Headlines

  • Stuart Sternberg Has Agreed To Sell Rays To Patrick Zalupski, Deal Expected To Be Final By September
  • Nationals Select Eli Willits With First Pick Of 2025 Amateur Draft
  • 2025 MLB Draft, First Round Results
  • Red Sox Place Hunter Dobbins On 15-Day IL Due To ACL Tear
  • Astros Promote Brice Matthews
  • Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers Expected To Be In On Juan Soto’s Free Agent Market

By Mark Polishuk | October 27, 2024 at 11:23pm CDT

The Dodgers’ focus on Juan Soto is currently directed towards figuring how to get the slugger out during the remainder of the World Series, but once the offseason begins, the club could be looking to add Soto to its own lineup.  The New York Post’s Jon Heyman reports that the Dodgers are interested in Soto and will start more of a full-fledged pursuit “if he’s interested” if coming to Los Angeles.

As Heyman notes, the Dodgers’ deep pockets have allowed them to at least check in on virtually every major free agent in recent years, so if anything, it would be unusual if L.A. didn’t have Soto on its offseason wish list.  The Dodgers are also one of the few teams that can reasonably meet Soto’s asking price, which is widely expected to be the most upfront guaranteed money ever given to a baseball player.  The “upfront” caveat is necessary since Shohei Ohtani’s $700MM deal is so heavily deferred that the contract is worth around $437.8MM in present value, and Soto’s next deal is expected to surpass the $500MM mark.

According to RosterResource, the Dodgers already have roughly $257.2MM committed to their 2025 payroll, as well as a $253.1MM estimate on their luxury tax number.  The latter again puts the Dodgers over the tax threshold ($241MM) for next season, and naturally adding Soto for a minimum of a $50MM average annual value would put the club over the highest tax penalty tier of $301MM.  Since Los Angeles has already been a tax-paying team for the last four seasons, crossing the $301MM threshold would more than double the size of the team’s tax on any overages beyond the $241MM mark.

Of course, the luxury tax has clearly not been a major concern for the Dodgers in their pursuit of top-tier talent.  With Ohtani, Mookie Betts, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, and Will Smith signed through the rest of the decade and Freddie Freeman and Tyler Glasnow both signed through at least 2027, the Dodgers won’t be ducking under the tax line any time soon, and the financial penalty is offset by the simple fact that the team is a revenue-generating juggernaut.

There are plenty of obvious reasons why Soto would have his own interest in joining a perennial contender like the Dodgers, though geography continues to be the lingering question surrounding Soto’s impending free agency.  While Soto and Padres owner Peter Seidler made some headway in extension talks prior to Seidler’s passing a year ago, Heyman repeats the long-held belief that Soto would prefer to play on an East Coast team, all things being equal.  This could make the Yankees or Mets the favorites to sign him this winter, as the two New York teams can better fit Soto’s preferences of both location and contract.

While the Yankees and Mets alone could generate a nice bidding war, Soto and agent Scott Boras would certainly have a vested interest in keeping other teams in the hunt, be it the Dodgers or other potential suitors like the Giants, Blue Jays, or Nationals.  If the Dodgers perceive that Soto’s interest in coming to L.A. is fairly limited, the team could easily move onto any number of other options on the free agent market.

For instance, re-signing Teoscar Hernandez would be much less expensive than signing Soto, and Hernandez is already a known quantity in Los Angeles and a big offensive force in his own right.  Heyman also figures the Dodgers will look to add another big pitcher to its injury-ravaged rotation, even though Ohtani, Glasnow, Clayton Kershaw, and others are expected to be healthy by Opening day.

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Los Angeles Dodgers Juan Soto

Latest On White Sox Managerial Search
Main
The Opener: World Series, Judge, White Sox
View Comments (382)
Post a Comment

382 Comments

  1. Yankee Clipper

    9 months ago

    Might as well…..

    15
    Reply
    • abcrazy4dodgers

      9 months ago

      From Soto’s camp. Create your own economy 101.

      18
      Reply
    • Acoss1331

      9 months ago

      Heyman out here doing Scott Boras’s bidding!

      27
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        9 months ago

        Probably correct but if there ends up being truth to it, this could be what creates a nightmare at the next MLBPA negotiations. Players love it under the theory that a high tide raises all boats but it’s not good for the league if only a couple of teams end up with the very best. Having a hard cap and floor spreads the talent around, which is best for the league. I’m thinking most of the owners will try to force a change. Present penalties have little effect on the Dodgers, Mets and Yankees.

        17
        Reply
        • Blue Baron

          9 months ago

          Dewey: A salary cap is only good for the owners, not for the players and fans. The MLBPA will never agree to one, and the majority of owners have too much at stake to be willing to shut the game down for a full season or longer to fight for one.

          10
          Reply
        • JSantoro

          9 months ago

          How is a salary cap not good for fans? 3 of the 4 teams in the championship series were top 5 payroll teams and 6 of the 8 in the prior round were in the top 10 in payroll. As a fan it’s discouraging knowing that unless my team spends $250 mil plus in a year all I have is a pumchers chance of even sniffing the the WS. There probably won’t be a salary cap but higher fines and taking away more draft capital though to teams that are constantly above the luxury tax need to happen

          40
          Reply
        • acell10

          9 months ago

          or instead of depressing players salaries with a salary cap the other option is that the teams getting revenue sharing money could actually spend it on their roster

          25
          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          Dewey, how about teams/owners work out increases in revenue sharing instead of expecting the players to solve ownership’s problems?

          5
          Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          9 months ago

          Cap and floor. You need both. No more teams doing what Oakland is doing and what others have done and simply not spend at all. No more of that. A cap and a floor can ensure salaries stay high it just spreads out the talent from team to team which is exactly the problem.

          8
          Reply
        • l9ydodger

          9 months ago

          And let’s not forget, out of the 30 owners 27 or 28 are multi billionaires who evidently like their money more than their fans and the team! They can all be more competitive.

          10
          Reply
        • BigV

          9 months ago

          Agree

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          9 months ago

          In theory, I understand but if you take the NFL out of the equation, it works in the NBA. it has to be high enough and the owners would have to open their books for transparency/trust. The lack of trust is why the PA has been againat it. If their accountants agree and the floor and ceiling are established by percentages of shaded revenue, there is no reason for them not to agree.

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          9 months ago

          GBS, see what I just wrote before reading your comment.

          1
          Reply
        • Blue Baron

          9 months ago

          JSantoro: Data shows that salary cap leagues like the NBA, NFL, and NHL have no greater parity than MLB.

          4
          Reply
        • LordD99

          9 months ago

          Perhaps the correct approach is to first implement a soft floor similar to the soft cap.

          2
          Reply
        • steelehere83

          9 months ago

          There’s no point until the cheap owners are required to abide to a floor.

          In the meantime, it appears that as more and more MLB teams TV and streaming rights are taken over by the league, there may be a future where revenue sharing of all media rights becomes a reality and with it much of the financial differences between teams.

          1
          Reply
        • steelehere83

          9 months ago

          The NBA has a soft salary cap. It’s more like MLB.

          The NFL and the NHL have hard salary caps. The NFL though is able to circumvent some of their salary cap issues to have dominant teams because owners exploit rookie contracts.

          Reply
        • yogineely

          9 months ago

          Ok, what about last year?

          2
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          9 months ago

          shared revenue. lol

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          9 months ago

          Not sure where you’re getting your data from but just look at the Knicks. They got Hartensteinbecause his former club couldn’t pay him and then lost him the dam way. Having restrictions balances out the league provided your team is competitive to begin with.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          9 months ago

          Yes but MLB does the same with no arb eligibility at the beginning. Exclude NFL though because of fantasy/gambling. The money and roster size are so different. That said, something has to change. Japanese players now only to play on the west coast because traveling home is different. I also use the next CBA to also include a cost of living locker that balances out non-state tax and housing/living costs.

          Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          9 months ago

          Unless teams share ALL revenue, including local TV money, that floor isn’t going to happen.

          Reply
        • HistoryBelongstotheVictorsInArms

          9 months ago

          Okay. But who should they spend it on? Do we really need another era where the Jacoby Ellsbury’s and JD Drew’s of the world are racking up what would be 1/4 of a billion dollar contracts just so people can “feel” like the owners are spending in line with what fans, again, “feel” they should?
          I mean, who seriously isn’t getting paid anymore? Who on their second contract truly deserves more than they’re getting these days?

          1
          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          “If” is the huge part of that proposal. The (justified) distrust of owners is a huge obstacle to overcome.

          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          History,

          Your last sentence hit the nail on the head. With teams going for younger players more and more, the next CBA needs to get the kids paid a lot more early on.

          1
          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          MLB has a soft cap and no floor, so the owners already have an advantage.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          dewey – While I totally support a payroll floor and ceiling, MLB will not push for it.

          There is an old saying, every successful movie has to have a villain. MLB without the Yankees or Dodgers acquiring the biggest superstars is like Star Wars without Darth Vader, it would lead to a lot less appeal.

          And the current WS ratings prove that out. Game 1 had a 62% increase over last year. Game 2 was up 65%, the largest audience since …. wait for it ….. 2018 Dodgers vs Red Sox.

          MLB’s idea for helping the other teams was to dilute the postseason with playoff expansion, which BTW will increase to 14 teams when MLB expands to 32 teams.

          And remember as long as there is revenue sharing, the majority of owners will want MLB to make as much money as possible.

          Revenue sharing is basically hush money for smaller market teams.

          Plus it’s hard to argue the huge spending Dodgers and Yankees are bad for the game when one team hasn’t won since 2009 and the other hasn’t had a legit win since 1988.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          gbs – Increases in revenue sharing are useless if MLB doesn’t force the revenue recipients to spend a reasonable amount on player payroll.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          steele – That would never happen because the union would never allow it.

          Without capitalism in MLB, there would be no incentive to pay huge amounts to star players.

          It’s funny how so many people here view MLB as “broken” because of the financial advantages of some teams, while MLB views itself as highly successful because of the record-breaking revenue it generates.

          MLB owners care mostly about money, not winning. When fans finally come to realize that, as most Red Sox fans have come to realize over the past few years, the fantasy of owners desperately trying to win championships goes away.

          1
          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          9 months ago

          Yeah like those two financial powerhouse teams the Rangers and DBacks. Your team can spend too. It just doesn’t want to.

          1
          Reply
        • Man What Runs With the Football

          9 months ago

          Seriously? The Dodgers and the Yankees can buy any decent player and just defer their salary. It’s kinda like the first basketball dream
          team in the Olympics. Did anyone think a bunch of scrubs could beat Bird, Barkley,Magic etc? How is it fair to teams like Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Cincinnati to have every MVP candidate in the last ten years playing for one team? I am so tired of the horse $hit that a salary cap only benefits the owners. It benefits every guy that doesn’t want to go to the ballpark and watch his team get beat down by an all star team every day of the season. It benefits the fans because then seats don’t cost 600 dollars apeice, so I can actually take my grandkids to a baseball game. They don’t have to charge 50 dollars for parking. The stars can actually be spread out across the league instead of congregating on one or two teams. How exactly is it fair for Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati to have a 100 million dollar payroll while the Dodgers are at 300 million plus? The union will never agree? Why is it that the baseball players need a union? They’re so put up on and conditions are so rough they need someone to watch their backs? I think I could live on the league minimum for a year or two. Nobody ever said that these guys HAVE to play baseball for a living, if they don’t like what’s offered then quit and get a real job. And don’t give me that crap about how it’s a REAL job. Not on your life. Yeah, that salary cap has killed the NFL. Nobody makes any money, the players work in deplorable conditions, they all drive Toyota Carollas to work, it just really sucks. Get real. During the pandemic we missed baseball, but we got along just fine. Baseball, Football, and especially Basketball are a luxury now, people can’t just decide to go to a game and drive down to the park and get nose bleed seats for 5 bucks anymore and that’s what’s killing baseball. Player Greed, agents greed, and lack of a HARD salary cap. The NFL has one and they are thriving, so what exactly is MLB’s problem?

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          gbs – If you’re saying the minimum salary should be raised, I strongly disagree.

          The talented kids are already getting mega-contracts, often before they even complete a year of MLB service time.

          Believe me, I’m not siding with the greedy owners here …. I just don’t want to see the cost of tickets and watching broadcasts to skyrocket even more because of inexperienced kids getting overpaid.

