Headlines

  • Astros Promote Brice Matthews
  • Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow
  • Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers
  • Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help
  • Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays
  • Yankees Release DJ LeMahieu
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers Have Interest In Xander Bogaerts, Alex Reyes

By Maury Ahram | November 27, 2022 at 1:16pm CDT

The Dodgers have joined the growing list of suitors for four-time All-Star and two-time World Series Champion Xander Bogaerts, according to reporter Marino Pepén. Pepén adds that the Cubs and Twins have also joined Bogaerts’ market, adding to a list that also houses the Phillies, Red Sox, and Padres.

With the departure of Trea Turner, the Dodgers are among the teams looking to secure a shortstop this winter, having recently been connected to the Brewers’ Willy Adames. MLBTR predicted that Bogaerts will receive a seven-year, $189MM deal this offseason.

The 30-year-old hit a strong .307/.377/.456 in 2022, witnessing a noticeable drop in power compared to 2021 (23 HRs, .493 slugging in 2021; 15 HRS, .456 slugging in 2022). Nevertheless, Bogaerts posted his fifth-straight season with a wRC+ over 125 and kept his strikeout rate below 19% for the eighth season in a row. Additionally, the nine-year vet posted his strongest defensive season of his career by measure of every publicly available metric (4 Defensive Runs Saved, 4.9 Ultimate Zone Rating, 5 Outs Above Average). Bogaerts’ glove had been discussed as his primary flaw, having been rated as a below-average defender and a candidate for an eventual position change. His strong defensive 2022 season will likely aid his ability to remain at the premium shortstop position, positioning him for a contract near $200MM.

From a financial standpoint, Bogaerts, along with Dansby Swanson, represent cheaper alternatives to Carlos Correa and Turner (both projected to sign contracts worth more than $250MM by MLBTR). Nevertheless, with the recent non-tendering of Cody Bellinger and the decision to decline Justin Turner’s 2023 club option, the Dodgers currently have only $152MM committed to their 2023 payroll, per RosterResource (after finishing the 2022 season with more than $260MM on their books). A Dodgers/Bogaerts deal would push the team up to $179MM — leaving ample room for another potential blockbuster signing.

The Dodgers have also been linked to free agent reliever Alex Reyes, per Juan Toribio of MLB.com. MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz had projected the two-time All-Star to receive $2.85MM in his penultimate trip through the arbitration process, but the Cardinals opted to non-tender the flamethrower.

Reyes, who was once ranked as one of the best prospects in all of baseball, has dealt with ailments his entire career. He underwent Tommy John surgery in 2017, tore a tendon in his lat in 2018, and underwent shoulder surgery in 2020. After a healthy 2021 season where Reyes earned All-Star honors while pitching to a 3.24 ERA in 72 1/3 innings with a robust 30.0% strikeout rate, albeit with an extremely high 16.4% walk rate, injuries returned. Reyes would be forced to undergo season-ending shoulder surgery in May, wiping out his entire 2022 season.

Despite Reyes having an unclear timetable to return, the Dodgers have earned a reputation for signing injured relievers to multi-year contracts, with the expectation that the player will perform in the later years of the deal. Additionally, Dodgers’ pitching coach Mark Prior has been highly regarded in recent years for his work, with Los Angeles’ bullpen pitching to the second-lowest ERA (2.87), fourth-highest strikeout percentage (26.7%), and second-lowest walk percentage (7.5%) in the entire league.

Share 0 Retweet 5 Send via email0

Los Angeles Dodgers Notes Alex Reyes Xander Bogaerts

Padres Sign Julio Teheran To Minor League Deal
Main
Roberto Osuna To Re-Sign With NPB’s Chiba Lotte Marines
View Comments (111)
Post a Comment

111 Comments

  1. MLB-1971

    3 years ago

    Are there any teams not ‘in’ on Bogaerts? LOL

    11
    Reply
    • LordD99

      3 years ago

      The Red Sox.

      43
      Reply
      • all in the suit that you wear

        3 years ago

        and how do you know that?

        1
        Reply
        • amanateeamongmen

          3 years ago

          I believe LordD99 was making a joke.

