Headlines

  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Padres Open To Trade Offers On Trent Grisham, Ha-Seong Kim

By Anthony Franco | December 29, 2022 at 10:58pm CDT

The Padres have had another significant offseason, adding Xander Bogaerts on an 11-year megadeal and bringing in Matt Carpenter via two-year guarantee. Those players lengthen a lineup that already had plenty of talent, with Bogaerts in particular building on an existing area of strength.

San Diego certainly didn’t need another infielder. Ha-Seong Kim and Jake Cronenworth would’ve made for an effective pairing up the middle, while Manny Machado has third base secured. Fernando Tatis Jr. will be back from his performance-enhancing drug suspension by the end of April and was already expected to see plenty of outfield work in deference to Kim and Cronenworth. As things stand, the Bogaerts signing pushes Kim to second base and Cronenworth over to first while keeping Tatis in the outfield on most days.

That overflow of up-the-middle talent is an enviable “problem” to have, as it affords them the ability to turn to the trade market. To that end, Dennis Lin of the Athletic reports the Padres are open to discussions on both Kim and center fielder Trent Grisham. Lin adds the organization isn’t interested in parting with Cronenworth and suggests a deal involving Grisham might be more likely than one than sends Kim elsewhere.

Grisham has spent the last three years in San Diego. Acquired from the Brewers in the deal that sent Luis Urías and Eric Lauer to Milwaukee over the 2019-20 offseason, he immediately stepped in as the Friars primary center fielder. Grisham had a great first season, collecting 10 home runs and stolen bases apiece with a .251/.352/.456 line while playing in 59 of the 60 games during the shortened 2020 campaign. He looked like a budding star, but his offense has regressed in the past couple seasons.

The lefty hitter put up a .242/.327/.413 slash in 2021, with that production checking in right around league average. He took another step back this past season, posting a .184/.284/.341 mark through 524 trips to the plate. Grisham connected on 17 longballs and walked at a robust 10.9% clip but had the worst batting average of any hitter with at least 500 plate appearances. While there’s some amount of misfortune in the meager .231 average on balls in play he mustered, there were also plenty of worrisome underlying indicators.

Grisham struck out in 28.6% of his plate appearances, the worst clip of his career. Only Randal Grichuk had a lower line drive rate than Grisham’s 13.5% mark (minimum 500 PA’s) and his hard contact percentage was middle-of-the-pack. A left-handed pull hitter, Grisham could stand to benefit somewhat from the forthcoming shift limitations, but it’s not likely to be all that significant a boost unless he trims his strikeouts and/or improves his contact profile.

To his credit, the 26-year-old remained a valuable part of the San Diego lineup even during a disappointing offensive year. Grisham played more than 1100 innings in center field and earned a second career Gold Glove for his work. Defensive Runs Saved credited him as eight runs better than average, while Statcast pegged him as 12 runs above par. Grisham’s glove has been a plus throughout his career, as he combines excellent speed with quality reads and solid arm strength.

Despite the career-worst offensive season, Grisham would have a decent amount of value on the trade market. His defense raises his floor and he’s shown prior glimpses of quality work at the plate. With three seasons of remaining arbitration control and projected by MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz for a modest $2.6MM salary next year, he’d have plenty of appeal in a market starved for quality center field options. There are no remaining free agent center fielders who’d likely play every day on a contender. The trade market is similarly without many obvious candidates. The Royals would listen to offers on Michael A. Taylor and the Twins are known to be open to dealing Max Kepler. Bryan Reynolds requested a trade from Pittsburgh, but the Pirates have maintained they won’t budge off a lofty asking price.

Teams like the Red Sox, Rockies, Rangers, Reds and Marlins are among the clubs that have sought center field help. That’s also true of the Dodgers, though it’s hard to imagine San Diego trading anyone to their chief competitors in the NL West. Lin relays that San Diego has interest in Marlins starter Pablo López and speculates the Friars could look to market Grisham to Miami in a deal for rotation help, though there’s no indication the sides have actually had those discussions to this point.

Kim should have even stronger trade appeal, as he’s coming off a better offensive season. After struggling in his first MLB campaign, the former KBO star hit .251/.325/.383 across 582 plate appearances in year two. Kim picked up 11 homers and 29 doubles while striking out in only 17.2% of his plate appearances. He also stole 12 bases in 14 attempts.

Like Grisham, Kim provides sizable value on the defensive side. Pressed into primary shortstop duty by Tatis’ injuries and suspension, the 27-year-old looked like a Gold Glove-caliber middle infielder. DRS credited him as 10 runs above average in a little less than 1100 shortstop innings, while Statcast estimated him as five runs better than average. Kim had also rated as a plus defender at second and third base during the 2021 campaign.

Upon making the jump from South Korea during the 2020-21 offseason, Kim landed a four-year, $25MM guarantee. He’s due a modest $17MM over the next two seasons (including a buyout on a 2025 mutual option) and is slated to head back to free agency following the ’24 campaign. That’s excellent value for a player coming a season as strong as Kim’s and in his prime years.

As with center field, the middle infield market has dried up considerably at this stage of the offseason. Assuming Carlos Correa finalizes a deal with the Mets, the top remaining free agents are Elvis Andrus and players like Hanser Alberto and José Iglesias. Obvious trade possibilities are again sparse. Players like Amed Rosario, Jorge Mateo or Nick Madrigal could be dealt but aren’t necessarily likely to move. Boston, Atlanta, Minnesota, the Angels and the White Sox are among the teams that could seek out upgrades at one of the middle infield spots.

There’s no urgency for San Diego to deal either Grisham or Kim, of course. Both players are affordable and currently penciled into everyday roles. Padres president of baseball operations A.J. Preller acknowledged as much last week, telling Ken Rosenthal of the Athletic the team’s “intention” was to retain their current position player group thanks to “the flexibility and the versatility it gives our team.” Lin’s report suggests they’re not completely committed to that course of action, though, at least if offered a chance to upgrade elsewhere on the roster.

The back of the rotation is something of a question mark, with Nick Martinez and Seth Lugo slated for the fourth and fifth spots behind Joe Musgrove, Blake Snell and Yu Darvish. Only Musgrove is guaranteed to be around beyond next season; Snell and Darvish will be free agents at the end of the year, and Martinez and Lugo could opt out of their multi-year deals (although only if the team first declines a two-year option in Martinez’s case). The club could also consider ways to upgrade at catcher or add another bat to the corner outfield/first base mix.

The organization’s farm system has thinned considerably in recent seasons as they’ve packaged a lot of their depth for impact trade acquisitions, perhaps leading them to be more amenable to deal from the MLB roster in the right circumstance. Young catcher Luis Campusano would seem to be a candidate for such a move on paper considering his strong prospect pedigree, but Lin relays that trade interest in the 24-year-old isn’t especially strong at this point.

Share 0 Retweet 48 Send via email0

Miami Marlins San Diego Padres Ha-Seong Kim Jake Cronenworth Luis Campusano Pablo Lopez Trent Grisham

Blue Jays, Julian Fernandez Agree To Minor League Deal
Main
The Opener: Padres, Adell, Tigers
View Comments (401)
Post a Comment

401 Comments

  1. kellin

    2 years ago

    Question. Is Kim an upgrade for the Angels and can a trade be made ?

    6
    Reply
    • angelsfan4life

      2 years ago

      To answer your question, nope

      1
      Reply
      • CaptainJudge99

        2 years ago

        BREAKING NEWS: Tatis ringworm is finally in remission.

        4
        Reply
        • Friarguy19

          2 years ago

          Ace, CONSIDER letting it drop, huh?

          10
          Reply
        • CaptainJudge99

          2 years ago

          @Friarsguy19- No way. Are you Tatis doctor? I see how much this is really bothering you. Hey at least YOU have healed him from his condition.

          2
          Reply
    • hiflew

      2 years ago

      Answer. Judgment call. Yes a trade can always be made. There is no such thing as a player that cannot be traded for the right price unless a no trade clause is invoked.

      3
      Reply
      • kellin

        2 years ago

        @hiflew I was just pondering what the asking price for Kim would be, and if its in the Angel’s range.

        1
        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          Look at what the cost was for other 5 WAR players with 2 years of team control. Even if he was available in trade, the Angels don’t have the pieces to make it happen unless they were willing to include Hoppe and Neto.

          2
          Reply
    • Troutahni

      2 years ago

      Kim is definitely an upgrade. I’ve was read the Angels to trade for him ever since the Padres signed Bogarts. He’s a slick fielder whose bat is still improving. Stick him at Ss and Rengigo at 2B and the roster is set for the next couple of seasons. Sign then both before they become free agents.

      A move to get Kim puts the Angels in the playoffs for the first time since 2014.
      Kim would give the Angels the best 1 thru 9 lineup in baseball.

      1. Taylor Ward. LF
      2. Mike Trout. CF
      3. Shohei Ohtani. DH/SP
      4. Anthony Rendon 3B
      5. Hunter Renfro. RF
      6. Brandon Drury. 1B
      7. Luis RengifO 2B
      8. Logon O’Hoppe. C
      9. Ha-Seong Kim. Ss

      Give me a line up with a higher ceiling in MLB that’s better.

      4
      Reply
      • Troutahni

        2 years ago

        Imagine Kim and Ward on base for Mike Trout’s spot in the order in the middle of the game.

        Reply
        • JustaFan 2

          2 years ago

          Imagine Trout not being on the IL for half the season!

          2
          Reply
      • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

        2 years ago

        Mets have a better lineup for sure, even with Kim on the Angels. Padres are better, and the Phillies probably are as well. The Blue Jays had a killer lineup going into opening day 2022. I’m not sure how valid that still is now.

        19
        Reply
      • Henry Silvestre

        2 years ago

        Kim can also lead off vs lefties ..he has a .380 OBP vs lhp..absolutely rakes vs LHP..RHP give him trouble BUT he was in essence a regular rookie (his rookie yr 2021 got inconsistent playing time and dealt with culture Schock

        3
        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          2 years ago

          DTR

          At least we can agree once today, adding Kim would not give Angels a top three lineup.

          2
          Reply
      • David

        2 years ago

        You’d be better with Gio Urshela at 2B than Rengifo.

        3
        Reply
      • baseballfan2801

        2 years ago

        Def not an upgrade imo. I look at it as the same as when they had Andrelron Simmons. Great defensive but the bat doesn’t play to well and doesn’t equate to much

        1
        Reply
      • BillTheThrill10

        2 years ago

        Who you giving up if you’re talking about Angels getting Kim? Cause the Padres aren’t going to give him away for a pack of smokes and a case of beer. Gotta give something to get something, you’re acting like the Padres would just give him to the Angles for a pat on the head and an atta boy. Even in this hypothetical lineup you give, they wouldn’t even have the best lineup in their division let alone baseball. Astros, Mariners and possibly even the Rangers have a better lineup than the Angels. So please, enlighten me.

        8
        Reply
        • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

          2 years ago

          @Bill If Texas adds Reynolds/Kepler/McCarthy/Guriel or anyone with a pulse, maybe they are better. But, at the moment, even an optimist like me wouldn’t say that with a hole in left field and a questionable DH spot when Garver and Heim aren’t both in the lineup.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          BTV says Jose Suarez and Jose Quijada gets it done.

          Reply
        • BillTheThrill10

          2 years ago

          That’s why I said possibly even the Rangers, meaning if they were to continue to add to their roster, they could have a better lineup than the Angels. As of right now, yes it wouldn’t be better. But say they were to add another decent bat or two, then we could argue that they would be better than the Angels.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          2 years ago

          What about the champs’ lineup? While I hate Houston, respect after 22 had to given.

          1
          Reply
      • Walker4daWinn

        2 years ago

        This is hardly a middle of the pack lineup only reason it might crack top ten is trout and ohtani being so darn good. Without them it’s in the 20s but even with Kim ohtani and trout I don’t even think it’s top 10

        In no order
        Braves
        Mets
        Phillies
        Cardinals
        Padres
        Yankees
        Blue jays
        Astros

        8 that are definitely better

        Probably better

        Mariners
        White Sox
        Dodgers

        Probably about the same as
        Orioles
        Rangers

        Do that is about 12-14 and only cause the superior 2 talents in the middle are they better then
        Twins
        Indians
        Rays
        Brewers
        Cubs

        Top 5 cmon

        7
        Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        2 years ago

        Padres
        Mets
        Phillies
        Astros

        A few that are better than that lineup and it would cost the Angels their only to p100 prospect plus more to make that happen. O’Hoppe would be gone from that lineup.

        2
        Reply
      • OJ's White Ford Bronco

        2 years ago

        OJ here. Every offense in MLB is stacked to the Moon. It comes down to pitching and defense. Pitching more so. You have none. I’m just saying….

        1
        Reply
        • cookmeister 2

          2 years ago

          Angels have none? Staff era last year says otherwise

          2
          Reply
        • cookmeister 2

          2 years ago

          This article is literally about the padres being open to trading him..

          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          This article is about another article by Lin that says they are NOT open to trading Kim.

