Headlines

  • Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow
  • Astros To Promote Brice Matthews
  • Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers
  • Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help
  • Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays
  • Yankees Release DJ LeMahieu
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

BoSox Owner John Henry: “We’re Not Going To Be Looking To Add A Lot Of Payroll” This Season

By Mark Polishuk | June 30, 2019 at 11:00pm CDT

“If we play up to our capabilities we will easily make the playoffs. That’s how I see it,” Red Sox principal owner John Henry told WEEI.com’s Rob Bradford in London this weekend before Boston’s two-game series with the Yankees.  The Sox dropped both of those games to fall 11 games behind New York in the AL East standings, and two games out of an AL wild card slot.

At just 44-40 on the season, the Sox are far behind the pace set by their 2018 World Series team, which won 108 games in the regular season and then went 11-3 in the playoffs to capture the franchise’s fourth Commissioner’s Trophy since 2004.  The Red Sox haven’t won back-to-back titles, however, and Henry noted that following up a championship run has been a challenge.

While this year’s Red Sox seem decidedly better than the 2014 team that finished in the AL East basement, Henry noted that in both 2014 and 2019, the club didn’t make many roster alternations over the winter.

“My take is that maybe it isn’t the best thing in the world to bring back the same team in its entirety every time,” Henry said.  “You don’t want to break a team down.  But maybe a few changes wouldn’t hurt.  But the feeling is always different after you win, apparently.”

On paper, there wasn’t really too much for the Sox to address over their quiet offseason, though their lack of bullpen depth was seen as a problem in March and has blossomed into a full-blown concern as we enter July.  While Boston’s bullpen and starting pitchers still rank in the top half of the league in most statistical categories (Sox relievers lead the league in K/9), both have been prone to breakdowns at inopportune times.  The rotation has been largely carried by David Price and Chris Sale, the latter of whom has looked like his traditionally dominant self after a subpar April.  But Rick Porcello and Eduardo Rodriguez haven’t pitched well, while the fifth starter’s spot has been a revolving door of shaky performances since Nathan Eovaldi has spent much of the year on the injured list.

A possible answer to these problems, of course, is a big addition or two at the trade deadline, though the Red Sox won’t have much room to maneuver if they are to stay under the $246MM threshold for the maximum luxury tax penalty.  The Sox passed this threshold last season, costing the team a little under $12MM in tax payments and a 10-spot drop for their first selection in the 2019 draft.

Between Porcello, Rodriguez, Eovaldi, the injured Dustin Pedroia, underperforming veterans Steve Pearce and Eduardo Nunez, and the $30MM+ in dead money still on the books for Rusney Castillo and Pablo Sandoval, the Sox have roughly $100MM committed to players who have combined for only +0.6 fWAR in 2019.

It should be noted that as per the calculations from Roster Resource’s Jason Martinez, the Sox are again in position to surpass the $246MM threshold, with an estimated luxury tax number of roughly $251.4MM.  If the team is indeed over the line with little hope of getting under the $246MM, one could argue that the Red Sox might as well go ahead and spend more in an all-out push for another World Series.  MLBTR’s Steve Adams outlined Boston’s financial restraints back in February, and while the Red Sox would face an even stiffer penalty for passing the $246MM limit in consecutive years, a big-market team like Boston is more suited to handling such extra expenses.

This doesn’t appear likely, however, as Henry doesn’t see spending (or a perceived lack of spending) as the problem.

“It’s not a luxury tax issue, it’s a question of how much money do we want to lose,” Henry said.  “We’re already over budget and we were substantially over our budget last year and this year. We’re not going to be looking to add a lot of payroll. And it’s hard to imagine fielding a better team. If we play up to our capabilities we’ll be fine. That’s the question: Will we? We’re halfway through and we haven’t….It’s a worthy team because we invested. Two years in a row we have the highest payroll. It’s not a matter of investment, it’s a matter of playing well.“

Share 0 Retweet 15 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox John Henry

MLBTR Chat Transcript: Red Sox, All-Star Game, Mancini, Myers
Main
Minor MLB Transactions: 6/30/19
View Comments (103)
Post a Comment

103 Comments

  1. Jbigz12

    6 years ago

    “but the feeling is different after you win, apparently” That sounds like a shot at DD and the FO for spending his money on bringing back Pearce and Eovaldi to me.

    1
    Reply
    • pasha2k

      6 years ago

      Nate gave up his health to help the Sox win the WS. Pearce has been legit hurt n why he hasn’t produced. The problem is the fat Panda who stole the money n ate himself outta a role in Boston. Didn’t he go public before about finances before?

      3
      Reply
      • Jbigz12

        6 years ago

        I’m not claiming that Eovaldi and Pearce are the Red Sox worst financial decisions by any means. I’m just talking about his quote here. Pedroia, Sandoval, and Rusney are stinging a lot more than 2 guys who could still potential help this team.

