Headlines

  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Padres, Cubs Nearing Yu Darvish Trade

By Steve Adams | December 28, 2020 at 8:10pm CDT

8:32pm: Padres outfielder Ismael Mena and shortstop Yeison Santana are other names in discussion, Mayo reports.

8:20pm: Davies and “several prospects,” including 2020 second-round outfielder Owen Caissie, will be going to the Cubs, Jonathan Mayo of MLB.com reports. Shortstop Reginald Preciado will also head to Chicago, per Acee, who adds that the trade features “two other prospects.” The Cubs won’t get any of the Padres’ top five prospects, according to Nightengale.

7:10pm: Caratini will be part of the trade once it occurs, but Campusano won’t, Nightengale tweets.

6:58pm: The clubs are close to a deal and appear as if they’ll finalize it tonight, per Nightengale.

4:32pm: The trade looks to be close, Heyman tweets. Caratini would “likely” join Darvish in San Diego, though the Cubs want “some MLB experience” as part of their return.

3:04pm: The two teams are nearing agreement “on the multiple pieces” of a Darvish trade, per Kevin Acee of the San Diego Union-Tribune. The Pads “have accepted the haul they will have to send to the Cubs,” Acee writes.

2:50pm: Top catching prospect Luis Campusano is among the names that has been discussed, Nightengale reports. His inclusion in the deal would give the Cubs a replacement should they send a catcher to the Padres. Campusano would join Miguel Amaya as a potential long-term option at the position with Contreras up for free agency in two years (if he’s not traded in this or another deal first).

2:03pm: There’s “growing optimism” that the two sides will complete a deal, tweets USA Today’s Bob Nightengale, adding that an agreement could come together as soon as today.

12:28pm: The Padres are focused on more than Darvish alone, per MLB Network’s Jon Heyman and the New York Post’s Joel Sherman (Twitter link). Both suggest that the talks between the Cubs and Padres could be expanded to include one of Willson Contreras or Victor Caratini.

The Padres’ catching corps has turned over considerably over the past year, with Francisco Mejia now with in Tampa Bay, Austin Hedges in Cleveland and Luis Torrens in Seattle. The Friars have Austin Nola atop their catching depth chart, with touted prospect Luis Campusano behind him, but the latter is still lacking in MLB experience. Either Chicago catcher would bolster the group, and Contreras would likely push Nola into a super-utility role similar to the one in which he thrived with the Mariners.

11:56am: Despite last night’s agreement to acquire Blake Snell from the Rays, the Cubs are also “deep” in talks on a trade that would send Yu Darvish from Chicago to San Diego, according to Dennis Lin, Patrick Mooney and Sahadev Sharma of The Athletic (Twitter link). R.J. Anderson of CBS Sports first indicated that the Padres were still in the mix for Darvish even after landing Snell. Importantly, MLB Network’s Jon Heyman tweets that San Diego is not on Darvish’s 12-team no-trade list, so the deal can be made without requiring Darvish’s approval.

If completed, the Darvish trade could be the next step in another dizzying flurry of headline-grabbing transactions from general manager A.J. Preller. In addition to Snell and the potential Darvish deal, the Padres are also reported to be the favorites to sign KBO superstar Ha-Seong Kim. If all three moves come to fruition, this sequence would hearken back to Preller’s inaugural offseason, wherein Matt Kemp dubbed him the “Rock Star” GM — and back to this summer’s frenzied series of trade deadline acquisitions. Few front offices around the game act as boldly and decisively as the Padres when a course is set, and the Snell acquisition clearly looks to have set some dominos in motion.

It’s at least possible there’s a connection between today’s pair of Friars rumors; the Cubs surely want controllable young talent, and a player like Jake Cronenworth would certainly be of interest to them in a Darvish deal. That’s speculative on my part, to be clear, but it’s not hard to see how those pieces could fit into place. Alternatively, if the Padres were to send an outfielder with a notable salary back to Chicago to help offset Darvish’s contract (e.g. Tommy Pham, Wil Myers), Cronenworth could move into the outfield if needed.

Darvish, 34, is still owed $62MM over the next three seasons as part of the six-year, $126MM he initially signed with the Cubs prior to the 2018 season. The first year of that massive contract could scarcely have gone worse, as Darvish was limited to just 40 innings due to a series of injuries that culminated in arthroscopic elbow surgery.

At that point, few would’ve imagined Darvish resurfacing as both a front-line starter and a highly sought-after trade commodity, but that’s exactly what’s happened. Darvish finished second in National League Cy Young voting in 2020, thanks to a brilliant 2.01 ERA and 93-to-13 K/BB ratio through 76 innings. However, his renaissance extends further back than that.

Dating back to Memorial Day 2019, Darvish has made 32 starts and totaled 199 2/3 innings of 2.84 ERA/3.04 FIP ball with averages of 11.5 strikeouts and 2.4 walks per nine frames. At less than $21MM a year, this version of Darvish looks like a relative bargain, though buying his age-34, age-35 and age-36 seasons obviously still carries risk. Darvish is also a favorite of Preller — a former Rangers assistant GM who played an integral part in scouting and signing Darvish during his time with Texas.

The very notion of a rotation featuring some combination of Snell, Darvish, Dinelson Lamet, Chris Paddack, Zach Davies and MacKenzie Gore is a dream scenario for Padres fans — the type of starting staff that would give the Friars a group to go toe-to-toe with the perennial division winners up in Los Angeles. Few teams in the game could boast such a deep and talented group of starting pitchers, and while Davies is a free agent next winter, the Padres will get Mike Clevinger back from Tommy John surgery for the 2022 season. A 2022 group of Snell, Darvish, Lamet, Clevinger, Paddack and Gore has the potential to be utterly overwhelming.

For the Cubs, trading away some combination of Darvish, Contreras and Caratini would be a painful first step in at least some degree of a rebuilding effort. While the Cubs probably won’t tear the roster down to the studs, there’s also some inevitable change on the horizon. Cornerstone pieces like Kris Bryant, Anthony Rizzo and Javier Baez are all free agents next winter. Kyle Schwarber would’ve joined that group but has already been non-tendered. Contreras is only controlled through 2022.

Improbable as it would have seemed a few years back, Darvish now stands out as one of president Jed Hoyer’s most desirable trade targets to dangle for other teams, joining Contreras and Kyle Hendricks in that regard. Trading Darvish (and Contreras or Caratini) would give the Cubs an avenue to clear salary and acquire controllable talent for the team’s next core.

However this plays out, it seems likely that more moves will be on the horizon for the Padres and Cubs alike. The Cubs could either jump into free agency to add a Darvish replacement at a lower cost, or they could continue to shop veteran stars like Bryant and Hendricks. And for the Padres, Preller’s history suggests that more moves are likely to follow even if Darvish, Kim and one of Contreras/Caratini all land in San Diego. The Padres could still use some help in the bullpen, for instance, and they’ll likely send some MLB talent to Chicago in order to push the Darvish deal across the line. It’s going to be a busy week in San Diego.

Share 0 Retweet 21 Send via email0

Chicago Cubs Newsstand San Diego Padres Luis Campusano Victor Caratini Willson Contreras Yu Darvish Zach Davies

Quick Hits: Cronenworth, Realmuto, Kiermaier, G. Sanchez
Main
Royals Sign Ervin Santana To Minor League Deal
View Comments (615)
Post a Comment

615 Comments

  1. Cora the Destroya

    4 years ago

    Padres after everyone big name.

    3
    Reply
    • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

      4 years ago

      Difference between them and the Blue Jays? San Diego actually gets the guy

      17
      Reply
      • Ully

        4 years ago

        intresting

        1
        Reply
        • Prospectnvstr

          4 years ago

          What’s also interesting is how something might get agreed on “as early as today”. Really? I thought it might’ve been agreed on yesterday and they’re just keeping the general public in the dark.

          1
          Reply
      • One Bite Hotdog

        4 years ago

        That and the fact that the media are the ones responsible for the ‘teams of interest’ proclamations.

        4
        Reply
        • sstew54

          4 years ago

          Still not enough to overtake the Dodgers in 2021

          Reply
        • Orel Saxhiser

          4 years ago

          Not nearly. The Dodgers are loaded with young talent. They will be improved in 2021 even if they don’t make any big moves.

          1
          Reply
        • Orel Saxhiser

          4 years ago

          The media is better connected to these teams than you are. Btw, he lost :)_

          Reply
        • PinstripedPride

          4 years ago

          We shall see. Many teams have looked the superior on paper but got defeated in the field. If Bellinger hadn’t caught that flyball at the wall in the NLDS then that series might have shifted momentum.
          There’s no way you can’t tell me that a Padres lineup which adds a bat THEN trades for Snell and Darvish isn’t at least a contender for the pennant.
          Now the Dodgers are always going to be considered the top seed until they aren’t, but do not under any circumstances count out a young hungry team

          7
          Reply
        • Chriss

          4 years ago

          I agree that this trade clearly moves the needle for the Padres. I wonder if this will motivate the Dodgers to do more than they might have originally planned for this offseason?

          1
          Reply
        • Philliesfan4life

          4 years ago

          dodgers lost a couple key players in their bullpen. If it wasen’t for the padres losing Clevinger & Lament , Padres I think would of beat the dodgers

          Reply
        • pcwizblue

          4 years ago

          If I played the lottery and won I would have been rich. I will have to reflect on reality in this scenario.

          Reply
        • letsplaytwo

          4 years ago

          You nailed it pinstripes! I’m a huge Dodgers fan since 1960, Cubs too as an Ernie Banks fan.
          The Padres are loaded, with or without an effective Yu. Stranger things have happened in this grand old game we love!

          Reply
      • to4

        4 years ago

        Blue Jays did too last year in Ryu or not? I bet they will get Springer and either Kim or Lindor as well.

        1
        Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          4 years ago

          Hard to get players to play when they have no idea where they will host in 2021… Who still knows if Toronto is in the picture.

          Reply
        • bigdaddyt

          4 years ago

          Well not Kim considering he’s signing don’t want Springer maybe it’s the Vernon Wells contract that gives me cold feet on this one and don’t understand the hype of getting JTR when the jays are loaded with catching prospects. Anyways jays aren’t doing anything I’m afraid

          Reply
        • S_man_2014

          4 years ago

          Not Kim

          Reply
      • Cora the Destroya

        4 years ago

        Not disagreeing there

        Reply
        • bestno5

          4 years ago

          You agreed with yourself…..

          1
          Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        Because they overpay

        Reply
      • Murphy NFLD

        4 years ago

        As a jays fan, i kove it

        Reply
      • slider32

        4 years ago

        Padres just stole the winter from the Mets and Jays, nobody can top this one!

        Reply
        • frankiegxiii

          4 years ago

          Just like the Padres won the 2015 offseason and the 2020 trade deadline…

          2
          Reply
        • andremets

          4 years ago

          Padres are winning the trade market by dealing some of their deep farm system’a prospects. The Mets are adding talent via free agent signings. That’s a big difference.

          Reply
      • Perksy

        4 years ago

        Poor Chorono

        Reply
      • jeffmaz

        4 years ago

        Padres fans suffered for decades. We know how that feels.

        Reply
      • Joeypower

        4 years ago

        Can’t agree more

        Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Who is the opening day SP in 2021? 2022? So many possibilities and it still could be Bauer.

        Reply
    • Francys01

      4 years ago

      Preller is going to make the Padres farm system weak by trading a lot of prospects. They traded for Clevinger, Snell and now they want to acquire Darvish. I understand they want to win but they need to think about the future of the franchise. By the way, I’m not a Padres fan at all.

      3
      Reply
      • Wadz

        4 years ago

        Everyone theyve traded for is good and controllable……

        Seems like Preller is trying to maximize on a 3 year window..

        7
        Reply
        • rondon

          4 years ago

          Everyone believes their prospects are precious and too valuable to move but they are in fact a commodity that when used effectively, can take a solid team like San Diego and put them at the next level.

          4
          Reply
        • CalcetinesBlancos

          4 years ago

          Trades are a good way to get really good players in the middle of a contract, so you don’t have to commit to a something like that Machado deal.

          2
          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          Problem is they’re rarely used effectively and usually chucked away short sightedly

          Reply
        • 5toolMVP

          4 years ago

          @wads
          Exactly! 3 year window to compete for titles and they can still draft and make future trades to rebuild the farm by 2023-25.

          1
          Reply
        • desertball

          4 years ago

          Excellent post

          Reply
        • Orel Saxhiser

          4 years ago

          The Dodgers have more talent and a wider window.

          Reply
        • WiffleBall

          4 years ago

          Except that the Machado signing was necessary as a message to future trade targets and other free agents, to say “we are willing to do what it takes to win.” It was to attract more talent to a team that hadn’t contended for over a decade. It gave them credibility, on top of the game’s best prospect pool and young talent already on the major league roster.

          Very much like Jason Werth’s signing gave the Nationals instant respectability. Those kinds of signings are an investment, and the Padres were at the time one of the few teams where the the money was worth more than what the player actually delivers.

          I could see the White Sox pursuing someone like that this or next offseason.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          The Machado signing didn’t send any message. No free agent is going to sign with the Padres when they otherwise wouldn’t have just because they signed Machado. All the Machado signing was was Preller signing the best free agent available at a position of need.

          Reply
        • 802Ghost

          4 years ago

          As a Braves fan, this pains me to agree with. Atlanta should have moved several of their prospects over the years.

          Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          I agree, it seems somewhat silly but my Cubs did the same by signing Jon Lester. They announced their intention to compete and proved it to the fans and players alike.
          Signing Machado was a great move for the Pads, except as an outsider he seems to have questionable makeup, which is not the type of guy you want to mentor your young players. Hopefully Manny is taking that role more seriously and embracing being the veteran leader.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Manny’s makeup is fine. We’ll see if he ends up being worth his contract in the later years but his makeup is fine.

          Reply
      • hittingnull

        4 years ago

        Well, they traded their future for a three year window. It’s a gamble, but many will do it with what they got back.

        Reply
        • DT.J.B.

          4 years ago

          Not sure why I keep seeing the phrase “three year window” as it relates to the Padres. In three years a lot can change to remain competitive. Also I don’t mind a team going out and trading prospects. Every team has recent prospects who didn’t pan out. Prospect never equals results, in baseball, sales or business.

          Reply
      • slider32

        4 years ago

        Yes, and they have Gore coming soon!!!

        Reply
      • PinstripedPride

        4 years ago

        None of the players Preller is acquiring are rentals, same as last year– minus Jurickson Profar and Trevor Rosenthal. He’s playing the long game and being pretty smart about it.

        3
        Reply
      • letsplaytwo

        4 years ago

        Yep, Dodgers fan here hoping Preller shortens “the window” by trading the farm to win in the next three years or so.

        Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 years ago

        I love prospects. That is how you build team. Can’t be narrow minded or just look at right now. Both big ticket items had 3 seasons of control. Padres look to be one of the best teams for those 3 years. They traded one top prospect. They could possibly replace most of the prospects they traded by trading away these guys, or lesser pitchers, or with comp picks. Let’s see what they give up for yu.

        Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Their farm system never stops

        Reply
  2. NYYstateofmind

    4 years ago

    Wowzer!!

    Reply
  3. baseballpun

    4 years ago

    So now we’re going to get to the point where if the Friars don’t win the World Series in the next 3 years it’s going to be a catastrophe.

    Reply
    • Cora the Destroya

      4 years ago

      Not necessarily. Making a good run is still better than doing nothing at all. Their window is now.

      6
      Reply
      • Avory

        4 years ago

        The worst thing any organization can do is operate as if there are “windows” they need to react to…only bad organizations do that. It’s hubris to think we know when windows are ‘open”, “shut”, or “closing.” The idea that you can predict injuries, what your competition is going to do, or pandemics is folly. Just make good baseball decisions every day and let the chips fall where they may.