          2
          Reply
        • #1WhiteSoxFan

          2 years ago

          White Sox have an opening at 2B.

          Reply
      • Omarj

        2 years ago

        Kim is definitely obtainable by the Angels, but there’s going to be competition. From the organizational standpoint, by staying conservative they give themselves (front office) a chance to stay on when new ownership takes over (even considering, usually new regimes bring in “their people”). By dealing for Kim, you’re moving a ton of assets to which the Angels don’t have much of. It makes more sense if they get a 6th starter who’s better than Suarez, forcing them to move chips in, and then flip Suarez, Rengifo, and more. But if they give up too much and it doesn’t pan out, then that’ll go against the Angels FO when firings happen, come new ownership.

        Reply
      • GoogleMe

        2 years ago

        I would put Walsh at 1B and Drury at 2nd.

        You have to have a question mark next to Rendon. It’s been 3 years since he has been good and keeping him on the field has been a bit of challenging. I doubt he can be that 150 OPS+ again, but no team has 3 150+ OPS guys if Rendon could be that guy again. The team is definitely loaded with 20+ HR talent . In terms of OPS and HR potential only the Astros are comparable. The Astros cake walked themselves to the championship.last year.

        Reply
      • revpar35

        2 years ago

        Best 1-9 lineup in baseball? LOL.

        1
        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          revpar, You work in the hotel industry?

          Reply
      • put it in the books

        2 years ago

        The last 5 guys in that lineup are junk

        Reply
      • imgman09

        2 years ago

        Braves,Phillies and a few more.Rendon has to reestablish himself after 2 lost years

        Reply
      • BartoloHRball

        2 years ago

        NY Mets

        Nimmo CF
        Correa 3B
        Lindor SS
        Alonso 1B
        McNeil 2B
        Marte RF
        Volgebach / Alvarez DH
        Canha LF
        Navaro C

        That’s borderline ridiculous.

        1
        Reply
        • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

          2 years ago

          I’m rooting for the Mets to take down the evil Scott Boras on this one. I hope he gets < 200 million guaranteed. Still, it's possible another team takes him on because of Kumar Rocker's incident last draft.

          1
          Reply
    • Henry Silvestre

      2 years ago

      5.1 WAR > Trea Turner and only making $7mil..Kim has HUGE value and he is automatic your 3rd best player (WAR) behind Trout and Othani so yes HUGE improvement. Don’t know if KAA has the players we need though

      4
      Reply
      • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

        2 years ago

        @Henry Now, use Fangraphs or some realistic measure of value (not WAR). I don’t even buy the claim his defense is more than slightly above average. His offensive is clearly only a step above based on last year, and he has a below average 95 OPS+ in his career. I’d even trust Baseball Trade Values more than Bref in this case due to defense overshadowing everything. WAR says Semien was better than Juan Soto last year. Convince anyone that and I would be shocked.

        4
        Reply
        • bitterpadresfan

          2 years ago

          Soto was an awful fielder and didn’t hit for the padres. Wouldn’t shock me one bit.

          4
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          Fangraphs is useless when it comes to WAR for position players. They use UZR for the defensive portion of their WAR, which does not take the shift into account at all. When 60% of all LHB face a shift and 30% face an extreme shift, UZR has been worse than useless, it has given an entirely incorrect view of defensive performance.

          Think about it. A SS or 3B is playing in shallow RF. The ball is hit that direction and is not caught by the RF, it’s caught by the infielder. That infielder gets credit for an out of zone catch, the kind that is valued most in that calculation, and the RF is dinged for not making the play because it was in his zone.

          This website uses Baseball Reference for its links for all players for a very good reason, its more accurate.

          Once the extreme shift is gone, then in 3 or 4 years you can go back to using Fangraphs, but for anything that measures performance for the past 12-15 years its Baseball Reference or Baseball Prospectus.

          Baseball Reference, rWAR, and Fangraphs, fWAR, weight defense the same in their calculation. A run saved is equal to a run created.

          The defense for a RF vs a 2B is easy to quantify. 114 chances vs 657 chances. The 2B is involved in nearly 6 times as many plays and effects 7 times as many outs because of double plays.

          Even if both are equally adept at their positions, the defensive production of a 2B comes into play 6-7 times as often as that of the RF.

          In this case, Semien is a very good 2B and Soto is at best an average RF.

          Defense matters.

          6
          Reply
        • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

          2 years ago

          Are you saying that if those two were on 1 year qualifying offer deals that Soto would get the same haul? Let’s be realistic. Also, fangraphs says Seager > Semien last year. Bref says Semien > Seager and Soto At some point, stats need to be replaced with rational thought. Many times, they are helpful; however, some personal judgement has to apply. Many Rangers’ guys are or were defense first guys, so I’m not biased here in that regard.

          1
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          DTR, what are you talking about? You said, “WAR says Semien was better than Juan Soto last year. Convince anyone that and I would be shocked.”

          I showed clearly that Semien was more valuable than Soto LAST YEAR. Try giving rational thought a try some time.

          1
          Reply
        • Ma4170

          2 years ago

          Not as much as you’re making it out to matter. you’d have to put a stuffed pigeon out there at 2b for it to matter as much as WAR implies.

          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          2 years ago

          The Padres got “hosed” in that deal for Soto and Josh Bell.
          Both players struggled offensively to hit even .200 after the big trade.
          If Soto and Bell had performed at just “career average levels”
          then maybe, it is the Padres hoisting the Championship flag instead of the Astros.
          In a few years, the Padres will regret giving up all that talent for just a few years of Soto and 1/2 season of Bell.

          The only thing that could take the sting out of that trade is if the Padres, somehow, win a Championship before Soto’s contract is up.

          Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          2 years ago

          The Soto trade was as much about 2023 and 2024 as 2022

          2
          Reply
        • jamfed

          2 years ago

          I didn’t like any of the prospects the Padres gave up for Soto.

          Reply
      • MarlinsFanBase

        2 years ago

        @Henry Silvetre

        Thank you for once again proving how garbage a stat WAR is.

        7
        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          MFB, Thank you for proving once again how little you understand baseball.

          2
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          @websoulsurfer

          Yeah, thank you for letting me know that my time playing all the way to Division I made me learn nothing about the game and how you clearly know the game more than I do from your experience in video games and fantasy leagues.

          5
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          @websoulsurfer

          I’d be curious to know ho we’d both do on a baseball field since you clearly know more than I do.

          3
          Reply
        • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

          2 years ago

          Here is another one: If you trust the trade market to fairly evaluate value, consider that Reynolds and Grisham both have the same number of years left (3), and both were within 0.3 WAR of each other. Would you bet your salary on Grisham getting anywhere near what Reynolds gets in a trade? Defense matters, but offense is just much more valuable, even in the analytics era. Simmons has hopped around clubs looking for a job in spite of his WAR.

          2
          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          How long until websoulsurfer logs onto one of his other 5 accounts to agree with himself?

          5
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          @DeGrom Texas Ranger

          I’ve got one that is personally funny for me.

          Ha-Seong Kim = Brandon Nimmo at 5.1 WAR

          And both > Trea Turner

          Phillies vastly overpaid!

          Mets overpaid!

          Padres getting a bargain!

          3
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          @thelegendaryharambe

          He did forget which screen name he was using when he was responding to this debate.

          2
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          LMAO. Right. Sure. You continually show so little knowledge of the game that to even try to claim you played through D1 is laughable.

          If you ever say anything that makes sense, then I will listen to you with something other than a laugh. Until then I will rely on the 31 years that I have spent getting paid for my knowledge of the game of baseball.

          Here is a clue that you are pulling a Santos when it comes to your claims about your background. WAR is used by every single major league team in helping to make personnel decisions. They go beyond the WAR used on Fangraphs or Baseball Reference because they have access to data that public sources don’t, but they ALL use some form of WAR. Since it is so important to the teams, why don’t you have any clue about the value of the stat?

          2
          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          @websoulsurfer No one on here believes you have ever been paid a single cent for your so-called “knowledge of the game of baseball.”

          5
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          I am 63 years old. My playing days are 40 years in the past with the last of them on the minor league fields in Bakersfield.

          1
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          Not hard to understand. Turner and Nimmo both played below league average defense and Nimmo hit much better.

          1
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          @websoulsurfer

          Being a telemarketer for ticket sales does not count as baseball knowledge.

          If you want, let’s exchange knowledge of how the game is played on the field. I’d love to show you my knowledge of playing the game so you’ll clearly see that I know the game in ways who didn’t learn in your 2-year Rec-League career that very likely ended in 10U that I can base on the lack of baseball knowledge you display.

          Let’s see…what do you want to talk about? Approaches at the plate? Cuts on the field? Fundamentals? Hitting certain pitches? I’m game for any. Or can’t you have this discussion because Excel, Access, Brian Kinney and Bill James don’t know enough about those discussions to let you know?

          3
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          @websoulsurfer

          OK, I’m calling you out.

          While I agree that Turner and Nimmo suck on defense, let’s talk about what we both see was their flaws. What did you see?

          And for Kim, what did you see he did right with his defense and what did he struggle with at the plate?

          I played infield through high school and utility in Division I, so I know the positions.

          Let’s talk, genius.

          3
          Reply
        • Billy Baroo

          2 years ago

          WSS, consistently abrasive and wrong and lying about his baseball background, regardless of forum.

          2
          Reply
        • Billy Baroo

          2 years ago

          He used to claim to have been a scout.

          2
          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          And to make 7 figures and to have pitched in D1 and to have a realtor sister who sold Freddy Galvis a house in San Diego and that Joey Lucchesi was his wife’s cousin’s kid and that he randomly sat next to Dan Lozano (Manny Machado’s agent) on a plane a day or two before Machado to the Padres broke and that Lozano personally told him that Machado was signing with the Padres and also to have seen A. J. Preller out in the wild multiple times.

          3
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          @Billy Baroo

          The funny part is that he/she is so uninformed about baseball that he/she doesn’t realize that he/she shows the level of baseball he/she knows and doesn’t know.

          Based on the discussion and debate, I have been able to guess that, if he/she ever played baseball, it was no further than 10u Rec League. Not MiLB, College, High School Varsity, High School JV or even Travel League. And very likely not even 12u Rec League. That’s why I get a kick out of some posters like that. They yap about baseball and how guys like me don’t know baseball when we actually played, but then their yapping reveals what they really don’t know.

          I’d love for him/her to engage me in this discussion about baseball on-the-field stuff. I’ll humiliate this fool and expose his/her very little, if any, baseball experience – that’s probably limited to video games and fantasy leagues.

          3
          Reply
        • Ma4170

          2 years ago

          It’s actually that way with some of the park adjustment factors and assumptions too. Canha 122 OPS+ last year, Trea Turner 121. Sure, go look at their seasons in detail and tell me how that even sniffs reality.

          1
          Reply
        • Buuba ho tep

          2 years ago

          Funny with all the fake trolls on the internet who lie…the only thing they do is keeping those fingers trolling trolling trolling. By do people need to be idiots. Nice conversations going on. Don’t need any trolls

          Reply
        • BaseballisLife

          2 years ago

          Why do you feel it necessary to lie Marlins fan? You have said before that you were nothing but a fan, but to try to win an argument suddenly you played D1 ball? Give it a rest.

          If you knew the game as well as you claim, you would know that the teams use WAR, the guys working for the teams are smarter than us and know the game better than we do, and you would be working to gain a greater understanding of stats like WAR.

          Reply
        • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

          2 years ago

          War is a psuedointellectual stat. Analysts can’t even agree how many hits player x lost due to the shift or how many runs the shift saved. How can you then possibly expect WAR to be useful when it is based on individual models? I would say stats like OPS, fielding percentage, stolen base rates, K rates, BB rates, GIDP, runs, and other metrics should be weighted considerably more than WAR alone because WAR isn’t agreed upon by all models and is just like a line of best fit for age and salary for instance. Take this for what you will (you can mock me or believe me if you want or not), but I have a degree in Finance from Johns Hopkins. That hardly helps me with investing my own money or doing my job at a bank. I’m hardly even out of college, so don’t dismiss me as some caveman. I’m just a realist surrounded by many psuedointellectuals.

          2
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          @BaseballisLife

          I’m not lying and this isn’t the first time I’ve mentioned my past of having played into Division I. And I’ve never hidden that I sucked when I played at that level. It happens.

          As for WAR, sorry, but there are so many examples of that being a flawed stat. Very flawed stat.

          nd FYI….those teams using WAR are signing Trea Turner for a lot more money than Brandon Nimmo and Ha-Seoung Kim who had higher WAR than him this past season, but everyone with a brain knows who was the better player of the three this past year…and it wasn’t even close. Which is why he gets paid what he does, Nimmo will never get that slaray, and neither will Kim.

          2
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          Thank you @DeGrom Texas Ranger

          I get a kick at these guys that defend WAR and question people’s baseball knowledge when they point out how flawed and garbage it is. And ignore that the guys who are getting paid aren’t getting paid because of their WAR when you look at salary comparisons between Trea Turner with Nimmo and Kim who had a higher WAR. And the fact that any idiot can see who the better player of the three are – the one that had the lowest WAR of the three.