        2
        Reply
        • AM21

          6 years ago

          Castillo could be helping if they put him on the roster. Pedroia’s dollar hit is nothing compared to what he gave that organization. The Pearce signing was awful and Panda was even worse.

          Reply
      • tharrie0820

        6 years ago

        Panda didn’t “steal” anything. Boston willingly gave him that money

        1
        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          6 years ago

          “Panda didn’t “steal” anything. Boston willingly gave him that money”

          It was certainly a self-inflicted wound, but if someone was charging you $100/hour to fix your roof, and 30 minutes of every hour was spent climbing up and down the ladder, because he was 300 pounds, it feels like he is ‘stealing’ at least a little of that money.

          OTOH, since the RS apparently think he had 17% body fat, then they have lost all sympathy, imo. Dude probably had 30 of fat on top of my 20 pounds of fat, and I am pretty certain I’m not particularly close to 17% body fat.

          It was an insult to my intelligence.

          1
          Reply
        • pasha2k

          6 years ago

          The Redsox gave Panda money n it is HIS responsibility to give them what they paid for. Baseball can’t return a faulty product. The Redsox have him money in good faith, n he showed no good faith.

          1
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          6 years ago

          “The Redsox gave Panda money n it is HIS responsibility to give them what they paid for.”

          The problem, as it often is, is that the RS paid for a fat player with declining stats. And that’s what they got. It shouldn’t have been as bad as it turned out, He went from a .909 OPS, to .789, to .758 to ..739.

          What is a guy with a .739, with -0- speed, and -0- lateral movement, worth?

          It reminds me of the SFG signing Zito, who was coming off a horrible 1.53 K/W and a bad 4.89 FIP. And then being surprised when he gave them a horrible 1.58 K/W and a bad 4.82 FIP.

          Reply
      • Yankeepride88

        6 years ago

        How did he steal money? The Red Sox were stupid for signing him to that deal in the first place.

        Reply
    • Matt_Angel_Bronco_Laker

      6 years ago

      I read that as more of a shot at the players, not DD or the front office.

      Reply
    • SG

      6 years ago

      No, it sounds like there’s no point in throwing good money after bad to me.

      Reply
  2. mcase7187

    6 years ago

    I get what he’s saying but dude look at the pen they are garbage top to bottom not one bright spot in the bunch

    1
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      6 years ago

      “I get what he’s saying but dude look at the pen they are garbage top to bottom not one bright spot in the bunch”

      To say they needed a closer is fair. But Barnes, Brasier, and Workman are all quality RPs. Like I said in the off-season, those 3 are fine 6-7-8 inning guys, just not closers.

      It’s also not their fault that, through a combination of lack of quality backups, that those three are in every RS victory, combined by a rather idiotic ‘starter’ philosophy to replace Eovaldi.

      1
      Reply
  3. Sin65

    6 years ago

    what team are you watching John Henry this team is trash top to bottom. They are not making the playoffs with that bullpen or rotation they need to spend some money if they want to fix this team this year.

    3
    Reply
    • Down with OBP

      6 years ago

      Is he watching the same team that won last year? It’s amazing how quickly a team turns to trash I guess.

      1
      Reply
      • kenleyfornia2

        6 years ago

        Not trash, just more in line with what they were in 2016/2017. Solid team but not on the super status they were last year

        1
        Reply
        • thefenwayfaithful 2

          6 years ago

          There’s a few factors for those of us that watch the games.

          1) Bullpen – Starting with the obvious, this bullpen is not constructed in a way that works in 2019. It might have slid by in ’99 when there were plenty of complete games still thrown, pitch counts weren’t in the 100s in the 6th inning. The game has changed and some owners are reluctant to spend resources on a position that they see as a graveyard for failed starters for the most part. Henry has to realize this and DD has a reputation for ignoring it.

          2) Timely Hitting – This team is still a top 10 offense in almost every category. But they aren’t doing it when it matters. Last season, they could be down 3-4 runs in the 8th and they figured out a way to win. Now even when we get a few runs, the bullpen problem above blows it. It disheartens a team, whether they admit it or not.

          3) Bad Extensions – Not saying they won’t play out well, but there was no reason to rush to extend Sale and Bogaerts at close to max value. They are both playing well, but if you look up and want to reconfigure a bit, these two contracts will hamstring anything you’re trying to do. There was no reason for it. At the dollars they paid, they probably could have gotten them back in free agency. Now you feel committed to this roster and its much harder to make a dynamic shift.

          4) The false pretense – There’s a false pretense that the Sox can’t let Betts go. Quite the contrary. Guys like Betts’ skills and size don’t tend to age all that well and I think whoever shells out 350-400 million on him will not see near that level of production. The Sox should maximize his value and trade him rather then seeing him walk away. With Sale/Price/Bogy and raises for Benintendi and Devers and Chavis becoming a probable Super Two, Pedroia’s dead weight, there are other considerations that will not allow the Sox to commit 35-40 mil annual on one more player. Betts has made clear he will test free agency.