        I don’t know about you, but the Rays know what they are doing. The Padres have never given that impression, ever.

        1
        Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          4 years ago

          I agree with you mostly but I disagree on your consensus of the Padres. I think they are doing a great job being competitive and taking on the Dodgers. You can’t wait 2 to 3 years when the Dodgers will be just as good then. They have been doing great in both the FA market and on the development end. Yes, they just barely won a World Series, but the Dodgers will be dominant for years to come. When you have a talented team like the Padres, build it up. Giants got 3 World Series championships before their roster got decimated.

          2
          Reply
        • A Seal

          4 years ago

          Padres are just getting every player in sight. My Dodgers did that 2012-15 and it got us division titles and nothing else. The Dodgers can get under the radar players and wait for the best superstar to show up. They didn’t go in on Bryce Harper. They waited for Mookie. Some fans didn’t like it. But it turned out great in the end. Sooner or later things will get expensive and Padres implode.

          Reply
        • mlbfan9764

          4 years ago

          Avory, I agree. The Rays did take former Padres players and took them to the World Series last year, albeit, just that year. That’s already motivating for those players.

          As for the Padres, it has always been a pull the trigger and deal with the consequences later. Last they did that and made it all the way to the Series, was when they had Kevin Brown (pulling trigger on signings and trades)?

          Reply
        • Magnum

          4 years ago

          Here we go with the d fans.

          Reply
        • padreforlife

          4 years ago

          Bingo

          Reply
        • Prospectnvstr

          4 years ago

          pwndroia: Very well stated.

          Reply
        • The Natural

          4 years ago

          Disagree. Hosmer and Machado are peaking now. Tatis and Grisham are breaking out. You make the move for pitching right now.

          1
          Reply
        • Whifff

          4 years ago

          Couldn’t disagree with Avory more. You can absolutely point to teams not in a window and therefore should be collecting young talent and purging unneeded veterans that are ruining their draft position.

          1
          Reply
        • Orel Saxhiser

          4 years ago

          From 2017-19, the Dodgers averaged 100-plus wins per season and went to the World Series twice. They won the WS in 2020 while playing better than .700 ball and are loaded with young talent that has already experienced MLB success. They figure to be a better team in 2021` whether they make any big moves or not. I like the patience and stability. In my 54 years of being a Dodgers fan, this is my favorite era ever and it is really just getting started. Friedman > Preller. Life is good.

          Reply
        • Magnum

          4 years ago

          Of course

          Reply
        • Rsox

          4 years ago

          The groundwork for that World Series was laid over the previous 5 seasons. Acquiring Trevor Hoffman, Andy Ashby, the blockbuster with the Astros, Wally Joyner, Greg Vaughn, Sterling Hitchcock. Kevin Brown was the final piece in a years long process. All of those trades cost the Padres nothing of consequence

          1
          Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          4 years ago

          @DodgersWorldChamps2020

          The more division titles you win, the better your chances. Just because the Dodgers won only on one year, that doesn’t mean the formula for winning is wrong. Look at the A’s. They win the division plenty of times and can’t close the gap. Dodgers have a very different approach. Padres are going after good players to win and they still have young talent too. I wouldn’t be surprised if they make the Dodgers run for their money. By the way, the Dodgers were the only competitive NL team last year (IMO) besides the Padres. They just barely beat the Braves who are vastly overrated in my book.

          Reply
    • to4

      4 years ago

      Indeed! If they acquire Yu, their 2021 rotation is as follows:

      1.Darvish
      2.Snell
      3.Paddack
      4.Lamet
      5.Davies
      6.McKenzie Gore

      As for 2022 if Darvish and Clevinger are still around and performing! Watch out!

      1.Clevinger
      2.Snell
      3.Darvish
      4.Lamet
      5.Paddack
      6.Davies
      7.McKenzie Gore

      Ouchhhh! Dodgers need to keep a close eye now and don’t trade away any of Urias, May, and Gonzo. Furthermore, they need to retain Kershaw beyond this season as well in order to compete with that!

      3
      Reply
      • Herc33

        4 years ago

        Davies is a FA after 2021, but you could just insert Weathers or Morejon into the back of the rotation there and it would probably be just as good.

        Reply
        • DarkSide830

          4 years ago

          Morejon’s probably the headliner here

          Reply
      • libertyfighter

        4 years ago

        I think it’s entirely possible that Davies goes to the Cubs in this deal and AJ signs Sugano to replace him. 2021 rotation: 1. Lamet 2. Darvish 3. Snell 4. Sugano 5. Paddack (I think he improves significantly in 2021). Padres have Gore and Morejon stashed at AAA in case of injury.

        I think that Myers, Davies and Campusano to the Cubs. Darvish and Contreras to the Padres.

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          They wouldn’t be taking Myers back if they are trading both Darvish and Contreras.

          5
          Reply
        • rondon

          4 years ago

          That would depend on the prospect return. Contreras, a top 5, 2 time all star with 2 years of very affordable control really changes the deal.

          Reply
        • A Seal

          4 years ago

          Paddock is trash and Dodgers always blow him up.

          1
          Reply
        • Led Hoyer

          4 years ago

          Cubs are not trading Darvish and Contreras for Davies, a contract dump and a catching prospect. It would make absolutely no sense. Young controllable arms is what they need

          1
          Reply
        • mlbfan9764

          4 years ago

          All he needs to do then is figure out how to beat the Dodgers. That’s like comparing all the criticism Joc Pederson receives because he’s not a regular season hitter, but comes up clutch in the playoffs.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @DodgersWorldChamps2020 who is Paddock?

          1
          Reply
        • 1984wasntamanual

          4 years ago

          Why would the cubs make that trade?

          Reply
        • User 355748524

          4 years ago

          @DodgersWorldChamps2020

          I would warn you that your bias is showing, but your username is doing that just fine.

          1
          Reply
        • The Natural

          4 years ago

          Myers’ contract is horrible. They’d never move Yu and then turn around and take on the same amount with the unpredictable Myers.

          1
          Reply
        • Paul Popovich's Bat

          4 years ago

          I dont see them taking all of Myers money unless they add Kimbrel and his money

          Darvish, Kimbrel, Caratini for Myers, Cronenworth, Morejon, Campusano, and an A ball lottery ticket pitcher. I still think the Padres might have to send someone else in that scenario.

          Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          4 years ago

          You really have everything good to say about the Dodgers.

          Reply
      • Marty McRae

        4 years ago

        Gore is going to be absolutely disgusting as a RP this year.

        0.00 ERA for 50+ IP is on the table.

        Reply
        • earmbrister

          4 years ago

          Why be conservative with a 0.00 ERA? Surely he (and you) can post a negative ERA …

          Reply
      • padreforlife

        4 years ago

        Davies is batting practice in postseason gd stinks in postseason. Paddack wasn’t even in rotation end of year and got ambushed his only postseason appearance so counting on him like he’s proven is laughable.

        Reply
      • Orel Saxhiser

        4 years ago

        Buehler, Kershaw, Urias. May, Gonsolin is better than that. The Padres need to sweat out the Dodgers perhaps landing Castillo, who is better than either Snell or Darvish (or any other Padres starter).

        Reply
    • CheeseHeadPadre

      4 years ago

      Still an awful lot left in the farm, too. This isn’t the farm system of the first all-in that had a few marquee names and then a whole bunch of nothing. This farm is one of the deepest in baseball with a lot of young talent still marinating from their J2 extravaganza before the cap was instituted.
      They could trade for Darvish and Snell and still have a top 5-7 farm, with one heck of an MLB roster with plenty of control.

      1
      Reply
      • Tatsumaki

        4 years ago

        For about 3/4 years before everyone gets expensive. I commend padres for recognizing that they can’t develop talent and are instead going to use that talent as capital to get proven players.

        2
        Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 years ago

          Sounds like what Dombrowski is always chastised for, even though it mostly works out.

          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 years ago

          I love DD. Just don’t give him the checkbook. No idea if it was him or ownership. But I will never be ok with giving 30 year olds hundreds of millions.

          Reply
        • ullnvrknw

          4 years ago

          Contradict yourself much? You started off by saying everyone will notice they can’t develop talent . Why would they trade for it then?

          Reply
  4. seamaholic 2

    4 years ago

    Yikes. Padres selling it all for a 2-3 year run. I guess that makes a certain amount of sense. But it’s the same time frame as the peak of this Dodgers team. Gonna be a battle royale. Good time for the Dbacks and Rockies to sell and wait for their chance.

    5
    Reply
    • miggy4prez

      4 years ago

      Good, personally I’m tired of the Dodgers. About time someone stepped up in the NL

      12
      Reply
      • Donovan Voigt

        4 years ago

        hopefully both these teams make nothing happen for the next few years

        Reply
        • DarkSide830

          4 years ago

          the rest of the NL hopes they beat each other into submission for the next few years

          Reply
      • mlbfan9764

        4 years ago

        I think everyone is tired of them because they’ve been in the big time for the last 4 years and only have 1 ship to cheer (albeit Astros’ would have not cheated, 2).

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          If the Astros don’t cheat they don’t get past the Yankees in the ALCS. It’s not clear that the Dodgers beat the Yankees.

          Reply
        • 1984wasntamanual

          4 years ago

          Not a dodgers fan, but I’m not tired of them. They’re an interesting team imo.

          1
          Reply
        • Angels & NL West

          4 years ago

          RemovePitcherWins, in the ALCS you reference, the Yankees scored a total of 3 runs and had 19 hits in their 4 losses to the Astros. In fairness, it’s tough to win a 7 game series when you score 1 run in 3 games and get shutout in Game 7.

          I’m not an Astros fan, but their pitching handled the Yankees pretty well in those 4 games.

          1
          Reply
      • UnknownPoster

        4 years ago

        “ Good, personally I’m tired of the Dodgers”

        Reminder that the dodgers were BANKRUPT less than a decade ago. All you morons act like they’ve been this spending juggernaut for decades. It’s just not true

        Reply
        • smuzqwpdmx

          4 years ago

          The Dodgers bottomed out at the 12th highest payroll in MLB when they were bankrupt (and higher than that most years). It’s not as if they had a fire sale.

          1
          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Oh no, they just spent as pseudo-wild card contenders, cutting payroll while claiming a youth movement was the reason why. In reality, Jaimie McCourt was buying mansions and the dodgers failed to make payroll mid season

          Do you know how bad of a business model you have to have to fail to make payroll, as a freak MLB team in LA? That team was run into the ground and if you can’t comprehend that, there’s nothing more to say

          Reply
      • cubs2016champs

        4 years ago

        the cubs did in 2016

        Reply
    • Tatsumaki

      4 years ago

      This is the type of move that screams make or break for padres. Preller guts farm and they repeat 2014 he will lose his job easily. All just to compete with dodgers for a few years, seems short sided

      1
      Reply
      • libertyfighter

        4 years ago

        Preller is not gutting anything. The Cubs want to move Darvish’s $60 million. To do this the Padres will move Myers $40 million. I think Campy, Davies also go to the Cubs, if Contreras is included. This allows AJ to still sign Sugano, Rosenthal, as well as a short term power hitting right fielder to replace Myers. Crowenworth because a super utility guy who can play every position except Catcher and Center field. Cronenworth still gets 300+ at bats and can play every day if a majority injury occurs.

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Seems like the Cubs are punting on 2021. Don’t see them having any interest in the rental Zach Davies.

          Reply
        • bighiggy

          4 years ago

          Not sure the cubs would take back myers 40 mil. So the cubs would get myers, 20 mil saved(which isnt a huge savings) davies(a free agent next year) and campy for a cy young caliber pitcher, and a top 5 catcher. That would make zero sense lol. You are living in a dream world where Camp and another awesome prospect arent included for Contreras and darvish

          6
          Reply
        • MarkoRock68

          4 years ago

          Darvish has surplus value with his contract, Myers has negative value, if he is included the cost of acquisition goes up. If Contreras is included think Myers/Cronenworth/Campu/Weathers

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhh don’t talk about Wil Myers that way or @Padres2019ha will drag you off to the guillotine.

          1
          Reply
        • 1984wasntamanual

          4 years ago

          So they want to get rid of Darvish’s $60, but to do that they’re going to take back 40m in Myers and ~7(?) in Davies? Yeah, think about the logic there.

          Reply
        • Padres2019ha

          4 years ago

          You have no shame Ryan. I’ll give you that

          Reply
        • padreforlife

          4 years ago

          Move Wil Myers what sucker team doing that? None

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Neither do you, apparently.

          Dancing around your silly Myers-for-Syndergaard proposal in 5… 4… 3… 2…

          Reply
        • Padres2019ha

          4 years ago

          Haha why are you obsessed with me? You remember silly trade proposals from 3 years ago, after Myers was an all star and left out other prospects I included…You clown have changed your name 4 times at least due to being banned. You also were called out by Steve Adam’s that you were in fact who you were saying g ylu were not. It was rather embarrassing for you. Yet, here.you.are.

          2
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Obsessed with you? You’re the one who is troll stalking me all over this thread. You say you prefer to talk baseball. It is abundantly clear from your comments on here that that is a lie and a half.

          By the way, Myers was an All Star 4 years ago and it was 2 years ago when he had reverted back to being a scrub that you were pushing Myers for Syndergaard. Everyone saw it, you’re just gonna have to live with that.

          Finally, if Manny Machado doesn’t prove to you that the Padres don’t have to trade for a player first and “gain the inside track” to sign him later on, idk what will.

          Reply
        • Paul Popovich's Bat

          4 years ago

          only way the Padres don’t kick in some of Myers 2021 salary directly is if they take Kimbrel’s contract.

          Reply
        • Emerson83

          4 years ago

          More than just 2021..

          Reply
        • Padres2019ha

          4 years ago

          You didn’t deny anything I said. Cool. Good job Ry Ry. We didn’t trade for a dude who never did much and had TJ…you win!

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          And you didn’t deny anything I said. Or address any of your other ill-fated predictions.

          Syndergaard for Myers would have hugely favored the Padres. Even with Syndergaard having TJ and probably being overrated. Which is exactly why the Mets didn’t do it.

          Reply
    • pustule bosey

      4 years ago

      not really the peak, if the lose turner, kike, seager and follow that up with some other guys in the next couple of years they have some major shoes to fill, not saying they can’t fill them but it may or may not work out

      Reply
    • A Seal

      4 years ago

      Personally, I’m not worried about a 34 year old expensive pitcher who may not do good at all. But the Padres got Blake Snell for one reason: we can’t hit lefties. We need to go all in on DJLM and JT now.

      Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      They will be waiting awhile. I see the dodgers and padres sticking around for more than 2-3 years. Giants will be coming. Better hope for the expanded playoffs where anybody decent can make it.

      Reply
  5. T_Rexx2

    4 years ago

    Stop leave some pitching for the rest of us

    1
    Reply
  6. Rangers29

    4 years ago

    WTF PADRES! THIS AIN’T FAIR! THE DODGERS WILL NO LONGER BE THE BEST TEAM IN THE WEST!!! MARK MY WORDS!!!

    Btw, Ducky, if you see this, I posted on the other thread.

    5
    Reply
    • John Kappel

      4 years ago

      Quit Yelling.

      10
      Reply
      • Rangers29

        4 years ago

        Why do you care?

        3
        Reply
        • 5toolMVP

          4 years ago

          It hurts his eye drums?? Or maybe he read it aloud in public SCREAMING like a crazy person and got some odd stares??

