4:25pm: Manager Carlos Mendoza tells Anthony DiComo of MLB.com that the best-case scenario for Megill is a return in four to five weeks. The club plans to have a spot starter on Friday and Montas perhaps joining the rotation after that, depending on how his next rehab outing goes.
3:05pm: The Mets announced that right-hander Tylor Megill has been placed on the 15-day injured list, retroactive to June 15th, due to a right elbow sprain. Fellow righty Justin Garza has been recalled in a corresponding move.
Megill told members of the media, including Laura Albanese of Newsday, that he just has inflammation and no ligament damage. That doesn’t fully align with the official announcement, as a sprain involves some degree of stretching or tearing, by definition. Regardless, it seems like Megill doesn’t expect a lengthy absence. He says he’ll be shut down for seven to ten days before being reevaluated.
Assuming that ends up being the case, that would obviously be good news, as he was on the road to having a personal-best season here in 2025. He has largely been a serviceable back-end starter for the Mets, with a 4.56 earned run average coming into the campaign. This year, prior to this IL stint, he has made 14 starts with a 3.95 ERA. His 10.8% walk rate would be higher than any other season in his career, but barely. Meanwhile, his 29.2% strikeout rate is quite strong and is way ahead of his 24.3% career rate.
He qualified for arbitration for the first time in the most recent offseason and is making $1.975MM this year. He will be due a raise this coming winter but a notable absence would obviously cut into his earning power, so he’ll naturally be hoping to bounce back quickly.
For the Mets, this is the latest domino to fall in a quickly-changing rotation picture. Last week, it was reported that the Mets were getting calls on righty Paul Blackburn, on account of a fairly crowded starting mix. But within minutes of that report coming out, Kodai Senga suffered an injury and was later placed on the 15-day IL due a strained hamstring.
In the modern game, any pitching surplus is a temporary thing, which is clearly demonstrated here. The Mets are now down to David Peterson, Clay Holmes, Griffin Canning and Blackburn as their rotation options. Frankie Montas has been on a path to join that group but his rehab assignment has been shaky. He has been on the IL all year due to a lat strain and has a 13.17 ERA over his five rehab outings. In the most recent one, he allowed eight earned runs without getting out of the second inning.
Due to those struggles, there’s been some speculation that the Mets might push Montas into the bullpen, though the Megill injury might make him more needed in the rotation. On the other hand, Sean Manaea is also on a rehab assignment and should be in the mix soon as well. His rehab assignment also hasn’t gone super well so far in terms of results, but he’s earlier in the process, having only made three appearances thus far.
Time will tell how the Mets play it. Peterson, Blackburn and Holmes are the scheduled starters for the next three games. Megill was originally scheduled to get the ball on Friday. Canning could perhaps start that one instead but they would still need to someone for Saturday’s game. Guys like Blade Tidwell, Justin Hagenman and Brandon Waddell are on the 40-man roster and could factor in at some point, at least until the Mets get some guys back from the IL.
It will be a situation worth monitoring for other clubs, especially with the trade deadline just over a month away. As recently as a week ago, the Mets looked to have enough starting options where selling was a possibility but perhaps buying will become a consideration.
Photo courtesy of Gary A. Vasquez, Imagn Images
Horrible news he’s underrated.
Horrible news would be ligament damage.
Seems to be having a good year. Definitely rough for the Mets.
Mets won’t trade for skenes. Sterns doesn’t believe in 7 year pitcher contracts. Severino reunion ? What would Oakland want
It was probably between that and DFA.
3.95 era
Stupid
Incredibly ignorant, and perhaps stupid.
Oh, nonsense. 1) He was pitching well until May. He wasn’t giving length, but who is these days? He was more than fine for a starter making under $2M. Perhaps the ligament was sore and he was pushing it, hoping it would turn out to be nothing. 2) He has options, so he would have been sent down and not DFA’d. He may be a non-tender candidate if he gets UCL surgery and will miss most of 2026..
