years ago

      Then the teams who choose not to pay can “upgrade” their lineup with Brian dozier.

      Reply
  24. chound

    7 years ago

    Phillies makes the most sense hands down. They were already the most likely team to land him in FA.

    3
    Reply
    • RedRooster

      7 years ago

      Nope becuase signing him and trading for him are separate and irrelevant transactions. The Phillies seem more interested in getting him long-term which trading for him doesn’t do.

      Reply
      • augold5

        7 years ago

        You act like these players have no emotion and are robots. No one is saying Muchado will sign for 50M less with the team he is traded to, but if he likes or dislikes the city/FO/players during his time on whatever team he is traded to, that will have influence if the proposed contracts this off season are similar. I agree with you that the trade should only be with the idea of having Muchado for this season, but the two are not irrelevant of each other.

        2
        Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          I know it CAN have an influence on him in free agency but that influence can just as easily be a bad one and the small chance of it saving you maybe $5m in free agency is not worth the prospects Machado will cost. No smart front office will ever trade for a player because they think it will make it easier to sign him and it seems like the Phillies are more interested in getting him long-term than anything.

          Reply
        • augold5

          7 years ago

          Did you not read my comment?… you’re arguing with yourself at this point. Never once did I say the influence was only positive or that a FO would trade for him simply to be able to sign him in the off season.

          1
          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          Ah, so we are in agreement. In that case, trading for Machado only makes sense if you genuinely think you can contend for a World Series in 2018.

          Reply
        • augold5

          7 years ago

          Correct??… which teams trying to get Machado are not contending for a WS? The NL is wide open. The Phillies, Brewers and Dodgers would definitely be WS contenders with Machado. In the Brewers case though I think just making a deep playoff run is also a reason to trade for Machado,

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          But reports I’ve read and comments on this site seem to indicate that the Phillies are more interested in getting him long-term which trading for him doesn’t do. And I’ve seen at least one person within the last month suggest that the White Sox trade for Machado in order to gain an advantage in signing him.

          Reply
        • jleve618

          7 years ago

          I think they have a much better chance with him than without. Next year the east will be alot better, this year the window is cracked.

          Reply
        • augold5

          7 years ago

          So one delusional fan says something and that means its the general opinion? The first priority for trading for Machado is on winning this season…….Then, after the season’s over with, the FO can be hopeful he enjoyed his time during this season and hope that influences him to sign there instead of with a team like the Yankees(with a similar contract proposed). No team is trading for Machado, assuming he will sign with them.

          Reply
        • RedRooster

          7 years ago

          “The first priority for trading for Machado is on winning this season.”
          It’s the ONLY priority.
          “Then, after the season’s over with, the FO can be hopeful he enjoyed his time during this season and hope that influences him to sign there instead of with a team like the Yankees(with a similar contract proposed).”
          If it does give them an advantage (which isn’t necessarily true and can also backfire) it would only be something like $5m. Not the type of thing you trade a top 100 prospect plus more for.

          Reply
        • augold5

          7 years ago

          The advantage isn’t being able to sign him for less, its getting him to sign with your team instead of another for the same amount of money. Also its a trial run to see if he fits with your team. If personalities or playing styles clash, then its better to figure that out now instead of after signing him for 300M. I didn’t say trade a T100 prospect just to have a possible advantage on signing him. I’m saying trade your prospects for an all-star SS/3B to win this year, and that there are possible bonuses of having a player on your roster prior to them hitting the open market. Its called looking at the whole picture, its lumped into the entirety of what you’re getting and it has to be considered when GM’s are trading.

          1
          Reply
  25. Gavin B

    7 years ago

    The writer was payed by the O’s to write this so the dodgers and brewers will up their offers

    Reply
    • orioles667083

      7 years ago

      Orioles front office is not that smart

      1
      Reply
      • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

        7 years ago

        When their president of operations name is mcfail. That’s very evident.

        Reply
      • outinleftfield

        7 years ago

        You got that right. The O’s can’t even figure out how to sign Latin players as international free agents.

        1
        Reply
  26. dave1775

    7 years ago

    Manny tears his Achilles tonight and Balt is screwed lol

    Reply
  27. driftcat28 2

    7 years ago

    Who would believe Barstool

    1
    Reply
    • yanks02026

      7 years ago

      The one barstool guy had a “source” that said the yankees were close to a deal last week. These guys know nothing

      Reply
  28. ThatBallwasBryzzoed

    7 years ago

    Mid game trade to philly. Switches uniforms. Walk off PH home run for the NL.

    Reply
  29. jlahman

    7 years ago

    Orioles are gonna trade him for a boat load of future stars, then resign him in the off season! 😉

    1
    Reply
  30. Phillies2017

    7 years ago

    I’m in the minority here, but I think the Phillies should pursue Lowrie over the offseason assuming he becomes available. Considerably less expensive and a good veteran mentor to Crawford and Kingery (who lets not forget are still rookies).
    As I’ve said before, you can’t take away what Machado is- a star- but the prospects on top of a 10-year $300-$400 million deal when he has shown inconsistencies in plate discipline throughout his career is scary.
    If you look at the players who remain even somewhat relevant through their late 30’s early 40’s, were talking .080-.2 isolated on base percentages. Manny’s a career .054. When the bat starts to go, towards the back half of the contract, and it will, he doesn’t have the plate discipline to cushion his OPS. Even if it’s only the last three years, that’s $120 million.
    After watching this team suffocate under bad contract among bad contract, you can imagine my skepticism.

    1
    Reply
    • raef715

      7 years ago

      get your point, but Phils fans arent going to rush out to buy tickets and Jed Lowrie tickets…and what position are you playing him at?

