Headlines

  • Red Sox To Promote Roman Anthony
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment
  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Giants Sign Alex Cobb

By Anthony Franco | December 1, 2021 at 7:09am CDT

The Giants have continued to build their rotation by signing right-hander Alex Cobb.  The Beverly Hills Sports Council client signed a two-year contract worth $20MM in guaranteed money, and Cobb is set to earn $9MM in each of the 2022 and 2023 seasons.  San Francisco also holds a $10MM club option on Cobb for 2024, with a $2MM buyout.

Cobb spent the 2021 campaign in Orange County, after the Angels acquired him from the Orioles last winter. It was an eyebrow-raising move at the time, since Cobb had struggled with both injuries and underperformance over his three seasons in Baltimore. The ten-year big league veteran rewarded the organization’s faith, though, tossing 93 1/3 innings of 3.76 ERA/3.83 SIERA ball across 18 starts.

Along the way, Cobb generated more whiffs than he ever had before. His 11.2% swinging strike rate and 24.9% strikeout percentage were both career-best marks, each checking in a touch above the respective league averages for starting pitchers. Cobb paired that uptick in whiffs with his typically robust ground-ball tendencies (53.3%) and solid control (8.4% walk rate) en route to a nice season.

Cobb’s run prevention numbers were partially propped up by one of the league’s lowest home run rates (0.48 per nine innings). It’s unlikely he’ll continue to be quite that successful keeping the ball in the yard moving forward. But Cobb’s blend of average or better whiffs, control and grounders should allow him to be a solid back-of-the-rotation option even if his homer rate regresses. The bigger concern might lie in his health, as he had separate injured list stints this past season due to blisters and right wrist inflammation. Cobb didn’t seem any worse for wear after returning from his time on the IL, though, with the velocity on all of his offerings remaining intact during his final few outings of the year.

The Giants entered the offseason known to be targeting rotation help. Only Logan Webb remained under club control from the team’s primary five this past season. They’ve already re-signed Anthony DeSclafani and reportedly were nearing agreement to bring Alex Wood back. Kevin Gausman’s departure to the Blue Jays leaves one prominent vacancy, though, and teams often have to rely on seven or eight starters to navigate the injury attrition of a full season.

There’s still room for further additions to the rotation, and there should be plenty of spending capacity with which to do so. Cobb’s two-year, $20MM guarantee narrowly tops MLBTR’s two-year, $16MM forecast entering the winter.

The Giants now have a little more than $113MM in estimated 2022 commitments, according to Jason Martinez of Roster Resource. For a franchise that has logged player payrolls in the $200MM range in the past, a fairly modest Cobb signing shouldn’t be especially prohibitive to the club’s future goals.

Jon Heyman of the MLB Network (Twitter link) first reported that the deal was being finalized, and Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle reported the club was making a strong run at the right-hander last week.  The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal (via Twitter) reported the $20MM figure, NBC Sports Bay Area’s Alex Pavlovic (Twitter link) reported the existence of the option year, and USA Today’s Bob Nightengale tweeted the salary breakdown.

Image courtesy of USA Today Sports.

Share 0 Retweet 12 Send via email0

Newsstand San Francisco Giants Transactions Alex Cobb

Cubs To Sign Clint Frazier
Main
Blue Jays Sign Kevin Gausman
View Comments (244)
Post a Comment

244 Comments

  1. Melvin McMurf

    4 years ago

    good luck with that

    6
    Reply
    • Tacoshells

      4 years ago

      Giants don’t need luck. They have a decent track record of making pitchers better and turning their career around. Gausman just got 110 million and was DFAed just 2 years prior.

      39
      Reply
      • Noel1982

        4 years ago

        Gausman was 28 when they got ahold of him cobb will be 35 when the season starts

        22
        Reply
        • BeansforJesus

          4 years ago

          Gausman also had the peripherals to justify the investment. Cobb, not so much.

          Although, Cobb did have a significant decrease in launch angle, so maybe the giants want to develop that aspect.

          Reply
        • Noel1982

          4 years ago

          How often does something happen like that for guys turning 35 when a season starts ? Rich hill though not exactly apples to apples ?

          2
          Reply
        • David

          4 years ago

          Cobb won’t be 35 until after the 2022 season concludes.

          3
          Reply
        • EBJ

          4 years ago

          Since his birthday is in early October, likely he makes a few post-season starts for the Giants as a 35-year-old.

          2
          Reply
        • JackBurton

          4 years ago

          If Alex Cobb is starting postseason games for the Giants next year, then I’ll be a happy Giants camper.

          3
          Reply
      • User 2079935927

        4 years ago

        Name a few

        Reply
        • BeansforJesus

          4 years ago

          Name a few of the peripherals that justify the Gausman contract?
          Over 32% k% 2020
          Sub 7 % bb rate 2020
          Above average spin rate and velocity on his fastball
          Also if you review his pitch tracking, post 2019 Gausman did much better job keeping his pitches down and missed closer to the zone.

          If that question wasn’t for me, then disregard.

          4
          Reply
        • sanfranb27

          4 years ago

          That was mostly as a reliever, correct?

          Reply
      • usafcop

        4 years ago

        Giants are the luckiest team in all team sports.

        What are you talking about?

        Watch Cobb go 16-7 with an ERA under 3.00 with 200 K’s.

        Kidding but wouldn’t doubt it with the Giants luck.

        2
        Reply
        • dubtastic

          4 years ago

          Daamnnnn, they must be hella lucky to win 107 wins last year..that’s some true luck!

          4
          Reply
        • usafcop

          4 years ago

          @dubtastic

          The Giants were lucky that the Padres lost 3/5 of their rotation. Guys equally as talented as Gausman. In addition to p lol aging without mega-star Tatis for a stretch.

          The Giants are lucky that the Dodgers were without 2 Cy young pitchers and 2 MVP caliber players for a stretch. In addition to losing May.

          The Giants are lucky that all of their 34-35 year old players that were considered done just 2 seasons ago (the last full season) all bounces back and had career type years.

          The Giants were lucky to get #1 and #2 production out of 2 career #4 starters.

          So yeah they had a ton of luck this past season. They lucked out by having backups equally as good as their starters.

          The Braves lost Acuna who is better than any 2 or 3 Giants combined. That’s a huge loss.

          They are the luckiest franchise in all of team sports. They were the underdog in each series in each season they won the WS and faced elimination a few times.

          They got lucky bloop hits or home runs from some of the most unlikely heroes and won 3 WS titles with the worst lineups of all of the playoff teams in the playoffs all 3 years.

          Look this up: worst lineups to win a WS. The 3 Giants teams in 2010, 2012, 2014 are all in the top 10.

          Some say they won with pitching but the Phillies back then had equal pitching with Halladay and Hamels and Lee and Oswalt plus a much better lineup with MVP caliber hitters batting 1-4.

          The Giants were lucky then and they were lucky this past season but their luck ran out in the playoffs.

          No way do they come close to even 92 wins in 2022. Add that to the fact they have been a bottom 10 team the last few years and you have a 2021 anomaly type season from them.

          They weren’t good the past few seasons and they won’t be good in 2022. Therefore it was a ton of luck that led to their 2021 success.

          Reply
        • usafcop

          4 years ago

          1st paragraph I meant: in addition to playing without Tatis.

          Reply
        • hopper15

          4 years ago

          @usafcop That was one of the most ridiculous posts I’ve ever seen and that’s saying something.