          I remember there were some idiots making the same statements as these idiots years ago in favor of Jason Heyward and Juan Lagares over Miguel Cabrera.

          2
          Reply
        • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

          2 years ago

          That Heyward contract and the McCann contract that MLB Network was religiously praising both turned out poorly. I love seeing teams overpay for defense only guys and then end up severely regretting it. Similar things can be said of Will Myers, Eric Hosmer, and countless others. On this note, I hate the Semien contract. I get that people love WAR, but nobody in the right mind would pay him more than Seager, and the market showed it. Of course, Semien got way more that I thought he should, but even the same team values WAR lowly. Even Tampa Bay gave Longoria a long contract extension they never cared to give to Crawford, Zobrist, Fuld, Joyce, and countless others. They are literally one of the most analytical clubs ever. Oakland (Moneyball team) gave its largest contract to Chavez, not Donaldson, Semien, or Chapman. Think about that for a second if you think analytics should be a primary source of valuation. If all 30 teams think lowly of WAR and use it as maybe a 3rd or 4th source, maybe people should come back down to planet Earth and stop thinking they are smarter than all 30 GMs AND their front offices combined. Even the guy on Fangraphs says projecting seasons using WAR is idiotic. People often misuse stats in ways their developers never intended and pretend to know more than the inventors. The hubris here is absurd.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          @MarlinsFanBase BaseballIsLife is one of websoulsurfer’s burners. I told you he would do that.

          2
          Reply
        • Billy Baroo

          2 years ago

          Doesn’t even change the way he writes when he switches accounts.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          He is the scorpion and we are all the turtle

          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          @Billy Baroo and @MarlinsFanBase now he is claiming he and his so-called wife were sitting next to A. J. Preller and Scott Boras at some fancy shmancy restaurant in Newport Beach last night lol.

          mlbtraderumors.com/2023/01/carlos-correas-camp-in-…

          1
          Reply
    • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

      2 years ago

      I thought the Yankees should have traded for Kim last off-season and he definitely should be traded now because his value is maximized at the shortstop position. The Angels are a great fit for Kim and any team that’s needs elite shortstop defense coupled with a serviceable batting tool. The Padres should get a haul for him. And his talents would be wasted if he was forced to play 2B for the Padres, they need to do him a favor and trade him.

      2
      Reply
      • Javia135

        2 years ago

        How long do you think before Kim is starting at SS and Bogaerts is starting at 2B?

        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          Javia, More likely that Machado opts out and Bogaerts moves to 3B.

          3
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          Cronenworth is their best 2B. Kim super utility. If Manny opts (I doubt he will) then yeah Bogey to 3B

          I also wouldn’t count out Tatis in the IF, not so much this year but 2024 onward

          5
          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          Unless Manny gets injured or sucks in 2023 I don’t see how he forgoes the opt out entirely. Good chance the Padres extend him before the opt-out date but a whole bunch of dudes who have accomplished less than him and are about the same age as him just got double (or close to) what he would be opting into if he did opt in. I already know people are going to bring up AAV but he already demonstrated a preference for term/guarantee over AAV the first time he was a free agent and he has more to gain from a longer term contract at age 31 than he did at age 26.

          4
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          Seidler has been consistently saying he will extend Manny, and M says he loves SD, so I’m taking that for what it is. The Pads will have to be very generous I would think, to keep from testing his worth elsewhere. I doubt Miami would be a player if he did opt out.

          5
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          2 years ago

          Machado will opt out if he is not first extended, but I believe 90 percent that they will reach a deal to extend him.

          Soto on the other hand will go to free agency unless he sucks in 2023 and the Padres still offer a boatload of money. Even though Soto is much younger than Judge, he regressed enough in 2022 that I think he might “only” get a Judge-like or Trea-like deal, whereas at one time, it seemed he would top them all by a wide margin.

          6
          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          Player still has to sign off on any extension and Machado has to say he loves SD but I’d definitely take him signing with the Padres over any other individual team.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          2 years ago

          How long do you think before Kim is starting at SS and Bogaerts is starting at 2B?
          ====================
          One month.

          Reply
        • Brew88

          2 years ago

          Not sure what Melvin is going to do with this Rubics Cube problem he’s inherited by the acquisition of Bogaerts, but I would hope the team doesn’t forget that Cronenworth is an AS 2B and not push him off of 2B to accommodate Bogaerts, which means Kim is more likely to be pushed to utility role, or only start at 2B/SS when a tough RH pitcher isn’t on the mound, which is about half the season. Against tough RH pitchers, Crozone slides back to 2B from 1B, but I don’t know who plays first in that scenario, it’s either Carpenter or a player not yet on the team.

          3
          Reply
      • HawkCharger

        2 years ago

        Thank you for having a comment that is actually relevant to the post, Ig SOB.

        1
        Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      2 years ago

      Huge upgrade for the Angels. No a trade can’t be made because the Padres have said they are not trading Kim.

      3
      Reply
    • stansfield123

      2 years ago

      Kim was a 5 WAR player last year. If he sticks with that (and there’s no reason why he wouldn’t, he did it by being an all around good player, he didn’t do anything super special with the bat), he’s an upgrade for almost every team.

      2
      Reply
      • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

        2 years ago

        ICYMI: I found this speculative piece on low risk/high reward trade candidates from Bleacher Report quite interesting …I hope MLBTR doesn’t mind me posting

        bleacherreport.com/articles/10059863-low-risk-high…

        Reply
  2. MattyD 2

    2 years ago

    Grisham would be a good fit in Yankee Stadium

    3
    Reply
    • Poster formerly known as . . .

      2 years ago

      I don’t follow the Padres, so I don’t know what happened to his bat in 2022, but if he could regain his hitting chops to go with his elite defense, he’d be a great addition. Trouble is, the bat has a long way to go.

      4
      Reply
      • Curly Was The Smart Stooge

        2 years ago

        Hicks 2.0

        3
        Reply
        • Poster formerly known as . . .

          2 years ago

          If the bat stays where it is, yeah — except he’s a far better fielder than Hicks.

          As things stand, they might as well give left field to Oswaldo. Cashman needs to get over his terror of letting young players prove themselves.

          3
          Reply
      • Herc33

        2 years ago

        The short answer is Grisham was way too passive and his plate discipline is a double-edged sword. He almost never chases balls out of the zone and walks a lot, but he also takes tons of called strikes and strikes out a lot. Percentage-wise he only swings ~38% of the time, which is one of the lowest rates in the league.

        From watching a ton of his at bats last year, how this typically plays out is he’s behind in the count a lot. He digs himself a hole and then hits a lot of grounders/makes weak contact because of it.

        My theory on why he hit better in the playoffs is because it was make it or break it time and he had to be more aggressive. I want SD to keep him because I think he can produce again with some adjustments, plus he got shifted a ton last year and should benefit from that going away.

        9
        Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          His hitting mechanics are very sound, it’s as you say, his passive approach. At some point he will improve as a hitter. That is aSsuming his funk isn’t physical (eyesight for example).

          What I don’t understand is the basis for this article. I don’t see any sources quoted about the Pads considering trades for Kim and Grish. I guess it’s always a possibility, but such a long article about the mere notion is puzzling…

          6
          Reply
        • Poster formerly known as . . .

          2 years ago

          Then he might benefit from Yankee hitting coach Dillon Lawson’s philosophy: “Hit strikes hard.”

          3
          Reply
        • Herc33

          2 years ago

          @Brew I’m guessing it came from an article in the Athletic by Dennis Lin today about the possibility of trading these two. In there it talked about how Preller has received inquiries on them, but he’s downplayed the possibility of trading them and says he wants to play the group that he has now together. It then says, “Industry sources, however, have indicated that San Diego is open to discussing either player — Grisham, in particular.”

          7
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          CN, you hit that right on the money. His P/PA were 10% higher than league average and his strikes looking is 50% higher than league average.

          2
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          @CN I read the Lin article, it was just Lin speculating on how the Pads get a SP via trade, no source from Padres. A GM is always open to discussing trade options, so that alone is not a story.

          6
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          The article said the Padres said they were not considering trading Kim at all.

          But the unnamed industry source somehow trumps both what the Padres have said and common sense, so we have this article?

          3
          Reply
    • Seamaholic

      2 years ago

      So’s the centerfielder they traded for last year.

      3
      Reply
  3. CaptainJudge99

    2 years ago

    Are these the moves you make when your star player gets ringworm?

    6
    Reply
    • burnt_reynolds

      2 years ago

      Hahahahaha good one hahahaha

      4
      Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      2 years ago

      This your this ringworm post today? Tatis deserves the ribbing but we should only have to read it once.

      7
      Reply
  4. Javia135

    2 years ago

    Let the ridiculous trade suggestions begin! Kim and Grisham for which failed prospects or which former stars now being overpaid?

    10
    Reply
    • aspenner27

      2 years ago

      How about Eric Lauer for Kim?

      2
      Reply
      • Javia135

        2 years ago

        Kim has 3 times the value of Lauer.

        1
        Reply
        • Curly Was The Smart Stooge

          2 years ago

          We talkin’ Matt or Eric?
          Matt offers morning coffee…

          6
          Reply
    • Poster formerly known as . . .

      2 years ago

      Kim and Grisham for Bobby Bonilla.

      4
      Reply
    • rct

      2 years ago

      Kim and Grisham for Greg Bird and Shane Spencer. Who says no???

      1
      Reply
      • rct

        2 years ago

        Or how about Kim and Grisham for Alex Ochoa and Benny Agbayani???

        2
        Reply
        • Poster formerly known as . . .

          2 years ago

          Agbayani once handed a ball to a fan, thinking there were three outs. There were only two, and the two baserunners scored.

          You gotta get more than Kim and Grisham in trade for a nice guy like that.

          4
          Reply
        • rct

          2 years ago

          @Fink Ployd: I remember watching that game live! I think it was Gary Thorne and Ralph Kiner calling it on the old Fox Sports NY station. Weirdly enough, I just found out it’s Benny’s birthday today.

          1
          Reply
        • Poster formerly known as . . .

          2 years ago

          Wow! Jung would call that synchronicity — but I call it far-freakin’-out!

          Reply
    • gorav114

      2 years ago

      Yanks trade Clint Frazier for Grisham and Kim /s

      2
      Reply
      • Joe says...

        2 years ago

        Who is Clint Frazier?

        1
        Reply
        • gorav114

          2 years ago

          He was still Clint with the Yankees!

          Reply
    • Brew’88

      2 years ago

      @Javia. If we all go read the Athletic article by Lin, we learn that the Padres actually did not say they were open to trading Kim and Grisham. The Lin article is pure fantasizing by Lin (in a “how do they acquire a pitcher” sort of way).

      MLBTR then inexcusably gives this story legs by making it sound like the Padres publicly voiced interest in trading these guys. It generates discussion I guess, but this is not a source-based rumor, it’s pure fabrication.

      6
      Reply
      • Poster formerly known as . . .

        2 years ago

        MLB.com repeated the story:

        mlb.com/news/mlb-rumors-trades-and-signings?t=trad…

        Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          We call it compounding misinformation. Which is why it’s important to read the Lin story to understand how baseless the trade rumors are

          5
          Reply
        • Poster formerly known as . . .

          2 years ago

          To each his own, but reading a speculative article by a blogger isn’t important enough to me that it tempts me to shell out coin to get behind their paywall. Happily, a conscientious guy like you served the community by passing on the info for free. Thanks for that.

          2
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          If I were to speculate on a trade by Pads for a SP (as Lin did) it would not include giving up a starting OF. Such a deal leaves an already thin OF with a massive hole. Is a SP worth opening the season with an OF of Azocar, a minor leaguer, and Soto? No one is ready from minors either. So no chance they trade Grish, unless they get an OF (or two) in return.

          If they trade for a SP they’ll need to part with prospects, and they don’t have many of high market value.

          I prefer that they sign a FA pitcher but they may not have the $

          5
          Reply
        • Poster formerly known as . . .

          2 years ago

          Cashman traded quite a few arms to get Montas, three to be exact, and another to get Bader. I don’t see the Yankees having a pitching surplus to trade from, even if they did want to gamble on Grisham finding his stroke. Not the kind of arms the Pads would likely want anyway.

          1
          Reply
    • differentbears

      2 years ago

      Gleyber Torres for Kim and Grisham, but the Padres gotta pay 90% of their salaries and San Diego agrees to forfeit Game 1 if they both end up in the Series.

      2
      Reply
  5. Cubensis of Saturn

    2 years ago

    Ha-seong Kim to LAD for River Ryan?

    1
    Reply
  6. Saint Nick

    2 years ago

    I cant imagine anybody wanting Grisham but Lil Kim should hold appeal. Twins maybe?

    2
    Reply
    • stymeedone

      2 years ago

      Grisham to the Marlins for a pitching prospect.