          6
          Reply
        • Mi Casas es tu Casas

          3 years ago

          No he was not boston never had a real interest in retaining him

          1
          Reply
        • rememberthecoop

          3 years ago

          Yes, do not put false narratives before pur Lord!!

          Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          3 years ago

          But he’s right, you know. If we were interested, Bogaerts would already be signed with us for next year.

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          3 years ago

          Pedey: I’m thinking the Red Sox have offered Xander a high AAV deal for 5-6 years. I think the number of years will be the sticking point. I doubt they have a problem paying him $30-35M or maybe more per year.

          2
          Reply
    • Indiansjoe

      3 years ago

      Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Tampa. But if he was willing to sign at a significant discount they might lol

      4
      Reply
    • solaris602

      3 years ago

      What are the Padres thinking? They already have 2 shortstops. Preller’s goal seems to be to have a $20M+ player at every position.

      5
      Reply
      • Mystery13

        3 years ago

        Machado can opt out after this season and Soto only has 2 years of arbitration control. Probably want to cover themselves in case they can’t re sign 1 or both of those guys.

        Reply
        • stymeedone

          3 years ago

          So no reason to address openings that haven’t happened. What if Michael has a down year and doesn’t opt out? What if Soto has two more years like 2022? Payroll is already stretched. Maybe look at 2023 needs first?

          1
          Reply
    • Larry Brown's crank

      3 years ago

      My Reds…:(

      5
      Reply
    • tiredolddude

      3 years ago

      Pirates. We’d rather load up on 1st basemen. Can never have enough, it appears

      3
      Reply
    • andremets

      3 years ago

      Mets

      Reply
    • snowyphile1

      3 years ago

      Are there any marquee FAs the Dodgers aren’t trying to sign?

      Reply
      • mlbdodgerfan2015

        3 years ago

        Seems like the Dodgers check-in on high profile for a couple of reasons. One, to signal to Dodger fans that they’re trying to sign high profile players even if that interest is not very high. Two, just in case the market for said player plummets and they can obtain that player at a discount or shorter term deal.

        To me, at shortstop, it seems more likely that the Dodgers go to the cheaper route of either dealing for an existing player or going with Lux.

        Reply
  2. thatsright

    3 years ago

    Xander has his only good defensive year during his walk year. Interesting.

    7
    Reply
    • Jm207* 2

      3 years ago

      Defensive metrics vary so much year to year. I think you really have to trust the eye test.

      7
      Reply
      • richardc

        3 years ago

        Correct, there are some guys that the metrics will have rated as a bottom tier defender one year, and then the next they will have him rated in the top tier.

        I could be wrong, but I believe it was Mitch Haniger I was reading about the other day that has rotated between being a bottom and top defender multiple years in a row, or something like that.

        I mean, common sense tells you that a player’s abilities do not vary that much from year to year. Now, what might increase or decrease is the number of difficult plays a player is forced to try and make, and that would impact their defensive metrics, but overall, I’d tend to think a player’s defense remains fairly steady from year to year.

        That isn’t to say that Player A cannot become a better defender, look no further than the work Ron Washington has done with Austin Riley, Dansby Swanson, and Ozzie Albies, among others. So, I could understand a relatively slow but steady uptick in a player’s defense, but this whole he’s one of the worst defenders and then he’s one of the best defenders nonsense is clearly flawed..

        1
        Reply
        • goob

          3 years ago

          Guys play banged-up too and that creates a lot of variability. Brandon Crawford, for example, had a knee issue that affected his play last year, but late in the season he was back to full-range and playing like his former GG self.
          I think health, guys playing at 80-90%, is oftentimes a bigger factor than we know.

          3
          Reply
        • Oldman58

          3 years ago

          Castellanos was the worst outfielder defensively however he said his mind wanders during a 162 game season. He said he’s more focused in the playoffs Lolol

          Reply
        • stymeedone

          3 years ago

          Haniger has had injuries that may account for his variance. As to XB, he hasn’t gone from bottom to top. He’s gone from bad to barely average. Since the shift will be limited, it will be interesting to see how much his lack of range is a factor going forward.

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          3 years ago

          Let’s look at Bogie-s histories of partners. Once Pedie got hurt, it became a revolving door. While Story got hurt, he was probably the best defensive second baseman in the league. Add in Devers at third and you realize why metrics don’t rate him well historically.