          1
          Reply
        • Jbigz12

          6 years ago

          The Sox probably saved themselves 60 million on the Bogaerts extension. Coming off a year like this in a FA class that won’t be terribly strong would’ve been great for him. That deal is a very good one. It only runs until his age 32 season. Not something I’d get mad about. The Sale deal might not look so hot on the back end but Bogey’s deal is a pretty solid value for his performance. You had no internal replacement for him.

          1
          Reply
        • beaup14

          6 years ago

          Agree on Betts. Too inconsistent year to year to make 35-40. Trade him this year and maximize his value.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          6 years ago

          “Bad Extensions – Not saying they won’t play out well, but there was no reason to rush to extend Sale and Bogaerts at close to max value.”

          Bogaerts’ contract is one of the best in BB. I like the Sale contract as well, but you can almost tell with a pitcher.

          Reply
    • pasha2k

      6 years ago

      Sin, he’s watching his soccer team!

      Reply
  4. Lucky-Arm28

    6 years ago

    Should have shaken up the roster a bit. If they didn’t already extend Xander and Sale they could have traded them at the deadline for prospects and resigned them this off season.

    Reply
    • Laibax

      6 years ago

      Like what the yanks did with Chapman?

      Reply
      • Bostonsportsforlife

        6 years ago

        exactly. get the prospects and then resign them. only costs money, but too late now

        Reply
        • Jbigz12

          6 years ago

          That would’ve been a great theory til Bogey decides he loves LA and Sale really likes it in Philly. It’s a great theory when it works. The farm is what it is. At some point the Red Sox will have to pay the piper for the lack of talent in the pipeline but that’s a down the road issue. You only have Mookie for another year guaranteed. Sale isn’t getting any younger either. They certainly didn’t think on March 1st they’d be sellers so that’s a complete hindsight opinion to suggest they ever would’ve sold Sale or Bogey.

          Reply
        • jaysfan1994

          6 years ago

          You’re looking at it objectively, the reality is most people hit the market and ask for the most money they can earn. Offer him the most money and the guy will likely sign with that team, it’s not like the Yankees low balled Chapman.

          Pujols loved St Louis, however LA offered him the most money at 10-year, $254 million with no deferred money. St Louis meanwhile offered him 10 years and $210 million with $30M deferred,

          I can see the point of locking up someone before they hit the market, you need to be in the ballpark of an offer and sometimes GMs don’t want to deal with agents who always seem to have someone “offering more” like say A-Rod (Texas) and Chris Davis (Orioles) “had” in which reality the teams were bidding against themselves because they were too desperate for their services.

          1
          Reply
    • JoeBrady

      6 years ago

      “Should have shaken up the roster a bit. If they didn’t already extend Xander and Sale they could have traded them at the deadline for prospects and resigned them this off season.”

      1-Why would anyone trade away their stars after they just won 108 games?

      2-How much would those two have cost if we re-acquired them next winter? Sale would come back on slightly worse terms, and Bogaerts would be getting $30M per somewhere else.

      3-How many guys actually return after they’ve been traded away? Chapman did, but anyone else?

      Reply
    • RedSox4Life4ever

      6 years ago

      Red Sox were probably too scared to do that after they botched the same thing with Lester.

      Reply
  5. AtlSoxFan

    6 years ago

    What a load of €rap.

    Sox aren’t going to “lose” money, there’s insane marketing money coming into play. The reality is they cheaped out on the BP from the start. Fix it to keep butts in the seats – as the year goes on, as terms get a read on these relievers, well, you need something more

    Reply
    • iverbure

      6 years ago

      Butts in seats don’t matter and haven’t for years.

      Reply
  6. floridapinstripes

    6 years ago

    The Sox can definitely be better but they’ll probably have to strengthen their bullpen. It’ll be interesting to see what the prospect cost will be considering it doesn’t seem like they don’t want to spend much money in trades.

    2
    Reply
    • Jbigz12

      6 years ago

      Most rental relievers make 4-6 million dollars. That figure is prorated to the day they get dealt. So it’s really 2-3 million apiece on average for these guys. Will Smith is the guy they really need. Now and in the future. Might not be a bad head start to go out and get him now.

      I’m only saying that because if Boston gets in the postseason they’re still as dangerous as any team. Id give the edge to the Yanks and Houston but if they get hot at the right time and add a legitimate closer you never know. Im certainly not supporting the Red Sox just packing it in. I think they could beat any WC team in a one game series and Houston currently only has two legitimate starters (and Wade Miley).

      Reply
      • floridapinstripes

        6 years ago

        smith will probably be a tough get. Some debate a 55 prospect( I don’t think that) but at least a high end 50 , maybe 2. I didn’t realize his salary was only 4 mill. I was thinking it would be higher considering the contracts lately. I’m not saying this because I’m a Yankees fan, I think they could use him as well.