      1
      Reply
      • Javia135

        2 years ago

        The Padres would trade Grisham for an MLB starting pitcher but not a pitching prospect.

        5
        Reply
      • Curly Was The Smart Stooge

        2 years ago

        Are you baiting the Marlins?

        1
        Reply
        • Javia135

          2 years ago

          I know the Marlins need a CF. Are they looking for a SS as well? I know Grisham isn’t worth any of the Marlins quality starters by himself. I suppose the Padres COULD trade both Grisham and Kim to the Marlins for Luzardo or Lopez, but then they would need a new OF and a new 2B. They would be better off just signing Cueto and keeping Kim and Grisham.

          5
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          @Javia135

          Perhaps a Grisham and Kim trade for Lopez and Rojas (Padres paying Rojas’ full salary).

          Reply
        • Javia135

          2 years ago

          I would rather the Padres just signed Cueto, but Preller might do it. Have Ng give him a call.

          3
          Reply
        • Jimbo_Jones

          2 years ago

          @javia135 I totally agree. What about Michael wacha? I don’t know much about him

          2
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 years ago

          Curly- Hook, line and sinkerball!

          Reply
    • Seamaholic

      2 years ago

      Grisham is the best defensive outfielder in baseball. Given how many fly balls are hit these days, maybe the best defensive player period.

      5
      Reply
      • Saint Nick

        2 years ago

        Michael Harris has entered the chat.

        4
        Reply
        • Curly Was The Smart Stooge

          2 years ago

          I saw Harris throw a strike to home plate twice last year, from deep center. I haven’t seen Grisham play, but he’s got a lot to overcome Harris as the new standard for CF, offensively & defensively.

          4
          Reply
        • User 401527550

          2 years ago

          I watched Harris completely whiff on a ball to the wall that was easily catchable. He as ranked as the 8th best cf by metrics last year. Michael Taylor more then doubled his DRS as a center fielder last year.

          Reply
        • Saint Nick

          2 years ago

          Hmm it’s almost like Harris only played a portion of the season.

          Reply
        • User 401527550

          2 years ago

          114 games played is a nice portion. In know that must seem like a significant drop from the 124 Taylor played.

          Reply
      • Sunday Lasagna

        2 years ago

        @seamaholic how many runs did Grisham cost the Padres when he was in the batters box? Saving runs on defense is nice, but not if you cost your team more runs than you save by not being able to hit. He’s not worth a major league SP in a trade. At best he’s worth a prospect, a lottery ticket.

        2
        Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          2 years ago

          Based on the comments about Grisham’s defense, he should hire Jason Heyward’s agent.

          2
          Reply
        • Samuel

          2 years ago

          WampumWalloper;

          I think if he Padres wanted to trade Grisham they should have done it by now. For the reasons you stated.

          He’s a good field / no hit CF. Many teams were looking for CF D this offseason, and had enough O to carry a Bellinger, etc. But those teams have since gotten their CF’s. Not sure if there’s any team in the market for one now.

          As for ML starting pitchers…..it depends. Neither he and/or Kim are going to bring back a good one. First off established starting pitchers are in demand, and second with the salaries for decent starting pitchers on pre-2022-offseason contracts the player price for getting one in trade has gone up quite a bit.

          I was reminded that Cleveland might trade Zach Plesac or Aaron Civale before the 2023 season starts. Both of those guys are established, but need to be reworked. Cleveland doesn’t need a SS or a defensive CF (they have an excess of both). But the point is that’s the sort or return the Padres can expect. Doubt that anyone will trade them a solid #3 starter either under 6 year control or locked into a multi-years contract at pre-2022 rates…..and I like Kim.

          2
          Reply
        • jimbobsjorts

          2 years ago

          I very much doubt your assessment is correct. The Padres don’t need a lottery ticket, so wouldn’t even discuss the possibility if that was all that was being offered. If they can’t package Grisham and a prospect for a major league SP then they’ll simply hold onto him. I do wonder whether they are offering Grisham plus Campy in deals, as Campy doesn’t seem to be in favour.

          4
          Reply
  7. In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

    2 years ago

    I don’t understand the appeal in players with very little offensive value (OPS or average for those of you who look at that) with defensive value. Eli White just got DFA’d. I think guys like this are bench guys and defensive replacements, but they shouldn’t be regulars unless there is a position of designated fielder (not designated pitcher, which we have).

    3
    Reply
    • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

      2 years ago

      To be clear, I mean Grisham for the most part, though Kim’s WAR is bloated by defense, just like Varsho’s.

      Reply
      • JPopp9

        2 years ago

        I think Grisham would be the perfect player to finish off the OF heading in to the season. No stats to back up my opinion. Just eye test and gut feeling. Old school baseball style evaluation.

        2
        Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        2 years ago

        Varsho has talent as a fielder and as a batter. Moreno was a huge price but the Blue Jays acquired a star.

        8
        Reply
      • Seamaholic

        2 years ago

        Defense is kinda important?

        9
        Reply
        • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

          2 years ago

          @Seam Defense is something, but not with Eli White-type numbers. Grisham may be a bit better, but it’s like teams almost ignore offensive shortcomings for defense. I’d divide defensive runs saved by 2 because different sites have different values and I don’t see a good correlation between fielding percentage or range and DRS.

          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          That is because fielding percentage is based on an opinion from a home team employee. No one that understands the game uses fielding percentage anymore because its subjective.

          Since you obviously don’t understand them, a good starting point would be learning how they calculate DRS and OAA.

          1
          Reply
      • Sunday Lasagna

        2 years ago

        @deGrom, I agree, not sure why these guys who can’t produce at the plate are seen with so much value. Grisham would be very valuable in an alternate baseball universe. A baseball universe resembling football. A starting defense that never comes to the plate, a lineup of DH’s that never take the field and pitchers that never face a batter more than once in a game. Unlimited substitutions and players re-enter the game at any time. No lineups, teams just keep sending the best available hitter that isn’t on base up to the plate. Grisham would be the Defensive Player of the Year……..but in this universe, he’s just a great glove, no bat player who might be costing his team more runs than he is saving. Baseball teams are better off without the Gallo’s, Grisham’s etc

        2
        Reply
        • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

          2 years ago

          @Wampum Almost up voted the comment until I read the thing about Gallo… see comment below

          Reply
        • Sunday Lasagna

          2 years ago

          Ok, agreed deGrom, Gallo did produce as a Ranger

          1
          Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        2 years ago

        You can’t bloat WAR with defense. A run saved is worth a run scored in terms of winning games. That is not up for debate or discussion. It is the basic fact of the game.

        Kim was an above league average hitter. He is not a liability with the bat. On top of that he is one of the best SS in baseball on defense.

        1
        Reply
        • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

          2 years ago

          You are being absurd. It is entirely up for discussion how many runs once saves and how many runs one produces. You cannot possibly know what happens on all plays with an average fielder vs this guy. Even with hits lost due to the shift, some say Seager lost 20 and others say 25. Who in the world can be sure? Even these are rounded and based on weighted amounts (50% chance of a hit becoming a hit is a +.5 etc). Stats don’t replace common sense. Let me say this about all the psuedo-intellectual stuff on here: I am probably no different than most guys in baseball analytics when it comes to math ability and degree. The difference is that I work at a bank. However, intellect doesn’t replace common sense. You can value an over the counter option using different valuation models. These models are always different. One says a security is worth 567,686 and another says 673,454. Do we trust site 1 or site 2? You are literally trying to do the same thing as valuing exotic options and saying” this one is definitely worth 567,686. Nobody can possibly argue against that.” Think before you say something that foolish and bold. At least be right about absolutes like that. Also, I am not legitimizing this absurd conversation about defensive runs saved being equal to offense because you are likely looking for attention, so this is my last post.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          2 years ago

          Obviously a run saved equals a run scored. The tricky part is in quantifying what level of production in what context equals a run saved or a run scored.

          2
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          You said all that nonsense in response to a basic fact of the game. Incredible. You simply have no clue about baseball. That is sad.

          1
          Reply
        • Ma4170

          2 years ago

          There’s subjectivity in judging whether one person would have saved a run over another in the exact same situation based on how they do in other situations. Many assumptions being made based on trends. Which of course ignores the read they get off the bat, the jump on the ball off the IF dirt or grass, the sun, their energy levels that day, the IF positioning by the coaches, etc etc etc.
          Where an RBI is an RBI, a HR is a HR
          They do a good job trying to approximate it, but it’s far from a perfect science

          Reply
    • Mystery Team

      2 years ago

      People put way too much weight on defense for some reason. Name me one team that would take the better defender over the better bat. You can’t because they don’t exist. Those teams only exist in comment sections not in the real world. I also agree that any stat that mixes offensive and defensive results is simply a way to skew numbers it’s how guys like Joey Gallo get $11M when he’s realistically worth about $2M.

      1
      Reply
      • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

        2 years ago

        @Mystery Team Hold on. Gallo had 2 all star seasons, with a .869 season as a Ranger in 2021 and a .986 OPS in 2019. .986!!! This is kind of 45 percent higher than average OPS (not exactly, but some kind of combined average of OBP and SLG). He was a much better runner that people thought he would be based on steals and baserunning, once going 15 for 16 in steals in the minors. If you are old-fashioned and only care about batting average, I don’t have much. However, he has a 116 OPS+ during his time in Texas. That is nothing like Grisham. Even then, homeruns are an old school stat.

        2
        Reply
      • Poster formerly known as . . .

        2 years ago

        “Name me one team that would take the better defender over the better bat.”

        Since you ask, I don’t think the Red Sox brought back Jackie Bradley Jr. because they thought he would rake.

        5
        Reply
        • fivepoundbass

          2 years ago

          @Fink Martin Maldonado also comes to mind. Granted, nobody would expect that offensive production to keep a job as a LF or 1B.

          2
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          2 years ago

          Good point, although the Red Sox partly acquired Bradley for Renfroe to get the two Brewers prospects included in the deal.

          1
          Reply
      • small_market_chub

        2 years ago

        Haha amazing comment, so much to work with!

        Teams don’t simply choose beTtEr bAT over dEFeNsE, they are looking for the best all around fit for their team. You’re essentially saying all teams would chose a CF with a wRC+ of let’s say 115 but is a huge liability defensively over a CF with a 97 wRC+, but is an elite defender.

        “Any stat that mixes offensive and defensive results is simply a way to skew numbers”
        Haha what? You’re right, WAR is stupid and no one uses it! /s

        The point on Gallo, you say he was overpaid but also say the stats that prove it are pointless, yet they somehow over represented his value because they include defense? Wild!!

        Welcome to the MLBTR comment section, folks!

        4
        Reply
      • fivepoundbass

        2 years ago

        Agree MT, WAR discipleship does this to people.

        1
        Reply
      • holecamels35

        2 years ago

        What I don’t understand either is the numbers fluctuate from year to year and realistically how many situations do you encounter per game, per season, where your fielder absolutely sucks and botches the play, or if your fielder was faster it would save a run. You can’t catch a ball that’s out the park, you can only cover so much ground.

        1
        Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        2 years ago

        Nearly every team has a glove only starter. There are glove only infielders in the HOF.

        1
        Reply
        • fivepoundbass

          2 years ago

          @web Have any of them been elected since WWII?

          Reply
  8. benhen77

    2 years ago

    Kim to Twins?

    2
    Reply
    • SanDiegoTom

      2 years ago

      For sonny gray?

      Reply
      • benhen77

        2 years ago

        Might take more to get Kim, but I’d be happy with Gray for Kim straight up.

        Reply
  9. hiflew

    2 years ago

    Shouldn’t these offers have been taken BEFORE everyone knew you basically HAD to move them? They will be lucky to get 25 cents on the dollar from any team.

    2
    Reply
    • Javia135

      2 years ago

      @hiflew
      Both of these guys are slated to start for the Padres in 2023. Why, exactly, do you think the Padres HAVE to move them?

      11
      Reply
      • hiflew

        2 years ago

        Because they have both been replaced by better players from the FA market. Do you really think they gave Bogaerts an 11 year deal to play out of position or sit on the bench behind Kim? And moving Kim to 2B diminishes his best ability, defense.

        2
        Reply
        • Javia135

          2 years ago

          Grisham is the Padres starting CF, Kim is their starting 2B. Neither has been replaced.

          7
          Reply
        • hiflew

          2 years ago

          And what happens when Tatis comes back? You have to think ahead.

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          2 years ago

          Who plays outfield other than Soto, Tatis and Grisham?

          If they trade Kim, they can play Jake at 2B, Xander at short, Manny at 3B.

          3
          Reply
        • Javia135

          2 years ago

          Tatis plays LF or RF. Soto plays the other corner. The only other OFs on the roster are Grisham and Azocar. Azocar is NOT a starter. Also, who plays 2B for Kim? NEITHER PLAYER HAS TO BE MOVED. They are both starters.

          9
          Reply
        • hiflew

          2 years ago

          Good luck to you then.