          Reply
      • Jean Matrac

        3 years ago

        Because defensive metrics do vary, conventional wisdom is to look at a minimum of 2 seasons. 3 or 4 seasons is even better. So it’s one thing for the metrics to show up and down seasons, indicating something more median between the extremes. But it’s another thing when they’re not good over an entire career, with only one good one, which is the case with Bogaerts. The one good season would appear to be an outlier.

        1
        Reply
        • GreenMonsta

          3 years ago

          “3 or 4 seasons is even better”

          As long as you weight them. The further you get from the present, the less meaningful they become. Too often people add up and divide by 4 (seasons). — That analysis isn’t better.

          1
          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          3 years ago

          I said 3 or 4 because most recent stats are more germane. I’ve never heard of the add/divide approach, but I trust that you’re correct that some will do that.

          I agree, each year needs to be looked at individually. 3 great season with 1 poor one would suggest to me there was some reason for the poor 4th. Like bad or misleading data, injury, or just bad luck. I’d think the guy was a good defender, and not something equal to the average of the 4 seasons

          Reply
      • BlueSkies_LA

        3 years ago

        Or to put it less gently, defensive metrics are crap.

        2
        Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          3 years ago

          Wrong. They’re useful if they’re understood, and correctly interpreted. Though I’m sure Luddites will favor errors and fielding percentage.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          3 years ago

          BlueSkies – Thank you for saying it, they truly are crap.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          3 years ago

          tad – How can you be so trusting of some of these newer stats when the entities producing them don’t even agree with each other? For instance how do you know which to use, fWAR or bWAR or WARP? Having statistics that aren’t unilateral is an absolute joke.

          Try challenging some of the formulas, as I have already done numerous times, and you’ll soon realize not to believe everything you’re told.

          2
          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          3 years ago

          I look for consensus. Defensive metrics aren’t perfect, but when I see a general agreement over several seasons, I think it would be foolish to simply reject them as “crap”. They aren’t perfect, but they’re still better than looking at misleading stats like errors and fielding percentage.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          3 years ago

          No metric is “perfect” so that isn’t a useful criterion. Neither is favorably comparing a bad thing to something even worse.

          What you actually don’t see in defensive metrics is general agreement over seasons, what you see instead is players being measured as good and poor defenders in sequential seasons, and the different metrics coming to opposing results. Even looking at hundreds if not thousands of defensive encounters with a batted ball, the defensive metrics struggle to produce stable results. Even the people who like to cite them acknowledge this problem.

          So just because someone has created a statistic doesn’t mean they are measuring anything. Everything about the results of defensive metrics tells us they are measuring more noise than signal. So if it’s troublesome to call them crap, how about just pretty bloody useless?

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          3 years ago

          “What you actually don’t see in defensive metrics is general agreement over seasons, what you see instead is players being measured as good and poor defenders in sequential seasons, and the different metrics coming to opposing results.”

          That is totally untrue. You do see general agreement season to season, with occasional outliers. For example take Bogaerts over the last 4 seasons:

          2019: DRS -9, OAA -7
          2020: DRS -4, OAA -3
          2021: DRS -5, OAA -9
          2022: DRS 4, OAA 5

          The numbers agree. He had a good defensive year in 2022, But he’s clearly a below average defender

          Or look at Correa:

          2019: DRS 9, OAA 11
          2020: DRS 7, OAA 5
          2021: DRS 20, OAA 12
          2022: DRS 3, OAA -3

          All the numbers are in general agreement except for the outlier of Correa’s 2022. But it’s still reasonable to surmise that Correa is a good defender overall.

          Clearly, you’re wrong that you don’t see agreement over seasons. The numbers do generally agree Like hitting, players have some seasons when they’re better with the glove, and others where they’re not. But there’s good statistical evidence from defensive metrics who is a good defender and who isn’t.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          3 years ago

          I see no way to avoid defensive statistics. Maybe a real life example is inflation. There are a few ways of measuring it, but the overall conclusion is that inflation is high.

          And there is not reasonable alternative. You either listen to the statistic(s) of your choice, or you ignore it completely.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          3 years ago

          tad – I agree with you on errors and fielding percentage.

          Like many other things, stats become crap when they are misused or misunderstood.