          2
          Reply
        • Blue Baron

          9 months ago

          Man What Runs: MLB has no problem, It’s thriving as well.

          The difference is that the MLBPA is much stronger than the NFLPA, so there never will and never should be a hard cap.

          3
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          9 months ago

          IMHO, the PA should agree with caps, and a % of the gross. FB thrives partly because the players and owners are on the same side.

          The MLBPA just doesn’t realize that the owners are killing them in these settlements. The players are looking at Y-O-Y increases in pay, while the owners are focused on Y-O-Y increases in revenue.

          Reply
        • Spaced-Cowboy

          9 months ago

          Pressure teams with fines or incentives to spend all the “shared” revenue so that the bottom teams have to field a proper/more competitive roster.

          Reply
        • Spaced-Cowboy

          9 months ago

          Please provide data or links to said data. Parity is far greater in the NHL (until they fix pts for wins) and outside of the Disney/NFL game script for Mahome’s 3peat/SwiftKelce marriage, the NFL has improved over the years. In the NBA, because of roster design and superteams (i.e three players taking up over 75% of your cap space), it would be hard to compare to the MLB in this case.

          Reply
        • PoisonedPens

          9 months ago

          Flip that around and talk about last year’s playoffs then? We’ve all gone through this before: there are teams that put money into players salaries and there are teams that finance the whole team purchase and pay the shareholders rather than reinvest in performance. SD traded Soto because the owner died and they weren’t going to get the go ahead to re-sign him. It’s funny how people around here talk about “small market, small market….” without ever actually looking into what is an actual small media market and what is a large market. The Cards draw fans from six hour radius, that’s not a small market. Same with the Twins.

          1
          Reply
        • 'Tang It

          9 months ago

          That will just cause a cancelled season. I agree that a cap would be better all around, but the players have it good and won’t budge on that

          1
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          Fever

          All WS wins are legit except when there is cheating.

          To say it is “different” when there is a strike or pandemic is fair, to say it is not legit is just trolling.

          3
          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          FPG,

          Yes, I want the kids to get paid a lot more much sooner. A few mega contracts don’t offset the hundreds of players making league minimum. Not that ~$740k is bad money, but with so many free agents getting squeezed, revenues are staying in owners bank accounts.

          And tickets, concessions, etc. are based on supply and demand. They’re only very loosely connected to player payroll. Here’s an example. The A’s slashed payroll the last few years and basically doubled ticket prices.

          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          Man,

          Increased revenue sharing and a soft salary floor to match what is a soft cap would balance things out quite a bit.

          The NFL shares a large portion of their revenues equally, and they still have dynasties (Patriots) and teams that are awful for long stretches.

          And ticket, parking, concession prices are based much more on supply and demand than on player payroll.

          Also, the Return key/button is helpful in making your comment readable vs a mile-long paragraph.

          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          Cowboy,
          There’s already a soft cap, so there should be a soft floor. The owners have been winning CBA negotiations for the last 2-3 decades.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          9 months ago

          gbs42
          revenues are staying in owners bank accounts.
          ===========================
          That’s the way the players want it. I disagree wholeheartedly with their stance, but if they wanted a percentage of the revenue, they could have it tomorrow.

          But they don’t.

          1
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          9 months ago

          The owners have been winning CBA negotiations for the last 2-3 decades.
          ================================
          That’s because their reps are not particularly smart, imho. They have this mantra that “we will never accept a cap”. That’s meaningless, and oftentimes counterproductive.

          If you are at 45% of revenue, and get offered 50% of revenue, but with a floor and cap, then more players will get rewarded.

          This is why the NFL will get their 18th game, and the players will get one less spring training game, if they have any at all. The primary concern for both sides of the NFL is growing the top line.

          Reply
        • PlayedAAA

          9 months ago

          Have you ever actually won an argument?

          Reply
        • PlayedAAA

          9 months ago

          Your ignorance is refreshing in a way.

          Reply
        • PlayedAAA

          9 months ago

          Is that what you call alternative facts?

          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          Played, who are you replying to?

          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          JoeBrady,

          The players accepting a share of revenue would require the owners to be honest about their revenue. What in the history of baseball would make anyone think they would be honest?

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          MLB – I don’t “troll”, I always have found it to be childish and the term to be often misused and overused around here. As for the Dodgers I have never had anything against them, I have defended them numerous times, I am appalled they had a championship stolen from them in 2017, and I want them to win it all this year.

          Legit is a term most commonly used to mean truly or justified. Since most people don’t consider the 2020 season to be legit, the 2020 “championship” isn’t considered legit either. There were too many players/teams impacted by Covid, and the ridiculous 60-game regular season schedule was heavily unbalanced and heavily favored the Dodgers.

          2020 was a money grab, nothing more. It was the MLB owners dream come true, a “postseason” without a real regular season. Players wanted to play a much longer season, but the owners dragged their feet as long as possible because “postseason” television revenue is where the big money is made.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          gbs – I totally get wanting more money to go to the players instead of the greedy owners’ pockets.

          What I didn’t know and don’t get is how the A’s could simultaneously slash payroll while doubling ticket prices. Something doesn’t seem right there, especially going by supply and demand.

          1
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          Fever

          Legitimate means conforming to the law or to rules. 2020 rules were evenly applied to all teams. The 2020 championship was legitimate, just different.

          4
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          MLB – As I mentioned earlier how they are viewed is up to the eyes of each individual. Some people believe the ’17 Astros are legit champions, while many others don’t. There’s no concrete right or wrong, to quote you …. there’s just different.

          Do a Google search of “legit” which is slang, you’ll find the definition doesn’t include laws or rules. Something could be not real, and yet not break any laws.

          Even people can be legit, or can be too legit to quit as a former Oakland Athletics ballboy once said.

          1
          Reply
        • Man What Runs With the Football

          9 months ago

          MLB is not nearly the ratings juggernaut that the NFL is. And it is NOT thriving. Look at TV ratings, attendance at cities like Tampa and Miami. When was the last time you saw an NFL stadium 1/4 full like you do in Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago (White Sox). Even the most ardent fan gets tired of watching their team lose to an all star team that’s bought and paid for. These guys are eventually going to price themselves out of a job. Personally I like to watch the minor league games. The players want to be there, they actually will talk to and sign autographs for kids, and the tickets and concessions aren’t expensive.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          Man – You know football teams play only 8-9 home games a year, right?

          Never heard of supply and demand?

          3
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          If you’re telling me that by “legit” you did not mean legitimate but rather you meant some slang meaning, then who am I to disagree with you? Thanks for explaining.

          2
          Reply
        • rondon

          9 months ago

          Fever pitch… I think the way we all look at this is through a different lens than the owners. They’re like the ultra wealthy who own wineries in Napa- They made vast fortunes in some other business before they ever got into the pro sports ownership racket. And the first question they ask before any decision is- What are the tax ramifications? Whatever we think is ‘right’ is way down their priority list…

          3
          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          Man,

          MLB plays a 162-game season, the NFL plays 17. Baseball is a consistent daily presence, football is a weekly event. Comparing per-game attendance is apples and oranges.

          Median total MLB attendance was over 2.5M this year. Median NFL total attendance last year was under 600k. The 2024 A’s sold nearly 175k more tickets than the 2023 Cowboys.

          As far as signing autographs, how many NFL players do that? You’re being very selective with your arguments as you attempt to prove your points.

          1
          Reply
        • seamaholic 2

          9 months ago

          Owners do not subsidize franchises out of their other wealth. Period. In any sport. Not intentionally anyway. They spend only from the team’s revenue. Which means how wealthy an owner happens to be is irrelevant.

          3
          Reply
        • astros_fan_84

          9 months ago

          The randomness of the playoffs is the equalizer. How many championships have the Dodgers and Yankees won combined in the past 20 years? In a few days, it will be 3. Not exactly unfair. Also, part of the reason the top teams have the top payroll is because they’re going for it.

          I’m all for stiffer penalties, but there is much more parity in baseball than any other sport.

          4
          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          SC,

          You’re saying the NFL is plotting to make the Chiefs 3-peat champions? What size is your tin foil hat?

          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          Poisoned,

          St. Louis is a small market that markets very well to a large radius. Don’t confuse market size and marketing ability.

          Reply
        • Rays in the Bay

          9 months ago

          A cap creates more balance and forces teams to be smarter with limited resources. If the Dodgers buy all the talent and win the World Series the next 3 years, is that good for fans? Not really. In fact, I think we can automatically kick out half the teams because pretty soon, without a cap, there will really only be 6-8 legitimate contenders: Dodgers, Padres, Giants, Mets, Yankees, Red Sox, Cubs… Maybe Astros or Braves. Still waiting for the small market teams to actually win it all.

          1
          Reply
        • Rays in the Bay

          9 months ago

          @JSantaro, fines and draft capital do nothing to dissuade teams like the Mets/Dodgers/Yankees. Only teams that are trying to cut down on salaries in the future care about draft capital. And when the Dodgers can develop scrubs into solid players why should they care if their first or second pick gets taken when they can just buy an established talent elsewhere? Fines hurt but I just don’t think the super rich owners care.

          1
          Reply
        • Rays in the Bay

          9 months ago

          @Blackpink, exactly. ‘poor’ teams like the Rays don’t bother splurging on talent. If that’s the case they should sell to owners who can. I think this can be said about at least half the owners in the league.

          1
          Reply
        • Rays in the Bay

          9 months ago

          @blue baron do you have that data to support your claim? NBA is a wash bit the NFL and NHL all have more parity. There are always teams in the mix but not because of higher salaries given to players.

          Reply
        • Blue Baron

          9 months ago

          Rays: But buying players doesn’t produce repeat champions. No team has repeated as champion since 2000.

          A salary cap is a socialistic solution looking for a problem.

          Reply
        • Blue Baron

          9 months ago

          Rays: All you need to do is look at how many different teams have won the World Series over the last 10-15 years.

          1
          Reply
        • Man What Runs With the Football

          9 months ago

          Considering I’ve owned two businesses I do understand supply and demand, probably better than you do. Here’s a scenario. I’m selling a product at 10 dollars and I’m going along making my money. Walmart comes in, wants to sell that product,tells the manufacturer we’ll take all you can produce and sell it cheaper because they are selling millions not hundreds and oh well, guess who can’t get anymore. Big boys buy all the inventory and I don’t have any more to sell at any price. Dodgers and Yankees are the big boys buying up all the good to great players leaving none for anyone else. A salary cap would spread those players out and make things more competitive for everyone. If you cannot understand simple economics I don’t understand how you go through life.

          Reply
        • Man What Runs With the Football

          9 months ago

          My nephew has 25+ autographs of current Bengals players. All you have to do is ask. Also baseball tickets are 25 dollars and up. Football tickets are 250 plus. A little bit of a difference. Being selective? Nope, just being real and not nitpicking about the way I phrase things. I have a traumatic brain injury, so if you must nitpick please do. Not an excuse or a pity party, just telling you I might not phrase things well sometimes. But in this case I feel I have a good argument.

          Reply
        • Man What Runs With the Football

          9 months ago

          A voice of reason in the wilderness. How did you get in here?

          Reply
        • Man What Runs With the Football

          9 months ago

          Really? Look at football. Last year in the AFC North all 4 teams had winning records. Enough parity for you? The Yankees and Dodgers win over a hundred games and the White Sox are 75 games out of first place. So much equality among baseball teams.

          Reply
        • Blue Baron

          9 months ago

          Man What Runs: I run a business as well and have a fine understanding of economics.

          Try being even more condescending next time to make yourself feel smart.

          1
          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          Man,

          (Notice I’m letting everyone know who I’m replying t.)

          One year of one NFL division defines parity? That’s absurd.

          Neither the Yankees nor Dodgers won 100 games this year, and Chicago is a really big city to have a team that bad.

          Your parity arguments are lacking.

          1
          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          Rays, how about using increased revenue sharing to accomplish the balance you’re looking for? Why should owners expect players to solve team disparity issues?

          1
          Reply
        • Rays in the Bay

          9 months ago

          @gbs Whatever works. The problem is that, unless there are hard rules to force owners to use that extra revenue sharing profit to better the team, most owners would likely not use revenue sharing resources to get better players.