          1
          Reply
        • SFGiants4ever

          4 years ago

          There are sayings that begin with “even a fool ….” in this case apparently this fool can’t comprehend that everything you just said stops being “lucky” and skill as well experience and planning leads to having a great bench, great pitching, good/great draft picks. Then those things lead to winning divisions, Wild Cards, 3 World Series Championships, 107 games in a season etc. You don’t get “lucky” to accomplish all that. Your ignorance and jealousy are showing fool.

          Reply
        • usafcop

          4 years ago

          Oh but yes it even takes luck for a 15-1 team to win the SB.

          It takes luck for a 70-12 team in the NBA to win the ship.

          It takes luck for an MLB team with 105 wins to win the WS.

          To win the ship in any major sport a ton of luck is needed even from the best teams and I mean the most stacked teams like the Astros and Dodgers in the MLB. Not the Giants who had the most wins.

          They had the best record but they weren’t the best team in baseball. They were barely top 12 in talent. So yes it took a ton of luck for them to win 107 games while far superior teams won far less.

          My point was that it takes luck even from the elite teams to win it all. The Giants are far from elite. They had one good season the last 5 years. While other teams lost Cy young candidates and MVP caliber hitters.

          They had a great season. But don’t make it more than it was. An anomaly type season. This isn’t a dynasty nor was their 3 WS titles with 2 seasons in between where they missed the playoffs entirely. Therefore it was not a dynasty. Nor is this the start of one.

          Not jealous or ignorant or foolish to think this. Teams get lucky all the time. The Giants just seem to get lucky far more than other franchises across all sports.

          Reply
        • usafcop

          4 years ago

          @SFGiants4ever

          So Lincecum Cain and a young MadBum and a weak lineup was better than Halladay and Lee and Hamels and Oswalt and Rollins and Utley and Howard and Rolen and Victorino?

          Just checking what you think. I know the answer. Hell even the Reds were better. We know the Dodgers were and the Rangers and the Tigers.

          Talent wise the Giants should have 0 rings. They overcame the odds each season and were facing elimination multiple times. They weren’t even the best team in their own division much less the entire league.

          They had so much luck going their way it wasn’t even funny. They came back against the Reds and the Phillies in the same playoffs. Both teams were better than the Giants.

          It takes luck in any sport to win it all. The Astros and Dodgers are absolutely stacked and have 2 WS rings between them over the last several seasons.

          It absolutely telescopes luck to win a ship on any sport even by the elite teams and the Giants are FAR from elite. They are a scrappy team that gets lucky in the dumpster dive Olympics.

          This isn’t jealousy. It’s the hard truth. Face it the Giants are good for 86-88 wins at best next season. You know I am right.

          Reply
      • WAR_OVERRATED

        4 years ago

        Ie. Barry William Zito?

        Reply
      • sleepyfloyd

        4 years ago

        Of course the need luck, rebuilding a staff every season via FA + dumpster dices can work but it’s not a guaranteed recipe to keep working, socially taking into account guys with some wear and tear. Giants won’t win 90 games this season.

        1
        Reply
      • carllafong

        4 years ago

        Cobb doesn’t need to be turned around. He had an excellent year and was the second best pitcher on the Angels next to Ohtani. The problem is he’s always hurt. He didn’t even pitch 100 innings. He has constant blister issues. The Angels wanted him back, but not for two years and an option year. I’m not rooting against him, but this contract is really a stretch and there are better options.

        Reply
    • TonyGwynnSD19

      4 years ago

      Indeed. Alex Cobb is an injury prone mediocre number 4 guy

      13
      Reply
      • foppert

        4 years ago

        Perfect !

        Reply
      • i like al conin

        4 years ago

        Someone has to be the no. 4

        13
        Reply
      • Giants74

        4 years ago

        @tonygwynn You do realize the new San Diego pitching coach came from San Francisco. So, the Padres are copying the Giants.

        7
        Reply
        • Bobby Czyz

          4 years ago

          The new HITTING coach is from the Giant’s organization.

          7
          Reply
      • RobM

        4 years ago

        The Giants will make him a #2 guy who will go on to sign a $100M contract while the Padres will continue to figure out why they can’t develop or acquire consistent and healthy pitching.

        4
        Reply
      • ltully789

        4 years ago

        Fortunately that’s all the Giants need to beat the pathetic Padres.

        1
        Reply
      • The truth hurts

        4 years ago

        Baseball is full of mediocre pitchers and hitters.

        Reply
      • Mick10

        4 years ago

        That’s all they need. Webb is the ACE. Disco will be the 2. Maybe they get another guy (Stroman?). Wood is a solid 3.

        1
        Reply
        • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

          4 years ago

          If it were anyone other than the Giants(maybe Rays too) and Zaidi I would disagree. Since it’s Zaidi and the Giants, I agree. With those 3, and then pick up another guy, I feel like Stroman would fit nicely(since he could really be the number 1 or 2. I include 1 as a possibility just in case Webb isn’t totally ready to front a pitchint staff

          2
          Reply
        • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

          4 years ago

          Sorry, accidentally posted before I was finished.

          …pitching staff. While Webb looked amazing this season, I can’t help but remember his play leading into his amazing stretch, where he struggled a lot.

          1
          Reply
        • sanfranb27

          4 years ago

          I think Webb took the reigns of the ACE out of Gausman’s hands when he faltered down the stretch. Webb stayed strong and came through for the Giants when they needed him too. Gausman folded in the second half. But not bad for a guy that had been coming out of the bullpen for a few a while.

          Reply
        • sanfranb27

          4 years ago

          With the exception of March and April, Webb was lights out. When exactly did he “struggle a lot”?

          1
          Reply
        • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

          4 years ago

          @sanfranb27

          Webb struggled before his stretch of dominance. In 2019 he had a 5.22 ERA and in 2020 he had a 5.47 ERA

          1
          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          4 years ago

          sanfranb27:

          You must not have watched Webb pitch until this year. For me, in 2019-20, he was the source of much frustration. He pitched himself into poor leverage situations all the time. A typical AB for Webb was 0-2, then 3 easy takes that resulted in either a walk, or a 3-2 pitch that found too much plate and got hard hit. In 2021 he started figuring things out.

          Reply
        • goldenstatelaw

          4 years ago

          I’m a life long giants fan. But if Wood is a 3, the season will be a problem.

          1
          Reply
        • goldenstatelaw

          4 years ago

          Disco as a 2? Come on man. They need a 2 now either by trade or Stroman or Rodon. And Beede needs to show the hell up.

          2
          Reply
        • goldenstatelaw

          4 years ago

          Webb, Stroman/Rodon/trade, Disco, and then 4/5 covered by wood and cobb with Beede pushing them could work. But they need a 2 and maybe even kikuchi

          Reply
        • sleepyfloyd

          4 years ago

          Lol Beede is 28 years old how long are you waiting for him to “show up”

          Reply
        • carllafong

          4 years ago

          He didn’t even pitch 100 innings! Cobb is now a year older and with more mileage. If you get 100 innings out him I think you’ll be fortunate. Maybe that’s all the Giants want him for, but two years with an option was a bridge too far for the Angels– and they need pitching, like Cobb and the job he did, and know him best.

          Reply
    • User 355748524

      4 years ago

      Cobb has found himself often sidelined due to injuries, so track record or not, good luck with that.