        Reply
    • Scorpion1118

      6 years ago

      The idea that the luxury tax is going to hurt is bull****. They knew the Bullpen would be an issue when they didn’t resign Kimbrel or replace him. Maybe its time the fans started to vote with there feet. Do something else with your time. If they have not made some serious moves by the trade deadline I will decide its 1995 again. Need A new past time.

      Reply
      • iverbure

        6 years ago

        Good reason for all teams to slash payrolls when you have “fans” like you.

        Reply
      • JoeBrady

        6 years ago

        “Maybe its time the fans started to vote with there feet. ”

        We’ve been the best team in BB this century, by a decent margin. This is why there are 30k+ in Fenway every night, and will continue to be so.

        However, please feel free to take your business to another team. You won’t be missed.

        Reply
  7. bobtillman

    6 years ago

    The minute he opens the Boston Globe (HIS Boston Globe) and sees the lead headline reads “Tom Brady arrives at camp”, instead of “Mookie goes 4-4”, he’ll call DD and ask him how much he needs.

    The loss of interest in the team, attendance (and all its auxiliaries, which he controls), and lower viewership for NESN FAR outweighs whatever beating he’ll take from Luxury Tax consequences, etc.

    Not saying the moves they’ll make will be the right ones; who knows? But they’ll be active.

    Reply
    • walls17

      6 years ago

      Hell, if mookie goes 4-4 at any point it should be front page news at this point

      3
      Reply
    • SG

      6 years ago

      Yes, that’s the point.
      Tom Brady is the GOAT.
      Not Mookie.

      Reply
  8. pasha2k

    6 years ago

    It’s a shame Porcello hasn’t done well cuz he’s been amazing at times like his act Young yr. cuz he wants to stay in Boston. He’s a very good #4, Edwardo is an excellent #5, on any team. The problem is the Blow-pen. They keep throwing stats at the fans, but we watch they gave so many games away, n at this point all their arms are ready to fall off. I can’t even watch the late innings anymore, it’s painfully.

    Reply
  9. KnicksFanCavsFan

    6 years ago

    They greatly overpaid for Eovaldi. Maybe it was their way of showing gratitude for his playoff help. I think they’re would be two FA signings that were sure to send time on the DL. Tulo and Eovaldi. And they let Kimbrel, and to a lesser extent..Kelly, walk without a significant replacement. I guess they feel like they won last year so no need to go over the lux tax to repeat?

    2
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      6 years ago

      “And they let Kimbrel, and to a lesser extent..Kelly, walk without a significant replacement. I guess they feel like they won last year so no need to go over the lux tax to repeat?”

      The RS can’t continue to just sign everyone. Eovaldi was too expensive, but he beat the heck out of the NYY, and that cannot be underrated.

      IRT Kelly & Kimbrel, they were asking for ridiculous money. Kelly only had one good season. Kimbrel was really good, but he took a big step backwards last year, is 31, had a 5.91 ERA in the playoffs with a 10/8 K/W, and asked for $100M+. Even with 20/20 hind sight with our need for a closer, I still would not have re-signed those two.

      1
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        6 years ago

        Im not suggesting they capitulate and overpay anyone. They were right to pass on Kimbrel but clearly could’ve replaced him for 1/3 what he was asking for. But it’s interesting you agree they overpaid for Eovaldi who basically onny had 2 good year but several dl stints in gid career but point out you passed on Kelly who only had 1 good year. I’m interested to know what the competing offers were for Eovaldi. It’s less the annual dollars that would’ve concerned me but more the years. but im a Yanks fan so eh.

        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          6 years ago

          “I’m interested to know what the competing offers were for Eovaldi.”

          We’ll probably never know. I liked Eovaldi at about $39M/3. He seemed healthy enough to get at least one good season out of him. Past that, he’s never much more than a #3, with a career 96 OPS+.

          Even in his walk year, at 8/31, his ERA was a very pedestrian 4.35. Even his RS results, to that point, were a 2-3 with a 4.50. In September, he had a 1.35 ERA, and then a legendary playoff. And that’s worth something, and I am willing to pay for it, but $68M/4 was way too high.

          For that type of money, we could’ve added 1/2 BP arms, and/or saved some money until the trading deadline.

          Reply
    • Michael Birks

      6 years ago

      Let’s be 100% clear, and they are way over the limit, they are at the third level of the luxury tax limit 246 million

      1
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        6 years ago

        i get that but they are the Red Sox fresh off a world series win. you figure it out even if it means weakening the offense to improve the pitching holes caused by Kimbrel and Kelly leaving.

        Reply
  10. astros_fan_84

    6 years ago

    What kind of window does this team have? No farm and a bunch high priced players. Clearly, they are underperforming, but I wonder how long before they turn into the Giants?

    It might make sense to go for it and just accept that the franchise might have problems later.

    1
    Reply
    • User 4245925809

      6 years ago

      I don’t see them turning into a consistent loser for awhile. SF has been and Boston hasn’t been in WELL over 50y.. Dream on if anybody thinks Boston will ever be a team that finishes bottom feeders on a continual basis.