          1
          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          Rays, MLB already has a soft cap, so adding a soft floor should be straightforward, but the cheap owners will oppose it.

          Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      9 months ago

      No way. If the Dodgers want to win the division over the Padres, they need a frontline starter and an inning eater #4-5 starter, they can pass on Soto. They can even pass on Teoscar if the price is too high. A lineup of Ohtani, Betts, Freeman, Muncy, Edman, Smith, Pages, Lux and Freeland/Rushford is pretty good. How about an off-season of Corbin Burnes, Wily Adames and any inning eater with a sub 4.50 era, instead of Soto

      4
      Reply
      • 920falcon

        9 months ago

        How about all of the above AND Soto.

        3
        Reply
        • Daryl Pauley

          9 months ago

          I’m not even a dodgers fan and I like this idea.

          1
          Reply
      • steelehere83

        9 months ago

        Dalton Rushing

        1
        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          Ing not ford, correct!

          Reply
    • toptimrubies

      9 months ago

      I don’t see it really happening. To me he really feels like a Yankee.

      1
      Reply
      • Blue Baron

        9 months ago

        Unless, of course, he feels like a Met. Cohen has more money than Steinbrenner.

        2
        Reply
        • Bucsfan4ever

          9 months ago

          Only if he does not care about winning consistently. The Yankees are far better off in that regard than the Mets. Mets have never been a consistent contender

          Reply
        • Blue Baron

          9 months ago

          But things change over time. And if that’s so important, he should sign with the Dodgers.

          The Yankees haven’t won consistently in more than 20 years.

          Reply
        • Senioreditor

          9 months ago

          It’s been 19 years since the Yankees have won. They’re not a consistent contender for a title. He might as well go to Houston if consistency is his sole reason for signing.

          1
          Reply
        • Blue Baron

          9 months ago

          Actually 15, but your point is well taken.

          1
          Reply
    • A'sfaninLondonUK

      9 months ago

      @Yankee Clipper et al

      Exactly where would he play? Ohtani would be DH, and Mookie is RF. Mookie could move again to 2B but $50 million a year (regardless of deferrals) would add $40 million in tax from where they are now.

      I don’t see the Dodgers paying around $90 million a season for Soto.

      Reply
      • Doral Silverthorn

        8 months ago

        @A’s

        LF, where you hide your worst outfielder if he can hit.

        Reply
    • Niekro floater

      9 months ago

      Dodgers just tactically driving up price for Mets/Yankees. Rather see em re-sign Teoscar ALOT cheaper. Don’t need Soto.

      Reply
      • gbs42

        9 months ago

        I’m amazed at how many fans don’t want a phenomenal hitter on their team.

        Reply
  2. hiflew

    9 months ago

    Anyone surprised by that has not been paying attention for the past decade. The Dodgers spent more in free agency last year than the rest of the league COMBINED. It is not a level playing field. They are good at being the rich guys, but you’ll never convince me that it is fair.

    45
    Reply
    • LordShade

      9 months ago

      Because it isn’t fair. The MLB heavily, heavily favors the rich teams.

      25
      Reply
      • Dustyslambchops23

        9 months ago

        Not really, it just doesn’t punish cheap owners enough.

        The crying by commenters like hiflew is annoying, Dodgers ownership wants to win and backs up that desire with money. That’s what competition is.

        18
        Reply
        • Gwynning

          9 months ago

          Carry your thoughts one step further Dusty, and 90% of the League can’t compete with that level of spending though.

          19
          Reply
        • McGrundle

          9 months ago

          There is the real problem. People are allowed to own teams who have no desire to be competitive.

          12
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          Usually we agree, but I think actually half of the 30 teams MLB monopoly can run a $240 to $250 million payroll just many owners choose not to. Dodgers, Padres, Giants, Cubs, Cardinals, Mets, Phillies, Atlanta, nationals, Yankees, Red Sox, Orioles with new owner, Rangers, Astros, and Angels. No ceiling without a floor.

          3
          Reply
        • 920falcon

          9 months ago

          Honestly, not even the mighty Yankees can compete with that spending. Steve Cohen can (and then some) though, if he chooses to.

          2
          Reply
        • steelehere83

          9 months ago

          Teams that belong on this list as well based on owner’s wealth being over three billion dollars.

          Blue Jays – owner is the second richest behind Cohen
          Braves
          Guardians
          Tigers
          Twins

          Team in a major market
          White Sox

          2
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          I meant to include the Blue Jays and did include Atlanta. The others I am less sure could handle $240 million and break even (I define breaking even as equity gain equals or exceeds cash flow loss, if any, taking into account taxes)

          1
          Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          9 months ago

          No business is in it just to “break even” and these guys didn’t become billionaires by just breaking even.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          9 months ago

          based on owner’s wealth
          =====================
          But that doesn’t work. Owners will only spend to the level of revenues the team brings in. They won’t reach into their own personal wealth.

          And no one in here will either. If you owned a diner that brought in $500k of revenue every year, you wouldn’t serve $600k in food, reaching into your pocket for the $100k difference. No one in the world would,

          1
          Reply
        • User 4014041831

          9 months ago

          An Owners/Players negotiated agreement that minimum 75% of revenue sharing must be reinvested back into improving the team. (In the next Labor contract)
          .
          Could be hiring more scouts, international pool money, upgrading MLB and spring training facilities, analytical and science/kiniseology studies.

          All markets seeking prospects like latin america, japan, korea, europe, canada, australia?

          In fairness owners of “Smaller Markets” have had justified concerns about broadcast rights and lack of clarity on stable revenue streams in the last 2+ years

          1
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          There are billionaires out there wanting to join the club just to feed their narcissistic egos

          1
          Reply
        • 'Tang It

          9 months ago

          Not faulting the dodgers, but it’s a symptom of the bigger disease.

          2
          Reply
        • Dustyslambchops23

          9 months ago

          Every owner can spend more Gwynn, someone has to spend the most but spending the most doesn’t guarantee anything.

          Astros have been on a modern historic run in terms of DS appearances, never been the biggest spenders, but they do spend.

          You don’t have to be the dodgers to compete, you just can’t be the A’s

          2
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          Startup businesses put in more cash than receipts all the time to get huge equity increases. But this is not the free market it is a government sanctioned monopoly. There is a greater demand from billionaires to be owners than teams available to own. That should be exploited to get more for the fans, like a certain number of free regular season games on tv, which already occurs. In any event, I do not think the current system is broken and think no changes are needed. But if you want a cap, you need a floor.

          2
          Reply
        • dodgerfan620

          9 months ago

          But that’s not whats happening. Teams in small markets, like the guardians and the pirates are given $100 million plus a year in MLB tv revenue and revenue sharing. The owners then spend as little of that as possible, pocket the rest plus all the revenue they generate during the year. I’ll start thinking about a salary cap when the cheap owners stop pocketing other teams money thats supposed to go to making them competetive.

          1
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          9 months ago

          Cheap Owners? Let’s spread the revenue equally, and then we will see who the Cheap owners are. Payroll is always a percentage of revenue and it wouldn’t surprise me, should the teams’ books ever be made public, that LAD is not the team paying the highest percentage of payroll. NY, LA, and Boston have such large revenue streams due to market size that even mid size teams cannot compete. The Yankees complain about the tax levels, but it just gives them an excuse to pack away more profit. If you say rich, and poor owners (relatively), then I might give your comment some weight.

          2
          Reply
        • Dustyslambchops23

          9 months ago

          You contradicted yourself and added to my comment by adding Boston to your list with NY and LA.

          in baseball terms Boston is a ‘big market’ team because they spend and atleast recently have created a culture of winning. If a city of Boston’s size can, then most can, Boston isn’t even top 20 in US in population size, but they’ve had competitive owners that have spent the necessary money on premier players to create a brand

          This idea that the Dodgers would be the Dodgers no matter what because of LA is ridiculous. Their market size is a part of it, but a cheap owner, a losing culture would break that down quickly.

          Small market teams receive millions in comp balance payments, they don’t spend more, some even pocket some of it. Their brand stays the same. White Sox biggest FA contract ever is Benintendi, why would should the Dodgers spend less to close the gap between those two teams?

          Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          9 months ago

          Boston only gets 97 million in local TV money, a lot more than a lot of teams but nowhere near what the Dodgers and Yankees are pulling in. The Dodgers for example can pay their payroll alone.

          1
          Reply
        • Dustyslambchops23

          9 months ago

          Dodgers and Yankees pull in more in tv because of fans outside their markets watching, which is a direct result of paying stars.

          Any team that signed Ohtani would have benefited from increased viewership from Japan.

          Reply
        • Van Lingle Mungo

          9 months ago

          The Padres had Juan Soto. Could afford Juan Soto. And chose to trade Juan Soto.

          1
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          9 months ago

          Dodgers and Yankees get more because they own their networks. With that they have the ability to make decisions without dealing with a third party. Just what they wish and the rules applied by MLB.

          Now do they have the luxury of having their own network due to their market size? Probably, but that’s a whole different discussion.

          2
          Reply
        • Dustyslambchops23

          9 months ago

          Breaking even in a given year is not the same as breaking even overall.

          The investment in a team is in the value when you sell it not the profit on a yearly basis

          2
          Reply
        • Dustyslambchops23

          9 months ago

          If that diner triples in value in 10 years, every one with smarts would

          1
          Reply
        • kje76

          9 months ago

          This has to be carefully worded, and there will still be loopholes that slip through the cracks. You include upgrading MLB and spring training facilities in your list. Does that include lobbying, architecture, engineering, etc.? Will the Rays (White Sox, etc.) be able to use that revenue sharing money exclusively on stadium concerns in the next several years? Who verifies that money?

          BTW, internal pool money is tightly regulated. Setting up and maintaining training academies abroad would probably be more applicable.

          My guess is that most of these expenditures won’t please players or fans, because they are largely out of sight. Heck, some small market teams likely are doing these already, and we wouldn’t have any idea.

          1
          Reply
        • kje76

          9 months ago

          Market isn’t only a function of population, it can also be advertiser support. Boston has a number of financial firms headquartered in the city.

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          9 months ago

          @Dusty traditionally $ more than doubles being invested in 10 years. So that capital was going to grow regardless. Make no mistake MLB is a business and the vast majority of owners aren’t out to lose $ annually

          3
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          8 months ago

          Dodgers are not in the top 15 in percentage of revenue spent on payroll. With over $700 million in revenue, to even get to 50% they would have to spend >$350 million each season. They were at 351.7 million in 2024, so they at least got up to 50%

          A team like the Guardians with around $250 million in revenue would be well over 50% at $140 million in CBT payroll like they had in 2024. i used $250 million because Manfred said that no team had revenue lower than that amount.

          The Angels were higher in revenue than either the Braves or Blue Jays and we know that those two teams had revenue of $574 million and $542 million respectively. Arte could afford to be spending $290 million in CBT payroll and still be at 50% of revenue.

          Something to keep in mind is that in all the other major sports, the owners books are open to the union and the players are guaranteed to make around 50% of total revenue for the sport.

          If you add up all the CBT payroll figures and look at total revenue for MLB that Manfred has shared publicly, and I think it’s more than he is saying, the player’s share of total revenue in MLB has not topped 40% of revenues the last 3 CBAs.

          1
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          8 months ago

          Boston is #9 in MLB in media market size. Their actual market includes most of New England which is why they are considered a large market team. In terms of revenue, the Red Sox are #3 in MLB.

          Reply
        • Dustyslambchops23

          8 months ago

          Why aren’t they 9th in revenue?

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          8 months ago

          Cable deals, demographics, amount of disposal income, personal preferences, etc. The market size influences the revenue as it’s a larger potential fanbase. That does not assure any constant % will hold true for each marker, whether they become fans or what % of the fans are willing to spend or there home media package choices.

          2
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          8 months ago

          @Dusty They both pull in more due to having their own networks. Yankees generated $780M in 2023, Dodgers were 2nd with $550M, and MLB average was just under 380M.

          I believe for 2024 the #s I read had Yankees over $800M, Dodgers upto $730M, and MLB avg down to $330M. So yes seems like Ohtani has made an impact internationally. Dodgers games also became available on a few new platforms, so alot of that increase is also due to expanded reach to fanbase.