          Like BABIP … a high number doesn’t necessarily mean the hitter is “lucky”, they could be a line drive hitter who hits the ball hard and hits them where they ain’t. Yet so many people don’t realize that and therefore misuse the stat.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          3 years ago

          Joe – I’m very glad you’re not a scout for my Boston Red Sox.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          3 years ago

          Only two players, and still you show Bogaerts going from being a poor defender to suddenly becoming a good one, and Correa, the opposite. Other players show even more radical departures from a mean, and more frequently.

          In reality you’re doing exactly what I’ve already mentioned, and that’s averaging multiple seasons together because those hundreds or thousands of defensive encounters in any given season aren’t enough for these models to produce stable statistical results. So, there’s my point again.

          The irony is your generalized conclusion that Bogaerts is a below average defender and Correa better than average could be made just as convincingly and with a whole lot less flimflam simply by watching them play the game. So what’s the value of the stat, really? Practically nothing, as far as I’ve ever been able to see. This is a problem with baseball today. Too many simply can’t believe their own eyes.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          3 years ago

          Sure, there’s an alternative, and it’s called using your eyes. I very much doubt teams are evaluating the defensive performance of their players merely or even primarily with stats. Coaches and managers can see when their players are playing their positions well, or not. They can also see why they are, or not, in ways statistics will never capture.

          The bottom line here is, many things are highly resistant to mathematical modeling and the trick is knowing when a model is suspect. Pushing a lot of data through the model and getting highly variable results is a big red flag.

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          3 years ago

          Hitter’s performance varies year to year, but defender’s can’t? If you can’t see some value in the numbers I feel sorry for you. You complain that I only showed 2 players, and yet you have shown zero, to back up your assertions. And, I am in no way averaging the numbers.

          I can’t see Bogaerts or Correa make every defensive play, making the eye test anecdotal evidence. But the stats do cover every play. Batting stats can also be misleading. so why bother looking at them? The data is there. If you choose to reject it, that’s your prerogative.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          3 years ago

          Aw, you feel sorry for me. What an argument.

          Reply
    • Larry Brown's crank

      3 years ago

      nothing wrong with putting in hard work with motivation. its a good recipe

      Reply
    • miltpappas

      3 years ago

      80% of athletes have their best seasons in walk years. Look it up.

      3
      Reply
      • avenger65

        3 years ago

        Should I look at someone like Judge, who probably had the best walk year in the history of the game.

        Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        3 years ago

        milt – I agree, guys like JD Martinez and Gallo are the exception.

        Reply
    • Show all 27 replies
  3. Trueblue 5

    3 years ago

    Wish Prior made all the pitching changes in a game, Roberts certainly can’t

    1
    Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      3 years ago

      So you don’t like the Friedman game plan and think it would change if someone else was implementing it?

      Explain.

      Reply
  4. MLB Top 100 Commenter

    3 years ago

    If anyone can resurrect Alex Reyes, it is the Dodgers.

    11
    Reply
  5. Neon Cop

    3 years ago

    The stench of desperation…

    1
    Reply
  6. rememberthecoop

    3 years ago

    I’m tired of seeing the Cubs mentioned on all the top FA’s. I’ll believe it when I see it.

    1
    Reply
  7. Mickey Steverman

    3 years ago

    Please don’t let the Dodgers get Reyes that would actually be a steal

    3
    Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      3 years ago

      You think? Reyes has been crazy wild for his entire career.

      Reply
      • Mickey Steverman

        3 years ago

        But Mark Prior seems to be the Pitcher Whisperer.

        Reply
  8. StupendousYappi

    3 years ago

    Can definitely understand why Bogarts would want to leave Boston. The team is the worst in the division by a mile with no chance of getting back to respectability anytime soon. Those fluke world championships were a long time ago I foresee another 1918 like drought in the future for them. As far as the Dodgers go I would take a shot on him. He did well in Boston and should really thrive leaving that toxic city and atmosphere.

    4
    Reply
    • all in the suit that you wear

      3 years ago

      LOL. Not very stupendous.

      1
      Reply
    • JeffreyChungus

      3 years ago

      This has gotta be bait lol

      3
      Reply
  9. King Floch

    3 years ago

    Sign Bogaerts, put him at 2B, and play Lux at SS.