@ marc from… Given the way the Mets have operated on these matters lately, they might not even non-tender him. If he gets UCL, he won’t be getting arb raises the next two years. The Mets have been re-signing injured arb pitchers to the same salaries as they’ve made the previous year. They might just eat the $1.95M for next year. The 2027 decision could then be based on how many of the prospects have progressed to MLB-readiness by that time.
He will get an Arb raise, the equation has built in inflation/service time increases whether he missed entire season or ends up missing from here on.
dont forget they also have the ability to lower it by no more than 20%. as well. i dont know if it has been done but it is built in to the arbitration rules and process. I dont think it gets used much as they would just non tender them if that is the case.
@ 16… “will” is pretty definitive. Peterson did not get a raise two years ago. The Mets offered him his same salary, and he took it. Same with Lucchesi. You don’t see cases like this actually go all the way to arbitration because the players can lose.
@ Roll. True. But the reason its seldom used is that the teams typically lose if they try to offer it.
TJ incoming.
Cohen’s a pretty fast learner. And being incredibly rich never hurt anybody.
He needed a rest anyway. Two years off will do him some good.
The Mets should contact the Pirates about starting pitching. Everybody should be available at the right price. But the price on Skenes should be so extraordinarily high that the Mets would be foolish to meet it.
I think paying the price for Skenes the time is now. How about trading Acuna back to Texas for DeGrom?
I don’t think the Mets can even get to that price
Cohen could sign a Single A pitcher to 10-year $250M contract with Club opt-out after 1 year.
Send that player plus $250M to Pirates for Paul Skenes. Pirates can opt out after year one and keep remaining $225M and Mets would have Skenes with arbitration years! If $250M sounds low, just add more money. Cohen won’t miss it! He sent like $100M WITH Scherzer and Verlander when they were traded and didn’t miss it just to get prospects!
Better prospects!
That option would be owed by Mets if accepted. It would not be $ that was given to PIT.
I would offer Sprout, Clifford, Gilbert, Mauricio, Acuna and another prospect for him. Throw in Canning who they can flip for more prospects.
For who? If it’s Skenes as a Mets fan that’s awfully light they would probably need Jett, Sproat and Tong or McLean just to get the conversation started
They want major league ready players. Don’t under value Mauricio and Acuna because they aren’t labeled prospects anymore. They have enough pitching and need position players.
Skenes is just one guy; don’t sell the farm for him.
He could go down like Sasaki and then what are you left with?
Let’s build for sustainability.
Their farm is deep. There isn’t room for all of them on the Mets roster. Don’t trade for it for fringe players but if you can get your hands on elite talent then you have to consider it.
Yes but they still need to replace Skenes and as we’ve seen you can never have too much pitching in Baseball. You also leaving out Jett which isn’t a pitcher and our #1 prospect
I wouldn’t offer him off the start. He would be someone you have to think long and hard about.
Bro what? You’re talking about the best pitcher either 1a or 1b it’s Skubal or Skenes and you get him for 5 more years after this on a min. Salary for the next 1-2 years you best believe it will cost Jett there’s no choosing it’s either you start with Jett or they hang up. Skenes could easily command 5 top 100 prospects if pirates decided to trade him tomorrow
How do you know what the pirates grade each Mets prospect at? Do you think they use MLB top 100 or have their own grades. Not everyone has Jett as the top prospect.
You gotta be trolling now, you don’t need a top 100 prospect list to see that Jett has the highest ceiling of our hitting prospects right now not to mention the closest to the majors besides Gilbert. Acuna and Mauricio are solid players but we’re talking about Skenes they are going to want a lot of high upside guys close to the majors. acuna isn’t that and Mauricio the verdict is still out. You said it yourself they have a ton of pitching already. I’m telling you there is no situation where Jett stays if Mets could get Skenes. You’re severely undervaluing Skenes if you think you can get him without giving up Jett. Padres gave up almost as much for 2 1/2 years of Soto and we’re talking 5 years of Skenes.