          Reply
        • Doral Silverthorn

          8 months ago

          @Dusty:

          See: McCourt, Frank

          Your comment is spot on

          Reply
        • 'Tang It

          8 months ago

          This isn’t the right way to fix things. It needs to happen on both ends, but if you just punish the cheaper teams it means that they will have dis proportionally lower profit margins and that will lead to a Cascade of bad things. Since they will never go for a cap ceiling or cap floor, what should happen is that revenue sharing should go into a payroll pot. They can’t pocket that money, it needs to be spent on player development or free agency. If they don’t use it, then it reverts back to the paying team.

          1
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          8 months ago

          @Tang There actually is a floor. With a minimum salary for players and a finite roster size there is an absolute minimum that must be spent. Now the luxury tax is not finite and with a weak floor and unset ceiling it doesn’t really do much of anything to promote more equality in spending between franchises.

          1
          Reply
      • Zerbs63

        9 months ago

        All the owners are rich, the Dodger owners just invest their money back into their team. It’s like a fan of the Dodgers owns the team. Should all owners just keep more money? No a player should be payed whatever they are worth, and they are worth whatever a team is willing to pay them.

        4
        Reply
        • bkbk

          9 months ago

          rel·a·tiv·ism

          /ˈrelədəˌviz(ə)m/

          noun

          noun: relativism

          the doctrine that knowledge, truth, and morality exist in relation to culture, society, or historical context, and are not absolute.

          1
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          9 months ago

          All the owners are rich,
          ======================
          More silly crap. Teams like the NYY and LAD probably have triple the free cash flow of the smaller markets.

          8
          Reply
        • 'Tang It

          9 months ago

          Right there’s a difference between being rich personally and having the revenue streams to support bigger spending. People don’t seem to realize that owners are not spending their personal fortunes on this. They want to make more money, not lose it.

          2
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          9 months ago

          Yes, all the owners are rich. The Dodgers owners are just lucky enough to be in one of the largest markets, so the revenue stream allows higher payroll. No Dodger owner is kicking in from their own pocket. Its team money covering payroll. After buying their share of the team, Dodgers owners sit back and count the profit.
          Still, there is no way I would pay Soto more than Ohtani.

          2
          Reply
      • mlb fan

        9 months ago

        “Heavily favors the rich”…Isn’t that pretty much the way it works in real life too?..The rich having an advantage is hardly a new concept.

        8
        Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          9 months ago

          Mlb fan this is sports it’s supposed to be about fair competition not who has the most money.

          3
          Reply
        • lfcredsox

          9 months ago

          there’s your problem you think it’s just a sport, when in fact it’s a business based on people like you spending money on it thinking it’s a sport, yes they play the game of baseball, but the making money is truly what it is all about at the end of the day

          5
          Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          9 months ago

          Shared revenue. Everyone makes money.

          1
          Reply
        • HistoryBelongstotheVictorsInArms

          9 months ago

          Pretty sure this counts as real life last time I checked…

          And a lot of people in this thread are clearly not business owners.
          And likely are more apt to think the “government” should pay back their student loans while simultaneously undermining the intellect of their neighbors (who just so happen to be footing the bill for their zero market value degree).

          2
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          9 months ago

          “Heavily favors the rich”…Isn’t that pretty much the way it works in real life too?
          =========================
          I sometimes wonder what some of the posters do in the real world. They have this insane notion that all owners, because they are wealthier than us, have unlimited money and can run $300M payrolls.

          To me, that’s like wondering why people in the Bronx don’t all drive Porches. Just because it might be technically possible, doesn’t mean anyone is going into hock to do so.

          3
          Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          9 months ago

          The college system is broken. The answer is definitely not loan forgiveness but the system is broken to say otherwise is false.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          9 months ago

          And likely are more apt to think the “government” should pay back their student loans
          ========================
          I didn’t want to go down that rabbit hole, but what the heck. Some fans have a welfare mentality. It’s always “so-and-so is rich, so he should pay for more players to watch, even if I don’t actually buy any tickets”.

          1
          Reply
        • Ron123 2

          9 months ago

          Anti trust exemption means you can’t compare MLB to the free market

          2
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          9 months ago

          Two concepts that cannot simultaneously be held:

          1-A college degree is the best investment you will ever make.

          2-We need to write off all loans because college graduates don’t make enough money to repay them.

          2
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          9 months ago

          @Blackpink/Joel Well I won’t say the college system is without its issues. They ve learned to hold any future anyone aspires to be through academics hostage only to be had with wealthy parents or accumulated debt. And the cost has way outpaced inflation.

          For many degrees and in many fields a degree(s) pay off immensely over time both financially and less toll on one’s body compared to many who end up doing more labor intensive jobs.

          The biggest issue tho was this falecy perpetuated to all that just go to college and the world will be your oyster. Degrees are still vulnerable to supply and demand. And regardless of how some feel about it, degrees such as Liberal Arts just don’t draw high salary jobs.

          1
          Reply
      • Blue Baron

        9 months ago

        LordShade: “Because it isn’t fair.”

        Boo hoo. Cry me a river. Life isn’t fair.

        2
        Reply
    • Terry B

      9 months ago

      All these owners are billionaires, they can spend if they choose to do so but they all like Jerry Jones, cheap MFers, so don’t blame the Dodger Ownership group!

      2
      Reply
      • Lets Go DBacks

        9 months ago

        If I’d have a billion, I would be wary of spending 700MM on Ohtani, let alone add 500MM of that for Soto. According to your reason, after those 2 contracts my money would be gone. Lesson learned: not all teams can spend like the Dodgers.
        I’m not crying though, money isn’t everything in sports, see the Diamondbacks’ World Series run last year.

        5
        Reply
        • Cam

          9 months ago

          That’s not quite true – it’s about cashflow management. If you give someone a $500m contract, you’re not just giving them $500m today. It’s revenue v outgoings, and every team owner can afford to manage a Soto contract. Most of them are just choosing to pocket the revenue rather than reinventing.

          5
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          9 months ago

          So you think your team would have zero revenue with those players?

          1
          Reply
        • lfcredsox

          9 months ago

          that’s just not true, are you seriously suggesting the rays or some of these smaller market teams could spend at the level of the dodgers or yankees,and they just don’t?, that’s stupid on an incredible level

          4
          Reply
        • Lets Go DBacks

          9 months ago

          That’s not what the commenter I reacted to was saying, he wrote about owner’s money only: “all these owners are billionaires, they can spend if they choose to do so”.

          And, yes, it is about cash flow as well. And, no, I think not all teams can manage Soto’s contract AND build a competitive team around him with that contract AND earn loads of money. If it was that easy, I am sure many would have already done it.

          Signing Soto will not make a team like the Diamondbacks all of a sudden one of the hottest teams in the baseball world and a money-milking cow. Have the Angels been that with Trout and Ohtani? No.

          1
          Reply
        • hiflew

          9 months ago

          No one is saying that lucky streaks can’t happen, which is basically what happened with both Arizona and Texas last year. But where are they this year? If you notice, the wealthy generally get a seat at the table each and every year while mid and small markets have to hope to get lucky that 1 out of every 3-4 years (or more) that they get a chance to get lucky against the rich,

          Reply
        • steelehere83

          9 months ago

          What do you think the Return on Investment is for the Dodgers on Shohei Ohtani’s contract?

          Do you think the Dodgers made more or less than $70 million dollars in revenue from him signing with the team?

          A better question would be how much of his total contract did the Dodgers make back this season alone?

          Keep in mind that the contract in present value dollars is $460 million and is only $700 million if you compute the future value of the payments.

          Think about all the sales of Ohtani Dodger related merchandise in Japan and the US. The increased television ratings and television ad revenue (in the Japan and the US). The increase in stadium advertising revenue. The additional revenue from ticket price increases.

          Here’s a few more things to consider. The Los Angeles tourism board estimates that eight to ninety percent of all visitors from Japan in 2024 go to Dodger stadium. Some go to watch a game. Other just to go on a stadium tour. They almost all buy merchandise when they go their. Additionally, the Dodgers announced that 22% of all tickets sold in 2024 for home games were from people traveling from Japan.

          2
          Reply
        • yogineely

          9 months ago

          They are literally given money through revenue sharing on nationally televised games. That and including the smallest tv deal gives each team a minimum of $110mm that they are supposed to use on payroll, however lots of teams launder most this money in “player development” which can’t really be traced. So it’s actually not incredibly stupid to believe that teams prefer not to spend what they can considering there’s plenty of teams that have payrolls under this number while their billionaire owners claim poor because it literally happens every year and no one knows it while they complain about high payrolls

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          9 months ago

          The Dodgers were over the CBT for the 4th straight season and were over the cohen line, so each dollar spent on additional FA this past offseason cost them 110% of that in fines. Ohtani cost the Dodgers $96.6 million in 2024 including those CBT fines.

          All teams, including the Dodgers, get very little on merchandise. That is split between the MLBPA and MLB regardless of who the player is, so Dodgers get 1/30th of it. That helps other teams as much as it does the Dodgers.

          The Dodgers had a tiny bump in attendance, From 47,371 to 48,657 or 1286 more tickets sold per game. The average ticket price was $52.76, Even though the vast majority of the additional tickets sold were in the cheap seats simply because box seats are sold out with season ticket holders most seasons, I will go with that average price so that would be an additional $67.850 per home game. About $5.5 million for the season. That didn’t cover the increase in minimum wage for 2024 for stadium workers, let alone Ohtani.

          Adam Burke of the Los Angeles Tourism and Convention Board is an old friend that I have known since he was with Hilton and I know for a fact that he never said anything of the sort. He did say that Japanese tourism was on the rise with 230,000 visitors in 2023.

          For 2022, the last year that they released those statistics, the website of the Los Angeles Tourism and Convention Board, discoverlosangeles.com/ those statistics were that 3-5% of tourists from Japan go to a Dodger game. The #1 destination was Disneyland, visited by 22% of Japanese tourists.

          The Dodgers said no such thing about tickets sold. In a stadium that holds 56,000, the Dodgers saw an increase in ticket sales of 1286 per game. 2.2%. If every single one of them was coming from Japan, that was still a tiny percentage.

          STUBHUB, which accounts for 2.5% of all tickets sold on the secondary market for Dodgers games,said that buyers from Japan accounted for 22% of Dodgers tickets sold on STUBHUB. So that would mean that about 264 tickets per game or about 21,000 this season were sold to buyers from Japan.

          1
          Reply
        • Dustyslambchops23

          9 months ago

          The dodgers ARE the dodgers because they’ve invested in their brand.

          It’s the difference between the lakers and the Clippers or Cubs and White Sox.

          Reply
      • hiflew

        9 months ago

        So you think the Pittsburgh market and the Los Angeles market are equal? Those two markets do not bring in the same revenue. It shouldn’t matter how much money the owners have. These are businesses and each business shouldn’t lose money regardless of who owns it. I guarantee you that if Amazon ever starts losing money regularly, it will be shut down before Bezos ever goes broke spending his personal money to bail it out. Extreme example and not a perfect parallel of course, but you get the gist.

        1
        Reply
        • yogineely

          9 months ago

          Pittsburgh owners pocket $50mm and claim poor. Who cares what their market can produce when they don’t even spend what they can to put a good team on the field? Same with Cincinnati

          Reply
        • yogineely

          9 months ago

          Actually, I am wrong about Pitt and cin and every teams payroll is now closer to pushing their tv contracts totals

          Reply
      • JoeBrady

        9 months ago

        They can do so, but they will eventually go bankrupt.

        1
        Reply
    • Luis_Fazenda

      9 months ago

      It’s fair up until the time that the league gets off its tail and instills a legitimate salary cap…which will never happen, because, among other things, the Players Assoc will never agree to it. While the big market teams acknowledge the luxury tax, it’s obviously not the deterrent the league had hoped. It’s only served to separate the have’s and the have-not’s even further.

      5
      Reply
    • FartPocket

      9 months ago

      It is fair. It’s capitalism. Sorry, your oligarch is less invested than California’s oligarch. Their bread and circuses are better because they operate in a better area.

      Reply
      • dm867

        9 months ago

        I’ve said this a hundred times, but obviously it needs to be said again: the MLB cannot operate on pure capitalism. It would fail. The teams need each other to have a league. If McDonalds runs Burger King, Taco Bell, In n Out and Dominoes out of business it’s good for them. If the Sox to eight major market teams run the others out of business, it hurts them.