      6
      Reply
      • sanfranb27

        4 years ago

        So do deGrom and Kershaw. Lol

        3
        Reply
        • carllafong

          4 years ago

          Sure, Cobb is right there with deGrom and Kershaw. Which one of three will be missing at the Hall of Fame induction ceremony?

          Reply
      • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

        4 years ago

        Wood is often hurt

        Reply
    • bloomquist4hof

      4 years ago

      Have they reported the numbers yet? I’m going to hold judgment.

      3
      Reply
    • Dbacks44

      4 years ago

      Absolutely Brillant move. Bet you anything he has a better record then Gausman. People don’t understand that the ballpark means so much. There’s a reason people do well in Oakland and San Fran.Then when they leave they get worse.

      if cobb stays healthy he will win 15 games with a 3.3 era

      Reply
      • scottn59c

        4 years ago

        Hope so! But don’t forget that he’ll play half his games elsewhere. Coors Field is death on Giants pitchers.

        Reply
      • carllafong

        4 years ago

        Gausman threw 192 innings. Cobb threw a whopping 93 innings over 18 starts– that’s for the entire season.

        1
        Reply
  2. TonyGwynnSD19

    4 years ago

    The San Francisco Giants. LOL

    5
    Reply
    • dandan

      4 years ago

      Haha..?

      5
      Reply
    • D-Lew

      4 years ago

      San Diego sports fans ? A truly classic oxymoron…

      9
      Reply
      • ltully789

        4 years ago

        Minus the “oxy”

        1
        Reply
    • SKx1

      4 years ago

      Madre fans will be Madre fans lmao. This is literally a 0 risk signing. Just like last year with Wood and Disco.

      10
      Reply
      • DarkSide830

        4 years ago

        “Madre”? wow, creative and classy insult…

        2
        Reply
    • IROC

      4 years ago

      When was the last time the Padres won the World Series? How many have they won? Padres are a dynasty.

      3
      Reply
  3. angt222

    4 years ago

    Finally. Guess SF circled back to Cobb after Gausman signed with Toronto.

    5
    Reply
    • Pete'sView

      4 years ago

      Like the two pitchers are at the same level.

      7
      Reply
      • SFGiants4ever

        4 years ago

        Pete, definitely a downgrade (obviously) I really don’t understand this signing at all, this isn’t like signing Wood who had a history of being a solid pitcher, this makes very little sense, I think a desperation move honestly. Hopefully Webb, Disco, and Wood provide solid numbers again.

        3
        Reply
        • Gmen777

          4 years ago

          I don’t know the details but i feel very safe saying this isn;t a desperation move. Giants are so ahead of their timeline they have no reason to be desperate

          6
          Reply
        • solaris602

          4 years ago

          Was the Wood signing ever made official?

          1
          Reply
        • Gmen777

          4 years ago

          I saw something on Giants Twitter feed about him going for his physical and after that it should be finalized.

          1
          Reply
    • HalosHeavenJJ

      4 years ago

      Probably. Two plans in place at the same time. Gausman was top priority. If not, Cobb then add a second player with the money not spent on Gausman.

      3
      Reply
      • angt222

        4 years ago

        Exactly.

        1
        Reply
      • 5TUNT1N

        4 years ago

        Yup from Alex pavlovic saw it as well said the wood deal should be finalized soon.

        Reply
      • tstats

        4 years ago

        Don’t use logic, just overreact

        1
        Reply
  4. phantomofdb

    4 years ago

    Yo twins, are you awake?? You don’t even have a rotation for next year… and pitchers are flying off the board

    Reply
    • IjustloveBaseball

      4 years ago

      Have to assume they’ll go hard after Stroman at this point — but so will a few other teams. Still some other help out there, but ya wow, arms are flying off the board!

      1
      Reply
  5. Noel1982

    4 years ago

    He’s 35 when the season starts and he has to be managed if he is the cueto replacement that’s a upgrade if he’s taking gausman spot this will be a rare farhan fail !

    Reply
    • Baseball 1600

      4 years ago

      Theres no chance he’s taking Gausmans spot

      6
      Reply
      • Gmen777

        4 years ago

        My guess is for now tentative rotation is Webb-Disco-Wood-Cobb-Cheap vet/Hjelle/another minor leaguer. Not pretty but at this point i trust Zaidi

        3
        Reply
    • Ry.the.Stunner

      4 years ago

      He’s 34 when the season starts.

      2
      Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      4 years ago

      He is not 35 when the season starts. He just turned 34 last month. 2021 will be his age 34 season.

      1
      Reply
  6. giant4life

    4 years ago

    I recently bought a dog and missed a golden opportunity to name him Farhan. That is really what Farhan is, a dog hangin by the table with the real GM’s but content to wait for the scraps that fall his way. He is the dude at the bar that waits until 2:00 a.m. and takes home whatever chick is still around. Keep slummin it Fraudhan!

    1
    Reply
    • Pete'sView

      4 years ago

      As always, you are negative about the Giants. Why bother? We’ve heard your trashing over and over again. Try something fact based.

      14
      Reply
    • phantomofdb

      4 years ago

      Giants have signed several players already this off-season. You may not love all the guys they sign but they aren’t just sitting there waiting for the scraps. You’re describing the twins. They just sit around and wait until the end to sign JA happ shoemaker and Colome

      3
      Reply
      • Noel1982

        4 years ago

        They are the SAme team full of older guys many due for regression but they replaced for now posey with Bart and casila or whatever his name is and Bryant with slater and Estrada! And so far 30 year old gausman with soon to be 35 year old Alex Cobb ! Wood and disco retained where also more healthy then their usual standards! Right now giants are probably a slight under 500

        Reply
        • giant4life

          4 years ago

          I am negative towards Farhan not the Giants and all I do is give you facts. All I heard for 3 years was how FZ would finally open up the purse strings once all the bad contracts clear. Not only has he not done that, he has given some of those old contracts extensions!! It doesn’t get any easier than free agent acquisitions all you have to do is pay them. The Giants have the money and are in better financial shape than ever but Farhan refuses to pull the trigger. That money they aren’t spending isn’t going back in your pocket bud

          2
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          That money they aren’t spending isn’t going back in your pocket bud
          ==============================
          I got news for you, bud, Farhan doesn’t own the team, you nimrod.

          6
          Reply
        • giant4life

          4 years ago

          There are a lot of people who own the Giants and they are getting richer because their puppet Farhan isn’t spending any real money. Prices haven’t gone down any since Farhan cut the payroll by $100 milllion so he gets a pat on his head from the owners for that

          2
          Reply
        • Ernie Riles

          4 years ago

          Negative on Farhan? They won 107 games. He’ll spend that extra 40 million, be patient.

          6
          Reply
        • giant4life

          4 years ago

          There will soon be nobody left to spend that 40 million on which will become a convenient excuse during his next interview on knbr when he slips in a “you know” every other word in every damn sentence. I thought this guy was smart… you know?!?

          1
          Reply
        • TheWomanWithTheGlassEye

          4 years ago

          Zaidi’s job is to build the roster. You don’t do that by spending whatever. Who’s to day he hasn’t tried to sign players? He isn’t gonna overspend on guys, plain and simple. Let the other teams do that and get stuck with bad contracts. He will pay fair value for talent and also bring in players from the scrap heap and try to turn them around.

          2
          Reply
        • ABStract

          4 years ago

          @giantsfakefan
          If the Giants followed your advice they’d be the Padres, a bunch of expensive unproductive losers.
          Smart people don’t spend just to spend ya idiot!
          Everything you say sounds spoiled as hell.