    3
    Reply
    • Kewldood69

      3 years ago

      I don’t get the fascination with a Lux. Zero pop and horrible defense.

      2
      Reply
      • King Floch

        3 years ago

        He’s already a pretty solid player overall and he just turned 25, so it’s not outrageous to think he might have another gear or two that he can reach based on his prospect pedigree.

        Reply
        • rememberthecoop

          3 years ago

          I’m with you King. I like Luc.

          1
          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          3 years ago

          Especially when he uses the force!

          2
          Reply
    • Kewldood69

      3 years ago

      Nothing matters if Roberts is still at the helm and blowing one playoff game after the other.

      1
      Reply
    • all in the suit that you wear

      3 years ago

      Bogaerts wants to be paid as a shortstop not second baseman.

      2
      Reply
      • King Floch

        3 years ago

        The Dodgers can afford to pay a 2B like a SS.

        3
        Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          3 years ago

          Anything can happen. I’ll believe it when I see it.

          Reply
        • King Floch

          3 years ago

          I’m not sure what is so hard to believe about the Dodgers paying big bucks for a free agent they want or a free agent being willing to take their big bucks to have a shot at a WS ring every single year, but okay.

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          3 years ago

          I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m saying I think it’s a long shot that Bogaerts is the starting second baseman for the Dodgers next year. If it happens, I will gladly tip my cap to you.

          1
          Reply
        • King Floch

          3 years ago

          Fair enough. I’m just saying, whatever the Dodgers want, they usually get.
          Unless maybe Steve Cohen also wants what the Dodgers want lol.

          1
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          3 years ago

          I see. Agreed.

          Reply
  10. .

    3 years ago

    Why would the Dodgers want Bogarts when they could keep Trea Turner on instead??

    7
    Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      3 years ago

      Hi, Trumbo. Bogarts is expected to get $100 million less than Trea Turner.

      Personally, I think the Dodgers should pass on all of the big four shortstops. I am more worried about getting one more ace pitcher to add to Urias-Kershaw-Gonsolin-May.

      8
      Reply
      • Kewldood69

        3 years ago

        Bobby Miller Ida highly regarded prospect, but I expect a short term veteran signing like Verlander or DeGrom.

        1
        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          3 years ago

          Exactly, Miller, Grove and Pepiot are not ready for 2023 and one may be traded for a rental SS or CF. Verlander or deGrom for three years $110 to $120 million would be better than an 8-10 year deal for a BIg 4 shortstop.

          1
          Reply
        • Ella B

          3 years ago

          Manny, it’s going to take more than $120 million/3 for either JV or deGrom. Need to start at Scherzer’s 43 mil per year.

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          3 years ago

          I think Verlander may get $43 million per year. I think deGrom will get a lower AAV than that. But there is no comparable to deGrom, so close to a career ending injury and so close to being best pitcher in NL.

          3
          Reply
        • Ella B

          3 years ago

          Agreed, the risk, as is the reward, is huge. The question is, will the Rangers give deGrom 4/160?

          1
          Reply
      • Larry Brown's crank

        3 years ago

        manny…not my team, but….Urias is the most underrated pitcher in all of mlb

        1
        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          3 years ago

          Larry,

          I agree. Urias gives up a lot of solo home runs when he is up by multiple runs, which hurts his “fielding independent pitching”. But when you play on a team that is very high scoring and has great defense, FIP is not the best indicator.

          I hope that the Dodgers extend Urias this Winter to the tune of around eight years $192 million. He is young and talented. Hopefully he learned from his bad mistake in his personal life and will not repeat it. He does not seem like Osuna or Ozuna, who both seemed like bad apples.

          1
          Reply
    • LordD99

      3 years ago

      My belief remains that Bogaerts will remain a Red Sox. There’s a disconnect from their view on what Bogaerts is asking and what they believe the market will pay, so they’re letting him discover the market price isn’t as high as he hopes and then the two sides will negotiate a deal. The two are worth more together. It’s a rational approach with admittedly one problem: Scott Boras!

      3
      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        3 years ago

        I think Red Sox will either extend Devers or sign Bogarts by late January 2023. If they can sign Bogaerts for $180 to $190 million, I think the Red Sox are the clear front-runner notwithstanding Boras.

