Nov. 17: The Padres formally announced a five-year deal for Suarez, which indeed includes an opt-out after the 2025 season.
Nov. 12: The Padres have made a massive strike to keep one of their top free agents. San Diego is reportedly in agreement with reliever Robert Suarez on a five-year, $46MM guarantee that allows him to opt out after the 2025 campaign. Suarez, a Don Nomura client, had declined a $5MM player option earlier this week.
That was a formality, as he was always likely to land a significant multi-year pact on the open market. Just as the time came for him to potentially speak with other teams, he and the Padres pushed a new deal across the finish line.
The new contract will reportedly pay Suarez $10MM in each of the next three seasons. If he were to opt out after 2025, he’d be leaving $16MM on the table, which breaks down as $8MM salaries in each of the 2026 and 2027 campaigns. There is also some notable annual bonus money available related to games finished, and those incentives kick in whenever Suarez finishes at least 25 games in a season. The bonuses max out at $3MM if he reaches 55 games finished.
Suarez had never played in the majors before this year. The Venezuela native had spent five seasons at Japan’s highest level, working late innings for the Fukuoka Softbank Hawks. The Friars signed him to a two-year deal last winter that allowed him to opt out after the 2022 season, taking a shot on a live arm with a history of success in Japan. The gamble his stuff would play against big league hitters paid off in spades, as he emerged as one of manager Bob Melvin’s top late-inning weapons.
During his first MLB appearance, Suarez walked two batters and hit a third. He failed to record an out and all three runners came around to score. It was a nightmarish debut, but the 31-year-old bounced back in a huge way. From the second day of the season onward, he pitched to a 1.70 ERA through 47 2/3 innings. Suarez punched out an elite 32.4% of batters faced along the way. His 10.1% walk percentage was still a bit higher than ideal, but he had no issue overpowering opponents while brandishing eye-popping stuff.
Suarez averaged 97-98 MPH on his fastball, backed up by an upper-80s changeup that served as his put-away offering. He only picked up one save, but he held 11 leads and worked in high-leverage situations throughout the year. Aside from the Opening Day blip, the only negative in his regular season showing was a two-month absence due to right knee inflammation. His stuff was no worse for wear upon his return in mid-August and the Friars clearly don’t harbor any concerns about his long-term health projection.
The postseason ended on a sour note for both Suarez and the Padres, as he was on the mound for what proved to be a season-ending home run allowed to Bryce Harper in the NLCS. He’d pitched his way out of a number of jams earlier in the playoffs before that dramatic at-bat against Harper, and he finished the postseason with a respectable three runs allowed in nine innings. The power stuff he showed along the way bolstered his market value on the eve of his return trip to free agency, and Suarez now cashes in with one of the best free agent deals for a non-closing reliever.
Suarez becomes the fourth reliever in the past decade to land a five-year guarantee. The previous three — Kenley Jansen, Aroldis Chapman and Edwin Díaz (who inked his deal last week) — each had closing experience and multiple seasons of big league success under their belt. That’s also true of players like Wade Davis, Liam Hendriks, Mark Melancon and Raisel Iglesias — who all bested a $46MM total over four or fewer seasons. Suarez’s track record of one-year dominance in the middle innings perhaps most closely compares to his now-teammate, Drew Pomeranz, who landed $34MM over four years during the 2018-19 offseason after an incredible second half in his platform campaign.
It’s a strong milestone for Suarez and his representatives that also keeps him with the club that gave him his first big league opportunity. He’ll return as a high-leverage piece for Melvin, joining Josh Hader, Luis García and a hopefully healthy Pomeranz in the late-game mix. Meanwhile, the successive early re-signings of Díaz and Suarez remove arguably the two best relievers from this winter’s free agent class.
The specific financial breakdown has yet to be reported. The Friars currently have around $203MM on next year’s books, in the estimation of Roster Resource. Their projected luxury tax ledger sits just shy of $225MM, and Suarez’s deal will add another $9.2MM to that tab. A contract’s luxury tax hit is determined by its average annual value, and the final two years of the deal are still considered guaranteed even though Suarez will have the chance to opt out of the arrangement. The Padres look likely to surpass next season’s $233MM base tax threshold, but ownership and the front office have shown no qualms about doing so in an effort to build one of the best rosters in the National League.
Jon Morosi of MLB.com was first to report Suarez and the Padres were in agreement on a five-year, $46MM deal. Ken Rosenthal of the Athletic reported the specific salary breakdown.
Image courtesy of USA Today Sports.
Bruh too soon
Nice!! Of Suarez and Martinez, I would rather have Suarez back. The pen is now SOLID.
5/65?
I had some feel earlier that somewhere from $8-10 could be what he gets. Not sure about the years at that price though.
I had predicted three years at 30 million but this seems ok
you could still be right, if he has a couple more pretty good establishing years i could see suarez at age 34 leaving that 2 years at 8 per contract on the table, meaning he would have made…
Interesting
Harper approves. All kidding aside, this guy is great. Smart move.
I’m sure this contract and the Diaz one will work out great. RPs definitely aren’t volatile
Rather take my chances with 2 and a half of these.