      Reply
      • joshua.barron1

        6 years ago

        This already happened. See 2012, 2014, 2015

        2
        Reply
        • User 4245925809

          6 years ago

          Doesn’t look consecutive to me.. Get your facts correct. WS in 2013, 1st place 2016-2018. That’s not consistently bottom ranked as the team was late 50-s to early 60’s. Some teams can name find a habit of staying that way and Boston has NOT been that way for over 50y

          Reply
        • astros_fan_84

          6 years ago

          Boston has too many resources to stay at the bottom but no team contends without a farm.

          I’m just curious to see what happens.

          Reply
        • Jbigz12

          6 years ago

          Boston is heading down a path that will eventually cause them to reset. Boston with their abundance of resources shouldn’t have to rebuild more than 3 years at the Max. But at some point your going to owe a good amount of money to guys who aren’t worth it anymore. And they don’t have the farm system to pull up very good players/ all stars to make up for it like they have. There’s no Benintendi, Bogey’s, or Betts’ sitting down there and they’ll eventually pay for that. Especially once they have to pay serious dollars for or let Betts walk.

          Reply
    • JoeBrady

      6 years ago

      We have a pretty big window. Our guys under contract for 2021 and beyond:

      Vazquez
      Chavis
      Bogaerts
      Devers
      Benintendi
      JDM
      Price
      Barnes
      Hembree
      Brasier
      Johnson
      Sale
      ERod
      Eovaldi

      And those guys only cost $136M. I’m not at all concerned about our window, Having said that, I wil have more interesting remarks below.

      Reply
      • astros_fan_84

        6 years ago

        Some very players. Some that could easily fall apart.

        I’m not saying Boston is going to stink for a decade, or anything silly. But, it’s legitimate to wonder how the team will compete with old players, a barren farm, and an endless supply of cash.

        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          6 years ago

          ” a barren farm”

          We have guys, just no top 10-20 types. What we have a bunch of Michael Chavis types-fringy top-100 guys that are a little down the line.

          Casas, Dalbec, Duran, Hernadez, Groome

          I’d still trade Betts for the right set of prospects, but I’m not overly worried.

          Reply
  11. BlueSkyLA

    6 years ago

    Could you ship some of that ownership candor this way?

    Reply
  12. bigwestbaseball

    6 years ago

    This team is going no where fast. That’s a beautiful thing. The future looks bleak. Gotta love it.

    1
    Reply
  13. the guru

    6 years ago

    Red Sox gonna learn the hard way about dombrowski. Farm is gutted, no one to promote to give extra boost like Astros and Yankees have, already bumping the luxury tax payroll. His strategy works, but crushes the farm.

    2
    Reply
    • jmamone

      6 years ago

      any should have seen it coming from a mile away, just ask any Tigers fan. He doesn’t care about the draft. Sox had a top 5 farm system when he took over (Thanks to Charrington) and it’s pretty bleak now.

      2
      Reply
      • Michael Birks

        6 years ago

        That’s what happens when you graduate so many players from the minors to the big club, there’s a void in the minor leagues

        Reply
  14. muskie73

    6 years ago

    Is a Wild Card berth worth trading away longer-term assets?

    That’s the question many teams face each July.

    Just for kicks: Could the Red Sox find a taker for J.D. Martinez, Nathan Eovaldi and David Price a la the 2012 trade of Adrian Gonzalez, Josh Beckett and Carl Crawford?

    Martinez and Gonzalez have parallels, as do Eovaldi and Beckett. Price’s contract is under water but not to the degree that Crawford’s was.

    Reply
    • Michael Birks

      6 years ago

      If I’m not mistaken, the answer is no, JD Martinez and David price have no trade clauses if I remember correctly…How about trading Mookie? He’s only under contract for another year and a half, and has stated that he would not sign an extension

      1
      Reply
      • Michael Birks

        6 years ago

        And at least theoretically, he would bring back a kings ransom in return

        Reply
      • muskie73

        6 years ago

        According to Cot’s Baseball Contracts, J.D. Martinez may block trades to three teams annually while David Price apparently has no no-trade protection:

        legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/al…

        Reply
      • JoeBrady

        6 years ago

        “How about trading Mookie? ”

        Yes, unless we start playing really well.

        Reply
    • Jbigz12

      6 years ago

      This is a different age of baseball. I don’t believe a team nowadays would have considered taking that Beckett package. Now, the Giants before Zaidi got there would’ve been a prime contender to take that but I think those days are gone.

      Reply
  15. Phanatic 2022

    6 years ago

    “Rusney casillo” doesn’t count towards the 246 though

    Reply
  16. AM21

    6 years ago

    This organization doesn’t have the pieces to move to acquire established MLB relievers.

    Reply
  17. qbass187

    6 years ago

    I’ve been saying this all season. 2019 I’d sink or swim with what you have. They won in 18’ so they feel like they can let 19’ happen and wait for some big $$$ contacts to expire and then make another run.