          2
          Reply
    • gmenfan

      4 years ago

      I see TonyGwynnSD19 got a burner account.

      13
      Reply
    • Giants74

      4 years ago

      Why sign a bunch of FAs to long-term deals when your Farm system is ready to produce?

      5
      Reply
      • sleepyfloyd

        4 years ago

        What exactly gave they produced outside of Webb and a reliever?

        Reply
      • sleepyfloyd

        4 years ago

        What exactly gave they produced in a decade outside of Webb and a few relievers?

        Reply
    • RadioPirate

      4 years ago

      Farhan seemed content to wait for the scraps to fall his way last year, too. How’d that work out? And, judging from the depth of the takes here, I suspect most of you are too young to remember that the 2010 World Champs were basically built from the scrap heap. Real baseball fans–real fans of any sport, in fact–know you don’t win pennants in the offseason.

      1
      Reply
    • ltully789

      4 years ago

      Was it always your goal in life to be a witless troll? If so, congrats on achieving your lifelong dream.

      1
      Reply
    • Kapler's Coconut Oil

      4 years ago

      To everybody that’s commenting…why? It’s clear this dude is here to troll instead of spur critical analysis of Farhan’s moves or lack thereof. Everyone is better off muting this guy. I know I will as soon as I hit Publish.

      1
      Reply
      • Jean Matrac

        4 years ago

        Spot on. He only trolls Giants articles. The fact that he never comments on Padre articles ought to tell people something.

        1
        Reply
        • claude raymond

          4 years ago

          So tad and kcOil, buster Olney was on knbr today. He’s predicting that AFTER the expected lockout, teams like SFG and NYY will have a “feeding frenzy” with free agents. He predicts they will not get what they had hoped for. Could be the reason those 2 (and other) teams are holding back with spending. And I’m glad they’re not signing pitchers on long term contracts or for Scherzer$. All these posters that are angry that FZ isn’t signing these recent signees must have forgotten about Zito, Cain, Cueto and Samardziga. I also think FZ could be making trades. Comments you 2?

          1
          Reply
        • claude raymond

          4 years ago

          Oops, *he predicts the PLAYERS will not get what they had hoped for *

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          4 years ago

          I admit to hoping FZ would re-sign Gausman, or he’d sign Ray. But unlike most people that post here I don’t know if teams will regret some of these longer term deals or not. I can’t speak definitively the way some do, but I definitely see the potential for some to be bad.

          But, FZ is a lot smarter about baseball, baseball deals, and probably generally as well, than I am. I have to think he had an idea what the limit was, and would not exceed that limit. On the one hand it’s a little disappointing, but I trust FZ, and have to believe he did the right thing not out-bidding the Jays and M’s for these guys.

          And to what Buster Olney said, all I can say is, I hope he’s right.

          1
          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          4 years ago

          As to those other signings, Cain, etc., I don’t think they were that bad, in general. A GM, or PBO doesn’t have a crystal ball. The Zito signing seemed obviously bad at the time, but I think that was Magowan’s doing. Cain had one of, if not his best, season after signing the extension, but then fell off a cliff. Cueto was one of the top FA SPs available, and also dominated initially. Injuries were the problem.

          I didn’t particularly like the Samardzija signing, but it wasn’t that bad as a mid-rotation guy. Look at the 3 similar FA SPs that year, Zimmermann, Leake, and Samardzija. Of the 3, Samardzija performed the best. He was cheaper than Zimmermann, and gave the Giants an ERA of 4.24 over 110 starts. While Zimmermann gave the Tigers a 5.63 ERA over 97 starts for $20M more.

          I know people hated the Samardzija signing, especially towards the end, but no team expects full value for every year. Yeah, it seemed like a bad signing to many, but relatively speaking, it wasn’t terrible.

          2
          Reply
        • SFGiants4ever

          4 years ago

          Claude, don’t lump Cain in with any bad contract talk, if you know anything about sports and team signings then you wouldn’t even think of him in the same vane.
          Cueto also wasn’t a terrible signing at the time, he, like Cain, had injuries that no one saw coming after being durable prior to 2017.

          1
          Reply
        • Pete'sView

          4 years ago

          tad2b13 -Agree with everything you said, especially about Zito and The Shark.

          Reply
        • claude raymond

          4 years ago

          My point regarded length of contract. Cain performed well for a bout half the length. Zito 1 great year and was playoff hero. Cueto too long and Shark too long. Yes, I loved the signings when signed. But they ALL ended up being too long. So, no, I won’t get excited about 5 year contracts for pitchers. Nor for $40 million even at 3 years. So SFgiantForever, what I do know about sports (kinda lame you said that btw) and about life in general, you don’t keep doing the same things that you say you’d never do again. And the Giants and Zaidi have said they won’t do these types of contracts for PITCHERS again.

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          4 years ago

          Claude, it’s easy for us, especially with hindsight, to see which signings were bad. But nothing happens in a vacuum. I see posts all the time, where someone say they wouldn’t give so-and-so more than 3 years. But the result is, if you draw the line at 3 years, he signs elsewhere.

          Most people making those types of posts are equating length with productivity. FOs don’t think that way. If they go 5 years, to entice a guy to sign, and they get 3.5 to 4 years of productive output, that’s a good deal. No one is signing a desirable FA, whose probably going to be productive for, say 4 years, to a 4 year deal. It’s going to take more years and some team will offer that.

          Again, Zito is an outlier, but for Cain and Cueto, you have to offer the years or they go elsewhere.

          But you’re right that the length is the issue. I’m guessing money wasn’t the issue when FZ decided not to outbid for Gausman and Ray, but that he didn’t think they’d be productive for a majority of length of the deal, Samardzija is a good example though. The last season was painful, but he performed at a #3 level, at an appropriate salary, for 3 of the 5 years. Fans hate that end of the contract, but that’s what FOs are willing live with. But, it’s always a gamble.

          Reply
        • waters33

          4 years ago

          That’s not really accurate. As a Royals fan his arm was giving him issues in his short time in KC.

          Reply
        • claude raymond

          4 years ago

          Tad, your post makes great sense. But if a pitcher is typically great for 3 (or 3.5 years or even 4) wouldn’t it have been better to sign him for 3 years and then maybe a 4th option year. What pitcher has been good for 5 of a 5 year deal? I’m not spending the $, the owner is and FZ is deciding how the owner spends it. So my essential point here is FZ sees 5 years as a waste when 2, 3 or 2-3 with options is more prudent. I guess my best counted to your solid post is this: What team has signed a pitcher to 3 years and regrets not giving 5 years to that pitcher. I’m having trouble finding examples.

          Reply
  7. Pete'sView

    4 years ago

    Given the great arms that have flown off the market in the last 10 days, this is an underwhelming signing for the Giants. Even if they can get more out of Cobb than he’s EVER shown, he will hardly move the needle in SF.

    Giants are running out of quality options. If they can pry Castillo from the Reds, and maybe sign Stroman, they can be good, if not dominating. I’m surprised Giants haven’t tied up at least on big-time FA. I know, it takes two to tango.

    4
    Reply
    • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

      4 years ago

      Nooooooo! Do NOT get Castillo. I don’t even know if the Giants can fix him. Sign Stroman for sure though. There are still some position players on the board that they have reported interest in, although we heard that about almost every top FA since Zaidi took over in SF

      1
      Reply
      • BRUH.SF.BRUH

        4 years ago

        @pete fix Castillo? Lol what’re you even saying?