          Reply
        • Rangers29

          4 years ago

          Was he telling himself to quit screaming? lmao

          Reply
        • 5toolMVP

          4 years ago

          lol it’s possible

          Reply
  7. driftcat28 2

    4 years ago

    Sheesh what a rotation that would be. Wonder who would move to Chicago. Darvish, Snell, Paddack, Lamet, Gore. Wow

    Reply
    • lowtalker1

      4 years ago

      Paddack to Chicago? He is trash… two pitch pitcher with a 3rd which is a poor curve

      1
      Reply
      • Brixton

        4 years ago

        So why would the Cubs want a pitcher that you think is so bad?

        Reply
        • rememberthecoop

          4 years ago

          Because Jed is under orders to move money and so he has to get the best deal he can with a team not on his no-trade list. Plus, last I looked, lowtalker isn’t a scout.

          1
          Reply
        • lowtalker1

          4 years ago

          All you cub fans do stupid trade offers

          Reply
        • sgtschultz

          4 years ago

          This 100%. The Ricketts had $100 million for the election and nothing for payroll. Nothing but salary dump by horrible owners.

          Reply
      • miggy4prez

        4 years ago

        “He is trash” LOL I love the internet

        1
        Reply
        • lowtalker1

          4 years ago

          Then you can have him

          Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        It would take way more than Paddock. He wouldn’t be included. Minimum 3 players for Darvish and 2 more prospects if they also want Contreas/ Caratini

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Wbo’s Paddock?

          1
          Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          {rolls eyes}

          Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          Meant for RemovePitcher

          1
          Reply
        • libertyfighter

          4 years ago

          Not a chance. Darvish is still owed $62 million and the Cubs are dumping salary.

          Reply
        • bighiggy

          4 years ago

          That’s 62mil for a cy young runner up. He still has a ton of value. Contreras as well. Campusano and a good not great 1 year rental pitcher and an expensive outfielder wont get you those two. I’m not even a cub fan and that makes no sense

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @Robert care to elaborate?

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Oh man, I remember the first time I heard that one when I was 4! Didn’t hurt then, doesn’t hurt now 🙂

          Try harder.

          Reply
        • Magnum

          4 years ago

          Ha

          Reply
        • ERLking

          4 years ago

          You’ve been called a Red Rooster since you were four? Damn, you had tough parents!

          2
          Reply
        • padreforlife

          4 years ago

          West Coast Ryan

          1
          Reply
      • padreforlife

        4 years ago

        Mullet boy

        1
        Reply
  8. Brixton

    4 years ago

    Clev/Davies, Paddack, Snell, Gore, Lament, Morejon, Weathers, Darvish, etc etc.

    Depth is the key to beating the dodgers i guess

    Reply
    • padam

      4 years ago

      Yeah, I’m guessing one or two of those pitchers are gone.

      1
      Reply
      • Prospectnvstr

        4 years ago

        padam: I think Ryan Weathers and either morejon or Cronenworth and a lottery ticket gets the deal done.

        Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      are you lamenting?

      Reply
      • Ma4170

        4 years ago

        Maybe he’s Lameting

        2
        Reply
      • Robert-5

        4 years ago

        I hope so, haha. That kid has a he// of an arm… Knowing Cubs FO they’re likely targeting a position player w some PTBNL pitching thrown on top.
        One arm, everyone knows the rules, no pitchers that throw over 93mph.

        Reply
  9. paddyo furnichuh

    4 years ago

    Bravo to the Padres aggressive off-season so far. As a Dodger fan, not having serious divisional competition for the last few years has made the regular season less compelling.

    Reply
    • 8ManLineupNoPitcherNoDH

      4 years ago

      This is what happens why you try to buy a title each year

      Reply
      • John Kappel

        4 years ago

        That’s better than buying MadBum.

        1
        Reply
      • Afk711

        4 years ago

        “Buying a title” is still a narrative? yikes

        1
        Reply
      • RunDMC

        4 years ago

        C’mon man. Don’t let a Braves fan tell you they had the most homegrown players of anyone in MLB that made the playoffs in 2020.
        Every team would buy Betts if they were afforded the luxury in prospects/budget to do so.

        1
        Reply
      • bestno5

        4 years ago

        Man, the last title I bought was Doctor after paying for a PHD

        Reply
  10. DarkSide830

    4 years ago

    both? wow.

    Reply
  11. AtomsAnts

    4 years ago

    Every few years, the Pads win the off-season. Then they fail and go back to being the Pads. Wash, rinse and repeat.

    3
    Reply
    • Wadz

      4 years ago

      The difference is they actually have a good team this time….

      4
      Reply
      • Tatsumaki

        4 years ago

        @wadz that’s what they said last time, padres window is 2-3 years if they trade more depth for short term gain. Cronenworth is a great piece if your Cubs.

        Reply
        • Wadz

          4 years ago

          Idc what they said.. the last time the trades made them middle of the pack.

          This time they were already a top 3 NL team before Snell.

          1
          Reply
        • padreforlife

          4 years ago

          Not going to make a difference if Machado Myers, and Hosmer don’t hit in postseason which they don’t

          Reply
    • padam

      4 years ago

      True. Just waiting for the Justin Upton announcement.

      Reply
      • John Kappel

        4 years ago

        Darvish and Kimbrel…. lol

        Reply
        • lambeau gang

          4 years ago

          Watch the Padres reacquire Kimbrel in the Darvish package lol.

          Reply
  12. 5toolMVP

    4 years ago

    Pay attention Arte!! This is how you build up a pitching staff to be a playoff & World Series contender!!!

    2
    Reply
    • johnrealtime

      4 years ago

      Step 1 : get the best farm system in baseball

      3
      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 years ago

        More like step 1 stop give 30 year olds mega contracts.

        Reply
    • paddyo furnichuh

      4 years ago

      5-tool…SD first built up quite a bit of farm depth to get more aggressive in the trade market.

      The CAA prospect depth has not developed to the same degree.

      2
      Reply
      • paddyo furnichuh

        4 years ago

        *LAA*

        Reply
    • Vizionaire

      4 years ago

      snell, yes. but not with a 34 year old with 3 years left on the contract.

      1
      Reply
      • Robert-5

        4 years ago

        Darvish has less mileage than you might think. And a newer ligament in his pitching elbow.

        Reply
        • Vizionaire

          4 years ago

          still no thank you for me.

          Reply
        • marinersblue96

          4 years ago

          No pitcher from the Nippon league has less milage than you think.

          1
          Reply
    • 5toolMVP

      4 years ago

      It doesn’t need to be two trades and you don’t need the BEST farm system to acquire one ace. Sure it helps, but we will see other teams with lesser farm systems make deals too.

      The Angels have player assets in the farm system to acquire one of (Snell, Darvish, Carrasco, Marquez, Gray, etc.) via trade and one free agent (Bauer, Sugano, Odorizzi, Paxton, etc)

      Reply
    • Tatsumaki

      4 years ago

      @5toolmvp you missed the most important part develop a great farm.

      Reply
      • 5toolMVP

        4 years ago

        @Jmac. No I didn’t. The Angels have a few prospects in the top 100 to make ONE trade for a starter. There is more than one way to improve the starting rotation to contend for the playoffs and World Series.

        And again my point was the Angels lack of aggressive moves to improve the rotation, not so much about trading 4-7? or so prospects to acquire two starters.

        Reply
    • 5toolMVP

      4 years ago

      @johnrealtime @paddy

      My OP is more about Arte and the Angels not being aggressive and taking action to build that starting rotation, not necessarily using the same blueprint as the Padres. I want to see them make aggressive moves to be a playoff and World Series contender.

      Reply
  13. WobblyGreg

    4 years ago

    Wowowow

    Reply
  14. 8ManLineupNoPitcherNoDH

    4 years ago

    Great, glad to see that they’re making every effort to take down the dodgers

    1
    Reply
    • padresfan619 2

      4 years ago

      this new ownership approach is the best thing to happen to San Diego sports. looking forward to watching a competitive team

      Reply
      • VinScullysSon

        4 years ago

        I know I’m supposed to hate the Padres but honestly I love what they’re doing and am excited to watch our teams battle it out.

        Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 years ago

        No nfl nba nhl it’s the only thing happening with san diego sports.

        Reply
  15. jawinks

    4 years ago

    If we can get a prospect like Gore in the deal it will be totally worth it. Cubs aren’t ready to compete right now and opening money to extend our infield would be huge. Thanks for the good years Darvish, but it’s time for us to do a soft reboot and get back to a WS

    1
    Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      It won’t be Gore. My guess is Morejon, Weathers and a lottery pick or two.

      5
      Reply
      • I Beg To Differ

        4 years ago

        Won’t be Morejon and Weathers.

        Issue Padres faced last year was lack of starting pitching.

        Acquiring Snell and Darvish while shipping out Patino and Morejon and Weathers just depletes their pitching depth even more.

        Campusano is probably the headliner given his recent legal troubles.

        Campusano, Paddack, and Caissie are my guess with cubs chipping in cash to bring Darvishs price down.

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          You’re all wrong. It won’t be any of those guys. Darvish with his age, contract and injury history isn’t worth that.

          3
          Reply
        • I Beg To Differ

          4 years ago

          Lance Lynn’s 1 year 8 mill deal at 34 cost a top 100 prospect in Dane Dunning (#98)

          If the cubs knock Darvishs contract down to 3 years 24 mill Campusano, Paddack. and Caissie is reasonable.

          Campusano recently got busted for Marijuana, felony possession. Not that bug if a deal morality wise but could see a suspension….it definitely impacts his stock currently.

          Reply
        • gbs42

          4 years ago

          Darvish has been great since July of 2019, and he has a reasonable contract. Yes, he’s older and has some injury concerns, but he’s a valuable commodity.

          2
          Reply
        • jawinks

          4 years ago

          Darvish also was a serious Cy Young contender and adds proven talent to a Padres rotation with many question marks. Players with less of a guaranteed contract have gone for more, so it would be hard for the Cubs to part ways without a serious return in the pitching department. If rotation is a big need for them, they need a deal to fill that.

          1
          Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          Campusano is an interesting target for the Cubs, if they are going all in on a rebuild. But he seems a lot like a younger Contreras so Im not sure that he’s an ideal target when we already have Caratini and Amaya waiting behind Willson.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          I don’t think anyone is trading for Campusano until his legal issues get cleared up.

          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          Dont know who morejon is but he’d have to be included. Paddock is awful. And if included he’d be fired immediately.. gotta be better than Campusano too.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Who. Is. PADDOCK!?

          1
          Reply
        • gbs42

          4 years ago

          Chris Paddack. He’s Nolen Arranado’s cousin.

          1
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          LOL!

          If you don’t know who Paddack is, you should put more time into studying baseball, and less time into posting.

          I’m not a Padre fan, but I assumed that anyone that follows baseball knows who Paddack is.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @JoeBrady We are talking about Paddock, not Paddack. I obviously know who Christopher Joseph Paddack is.

          2
          Reply
        • Padres2019ha

          4 years ago

          Good joke, Ryan

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Have the Padres traded Wil Myers for Noah Syndergaard yet? Have the Mets and Indians made a lateral move by swapping Noah Syndergaard and Corey Kluber yet? Have the Padres traded for JT Realmuto and flipped him for better prospects at the deadline yet?

          I can keep going all day buddy.

          Reply
        • lolzmets

          4 years ago

          It’s ridiculous to act like just because wins aren’t entirely within a pitcher’s control that they should be removed from the record books. Enough with the drooling Jonah Hill idolatry.

          Reply
        • 5toolMVP

          4 years ago

          @ I beg to differ

          Cubs aren’t knocking down Darvish’s contract from 3/60 to 3/24. No way in hell that happens.

          2
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Wins are a team stat, not an individual stat.

          1
          Reply
        • differentbears

          4 years ago

          Paddock: Missing in Action

          Starring Chick Norris

          Reply
        • A'sfaninLondonUK

          4 years ago

          Sorry @ I beg to differ – but why would Campusano get a suspension? Marijuana is not on the banned list any more, and whilst I appreciate it’ll harm his stock, I don’t see what it’s got to do with the league…

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          League can punish you for any legal issues. Any. Even if you end up being found not guilt in the courts

          Like, idk, a felony arrest. Why does anyone think he could headline a package for a TOR? Eesh

          1
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 years ago

          You do what you want, but I will still use Wins in my evaluation of starters. It indicates the ability to pitch effectively for more than 5 innings, and be better than your counterpart. A regular 15 game winner is worth more than a 3.00 fip.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          We are talking about Paddock, not Paddack.
          ———————————————————
          I have no idea why you keep referring to Paddock. He pitched in 1912. The player everyone is talking about is Paddack, from the Padres.

          If it’s a typo, no big deal. Posters make them all the time. Just add ‘Paddack’ to your dictionary, and you are set.

          Reply
        • padreforlife

          4 years ago

          Yea he’s overrated oveyhped pitcher who gives up a run an average inning against Dodgers for career

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          but why would Campusano get a suspension?
          ——————————————
          They can probably punish you for any reason, without the PA saying much.

          But a term in the federal pen might serve the same purpose.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @stymeedone LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boy am I glad you’re not a GM LOL! ROFLOL! ROTFLMAO!

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @JoeBrady wrek305 is the one that brought Paddock up. Not me.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          The issue is, you are acting like you are a savant for knowing how to spell Paddack’s name. 75% of the posters know how to spell his name. The other 25% know the player to which they are referring, whether it is spelled Paddack, Paddock, Poddack, Poddock or any other variation.

          Just assume that everyone is talking about the same player. Your ability to spell is name is not a unique skill set,

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @JoeBrady I am not acting like anything. I simply want to know why wrek305 is bringing up some guy who hasn’t pitched in 108 years and never for the Padres or Cubs.

          Reply
        • User 355748524

          4 years ago

          Martha?

          Reply
        • sdhitman19

          4 years ago

          Possession of Marijuana is not getting you the pen. Maybe a fine in this case.

          Reply
    • bot

      4 years ago

      Best lower the bar quite a bit there friend. Unless Cubs pay a substantial part of Yu’s salary- it’ll head line a guy around 10. Cubs may squeeze Preciado as a headliner- prob best they’ll do….

      1
      Reply
    • gbs42

      4 years ago

      “Cubs aren’t ready to compete right now?” They just won their division last year, the rest of the division is doing nothing or getting actively worse, and anything can happen in the playoffs. They’re being cheap when they have a solid opportunity to take a shot at the postseason.

      1
      Reply
      • jawinks

        4 years ago

        The Cubs can get to the playoffs but have no hope against tougher teams like the Dodgers and Braves. The offense isn’t doing much, a faltering rotation just got weaker and we haven’t added anything to the bullpen this offseason. Losing to the Marlins shows just how much is left to be desired. They are not a playoff caliber team and only look good in a division that threw in the towel

        Reply
      • Whifff

        4 years ago

        gbs, the Cubs haven’t won a single postseason GAME in three years. They aren’t anywhere near World Series contenders. If you need someone to get swept at home by the Marlins in October and not average more than one run scored a game, then ya they can be that team.

        Reply
      • 1984wasntamanual

        4 years ago

        They won their division….then promptly got swept by the fkin marlins. I’m totally ok with them blowing it up, better late than never.

        Reply
    • Sideline Redwine

      4 years ago

      Not getting Gore for Darvish. I don’t know if Gore is an option for any credible trade idea. After the Rays fleeced them last night, they better hold on to some of their pitching prospects!

      Reply
  16. chitown311

    4 years ago

    Cubs blowing it up?

    1
    Reply
    • rememberthecoop

      4 years ago

      Yes you know they are Six fan.

      Reply
      • rememberthecoop

        4 years ago

        Sox fan. Unless you’re also a fan of the number six.

        4
        Reply
  17. everlastingdave

    4 years ago

    It is now so on that things have become very much like Donkey Kong.

    Reply
  18. R.D.

    4 years ago

    Honestly, if I was a modern gm I would develop my own bullpen and hitters and use my extra prospects to trade for an amazing rotation. You just can’t predict starting pitchers for quality and durability so might as well go find established pitchers.