        6
        Reply
        • Blackpink in the area

          9 months ago

          Exactly DM. They are all working together.

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          There are hundreds of billionaires who want to own a baseball team. The “Poorer” existing owners can sell a stake in their team to spend more. If you want a cap of $240 million, then support a floor of $120 million.

          1
          Reply
    • mlb fan

      9 months ago

      “You’ll never convince me that it is fair”…Life has never been “fair”, my friend. The Dodgers certainly won’t try to convince you.

      They’ll just keep leveraging their 48,000+ daily crowds(and MASSIVE tv audience)and buying, trading for and drafting the best players available. Hate the game, but don’t hate the players.

      1
      Reply
      • whyhayzee

        9 months ago

        It’s simple really, baseball teams depend on their market and teams with smaller markets are at a disadvantage. Nothing to do with the wealth of the owner. This is not a business reality it is a sports as entertainment reality. You can put a successful company in a lot more places than you can put a successful sports franchise. The simple solution is shared revenue. There are ways to rid the game of failure owners and failure cities, you just need to be willing to sell and or move the failing franchises. Allowing them to continue in their stench of mediocrity is the problem.

        3
        Reply
    • charles73

      9 months ago

      A lot of the small teams that don’t get into the playoffs regularly are run by owners who simply don’t want to open up their pocketbooks, even though they could. Baltimore could be in the Series now if they’d spent more money on pitching. Cleveland could have gone further with another batter or two. The Mariners could go far with a couple of bats. Detroit, KC, Cincinnati, Arizona are all promising. If the Rays doubled their payroll, they’d probably be in the World Series every year. Lol. It’s not about spending the most, but spending enough when ypur window is open, and all of the owners are capable of that.

      3
      Reply
      • whyhayzee

        9 months ago

        There has to be a match between expenses and revenue. Otherwise, the venture fails.

        Owners don’t buy teams so they can drain their wealth on a chance at winning.

        3
        Reply
        • mlb fan

          9 months ago

          “Owners don’t buy teams..drain their wealth”…You got that right. Anyone that thinks owners will go into their own pockets to “win” hasn’t been watching capitalism closely enough.

          Even the Dodgers are spending relative to what they bring in, income wise. It’s not like the Dodgers spend wantonly outside their means. It’s not the Dodgers fault they operate in one of the world’s largest, most densely populated regions.

          Reply
        • gbs42

          9 months ago

          Let owners increase revenue sharing instead of putting the solution on the players with a salary cap

          2
          Reply
    • padrepapi

      9 months ago

      Prior to last offseason I don’t think the Dodgers ever spent a 150m on a free agent. Think about that.

      They obviously spent a record amount last off-season with unique circumstances in Ohtani and Yamamoto.

      With how many big leaguers the Dodgers develop, they are easily baseball’s best run organization from having the development chops to draft and sign international prospects better than most while being able to outdraw all teams spend as much as any of them in large part because of that.

      Being able let a 26 yr old ss like Seager walk and get 300+m elsewhere is impressive in it’s own right. Or royally screw up giving away talent like Yordan Alvarez and Oneil Cruz and still win the division year in and out with realitive ease.

      Obviously I’m no Dodger fan, but damn I can appreciate a well run machine when I see one.

      3
      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        9 months ago

        PadrePapi

        I understand your general point. But, technically, in March of 2022, the Los Ange­les Dodgers signed Fre­ddie Freeman to a six-ye­ar contract worth $162 million.

        1
        Reply
      • Mets Era Thumping Soto

        9 months ago

        Well besides Betts and Freeman and Kershaw.

        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          Betts was an extension following a trade, not a free agent.

          1
          Reply
        • Mets Era Thumping Soto

          9 months ago

          Playing semantics to say the Dodgers don’t pay huge contracts is being ridiculous.

          Reply
    • Senioreditor

      9 months ago

      There you go taking ONE offseason and making conclusions. What about the previous season, the Padres spent more than anyone else? Isn’t fair?

      Reply
  3. stingray23

    9 months ago

    Doyers need to park it. They’re coming off like the old man Steinbrenner Yankees.

    8
    Reply
    • Senioreditor

      9 months ago

      Your jealousy is pretty obvious. Incidentally Ohtani offered to defer. Is he the problem or is it that your team was not attractive to him?

      2
      Reply
    • Blue Baron

      9 months ago

      stingray23: You say that as if it’s a bad thing.

      Reply
  4. CardsFan57

    9 months ago

    Sometimes I have to wonder if the agents are paying for these articles.

    15
    Reply
    • Robertowannabe1

      9 months ago

      There are only about 5 teams that could make a run at Soto and the Dodgers are one of them. That is the only thing that would connect them with Soto at this time. I agree that they probably won’t be serious.

      7
      Reply
      • 920falcon

        9 months ago

        Yankees, Dodgers, Mets, for sure. Maybe Nationals. Phillies if Middleton wants to spend more “stupid money”. Giants, I guess. That’s really about it.

        2
        Reply
      • Bart Harley Jarvis

        9 months ago

        So, is Middleton’s money any different than the other teams you mentioned? The Phillies have a large market, and spend accordingly. Wouldn’t all fans want that for their team?

        1
        Reply
      • 920falcon

        9 months ago

        It was the phrase Middleton made before he started spending on free agents (Harper, specifically). Hence, the quotation marks.

        2
        Reply
      • Bart Harley Jarvis

        9 months ago

        Yes, I know that Middleton said stupid money. Apparently, it had an impact on you.

        Reply
      • Anthony maresca

        9 months ago

        Dodgers have holes in rotation, 2B and bullpen and OF that needs to be addressed and will put them close to the highest luxury tax level before Soto’s potential contract. He is NOT coming to Dodgers under any circumstances

        Reply
      • 920falcon

        9 months ago

        Lighten up.

        Reply
      • Bart Harley Jarvis

        9 months ago

        And a deep impact at that!

        Reply
      • dodgerfan620

        9 months ago

        Dodgers needs for next year are SS, 1SP, 1RP and 1 outfielder. thats it. Rojas, Edman, Outman and Pages could make enough of a platoon to fill the SS and Outfield spot if they don’t get a guy they like. Dogders payroll currently for next year is 208 million, so they could easily absorb Soto plus 1-2 other guys before hitting 300 million.

        Reply
      • steelehere83

        9 months ago

        Blue Jays owner is worth close to $12 billion. He’s the second richest to Steve Cohen. Pretty sure he could make an offer as well.

        2
        Reply
      • 920falcon

        9 months ago

        Ok Gen Z, I am done playing with you. Cheers.

        Reply
      • Bart Harley Jarvis

        9 months ago

        Silly boy, guessing generations doesn’t appear to be your strong suit.

        Reply
      • Robertowannabe1

        9 months ago

        ** Francis”

        Reply
      • Niekro floater

        9 months ago

        Soto is going to the highest bidder plain n simple. He doesn’t care who it is, big money talks.

        Reply
    • norcalblue

      9 months ago

      Ya think? Sheesh. This story is a joke and the coverage of it by mlbtr is even more ludicrous.

      The editors here must think that only Dodger and Yankee fans are reading these days. Total non story!

      7
      Reply
      • gbs42

        9 months ago

        norcal, one of the most renowned teams in the league – they’re playing in the World Series if you hadn’t noticed – being interested in one of the greatest free agents ever is a story.

        1
        Reply
        • norcalblue

          9 months ago

          Except no evidence, not one source is provided. This is pure conjecture. It’s a non story

          5
          Reply
        • Brew88

          9 months ago

          I heard a rumor from mlbtr chat that Taylor Swift is buying the Dodgers but will reduce their payroll to $50M

          Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      9 months ago

      Yeah, and this is just the start of it. Imagine how crazy the “Soto to ‘X’ team” will be post-series.I doubt the Dodgers would be discussing their pursuit of a FA during the WS, particularly when that FA is on the opposing team.

      Moreover, Manfred has to first expand rosters to 35 so the Dodgers can get fellow countryman Roki Sasaki (and the rest of team Japan) on their roster.

      Anyway, I don’t doubt the Okinawa Dodgers will pursue Soto, but as of right now, I see him going to the Yankees or Mets.

      13
      Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        9 months ago

        It’s more Jon Heyman BS. Ohtani got hurt and may need to get amputated so let’s drum up some noise for his replacement during the WS as an opposing player. He should just write for TMZ Sports bc these articles are even insulting to NY Post readers.

        6
        Reply
    • LongTimeFan1

      9 months ago

      @BaseballClassic1985

      Just stop with the conspiracy theories and making stuff up. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to surmise the Dodgers could be in on Soto.

      There’s zero facts to accuse Heyman of what you’re accusing him of. Boras doesn’t need any help selling Soto to the best team in the game – the Dodgers who have reams of money and could indeed be interested in a 26 year old stud hitter who’s on Hall of Fame track even at his age. He just turned 26 2 or 3 days ago.

      4
      Reply
      • Luis_Fazenda

        9 months ago

        Yup…it’s the usual journalistic clap trap crap. Throw a dart at the highest priced beef in the upcoming free agency, gather the 4 or 5 teams out of 30 that have a shot at his asking price. Then toss out the usual “expected-to-be-all-in” garbage in your article. Rinse, repeat.

        Groundbreaking drivel to be sure.

        4
        Reply
      • Luis_Fazenda

        9 months ago

        I try not to.

        4
        Reply
      • jt3z

        9 months ago

        Then dont comment on crap he puts out. He’s a known liar and is usually wrong in his articles.

        1
        Reply
      • Luis_Fazenda

        9 months ago

        Sorry bro…carry on.

        1
        Reply
  5. dasit

    9 months ago

    if you can’t beat him, pay him

    2
    Reply
    • Big whiffa

      9 months ago

      They are about to beat them then pay him lol

      10
      Reply
    • Zerbs63

      9 months ago

      Umm The Dodgers are up 2-0

      2
      Reply
      • dasit

        9 months ago

        not because of soto

        Reply
      • dasit

        9 months ago

        1.413 OPS so far
        they might beat the yankees but they’re not beating him

        2
        Reply
  6. swtnes34

    9 months ago

    Sounds like more Dodger salaries being deferred…already $1 billion deferred…pffft

    10
    Reply
    • ATinz

      9 months ago

      Cry!

      1
      Reply
      • User 3594734386

        9 months ago

        I’m a small market fan that likes the MLB model. And spending gobs of money to try to buy a pennant is a great strategy if you can afford it … especially year in and out. But, it’s not the only way. Always a chance that small market team can win it all. Love that.

        My gut says there’s no turning back, either. A new league entity/corporation launched to compete against MLB is an option. Publicly traded. Each team and all it’s on field and off field personnel are employees of the corporation. And make it a World League. Everybody gets a base pay plus bonus pay based on previous years performance determined by performance review.

        Reply
        • User 2478767279

          9 months ago

          Baltimore is hardly a “small market”. That’s just an excuse for cheap owners

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          Ere – Baltimore is the 7th-smallest market in MLB, thanks in large part to Peter Angelos allowing the Nationals to take over a huge chunk of the Orioles territory in 2005.

          Now the Orioles market is about the same size as Cincy, which is the 6th-smallest.

          3
          Reply
        • 920falcon

          9 months ago

          All true, but…Angelos hardly allowed the Nationals to take a big chunk of the territory. They own 67-70% of MASN, which is to say they own the Nationals TV rights. The Orioles and Nationals have equal penetration in every area MASN is carried.

          2
          Reply
        • User 2478767279

          9 months ago

          Okay so they are the 7th smallest market in mlb. What’s your point? The owner is still a billionaire who has the funds to try to acquire the same amount of talent the dodger do. Like I said blame it on cheap owners not small market teams.

          David Rubinstein has a net worth of 4.6 billion dollars. Oh but let’s hear the small market argument again

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          falcon – Good point. I should have used the word “share” instead of “take over”, my bad.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          9 months ago

          Erebus – I never understand when someone asks me my point after I simply point out something they said was inaccurate. They are a small market team, that’s my point! LOL!!

          If the market is too small to sustain a large payroll, expecting ownership to cover any potential financial losses is ridiculous. So you want Dave to use millions of his own money just to sign big name players? Really?