        2
        Reply
        • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

          4 years ago

          My apologies. I must have had him mixed up with another player

          Reply
      • Pete'sView

        4 years ago

        I think the Giants (who originally signed and developed Castillo) might be able to take him EVEN HIGHER. And he’s pretty damn good now.

        1
        Reply
  8. Buzz Saw

    4 years ago

    Age 34 and often injured. I don’t get it

    4
    Reply
    • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

      4 years ago

      Nor do I. Why didn’t they make a full-hearted attempt for Ray?

      1
      Reply
      • TheWomanWithTheGlassEye

        4 years ago

        How do you know they didn’t make an attempt? Only one team is going to sign a player. He has the choice. Not gonna overpay for everyone.

        2
        Reply
        • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

          4 years ago

          The only thing we heard was they were interested. Generally when a team makes a hard push we hear about it

          1
          Reply
      • andremets

        4 years ago

        I can think of 115 million reasons why they didn’t try to get Ray.

        1
        Reply
        • Pete'sView

          4 years ago

          Especially as he’s never pitched to this quality ever before. Maybe he found himself, but if he’s not the real deal, the Mariners will be dragged down by 5yrs/$115M. Big gamble for that chunk of change.

          1
          Reply
    • scottn59c

      4 years ago

      It was a similar story with Alex Wood, who, while younger than Cobb is now, had been written off, but under the right conditions (and health), filled out the middle of the rotation just fine.

      Reply
      • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

        4 years ago

        Although, Wood has had some decent seasons in the past. I can’t speak for Cobb who I know nothing about his past numbers

        1
        Reply
        • Noel1982

          4 years ago

          Wood as a Late brave and first couple dodgers years was better then anything gausman or disco ever put out! During the 2016 trade deadline I figure price played a role in it but dodgers supposedly considered wood a better pitcher then David price !

          2
          Reply
        • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

          4 years ago

          Did he do better than 2.80(might’ve been a little higher but I believe it was below 2.90)?

          Reply
        • Noel1982

          4 years ago

          2014. With braves and 2917 with dodgers though only 25 starts he had a lower era than that

          1
          Reply
        • Noel1982

          4 years ago

          Wood was really good he still is he’ just always seems on borrowed time

          1
          Reply
        • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

          4 years ago

          Ah

          Reply
  9. to4

    4 years ago

    DFA two years ago ? And the Jays paid this guys rather than giving it to Ray who won the Cy ? Unless Ray didn’t want to return to Canada because of the uncertainty with COVID or anything else personal related, that’s ridiculous !!!!

    Reply
    • Dexxter

      4 years ago

      Uhhh….

      Jays paid Ray less last year than the Giants paid Gausman in 2020. Ray wasn’t DFAd… but he wasn’t exactly in high demand 12 months ago.

      Ray has more upside but Gausman has a more consistent track record and higher floor. With the Jays offense I see why they would prefer the player less likely to win a Cy Young… but also less likely to pumpkin.

      1
      Reply
      • tstats

        4 years ago

        The DFA was in reference to Guasman

        Reply
  10. pburns65

    4 years ago

    Thanks Chaim

    Reply
  11. analyzer87

    4 years ago

    Did the alex wood ever get finalized? Cobb may be replacing him

    2
    Reply
    • SFGiants4ever

      4 years ago

      Wood is signed for 2 years.

      1
      Reply
      • scottn59c

        4 years ago

        I don’t think he is yet, actually?

        3
        Reply
        • SFGiants4ever

          4 years ago

          Scott, I stand corrected, I read something about them having Disco and Wood taken care of and looking for others but you’re right I don’t see anything that he actually did sign.

          1
          Reply
  12. Dorothy_Mantooth

    4 years ago

    The Giants still need to fill the massive hole left by Gausman’s departure. With all the talk about this being the year the Giants would spend money, I’m not impressed with what they have done so far. They are losing Posey & Gausman and most of the best FA pitchers have signed already. I guess they could sign Stroman, but I think he’ll get more money elsewhere. The Giants will be taking a step back this season unless they make some late big moves or trades to improve their club.

    7
    Reply
    • williemaysfield

      4 years ago

      After a 107 win season and losing Posey their taking a huge step back. 90 wins would be a major success. Looks like 7 teams each league will make the playoffs

      Reply
  13. IjustloveBaseball

    4 years ago

    Wonder if the Giant’s approach from here on out will be to land some reclamation-type arms. Could see Kikuchi or Bundy, among others, fitting that mold.
    Although, Stroman or Rodon could still be in play for SF.

    1
    Reply
  14. Redwolves3

    4 years ago

    Zaidi playing like he is in a small market with a limited budget. Doesn’t look like he wants to make a significant (“splash”) move.

    So far Zaidi doesn’t seem like a real “Executive of the Year recipient.”

    3
    Reply
    • Noel1982

      4 years ago

      I think it’s dumb if he’s in a big market but wants to be strictly like Oakland with player acquisitions ! He doesn’t need to limit himself to that he can do that and the big market stuff like the dodgers he worked for

      1
      Reply
      • scottn59c

        4 years ago

        I think Zaidi’s does not want to go 5+ years to sign a marquee free agent pitcher.

        I don’t blame him. I like Kevin Gausman, but not for that long. Same with Robbie Ray. I think Zaidi wants to sign no more than a three year deal, and that’s not going to land any of the top free agent pitchers in these desperate times, where teams are paying too much $$$ (See: Mets and Scherzer) or signing pitchers to 5+ year deals.

        4
        Reply
        • claude raymond

          4 years ago

          Scott, people forget about previous long term mistakes like Cueto and Samardzija,not to mention Cain and Zito. If these knuckleheads think FZ is done, they must’ve slept April to October

          4
          Reply
        • scottn59c

          4 years ago

          Agreed!

          1
          Reply
    • AshamedMethGoat

      4 years ago

      No, Zaidi knows last year was an outlier and that the team will regress this year and is sticking to his rebuild plan by filling needs with stopgap solutions until they’re ready to contend.

      History will show the Giants’ 2021 season to be one of the greatest one-year anomalies of all time. Not hating on their amazing 107 wins, as they clearly were not lucky…they were 107-win GOOD last year, but there’s no way this core, which had been in decline for several years, turns in another collective career year. I mean, Posey is already gone.

      That being said, I think they’re a solid 85-win team next year.

      2
      Reply
      • Noel1982

        4 years ago

        I struggle find any kind of internal improvement from them last year to counter the sure regression and I struggle! Webb will do well to pitch close to the pace he was the last half of last year for a full season maybe a full year of doval but other then that I guesss yaz playing closer to the previous two years then last year and belt staying healthy ( good luck there ) for longer periods !

        Reply
        • scottn59c

          4 years ago

          The offseason is young! Giants may trade from prospect depth for a pitcher on a rebuilding team rather than overpay in free agency. They might also put forth a high risk/high reward rotation and pivot to signing an elite CF or 2B.

          Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      So far Zaidi doesn’t seem like a real “Executive of the Year recipient.”
      ================================
      He had the best record in BB. Why wouldn’t he deserve the Exec award?