          Reply
        • Samuel

          2 years ago

          ” Lin relays that San Diego has interest in Marlins starter Pablo López and speculates the Friars could look to market Grisham to Miami in a deal for rotation help, though there’s no indication the sides have actually had those discussions to this point.”

          Javia135;

          These article are nothing rewrites of nothing.

          The Marlins are not trading Lopez for a good field / no hit CF. In fact, the reason they’re thinking about trading one of their starters is to improve their O. Sure, the Padres would have to attach more, but throw in Kim with Grisham and the Marlins are still not making that move…and as you point out – the Padres intend to use both of them in key roles.

          These articles the past week or so are really reaching.

          2
          Reply
        • fivepoundbass

          2 years ago

          @hiflew I would agree, but we thought Tatis would come back last year. Nothing is guaranteed

          Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          @Samuel you got it! These articles are nothing rewrites of nothing, as I stated above. I actually read the Lin article, it’s pure speculation ( by Lin, not the Pads) as to how the Pads would acquire a SP.

          The title of this article is mere further fabrication by mlbtr to garner chat.

          If there is one thing the Pads need as much as another SP it’s an OF. They certainly won’t trade a starting OF to acquire a SP, as Lin seems to think.

          4
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          RF for Tatis. If Soto makes a stink, which doesn’t seem likely, maybe LF for Tatis, but no matter what he is moving to the OF.

          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          Good luck to other teams. With no extreme shift, having a good fielding player at all 4 infield positions because a huge plus for the Padres.

          3
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          2 years ago

          Azocar is who I had forgot. He is a 4th outfield at best on a good team like Padres. Any chance Rosario makes Friars’ Opening Day roster?

          3
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          Barring any trades or signings, Rosario is penciled in on the 26 man roster at least until Tatis returns.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew88

          2 years ago

          Eguy Rosario might make opening day roster, but he’s an infielder

          2
          Reply
        • Brew88

          2 years ago

          opening day OF options are really thin for SD. The only other real option besides Azocar/Soto/Grisham are Brandon Dixon (the only other OF on the 40 man roster). I guess Carpenter can play LF if necessary. In the minors they have Dahl, but doubt they’d promote him until he shows he’s capable. Robert Hassell III and James Woods are going to be missed.

          3
          Reply
        • Brew88

          2 years ago

          Rosario (IF) will compete with Matthew Batten for IF utility slot. They may chose Batten in order to get Rosario more ABs at AAA

          2
          Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      2 years ago

      Supply and demand, it does not matter if there are enough teams who want them.

      There would be demand for Kim.

      The teams that were interested in Belli would consider Grisham. I just think the offers will be rather low for Grisham.

      5
      Reply
      • hiflew

        2 years ago

        You are thinking of only demand. The other teams are looking at supply. Teams know the Padres are wanting to improve and are spending a LOT of money to do so. The Padres have too many players at similar positions and will have to move someone if they intend to improve elsewhere. AJ Preller has never been known for his patience. The Padres are over supplied and other teams know it.

        Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          @ hi flew, on the contrary. The SD OF is undersupplied, and other teams know it.

          5
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          Not sure why you think that moving Kim to 2B would hurt the Padres. IF he is an exceptional SS on defense, and he definitely is, he would be an exceptional 2B on defense. His bat is above league average.

          The Padres have no NEED to trade Kim. None whatsoever. In fact, if they trade Kim, they create a hole elsewhere.

          Cronenworth would have to move back to 2B and that leaves an All Star sized hole at 1B with no one on the FA market to replace him. Where are you getting a 1B with a bat as good or better than Cronenworth that plays great defense at the position?

          2
          Reply
        • gwynngwyn

          2 years ago

          Ridiculous take

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          2 years ago

          The defensive spectrum is why moving Kim to 2B hurts the Padres. And Cronenworth’s bat is only “ok” as a first baseman but as a second baseman he’s one of if not the best in MLB.

          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          How does it hurt the Padres? Kim will be a great 2B defensively and his bat plays better at 2B.

          Cronenworth’s bat is better at 1B than any of the 1B still on the market or rumored to be on the trade market. His defense at 1B is better than nearly any other 1B period.

          Having them both on the roster gives the Padres incredible versatility if there is an injury at any infield position.

          So again, how does playing them hurt the Padres?

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          2 years ago

          What? Kim’s bat plays better at shortstop. Shortstop is further to the right on the defensive spectrum than 2nd base. His glove also plays better at shortstop.

          The same is true for Cronenworth at 2nd base vs. 1st base.

          It is not smart baseball to move an elite defensive player from a premium position to a less premium one in deference to an inferior defender just because the inferior defender hits better or has more name value. That is what your Padres are doing.

          Reply
    • Seamaholic

      2 years ago

      Why do they have to move them?

      4
      Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      2 years ago

      Who has to move whom?

      The Padres have said unequivocally that they are not trading Kim. In that article they are quoted as they are going to play the infield as is, Machado, Bogaerts, Kim, Cronenworth. They have no necessity for trading Kim.

      Grisham is not worth much because he hit so poorly last season, so keeping him and hoping for a rebound with the bat makes more sense.

      2
      Reply
  10. Poolhalljunkies

    2 years ago

    Red sox could use kim…fun to see the spin on that..

    3
    Reply
  11. Rishi

    2 years ago

    Operating differently than most clubs after a rebuild by using a successful young player (Kim) as trade bait and signing older ones to large deals at the same position. Could make for a more win now mentality versus a perennial contender. But it’s just two guys being speculated on for now. They are shaping up to be really good.

    1
    Reply
  12. MoTownTigers

    2 years ago

    Kim would be a nice fit for the tigers who need a third baseman. Good defense, decent offense, and the ability to play around the Diamond if a prospect emerges at an affordable price. The tigers have pitching to trade, so this would make sense.

    3
    Reply
    • stymeedone

      2 years ago

      Tigers need offense. Kim is a fine player for 2B or SS. He just can’t provide what’s needed from the corner IF. They are better off trying Kreidler.

      1
      Reply
  13. Wilmer the Thrillmer

    2 years ago

    If someone thinks Kim is overrated, they haven’t seen him play much. The guy is a crazy good fielder, hits well in the clutch and has a great attitude.

    If I were Farhan, I’d overpay to pick the guy up to play second. With the new balanced schedule, hopefully teams will start trading within their divisions.

    10
    Reply
  14. Javia135

    2 years ago

    The Padres are looking for an MLB quality starter in return. Let’s hear the trade ideas.

    2
    Reply
    • AverageCommenter

      2 years ago

      Kim for Houck and Winckowski, plus a lower level guy like Cutter Coffey

      2
      Reply
      • Redsoxx_62

        2 years ago

        Yeah I think Houck for Kim would be a good starting point

        Reply
        • Javia135

          2 years ago

          The Padres are looking for a starter, not a reliever.

          1
          Reply
        • Redsoxx_62

          2 years ago

          Houck is a starter. The Red Sox plan for him in 2023 is to have him start

          Reply
        • Javia135

          2 years ago

          Call Preller. I don’t know enough about Houck but it seems like it could work then.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          Why would the Pads part with a starting OF to fill need for SP when they need more OFers, not less?

          Lin has created nonsensical discussions here.

          5
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          Padres will be looking for a proven starter, not a prospect. Houck is a question mark at this point, and they have enough of those. The only reason to trade a 5+ WAR player is to get rid of a question mark at another position.

          Add to that the fact that Houck cannot be stretched out beyond about 100 innings coming off 2 straight seasons with just 60 IP and that is a definite no.

          1
          Reply
        • butch779988

          2 years ago

          Nick Pivetta and Houck, who is nasty, might work for Kim. Grisham basically is Jackie Bradley Jr.

          Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        2 years ago

        I have been thinking about this a lot since starting on this thread.

        The Padres don’t need prospects. They are in win now mode. If the player they trade for is not stepping into the middle of their rotation and eating up innings while providing an ERA below 3.50, then why bother?

        If they were to even consider trading Kim, they would be looking for a major league starting pitcher and he would have to be a really good one since Kim put up a 5.1 WAR last season and has 2 years off team control remaining.

        A number 2 starter is what is a probable price for Kim.

        Start there and then come up with some trade propositions. Probably not going to be a contending team making the trade since they would be weakening their rotation to shore up SS, but maybe if they have a great rotation and minor league depth.

        1
        Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          2 years ago

          Only contending teams would be interested in Kim because as you mentioned he only has 2 years of control.

          1
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          What contending team is going to be willing to give up a proven MLB starting pitcher for Kim?

          I mentioned Kim and a mid-level prospect for Wright. That would be a fair trade for both teams. Do you think the Braves make that trade?

          What other contending teams are going to be willing to give up their #2 or #3 starter?

          Reply
        • OldSaltUSNR

          2 years ago

          Who says the Padres seek, or need, a #2 or #3 starter?

          As far as relative value, starting position players trump pitching arms, UNLESS the pitcher is a true TOR starter, and there’s only a handful of those throughout major league baseball.

          And as I mentioned in my post (probably near the bottom of this stack), thinking in terms of 1 to 1 trades, Kim for some other players, is misguided. Matchups are difficult at best, and 1 to 1 types, unless bench or PTBNL types, are almost impossible. Think in terms of what Preller could do for several teams, with Grisham, Kim, and possibly a prospect or two, maybe even a relief arm. Then you’ll start to see the possibilities, e.g. say Padres get a RELIABLE #4 or #5 innings eater, good for 10 wins and showing for 190 innings, maybe a CF upgrade, versus some package including Kim, Grisham, prospects, and some unknown MLB player no one is talking about (no, not Tatis, don’t bother restarting that B.S.)..

          Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          2 years ago

          Only team I can think of that would be willing to trade a starter for a MLB position player is the Marlins and they probably want someone with more of a bat than Kim.

          Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      2 years ago

      Padres offer Trevor Rogers and Wendle for Kim and Eguy Rosario

      3
      Reply
    • RonDarlingShouldntBeInTheHallOfFame

      2 years ago

      Kim and Grisham for Sale, Verdugo, Dalbec, and cash.

      3
      Reply
      • Henry Silvestre

        2 years ago

        Sale has negative value bro you would have to add Devers +Sale to be in the ballpark for Kim

        3
        Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          2 years ago

          No way on Devers. Kim is a great player but not worth Devers at all. That would be stupid.

          Reply
      • Cora the Destroya

        2 years ago

        I’d take just Kim for Sale and Dalbec but I would hate to see Sale go.

        Reply
    • Manfred’s playing with the balls

      2 years ago

      Pablo Lopez for C Luis Campusano, LHP Jackson Wolf, LHP Ryan Weathers and CF Trent Grisham?

      2
      Reply
      • RonDarlingShouldntBeInTheHallOfFame

        2 years ago

        A’s fan-I’d do that in a second if I was the Padres

        4
        Reply
      • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

        2 years ago

        The Marlins want a huge amount. Look at their sky-high demands from the Yankees. Besides, I think they wanted an offensive upgrade, and Grisham being the center of that deal (or Luis Campusano) likely isn’t good enough. They wanted that top Yankees shortstop prospect.

        Reply
      • Henry Silvestre

        2 years ago

        That’s actually pretty close.. switch Wolf for Henry Williams and it’s a good deal for both

        1
        Reply
    • Wilmer the Thrillmer

      2 years ago

      Cobb plus a top 10 organizational starting pitcher (Carson Whisenhunt #7)? Cobb had a nice year last year.

      Reply
  15. RonDarlingShouldntBeInTheHallOfFame

    2 years ago

    I feel like Kim, and Grisham to Boston for Verdugo, Sale, Dalbec, and probably 50m cash could work. Pads need an OF, 1B, and another starter, and the Sox need a SS and CF. Seems like a good fit.

    4
    Reply
    • Henry Silvestre

      2 years ago

      I think of you switch Dalbec for Casas that deal aint bad

      2
      Reply
      • AverageCommenter

        2 years ago

        No way the Sox trade Casas. I actually think it’s fine as is, depending on how much the Padres like Dalbec

        1
        Reply
        • RonDarlingShouldntBeInTheHallOfFame

          2 years ago

          Average..Agreed..Dalbec would play 1st/platoon with Carpenter..Cronenworth stays at 2nd, Tatis to CF, Soto to LF, and Verdugo to RF. Eguy Rosario gets his shot as the utility guy, and AJ gets his starter..essentially free for two years..It makes tons of sense.

          1
          Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      2 years ago

      Let me take that one piece at a time.

      Grisham was more valuable than Verdugo last season. More than double the value.

      Sale is a net negative in any trade. The Red Sox would have to pay all of his remaining contract and add prospects just to get rid of him, much like the Padres did to get rid of Hosmer.

      Dalbec is also a net negative in any trade. He is a replacement level player. We used to call guys like him AAAA players. Too good for AAA, but not good enough to be in the majors.

      So, if it was Grisham for Sale, Dalbec, Verdugo and $40-50 million, that might be fair to the Padres.

      Add Kim and it’s a no go.

      1
      Reply
      • Deleted Userrr

        2 years ago

        If Sale’s trade value were really that far underwater the Red Sox would just release him. Attaching prospects and eating the whole contract would just be stupid. It was stupid when Preller did it with Hosmer too.