        Maybe six years at $30 million per year, with a club option for a seventh year at $30 million or a club buyout for $3 million.

        2
        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          3 years ago

          All you need is one crazy GM, but I otherwise agree with your and LordD. I don’t know if Bogaerts is any worse than these guys, but he is older and his defense is in question. I don’t think his numbers will be anything we can’t match, as much as a question of whether or not we want to match.

          2
          Reply
    • slider32

      3 years ago

      Boegarts is a little older and won’t cost as much, and he has more power. Turner will cost more and relies on speed, 32 infield hits!

      1
      Reply
      • Shrutefarm

        3 years ago

        That’s a fair point. Plus, there was a lot of swing and miss/chase from Trea in the 2nd half of the season. Add that to his lazy defense (yes, I said it), I could easily see the Dodgers moving on from Trea instead of paying his asking price.

        Reply
    • StreakingBlue

      3 years ago

      Per this article the Dodgers were no longer interested in Turner, which is news to me

      1
      Reply
      • BlueSkies_LA

        3 years ago

        This being in the article is news to me. I sure can’t find it.

        Reply
        • StreakingBlue

          3 years ago

          With the departure of Trea Turner, the Dodgers are among the teams looking to secure a shortstop this winter

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          3 years ago

          And where does it say the Dodgers are no longer interested in him? That’s the part of what you said that isn’t in the article.

          Reply
  11. The Saber-toothed Superfife

    3 years ago

    Go Tigers!
    Reyes was on his way to being one the best…….ever……

    Reply
  12. Terry B

    3 years ago

    Dodgers will definitely make a couple splash hits! Friedman always laying in weeds waiting to pounce, he rarely shows his hand until the deal is done!

    3
    Reply
    • slider32

      3 years ago

      Boegarts is the best fit for the Dodgers, and they can move him to third down the road!

      3
      Reply
    • Neon Cop

      3 years ago

      “Rarely shows his hand” LOL
      Every major signing they’ve had has been telegraphed for months…

      1
      Reply
      • compassrose

        3 years ago

        No you misunderstood he never shows his cue cards. Keeps them in breast pocket then pulls them out to announce the trade. He has one written up for every player all he does is change the name and a few more stats. It is true listen to him when he signs another player.

        Reply
      • Terry B

        3 years ago

        Do your homework, Friedman rarely shows his hand! The columnists make all the guess work. Betts deal no one saw coming, the Freeman move no one saw coming, the Padres thought they had Max Scherzer and literally minutes before the deadline, Friedman snagged not only Scherzer but Turner as well. He will do the same this year! Just because Dodgers have a ton of money and are usually linked to “ everyone” but Friedman rarely shows his hand!

        Reply
    • goob

      3 years ago

      @Terry B

      Stop it, “splash hits” is a proprietary Giants term.

      Reply
  13. Blank Frank

    3 years ago

    Don’t Bogaerts that joint my friend.

    Reply
    • whyhayzee

      3 years ago

      You’re not going to fill Xander’s shoes with those Little Feat.

      1
      Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      3 years ago

      When I think of Bogart and joint, I think of Rick’s Place in Casablanca.

      3
      Reply
    • easymoney

      3 years ago

      puff puff pass LOL

      Reply
  14. whyhayzee

    3 years ago

    I’m sure that Correa will get more money than Bogaerts, but to believe that Carlos is more valuable is comical. You would be out of your mind to not be interested in having Xander on your team.

    Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      3 years ago

      A power hitting 2B-3B versus a real SS who was a cheater, apples and oranges.

      4
      Reply
  15. CenterWingPolitics

    3 years ago

    Folks think the Dodgers are in on Xander as a SS…..we will wake up to them signing Xander to play 3B and then sign someone like Swanson/Turner to play SS.

    1
    Reply
  16. BaseballisLife

    3 years ago

    My wife just walked in and said, and I kind of quote, “F this bleep. The Padres are going to sign Bogey to play 2B and that F’ing Bloom is going to stick us with some 2nd rate schmuck at short.”

    She is one of those crazy Red Sox fans.

    3
    Reply
    • Mi Casas es tu Casas

      3 years ago

      Smart woman she’s a keeper

      Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      3 years ago

      Sleep with the light on is my advice.