    Snell/Lamet/Darvish/Paddack/Davies though with Clevinger on the mend? Thats the best rotation in baseball.

    2
    Reply
    • padresfan619 2

      4 years ago

      For sure that’s the best in baseball with plenty of depth

      Reply
  19. Rangers29

    4 years ago

    So Preller was part of the Rangers FO to sign Darvish in 2012, and now he is the GM of the Padres trading for him. I love how linear that is.

    Reply
  20. towinagain

    4 years ago

    Return of “The Rockstar” wow!!! Go Preller!!!

    Reply
  21. Geno55

    4 years ago

    Only if Arte Was that smart Arte likes to play GM handpick position players Over pitching
    I’m an Angels fan but Arte makes me scratch my head

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      Unless Arte is responsible for the draft, there is nothing he can do. The Padres farm is about the deepest I’ve ever seen.

      Reply
      • bkbk

        4 years ago

        It also helped that the padres were the worst team in baseball a few times. And that Tatis became what he did.

        1
        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          They had some bad records, but the best they did was #3, #6, and maybe a couple of #7/8 picks. But their system goes way beyond that.

          When I looked at their system for a possible match for Betts, they had 12 guys as good or better than our best guy.

          Reply
      • marinersblue96

        4 years ago

        Unless you sign FA like Hamilton and AP against your GM’s wishes and you lose your top draft picks. That is how you affect your farm.

        Reply
    • 5toolMVP

      4 years ago

      He will “almost sign” a few top pitchers then sign JTR for 6/$130m or something.

      Reply
  22. DarkSide830

    4 years ago

    Hmm, Cronenworth would be an interesting addition to this trade.

    Reply
    • Rangers29

      4 years ago

      Kinda explain trying to get Kim so bad…

      I wonder if Kim values playing 3b or SS or playing for a contender? I’d take contender.

      Reply
      • DarkSide830

        4 years ago

        remember how much that was supposed to matter with Machado. if im honest, this is probably why he played his most 3B last year – value in versatility.

        Reply
    • lolzmets

      4 years ago

      Other than the fact that “hmm” is not actually a word, you just typed out a big boy complete sentence! For the first time, in 700 of your posts, on every single article. Somebody get this guy a cookie!

      Reply
  23. bot

    4 years ago

    Cubs will have to pay a hefty chunk of his remaining salary if they are gong to get a big prospect package from Padres.

    How much is Abrams worth?? Darvish and 30 mill for Abrams? That’ll create a ton of flexibility for competing padres team!

    Reply
    • Aaron Sapoznik

      4 years ago

      That or the Padres will try to attach an overvalued contract going back to the Cubs, someone like Wil Meyers. He would make sense since the Cubs currently only have two outfielders on their 40-man roster.

      Reply
  24. its_happening

    4 years ago

    Love him or hate him, Preller has guts. He’s bold for better or for worse.

    2
    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      tell me about it. cant believe Padres fans ragged on the guy before.

      Reply
      • Herc33

        4 years ago

        I think it goes in waves with how Padres fans fell about him. In 2015 everyone loved him, he was the “Rockstar” GM and the team was finally trying again. Then a year later he’s blowing the whole thing up to rebuild and we’re waiting 3-4 years to put a competitive team back out there, so there are going to be frustrations with that.

        People are naturally going to be upset when the quick fix doesn’t work and you have to go the long route. If nothing else though he really does make it interesting and you can’t say that the Padres aren’t trying, they’re constantly trying to put a better product on the field.

        Reply
    • Afk711

      4 years ago

      Sorry but real life fantasy baseball doesn’t work. He traded Trammell, France and more for Nola. Now wants to move Campusano to get a catcher from the Cubs? This guy is so erratic and the Padres window will not be open long because of it.

      1
      Reply
      • padreforlife

        4 years ago

        Bingo

        Reply
  25. Dunk Dunkington

    4 years ago

    Wonder what weak package Hoyer will accept

    Reply
  26. WillieS

    4 years ago

    Early prediction… Washington National’s will win second in three years!

    Reply
  27. bighiggy

    4 years ago

    Gore,paddock or moreJon has to be headliner right? If paddock, then weathers included? What seems like a possible return?

    Reply
    • gbs42

      4 years ago

      I like Darvish a lot, but I don’t see Gore in this deal.

      Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Not sure who Paddock is. Gore isn’t going for Darvish.

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        This is the third time that you posted that you don’t know who Paddack is. Is this an OCD issue? I wish you the best of luck if it is.

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          I never said I don’t know who Paddack is smart guy.

          Reply
        • Padres2019ha

          4 years ago

          Everyone is dump cept you, Ryan

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Well you clearly are considering your spelling, grammar, and ill-fated predictions that you refuse to address.

          Reply
        • bighiggy

          4 years ago

          It auto corrected to paddock, get a life

          3
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          Then why do you keep asking who he is?

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @JoeBrady because people keep talking this Paddock guy even though neither the Cubs nor the Padres currently employ anyone named Paddock.

          Reply
  28. Afk711

    4 years ago

    Today on “How much can the Padres spend to still not be better than the Dodgers?”

    2
    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      if they are the 2nd best in baseball then so be it. this team can hang with them in 5 or 7 and can now beat anyone in the AL.

      Reply
      • Tatsumaki

        4 years ago

        Again, this is how it looks now but none of the top free agents have signed still a long way to go. Padres still have no bullpen, we heard all these same things last year only for them to struggle with cards and get swept by dodgers. 62 games isn’t 162

        Reply
  29. mlb9229

    4 years ago

    Everyone keep in mind…no guarantee any of this will work out for the Padres. Like Heyman said, tough to name many bad trades by the Rays

    1
    Reply
    • jdgoat

      4 years ago

      The Rays get too much of a pass from the media because they were able to rip off the Pirates. The deals they win are rarely ever that bad for the other team, and they’ve gave up guys like Marquez, Cronenworth, and Odorizzi for not much of a return. Acquiring unheralded guys like Arozarena and Anderson is great and all, but it doesn’t matter since they’ll be gone the instant they make money.

      1
      Reply
      • Sideline Redwine

        4 years ago

        Please. JD Goat, you know better than this. The Rays have been making successful trades like this for years–the exceptions you mention do not discount that (Odorizzi is not that good, he is a four or five at best, and I am a fan!). Croenworth (sp?) had nowhere to go in TB: Franco, Brujan, Edwards…exactly who among that group would he beat out? And let’s ask for more than a year of success before we start saying how good someone is.

        Truth is the Rays do not get a “pass”–it is a successful organization that simply uses different methods to move forward. Anyone can pick out a trade or two that were not slam dunks, but approach the issue holistically: the Rays FO knows what it is doing. (and trust me, I have criticized many of the moves over the past five years, only to find out there is a reason I teach History and am not a GM lol)

        1
        Reply
        • DarkSide830

          4 years ago

          you can nitpick all you want, but the notion that they win every trade is clearly false. maybe they don’t lose trades, but there are plenty whre they are basically just getting equal value.

          Reply
        • jdgoat

          4 years ago

          They’ve made two amazing trades and had to give up a top prospect in one of them.

          Reply
        • 5toolMVP

          4 years ago

          Well if the Rays “lose a trade” it’s NOT costly like taking on some declining player with an absurd contract, it’s just a prospect that didn’t pan out. And chances are they recover some value and flip the prospect for someone else down the road.

          1
          Reply
        • Sideline Redwine

          4 years ago

          Never said they win every trade.

          What top prospect did they give up? You don’t mean Cronenworth, I presume. See my other posts about him.

          Don’t really understand all the butthurtedness regarding the Rays–are you both jealous? Jeez.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          Since 2017, they won Smyly, Longoria, the first Pham trade, the Archer Heist, Yandy, Anderson, and Aroazena

          Lost Colome.

          There were a few other trades of little consequence, or that I deemed too early to judge. But to say they’ve done well is a no-doubter.

          Reply
        • jdgoat

          4 years ago

          Liberatore was the top prospect. There’s nothing wrong with questioning a teams desire to win. If the Rays wanted to win a World Series, Snell would not be traded. They might win the trade though. Trust me, I’m not jealous of a team that wants to win the latter.

          Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          “The Archer Heist” ha

          Reply
  30. Logjammer D"Baggagecling

    4 years ago

    Cubs need to stop selling and buy. Wtf. They’re still a very good team. A rebuild is not needed.

    The Padres farm is great but what 3 players (minimum) that are from medium touted to highly touted can they send the cubs?

    Reply
    • Rangers29

      4 years ago

      Idk, I think a good trade of an expensive and aging Darvish would be a great first step to Hoyer’s tenure.

      1
      Reply
    • Wadz

      4 years ago

      Theyre in the middle of the pack..

      The NL today is 3 teams deep and mediocrity..

      Reply
    • jdgoat

      4 years ago

      But the owners are so poor! Don’t you feel bad for them?

      1
      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Having 4 billion dollars just im the value of the cubs is not being broke. Joe Ricketts is the co-founder of TD Ameritrade. He’s definitely not broke.

        Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          Wow, you are really great at picking up sarcasm, like the best in the world probably. Definitely the smartest person in this comment section- for sure! 😉

          1
          Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        I’m not sure what the point is. I assume that everyone that owns a ML team is wealthy. Such is life.

        Reply
    • CheeseHeadPadre

      4 years ago

      They only have 1 year left of being competitive unless they can find a way to resign all their talent that’s about to hit free agency, and then they can’t buy fringe pieces around them like they did before. I think the White Sox saw similar writing on the wall when they tore it down. The Cubs could learn fron their cross town rival before they are mired in mediocrity for another handful of years.

      1
      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        They need to extend rizzo and baez. Contreras has two years left. Trading Contreras would be a terrible mistake. You dont trade the 2nd best catcher in baseball for mediocre players.

        Reply
      • stymeedone

        4 years ago

        @CHpadre
        White Sox didn’t move the expensive pieces. They traded away the cheap young cost controlled talent. It would be like the Cubs trading away Rizzo, Baez, and Bryant before winning the Series. Instead, Cubs added the pieces needed and won. Every window closes. Only the White Sox would move young cost controlled players like Sale, Quintana, Eaton and Sieman, before the window even opened. Three of the four have rings, and Sieman has played in quite a few playoff games. Can only wonder what they could have done together. No such questions with the Cubs.

        1
        Reply
    • Whifff

      4 years ago

      Wrek, do you ever watch baseball in October? The Cubs are a very good team?

      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Whifff
        5 playoff appearances in 6 seasons. Is pretty good. Short season aside. All talking heads said the cubs at best would be a 4th place team with the reds and Cardinals. Being 1st and 2nd.

        Early exit or not. It’s not easy getting to the playoffs. The Marlins sweeping was a fluke. An the extra team and round didn’t help. Really hope it was only for this year. I’d rather not see a .500 team squeak into the playoffs. Imagine the Orioles going 81-81 winning the wild card. Getting hot the last 8 or 9 games of the season and sweeping their way into the world series. Kinda like the Rockies in 2007. Won 22 of of 23 only to get swept by the red Sox

        Reply
  31. Cosmo2

    4 years ago

    Padres deep into needing to start their next rebuild by 2022… maybe not but they’re playing the same dangerous, zero patience, all-in on big names game they played in ‘15.

    1
    Reply
    • Wadz

      4 years ago

      Except in 2015, they had a mediocre team with no depth and farm….

      Now they are the clear 2nd or 3rd best team in the NL and still have a top-level young core and farm..

      Completely different.

      2
      Reply
      • Cosmo2

        4 years ago

        Yea it’s different. Still a bit of the same, jumping the gun, vibe. But yea they’re a much better team coming off ‘20 than they were in ‘14

        Reply
      • Tatsumaki

        4 years ago

        @wadz completely different how? Padres aren’t big spenders and are trading prospect capital for major league talent that gets expensive in 2/3 years. Padres won’t be spending 200 million on a roster to compete with dodgers. So when they extended tatis for 10-12 years coupled with hosmer and machado how is this sustainable? Making these moves shows they are going for it for 2/3 years and then effectively having to start over again

        1
        Reply
  32. DTDATL

    4 years ago

    I think people will end up being surprised at how little the Cubs will get back. That’s a lot of money and mixed production so the prospect haul won’t be great.

    3
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      I disagree. Unless it involves bad contracts.

      Reply
  33. rememberthecoop

    4 years ago

    If they get Gore it will be worth it. But I seriously doubt it.

    1
    Reply
    • Herc33

      4 years ago

      Gore would be a massive overpay. He’s a MLB ready consensus top 5 prospect and is way too valuable to trade, let alone for a 34 year old SP who makes 20M+ a year.

      1
      Reply
    • Sideline Redwine

      4 years ago

      Gore is not leaving SD, and especially not for Yu.

      1
      Reply
  34. Greenmamba559

    4 years ago

    Preller must’ve had a hell of a christmas, good for the padres though it’s nice seeing a team go for it. This would definitely puts them in the top 3 NL on paper at least.

    Reply
  35. jacobsigel1025

    4 years ago

    I can see this deal being Cronenworth, either Morejon or Weathers, plus 2 low level guys

    1
    Reply
    • Ma4170

      4 years ago

      I was thinking cronenworth and Morejón only

      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Its gonna be minimum 3 players. 5 if they want Contreas

        Reply
  36. Padres2019ha

    4 years ago

    What would all you nerds have to talk about if it wasn’t for Darth Preller and keeping baseball interesting? Time to stop the hate. Preller is a stable genius w balls!

    4
    Reply
    • 8ManLineupNoPitcherNoDH

      4 years ago

      Maybe wait until he’s actually done so to proclaim him a “genius.”

      1
      Reply
      • 8ManLineupNoPitcherNoDH

        4 years ago

        Won a WS, I mean

        Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Genius that traded Trea Turner and Max Fried, traded Yasmani Grandal for POS Kemp and gave Eric Hosmer $144m?

      3
      Reply
      • Padres2019ha

        4 years ago

        Go away Ryan

        1
        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          I love how you have to deflect to that because you get your ass handed to you when you try to actually debate with facts.

          By the way, have the Padres traded Wil Myers for Noah Syndergaard yet? Or traded for JT Realmuto or Trevor Bauer and “just extended” them yet?

          2
          Reply
      • 8ManLineupNoPitcherNoDH

        4 years ago

        Homer padres fan ROASTED!

        Reply
    • lambeau gang

      4 years ago

      Preller’s more of a snake than anything. I’ll always remember him for his moves at the 2016 trade deadline. He hid knowledge of Colin Rea’s arm injury in the Andrew Cashner-to-Miami deal, and he did the same thing with Drew Pomeranz’s medicals before trading him to the Red Sox. But as karma would have it, the Padres traded away Luis Castillo and ended up with an injured and ineffective Anderson Espinoza, so I guess what goes around comes around.

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        ^ Implying that the Red Sox didn’t hide knowledge of Espinoza’s arm injury and that the Marlins didn’t hide knowledge of Paddack and Capps’ arm injuries.

        1
        Reply
        • lambeau gang

          4 years ago

          First of all, the Espinoza injury occurred in 2017, the next season, so it’s completely irrelevant to the information shared at the 2016 trade deadline. Secondly, Capps was already injured before the trade, and the Marlins disclosed that information. Thirdly, Paddack was part of a separate deal and he did not get hurt in his first start after being acquired as Pomeranz and Rea did. Preller was suspended for his deceptiveness, and the baseball gods merely repayed him for his misdeeds.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @lambeau gang First of all, Pomeranz has been healthy a much greater percentage of the time since that trade than Espinoza. Secondly, the Braves were apparently the unnamed fourth team that took issue with the Padres’ medicals and the player in question was Max Fried, who also had TJ BEFORE he was traded, rather than after. So if the Braves can complain about that, the Padres can do the same with Capps. Especially when Fried turned out just fine for Atlanta while the Padres can’t say the same for Capps. Thirdly, Paddack got hurt in his THIRD start in the Padres org and Pomeranz did not get hurt in his first start as a Red Sox, or any start as a Red Sox. Learn your history pal!