Yeah. Relievers can definitely be unpredictable. Especially in the post season. Craig Kimbrel. Tommy Kahnle. Yency Almonte. Blake Treinen.
A historically large 5 year contract for a 31 year old RP with a 1 year track record of MLB success? What could go wrong?
Does his arm have typical 31 year old mileage on it? Looked legit this year. Looks like one of AJs better contracts.
Lol
This looks like one of his better contracts?
Relievers simply don’t get 5 year deals without long track records of success. This deal looks very bad to me. Relievers are volatile
You wait for a long track record and they will cost double trending towards triple. Not saying this a great or even good deal. Just that he has done worse. If it was a 3 year deal with no player option I would like it.
But what if its not, then it was a steal. Time will tell.
I’m not saying the contract is definitively doomed, and who knows, maybe it works out very well for SD, but RPs can look great for a year or two and be out of baseball a year or two later. They are the least reliable commodity in baseball, and this one is north of 30 and has less than 50 innings worth of track record at the MLB level.
When did Steven Cohen buy the Padres?
Or is this another Hosmer / Myers signing?
Baseball is flush with cash
Basically Seidler saw how San Diego reacted to a winning team. Games were sold out on a Tuesday. Nothing like that has ever happened to the city. Also, Seidler really isn’t in this for the money. He wants to win. I’m sure he wants to make a profit and he will with full seats, concessions, merch, etc. Padres will be spenders for the foreseeable future.
Hoooooly F this is bad. 5/46 for a 32 year old reliever with no track record?
Lmaaaoooo. How many GMs are ROFL rn? 28? 29?
They’re paying him for ‘24 after Hader most likely leaves to close. As a Padres fan, I have no issue with this.
Uh huh. And how do you know he’ll be good then? Relievers are volatile as hell and he has a 47 inning track record. 0.7 career fWAR. Yiiikes
How do you know he won’t be good in 2024?
How to say you have no clue what a stat means. Mention WAR for a reliever.
Do you know what it means? Think I got pretty well down chief
And how do you know he’ll be bad? Sounds like you’re hoping he is just to prove a point. What if he repeats last year? Its a good risk.
Do you know what league average WAR was for a reliever?
Did you know that all the relievers combined on two teams didn’t add up to 0.7 WAR?
Which 2 teams? Do you know he was like 60th in the NL in FWAr for a RP?
Agreed. Preller will be fired when Soto leaves. He built the best farm system in years and has destroyed it for 1 NLCS.
And he will rebuild by 2024.
Farm will be rebuilt quickly. He’s an talent guru. None of those players, except maybe Abrams, would have helped us in the near future.. I think Gore will end up being a mediocre pitcher tbh. Too much of his mechanics have to be perfect for him to really excel.
dvmin98–
Where is this teams starting pitching depth coming from? Definitely not the farm, since the SP’ prospects are many many years from touching a rotation.
What happens after Darvish’s & Snell’s contracts are up after the ‘23 season? How high can their payroll go? Is this an all-in for ‘23 and sell-off what’s left?
What will be left to sell?
Agree that Preller is an elite amateur talent evaluator, but that realm takes time to accumulate. Really hoping to have some of these questions answered.
Gore is elite and the farm will NOT be rebuilt quickly. Especially now that the Padres are no longer drafting in the top 10 and will have to trade what few prospects they DO have to prop up a contender.
Gore was elite for Padres fan up until they traded him away. How they think that they can rebuilt a system so quickly is beyond me. It takes time to draft, develop and scout. The fact that they cleaned out the system will leave the Padres in a vulnerable spot for the next few years.
There goes the RP market
5 years for a 31 year old reliever ????? Someone is high on their own supply! Take that cell phone out of AJ’s hand, somebody!!!
Pomeranz deal version 2.0
I love Suarez but damn dude, do we really think in 5 years you’ll be happy paying this guy?
Offer him 3 years and $27m. If he does better than that, oh well.
31 year old with one big league season gets $46m as a reliever. Tell me again how Diaz was an overpay?
Well that didn’t take long. The AJ haters are back…these guys are pathetic.
I believe it’s called JEALOUSY!!! Let’s Go Padres!!!
Settle down lol. You guys make the NLCS for the first time in ages and act like you won it all. LOL . It’s risky move and people are entitled to their opinion about it. It’s not hate my guy.
You spelled your name wrong, Bruh…
Houston Asterisks Chumps
Most expensive bullpen in the league…
That goes to the Mets still paying Diaz 100 mil, the most expensive bullpen
Bad deal. Too much $$$ for someone who will get more scouting and looks at the plate.
Exactly. Harper already had the guy figured out. The rest of the league won’t be far behind
The league is way behind Harper.
Money sounds about right. Years is issue. 3 years with option buyout would have been ideal.
Another one bites the Mute.
Big overpay, so many more needs and not much money left. He has 40 MLB innings!.