      Reply
  17. rememberthecoop

    3 years ago

    “With the departure of Trea Turner…” – did I miss something, did Trea sign with some team? As often as I check this site, I find that hard to believe…

    2
    Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      3 years ago

      He’s a free agent so that’s officially departed.

      Reply
  18. 30 Parks

    3 years ago

    It’s possible Harper is luring Turner to Philly, with Betts drawing Bogaerts to LA. Turner is the better player, but both are good fits personnel wise.

    Reply
    • Cora the Destroya

      3 years ago

      Turner is getting up there in age. This year he was not fantastic.

      Reply
  19. Cora the Destroya

    3 years ago

    Would love to see him back in Boston but will not be upset if he signs elsewhere for much more money.

    1
    Reply
  20. brucenewton

    3 years ago

    Dodgers should sign one of Bogaerts/Turner, Rodon, Nimmo, Judge and some RP’s. Very doable after shedding over 100 million this offseason.

    Reply
  21. Echopark

    3 years ago

    For the Dodgers, I don’t like any of the top four FA options because of price in money and years. I think they need to see if the market for Bogaerts (very unlikely) or Swanson (unlikely) comes back to them. Lux is the stop gap. Adames and Rosario might be trade options. Andrus is small comfort 2nd tier FA and I am not sure a better option than Lux.

    My concern is that defense up the middle is going to become only MORE important (if that is even possible) – and especially at 2B – because the shift is going away. So I don’t love Muncy as your everyday 2B. Unsure if Taylor can play a lot of 2B with his elbow – certainly the Dodgers avoided it last year. And while I really look forward to Busch at the plate, reports indicate he is not a guy you want playing 2B on the regular, much less with the shift banned. Maybe need to bring in a Segura at that point to help man 2B?

    Dodgers need two bats. Makes most sense for one of them to be at SS – or if you move Lux to SS – at 2B. Other has to be in OF.

    Tricky for sure.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

  • Top Stories
  • Recent

Astros Promote Brice Matthews

Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow

Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers

Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help

Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays

Yankees Release DJ LeMahieu

Trevor Williams To Undergo UCL Surgery

Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff

Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

Bobby Jenks Passes Away

Braves Release Alex Verdugo

Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

Rangers Option Josh Jung

Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin

Geoff Hartlieb Elects Free Agency

Angels Option Jack Kochanowicz

Trade Deadline Outlook: New York Mets

Sergio Alcántara Elects Free Agency

Blue Jays Select Tommy Nance

Tyler Callihan Likely Done For The Year

Pirates Select Yohan Ramírez, Designate Matt Gorski For Assignment

Astros Promote Brice Matthews

Rays Place Brandon Lowe On Injured List

Mets Designate Rico Garcia For Assignment

MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

Latest Rumors & News

Latest Rumors & News

  • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
  • Luis Robert Rumors
  • Alex Bregman Rumors

 

Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

MLBTR Features

MLBTR Features

  • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
  • Front Office Originals
  • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
  • MLBTR Podcast
  • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
  • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
  • Contract Tracker
  • Transaction Tracker
  • Extension Tracker
  • Agency Database
  • MLBTR On Twitter
  • MLBTR On Facebook
  • Team Facebook Pages
  • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

Rumors By Team

  • Angels Rumors
  • Astros Rumors
  • Athletics Rumors
  • Blue Jays Rumors
  • Braves Rumors
  • Brewers Rumors
  • Cardinals Rumors
  • Cubs Rumors
  • Diamondbacks Rumors
  • Dodgers Rumors
  • Giants Rumors
  • Guardians Rumors
  • Mariners Rumors
  • Marlins Rumors
  • Mets Rumors
  • Nationals Rumors
  • Orioles Rumors
  • Padres Rumors
  • Phillies Rumors
  • Pirates Rumors
  • Rangers Rumors
  • Rays Rumors
  • Red Sox Rumors
  • Reds Rumors
  • Rockies Rumors
  • Royals Rumors
  • Tigers Rumors
  • Twins Rumors
  • White Sox Rumors
  • Yankees Rumors

Navigation

  • Sitemap
  • Archives
  • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

MLBTR INFO

  • Advertise
  • About
  • Commenting Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Connect

  • Contact Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feed

MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

hide arrows scroll to top

Register

Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version