          1
          Reply
  37. Dmerr6363

    4 years ago

    Cubs fans you are not getting gore!.

    2
    Reply
  38. 8ManLineupNoPitcherNoDH

    4 years ago

    “Alternatively, if the Cubs were to send an outfielder with a notable salary back to Chicago…”

    Reply
  39. CheeseHeadPadre

    4 years ago

    I’m not a fan of Darvish, personally. I’m quite surprised how many commenters have been yelling about how much trade value he has. (For the record, nowhere near as much as Snell) I’m not a huge fan of going after him too unless you can get him on a package that is rather light, but then why would the Cubs do it unless they do a full tear down. I think they should, but doesn’t seem to be the direction they’re going in.

    That being said, man that rotation would be pretty sweet. A lot of quality position player depth is needed to compete with the Dodgers in a full season, but this wouldn’t hurt. Surprised they have the budget for it unless they’re moving Myers in that direction, who I’d rather have for the next 3 years than Darvish.

    How barren is this system gonna be? I would guess they think very highly of a lot of the younger minors players to make the loss of the prospect capital acceptable with the big league team in the position it is.

    Reply
    • bkbk

      4 years ago

      You’re nuts. All his peripherals for a season and a half have him as a top 5 pitcher in baseball. He also seems like a pitcher who is likely to age well given that he gets people out on deception and command versus “stuff” as he gets older.

      I bet this deal works out better than Snell, not only on the pads return, but because Patino is going to be a Cy Young candidate one day.

      Reply
    • Herc33

      4 years ago

      I’m pretty sure that even if they traded like Weathers, Morejon, and a couple of guys from the 20-30 range on their team list they would still rank in the top 10 of all systems in terms of prospect capital.

      They’re pretty stacked even with all of the guys they shipped out last year. Still would have Gore, Campusano, Abrams, Hassell, as top 100 type prospects. Its a really deep system, to a certain extent they’ve had to trade away prospects because they don’t have enough 40 man roster spots for them.

      Reply
      • CheeseHeadPadre

        4 years ago

        Funny that I commented dang near the same thing as a reply to another commenter Nichols. I definitely agree.

        That being said, personally there’s no way I trade Weathers and Morejon for Darvish. Too much risk in his profile to justify it. Some of the homegrown top prospects need to stick around to have some quality low salaried players on the roster.

        Reply
  40. Aaron Sapoznik

    4 years ago

    Padres doubling down on the top TOR trade candidates!

    Reply
  41. Firefraudman

    4 years ago

    So the Padres are trying to buying a championship or does that only get said about the Yankees/Dodgers?

    Reply
    • Wadz

      4 years ago

      Who are they buying again??

      Those lazy narratives against the Dodgers are also made by dolts.

      Reply
      • Firefraudman

        4 years ago

        I guess Machado, Hosmer, Clevinger, Snell and maybe Darvish?

        If you look at the rosters the “buying players” narrative actually fits SD better but you’re right. It’s a lazy narrative.

        Reply
    • Padres2019ha

      4 years ago

      Buying is done through Free Agency. This is.maneuvering within a budget using current prospect and roster capital. But thanks for trying.

      Reply
      • Firefraudman

        4 years ago

        Okay so you guys are trying to buy a championship with Kim and Machado a few years ago?

        Reply
        • Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA

          4 years ago

          Both concepts of the narrative are idiotic. Kim, Machado, Hosmer who cares? The narrative is a lazy excuse whether you’re talking about the Dodgers or Padres. No team is built solely on home grown prospects, so objectively unless you are living on low level free agents to fill in the gaps all competitive teams can be considered trying to buy a championship. The Padres exploited the international market loop hole, the Dodgers did as well. The Padres have lived at the top of FA market the last few offseasons while Dodgers haven’t. The major difference we’re talking about here is the Dodgers have drafted/developed extremely well re upping their core pieces. The Padres on the other hand tanked to build up their pieces. At the end of the day it’s still an entertainment business, good on the Pads for trying to win. Whoever thought trying to win is a bad thing kind of boggles my mind.

          1
          Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        Don’t listen to this girl. She also said two years ago that the Mets should trade Noah Syndergaard for Wil Myers and that the Padres should buy JT Realmuto at peak value so that they could flip him at the deadline (at what would have been a SIGNIFICANT loss).

        Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      tired concept

      Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      Silly comment. The Padres are using prospects. As a RS fan, I can only dream of this type of depth.

      Reply
      • UnknownPoster

        4 years ago

        …. did the dodgers not use prospect capital to improve their team almost universally over FA in the last 3 years? Their biggest FA deal was Pollock on a discount

        Any justification for why it doesn’t qualify the Padres as “buying a roster” applies 2 fold to LA, if you actually care to look at the roster

        1
        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          …. did the dodgers not use prospect capital to improve their team almost universally over FA in the last 3 years?
          ———————————————————-
          LAD has done a marvelous job developing young talent. I just have no idea what that has to do with my comment on the Padres.

          Reply
  42. madmanTX

    4 years ago

    Good. Let the Padres use all their talent and money on these guys and they won’t be players for other guys anymore.

    1
    Reply
  43. bkbk

    4 years ago

    Im calling it.

    Padres get: Darvish and a flyer low ball guy
    Cubs get: Myers (plus cash), Cronenworth, Weathers and someone like Yeson Santana or a low infielder

    book it

    Reply
    • 8ManLineupNoPitcherNoDH

      4 years ago

      no one wants myers

      1
      Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      the Cubs want to shed payroll. Myers doesnt help there.

      Reply
    • Robert-5

      4 years ago

      Could be right. I’ll agree w the 8man, no one wants Myers, but to get a decent return and move all (or most) of Darvish’s contract, Hoyer will have to be creative. Cubs do have a current hole in LF and a weak farm w no clear solution waiting for a chance.
      At this point, Cubs should think hard about a full-on rebuild. At min a strong shakeup is req’d

      Reply
      • rondon

        4 years ago

        But if Contreras is included, that changes to whole deal. A 2 time all star catcher with 2 very affordable years of control means the Padres have to pony up a better deal.

        1
        Reply
  44. Stevil

    4 years ago

    If they’re looking to remain in contention, which they should, getting a viable arm back would make sense.

    Cronenworth would be a steep price without another player coming over from Chicago.

    Reply
    • UnknownPoster

      4 years ago

      Cronenwerth hit like a utility infielder for half of 2020. You need to stop pretending he’s a god. He’s just… ok

      Reply
      • Stevil

        4 years ago

        You should quit with the hyperbole and try actually reading what is being discussed rationally.

        By the way, be sure to check this out…. mlbtraderumors.com/2020/12/quick-hits-cronenworth-…

        Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Hyperbole? He posted a 534 OPS (yeah OPS) in the month of September. Both his On base percentage AND slugging were below .300. What exactly is hyperbole? He cratered in Sept. that’s fact bro

          You should quit with the attacks when I was right on point. Deal with reality

          Reply
        • Stevil

          4 years ago

          Yes, hyperbole. You’re exaggerating everything. Nobody has suggested that Cronenworth is an elite player that isn’t moveable, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t valuable for what he does offer, and citing a single statistic for a single month doesn’t help your argument.

          You weren’t on point with anything. The trade has been made and guess who wasn’t a part of it and what is going to Chicago in the return? Care to guess? This is from my original comment: “If they’re looking to remain in contention, which they should, getting a viable arm back would make sense.”

          Take your own advice: quit with the attacks when I was ‘right on point’ and ‘deal with reality’.

          Reply
  45. David Herrick

    4 years ago

    Cubs – Darvish and Contreras

    Padres – Myers, Abrams, Campusano, Morejon, and Lucchesi.

    Padres rotation – Darvish, Snell, Lamet, Paddack, and Davies (Gore begins year in Minors, promoted later in year to spot start and relief).

    1B – Hosmer
    2B – Kim
    SS – Tatis
    3B – Machado
    LF – Pham
    CF – Grisham
    RF – Cronenworth / Ona

    Wow!! World Series favorites. That would be an incredible turn of events!! Gotta admire the boldness if this comes to pass!!

    Reply
    • bkbk

      4 years ago

      No chance. This team is swimming in catching prospects, why would they pay for contreras?

      Reply
      • David Herrick

        4 years ago

        Because Contreras is a top three ML catcher in his prime, while Campusano is facing legal problems (I know marijuana, it’ll be resolved, so he’ll be back at baseball sometime in 2021). Contreras is also a legitimate DH option.

        Did you notice that the Padres just traded Hunt and Mejia?

        Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Contreas can get 3 players by himself.

      So make it Caratini or miguel Amaya instead.

      Reply
    • Spare Tire Dixon

      4 years ago

      The Padres will be upgraded, no doubt. Not even the favorite in their division, let alone World Series.

      1
      Reply
    • Tatsumaki

      4 years ago

      Sorry to burst the bubble but that isn’t better than dodgers lol

      1
      Reply
  46. metsie1

    4 years ago

    Good to see a team be aggressive and go after what they need. Don’t know how it will work out for them but hey they are doing more than just talking about making moves.

    1
    Reply
  47. Ma4170

    4 years ago

    I’m not the president of the Darvish fan club, but he takes a lot of crap on here for a guy w 3.47/1.16 125 era+ 3.43 fip 3.5k/bb lifetime numbers… last two years 3.40/1.06… 2018 was really his only bad year and he was hurt… he’s not top tier but he’s a solid number 2 sp… that has trade value

    Reply
    • Cora the Destroya

      4 years ago

      When healthy, I would have him as a #1. Been in big games, almost threw a couple no hitters.

      1
      Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      volatility and health are issues here. if he can stay healthy (and therefore probably more effective) then he’s well worth the money

      1
      Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      I agree. Too many posters don’t bother with the numbers. IMO< there is no chance he is worth a Gore. But he definitely has surplus value.

      1
      Reply
      • Ma4170

        4 years ago

        Yeah he’s not bringing back a top 10 MLB prospect like gore, but he’ll get a good return

        Reply
    • CalcetinesBlancos

      4 years ago

      He also takes forever to throw the ball, is hurt all the time, and thinks Yelich is incapable of raking against him without cheating lol.

      Reply
    • Robert-5

      4 years ago

      “He’s not top tier but he’s a solid number 2 sp…” yeah, if you have Trevor Bauer on your team.

      Reply
  48. old dodger fan

    4 years ago

    Last year the 2 best teams in the NL were in the West. Looks like it’s going to happen again. .Dodgers losing Kike Hernandez, Joc Pederson, Justin Turner and Blake Treinen and so far added nothing but a relief pitcher coming off TJ surgery. I’m guessing SD will be favored. Should be a great season. Whoever stays healthy should win.

    Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      4 years ago

      Dodgers ain’t done. If you were hoping that Trevor Bauer would end up on your team and your team isn’t the Dodgers, watch out.

      Reply
  49. seamaholic 2

    4 years ago

    If this happens AND Kim, Padres will be somewhere around $175-180m in payroll. One of the biggest in baseball.

    Reply
  50. Miles1002

    4 years ago

    This is all starting to remind me of 2015. Tons of big moves to win the off season but it kills a farm system. If this happens, this is another win now move.

    AJ is setting himself up to either win a WS in the next 3 years or be fired within 2 if he doesn’t deliver huge results. As a Dodgers fan, I’ll sit back on my couch and watch as it all goes up in flames. But still, best of luck this season, should be entertaining to watch.

    3
    Reply
    • Herc33

      4 years ago

      I think this is way different than 2015. For one thing, the Padres farm system wasn’t as good pre AJ Preller. It was like a pretty average farm, whereas the current one is consistently like a top 5 farm and is much deeper. If you look at all the names they shipped out in 2015, really the only prospects that ended up being solid were Fried and Turner because the system was a lot of mediocre high floor/low ceiling guys.

      Also the 2014 Padres were not good and they didn’t have a core to build around. They wanted to compete immediately so they just started acquiring pieces without any foundation. The 2020 Padres have a good enough core to build around, so it actually makes sense to make “win-now” type moves at this stage.

      2
      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        They also traded Yasmani Grandal for an underwater contract. Would have been better off just non-tendering Grandal.

        Reply
  51. DarkSide830

    4 years ago

    breaking news – everyone to the Padres

    1
    Reply
    • LordD99

      4 years ago

      They’re the opposite of the Jays,

      Reply
  52. Logjammer D"Baggagecling

    4 years ago

    Now the Padres want Contreas or Caratini. Just for Contreas thats at least 2 players. Caratini would be a starter on at least 15 teams. I can see caratini and darvish for a massive return. Probbaly 5 for 2. Hopefully its not Jake Cronsworth.

    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      might be even more then 5 when you factor in lottery tickets

      Reply
  53. Deleted_User

    4 years ago

    Lol still trying to acquire all the catchers I see.

    Reply
  54. letimmysmoke55

    4 years ago

    still won’t win a ring

    Reply
  55. sandman12

    4 years ago

    Due to his salary commitment, Darvish only has a trade value of $20M. Here’s the Padres shopping list of values: baseballtradevalues.com/teams/529/

    If Cubs add money or take on Myers, the shopping bag can be filled with considerably more. Adding Contreras would add $30M of value from Cubs side.

    Reply
    • UnknownPoster

      4 years ago

      Please please please do not use BTV as some end all, be all. It’s not realistic

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        I wouldn’t use them for trade values, but the excess value for Darvish & Contreras seems about right. The importance of that is that it gives you a baseline for the excess value you need in return.

        Reply
  56. its_happening

    4 years ago

    With the discussions over pitching and Realmuto, the Jays should be all over the Cubs with a proposal involving Darvish and Contreras. Jays could sweeten the deal by taking Bryant and Kimbrel off their hands and offering Teoscar along with prospects.

    Reply
    • Spare Tire Dixon

      4 years ago

      Interesting idea. The Jays definitely have spots for Contreras, Bryant, and Darvish.

      Reply
      • its_happening

        4 years ago

        And the Cubs have a LF spot open for Teoscar. But it appears the Padres are hustling like there’s no tomorrow.

        Reply
    • drasco036

      4 years ago

      I doubt the Cubs view Bryant as this some kind of sunk cost player. I would have assumed, if that was the case, they would have non-tendered him like they did Schwarber.

      Then again, I’ve been wrong about everything this off season. I mean Brad Hand cleared waivers and Robbie Ray signed for 8 million…

      Reply
      • its_happening

        4 years ago

        I don’t know what I said to imply Bryant is a sunk cost. I don’t believe he is. There are teams in-need of a 3B and Bryant would fill the void.

        However, I do believe the way to deal Bryant to a team is to package him with another player like Darvish and/or Contreras.

        Ray was signed for $8-mil thanks to some clueless executives in Toronto. Not saying it’s Atkins. They still have holdovers from the Ricciardi era and they should have rid themselves of that entire time period altogether. Their talent assessment was abysmal which explains why the Jays still have trouble.

        Reply
  57. Mr. E Team

    4 years ago

    What if this is the year that the wheels fall off for Kershaw? Despite the light workload last year, he has a trajectory like Pedro Martinez who was last both great and reliable at 34. He is also quite similar to Sandy Koufax, though modern medicine might have kept him pitching past 30.
    If the Padres anticipate weakness, they should seize on it.

    1
    Reply
    • UnknownPoster

      4 years ago

      Hahahahha. Kershaw had his best year in the last 3 last year

      What a homer. “Maybe he‘ll suck magically. We can hope!”

      Reply
  58. Reuven

    4 years ago

    I wonder if Preller emaied Austin Nola to wish him a happy birthday today before or after the news came out that they’re looking at bringing in a two-time All-Star catcher to the team?

    Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      My guess is it would be Caratini, Yu’s personal catcher, going to the Padres before it would be Contreras.

      Reply
    • windmill_noise_causes_cancer

      4 years ago

      He can play other positions.

      Reply
    • Rsox

      4 years ago

      Nola would still be the backup Catcher and can also play 1B/2B/3B. I think he’ll be ok

      Reply
  59. CalcetinesBlancos

    4 years ago

    Cubs fans probably think Hoyer is asking for Tatis lol.

    1
    Reply
    • 1984wasntamanual

      4 years ago

      They’re trading Yu Darvish, not James Shields

      1
      Reply
  60. JoeBrady

    4 years ago

    This feels a little like the Cubs planted the story. After the Snell trade, a couple of people wondered why the Cubs weren’t in the mix, assuming that they really want to trade Darvish. This could be to save face that Darvish wasn’t moved. Or it could be that the Padres are out of the trade mix, and the Cubs are trying to invent an auction battle.

    Reply
  61. Enrico Pallazzo

    4 years ago

    So why did they trade valuable prospects for Nola if they’re just going to turn around and ship off more prospects for another catcher? Also makes me wonder if they know something about Lamet that hasn’t been revealed yet. Would make sense to go out and get Snell and Darvish if they know that Lamet is hurt bad on top of Clevinger.

    1
    Reply
    • Ma4170

      4 years ago

      Was thinking that too, that Lamet may be our for significant time

      1
      Reply
  62. Never Remember

    4 years ago

    So Gore to Cubs? Wow! That is a good trade for both sides.

    1
    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      No one the Cubs have in their organization is getting MacKenzie Gore.

      Reply
  63. Geno55

    4 years ago

    I’m an Angels fan & San Diego Padres fan Padres are building one heck of a pitching staff could be the best in the majors San Diego Has a deep farm system Going all In

    Go Padres

    Reply
    • Tatsumaki

      4 years ago

      Geno55 is what we call a bandwagoner. Was probably an angels fan and got sick of losing and figured that San Diego is as close to Orange County as oc is to la.

      Reply
  64. ChiSoxCity

    4 years ago

    Any trade involving Darvish better be followed up with deals involving Bryant as well.

    2
    Reply
    • SCHWING and A Miss

      4 years ago

      Probably will, Nats for Kieboom or along those lines

      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Kieboom and who else? Bryant will get 2 players back.

        Reply
        • SCHWING and A Miss

          4 years ago

          Maybe, maybe not. Cubs are dumping salary and no one is going to do them a solid just cause…Kieboom straight up might be enough.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          Bryant’s excess value is not that much. He’s worth his $19M, but certainly not $29M. So you are talking excess value of certainly less than $10M. Despite Kieboom’s weak start, that would be a steal by the Cubs.

          1
          Reply
    • Whifff

      4 years ago

      Cutting Schwarber and keeping Bryant pre-arb, at 2.5 times Schwarber’s price made absolutely zero sense. The Cubs have no plan. If they trade their starting rotation now, then paying Bryant $19mil gets even dumber, if that is possible.

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        Schwarber might not land a regular job. He has a career bWAR of 1.7/650. And since he cannot hit lefties, and cannot field, he will never even gt the 650 PAs required to get his 1.7 WAR.

        Bryant has had some injury problems, but a healthy Bryant is at least a 4 WAR player.

        Reply
  65. SCHWING and A Miss

    4 years ago

    Yu kidding me!?

    Reply
    • baseballpun

      4 years ago

      Pee-yew, Yu Snell!

      2
      Reply
      • SCHWING and A Miss

        4 years ago

        Well played….I felt shame as soon as I hit submit so your words sting slightly less

        Reply
  66. lambeau gang

    4 years ago

    Sounds like Preller is flying a bit too close to the sun. On paper, an acquisition of 2018-level Snell and 2020-level Darvish is impressive, but given their injury histories, both player’s contracts could turn into albatrosses if they can’t sustain their health or success (which is very likely). That’s on top of on-again-off-again showings from expensive pieces like Wil Myers, Hoz and Manny over the years. That’s the very definition of a boom-or-bust situation.

    Reply
    • baseballpun

      4 years ago

      Snell isn’t making enough to be an albatross. Darvish is only under contract for two more years after 2021, at $19m and $18m.

      Reply
    • A Seal

      4 years ago

      And wait until their squad of youngsters get expensive. The Dodgers own the NL because they don’t just trade for every single superstar and wait for their chance.

      This could make the best team in major league history. But it also could make a wreck.

      Padres need to work on their staff, My Dodgers are really good at turning underrated players into superstars and to keep players from getting injured, Padres have injuries after injuries.

      SD has always gotten off to great starts the past few years and fallen off track. The 60 game performance last year means nothing if they can’t sustain it.

      We in LA need a good RHH, but we need to not overpay and wait for the right one. Snell was acquired because we can’t hit lefties and will get even worse if we don’t resign Turner,

      Still, I’m confident the Dodgers are better and anyways, one or more of the under the radar signings we made will likely turn out to be a great piece. Snell May fail. Darkish will more likely than not. I’m not ultra worried, and anyways, all my energy is going to flipping the senate January 5.

      1
      Reply
  67. bravesfan

    4 years ago

    I almost want to see it, sure do I wish my Braves made this kind of push… but it’s better than seeing a team like the Yankees or Dodgers making such moves. I’d love to see the Padres get both Contreras and Yu

    Reply
  68. Rangers29

    4 years ago

    Dangit, Bob just cursed it. No trade here folks.

    BTW, When is Bauer gonna sign after all the big names on the trade market are gone?

    Reply
    • baseballpun

      4 years ago

      Mets.

      Reply
  69. Kapostatuz

    4 years ago

    I love this from the Padres, they gonna set off the domino effect

    Reply
  70. Logjammer D"Baggagecling

    4 years ago

    So Darvish for Adrian Morejon and 2 others would get the deal done. I dont think Jed Hoyer is that dumb to get a ian Stewart package back. One of the worst trades in Theos tenure with the Cubs. Eloy for Quintana was bad too.

    Reply
  71. James Midway

    4 years ago

    For those thinking Gore would be involved in this, that is 1000% not happening

    2
    Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Yes we know. It will be Morejon and 2 others. Maybe Jake Cronsworth. Not sure how he is in LF

      Reply
      • Priggs89

        4 years ago

        Man, you’re not even close with that guess. This has to be depressing for you.

        2
        Reply
    • hyraxwithaflamethrower

      4 years ago

      Totally agree. It is impressive, though, that their farm system was deep enough to bring over Clevinger, Snell, and Darvish, all while keeping their #1 prospect. That farm won’t be elite anymore, but it’ll still have some good talent. These trades shorten their window, but maximize their potential during that window.

      Reply
  72. bitterpadresfan

    4 years ago

    If Darvish was a free agent i can’t imagine he would get much more than what he is signed for. A lot of risk in that contract. I don’t know how much surplus value there is. That said I’m sure we will give up a lot more than any rational gm would be comfortable with.

    Reply
    • hyraxwithaflamethrower

      4 years ago

      I have no idea why you’d be bitter. They are going for it and all of the guys they’ve gotten/are getting are signed through at least 2022. Darvish and Snell through 2023. In 2022, they could have four pitchers (those two, Clevinger, and Lamet) capable of being All-Stars, maybe even contending for the CYA. And that doesn’t include any of their other young guys, like Gore. They also might have one of the league’s best offenses (though I think a couple of their guys played above their heads this year). Your window isn’t going to be 6-7 years anymore, but if you get Darvish, it’s as open as any team’s in the league, Dodgers included.

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        I agree 100%. I like my prospects as much as anyone else. But my most recent wish list was Castillo & Moose for Downs+. I’d rather have three years of Castillo than 6 years of Downs basically.

        Unlike say, Cincinnati, who traded Downs and Grey for one year of Puig. In SD’s spot, they are one of the top teams in BB with Snell. Adding Darvish might make them the best team in BB.

        Reply
      • bitterpadresfan

        4 years ago

        I have been a Padres for 25 years.
        Outside of about a five year run its been pretty lean in SD.

        Reply
  73. rognog

    4 years ago

    When your prospects graduate and actually perform then you can sell the next ones to round out the team and go after winning something other than lists. Some people seem to be fans of compiling assets or want to be over .500 for the rest of time instead of trying to win the whole thing. As a Dodger fan the road out of the NL just became much more difficult.

    1
    Reply
    • LordD99

      4 years ago

      Exactly. Most fans have a loser’s mentality. They want the hope of competing, but they don’t want their teams to go all in and win. The Padres is a win-now team. Glad they’re moving assets to try and win. Few teams can do what the Dodgers do and win while compiling and holding assets. That takes money. Most other teams have to know when to go all in. Preller is all in.

      3
      Reply
  74. angt222

    4 years ago

    Any chance SD flips Myers to CHC in a package?

    Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      I’m guessing Myers will be part of the Darvish deal. Myers, Morejon and one other. Morejon and Cronsworth could get a deal done…. maybe. There was tslk of Luis Campsuano too.

      Reply
      • mlb1225

        4 years ago

        I was thinking more like Cronenworth+Pham+mid-tier prospect. Part of the reason they’re trading Darvish is to shed salary and Myers only adds salary. Pham, while not cheap helps offset the money somewhat but isn’t nearly the same price as Myers.

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Tommy Pham isn’t an “offset money” guy. If he was, he’d have been non-tendered.

          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          Yeah I was only speculating. Wasn’t sure what Myers contract looked like.

          Reply
        • mlb1225

          4 years ago

          He isn’t soley an offset salary guy, but if he were traded, that’s partially what he would be. The Cubs could use another outfieler after they NT’d Schwarber anyway.

          1
          Reply
        • lowtalker1

          4 years ago

          Cronenworth plays left now you can have Guerra

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @mlb1225 Pham isn’t any kind of salary offset guy. If he was, he’d have simply been non-tendered. Cut and dry.

          Reply
        • libertyfighter

          4 years ago

          Darvish is owed $20 million more than Myers

          Reply
        • mlb1225

          4 years ago

          Not necessarily. I’m not saying they view him as that, but if he’s in a trade for a high priced player like Darvish, it would make sense to put him in the trade. It offsets salary a bit and gives the Cubs a left fielder after NTing Schwarber. He’s not soley in the trade for salary difference.

          Reply
        • mlb1225

          4 years ago

          I see that now. I forgot the third year was an option year.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @mlb1225 but you are arguing that the Padres would trade him just to get rid of his salary. They clearly aren’t interested in just “getting rid of” his salary otherwise they’d have non-tendered him. They are going to want something for him (which in this case would be them giving up less in the trade than they would without Pham’s inclusion). Anyway, trading Darvish means the Cubs are punting on 2021 so I’m not sure why they would have any interest in the rental Pham.

          Reply
  75. LordD99

    4 years ago

    Looks like someone put an extra cup of sugar in AJ’s coffee yesterday.

    As I noted yesterday to an unhappy Cubs fan who thought the trade for Snell meant Darvish wouldn’t be moved. Never underestimate Preller’s desire to make moves once he’s in motion. Darvish might still be a Padre.

    Happy to see a win-now team is actually trying to win now and not be afraid to spend money and not be afraid to move prospects for actual good major leaguers.

    Beyond that, the speculation that “talks between the Cubs and Padres could be expanded to include one of Willson Contreras or Victor Caratini” is interesting, and I’d have a comment on that, but I’m a bit distracted at the moment trying to make a decision on my new home and I’m down to either Beverly Hills or Detroit.

    1
    Reply
    • A Seal

      4 years ago

      Win Now teams like the Dodgers don’t go for any star in sight. We wait for the best one to come. We could have gotten Bryce Harper. Look what happened with him. Instead we got Mookie. Look what happened, Going after any star is sight is a recipe to lose.

      Reply
      • LordD99

        4 years ago

        The Padres are not the Dodgers financially, which is what enables the Dodgers to win consistently. Of course, you know that, but it appears you are concerned that the Padres might be a real threat. I have no horse in this race as I’m not a Padres or Dodgers fan. I am seeing quite a few Dodgers fans jumping in this thread, which is telling.

        6
        Reply
        • laswagn

          4 years ago

          In this thread? There are Dodgers fans in every MLBTR thread.

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Are you drunk? The Padres are about to have a 180M+ payroll

          They are in San Diego. It’s NOT A SMALL TOWN. They have a massive TV deal. They could have spent like this for half a decade. They are just doing it now. Stop with the Padres have no money BS. It is just that, BS

          And we’re in this thread because nothing else is happening and we are baseball fans. Get over yourself. No dodger fan is scared now. No one

          1
          Reply
        • Magnum

          4 years ago

          Exactly

          Reply
      • youcannnnnputitontheboard

        4 years ago

        What happened with Bryce?

        Reply
    • bobtillman

      4 years ago

      Lots of cheap property in Mara Lago these days…

      Reply
      • whyhayzee

        4 years ago

        Swamp.

        Reply
    • David Herrick

      4 years ago

      lordd99, pretty sure I am the Cubs fan you’re talking about. If Preller can get Darvish and Contreras from the Cubs that would be pretty amazing. That would be SOME TEAM in San Diego!!!

      C – Contreras, Nola
      1B – Hosmer
      2B – Kim / Cronenworth
      SS – Tatis
      3B – Machado
      LF – Pham
      CF – Grisham
      RF – Cronenworth / Ona (whoever??)
      DH – rotated (Contreras, Nola, etc.)

      Darvish, Snell, Lamet, Paddack, and Davies (Gore starts in Minors but by mid-season spot starting / bullpen).

      I don’t think, from the Padres’s perspective, it makes much sense to trade Cronenworth if the goal is to win a World Series in the next three years. I also don’t get Campusano being included as the Cubs have Amaya and Caratini (however, sure get whatever value back you can).

      I could see Darvish and Contreras for Myers, Abrams, Hassell, Lucchesi, and Morejon. Maybe exchange Hassell for Head or Mena? I can’t imagine both of those pieces leaving Chicago without Abrams included. I know he’s supremely talented, and there certainly could be enough value going to Chicago without Abrams included, but those are two impact talents leaving the Cubs for “solid not spectacular” players (unless Abrams is included). It’s probably enough value for Myers, Abrams, Lucchesi, and Morejon simply being the return. But Weathers or Head or Mena or Hassell would be a nice fifth player to finish the deal.

      1
      Reply
  76. lowtalker1

    4 years ago

    “Welllllll…. we’re waiting” caddy shack

    Reply
  77. DarkSide830

    4 years ago

    Campusano has to be in it if Willson is going

    1
    Reply
  78. anthonyd4412

    4 years ago

    Campusano makes no sense with Amaya a year (if that) away, unless they deal Amaya elsewhere

    Reply
  79. Sideline Redwine

    4 years ago

    Good to see the Pads recognize the tenuous nature of their catching group.

    Before anyone anoints them WS winner, take a look back. I remember a Phillies rotation that had no weaknesses, and everyone was ready to mail them the trophy prior to the season. They did not even make the WS. Still gotta play the games…

    1
    Reply
  80. LarryJ4

    4 years ago

    All this to catch the Dodgers? Really this is the becoming of the Padres downfall imo. Gut the farm system just for a few years!!! Year 4 back to bottom of the barrel Padres again. I’m a fan of neither team. I’m a fan of the Braves and the way they’ve build is for a long haul. Like the idea of not gutting the farm and building from within. There’s a reason teams move good players when they do. Flags start to rise.

    Reply
    • skip 2

      4 years ago

      I don’t think they are trying to catch the Dodgers just trying to field the best team possible. They still can land Darvish and have the 7th to 10th best farm system!

      Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      LarryJ4, The Padres are creating a smaller window for themselves in a bid to catch two teams that still have more talent (and wider windows). I don’t get that strategy. As you indicated, teams like the Braves and Dodgers are built for the long haul. Even if the Padres add Darvish on top of Snell, the Dodgers and Braves still have better rotations, more overall talent, and better organizational depth and player development. The Padres are pushing away from them, not toward them.

      Reply
      • Hard to walk with four balls

        4 years ago

        Then they signed Manny you should have know exactly how long that window was going to be open. This was not a surprise move by them.

        Reply
    • lambeau gang

      4 years ago

      How exactly is building the major’s most expensive underachievement of a bullpen “building for the long haul?”

      Reply
  81. bobtillman

    4 years ago

    The notion of a HUGE revenue team like the Cubs “tearing it down to the studs” makes me want to puke.

    2
    Reply
  82. Logjammer D"Baggagecling

    4 years ago

    Other than Campsuano who else would go to the cubs? They need at least 2 more and 4 more if Contreras is included. And 6 for 2 isn’t out of the question.

    Reply
    • libertyfighter

      4 years ago

      The Cubs are not getting a lot of top prospects for Darvish because he also comes with $62 million owed. I think Campy and other prospects go to Chicago because Contreras is included. Myers probably also goes to Chicago to offset Darvish salary hit.

      Reply
      • Marty McRae

        4 years ago

        Darvish isn’t overpaid though. He’s worth that money, it doesn’t effect the trade because he’s still an elite player.

        Reply
        • libertyfighter

          4 years ago

          The Padres need the offset to make this deal work. Perhaps Davies is included

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          No. If you acquire a TOR arm on a short deal, you do not also get to send out money on the backend. Man. Some Padre fans here are delusional

          1
          Reply
        • Herc33

          4 years ago

          Thats entirely dependent on the haul of prospects that the Cubs get back. If they eat some salary and make Yu cheaper they can increase the return.

          Reply
        • 99socalfrc

          4 years ago

          If he is worth the money then why is Chicago trading him?

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          To re-stock the farm system. It’s the same reason why other star players get traded.

          Reply
        • 1984wasntamanual

          4 years ago

          Look at his proposal, that’s not what he was getting at. Mentioned “campy and other prospects” and only if Contreras was also going to SD.

          Reply
        • libertyfighter

          4 years ago

          Myers or Davies will be in this deal! You are delusional

          Reply
  83. MarkoRock68

    4 years ago

    Darvish has surplus value with his contract, Myers has negative value, if he is included the cost of acquisition goes up. If Contreras is included think Myers/Cronenworth/Campu/Weathers

    Reply
  84. Marty McRae

    4 years ago

    Darvish
    Clevinger
    Snell
    Limet
    Gore

    Paddack on the trade table next year?

    Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      Darvish will be 36 by then.

      Reply
  85. Robert-5

    4 years ago

    Campusano, Cronenworth, and what arms….?

    Reply
    • libertyfighter

      4 years ago

      Davies

      Reply
    • lowtalker1

      4 years ago

      Paddack altavilla Guerra losegenter

      Reply
      • lowtalker1

        4 years ago

        Scratch cronenworth and put in myers

        Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          Myers would be a bad return. Cronsworth and Campsuano and at least 1 mid level pitching prospect

          Reply
        • lowtalker1

          4 years ago

          Got to offset money if the padres are taking the full amount

          Reply
        • lowtalker1

          4 years ago

          No cronenworth, I’ll be pissed and still be wearing his jersey

          Reply
  86. Matt 18

    4 years ago

    I don’t think Davies is in a package Myers either I say possibly Weathers Campusano Lawton and Maybe Pham

    Reply
  87. clrrogers 2

    4 years ago

    Thank you to the Padres for finally getting the hot stove burning this offseason. Now that other teams don’t have as many fallback options, maybe it’ll help to encourage them to get the free agent stove going as well.

    1
    Reply
  88. lowtalker1

    4 years ago

    Still waiting here

    Reply
  89. Josip Tomic

    4 years ago

    Hello Steve
    When I pressed ‘reports’, it shows this website, baseball-reference.com/players/c/campulu01.shtml?u… instead of twitter.com/BNightengale/status/134365969320643379….

    Can you change from baseball-reference.com/players/c/campulu01.shtml?u… to twitter.com/BNightengale/status/134365969320643379….?

    “Top catching prospect Luis Campusano is among the names that has been discussed, Nightengale ‘reports’. His inclusion in the deal would give the Cubs a replacement should they send a catcher to the Padres”.

    Reply
  90. Logjammer D"Baggagecling

    4 years ago

    Anxielouslly waiting for who the return for the cubs is.

    Reply
  91. padreforlife

    4 years ago

    Scratch no one is taking Myers stop nonsense

    1
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      Why not?

      1-It’s not like he can’t play. He was #16 in MVP voting.

      2-Because his contract was so heavily backloaded, it plays well for those teams close to the payroll tax cutoff.

      3-It’s only money. Any big market team that is short on talent should be looking to add payroll in every trade. If the return for Darvish gets doubled, because the Cubs take on 100% of Myers salary, they should do so without a second thought.

      Reply
      • UnknownPoster

        4 years ago

        How about because Myers has had 60 game hot streaks in 2019, 2018 and at least 2017, yet had mediocre numbers the rest of the year and overall? He’s the definition of a streaky hitter who didn’t have time to cool down

        Reply
  92. stretch123

    4 years ago

    Padres rotation is going to be nasty.

    1
    Reply
  93. PinstripedPride

    4 years ago

    Perhaps Preller signed Kim today because he knew he would be dealing Cronenworth? Interesting, if Contreras is in the deal then I’d have to think someone like Cronenworth goes back to Chicago

    Reply
  94. Douggy44

    4 years ago

    I liked Victor….very underrated.

    Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      Yeah, he was good in 2019 when he replaced Contreras while Willson was on the IL.

      Reply
  95. Led Hoyer

    4 years ago

    Caratini going with Darvish makes a lot more sense and a little easier to swallow. Cubs have a lot of work to do considering they will now have one pitcher who can arguably throw over 100 innings on the roster.

    Reply
  96. DarkSide830

    4 years ago

    Grisham could be on the mobe

    Reply
    • Hudson6

      4 years ago

      I don’t see the Padres trading a GG CF with 5 years of control. One thing the Padres do not do if fill holes by making more.

      Reply
  97. MarlinsFanBase

    4 years ago

    The courier services in San Diego must be horrible. It’s clear that the Padres never received the memo that the Mets and Blue Jays were getting everyone in trades and free agency.

    3
    Reply
  98. bitterpadresfan

    4 years ago

    Okay, okay Cubs. We will throw in Hosmer. I don’t know what we will do without all those intangibles but we will let you have him.

    Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      We have Rizzo. Don’t want or need Hosmer

      Reply
  99. Marcus was already taken

    4 years ago

    I wonder what the money situation will be like

    Reply
  100. YourDreamGM

    4 years ago

    Cubs are about to get a huge haul. Padres need to win a championship now because they are done contending winning the best farm system trophy.

    1
    Reply
    • Edelapena08

      4 years ago

      honestly, love the win-now attitude, but i would rather have a sustained 6-7 years of high-level competition/playoff team. a Darvish signing seems like one year too early??

      Reply
    • DTDATL

      4 years ago

      This comment certainly didn’t age well

      Reply
  101. PinstripedPride

    4 years ago

    So Heyman says that it’s looking like a 4-for-2 type of deal. So if its Darvish and Caratini….. who does San Diego send back? Paddack/Davies, Cronenworth/Campusano plus two lower prospects? Maybe even Morejon?

    Reply
    • Herc33

      4 years ago

      I think a guy with some MLB pitching experience that everyone keeps forgetting about is Joey Luchessi.

      He needs a change of scenery, I’d be surprised if SD doesn’t move him at some point this off-season because he really doesn’t fit into their rotation plans. People thought he was a mid-rotation arm, but I think the reality is he’s a 5th starter type. He’s still pre-arb and has 4 years of control though, so theres still some value to a cost controlled backend LHP starter, although SD is certainly going to have to sweeten the pot elsewhere in the deal.

      2
      Reply
  102. leprechaun

    4 years ago

    Cubs ownership is a complete Joke the teams worth almost 3 billion and they only paid 850 million for them 9 years ago. Theo saw the handwriting on the wall and ran as fast as he could.

    Reply
    • ChiSoxCity

      4 years ago

      Unrealized gains. However, it wouldn’t shock me to see the Cubs sold in the near future.

      Reply
  103. Bob Smiley

    4 years ago

    my guess : Pham or Myers….plus Morejon, Weathers, Campasauno, Trammel.

    Reply
    • 99socalfrc

      4 years ago

      Trammel was traded 4 months ago………

      2
      Reply
      • Bob Smiley

        4 years ago

        yeah my bad.

        Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Trading Trammell would be very interesting considering he is a Seattle Mariner.

      1
      Reply
      • Bob Smiley

        4 years ago

        lol, forgot that.

        Reply
      • 1984wasntamanual

        4 years ago

        Trade other teams’ players, the new market inefficiency.

        1
        Reply
    • padreforlife

      4 years ago

      Another beauty Tommy Pham that’s what Cubs interested in lol

      Reply
    • Edelapena08

      4 years ago

      Morejon and Weathers in the same package- nope. sorry. Darvish not worth levering our future.

      Reply
  104. ChiSoxCity

    4 years ago

    If the Cubs start cutting payroll, there’s no point in asking for MLB ready players unless they are young “high-ceiling” type players. The best route is to demand top prospects in return for Darvish, Bryant, Contreras, and Caratini. If you can get a coat rack for Heyward, do it to free up that money. Then make a run at Lindor next season with the promise of a brief reboot/rebuild with Lindor, Baez and Hendricks as your core. The trade aspects plus draft picks and free agents could make the roster better than ever in a few short years.

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      In your scenario Baez would have to go too. He is a free agent after 2021.

      1
      Reply
      • ChiSoxCity

        4 years ago

        He would not have to. The Cubs could easily re-sign him, and add Lindor to rebuild as I stated.

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Oh well if you think the Cubs are going to have such an easy time signing Baez then they should definitely trade him! They can go one year without him, bring him back as a FA and then they’ll have Baez and prospects instead of just Baez. Which one sounds better to you?

          Reply
        • ChiSoxCity

          4 years ago

          That’s why you negotiate a deal before Baez hits the open market. Obviously you (Cubs) have to be willing to pay him what he’s worth. Otherwise, you’re trading him immediately.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          You can negotiate a deal and pay him what he’s worth even after trading him. See the Yankees with A. Chapman and the Mets with J. Familia. There is no reason the Cubs wouldn’t be able to do that.

          Reply
  105. Papabueno

    4 years ago

    Wow. SD pushing all their chips to the middle of the table. Exciting time for Padres fans.
    Dodgers better watch their six!!!

    Reply
  106. 99socalfrc

    4 years ago

    No way the Padres would give up more for Darvish than they did for Snell right? I’m thinking Campusano or Cronenworth is the headliner and 2-3 lesser prospects.

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Of course not. Snell isn’t 34 and owed $59m

      Reply
    • Edelapena08

      4 years ago

      So are we just gonna roll with Nola- who’s really only had 1-2 good years in the MLB and is on the “older” side? I could see Cronenworth more likely- especially after the Kim signing. I love how aggressive Preller is, with the win-now attitude, but Darvish just isn’t worth a farm dump.

      Reply
  107. Deleted_User

    4 years ago

    Baseball Trade Values (sue me) says Darvish and Caratini is a $25.6m surplus value.

    Reply
  108. bravesfan

    4 years ago

    I wouldn’t settle for Caratini. He’s fine and all and fills a need especially if the Cubs are asking for their best catching prospect for Yu. Unless they plan to go get JT you need a solid backstop and if a prospect clicks, it can be something special

    Reply
    • lambeau gang

      4 years ago

      I think Caratini’s inclusion is because he regularly caught Darvish in Chicago. The two already have a rapport, why break that?

      Reply
    • PinstripedPride

      4 years ago

      Nola could then stay as the primary catcher while Caratini would be a capable BUC and keep on as Darvish’s personal backstop

      Reply
  109. Philliesfan4life

    4 years ago

    While they are at it, they better give Tatis Jr his contract extension.

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Lol you say that like they are doing Tatis a favor by doing that.

      Reply
  110. lowtalker1

    4 years ago

    Crickets

    Reply
  111. Edelapena08

    4 years ago

    BETTER NOT INVOLVE GORE/WEATHERS/HASSEL….OUR FARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN DRAINED AS OF LATE. DARVISH IS NOT WORTH A FARM DUMP!

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH CAPITAL LETTERS AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

      1
      Reply
  112. Jal179

    4 years ago

    People are hating Yu way too much. I’d take his $ 60 million/ 3 year contract in a heartbeat compared to the current SP FA class.

    2
    Reply
  113. Logjammer D"Baggagecling

    4 years ago

    Any word on the return? I heard Zach Davies is a throw in player. And the Padres will end 3 or 4 more players. Could be 5 for 2 deal with Caratini going with Yu

    Reply
  114. Devlsh

    4 years ago

    For all the praise Darvish has gotten on this message board for his terrific 2020, let’s not forget that Myers had one too…. Darvish cut his ERA in half; Myers added 200+ pts to his OPS. Neither is completely real, but the fact is Myers has SOME value, even if he’s overpaid. Including him in this deal partly offsets Darvish salary, so the Cubs DO save money. I’ve seen no indication SD suddenly has Cohen/Mets money so including Myers in the deal makes sense for them too. .That the Cubs unload a 34 year old pitcher when their window looks to close rapidly after this season makes sense too. I’d bet Myers is in the deal.

    I think those people touting something like Darvish/Caratini for Myers, Campusano, Weathers and maybe an Anderson Espinoza or another back end top 30 prospect aren’t far off what this will look like.

    Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      It’s not Myers. He’s owed more than Darvish. That would be bad contract for bad contract. This is not the same. If Croenworth is in the deal and he can play LF. They’ll do that.

      1
      Reply
      • Padres2019ha

        4 years ago

        No, he’s only got 2 years left at $20 mil per.

        1
        Reply
  115. SCHWING and A Miss

    4 years ago

    Sounds all but done,hopefully Pham doesn’t bring any of that strip club covid into the clubhouse and unravel the whole plan

    Reply
  116. ab3b29

    4 years ago

    Pads putting on their big boy pants. Nice to see another team make the Dodgers sweat a little bit.

    Reply
    • SCHWING and A Miss

      4 years ago

      I doubt L.A. is worried, Padres are trying too close the gap….Dodgers will likely sign Bauer and DJ, than trade for Arenado and all those happy feelings in San Diego will be a thing of the past.

      Reply
      • Bruin1012

        4 years ago

        That will cost the Dodgers a crap ton in Money doubt even the Dodgers have anywhere near that financial might.

        1
        Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Dodgers have repeatedly shown by tossing in 10M in trades, eating large contracts and immediately DFA’ing. They have A LOT of money to throw around, if it means reducing prospect cost

          1
          Reply
        • letsplaytwo

          4 years ago

          Oh, the Dodgers do have that type of financial might. Schwing was just messin’ with ya, he knows that the Dodgers front office doesn’t make such foolish moves anymore.

          1
          Reply
  117. Rsox

    4 years ago

    Cubs are asking for “Major League experience” back in the deal. Pham or Grisham perhaps as the Cubs need Outfielders. Maybe Davies or Lucchesi. I’ll be surprised if Cronenworth is in the deal

    Reply
  118. Twinsfan79

    4 years ago

    Dodgers still best team to in that division even if this trade happens.