          Fans need to face the facts, the ten smallest markets in MLB simply cannot compete with the payrolls of teams like the Dodgers and Yankees. When I say compete I mean have a similarly large payroll, I don’t mean compete on the field.

          2
          Reply
        • User 3594734386

          9 months ago

          Doesn’t really matter what we think. The fact is MLB recognizes the playing field is not even for some teams including Baltimore by compensating them via revenue sharing.

          1
          Reply
        • User 2478767279

          9 months ago

          4.6 billion if Baltimore wanted they could compete with any team when it comes to free agents.

          Reply
  7. 10centBeerNight

    9 months ago

    Old enough to remember when Cohen was the boogeyman

    7
    Reply
  8. CCooper8920

    9 months ago

    Well it won’t matter to them since they aren’t paying Ohtani a fair salary. Might as well and hopefully it truly ruins baseball

    5
    Reply
    • avenger65

      9 months ago

      CCooper8920: Manfred already has a head start when it comes to ruining baseball.

      4
      Reply
      • CuddyFox

        9 months ago

        It is because Manfred had a great teacher name Selig. He was not all that good of a commissioner either.

        1
        Reply
    • Tigers3232

      9 months ago

      They will be paying $44M to fund Ohtani’s deferred money for the season next year, on top of the $2M in salary. They ll be charged a total of $46M against their cap.

      It is called accrued interest and the time value of money. That $700M is fictious and Ohtani’s contract was strutted in a way to sensationalize him. This is the player who has brought in the most by far in marketing revenue for the past few seasons and will continue to see at least the next few. That is the reason his agent was pushing this type of contract. One that would continue to be talked about .

      2
      Reply
    • Blue Baron

      9 months ago

      CCooper8920: The Dodgers offered and Ohtani accepted. That makes it a fair contract and salary by definition.

      3
      Reply
  9. Stevil

    9 months ago

    He’s obviously going to Japan after this season. His family is there, he’s fluent in Japanese, and insists his teammates refer to him as ‘The Samurai’.

    2
    Reply
  10. Smacky

    9 months ago

    Their bullpen is a bunch of reclamation products that are all hot at the same time. It’s like the Braves in ‘21, just playoff baseball.

    Reply
    • Doral Silverthorn

      9 months ago

      You haven’t watched the Dodgers over the Friedman years, have you?

      1
      Reply
  11. Butter Biscuits

    9 months ago

    Don’t believe this

    4
    Reply
  12. DarrenDreifortsContract

    9 months ago

    Thanks but no thanks! Not even close to being worth the amount of money that he’s going to want. I rather resign Teoscar and sign a starting pitcher.

    2
    Reply
    • niel.marshal

      9 months ago

      Yep, just re-sign Teoscar, sign Tomoyuki Sugano and Roki Sasaki. Sugano said itself that money wasnt his prime target, but the chance to compete in the Majors and winning the rings would interest him. And Sasaki? Dude made it clear he wants join the Dodgers

      Reply
  13. Diggydugler

    9 months ago

    No chance unless he agrees to defer.

    3
    Reply
  14. niel.marshal

    9 months ago

    LOL, How much Boras pay Heyman? Because the Dodgers doesnt not more DH imho

    2
    Reply
  15. Wren

    9 months ago

    i give respect to the mans offensive skill but watching the series his defense is certainly not elite level. he’s doing fine in NY after behind slightly above averages in SD. rather see LA resign Teo.

    2
    Reply
    • avenger65

      9 months ago

      Wren: I agree with Soto’s poor defense. Then again, Ohtani doesn’t even play defense and is making more than any player in the history of the game. I also agree that the Dodgers should re-sign Teoscar. What more does he have to do to prove his worth to them?

      Reply
  16. Lefty_Orioles_Fan

    9 months ago

    Why don’t the Dodgers just buy the leage???

    2
    Reply
    • ATinz

      9 months ago

      * League.

      1
      Reply
    • RussianFemboy

      9 months ago

      What’s a leage?

      Reply
    • steelehere83

      9 months ago

      They did. League (first name Brandon) played for the Dodgers from 2012-2014. He was so-so.

      Reply
  17. CC Ryder

    9 months ago

    Dodgers tampering with Soto also?

    3
    Reply
    • CardsFan57

      9 months ago

      The Dodgers haven’t said a word. It’s much more likely Boras is whispering in Heyman’s ear.

      4
      Reply
  18. Dustyslambchops23

    9 months ago

    Yankees don’t win the division and wouldn’t be in the WS with out him.

    7
    Reply
    • jt3z

      9 months ago

      Youre not getting Burnes, Snell, another for that 50 mil or anything close to that.

      1
      Reply
    • Anthony maresca

      9 months ago

      Bingo well said and I’ve posted this numerous times. Yankees will easily be a better team with 3-4 top free agents over Soto and lets not forget Dominguez and Jones in the future going to be a juggernaut for a decade

      1
      Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      9 months ago

      Dusty

      If the Yankees don’t have Soto, then maybe they have King, Cease and Brito instead

      Personally, I thought the Yankees and Padres both made a good deal at the time. I still think that. I also would not re-sign Soto at $400 million-plus that he will surely get because I see him as a DH in 3-4 years.

      3
      Reply
    • outinleftfield

      8 months ago

      You are saying the Yankees would be better spending $90+ million AAV on 3 top FA than spending $40 million AAv on Soto? I would agree with that. Every team would be better if they were able to do that.

      Reply
  19. AM21

    9 months ago

    Of course they are.

    2
    Reply
  20. Jamie A

    9 months ago

    Cmon Manfred, sort this out. Let one team buy all the players!!!! Not good

    2
    Reply
    • Doral Silverthorn

      9 months ago

      Where have you been when the Padres have done exactly this over the last five years? Machado, Hader, Soto, Bogaerts, Darvish, not to mention rifled through their minors to get players like Cease and extended Tatis as well. Literally everything you’re pissed at the Dodgers for doing, the Padres have been doing for the last few seasons as well.

      Plus they get the good relievers, not reclamation projects.

      You’re laser focused on the wrong team if you’re using that argument.

      1
      Reply
  21. s.drinkwater

    9 months ago

    I’m a Dodger fan and I think the Marlins have a better chance to sign Soto.

    3
    Reply
  22. Terry B

    9 months ago

    Dodgers won’t pursue Soto, they going let Teoscar walk, sign Adames and add another top of the rotation starter! They need a shortstop, Rojas is way past his prime, he’s a backup bench guy. Good shortstops are hard to come by, outfielders are a dime a dozen and Adames is still young, Dodgers have been connected to him for a couple years now! Teoscar will get his bag elsewhere at age 32

    1
    Reply
    • CardsFan57

      9 months ago

      So you don’t think Edman can play short even though he’s done quite well?

      Reply
      • RussianFemboy

        9 months ago

        @Cards

        Edman is not good, he’s not a long term option.

        Reply
        • CardsFan57

          9 months ago

          Time will tell. He’s been above average at short this year according to defensive runs saved.

          Reply
    • Wren

      9 months ago

      Edmans does the intangibles and is an excellent ss option. Without him the Dodgers aren’t on the precipice of a championship.

      1
      Reply
  23. EHenderson

    9 months ago

    Put alot on the Yankees winning it with a bookie based on someone’s advice (doesn’t seem like the type who would be interested in negotiating if the Yankees lose). Please say it was still the right move.

    Reply
    • Gwynning

      9 months ago

      Nice knowing ya, Hendu!

      3
      Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      9 months ago

      Just tell them it was actually your interpreter who placed the bet….

      5
      Reply
  24. highflyballintorightfield

    9 months ago

    They’ll do what they did with Harper, offer him a short-term very high annual value contract, which he will turn down because, like Harper, he wants to chase the largest total contract.

    1
    Reply
    • gbs42

      9 months ago

      As most people would.

      1
      Reply
      • CardsFan57

        9 months ago

        Even Harper has expressed regrets on that contract. They floated a renegotiation of the contract which was not well received by the Phillies.

        Reply
  25. Boston’s Alignment

    9 months ago

    DH is kind of reserved for the next 10 years or so. Dodgers going to hide Soto in LF for 10 years?

    4
    Reply
    • Doral Silverthorn

      9 months ago

      That’s what the Giants did with Bonds.

      Reply
  26. runningwithnailclippers

    9 months ago

    It is what it is (the rich teams are rich and there is no salary cap), but at what point does the disparity start leading to the crippling of the league and lessening even further of the total MLB fanbase? It seems like very shortsightedness of the owners.

    3
    Reply
  27. avenger65

    9 months ago

    Anyone know why Soto prefers to play in the east?

    Reply
    • Gwynning

      9 months ago

      I heard it was proximity to the Dominican Republic and family… but it’s not like I heard him say that.

      1
      Reply
    • CardsFan57

      9 months ago

      I have no idea of why you think he prefers to play in the east. I think he prefers to play wherever they pay him the most. Proximity to family in the DR? Get real; he flies there first class when he goes home.

      1
      Reply
      • Gwynning

        9 months ago

        Oh OK, then carry on having no idea.

        Reply
        • CardsFan57

          9 months ago

          I just found something that makes more sense. The vast majority of Dominicans in the US are in the northeast. Most of them in the NYC/New Jersey area. I can see him preferring to be somewhere with a large Dominican population.

          2
          Reply
    • Pads Fans

      9 months ago

      Soto has said that he will sign with a team that can cement his legacy by winning a World Series. He has never said he prefers to play on the east coast.

      1
      Reply
  28. mlb fan

    9 months ago

    A lot of people complain whether teams spend or don’t spend. Is it any wonder many teams just tune out the fans and spend as little or as much money as they want?

    Reply
  29. The biggest tr0ll

    9 months ago

    This is no surprise at all. I bet the Dodgers sign him too.

    1
    Reply
  30. Luke Strong

    9 months ago

    MLB needs a salary cap to put an end to this disparity where the richest markets can buy up all the best players, it narrows the league to 4-6 teams who have a legit shot and every other city is a wild long shot.

    7
    Reply
    • Terry B

      9 months ago

      All these owners are rich, most of them just prefer to pocket the money instead of investing it in their team…Seriously! Don’t blame owners who are willing to spend!

      2
      Reply
      • This one belongs to the Reds

        9 months ago

        Just because the owners are rich does not mean THE BUSINESS generates enough to cover these outrageous salaries. These guys didn’t become billionaires by spending more than the income their business generates.

        Personal wealth is a whole lot different than what the business beings in. Not sure why a lot of people can’t grasp that.

        2
        Reply
    • gbs42

      9 months ago

      No salary cap, increase revenue sharing.

      1
      Reply
  31. rocky7

    9 months ago

    Of course the Dodgers will be in on every free agent they can be…while they can offer the money, is there a significant Dominican population in LA that we weren’t aware of which is supposedly one of his lesser known wants in addition to being paid…..who knows…but assuming the Dodgers are courting him while playing against him is silly.

    Reply
    • Doral Silverthorn

      9 months ago

      Will remember Soto coming to Dodgers playoff games cheering for Trea Turner, ex Nats teammate. I was convinced Soto was going to the Dodgers then.

      1
      Reply
  32. TAKERDBACKS

    9 months ago

    Probably not but if that happens the league should really be in trouble. No one outside the dodgers fans are impressed if they win. When you buy everyone your suppose to win. The ironic thing is one of the best moves and why they are winning is Edman.Hes been incredible.

    2
    Reply
    • Doral Silverthorn

      9 months ago

      Blows that whole, “buy everybody and win” statement right out of the water, doesn’t it?

      How about “get the right people” and win? You think anyone wanted Michael Kopech or Evan Phillips or an Alex Vesia?

      Two minor leaguers and Miguel Vargas for Edman and Kopech has turned out pretty well, I’d say.

      Reply
  33. Garywally57

    9 months ago

    There needs to be a salary cap in baseball, period!

    3
    Reply
  34. arty! Believes Jevon Belcher Quit on the Chiefs

    9 months ago

    Dodgers are no good at making players. So gotta buy players

    Reply
    • Terry B

      9 months ago

      Seriously dude, Dodgers have one the best farm systems in all of baseball, some of their best stars have come from their system, you obviously don’t follow the game much do you?

      4
      Reply
      • Terry B

        9 months ago

        Don’t forget Karros, Mondesi, Piazza, Lopes, Russell, Fernando, Beltre, I’m just getting started, the list goes on and on and on!