P.S. literally every ranking has Jett on the top 50-60 prospect list
Not even close IMO.
Everyone of those players has been a top 100 prospect in the last year.
I would target Keller. He’s been pretty durable.
If Skenes was available at any price I’m certain there would be a bidding war. Mets would definitely put up a good fight. Dodgers would as well.
Of course Toronto would be rumored to be deep in the mix, only to “just miss” on him.
After unnecessarily trading away their allocated international signing money.
Jeez, an elbow sprain?
We all know the next news is that he will need TJ surgery!!!
Idiot speculation.
Mr. Megill, meet Mr. John……..
Yeah, because every time a guy goes on the injured list with an elbow injury he automatically gets Tommy John, right? The level of stupid on this board is exceeding epic levels.
It’s becoming the probably outcome these days
carlos15:
It’s one possibility, but there’s no way to state its a probability at this point.
I understand where you’re coming from, Miken.. But calling his post epic level of stupid is a severe overreaction. ALmost as severe as his statement. Go back and check the articles on this site this year and last. The number of times those benign words “elbow sprain” has turned into “getting TJ surgery” has been extremely high. And often just a few days later. Much more so than before. I’m not saying that every elbow sprain leads to TJ. I’m thinking teams are understating the issue when they first report it as elbow sprain.
geofft:
I appreciate your comment, but stating that someone going on the injured list with an elbow strain is definitely a UCL injury that’s requiring Tommy John is the severe overreaction. How many times did elbow injuries happen that aren’t Tommy John? We just don’t pay attention to those as much as the ones that do. Nothing was stated about the forearm either, which is often the precursor to Tommy John.
Well know pretty soon
Birdie man:
Yeah, but you know guys get elbow injuries all the time and don’t always need Tommy John surgery, right?
Sure, that happens, but it seems to go the other way quite often when they talk about sprains. I’m not looking for an argument here. You could turn out to be right, in which case I’d be wrong
Birdie man:
Usually, the forearm strain is the precursor to Tommy John surgery. We haven’t heard anything about that. Just elbow swelling. It could be that, but it’s just a leap to go to when a guy has something with his elbow that he automatically needs Tommy John surgery. As you say, time will tell.
You’re overstating your case, Miken. A year ago, you would have been spot on. Maybe even six months ago. But that simply hasn’t been the case this year. It happening all over the place. From elbow sprain (even mild sprain) to “needs TJ” within days.
there’s simply no way to know what elbow sprain means, but recently, it has, more often than not, meant TJ. Saying it means TJ is an overreaction. But calling the suggestion ridiculous is just as much of one at this point.
geofft:
I’m not overstating anything. The Internet is full of fake doctors. People trying to diagnose things they don’t even understand. Typically a forearm strain is the precursor to Tommy John surgery. All we’ve heard about is inflammation in the elbow. Could he need that? It’s possible, but let’s just all assume the worst. Do you have any data to support this increase you are citing in the last six months? I haven’t heard anything in terms of an increase of Tommy John from what’s usual. I’d be interested in that data, but still has nothing necessarily to do with Megill.
No, I don’t have data. but neither do you. We’re both speaking to our perceptions. But you’re absolutely certain that your perceptions are fact, and that those facts have not and never will change. I have, as Billy Joel said, given a moment or two to the angry young man.
geofft:
OK, so if you don’t have data, you’re just making an anecdotal point which may or may not be right. And I’m not saying I have data. You’re the one who’s trying to make some concluding point about the increase of Tommy John in the last six months, not me. The only perception I have is that it’s a ridiculous conclusion to say that Megill needs Tommy John surgery because of elbow soreness. Nothing you, or anyone else, has said prooves otherwise.
I’m telling you right now, this is a phatnom IL plain and simpler than homemade cherry pie. Megill has been Swahili booty for weeks now and the scent of failure is starting to stink up the bullpen. Trash juice.