    1
    Reply
    • Gwynn4TheWin(field)

      4 years ago

      Yeah, everybody else might as well stop trying to improve right? . . . SMDH

      1
      Reply
      • Twinsfan79

        4 years ago

        Did I say that? Nope. Never said that. I said Dodgers still best team in that division. They will be until they are taken down. As Bruin1012 states below Snell and Darvish likely closes the gap but 60 games is not 162. LA is a very good 162 game team. While SD has greatly improved the rotation I would still bet on the Dodgers rotation every time regardless of which players the other teams in that division get. I’m glad you’re stoked, you should be. SD pulling out the stops. But until the Dodgers get beat they are the best team in that division.

        Reply
    • Bruin1012

      4 years ago

      Dodgers might still be the team to beat in that division and I emphasize might. What getting both Darvish and Snell does do it greatly closes the gap at the very least. Now the Dodgers are going to need to hit on all cylinders to win and who knows one key injury to a starter and the Pads could walk through the door in the West if they remain healthy.

      Reply
      • bkbk

        4 years ago

        I think the real piece is that even if the dodgers have more depth, that starting 5 is 90s Braves good.

        Reply
        • Orel Saxhiser

          4 years ago

          I’ll take the Dodgers’ homegrown rotation over the Padres store-bought one. Buehler, Kershaw, Urias, May, Gonsolin is championship-caliber and still improving. The Dodgers also have the pieces to trade for Castillo, which would blow these Padres moves out of the water.

          And remember this: Over the last four years, the Dodgers have played .631 ball in the regular season, gone to three World Series, and won a championship. A .631 winning percentage equates to 102-60 (.629) in a normal season. This is what they average. The Dodgers are otherwise loaded with talented young players who, for the most part, have demonstrated they can excel at the MLB level. Talented young players tend to get better.

          Again, the Dodgers average 102 wins per season and should remain at least at that level in 202`1. Do you realize how hard it is to get to that level? That is what the Padres are up against.

          Reply
        • Jal179

          4 years ago

          This is such a petty argument. Who gives a crap how a team obtains an epic starting rotation. It’s about trying to win championships and kudos to the Pads for drafting and developing well to be able to be in this position to compete toe to toe with the Dodgers, Yanks, etc.

          This type of rivalry is just awesome to see.

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          For one, it hints to a teams ability to succeed long term

          Reply
        • Bruin1012

          4 years ago

          Cey Hey you just keep telling yourself that and yes the Dodgers are an excellent team but there are threats on the horizon starting with this Padre team. Preller is creating a team that is capable of playing with and potentially outplaying the Dodgers. I’m guessing that the league is going to find out about Gore this year as well. It should be a fine shootout in the NL West this is the first real threat to the Dodgers in a long time. Don’t have a pony in this race but if I was a Dodger fan I would be a little concerned.

          Reply
      • Jal179

        4 years ago

        If Gonzolin regresses, Kershaw hits the wall and Bellinger doesn’t bounce back (all a lot of big ifs admittedly) then I’d say the Pads are right there with them. Wouldn’t surprise me one bit to see the Pads win the NL west.

        Reply
  119. pcwizblue

    4 years ago

    Braves, Padres and Dodgers will be in the playoffs for sure. I guess St Louis from the Central.
    About time the Padres get Real. All the youth League teams mostly advance to the youth league World Series for years.
    Southern California is a hot bed for baseball.

    Reply
    • Led Hoyer

      4 years ago

      Whoever gets to 70 wins

      Reply
  120. msqboxer

    4 years ago

    Looks like everything is half off at Wrigley right now…would signing Yadi Molina to handle the staff for two years be out of the question?

    2
    Reply
    • Sideline Redwine

      4 years ago

      I would love that.

      Reply
  121. bumpy93

    4 years ago

    wow small market club like the Padres are going after a big I know Snell isn’t making as much money yet but it’s coming up but Padres were a dangerous team last year and adding you darvish and Blake Snell to that already really really good young core the Padres might be a threat for the next couple years they’re doing it right

    Reply
  122. Kevin28786

    4 years ago

    Padres are going all in. They best win it, because they will be the Padres again in no time the way they’re trading away their future.

    Reply
  123. Ancient Pistol

    4 years ago

    Didn’t the Padres try something similar five+ years ago?

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Weakness #1: Thinks Preller is capable of learning from his mistakes

      Reply
  124. DarkSide830

    4 years ago

    how

    Reply
  125. Rumors2godsears

    4 years ago

    Has anyone poked Jerry Dipoto to see if he’s doing ok? All these trades and he is almost non existent.

    Reply
    • letsplaytwo

      4 years ago

      Leave Dipoto alone – he has done a fine job building up what Jack Z ruined in his time in Seattle.

      Reply
  126. brewermayne

    4 years ago

    Zach Davies will be apart of this package.

    Reply
    • UnknownPoster

      4 years ago

      Why would the Cubs want a pitcher who walks next year, when they clearly are blowing it up AND cuts out 1/3 of their Darvish savings?

      Stop thinking how you want the trade to look, and consider the needs of the other team

      Reply
      • dan55

        4 years ago

        Well, this is a bad comment @Laughing@You

        Reply
    • Sideline Redwine

      4 years ago

      Will he be “apart” or “a part”? Rather important distinction. (Sometimes the grammar police has a point…

      Reply
      • SalaryCapMyth

        4 years ago

        @Redwine- Speaking of grammar issues, would you care to have another look at your last sentence? =D

        Reply
  127. Logjammer D"Baggagecling

    4 years ago

    Wtf why isn’t Campsuano part of the deal? Cubs getting robbed

    Reply
    • PinstripedPride

      4 years ago

      That depends on who else in the deal. Besides, Darvish was always going to be partly salary dumped because Chicago wants to save money for other things.

      Reply
  128. padres2024champs

    4 years ago

    Darvish & Caratini for

    Davies, Hudson Head, Blake Hunt, and Lucchesi

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Cubs have no use for Davies because he’s a rental

      Reply
      • PinstripedPride

        4 years ago

        Perhaps Paddack or Lucchesi will be shipped out instead

        1
        Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Is that a good deal? What about Robert Hassell III? He was supposed to be part of the deal.

      Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Blake Hunt went to TB in the Blake Snell deal.

      1
      Reply
      • padres2024champs

        4 years ago

        Darvish & Caratini for

        Davies, Hudson Head, Owen Caissie, and Lucchesi

        Reply
    • David Herrick

      4 years ago

      Blake Hunt was dealt to Tampa Bay.

      Davies, Lucchesi, Head, Hassell, and Weathers.

      Reply
      • padres2024champs

        4 years ago

        Hassell and Weathers too much, I’d say someone more the likes of Owen Caissie

        Reply
  129. whyhayzee

    4 years ago

    8:12 PM – the deal is a little closer to being done.
    9:42 PM – the deal is even closer to being done.
    10:32 PM – the deal is really close to being done.
    11:27 PM – the deal is really really close to being done.
    April 14, 2021 – details are almost final.

    1
    Reply
  130. Herc33

    4 years ago

    Jonathan Mayo just tweeted that it’s Davies and Owen Cassie plus more prospects. That’s a good early indicator for SD I believe, but who knows until we know all the names

    Reply
    • Led Hoyer

      4 years ago

      I sure hope those aren’t the headliners. Davies makes zero sense.

      Reply
  131. Bruin1012

    4 years ago

    There is no doubt that Darvish at his 21 million per year has excess value.

    The real question is how front offices look at prospects. After all prospects are just that prospects.

    Reply
  132. Dixon Miaz

    4 years ago

    The question still remains. Has Zach Davies hit puberty yet?

    Reply
  133. Rangers29

    4 years ago

    Zach Davies is a really, really good return.

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      No he’s a rental and the Cubs are rebuliding. Rebuilding teams don’t trade for rentals. They trade them away.

      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Its not a full on rebuild though.

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Yes it is.

          Reply
      • UnknownPoster

        4 years ago

        All I can think is they are planning to trade Davies and believe that can negotiate a better deal than having Preller trade Davies for specific talent

        I agree. He makes no sense to be on the Cubs in 2021

        Reply
    • Cam

      4 years ago

      I can see Davies being flipped onwards by the Cubs.

      1
      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Probably for cash. I dont know how much he’s owed though.

        Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        They wouldn’t get as much for him when he only has three months of control left as opposed to a full year. They aren’t exactly buying low on him.

        Reply
  134. Cam

    4 years ago

    Why on earth is Preller gutting the farm to have a 2-3 year window of success? The best thing he did was put together a very, very good team while maintaining a great pipeline of talent. The Padres were set up to be able to compete short and long term – which is a rare position to be in. Last time he threw his chips in, he got burned – badly. Has he not learned that lesson?

    As a Dodgers fan, I was worried and excited about a Padres team competing long term. Now, they’re boom or bust.

    1
    Reply
    • padres2024champs

      4 years ago

      Early indication is that they are still retaining Gore, Abrams, Campusano, Hassell, and Weathers, their top 5 prospects. Wouldn’t say he’s gutting the system.

      4
      Reply
      • Cam

        4 years ago

        While they are good hands to hold onto, beyond Gore that top 5 is looking much more league average (although I think Abrams is a real gem). Gutting would be more about the massive drop off after that. Suddenly, there’s not a whole lot in the pipeline if the top few guys bust. It’s essentially gambling on the current roster, a few blue chippers and not much else.

        Hey, it’s gutsy..I can’t say Preller doesn’t have a set of brass balls. But man, it blew up in his face last time..and he’s gambling again despite probably not needing to.

        Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Kinda BS they kept Hassell since he was rumored about an hour ago.

        Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      Cam, exactly. Meanwhile, the Dodgers have a wide window and a ton of talent throughout the organization. Over the last four years, the Dodgers have played .631 ball in the regular season, gone to three World Series, and won a championship. A .631 win percentage equates to 102-60 (.629) in a normal season. And they are loaded with young players who are still improving. That is what the Padres are chasing. People need to understand how difficult it is to win 102 games, which, again, is what this still-young Dodgers team averages. We’ve yet to see how the “new” Padres will hold up over a full(er) season.

      I think Preller is overplaying his hand here. At the end of the day, the main NL threat to the Dodgers is still the Braves. People are forgetting the 2020 Braves were without Soroka and how good he is. The Dodgers and Braves should be bumping heads as the league’s top two teams for several years. The Padres? I think they’ll regret giving away the store for a quick fix that still leaves them short of the two teams they are chasing.

      1
      Reply
  135. Jal179

    4 years ago

    Cassie, Davies is sweet FA for the Pads to pay for Yu. If this is in fact true than the Pads get an A+ on this deal.

    Pads loading up is great for baseball. This is going to be an epic NL West battle.

    Reply
  136. AUTiger7222

    4 years ago

    How the crap do the Padres keep making all these major trades without giving up any of their elite prospects. Is A.J. Peller just that much smarter than everyone else or does he put them under some kind of strange spell?

    1
    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      They did give up an elite prospect in the Snell trade (Patiño) and Darvish was never going to fetch an elite prospect with his age and salary and 2020 being his only good year in the past 3.

      Reply
  137. NuckBobFutting

    4 years ago

    Cubs get: Zach Davies, Reginald Preciado, Owen Caissie, Ismael Mena, Yeison Santana

    Padres get: Yu Darvish, Victor Caratini

    1
    Reply
    • UnknownPoster

      4 years ago

      I’ll take the over on that package

      Reply
      • I Beg To Differ

        4 years ago

        Turns out that was the exact package according to reports.

        Hopefully you didn’t place any money on Darvish bringing back more than Snell, cause he didn’t.

        Reply
      • wordonthestreet

        4 years ago

        @ Laughing@you

        Well if you took the over then we are all laughing at you!

        Reply
    • Marcus was already taken

      4 years ago

      A pretty good deal. I like it

      Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      That’s not good at all for the Cubs and Jed’s throwing Caratini in, too.

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        What were you expecting for a guy who Cubs fans were pleading for him to opt out of his contract a year ago?

        Reply
  138. fatelfunnel

    4 years ago

    Zach Davies, shortstop Reginald Preciado, outfielder Owen Caissie plus one more prospect going to the Cubs.

    Reply
    • fatelfunnel

      4 years ago

      Sorry two other prospects..Yeison Santana and Ismael Mena

      Reply
  139. Logjammer D"Baggagecling

    4 years ago

    So Reginald Preciado is probably really young but he’s a SS, does this affect Ed Howard IV?

    Reply
  140. whosehighpitch

    4 years ago

    San Diego all in for 2021. What happens when they don’t win it all and have to sell off next year? They start by sending Machado and others to the Mets who immediately become the 2021 off season “winners”

    Reply
    • Herc33

      4 years ago

      Everyone important on SD is locked up through 2022, and a good chunk of them through 2023. They’ll have years before selling off.

      These prospects are all like 18 years old, they’re not cracking big league rosters for like 3 years anyways.

      Reply
  141. bobtillman

    4 years ago

    As Johnny Sain (forgive me for being old) once said, “Show me the baby; I don’t want t hear about the labor pains”.

    Just report the trade already……

    Reply
  142. Deleted_User

    4 years ago

    If the package as reported is the real package, this appears to be a win for SD. Lot more quantity than quality. Padres better hope that the Darvish of the last 17 months is the real Darvish tho.

    Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      It’s a risk for the Padres. A team that has yet to show they can win 90 chasing a still-improving team that averages 102. Good day to be a Cardinals fan, though. Favorites in that woeful division for the foreseeable future. They just need to make the kinds of moves that will benefit them in October. These can be made either in the winter or at the July deadline.

      Reply
  143. jide

    4 years ago

    What a salary dump

    Reply
  144. I Beg To Differ

    4 years ago

    1 year of Davies, Caissie, Preciado, Mena, and Santana

    Well what do you know. Darvish got a worse package than Snell did.

    Cubs didn’t get anywhere close to top prospects for Darvish. They just shed salary.

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      What were you expecting for a guy who Cubs fans were pleading for him to opt out of his contract a year ago?

      1
      Reply
    • dan55

      4 years ago

      Darvish was never getting close to Snell’s package. He costs more, and he’s a lot older. All things considered, I think this was a decent return for the Cubs. I think this is a fair trade for both sides.

      Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      So the players they got back are garbage is what you’re saying?

      Reply
      • Hudson6

        4 years ago

        Preiado and Mena in particular both have huge talent. They are both tall, long extremely talented players from Latin America who have never played an inning in the U.S. minor leagues. They are both very similar to Fernando Tatis when the Padres first got him.

        Reply
  145. David Herrick

    4 years ago

    The Cubs trade Yu Darvish and get zero pitching prospects back. That is a failure!! I like some of the hitting prospects, but they received four offensive players – Caissie, Santana, Mena, and Preciado – that are at least a half decade away from Wrigley. They have very few legitimate starting pitching prospects in the system, and they receive ZERO from the Padres. Not even Lange? Terrible trade!!

    Reply
  146. Priggs89

    4 years ago

    There’s some longterm upside in this package for the Cubs, but the fact that they went with 4 prospects that have never played above Rookie ball tells you all you need to know about how they view their team. They’re already looking towards that next window 4+ years down the road. More deals are coming.

    1
    Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      The Cardinals are the only team that is truly competing in that division. It’ll be interesting to see how they fill out their roster.

      Reply
  147. kershawsgrandma22

    4 years ago

    Yu has had one sub 3.0 ERA since 2013 and it was during a short season. No big deal

    Reply
  148. SadRedsFan

    4 years ago

    I was looking forward to the Reds competing. They should’ve traded Gray or Castillo for a similar deal instead.

    Well, either way it looks like another 5 years of losing.

    Reply
« Older Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Joc Pederson Suffers Right Hand Fracture

    Recent

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    Brewers Claim Drew Avans

    White Sox Sign Tyler Alexander, Place Jared Shuster On 15-Day IL

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    Diamondbacks Select Kyle Backhus, Designate Aramis Garcia

    Athletics Acquire Austin Wynns

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version