      8
      Reply
      • giant4life

        4 years ago

        Out in the first round of the playoffs maybe? Also that guy in ATL who acquired 4 outfielders once they lost Acuna so he could get his team in the playoffs. Farhan got Bryant though so maybe he deserves a runner up trophy

        Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        4 years ago

        Precisely, JoeBrady. How can anyone criticize him for getting a pitcher who had better numbers than the highly touted Castillo? Especially when FZ just put together a WS contender out of nowhere.

        It isn’t luck to have an entire pitching staff do well – to play above their level. That’s good coaching, just like the Yankees had in Matt Blake.

        Reply
    • foppert

      4 years ago

      I think they have just invested pretty heavily in coaching. As part of that, it’s very much a “team first” prerequisite. That way best fits certain type of players. The big money “superstar” probably isn’t one of them. Don’t think Barry would be getting his clubhouse throne chair with these Giants. Change of approach that’s going ok. Here’s hoping Alex Cobb fits right in !

      4
      Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      4 years ago

      Redwolves3:

      Executive of the Year is awarded for what the team accomplished the previous season. In the Giants case that’s 107 wins, and taking down the Dodgers for the division crown. What fans think of the off-season moves of a PBO has no impact on Executive of the Year.

      1
      Reply
      • tstats

        4 years ago

        Yet it will affect next years

        Reply
  15. D-Lew

    4 years ago

    Excellent addition ! Don’t fool yourself if you think the Giants are done in the free agent market.

    8
    Reply
  16. Central Valley

    4 years ago

    I hate to say it, but the Giants may have a tough time selling tickets next year.

    Hopefully I’m wrong…

    2
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      Maybe you could supply some context. Maybe y’all west coast people have different priorities, but over here, in the east coast, having the best record in baseball would be perceived as a positive.

      10
      Reply
      • Central Valley

        4 years ago

        My point is that fans were expecting at least one All Star type talent to be signed by now. The ballpark is fully paid off, lots of money off of the books, etc. Go get a stud!

        I trust what Farhan is doing, have a ton of confidence in what he’s accomplished thus far, but I know that folks want an acquisition to get excited about. Attract people to the park.

        Even with winning 107 games last year, there were a ton of empty seats. I understand Covid, but the Dodgers stadium was consistently packed.

        Like I said, I hope I’m wrong.

        2
        Reply
        • User 2079935927

          4 years ago

          Check your calendar. It’s 11/29/21.

          3
          Reply
        • giant4life

          4 years ago

          This guy seems to know what he is talking about!

          Reply
        • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

          4 years ago

          @Finkle

          You do raise a good point. Although, free agents are flying off the board so it’s increasingly likely that the Giants will miss out on “all-star type talent”

          Reply
        • sanfranb27

          4 years ago

          Is it better to go after “a stud” and be rejected or go after solid “team-first” type players that know their role and will fight every AB using the techniques the current coaching staff gives them to be successful and continue to built a “team”? As the saying goes, sometimes it’s better to be thought of as a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. Big FA hitters (Stanton and Harper in the past for example) will tend to shy away from the Giants due to their stadium being considered a “pitchers park” and therefore they would need to overpay to bring them in. Let FZ work his magic and trust the process.

          2
          Reply
        • Pete'sView

          4 years ago

          sanfranb27 – Luckily, even that “pitchers park” label isn’t nearly as pronounced as it used to be.. I think the 2020 & 2021 teams proved that.

          2
          Reply
        • williemaysfield

          4 years ago

          Bryant is still available. Would that fit your idea of what player they should sign? Also the Dodgers where coming off 8 straight division titles and a World Series victory. Remember how packed Mays field was after the championships.
          Farnham is building a team not one or two guys. Not sure the Mets will make the playoffs with their current roster. Their spending crazy.

          Reply
  17. Lefty_Orioles_Fan

    4 years ago

    Another former Oriole replacing another former Oriole … Lol

    4
    Reply
    • User 355748524

      4 years ago

      Bruce Zimmerman and Brett Cumberland still have time to end up productive players, but…yeah.

      1
      Reply
    • SFGiants4ever

      4 years ago

      A bit less upside to the 35 year old replacement.

      2
      Reply
      • Jean Matrac

        4 years ago

        Correction: 34 year old replacement.

        3
        Reply
  18. Marshallx89

    4 years ago

    Interesting. There really must have been no interest in him at the trade deadline last season. I was under the impression he was not dealt because of mutual interest in extension – unless the giants offer was too good to pass up

    Reply
  19. gmenfan

    4 years ago

    Farhan reclamation project. Without knowing the figures, its hard to judge.

    I’m not quite sure what to think of all these Giants fans crying over losing out on Gausman though. Almost as if they forgot how mediocre he was in the second half of the season(or most of his career for that matter).

    5
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      gmenfan5 mins ago
      I’m not quite sure what to think of all these Giants fans crying
      ======================================
      IMHO, they’re idiots. The SFG just had the best record in baseball. They got reasonable extensions on Belt, Crawford, and DeSclafani.

      4
      Reply
  20. jvent

    4 years ago

    Wow lost Posey, Gausman,Cueto ( not a big deal ) , probably Bryant

    Reply
  21. Balk

    4 years ago

    Long relief, or bullpen arm. The Giants are still rebuilding, and last year everything went right. I’ll take a .500 season if the needle keeps moving

    1
    Reply
  22. Vizionaire

    4 years ago

    any ok pitchers go to sf and become good pitchers. and dumb teams buy them only to discover they are no good.

    2
    Reply
  23. AA_Cardinals

    4 years ago

    I had hoped the Cardinals would have been able to sign both Alex Wood and Alex Cobb. Both are reliable innings eaters but not top of the rotation guys. With a literal arms race every year, length in the bullpen is at least as important as lightning on the mound.

    5
    Reply
    • Rsox

      4 years ago

      Cardinals signed Matz and have Wainwright/Hudson/Flaherty/Mikolas/Oviedo/Woodford/Cabrera/Libertore. Cards have some depth

      1
      Reply
      • sanfranb27

        4 years ago

        And a lot of that “depth” is untested, injury prone or aging.

        Reply
    • Pete'sView

      4 years ago

      Cob and Wood are anything but “innings eaters.” Take a look at their stats. When he’s healthy, Wood is terrific arm, Cobb so-so. But we’ll see what the SF coaching staff can do with Cobb.

      Reply
  24. Rsox

    4 years ago

    Cobb to replace Cueto on a 1 or two year deal isn’t terrible. Giants still need to find a replacement for Gausman.

    I would say don’t sleep on Dylan Bundy. The Giants fixed Gausman they could probably fix him too

    8
    Reply
    • User 2079935927

      4 years ago

      Cobb wasn’t’ “broke” in 2021. just nagging injuries.

      3
      Reply
    • Big glove502

      4 years ago

      I doubt this is the biggest move they make. I think that skipping on the tier 1 players it frees up the opportunity to fill several holes for around the same amount of money. Say they get Stroman or Rodon, then they get a Chris Taylor. You can now look at an Iglesias for the pen, and solidify pitching depth with a Duffy, Smyly, Paxton, or Bundy. You would probably still have a few bargain bin pickups as well.

      1
      Reply
  25. preauto

    4 years ago

    WAit….I didn’t see Rangers anywhere in this story.

    1
    Reply
    • Datashark

      4 years ago

      Because Rangers only deal in hundreds of millions.

      5
      Reply
  26. SFGLifer

    4 years ago

    As of now the Giants rotation would be Webb, Wood? Disco, Cobb and Hjelle. Yikes.