      Reply
  31. DannyQ3913

    7 years ago

    CBS Philly reported tonight that Wednesday trade to Philly is happening

    Reply
  32. waylonmercy

    7 years ago

    The Orioles have a handshake agreement with Philadelphia Then the top prospects going to Baltimore will be riding the bench until the deal is announced. If those players are playing tonight then we know the rumor is bogus.

    1
    Reply
    • Coast1

      7 years ago

      Interesting conjecture. Here’s who did and didn’t play tonight.

      Cole Irvin pitched in AAA. Fast rising lefty who can pitch in the big leagues now.

      Zach Green didn’t play tonight. 24 year old 1B-3B who was a dud but has blossomed this year.

      Franklyn Kilome started for AA. Has been regarded as the team’s #3 starting pitching prospect after Sanchez and Medina.

      Austin Listi didn’t play tonight at AA. He’s also a 24 year old 1B-OF. He was drafted last year at age 23 but has torn through the system.

      Arquimedes Gamboa has been mentioned in a possible deal but he played tonight.

      Jhailyn Ortiz has also been mentioned but he played at Lakewood tonight. It’d be hard to see them giving up both Medina and Ortiz for Machado.

      Reply
      • waylonmercy

        7 years ago

        If Baltimore and Philadelphia had a handshake deal on Muchado some of the Phillies top prospects would have been conspicuous by their absence tonight. All of their prospects have been accounted for so I tend to believe the barstool report was erroneous.

        Reply
  33. waylonmercy

    7 years ago

    Not sure why my comment was posted three times.

    Reply
    • Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA

      7 years ago

      It happens when using the phone app. You see the comment three times, but you only posted it once.

      Reply
    • jleve618

      7 years ago

      I’ve had one go 4 times before, that was cool.

      Reply
  34. Bubba 5

    7 years ago

    Stop posting it NOBODY CARES ANYMORE

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      7 years ago

      You know what, Napoleon, you can leave.

      3
      Reply
    • outinleftfield

      7 years ago

      Obviously, you do. You are here.

      Reply
  35. CardsNation5

    7 years ago

    Any team that traders for SS Machado is stupid. He’s horrible at the position and has two bad knees. He’s better off at 3rd base. Any team that lets him stay at SS is desperate.

    Reply
  36. CardsNation5

    7 years ago

    Then on top of the fact what type of player are you gonna get away from Camden?

    Reply
    • Jbigz12

      7 years ago

      I’m sure the hitter friendly confines of citizen bank will do just fine for MM. Camden Yards doesn’t make MM the player he is. No one thinks that.

      Reply
  37. RedRooster

    7 years ago

    At the end of the day, answer this question: If you knew 100% that Machado is not going to sign with you come the offseason, would you still trade for him? Would you still offer the same package in a trade for him? If the answer is no, then don’t do it.

    Reply
    • dpierson10

      7 years ago

      Agreed 100%. That title though. Don’t think that’s the only piece philly is missing. But a hell of a haul and the nl is weak this year.

      Reply
    • koldjerky

      7 years ago

      Would I still trade for him? Yes
      Would I still offer the same package? No

      If you 100% knew he wasn’t coming back in the off season you severely lighten the offer.

      The caveat would be to not get in a bidding war. The Phillies aren’t at the point they’re one or two pieces away so giving up the rumored package would be silly if he wasn’t coming back HOWEVER I do feel the Phillies have as good a chance as anyone to re-sign him.

      Reply
  38. dewssox79

    7 years ago

    it has to be the phillies. i think LA would be the favorite to go to the WS if they got him.

    Reply
  39. rgreen

    7 years ago

    Hernandez
    Machado
    Herrera
    Hoskins
    Santana
    Franco/Kingery
    Williams
    Alfaro

    Some nice potential in that lineup right there

    Reply
    • WubbaLubbaDubDub

      7 years ago

      The order isn’t right…but he would definitely help even out the lineup.

      Reply
      • Jbigz12

        7 years ago

        He’s a huge boost to the lineup but it’s still not a top 5 offense. Barely a top 10.

        Reply
  40. dpierson10

    7 years ago

    What are we thinking here as a GM. For a rental just to be clear. Medina, Ortiz, lively and moniak. Help me out guys. Just trying to think what the trade may be. Philly fans are solid. I’m an astros fan and waiting to see this play out. Keep him away from the yanks or Sox even though would be nice to beat them with him on those rosters.

    Reply
    • Coast1

      7 years ago

      I don’t see it them trading Medina and Ortiz in a deal for Machado since he’s a rental. Moniak’s value is at a low point. He’s the fourth player in your deal. The Phillies would be smarter to hold on him. The Phillies have a lot of pitching depth and would probably prefer most or all the players to be pitchers. Connor Seabold, Drew Anderson, Cole Irvin, and JoJo Romero are names to watch.

      Don’t dismiss the two players who didn’t play tonight. Green was 2nd in the Eastern League in home runs when he got promoted and Listi is carrying a huge bat this year. The Orioles love sluggers and most of theirs are near the end.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Red Sox To Promote Roman Anthony

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Recent

    Red Sox To Promote Roman Anthony

    Red Sox Designate Robert Stock For Assignment, Select Brian Van Belle

    Trade Rumors Front Office Subscriber Chat: Today At 2pm CT

    Rich Hill Has June 15 Opt-Out In Royals Deal

    AJ Smith-Shawver Undergoes Tommy John Surgery

    Poll: What Will The Rangers Do At The Deadline?

    Mets Select Justin Garza

    Submit Your Questions For This Week’s Episode Of The MLBTR Podcast

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    The Opener: Phillies, Wade, Perez, Dodgers, Padres

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version