        Reply
        • arty! Believes Jevon Belcher Quit on the Chiefs

          9 months ago

          No players listed from World Series roster. World Series roster bought with gambling money

          1
          Reply
      • arty! Believes Jevon Belcher Quit on the Chiefs

        9 months ago

        Don’t quest ton my expert tees

        Roll tide laundry detergent

        Reply
    • corrosive23

      9 months ago

      Kershaw, Buehler, Smith, May, Gosselin, Seager, Bellinger, except for them right.

      Reply
      • arty! Believes Jevon Belcher Quit on the Chiefs

        9 months ago

        List includes players not listed on World Series roster. Des per rat

        1
        Reply
        • gravel

          9 months ago

          Ryan”s goal post moving service.

          Reply
        • arty! Believes Jevon Belcher Quit on the Chiefs

          9 months ago

          Why include names who aren’t playing for you lmao

          Hello? 2020 called. They said Corey Seager doesn’t play for the dodgers in the future.

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          9 months ago

          If they were not on the WS roster, how come Walker Buehler pitched 5 shoutout innings to catcher Will Smith tonight?

          Reply
        • arty! Believes Jevon Belcher Quit on the Chiefs

          9 months ago

          Are bellinger and seagee on the roster? No?

          Then the list includes players not on the World Series roster. What’s confusing about that?

          Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed

          Reply
  35. sad tormented neglected mariners fan

    9 months ago

    I swear to god if mookie ohtani Freddie and Soto are on the same team I will quit baseball

    I don’t want the equivalent of Steph curry klay Thompson Kevin Durant and draymond green

    1
    Reply
  36. svetlana

    9 months ago

    “The “upfront” caveat is necessary since Shohei Ohtani‘s $700MM deal is so heavily deferred that the contract is worth around $437.8MM in present value”

    The “present value” of the Ohtani contract is $471M, not $438M.

    blogs.fangraphs.com/ohtanigraphs-spreadsheet-editi…

    “Actually, they’re legally obligated to set aside $46 million, based on the rules of the CBA, which is another confusing part of this discussion. The formulaic competitive balance tax number ($460 million) is often referred to as present value, and it’s certainly a present value, but it’s not exactly the same as the way I’d think about it. Instead of using market rates, it uses a contractually defined rate, the federal mid-term rate reported by the IRS each year. That’s a different thing than the present value you’d get by discounting at risk-free rates ($470 million).”

    That MLBPA’s number is just ridiculous.

    1
    Reply
    • gbs42

      9 months ago

      $438M, $461M, $471M… everyone is guessing at the future, so the NPV is nothing but an estimate.

      1
      Reply
      • CardsFan57

        9 months ago

        NPV is always an estimate because it’s predicting future returns on investment.

        Reply
      • JoeBrady

        9 months ago

        gbs42
        $438M, $461M, $471M… everyone is guessing at the future, so the NPV is nothing but an estimate.
        =============================
        I thought the discount rate was based on a government number at the time of the signing?

        1
        Reply
      • Pads Fans

        9 months ago

        According to the 2 articles linked in the article that svetlana linked to, the NPV amount is set at the time that the contract is signed.

        1
        Reply
  37. Ben K

    9 months ago

    “Deferred to when I wonder?”

    -MLB Gandalf

    Reply
  38. Ben K

    9 months ago

    Mets happen to have a hole now at DH that they could happily plug Soto into for the next decade.

    Make it happen Uncle Steve.

    4
    Reply
    • Ben K

      9 months ago

      What would you do in his place this offseason?

      Reply
    • Ben K

      9 months ago

      Would they spend more money to bring in a T Hernandez or a C Walker on top of that? If I do that, then I can sit back and say I’ve done a good job of replacing Soto.

      Reply
  39. jwinker

    9 months ago

    Who cares about whether or not it’s “fair”. Problem is it’s fu$&ing boring. The dodgers are fu$&ing boring. It’s not intersting to see a team continually buy its success. Teams like Tampa (and I’m not a Rays fan) find a way. Thats interesting.

    4
    Reply
    • BigV

      9 months ago

      A lot more interesting and impressive

      1
      Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      9 months ago

      Fussing?

      Reply
    • Doral Silverthorn

      9 months ago

      cry

      Reply
  40. 920falcon

    9 months ago

    Budget? What budget?

    Reply
  41. User 1939973770

    9 months ago

    I can guarantee that Juan Soto will not sign with:

    Houston Astros
    Chicago White Sox
    Miami Marlins
    Arizona Diamondbacks
    Texas Rangers
    Minnesota Twins
    Cleveland Guardians
    St. Louis Cardinals
    Colorado Rockies
    Los Angeles Angels
    the Athletics
    Tampa Bay Rays

    did I miss anyone?

    Reply
    • 920falcon

      9 months ago

      You missed the Pirates and Royals.

      4
      Reply
      • 920falcon

        9 months ago

        The Brewers, as well.

        1
        Reply
        • Dumpster Divin Theo

          9 months ago

          Cubs, Reds, Royals, Tigers

          2
          Reply
    • cooperhill

      9 months ago

      Orioles.

      3
      Reply
    • gravel

      9 months ago

      The Giants & Mariners.

      2
      Reply
    • Brew88

      9 months ago

      Denver Broncos

      3
      Reply
    • JoeBrady

      9 months ago

      The RS.

      Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        9 months ago

        The Bears

        Reply
        • outinleftfield

          8 months ago

          Da Bears.

          1
          Reply
  42. jasonthebuc

    9 months ago

    This is the first Dodgers/Yankees World series in 43 years. So, spending a lot of money doesn’t guarantee anything.

    1
    Reply
    • seth3120

      9 months ago

      You are totally correct we’ve had a good run of unexpected teams making playoffs pushes. Even with the Dodgers roster being a good notch above teams can overcome that with better teams being cold and lesser rosters being hot. But the more and more they spend on the cream of the crop like this past offseason the less and less likely that is to happen. Yamamoto was like what 25-26 and Ohtani is perhaps the best pure hitter I’ve seen and oh by the way not too bad of a pitcher which he’ll be next year. If they did something like sign Soto and perhaps bring back Flaherty on a much bigger deal plus other signings not as big but substantial they’ll either have crossed a barrier where they have so many stars they can sustain the injury and luck factor. If half their lineup went cold in a series they may reach a point their opponent can’t outscore them regardless. I think and hope Soto remains a NYY I hate to say but if LA signs him in my opinion the scales will be tipped near or at breaking point. That won’t be good for baseball especially the NL. The NL West next year is basically assured and the WS isn’t over yet in 24. It’s becoming a problem for a lot of small market teams that don’t have any certainty in tv revenue. How do they keep payroll where it is or expand it when they can’t predict what’s coming in. NYY vs the Dodgers is great for ratings until the scale is tipped too long and many markets turn to many other sports option then we have 4-6 markets spending anywhere near that amount. I’ll admit they may have paid a hefty price but they signed a lot of can’t miss guys. Can’t get mad at them but if it stays the same or expands baseball will suffer until there’s real deterrents for teams like the Dodgers. Big markets will surely have an advantage. Its just to what degree and I personally think we are hitting a point that degree is too high

      Reply
      • Doral Silverthorn

        9 months ago

        Yes, the WNBA will take over and be more popular than MLB because of superteams.

        Reply
  43. cooperhill

    9 months ago

    Oh,for Chrissakes, baseball needs a salary cap!

    2
    Reply
  44. Dumpster Divin Theo

    9 months ago

    Get Trout too

    Reply
  45. rubenc49

    9 months ago

    Ohtani determines the Dodgers’ offseason plans for the next decade. Part of the conditions of him signing was the team making a real commitment to winning every year, so he suggested deferring his salary so the Dodgers HAVE TO spend money on players.

    Ohtani is great friends with Teoscar who’s become a fan favorite (he’s the sunflower seed tosser) and is a positive clubhouse presence whereas Juan Soto is a hot dog and a defensive liability. Yes, he’s a great talent but LA already has talent. Forgive me for being corny but LA has never lacked for talent. They have lacked heart.

    My guess is Teoscar returns, a A or B level starter is signed and LA makes a run at some more Japanese players, and this will all make Shohei happy.

    1
    Reply
  46. Kewldude69

    9 months ago

    This is all fluff. No way this happens. And they aren’t resigning Teoscar either. They hope that Andy Pages will replace him. With that, they still have James Outman and their #1 prospect, Daulton Rushing, has been taking reps in left since they oddly signed Smith to a big deal.

    What WILL happen though is the signing of top Japanese pitcher, Roki Sasaki. Like Ohtani, he doesn’t have enough experience in the NPB, so he will be cheap and has to go through the arbitration process. As you see with them now, you see that you can never have enough pitching. Next year they’ll have Yamamoto, Ohtani, Sasaki, Glasnow, Kershaw, Bobby Miller, Tony Gonsolin, Dustin May… And the IL they have River Ryan and Gavin Stone. There’s also the dude they got from the Blue Jays for Lolz Mitch White!

    Reply
  47. Kevin Illyanovich Rasputin Kubusheskie

    9 months ago

    I love everyone freaking out, to me this seems like a way of one team who would be ok with or without him simply playing poker or bidding at an auction simply getting the price to rise higher.

    Reply
  48. Senioreditor

    9 months ago

    The Dodgers are NOT signing Soto. I’d put it at 0% chance but they could drive the price up and benefit on other FA signings like Burnes and Adames if others back out due to Soto escalation. Their presence could had an extra 100 million to the adventure.

    2
    Reply
  49. BaseballGuy1

    9 months ago

    Whatever team ends up with Soto, they will have over-paid a huge amount in terms of AAV and also in length of contract for an at-best, average OF that will become a full-time DH in the very near future.. As to Heyman, all he does is talk and most often it means little to nothing.

    1
    Reply
  50. SadMsFan

    9 months ago

    The Yankees desperately need to try everything to keep Soto. On the other hand, the Dodgers outfield is atrocious outside of Betts and Teo. And since Betts can play the infield, signing Soto should be the top priority for LA. Yankees and Dodgers are fighting for the World Series title now-will soon be fighting for Soto. Let’s start the bidding at 14 years $500 million?

    Reply
  51. jajacobs2

    9 months ago

    He has said that he would love to play with Ohtani.

    Reply
  52. outinleftfield

    9 months ago

    Soto’s next deal is expected to be over $600 million. That is over $500 million, but misses the point of just how much it will be. 14/600 to 15/650. something in that range.

    Reply
  53. outinleftfield

    9 months ago

    If the Dodgers give Soto $40 million AAV, it will cost them nearly $90 million in 2025 including CBT fines.

    2
    Reply
  54. User 2770661946

    9 months ago

    Who cares

    1
    Reply
  55. User 228032946

    9 months ago

    Can’t you wait till the world series is over before you starting writing about free agency

    Reply
  56. wvsteve

    9 months ago

    Baseball is such a level playing field

    2
    Reply
  57. Simm

    9 months ago

    People complain that cheap owners don’t spend enough money and in some cases that’s true.

    At the same time there is a huge revenue gap between teams.

    Teams like the dodgers have local tv deals that pay them well over 200m a year. While others barely make a fraction of that. Until something changes with that gap there will always be a major difference in team spending. It’s not the dodgers fault it’s the system.

    For those of you who say every owner is rich and can spend like the dodgers you are forgetting this is still a business. Nobody is going to run a team at a loss continuously. The Dodgers can spend all this money and still make a profit because of their revenue.

    Reply
  58. Old York

    9 months ago

    That’s good insight for when I do the Free Agent prediction game.

    Soto to Dodgers – Freebie

    Reply
  59. Heywally

    9 months ago

    It’s interesting with Soto … “were I him” I would just research/id the team and place I wanted to play and then sign with them, even if it wasn’t the biggest $ amount because it’s more than enough money for the rest of your life, regardless. Factoring in weather, I’d be looking at San Diego.

    In fact, I wouldn’t even want the burden of getting the giant 600 million (why not a billion) contract, because of the pressure that brings. In the end, if it’s just the $$$ as the main criteria, then it mainly seems like an ego thing.

    2
    Reply
    • The Saber-toothed Superfife

      9 months ago

      Lol..yeah, right.lol
      “I wouldn’t even want the burden of getting the giant 600 million”

      Ive.never heard anything so idiotic in my.life.