    Reply
    • scottn59c

      4 years ago

      It’s worse than last year, yeah, but they are not done adding. As another poster said, Cobb > Cueto, and if the Giants grab Stroman or one of the top remaining FA pitchers, they won’t have the most fearsome rotation in MLB, but they’ll have a decent crop of guys in a pitchers’ park. There will be some competition at camp, too, for prospects to rise up. A year ago, Logan Webb was seen as a scrub. Maybe Tyler Beede will finally get it right this season if he’s healthy. Maybe it’s a Selman or someone like that.

      2
      Reply
      • Datashark

        4 years ago

        Beede better get it going from the start or he will be DF’a and he needs turn down the number of walks or he will start looking like a career milb AAA player.
        am sure his actress wife wants a MLB’er not a minor league bus rider.

        2
        Reply
        • foppert

          4 years ago

          Zaidi hasn’t given up on Beede. Has hopes. Bought him up specifically on a recent fan podcast he did with Fleming.

          1
          Reply
      • sanfranb27

        4 years ago

        Can’t forget about Sammy Long as well.

        Reply
      • Pete'sView

        4 years ago

        Selman is with the Angels.

        Reply
    • Rsox

      4 years ago

      Disco Wood Conb Webb

      The Giants rotation is also a fun word game

      1
      Reply
    • SFGiants4ever

      4 years ago

      Hjelle is not ML ready (and even when he gets there he is at best a #5 but probably a reliever in the end). Hopefully they find someone because Hjelle will not help them.

      1
      Reply
  27. Datashark

    4 years ago

    Cobb sure had some awful years with Baltimore….am starting to wonder if Baltimore is a way-station for other MLB teams.

    Reply
  28. scottn59c

    4 years ago

    What kind of prospect capital might the Giants deal if they lose out on the FA pitcher market? Joey Bart became all the more essential with the loss of Posey. Ramos and Luciano are most likely untouchable?

    Reply
    • Datashark

      4 years ago

      Matos is their legit OF…..that is what teams will be trying to pick at…they need to KEEP him.

      4
      Reply
      • Giants74

        4 years ago

        Matos is considered average. Bishop and Ramos are better.

        1
        Reply
        • mattwild1

          4 years ago

          Bishop is not better than Matos lol

          6
          Reply
        • BRUH.SF.BRUH

          4 years ago

          @Giants74 Matos is considered average? He’s ranked well above Bishop in every ranking and is surpassing Ramos on some. That information is way out dated.

          4
          Reply
        • Giants74

          4 years ago

          Ok. I confused him with Toribo. But, to say those two are not legit is ridiculous.

          Reply
        • Giants74

          4 years ago

          Matos has played a lot longer than Bishop. He should be pretty good when he comes up.

          1
          Reply
        • EBJ

          4 years ago

          Pomares is their best outfield prospect in A ball and maybe the whole system.

          Reply
        • SFGiants4ever

          4 years ago

          No Matos is their best OF prospect even above Ramos, Pomares is probably 3rd after them.
          Bishop has a lot to prove to get back in future plans.

          2
          Reply
        • Datashark

          4 years ago

          Luis Matos aged 19, Low-A 15HR 21SB .313
          Hunter Bishop Aged 23 ROK .160 , A .000, A+ .167 — across board 0 HR

          Hunter Bishop is no where near Matos level neither is Ramos
          although Ramos will get a MLB entry in 2022

          1
          Reply
    • sanfranb27

      4 years ago

      Luciano, Matos, Pomares, Harrison and Corry are untouchable IMO. Bart would get a big return and we could use a defense first catcher (Hedges or someone like him) until Genoves/Bailey are ready to take over.

      2
      Reply
      • scottn59c

        4 years ago

        Giants would be selling low on Bart if they traded him now. He’s ready for (and has earned) an opportunity to step it up at the bigs. Genoves has looked decent, but has nowhere near the same ceiling as Bart. Bailey sucked last year and needs a lot more seasoning in the minors. So if those other prospects you listed are untouchable, who does that leave to dangle for SP? Ramos?

        Reply
        • Datashark

          4 years ago

          Bailey in A hit .322 then fizzled in tough A+ where many players seem to have hard time adapting.
          Bailey hardly sucked he had bad luck in A+ for sure but his .322 was a bright spot showed he can hit – I bet he is put in AA next season and does well

          Reply
        • scottn59c

          4 years ago

          @Datashark: I’m not giving up in Bailey; he may turn into a productive player. But he didn’t even break the Mendoza line in A+ in 155 plate appearances. He sucked there, no doubt about it. Also, it’s hard to know if he’ll stick as a catcher. He may end up being Belt’s replacement in another season or two.

          But the greater point is that trading him now would be a mistake. Giants need him to demonstrate that he can continue developing or is intriguing enough to return an asset that they value more.

          Reply
      • hopper15

        4 years ago

        Corry is eligible to be selected for the Rule 5 Draft. He’s hardly untouchable.

        Reply
      • Datashark

        4 years ago

        Harrison and Corry Blah! they would deal them in an instant

        Reply
  29. Datashark

    4 years ago

    Giants need to sign a top of rotation type player…if they dont they might as well sign up to 7 SPs because they are going to need to align their starts with best possiblities than an actual rotation….

    cause outside Webb it falls down a few flights to Disco,
    then Wood, then it trips like biden on a staircase to Cobb
    After Cobb it face plants into cement with Beede or Long.

    4
    Reply
  30. Joseph Gonzalez

    4 years ago

    I actually like this move for the giants

    3
    Reply
    • Datashark

      4 years ago

      whats not to like a pitcher with history of arm trouble, has had only 31 starts in 3 years, outside of 2021 next quality year was 4 years before….not a strikeout pitcher.
      Maybe they can turn it around…and continue what he did with Angels which is just ok.

      2
      Reply
      • sanfranb27

        4 years ago

        Gausman was a washed up SP until he succeeded in the bullpen for the Reds and our coaches got him back in the rotation. Gausman needed a third different speed option to make it as a SP the entire season and that showed up in the second half. It also didn’t help that Gausman lost 2 MPH on his fastball as the year closed. I’m glad they didn’t chase after Gausman or Ray. Ray has always had the strikeout stuff but never had the control. He washed out of Arizona due to his inconsistencies and a return to the West with the Giants would have been a mistake.

        Reply
  31. Cora the Destroya

    4 years ago

    Another day, another pitcher off Chaim Bloom’s “can’t afford” list.

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      Yeah, where would we be without Cobb?

      Reply
    • Rsox

      4 years ago

      All things being equal between Wacha and Cobb the Sox are probably better with Wacha

      Reply
  32. Datashark

    4 years ago

    cause they are on the cusp of signing and not heard of any other team in there on Wood.

    Reply
  33. PutPeteRoseInTheHall

    4 years ago

    The only reason that Zaidi’s moves this offseason, or lack of moves, is ok, is the Giants are not really in a “win-now” position. They have a strong farm system, with some players in it getting close to reaching the Major Leagues. One problem is, though, the Giants aren’t very strong in the pitching area of the farm system

    Reply
    • BRUH.SF.BRUH

      4 years ago

      @pete the Giants are pretty deep in pitching at the lower levels. They had the top 2 strikeout leaders in Low A and several others across low and high A that were right up there. Harrison has legit TOR stuff.