        Bobby Dalbec is making the league minimum. He can’t be a net negative in a trade.

        1
        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          2 years ago

          Sale has negative trade value. Just like Price a few years back. The Red Sox will have to pay both a large amount of money and prospects to get rid of him or eat a huge contract in return. Maybe they only have to pay $50 million of the $55 million he is owed, not all of it.

          Dalbec is bad defensively regardless of where he plays and he can’t hit plus would take up a 40 man roster on his new team with little chance of making the major league squad, so he has negative value in a trade. It has nothing to do with how much or how little he is being paid.

          Reply
        • RonDarlingShouldntBeInTheHallOfFame

          2 years ago

          Web-His value on paper may be negative, but you and I both know that if he can put together a single season during the rest of his contract being even reasonably healthy, he’s one of the best in the game, and is a bonafide game 1 playoff starter. If the Sox paid 50m, that would leave the Padres on the hook for 3yrs, 29m..which would be a steal..and which in my opinion, puts him back on the plus side value wise..which in my opinion, makes the deal worth it when adding in Verdugo and Dalbec.

          1
          Reply
        • RonDarlingShouldntBeInTheHallOfFame

          2 years ago

          Dalbec would platoon with Carpenter at DH/1B, and Verdugo would be an excellent 7 hitter when added to the Pads lineup.

          Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          2 years ago

          Give them Winckowski too then you have a deal

          1
          Reply
        • RonDarlingShouldntBeInTheHallOfFame

          2 years ago

          Pwndroia-Done. We’ll take him as minor league depth. Draw up the paperwork.

          Reply
        • Deleted Userrr

          2 years ago

          If a player is owed the league minimum the absolute lowest his trade value can be no matter how bad he is is zero.

          1
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          2 years ago

          Maybe they only have to pay $50 million of the $55 million he is owed, not all of it.
          =================================
          That’s ridiculous. You’re treating Sale as if he were dead. FWIW, FG projects a 2.9 WAR. Given the contracts being handed out this off-season, I’m not all inclined to trade him.

          If I were the RS, I’d tell SD that that Verdugo, Houck, Dalbec & Duran in some combination for Kim and/or Grisham.

          Reply
  16. jimd-2

    2 years ago

    Braves or Phillies should be looking to add Grisham. He owned the Mets and Scherzer in the NL playoffs.

    3
    Reply
    • SeibuLionsNPB

      2 years ago

      If I was AA I’d call up and see if you could get both Kim and Grisham for a package that has either Padres pick of Ian Anderson or bryce elder, shuster, roddery munoz, cody milligan, and eddie rosario to offset some salary.it may be an overpay for atlanta but it improves the braves who are in win now mode. The padres get an mlb ready pitcher and 3 of the braves top 30 prospects in Shuster, munoz, and milligan. Rosario is an outfielder to return back to the padres who would need a mlb caliber upgrade and it offsets some salary for both sides.

      Reply
      • j_butte

        2 years ago

        I’d rather have Rosario than Grisham. Eddie had better offensive numbers blind last year than Trent and a much longer track record of offensive success. Kim I’d be interested in though.

        Reply
  17. hammertime510

    2 years ago

    Irvin and Kemp for Kim

    Reply
  18. PutPeteinthehall

    2 years ago

    Trent needs a hitting lab. Probably needed to be sent down last season. The focus at major league level is to win games. The focus at triple a is to develop players. The best is yet to come. He was rushed to MLB.

    1
    Reply
  19. ClevelandSteelEngines

    2 years ago

    Kim to Sox in exchange for fans forgiving Padres for stealing Bogaerts.

    6
    Reply
  20. MLB Top 100 Commenter

    2 years ago

    Kim and a prospect to Sox for Hendricks

    1
    Reply
  21. BigFred

    2 years ago

    Grisham sounds like another Cody Bellinger.

    1
    Reply
    • Seamaholic

      2 years ago

      Better fielder, worse hitter

      Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        2 years ago

        Last season Grisham was better at both. That is incredible to type, but true. Wow! If I had not looked it up, I would not have believed it.

        83 OPS+, 8 DRS, 17 OAA
        78 OPS+, 0 DRS, 7 OAA

        1
        Reply
  22. cbraves

    2 years ago

    Braves could use both of them .

    2
    Reply
    • 99socalfrc

      2 years ago

      HSK to the Braves would probably end up with another parade in Atlanta and AA stealing the “Rockstar” GM nickname right out from under clueless Preller.

      1
      Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      2 years ago

      Kim and mid-level prospect to the Braves for Wright.

      Reply
  23. bkbk

    2 years ago

    Kim to the Angels for moniak and jordyn adams

    Reply
    • Javia135

      2 years ago

      2 failed prospects for Kim? No thanks.

      3
      Reply
  24. getrealgone2

    2 years ago

    The Braves don’t have much else to offer SD.

    Reply
    • Henry Silvestre

      2 years ago

      D’arnaud for Kim..

      Padres could then send Grish and Campy to Fish for Lopez + Berti

      1
      Reply
      • Gman7777

        2 years ago

        That looks like an even-up swap that works perfect for both teams. Their contract $ are almost identical other than D’Arnaud’s option year is 2024 (no buyout) and Kim’s option yr is 2025 ($2m buyout).

        Kim and Grissom would be Belliard/Blauser all over again. Not great but just good enough.

        1
        Reply
  25. VegasMoved

    2 years ago

    I don’t know, trading Kim would mean the Padres only have 4 shortstops in their lineup…

    6
    Reply
    • Henry Silvestre

      2 years ago

      5 but who is counting Nola was a SS

      2
      Reply
      • Javia135

        2 years ago

        Machado, Bogaerts, Kim, Cronenworth, Tatis and Nola = 6.

        2
        Reply
        • Henry Silvestre

          2 years ago

          He meant after the trade ..yes we have 6 but would still have 5 if Kim moved

          2
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          Rosario can also play SS, in fact he has the best throwing arm of the other 6

          4
          Reply
        • Javia135

          2 years ago

          Actually, Tatis had the fastest infield throw on record in MLB until O’Neil Cruz threw one faster.

          2
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          Faster yes, Tatis has the canon of cannons, but not rated as better (includes accuracy)

          5
          Reply
  26. Henry Silvestre

    2 years ago

    I can see a Kim for Arraez type deal with the Twins..Crone stays at 2B and Arraez starts at 1B

    2
    Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      2 years ago

      That is the 1st trade proposition that actually seems doable and fair for both teams on this board so far.

      1
      Reply
    • Gwynning

      2 years ago

      I was thinking Twins too. Kim and Grish for Bailey Ober and Buxton. If they whine, we throw in Weathers and 2 Zoo passes.

      Reply
      • Cora the Destroya

        2 years ago

        Who wants Buxton at this point? April/May hitter and injured the rest of the time.

        Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 years ago

          I’d be banking on the ol’ change of scenery speculation for Bux… but you’re probably right Pedey.

          Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          2 years ago

          I can’t even use that argument. Scenery isn’t the problem when you hit over .300 in April and May. He just can’t hit for average outsthose months. months.

          Reply
  27. Henry Silvestre

    2 years ago

    I can see Kim to Boston for Cadas + Sale + $30mil to offset Sales negative value

    Reply
    • Henry Silvestre

      2 years ago

      Casas

      Reply
    • dirty617water

      2 years ago

      And who would play 1st???

      Reply
    • coup

      2 years ago

      I’m sorry Henry but I strongly doubt Boston would do that. I can see a KIm for Arraez deal happening though. I’d love to be proven wrong about your. Bosox proposal That would be an awesome deal for the Padres!

      2
      Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        2 years ago

        It would be a total fail for the Padres. An above average hitter and exceptional defensive SS for a 1B prospect that has not proven he can play at the major league level? No.

        Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          2 years ago

          Not when you get Chris Sale with him.

          Reply
        • coup

          2 years ago

          I hope Henry’s Bosox proposal will happen. I love Casas and Sale!

          Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          2 years ago

          I don’t think we will trade Casas. Dalbec is more likely but who would want him?

          Reply
    • Cora the Destroya

      2 years ago

      Not Casas but Dalbec and Sale.

      Reply
  28. User 589131137

    2 years ago

    Pick up the phone Antonetti….

    Reply
  29. rememberthecoop

    2 years ago

    I say “meh” on both players.

    1
    Reply
    • Cora the Destroya

      2 years ago

      Kim had over 5 WAR. That was double Bryce Harper’s WAR in 2022

      Reply
  30. SODOMOJO

    2 years ago

    Seriously? Grish is the one they want to trade? We’ll take him off your hands. He’d look great next to Julo and Teoscar

    1
    Reply
  31. CrikesAlready

    2 years ago

    The only player I cheered for on the Padres was HSK. Even offering him up for trade, a guy who really stepped up and helped the Padres immensely, while Preller wasn’t out getting a top flight first baseman…

    All I could hope for is a team like the Dodgers or Giants get him and beat the crap out of the Padres every time they play. HSK is this Padre generation’s Tim Flannery, except HSK has talent.

    3
    Reply
    • SODOMOJO

      2 years ago

      I love watching HSK highlights. Guy can play some d. And makes it look smooth and simple

      3
      Reply
    • Brew’88

      2 years ago

      What makes you think the Pads are offering Kim up for trade?

      5
      Reply
  32. 99socalfrc

    2 years ago

    Kim raised his average 50 points in year 2 of MLB, is the best SS defensively on their roster (easily) and has 2 years of control left. Trading him would be pretty dumb.

    Grisham is as good as gone, because selling low is one of Preller’s favorite go to’s. That the guy plays a great CF and you have no logical replacement seals the deal.

    Reply
    • Seamaholic

      2 years ago

      He’s their only CF. Tatis has never played there.

      2
      Reply
    • Henry Silvestre

      2 years ago

      I dont know if Grish value is low with a 2nd GG in 2022 and a phenomenal WC series vs Mets and awesome NLCS vs LAD..Got to consider Grish is a FA in 2024.. and we can’t afford him with Manny/Xander/Tatis under control ..yes Manny staying (extension in Spring)..and Soto a FA as well in 24.. if they keep the Fearsome 4 some together (around $135mil per AAV.. the other 4 position players and DH + bench going to be a lot of pre-arb guys or arb 1, 2 max.. like Merrill taking over for Crone (traded) etc..cant keep the 4 and pay more than $10mil to more than one other + a bunch of minimums and $1-$2mil guys Pitching would take about $100mil so 3-4 SP get paid 3-4 BP get paid and the rest again from within controlled younger types

      1
      Reply
      • Simm

        2 years ago

        Grisham isn’t a free agent until after 2025. 3 more years of control still.

        2
        Reply
  33. Consigliore

    2 years ago

    Grisham is painful to watch at the plate. He often seems lost and watches many strikes go by without swinging, especially with 2 strikes. Wha’?ver happened to “protecting the plate.”

    4
    Reply
  34. mp9

    2 years ago

    I hope Twins gets Kim !!!

    Reply
  35. Cleon Jones

    2 years ago

    No way, zero chance, none, SD is trading Kim.

    1
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      2 years ago

      No way, zero chance, none, SD is trading Kim.
      ===========================
      Where does he play?

      Reply
      • Javia135

        2 years ago

        Kim will begin the year as the Padres 2B. When Bogaerts defense starts to slip he and Kim will switch positions.

        4
        Reply
    • Brew’88

      2 years ago

      Mlbtr should have told that to Lin, rather than misrepresenting the speculation of Lin as some sort of source-based fact.

      6
      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        2 years ago

        I wouldn’t dismiss the rumors either. The best way for Preller to put the word out that Grisham and Kim are available is to let Lin write about without attribution. This way Preller doesn’t have to telegraph the fact that he is looking to move them.

        And both names make

        Reply
        • Brew88

          2 years ago

          I wouldn’t dismiss the rumor, I just don’t see evidence that it exists external to Lin’s self-admitted speculation

          Reply
  36. guilderc

    2 years ago

    Domingo German for Trent Grisham? I’d imagine the Yanks would have to throw in a prospect as well.

    Reply
  37. websoulsurfer

    2 years ago

    The article says that the Padres have steadfastly said that Kim was not available in trade, but that some unnamed sources in the industry are claiming they are open to trading him.

    Reply
    • Brew’88

      2 years ago

      Unnamed sources = non story

      5
      Reply
  38. raysiniowa

    2 years ago

    Tampa Bay Rays, here’s your lefty hitting outfielder, Grisham is a stud, get it done!

    Reply
  39. vacommish

    2 years ago

    This pair is tailor made for the Braves.

    1
    Reply
  40. Cora the Destroya

    2 years ago

    I wouldn’t mind at all if Bloom took a shot at getting Kim. I think Kim has a lot of potential. He’s just playing on a crowded Padres team, which has not helped his cause.