      Reply
      • Heywally

        9 months ago

        Really? In this country, I see/hear more idiotic things in the “paper” every day. Where have you been?

        I’m serious, I’ll take 300-400 million and play exactly where I want, with a bit less pressure and more money available to make my team better. Of course if I really was Soto, I’d do exactly what he does.

        Reply
  60. rmullig2

    9 months ago

    I don’t think the Dodgers are going on another 1B spending spree this offseason. The optics of doing that would be awful. They’re going to spend for sure but not set the market again.

    Reply
  61. dlj0527

    9 months ago

    Doesn’t seem right that just a couple teams can use projected earnings from next decade to get players now! I hope something happens to those earnings and they start to miss payments in the future.

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      9 months ago

      Doesn’t seem right that just a couple teams can use projected earnings from next decade to get players now!
      ============================
      Every team can do that. It doesn’t matter whether your payroll is $300M or $150M. You can still sign players willing to defer.

      That’s basically what SS, pensions, and 401k’s are. You defer a portion of your current year salary in exchange for larger future payments.

      Reply
  62. VA/NC Orioles

    9 months ago

    If O’s owner Rubenstein meant what he said “next year” Soto would be a great get for the O’s and its young core.

    1
    Reply
  63. Sunday Lasagna

    9 months ago

    Only 5 of the Top 20 2024 Teams WAR Leaders were acquired through Free agency. 6 were acquired in Trades and 9 came through their organizations and never reached free agency.

    Spend on scouting and development, better chance at elite players than spending on free agency.

    2024 too 20 WAR
    Aaron Judge NYY FA
    Bobby Witt Jr
    Shohei Ohtani FA
    Juan Soto Trade
    Gunnar Henderson
    Francisco Lindor Trade
    Jarren Duran
    José Ramírez
    Elly De La Cruz
    Chris Sale Trade
    Ketel Marte Trade
    Tarik Skubal
    Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    Matt Chapman FA
    William Contreras Trade
    Zack Wheeler FA
    Cal Raleigh
    Jackson Merrill
    Yordan Alvarez Trade
    Bryce Harper FA

    Reply
    • Captainmike1

      9 months ago

      That’s what I have said
      Management and scouting talent is critical
      But most teams have neither
      Like the white sox

      Reply
    • outinleftfield

      8 months ago

      That is a specious argument since so many of those were traded for then signed long term, high dollar deals with the team that traded for them. Betts and Lindor and the poster boys for that. Most of the rest have not reached FA yet.

      Reply
  64. Smelly_Cobb

    9 months ago

    Maybe they can drop another billion, that’d be cool

    Reply
  65. Mickey Solis

    9 months ago

    Of course! These scumbags will never stop. The greediest pigs on the planet. They “need” Soto to feed their animal fans. Just keeping buying superstars just like they’re buying their first legitimate title since 1988.

    Also, is Kershaw coming back to d*ddy again next year? Can they stuff yet another purchased superstar into the rotation or eventually do they run out of roster spots?

    Reply
  66. chemfinancing

    9 months ago

    Juan Soto is a bad character type of guy. In certain cases I would be apprehensive in signing him to a big contract

    Reply
  67. HumbleO'sFanWhoHatesYourFace

    9 months ago

    Anything to keep him off the Yanks

    Reply
  68. jdgoat

    9 months ago

    We need a salary cap along with a salary floor. This is just ridiculous. It’s good that the Dodgers are willing to dole out so much money to players but just having every free agent superstar go to one team is not good for the game.

    1
    Reply
  69. Captainmike1

    9 months ago

    Good,
    Let the dodgers give him $600 million
    I hope the yanks tell borass to go jump in a lake

    1
    Reply
  70. TB Sox NY

    9 months ago

    I see Soto going to the Dodgers to win a World Series title or a few of them.Just defer his contract just like the others.What baseball needs though is fans to combine their money to buy their favorite teams.Spend said money to produce winning teams.Nobody likes theowners or management of their team.If they became the owners or management,Who could they criticize?Themselves for not doing enough?

    Reply
    • The Saber-toothed Superfife

      9 months ago

      The cities build the stadiums.
      Maybe cities or non profits like a hospital system. Buy a team?
      Why not START THIER OWN LEAGUE?
      THAT WOULD.BE AWESOME.

      why not?
      Mlb would probably sue…..the govt.

      Reply
      • The Saber-toothed Superfife

        9 months ago

        I think it a.good.idea.
        MLB teams pretend.to.be civic minded.

        A.Civic league.
        Go.to a baseball game, support.your community like all good Americans should…..

        They ( mlb owners) take advantage of that concept….
        Take it back!

        Reply
  71. misterb71

    9 months ago

    If the Dodgers outbid everybody else and sign Soto on the heels of a WS victory, I don’t know what other sign fans and owners need to realize the present system needs to be scrapped. Whether it’s a salary cap, a salary floor, a revenue sharing model or something else we haven’t conceived of things cannot go on if this is the next result.

    Reply
    • Rays in the Bay

      9 months ago

      But the damage has already been done. The Dodgers have signed these guys for years and years. They will continue to dominate the sport. The league did not prevent this type of cycle from occurring and here we are. Forced to watch the Dodgers in probably every NLDS over the next 8 years.

      Reply
  72. User 4014041831

    9 months ago

    Soto is really a 3 Tool player.

    The 3 Tools are excellent but defensively he doesn’t get good reads on many balls that are catchable. His arm is slightly above average I guess, not super accurate. He is a below average baserunner, doesn’t steal bases. He was a key contributor when WASH won a World Series but they won because of superior pitching and timely hitting.
    Why wasn’t Soto able to help the SDP more in about 1.5 years.?
    Was there some personality/ego issues, managerial communication issues Tatis did have a PED suspension. Curious? I realize it is a team game and one player can only do so much BUT that is why I would try to build a team which creates the same offense over 3 or 4 players (with better defense and about the same salary) in event of injuries and slumps. Contracts in the length of 10-15 are asking for trouble

    Commenter Gwynning probably has some good thoughts on the matter.

    Mookie Betts is a player I’d rather have or of course Willie Mays, Roberto Clemente – many others like Ken Griffey Jr., Barry Bonds (before he used) IMHO

    1
    Reply
  73. Indianfan

    9 months ago

    I mean, why in the world should they (Dodgers) have to compete on an even playing field?

    Reply
  74. Sunday Lasagna

    9 months ago

    MLB is an even playing field

    Amateurs are drafted instead of open market
    Draft Bonus pool money rules are the same for all teams
    Player Development opportunity is the same for all teams
    Service time and Contract rules including deferred monies are the same for all teams
    Free Agent rules are the same for all teams

    The Dodgers make just as many under the radar moves like buying Banda from the Guardians AAA team as they do major splashes like Ohtani. They also draft well, scout well, and use analytics well too.

    It’s not like they have won 5 WS titles in a row and the game is broken.

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      9 months ago

      I appreciate this. It’s still not even, but it is better than some make it out to be. It is more pronounced this year because it is the NYY v LAD. But last year, it was TX/AZ, and smaller market teams sneak into the WS.

      And the draft doesn’t make up for a $300M payroll, but better draft picks for weaker teams creates a virtuous cycle.

      Reply
    • misterb71

      9 months ago

      Yes and no. Some of the things you list off are accurate in describing a level playing field. But then you do have to ask yourself how many teams can afford a deferred salary of $68 million per season for a 10-year period to a single player. There are only a few teams in the game who can afford such an acquisition unless you turn that deferred money into a much longer period such as 20 or 30 years.

      1
      Reply
      • Rays in the Bay

        9 months ago

        The only teams that can defer salaries are the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees. TX/ARI made it last year because both pushed their salaries to the brink and splurged before likely having a teardown sooner than later. Small market teams have to busy their bank accounts if they want a chance against the overpowered Dodgers.

        Reply
  75. pepenas34

    9 months ago

    The only interest Dodgers have in Soto is to make sure the price goes up, just like teams push Ohtani`s and Yamamoto`s contract way up.
    Soto´s contract has two mayor problems:
    His age (seeking 13-15 years)
    His agent (he is going to dance till he gets everything)
    I can see Dodgers interested in very short term deal High AAV like 110MM/2. No opt outs no trade clause.

    Reply
  76. Pads Fans

    9 months ago

    Don’t count Padres out in Soto sweepstakes.

    usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/columnist/bob-nighte…

    Now its up to Sheel Seidler and Eric Kutsenda to decide if they are truly going to honor Peter’s legacy.

    1
    Reply
  77. Not the real Sports Pope

    9 months ago

    Ohtani structured his deal specifically for this reason. In fact he bet the dodgers would take this strategy

    Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      9 months ago

      Just a snapshot of what will happen with salary caps…. Guys collectively agreeing to go to a team and dominate the sport. It’s why football and the NBA has such little parity.

      Reply
    • outinleftfield

      8 months ago

      This season Ohtani cost the Dodgers $96.81 million. That is his the $46.1 million AAV for CBT purposes and the CBT fines.

      Reply
  78. The Saber-toothed Superfife

    9 months ago

    I think that would ruin baseball for a.lot of.people.

    Reply
  79. leftcoaster

    9 months ago

    Signing Soto would stunt Pages’ career so I’d pass. They should fake interest in Soto to drive his contract up and use their resources to re-sign Buehler and Teoscar and put themselves in a position to make a run at Roki Sasaki when he’s posted.

    1
    Reply
    • outinleftfield

      8 months ago

      Soto is getting paid whether or not the Dodgers are involved in the bidding.

      Reply
  80. balk7

    9 months ago

    They say this every year about every big name free agent, but the Dodgers are actually selective with how they give out big contracts and I sincerely doubt Soto fits that bill.

    1
    Reply
  81. Yankee Clipper

    9 months ago

    LAD isn’t signing Soto. They do not sign high-priced Boras guys to long-term deals. Doesn’t happen because they are smart.

    1
    Reply
    • Rays in the Bay

      9 months ago

      They will save their money and buy Roki Sasaki instead.

      1
      Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        9 months ago

        I agree. I think he’s a priority target for them.

        1
        Reply
      • outinleftfield

        8 months ago

        If Sasaki is allowed to come to MLB this offseason, he will be an international free agent and the most he can get is around $5-6 million no matter who he signs with. Technically a team can trade for up to 50% more than their current international free agent pool and even then the Dodgers would be limited to about $6 million.

        Reply
  82. Rays in the Bay

    9 months ago

    Probably won’t happen but it would be pretty eye-widening for the league. I have to watch a Rays team that make, collectively, less money than a single player on the Dodgers. And the talent level is reflected in that.

    If it happens the league should just separate the league based on big markets and small markets. California teams, Chicago Teams, and New England teams are in one league. The rest are in another league. Then the winners of each league can face off in the World Series.

    Reply
  83. Rays in the Bay

    9 months ago

    The Dodgers will continue to set the market for star players. No other team can keep up.

    Reply
  84. Dodgerfan75

    9 months ago

    No on Soto. No no no. Sign buehler, sign teo if he’s willing to stay at fair value and maybe go after max Freid. We need arms. Not bats.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Stuart Sternberg Has Agreed To Sell Rays To Patrick Zalupski, Deal Expected To Be Final By September

    Nationals Select Eli Willits With First Pick Of 2025 Amateur Draft

    2025 MLB Draft, First Round Results

    Red Sox Place Hunter Dobbins On 15-Day IL Due To ACL Tear

    Astros Promote Brice Matthews

    Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow

    Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers

    Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help

    Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays

    Yankees Release DJ LeMahieu

    Trevor Williams To Undergo UCL Surgery

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Recent

    Twins Acquire Noah Davis

    Orioles Outright David Bañuelos

    Stuart Sternberg Has Agreed To Sell Rays To Patrick Zalupski, Deal Expected To Be Final By September

    Adolis Garcia Drawing Trade Interest

    Poll: Who Will Win The 2025 Home Run Derby?

    Royals Place Michael Lorenzen On Injured List

    Yankees Claim Rico Garcia

    Blue Jays, Joe Mantiply Agree To Minor League Deal

    Submit Your Questions For This Week’s Episode Of The MLBTR Podcast

    D-backs Have Listened To Offers On Outfield Depth

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version