    Reply
  18. 66TheNumberOfTheBest

    6 years ago

    There was a time when winning a championship would buy more than a half year’s worth of goodwill from the fans.

    1
    Reply
  19. walls17

    6 years ago

    Funny, the whole point of the Red Sox giving up two games in Fenway to go to London was to make money. Even after that, and coming off a championship, is the team really going to lose money?

    1
    Reply
    • ottoc 2

      6 years ago

      Didn’t I see numbers saying that MLB gave the Red Sox $7 million for moving two of their home games to London? Also, didn’t I also see that they gave each of their players $60 thousand for going over there. The club chartered a luxury airliner for the trip. That eats up a bit of the $7M.

      I never saw any figures on how the attendance money from the London games was allocated but they was a pretty large expense involved in transforming the soccer pitch into a baseball diamond. And there were all the efforts put forth to attract fans over there and also to help them understand the game. So, just how much money was made by the Red Sox?

      Reply
      • fits65

        6 years ago

        John Henry was so embarrassed that the team flew back Virgin America in coach to save money.

        Reply
  20. dlevin11

    6 years ago

    Just wait til next year seems to be the Red Sox theme for the second half of the 2019 season. I totally agree. They don’t have to win every year.

    Reply
  21. merrougemayor

    6 years ago

    This owner !!! Go rename another Street !!!

    Reply
  22. Michael Birks

    6 years ago

    If they fall completely out of contention do they trade Mookie? He’s made it clear he will not sign an extension…. I think he would bring some serious talent in a trade

    Reply
    • sorroxi

      6 years ago

      That’s not even an Option Mid Season
      I’m not opposed to Trading Mookie but Offseason if anything, teams become more flexible Luxury Tax Resetting Wise

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        6 years ago

        I wouldn’t do so, yet, but why is trading Betts to SD not a mid-season option?

        Reply
  23. mike156

    6 years ago

    Realistically, I don’t know how you would be extra-critical of John Henry. Boston could still take the Division, but adding a player doesn’t change either that a) one player on his own won’t likely be enough, and b) they have plenty of good players now, just a bit of underperformance. If the existing roster gets their act together they will be highly competitive. Regardless, unless you see a complete collapse, they will be in the playoffs, and after that, they have as good a chance as everyone else. So, are you really going to spend all that money (and prospect talent) just to make the odds a little better for a Division, so you can avoid a Wild Card playoff? Boston has had it pretty good the last 15 years…

    1
    Reply
    • dlevin11

      6 years ago

      Just like to add one player. A relief pitcher that can close out ball games in ninth inning.

      Reply
  24. bradthebluefish

    6 years ago

    Sox should sell at trade deadline and revamp for next season.

    Reply
    • Jbigz12

      6 years ago

      They have absolutely nothing to sell. All their rentals have little to no value. Porcello is making 20 million and has an ERA above 5. You aren’t getting anything for that. Pearce and Nunez are both worthless. Anything other than that is a long term piece. They either stay the course or try to add a reliever and go for it harder. Their rentals are worthless.

      Reply
  25. bostonbob

    6 years ago

    Sox if they are smart, will trade Mookie before he leaves. He will NOT resign here and go elsewhere for his HUGE contract. Take the assets and say thanks

    Reply
  26. ryanmcleod

    6 years ago

    Bye, Boston. See ya next year!

    Reply
    • luckyh

      6 years ago

      Where you going?

      Reply
  27. JoeBrady

    6 years ago

    As a long-time RS fanatic, here’s my opinion:

    I don’t mind giving them some time. If we start playing well, and get a healthy Eovaldi back. then Sale, Price, and Eovaldi can beat anyone.

    Having said that, entering the playoffs as a wildcard makes the RS about a 16-1 shot. I don’t like that, but it’s not always our prom. Taking it to the next level, if we are tied with three teams for the last playoff slot, then our chances of a WSC are about 48-1.

    If that is what it looks like in two weeks, than I’d trade both Betts & Porcello, and maybe Holt if we can’t reach an extension. I have no need to win another WSC after having won one last year. Rather than trade away precious prospects to slightly increase an outside shot this year, I’d be looking to throw caution to the wind this year, in hopes of increasing our changes over the next 5-6 years.

    To that extent, I was thinking Betts for Renfroe + a top-100 from SD.

    Reply
    • Jbigz12

      6 years ago

      If Betts is on the table you’ll net a better package than Renfroe + a top 100. I don’t know if San Diego would necessarily be the team giving out the package but I could certainly see the Dodgers offering up a package.

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        6 years ago

        Renfroe is pretty good. I’d wager that Renfroe has a higher WAR over his remaining 4.5 years than Betts over his 1.5 remaining years. I’d be pretty pleased with Renfroe, Patino, and maybe get Morejon and/or Espinoza back again.

        I’d like to dream on getting Gore, but SD would be insane to give him up in addition to Renfroe.