    1
    Reply
  41. MoTownTigers

    2 years ago

    @stymedone
    1 Teams don’t have to have power at every position. Complementary players are import – as is defense and team chemistry.
    2 please tell me where the Tigers are going to find a major league third baseman with 30 hr power.
    3 if the rest of the lineup hits to their potential, there’s plenty of power on the team.
    4 he very well might settle at second with greater range than schoop who can play third and will be gone next year.
    5 kriedler hit 230 at aaa, and was below the Mendoza line with the Tigers last year.

    Before correcting people, you should have a clue of what you’re talking about.

    1
    Reply
    • Dogs

      2 years ago

      Eduardo Rodriguez even up for Kim.

      Reply
    • stymeedone

      2 years ago

      @motown
      Are your feelings hurt because I disagreed with your opinion? I didn’t “correct” anyone. If you look at what Kim did in 2021, it left little optimism for what he did in 2022. Yet they played him and look what happened. Kreidler was a top prospect when the Tigers were ranked the 3rd best farm. I would like to see how much he can offer. As to last year, are you aware he was injured for much of the year? Also, where did you come up with the 30 HR requirement? It wasn’t from me. I would take Kim in a heartbeat over Baez, but at SS. Since Detroit has Baez, lets see what the Farm can provide (since Harris cut their best option, Candelario, arguing over $1mm).

      Reply
  42. ericl

    2 years ago

    I don’t think Grisham is enough to get Lopez from the Marlins. The Fish want to trade from their pitching depth to improve their offense. I think they’d want a better offensive threat than Grisham.

    1
    Reply
    • Javia135

      2 years ago

      Then it would have to be a 3-team trade. I don’t think the Padres should or will trade either one. This is just noise to get people talking.

      3
      Reply
      • Brew’88

        2 years ago

        Exactly

        4
        Reply
  43. VegasSDfan

    2 years ago

    Who would play Center? Also, who would play Short or 2nd for Kim. I want the Padres to keep Kim

    3
    Reply
    • Simm

      2 years ago

      Tatis would play center, Xander plays short and cronenworth plays second. Carpenter then goes to 1st or they add a player like Mancini.

      1
      Reply
      • Brew’88

        2 years ago

        Or they just add a SP and dont trade their starting CF

        7
        Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        2 years ago

        If Tatis plays CF, who plays LF? Azocar?

        Reply
    • Deleted Userr

      2 years ago

      Tatis in CF, Bogaerts at SS and Cronenworth at 2B.

      1
      Reply
    • Brew’88

      2 years ago

      Keep Kim but sit him against tough RH pitchers, which means he starts about 60 games at 2B, and provides backup depth at SS and 3B. When Kim sits, Crone moves back to 2b, someone else, I guess Carpenter, plays 1b.

      5
      Reply
  44. James Midway

    2 years ago

    Fake news

    4
    Reply
  45. vaderzim

    2 years ago

    And after these guys had big moments in the postseason. I feel like they should ride the momentum, but I can’t blame them for wanting to improve and try to restock their younger arsenal.

    Reply
  46. DrDan75

    2 years ago

    Grisham has turned into a left handed Austin Hedges with an outfielder’s glove.

    1
    Reply
    • towinagain

      2 years ago

      Nope. Grisham has value

      4
      Reply
  47. omahamadness

    2 years ago

    Two fresh start candidates, Jack Flaherty for Grisham, who says no?

    Reply
    • fivepoundbass

      2 years ago

      Cards say no. They wouldn’t start Grisham over Carlson

      1
      Reply
  48. comebackcub

    2 years ago

    Would leave the depth on the Padres until Tatis returns so you can see how he bounces back.

    2
    Reply
    • fivepoundbass

      2 years ago

      Agreed. Wrist surgery does not always to a simple recovery

      Reply
  49. tbone0816

    2 years ago

    Trent Grisham and Ha Sehong Kim for Dakota Hudson, Paul DeJong and Alec Burelson

    Reply
    • Bruin1012

      2 years ago

      Lol

      1
      Reply
    • Bruin1012

      2 years ago

      Yea not going to happen but good try.

      Reply
  50. Jaysfan1981

    2 years ago

    Kim would look really good at 2nd on this current Jays squad

    2
    Reply
  51. big tee

    2 years ago

    Paging the Jays…here is your real 3rd outfielder, do the right thing, make Kiermaier a bench player where he can get hurt and no one will care. Grisham is coming off a down year but he’s got some real talent and would fit in with this jays team. C’mon Russ!

    1
    Reply
    • towinagain

      2 years ago

      Pads need a starter

      Reply
  52. Sid Bream Speed Demon

    2 years ago

    OK AA, now is the time to step up.

    Reply
  53. lowgear22

    2 years ago

    Grisham and Kim for Kepler? Grisham and Kim seem like just the type of players that the Twins would take a flyer on, but I don’t know enough about them to honestly say this is a good value trade for both sides?

    1
    Reply
    • Javia135

      2 years ago

      Not close lowgear22.

      3
      Reply
  54. lowgear22

    2 years ago

    Would Kim and Grisham for Kepler a reasonable swap? I didn’t know enough about those two players but it seems they are the type of players that the Twins might take a flyer on?

    1
    Reply
    • Bruin1012

      2 years ago

      No

      1
      Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      2 years ago

      Is there any chance that Kim could play CF?

      1
      Reply
  55. Deleted Userr

    2 years ago

    Frankly the Padres should be looking to move Kim. Only has 2 years of control, can’t hit a MLB fastball and is blocked at the only position where he’s really valuable.

    2
    Reply
    • Brew’88

      2 years ago

      I can fathom a Kim trade for the reasons you’ve given, but they need not just another SP, but also another OF and 1b/DH guy.

      I like Bogaerts as a player and a personality, but I have to wonder if payroll could have been used to fill more pressing needs.

      I don’t think they’ll sign anymore pricey FAs, if so they would have by now.

      1
      Reply
      • Jimbo_Jones

        2 years ago

        @brew88 they don’t need another OF or a 1b. They definitely need another SP even if that SP doesn’t go deep into games their BP can pickup the innings every 5 days. Cueto or Wacha would probably be enough

        2
        Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          I do think they need another SP, my point is that they can’t part with a starting OF to get one, unless they want to start season with an OF of Azocar, minor leaguer who’s not ready, Soto.

          1
          Reply
        • Jimbo_Jones

          2 years ago

          For 20 games azocar would be sufficient but yeah I get what you’re saying

          2
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          Is it just me or does anyone else feel concerned about Tatis being counted on as full time OF? A new position after all that he’s been through won’t be a seamless transition.Seems the Pads should be adding depth at OF, not parting with Grisham to solve lack of depth at SP.

          2
          Reply
        • Jimbo_Jones

          2 years ago

          You don’t think cueto or wacha would fill that role with the deep BP picking up the slack? No trade keep both Kim and Grish. Have a 6 man rotation. I think it’s a decent place to start to the season

          2
          Reply
        • Jimbo_Jones

          2 years ago

          @brew tatis has played RF in 2021 with his eyes closed. He complained about how boring it was. As it stands there are 4 OFs 5 if you count carpenter as a limited LF (I don’t but the org does). Something to keep in mind right field is huge at Petco LF is tight due to the foul zone. Azocar is underrated. He’s proven he can handle the defense most of the time minus a couple miscues.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          2 years ago

          @Jimbo. I think Cueto is who they want, and he would fit well, but I’m not sure they have the $ to sign another FA.

          2
          Reply
        • Simm

          2 years ago

          They offered judge 414m or thereabouts. They have the money. Cueto isn’t going to cost all that much.

          2
          Reply
      • Deleted Userr

        2 years ago

        I get that there weren’t any good free agent bats available at positions that were actually needs for the Padres, but I hate the fit with Bogaerts. I was all in on the “Kim at shortstop and Tatis at not shortstop” train. But I’d honestly rather they have not signed Bogaerts, put Tatis at shortstop and seen if he couldn’t dial back the throwing errors then spent the Bogaerts money on pitching.

        3
        Reply
        • Jimbo_Jones

          2 years ago

          @TLH Well said. Total head scratcher, could have picked up two solid SPs.

          1
          Reply
    • Jimbo_Jones

      2 years ago

      @ TLH Thumbs down. Look at their 40 man add Tatis. A SP maybe a catcher are of need. Is it lights out WS team WTFKs but there’s always the trade deadline

      1
      Reply
  56. towinagain

    2 years ago

    Unless it’s a controllable arm, Twins and Marlins, match-up then sign a FA.

    Reply
  57. Hired Gun 23

    2 years ago

    I don’t see a trade happening…

    2
    Reply
  58. roiste

    2 years ago

    Ha-Seong Kim fits the the Red Sox’s current needs like a glove. Decent right-handed bat who might gain a little power boost from the monster, and a Gold Glove-caliber SS who would instantly give the Sox one of the best defensive middle infields in the game with Story at second (a refreshing change of pace from recent years). Moreover, his two years of control would line up perfectly with Mayer’s projected timeline for debut.

    In return, I think Tanner Houck makes sense to go to the Padres. SD has a great top three, but Nick Martinez has some question marks, and relying on Seth Lugo to switch back to starting at this point in his career is a risky gambit for a contending team, Houck would give the Padres a much better sixth starter than their fairly thin current options, and would slot in pretty naturally as high-level multi-inning guy in SD’s pen.

    I might be misvaluing either player, but even if a package for Kim would look different I think the BoSox have plenty of resources to help the Padres with their relative weaknesses in the rotation and the outfield. I hope Bloom is engaged on Kim, because he’s the only shortstop available who seems like he could truly make a difference for the team’s Wild Card hopes.

    1
    Reply
    • Jimbo_Jones

      2 years ago

      @roiste currently the Pads have a iffy 6 man rotation with Martinez, Lugo and morejon at the back. Kim would require much more then a borderline starter. Kim and Rosario for a 3rd type starter might get it done. It sounds as though Grisham is the piece they would be willing to part with

      Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      2 years ago

      Houck is a definite no. Padres are in win now mode and Houck won’t throw more than 100 innings in 2023 after 2 straight seasons around 60 IP. He doesn’t tip the scales and would not be enough for a 5+ WAR SS anyway.

      Reply
      • roiste

        2 years ago

        Yeah, I don’t buy Kim as a 5+ win SS. He gets most of his value from his glove, which teams value much less than offensive production. Fangraph’s 3.7 WAR valuation is much more appropriate to me.

        Houck’s production as a starter has been elite, even if you need to pull him fairly early in the game. The injury risk is there, but he’s a better bet to perform than Seth Lugo and Adrian Morejon. Plus, he has four years of cost control compared to Kim’s two.

        Maybe the BoSox need to add another solid piece (not Casas), but the gap isn’t as big as you think.

        Reply
  59. urnuts

    2 years ago

    Kim ( who has had only 1 solid year) and Grisham to the Angels for Adell, Jared Walsh, and Barria?

    Reply
    • Gwynning

      2 years ago

      urnuts!

      Reply
      • urnuts

        2 years ago

        yup.

        Reply
  60. OldSaltUSNR

    2 years ago

    Grisham is the only legitimate CF on the Padres roster (at least defensively). Kim is only redundant, if greater needs are considered.

    Therefore, if Preller does put together a trade involving Grisham, he needs a CF coming back. Thinking of Grisham and/or Kim in terms of some sort of 1 to 1 trade with another team is misguided. Matchups are difficult. However, as a multi-team package, add in some still valuable Padre prospects, and it starts making sense.

    What are the Padres objectives?:

    1) Upgrade CF
    2) Add a reliable back end, starting pitcher.

    The team is pretty well set, everywhere else, and can afford to move Kim. Kim is a GG caliber SS, with a serviceable bat. Before some of you sneer at that assessment, go look at Kim’s track record in the KBO. 2022 wasn’t some new “break out” season for a rookie. It was a return to form, for a playoff experienced veteran. Yep, MLB pitching has had his number, but he turned the corner in 2022. He’s worth a lot more than most here recognize. Grisham is a gold glove CF, with a history of hitting, albeit his recent troubles relegate him to a reliable defensive CF with potential upside. That still has value, as well.

    If anyone can put together a three team, “win-win-win” trade, it’s Preller. Like he always stresses, it’s all about match ups and relative value. Maybe it happens. Maybe it doesn’t. I’m guessing that on the Padres trade board, it’s option #434., among all the deals they are trying to work. (- not 434 in priority; I mean that I believe that the Pads have dozens if not 100’s of potential scenarios on the board at any given time, and they’re probably not the only team like that.).

    1
    Reply
    • Jimbo_Jones

      2 years ago

      That’s well thought out. I believe this why logically they should stay the course. However AJ is unpredictable. As I’ve said before I think a cueto signing or wacha would be the most pragmatic move but it’s AJ after all. The catching situation is a concern too IMO

      3
      Reply
      • OldSaltUSNR

        2 years ago

        I heard that AJP has an allergy to some irritant called “stay the course”.

        The Pads need a #6 pitcher. Even adding another back end starter, their rotation is still much weaker on paper, than last year. Fortunately, adding back end starters is about 100x easier than finding TOR, front end quality starters. I think they’ll get that done.