I like the creative use of the term trash juice.
Translate that into English. Wait, just don’t.
I’m telling you right now, you are muted 3, 2, 1
Megill is mega ill
We needed this to be the first comment. Where were you!?
Looks like Montas may not be a long reliever after all. That SP surplus went by the wayside in a matter of a week. Hopefully it doesn’t lead to TJ and we get him back for the stretch run in late August.
This latest edition of LOLmets takes the heat off the Yankees’ June swoon.
Only in your demented, Mets-obsessed mind, Chuckster. Baffling that a Yankees fan would have little brother syndrome towards the Mets but you manage to pull it off.
In my town the LOL team is the little brother.
As well, some people don’t understand dark humor.
And some people are trolls
ChuckyNJ:
You are corny and delusional.
And weird.
For what I would call a patchwork rotation they have done very well. I thought they overpaid almost all of their signings this year but Stearns is no joke.
Megill’s next scheduled to pitch on the 20th. Tidwell, who last pitched on the 15th, which would line up well from a scheduling point of view. Waddell is the announced starter for Syracuse tonight, so would seemingly be unavailable if the Mets follow through with that. Montas and Hagenman both pitched on the 13th and would be going on 6 days rest instead of 4 or 5.
In 10 years all MLB teams will have 7 man rotations.
How? They can’t keep 5 healthy now!
Rotation implies that they will actually rotate.
Kinda of suspected something was going on by the way his performance was tailing off, throwing harder this year and then struggling with control on and off from awesome pitches.
Good guy let’s hope it’s not serious. There is a lot of pressure for these guys on the bubble of starting to not go overboard when they get their chance and throw just that much harder.
Too easy to second guess and say stay within yourself and pitch to your capability and stay healthy
just a thought… Mets have too many starters… Sean Manaea and Frankie Montas need roster spots….this just might be roster juggling.
@Keith Nah, doesn’t really add up. Look at all of the facts, and not just cherry-pick the ones that tickle your impulse.
Montas was not scheduled to be called up for another week, and Manaea is a couple of weeks behind him. Plus, the Mets had received trade interest for Paul Blackburn as of a week ago. If this is roster shuffling, why now, when they don;t even have someone to clearly take Megill’s next start??
I concede the interest in Blackburn may have evaporated with his last start, but it was there just a day or two before. And why resort to phantom-injury-roster-shuffling when we’re right on the edge of trade season and you can get something of need for your surplus?
Sounds like we could see Brandon Sproat soon.
@ ShagFoo why would we see Brandon Sproat who struggled for much of the season and is just getting his footing in AAA now when we have other depth pieces available and already on the 40-man roster?
Why cut three players to make room on that 40-man for Sproat, Manaea, and Montas?
I know why. Because fanboys get too excited over speculative premature scouting reports about what Sproat could be in the future to see what and where he is right now.
He probably watches milb games on his phone and thinks he is an expert on minor league pitching development.
Need Montas and Manaea back ASAP.
Might explain his pitching struggles. Hopefully Manaea and Montas return on time.
Most likely Mets will stay in house for starters and trade for high leverage relievers to lock down innings 6 through 9. Either that or teach sterling marte how to throw the ephus
All of a sudden that abundance of SP options the Mets had ten days ago is now coming in handy and will be tested. Not a big fan of Canning or Blackburn, but each is capable of holding down the fort until the IL pitchers return.
I’d like to see Mauricio be given a 20-game uninterrupted stay at 2B. Let’s see what we have with this guy. All the nightly shuffling with him, McNeil, Vientos, Baty and Acuna needs to stop.
I’d also bat Mauricio second to take advantage of his speed. My lineup for those aforementioned 20 games, barring injuries, is as follows.
McNeil CF
Mauricio 2B
Lindor SS
Sosa RF
Alonso
Nimmo LF
Marte DH
Vientos/Baty 3B
Alvarez/Torrens C
Agree Mauricio needs stability and playing time
Test
Test II