        Reply
  28. luckyh

    6 years ago

    It isn’t just the pen. They were actually pretty good until the last three weeks. They have been overused since day 1. It’s everybody. He was right to say that until other areas play better, investing in the pen makes no sense. The starters do just that. They are lucky to make it til the 5th. Seems like they score early and sit back after that of late. Defense is terrible. They are fat and happy, and it shows.

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      6 years ago

      I agree. I’m not sure I said it before, but I am not especially inclined to invest in this team. Last year, I was. If the 5-man rotation was killing it, and we needed a closer, it would make sense. But Sale & Price have been really good, but not great. ERod & Porcello have been mediocre, and that’s being generous. And Eovaldi is hurt.

      And when I posted yesterday, I had a tempus fugit moment, and didn’t realize how close to the trade deadline we were, and our SPs probably have only 2-3 starts to prove they are competing.

      And, unlike a lot of RS fans, I am not going to lose my schiit if we don’t compete this year. But I also don’t want to play to an inside straight, or sit on my hands when another, true contender, wants to overpay for some of our players.

      Reply
  29. Steve9955

    6 years ago

    Henry sucks. He should go back to playing “Social Justice Warrior” and take Yawkey’s name off of something else

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      6 years ago

      ROTFLMAO!!!

      You’re either a troll with nothing to do in his life, or an embittered Yankee fan that Henry has mentally and psychologically broke, I suggest you seek help

      Reply
  30. SG

    6 years ago

    “If we play up to our capabilities we will easily make the playoffs. That’s how I see it,”
    Thank God you see it that way John Henry.
    That’s exactly how I see it too.

    Reply
  31. SG

    6 years ago

    I also suspect that John Henry generally has had it with long term FA contracts.
    Bill James is probably the biggest winner here.
    Dave Dombrowski and Alex Cora are probably the biggest losers.
    Mookie Betts should also realize he’s going to have to find another team after 2020 if in fact he isn’t traded before then. If I’m John Henry I’d be really disappointed with Mookie Betts. Just think about how valuable Tom Brady has been to the Patriots. Mookie isn’t even close to being a GOAT and probably never will be.
    So the dig John Henry is giving is to the people making the big bucks and the MVP.
    I suspect he’s looking at better drafting, player development and management in 2020.
    Diversification a lower budget and keeping hungry players striving is also what I suspect he’s seeing.
    That big contracts generally breed disincentives and a lack of performance.
    But I’m sure Tony Clark will defend his players yet again.
    Just look at how Harper and Machado didn’t even make the All Star Team.
    Who needs to throw away money?
    It’s got to be embarrassing to see Tampa ahead of Boston at 25% the payroll.
    And the Yankees ahead of Boston playing their 2nd string all year.
    If I’m John Henry I’ve had it and I’m making some serious changes now and in 2020 and beyond to the way the Red Sox do business.

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      6 years ago

      “f I’m John Henry I’ve had it and I’m making some serious changes now and in 2020 and beyond to the way the Red Sox do business.”

      We’ve been the most successful team in BB this century, by a fair margin, and have just come off of one of the greatest seasons in BB history. I doubt that Henry is questioning the business model that brought us this success.

      That doesn’t mean that anything is carved in stone. Every year is different.

      Also, in regard to the “That big contracts generally breed disincentives and a lack of performance.”, that hasn’t been that much of an issue. Our long-term contracts are Sale, Price, JDM, Vazquez, Bogaerts, Eovaldi, and Pedroia. Two are hurt, and the other 5 are doing okay+.

      It’s the shorter terms guys that are struggling: JBJ (great lately), Betts, Porcello, ERod…

      Reply
      • SG

        6 years ago

        I think what John Henry is saying is:
        The plan isn’t working in 2019.
        Throwing money at a Red Sox problem may not fix it.
        Losing money makes no sense.
        The team and he are both vulnerable when he spends and they don’t produce.
        My take is that he is pissed that Tampa and NYY are ahead of BOS.
        Considering Tampa has a payroll 25% of Boston’s.
        And that the NYY did this with numerous injuries.
        My take is that Bill James (sabermetrics) is making sense to him. And he may look to hire a new GM like Eric Neander of Tampa his new GM in 2020.
        A GM that knows developing young inexpensive talent.
        How can any owner argue with winning at 25% the price and reducing risk?
        Here’s a question?
        If Tampa and Boston switched cities.
        The Tampa Bay Rays now become the Boston Red Sox.
        And The Boston Red Sox become the Tampa Bay Rays.
        Do you think attendance changes at either ballpark?
        Do you think the Boston Red Sox fans want to see their favorite players?
        Or do you think Boston Red Sox fans prefer winning more with no names?
        Do you think Tampa fans attandance is more at Tropicanna field?
        Due to having Betts, JD, Sale, Price, etc?
        Do you think Fox TV picks up the baseball stars or the winning teams?
        Do you think people buy MLB paraphernalia of the stars or winners more?
        Which system brings in the most bottom line revenue for the owner?
        Big names or wins with no names?