        Otherwise, Grisham’s defense is all the Padres “must have” out of CF; any upside with his bat is a plus, given the rest of the lineup. Kim is the best defensive SS the Padres have, and probably, one of the top 4-5 in the MLB.. He’s a 5 WAR upgrade any place the Pads put him, and the kind of backup IF any W.S. contending team needs (at least, wants very badly).

        1
        Reply
        • Jimbo_Jones

          2 years ago

          As impressive as the rotation was on paper last year the production from manaea,clevinger and first half Snell was disappointing. The BP looks even better this year.
          Bryan Reynolds looks ripe for a trade but the Pirates are nutts. I imagine as it gets closer to ST they become more pliable

          Reply
    • Jimbo_Jones

      2 years ago

      I’m not sure how many games you watched last season but Grisham’s at bats are rage inducing. How does a guy with so much talent appear to take a majority of his at bats as though he’s a pitcher? Then a minority of his at bats he’s a slugger WTH!

      3
      Reply
      • OldSaltUSNR

        2 years ago

        It’s all in his head. Figure it out, and you’ve got an instant 7 figure job as a baseball shrink on any team in the majors.

        1
        Reply
  61. SanDiegoSuperDissapointingPadres

    2 years ago

    I would hate to see Kim go, Grishtober was fun but I agree @Jimbo he makes me want to punch walls with his at bats. Especially with the blank face stupid look after countless called 3 strikeouts.

    What was the kids name in Miami that threw like 200mph and had to get TJ? I think it was Sixto Sanchez. He was a bit wild but let Ruben get ahold of him he’ll get him dialed in. Grish for Sanchez!

    Reply
    • Jimbo_Jones

      2 years ago

      @BBTR Sanchez had shoulder surgery around July of 21 from what I could gather. The fish believe he’ll be ready this spring but it’s a year and a half since homie has pitched (maybe more at this point). Dicey move. He’ll probably be relegated to the BP for sometime. We got saurez I’m thinking this isn’t the move but I could be off

      Reply
  62. In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

    2 years ago

    Grisham should go back to single A to learn how to hit professional pitching before he is allowed to play another day in the MLB. He hits worse than many pitchers. Kim is more of a AAA/MLB guy. Defense gets guys like Fuld, Simmons, White, etc. bench roles. Offense gets guys paid.

    Reply
    • SanDiegoSuperDissapointingPadres

      2 years ago

      I was going to let your comment sit but…bro, have you watched a Padres game before? Do you even know who Kim and Grisham are?

      Yes, Grisham can be a liability at the plate at times. But, my man is a gold glove center fielder.

      Kim, was a monster at shortstop this year. He got an MVP vote and gold glove consideration. He’s no AAA/MLB guy, he’s a starter on any team. He’s an average bat with good speed.

      Watch a couple Padres games this year…

      1
      Reply
      • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

        2 years ago

        It’s an ironic comment, considering your username. I have watched White play, though, and I do remember Eli White’s superman jump that robbed Ji Man Choi of a 3 run homerun. Still, that defense doesn’t necessarily make up for having a black hole in the lineup. I know Grisham is far better offensively, but still. I have also watched Kiner-Falefa enough to know he wasn’t worth 6.7 WAR from 2021 to 2022. I mean Kim may be a solid regular, but he is no MVP.

        Reply
  63. This one belongs to the Reds

    2 years ago

    Cincy needs a CF but if the Pads want a SP, that isn’t happening. But Grisham would get well offensively in that ballpark if his mechanics are sound.

    Reply
  64. TennVol

    2 years ago

    Padres might have been a little late getting this word out. So many teams were looking for LH centerfield help, like the Jays, and have made other moves. The Jays and Padres would have made interesting trading partners for Grisham.

    Reply
    • Simm

      2 years ago

      I’m sure if the jays were interested they have already spoken to the padres. It’s not like team woke up yesterday and decided to search for options.

      By now I’m sure just about every team has spoken to every team about possible options they are interested in.

      Reply
  65. acoss13

    2 years ago

    Alright White Sox, start making calls to Preller, Kim would be the second baseman that is sorely needed.

    2
    Reply
    • YEP

      2 years ago

      Kinda what I’m thinking. Him or Jazz Chisholm Jr of Miami.

      1
      Reply
  66. JoeBrady

    2 years ago

    I’d like either guy for the RS, but the lack of prospect development over the past, well, since Theo left.

    Reply
    • Simm

      2 years ago

      I think any trade with the Red Sox would involve sale. He is a huge risk for the padres to acquire but they may chance that he can actually pitch more than 10 innnings. I’m sure it would require some cash coming from the Sox.

      If the Sox decide to trade devers I could a much larger deal involving him.

      Preller loves the shinny toys and worries about how they fit later.

      Sale and devers for Grisham, Kim and prospects. The prospect level would be largely determined by how much of the contract the sox eat if any.

      Reply
      • Deleted Userr

        2 years ago

        Preller blocks Bloom’s number if he suggests this trade.

        Reply
        • Simm

          2 years ago

          Don’t underestimate prellers desire for shinny objects.

          Reply
  67. bwmiller

    2 years ago

    White Sox should be in on this trade:

    Grisham
    Kim
    Campusano
    Rosario

    -for-

    Giolito
    Grandal

    gives the Padres the SP they are after, and a high OBP starting catcher.

    The Sox get a second baseman and their future catcher, and can start Grisham in center, they could then trade Luis Robert to the Marlins for say Max Meyer.

    Reply
    • Simm

      2 years ago

      Haha, that is such a terrible trade for the padres.

      Seriously awful.

      1
      Reply
    • Deleted Userr

      2 years ago

      Kim isn’t a 2nd baseman and BTV says Campusano on his own gets this trade done.

      Reply
      • bwmiller

        2 years ago

        I dont know, Giolito is a better pitcher than Rogers and Lopez in Miami, he had a tough year but his strike out numbers were in line and he’s better than his ERA from ’22 suggests.

        Grandal is still top five OBP catchers in MLB, and he has 20HR power, his defense is in decline and he’s a risk with his injury history but the Padres depth at C should allow them to take a risk here.

        Campusano and Grisham is the return for Giolito, and that’s a fair deal. Grandal is a upgrade at C for the Padres.

        Sox don’t need Kim, I like our infield prospects as much or more than Kim, but his salary offsets some of what Grandal is owed.

        Rosario is a player that in my opinion that makes the deal good for the Sox.

        Giolito is the center piece of that trade. Sox are the team taking on a CF who hit .190 last season, great defense but won’t stick around if he can’t hit. Campusano hasn’t proven to be good or great at the big league level. Rosario also a prospect.

        I think it’s a good deal, but I guess it all depends on how you view Giolito, to me he is an SP2, SP3. And whether or not you consider Grandal to still have a good season behind the plate in him, because Padres are in win now mode, and if Grandal plays up to his capabilities, he adds significant value offensively to the Padres lineup.

        Trade long term could benefit the Sox but short term Padres upgrade their rotation significantly and add a potential difference maker to their offense.

        Reply
        • Simm

          2 years ago

          Grandal has neg trade value. Gio had a terrible year last year. You add him with neg grandal and I’m not sure you get a single thing for the pair unless the white Sox including a bag of cash. When I said a bag I mean a big bag.

          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          Giolito is coming off a down season and is also a one year rental. Grandal has negative trade value and was already a Padre previously and Preller hated him so much he traded him for Matt Kemp. Plus the Padres are already set at C.

          Reply
        • bwmiller

          2 years ago

          Yeah you’re wrong about Grandal, the calculator may say he has negative trade value but he is a year removed from a .240/.420/.520 over 400 ABs and that looks real good when you are all in to win in ’23 – Grandal is a guy that has proven it over a career, .350 OBP and is only 34.

          Was hurt last year, worst year of his career, but if he checks out physically and is good for 400 ABs and average defense, I’m sure the Padres would be interested.

          As far as Giolito goes, I’m certain they would be interested. At this point taking on the extra salary to get a front line starting pitcher and a catcher that has the potential to be the best offensive catcher in the league, well I’m sure the Padres would consider the trade.

          The Sox could win this year, I think they have the team to win the central, that’s also in large part dependent on Giolito and Grandal, it all comes down to who has more proclivity to take on the risk that they bounce back and I’d say the Padres are that team, so the trade makes sense from that standpoint.

          Reply
        • Simm

          2 years ago

          Current value if grandal is negative. Doesn’t matter what he did two years ago. He is over paid and under performed. Gio still has some value but packaging him with grandal removes most if not all of his value.

          Zero chance the padres would do that for anything if value.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          Grandal has negative trade value. Full stop.

          The Padres could definitely use Giolito but with him being a one-year rental and coming off a down season his trade value, it’s limited.

          Reply
        • bwmiller

          2 years ago

          You can peg a guy as having negative value with calculations but the wins and the losses come from risk reward propositions and being on the right side of those decisions. This is a somewhat risky trade, but has a big pay off, and in my opinion is less risky than the numbers of last season make it out to be because Giolito has been fairly consistent as a front line starter and Grandal has produced over a long career consistently. If both are healthy its not as risky of a trade as it may seem to be, betting that both players rebound to their former mean.

          When you are in the Padres position, having a one year window with Juan Soto, where payroll in ’23 is more or less a non factor at this point, the real consideration is how much better does the trade make the team?

          And, can you do better elsewhere? I don’t know if they can or can’t but I think the trade I proposed is a good deal for both teams and a good trade.

          If it was Grisham and Campusano straight up for Lopez, or the trade I proposed, if I was SD, I’d prefer to take on the salary this season for Giolito and Grandal with both off the books in ’24, sort of fits with the Juan Soto situation.

          Reply
        • Simm

          2 years ago

          I would do the Lopez deal all day before that trade you mentioned.

          We have Soto for at least 2 more years so 23’ isn’t the in all be all.

          Your trade has way too much risk and what you get back has almost no risk. Even if you paid all of grandals salary I wouldn’t do that trade.

          1
          Reply
        • bwmiller

          2 years ago

          Two years left with Soto, I thought it was one year before he was FA – that changes things a little in regards to the comparison of the Giolito trade VS. the Lopez trade, but I’d still go for Giolito because I think he is the better pitcher and ’24 has a strong FA class of SP’s, as far as not taking on Grandal with his salary paid, that’s not an issue because the trade is no good for the Sox if you don’t pick up his salary. We have a CF in the minors who can hit .190 with 20HRs, he has a good arm too.

          Reply
        • Brew88

          2 years ago

          Gio would be a nice rental piece at trade deadline, when clean socks are 18 games out of first and need to launder

          2
          Reply
        • Brew88

          2 years ago

          Is it me or are NL CFs who can hit a thing of the past? I can count Reynolds and maybe Nimmo, who else?

          2
          Reply
        • Deleted Userr

          2 years ago

          Except you’re forgetting the part where the Padres already had Grandal and Preller hated him so much he traded him for Matt Kemp.

          You’re also probably forgetting the part where the Padres’ offer to Manny Machado was 200x better than the White Sox’s offer.

          Reply
        • Billy Baroo

          2 years ago

          Did Preller have time to even meet Grandal before trading him, let alone start hating him? That move seemed like he asked Bud Black, who channeled Mike Scioscia and said “a catcher who can hit? Pshaw! Away with him!”

          Reply
    • JoeBrady

      2 years ago

      bwmiller3 days ago
      White Sox should be in on this trade:

      Grisham
      Kim
      Campusano
      Rosario

      -for-

      Giolito
      Grandal

      ============================

      My guess is that Giolito + Grandal is not a deal I’d make even if I didn’t have to give up a single prospect. Their combined cost is about $28M, and their combined bWAR last year was a negative -0.9. They should be a lot better, but I wouldn’t expect much of a return.

      Reply
  68. bwmiller

    2 years ago

    Kemp hit .290/.350/.500 the year he was traded to San Diego and was a Gold Glove CF, Grandal at the time only had 600 ABs and was a highly regarded prospect but didn’t hit until after he was traded to the Dodgers.

    That was a good trade for the Dodgers who flipped Zach Eflin to the Phillies for Jimmy Rollins.

    Reply
    • Deleted Userr

      2 years ago

      He was also criminally overpaid, was a clubhouse cancer and lost just as much value with the glove as he made up with the bat.

      Reply
  69. damascusj

    2 years ago

    For the love of Jesus, actually read the article before writing this crap.

    Lin NEVER said the padres are open to trading either, Lin ONLY said that it could happen as a hypothetical.

    “If they traded this, they could get this…”

    Never once has ANYONE suggested trading Kim.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Joc Pederson Suffers Right Hand Fracture

    Recent

    Brewers Claim Drew Avans

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    White Sox Sign Tyler Alexander, Place Jared Shuster On 15-Day IL

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    Diamondbacks Select Kyle Backhus, Designate Aramis Garcia

    Athletics Acquire Austin Wynns

    Julio Rodriguez Helped Off Field Following Apparent Injury

    Astros Designate Forrest Whitley For Assignment

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Rays Promote Ian Seymour

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version