Saw this one twitter but Suarez was the closer for the Fukuoka Softbank Hawks. Nick Martinez was an SP for the hawks who Preller will probably give a bump in salary to after the opt-out. This is to reunite them with Senga from that same team…
Not much left? Clearly you haven’t been paying attention to the padres owner spending cash. Dude is all in and will continue to spend. There is no cap only a tax which Seidler is clearly willing to pay. Padres will likely carry a 260m payroll or higher this year.
Even talks of them trying to sign degrom.
Been paying attention, they tried hard last year to avoid the luxury tax but getting a player like Soto made going over the tax worth it. I’d be surprised if they spent $30M more this year than last (Doesn’t mean it couldn’t happen), Seidler is the best owner the Padres have ever had, but he doesn’t have the pocket books of Cohen.
No he doesn’t but he is worth 3 billion and the padres have been consistently increasing revenue. The one thing he desires is a championship in san diego. Not sure he will go to 260m but going over the tax isn’t roadblock.
Makes sense given they have no one in the minors to step into the rotation. Morejon has not been what they thought. Thing is, signing DeGrom is risky.
FIVE year deal for basically ONE decent year of performance, let’s see how well that contract ages!! Traded the FARM for Soto and then give a relative unknown a massive five year deal! That one will come back to bite them in the ass!
I think they will extend Soto.
Why?
Locking up the 2024 closer before the market increases, good move.
I like that positive insight.
Mets and Padres always buying first.
Battle to win the off season as begun.
LOL. since when?
Lol at people calling this an overpay. Do you see the list of top relievers still available? Diaz was in a tier of his own. After that there is Jansen, Kimbrel, and maybe Robertson who can close games. Those first 2 are making more than $10m AAV. Suarez is probably a better pitcher than all 3 of those guys at the moment and he is getting under $10m AAV. Also, Suarez will be the padres closer if they can’t sign Hader to an extension (which I’m guessing will be over $100m because of Diaz/Mets).
Yeah I’m sure this deal will age well.
It will be a bargain if he stays healthy and performs. Big ifs but possibly. My issue is the player opt out and 5th year. Padres take all the risk and he gets all the money. Padres love giving those player options.
Sadres will ALWAYS be Dodgers little Redheaded Stepchild!
This is exactly what someone that is sad and pathetic would say lol
Great signing. Bullpens matter. Everyone claiming bad deal should be Marlins fans. You have to spend money on top talent and this guy is an upper level late inning reliever. Stop the overpay nonsense – it costs what is costs and you pay it or lose out. I much prefer to see teams exceed the tax threshold and improve than watch a team play 60 win baseball while stealing money from the teams we all pay to see.
LMAO did the Padres really just sign a 31 year old to a 5 year contract for 9 million a year, a RELIEVER of all positions? There’s a reason this was his first year in the big leagues. Padres gonna Padre
$9 million AAV ties Suarez for 50th all time for a reliever.
legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/le…
Scroll down to relief pitchers
Where’s your context? Everyone of those relievers had a track record. Every single one. Plus $9 million isn’t the market rate for most relievers right now, unless apparently, if you’re Edwin Díaz. And the most important thing. He only had one year of service time! They would have control over him for five years anyways and even if he turns out to be the next Mariano Rivera (which he won’t but for the sake of argument let’s say he will), they would have paid him league minimum for 2 more years. With this contract, he can opt out in 3 years! However you try to spin it, this just doesn’t make any sense
I was wrong about leage minimum. Sorry. My mistake. But I still can’t wrap my head around it.
Aj Preller is a great minor league scout.
I’d take him running my scouting department any day of the week.
But That’s it.
AAV isn’t the issue at all.
It’s 5 years at that AAV for a 31 YO reliever.
$9 million is a little low for setup men this offseason. Look at Montero.
This was shocking. 47.2 career innings and turning 32?
Lol I literally laughed when I saw the years. No track record to speak of. Giving 5 years to any reliever is dumb. But if your going to do it you would think you’d sign someone that has pitched more than 50 innings. How some people can think preller is some genius baseball mind is beyond me.
What’s the list of relievers to ever get a 5 year deal? Who did Preller think was going to offer Suarez that many years that he had to go there?
And with an opt-out to boot!
The bonuses point to the Padres expecting Suarez to be their closer in 2024 and 2025. Best case scenario for the Padres is Suarez pitching so well in 2023-2025 that opting out is an easy decision for him.
After seeing Montero’s deal with the Astros, this seems much more reasonable. Guess that is the direction the market is going for setup men.
Opt-out is the worst part of this contract. The only time a player doesn’t opt out is when you want him to.
But it means you likely got excess value on the contract already and the downside is removed meaning you came out positive
But you’d get even MORE excess value if he opted in! Also, him opting out removes no downside because he only opts out if his contract has surplus value. If his contract has downside then he opts in and this whole conversation becomes meaningless. Ask any team who has ever had a player opt out if they think they came out positive from the opt-out and see what they say. In this particular scenario the Padres definitely didn’t come out positive because they had to pay Suarez more money.
Giving a 5 year deal to a 31 year old reliever sounds like a very bad idea. Relievers are volatile even if they are young, let alone in their mid 30s.