      2
      Reply
      • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

        4 years ago

        I’m basing my statement off of farm system rankings. The Giants are higher in the position player rankings than they are in pitching rankings. Not to say that they don’t have talent in the farm, but they definitely could benefit from some talented pitchers.

        Reading my comment again, I realize it does carry a little more of a negative connotation than I intended

        Reply
      • SFGiants4ever

        4 years ago

        Unfortunately the Giants best hope for starters are all AA or below and none would be expected to be ready anytime before 23′ if not 24′.
        It would have been great to get Gausman for 3 years to hopefully be a steady force near the top of the rotation.

        Reply
      • sanfranb27

        4 years ago

        Not to mention Corry and Beck.

        Reply
  34. LordD99

    4 years ago

    Need to see the financials but seems like a solid pickup for the Giants.

    3
    Reply
    • Veejh

      4 years ago

      Why?

      1
      Reply
  35. steelerbravenation

    4 years ago

    Dylan Bundy will be next

    1
    Reply
    • SFGiants4ever

      4 years ago

      He gives up a lot of HRs which Management tries to avoid pitchers who fall in that category. But who knows maybe they can get lucky with another makeover?

      Reply
    • Pete'sView

      4 years ago

      ugh!

      1
      Reply
  36. Gwynning

    4 years ago

    With all honesty to my G-men friends- I’ve never seen these SD trolls in a Padre forum. Is it a conspiracy to suggest they’re not even Padre fans? That aside, nice moves so far for SF!

    11
    Reply
    • Pete'sView

      4 years ago

      No, there is one guy (who I’ve muted) who signs on as a San Diego fan who is just a troll repeating the same negative Giants drivel post after post.

      2
      Reply
  37. vtadave

    4 years ago

    4/80?

    Reply
    • sanfranb27

      4 years ago

      I thought I saw 2/16

      Reply
  38. rycm131

    4 years ago

    They usually
    Sign terrible players and those guys do ok….so who knows?

    1
    Reply
  39. Nevrfolow

    4 years ago

    High ground ball rate, above average K rate and an elite chase rate. Yeah that’s definitely something the giants can work with. With pitching costing more than most years, this is a good value.

    3
    Reply
  40. Angels & NL West

    4 years ago

    I was hoping the Angels would bring Cobb back as a SP4-SP6 at 2/$16MM – good depth signing.

    1
    Reply
  41. Giants10/12/14

    4 years ago

    Last year was kind of a fluke because the older guys killed the ball, but the Giants have a bunch of young position players coming up that can replace the production on offense, and the relief staff will be great again. We only needed one simple thing – starting pitching, and it looks like we’re striking out on all the top starters out there with $100 mil available to spend. Desclafani, Wood, and Cobb are serviceable, but completely unspectacular. We need to sign an ace with the resources we have. No joke, Zaidi should fire our GM tomorrow if he doesn’t sign a Kershaw or someone similar! Tomorrow!! He’s not doing his job so far!

    Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      4 years ago

      If FZ fires anyone for not signing Kershaw, or someone similar, he’d have to fire himself. FZ is the guy making these decisions not Scott Harris. When there’s a president of baseball ops, the GM is mostly relegated to contract issues, FZ is the one that determines the years/dollars he’s willing to offer. Harris gets it all in writing. Harris is not the one deciding whether to outbid the Jays for Gausman, or the M’s for Ray. Those are Zaidi’s decisions, and I trust he’s probably making the right decision.

      3
      Reply
      • Pete'sView

        4 years ago

        Plus, Kershaw is no longer an ace, is constantly injured and—if he doesn’t retire—will return to the Dodgers.

        3
        Reply
  42. JerryBird

    4 years ago

    Cobb stepped it up for his contract year, like players often do. He will will return to the broken down version of himself, now that he has a contract. Sorry Giant fans, I think this signing will be a bust.

    1
    Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      4 years ago

      Not sure how you can speak so definitively; that he definitely won’t perform. You got yourself a crystal ball or something?

      Of course, it it’s a one-year deal with the Giants, doesn’t that kind of shoot holes in your theory of only performing well in his walk year?

      2
      Reply
      • JerryBird

        4 years ago

        Probably the longest anyone offered.

        Reply
  43. Teamspirit

    4 years ago

    Darn, I wanted him to be an Angel again. He really inspired the club last year.

    2
    Reply
  44. Ron Tingley

    4 years ago

    Solid sign. He will give 15 – 20 good starts. His splitter is so good it spilts blisters. Just dont expect 25-30 starts and it will be a great sign.

    4
    Reply
  45. Spare Tire Dixon

    4 years ago

    With Posey retired now, would you give up Joey Bart’s potential for Wilson Contreras’ win-now appeal?

    Reply
    • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

      4 years ago

      No. I don’t think that would be a good move. Contreras doesn’t fit the “next man up” mentality that the Giants’ players seem to all have

      2
      Reply
    • Gmen777

      4 years ago

      In spite of the 107 wins this season I think Zaidi is still sticking to his plan and gonna go more long term.

      4
      Reply
      • SFGLifer

        4 years ago

        Farhan is behaving like he’s back on the A’s. Maybe b/c attendance is down to 20k a game, or maybe he’s waiting for more prospects to graduate and become regular contributors before spending like a contender. Either way, this offseason has been a massive downer coming of 107 wins…

        2
        Reply
  46. greatgame 2

    4 years ago

    Bad signing. Huge overpay

    2
    Reply
  47. angels fan for life

    4 years ago

    I wish u well Cobb beat the dodger

    2
    Reply
  48. angt222

    4 years ago

    Overpaid.

    1
    Reply
  49. nentwigs

    4 years ago

    MISSED IT BY THAT [ = ] MUCH !!
    According to informed sources, The Marlins were in on Alex Cobb right up until he signed the deal to join the Giants.. The Marlins made a “strong” offer, but not one that matched the Giants’ financial commitment. The Marlins weren’t the only team to be outbid.
    The Minnesota Twins had also been linked to Cobb.

    1
    Reply
  50. lumber and lighting

    4 years ago

    I believe SF will get behind him.He can pitch!People forget how good Cobb can be.

    1
    Reply
  51. orange2001

    4 years ago

    Cobb will be a nice fit with the Giants and is better suited for the NL. I liked what I saw from him last season with the Angels. When he wasn’t injured, he was pretty steady… you can count on 5-6 innings and 2-3 runs.

    SF should take a shot with Dylan Bundy, who has the potential to turn into a frontline starting pitcher. He pitched like a legit #2 in 2020 but reverted to mediocrity last season. I’m sure he could be had for $3M. SF might be able to turn him around and into another Gausman.

    2
    Reply
  52. Dbacks44

    4 years ago

    Absolutely Brillant move. Bet you anything he has a better record then Gausman. People don’t understand that the ballpark means so much. There’s a reason people do well in Oakland and San Fran.Then when they leave they get worse.

    if cobb stays healthy he will win 15 games with a 3.3 era

    3
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Red Sox To Promote Roman Anthony

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Recent

    Red Sox To Promote Roman Anthony

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment

    Red Sox Designate Robert Stock For Assignment, Select Brian Van Belle

    Trade Rumors Front Office Subscriber Chat Transcript

    Rich Hill Has June 15 Opt-Out In Royals Deal

    AJ Smith-Shawver Undergoes Tommy John Surgery

    Poll: What Will The Rangers Do At The Deadline?

    Mets Select Justin Garza

    Submit Your Questions For This Week’s Episode Of The MLBTR Podcast

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version