        Reply
        • SG

          6 years ago

          I suspect the answer clearly is WINNING.
          Or teams would’t unload expensive big name talent at the trade deadline.
          Am I right?
          So if I am right then winning is paramount.
          And if winning is paramount then spending less to win is even more paramount.
          That’s the business model every successful businessman uses.
          And you don’t take risks if you can avoid them.
          So 2019 is a disaster for Boston.
          I suspect John Henry may be looking at 2020 and beyond.
          He may throw some small extra money into 2019 if he is within range of the playoffs.
          But he may also be thinking of unloading payroll at the deadline.
          I suspect this is John Henry’s frustration and dilemma.
          If I were the owner I would pick up the minimum I needed to make a run at it in 2019 and unload dead weight in the off season.
          Assuming I could unload it.
          LOL
          And I would definitely hire a Billy Beane or Eric Neadner type of GM as my new GM for 2020. A Bill James friendly type guy.
          .

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          6 years ago

          I agree to the extent that 2019 is not working out. And I agree that it might be foolish to throw valuable resources towards making a run to beat out 3 other teams in order to have a one-game playoff.

          Especially with only one SP pitching like a #1.

          However, it is impossible to compare the RS and TB. By virtue of losing, TB gets much higher picks, and grabs additional picks when they allow players to leave.

          They are also in a mode of semi-permanent low expectations.. They traded off Longoria, Archer, Colome, Dickerson, etc., and couldn’t care less what the fans think. The RS are always expected to compete for the WS. We’re not allowed to trade away good players each year.

          Having said that, I would adapt some of TB’s operating principles. Unless we sweep Detroit, I would trade Betts, Porcello, and Holt (assuming we can’t extend him) over the AS break. For a team of our stature, backing into the #2 WC is certainly no victory.

          Reply
  32. SG

    6 years ago

    The most I can see the Red Sox doing is getting a SP like Mike Leake.
    Having made the decision to put Eovaldi in the pen leaves a hole for a SP.
    Losing Eovaldi was probably a big factor in burning out the pen and a cause for creating a gaping hole on the pitching staff by giving him the money rather than Kimbrel.
    Unless they find a way to unload some heavy dead weight payroll in a trade.
    In other words find a sap team that has the bucks and wants dead weight big name payroll players that under perform.
    Any suggestions on whom that team may be? LOL

    Reply
  33. SG

    6 years ago

    Here’s an idea.
    Hire Eric Neander of Tampa as your new GM.
    It not only helps Boston it also weakens Tampa.
    Can you see Tampa hiring Dombrowski? LOL

    Reply
  34. tmcca

    6 years ago

    I have a feeling Red Sox get Bumgarner/Smith and give Bumgarner 3 year extension. Would make sense since Porcello a Free Agent next year. Question is who you give up? Dalbec? Houck? Groom?

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      6 years ago

      Kind of an off year for Mad Bum, and he is just about 30. As a RS fan, I am not real keen on adding, unless they show me a little more with what they have.

      Reply
  35. SG

    6 years ago

    John Henry has been the best Red Sox owner of all time.
    He is a class human being.
    He is a very successful businessman both before and since he got into baseball.
    He owns a franchise (Boston) that is obsessed with baseball and winning.
    He has good people advising him. Bill James, Tony LaRoussa, Dave Dombroski and others.
    He made a lot of sense talking to Billy Beane in Moneyball when he saw the logic of sabermetrics.
    He needs to get more involved on a daily basis with the Red Sox decision making.
    He made his money with his intelligence and he’ll expand his wealth using that judgement.
    He needs to put money into the best scouts, managers and coaches that can draft and develop raw baseball talent.
    He needs to resist the temptation to acquire expensive older players on the free agent market that are asking for the long term big buck contracts.
    Just compare Michael Chavis to Bryce Harper and or Manny Machado in 2019.
    Or even Mookie Betts and or JD Martinez.
    And you’ll see that good players can be had much more inexpensively.
    As you did with trading commodity futures, ignore the hype, study the trends and stick to your game plan.
    You simply need to be more involved.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow

    Astros To Promote Brice Matthews

    Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers

    Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help

    Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays

    Yankees Release DJ LeMahieu

    Trevor Williams To Undergo UCL Surgery

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Rangers Option Josh Jung

    Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

    Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

    Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin

    Recent

    J.D. Davis Signs With NPB’s Seibu Lions

    The Opener: 2025 Draft, Pitchers’ Duel, Mets

    Trade Deadline Outlook: New York Yankees

    Trade Deadline Outlook: Atlanta Braves

    Which Other Relievers Might The Orioles Shop?

    Lee Elia Passes Away

    Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow

    Poll: Which Teams Should Make The Biggest Push For Jarren Duran?

    MLB Finalizes Home Run Derby Field

    Astros To Promote Brice Matthews

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version