The Padres are getting calls on their high leverage relievers, according to to a report from Kevin Acee of The San Diego Union-Tribune yesterday afternoon. Mason Miller, Adrian Morejon, Jeremiah Estrada, and David Morgan have all drawn interest from rival clubs, per Acee, though the report emphasizes that while the Padres have fielded calls on those players they aren’t inclined to move anyone from that group.
“There’s a lot of teams (from which) we have taken incoming calls,” president of baseball operations AJ Preller told reporters, as relayed by Acee. “…It’s nice when people are calling you, and they have interest in your players. At least then, you have some options. But I think the focus has been on the starting pitching and how do we fill that without taking away from the bullpen or from the lineup.”
Preller went on to double down on his desire to keep his team’s elite bullpen together.
“Anytime you have multiple people in one spot, you at least can listen to those types of conversations,” Preller said, per Acee. “But it’s not easy to find impact players, so you don’t take that for granted. And we have a lot of performers in our pen that have been impactful here the last couple years. It’s probably been why we’ve been in the playoffs the last few years. There’s a lot of reasons, but that’s been a big one. … So we don’t take that lightly. It’s not like, ‘Hey, we have a lot of really good pitchers, so we can afford to kind of take our level down in the bullpen.’”
That’s an understandable stance to take. San Diego had MLB’s best bullpen by ERA, xERA, and fWAR in 2025. Granted, that’s with Robert Suarez in the fold, but it also only accounts for half a season of Miller’s impact. While trading from that strength could make some sense to improve a rotation that’s losing Dylan Cease and Michael King, it’s worth remembering that none of the team’s top relievers has an especially high salary; Estrada and Morgan will play next year on a pre-arbitration salary, while Morejon and Miller are projected to make a combined $7MM total via arbitration in 2026 by MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz. With such negligible salaries, trading any of that quartet wouldn’t open up the sort of payroll space necessary to land an impactful starter.
Reluctant as the club may be to trade from its bullpen, the Padres do find themselves in a bind at this point. Acee notes that San Diego needs to add at least two starters this offseason to replace King and Cease, and the club is known to be planning to spend at a similar level to last year. Perhaps the team’s reported willingness to move players making more significant salaries like Jake Cronenworth and Nick Pivetta will allow them to shed the sort of salary needed to add a starter or two in free agency.
Failing that, however, it’s not inconceivable that the Padres could trade a reliever for a starter. The Marlins notably have starting pitchers (including Edward Cabrera and former Padre Ryan Weathers) that they’re willing to trade this winter, and are known to be in the market for a closer this winter. Bringing someone like Morejon or Estrada into the fold as the primary piece of the return for a starter’s services could allow Miami to bring in the closer they’re looking for without having to pay a premium for someone like Suarez or Pete Fairbanks on the open market.
As the Padres look to upgrade their rotation mix, Acee continues to report that Preller’s front office is working on a “blockbuster” trade. Neither the names involved in those discussions nor the other team (or teams) Preller is negotiating with are named, but Acee does emphasize that the Padres will not be trading Fernando Tatis Jr. this winter. While a Tatis trade would clear significant salary off the books and surely bring in a massive return, Tatis has shown himself to be a consistent five-to-six win player when healthy and losing him would be a brutal blow to the Padres’ goal of keeping their competitive window open headed into 2026. Tatis may not be on the move this winter, but Preller’s willingness to get creative and aggressive on the trade market make it impossible to completely rule out a trade involving virtually any other player on the roster or in the farm system.

They probably could also add an extra piece to that pen via a trade of one of the guys that have been mentioned like Pivetta or Croenworth.
With mad man Preller it’s hard to know what he is thinking. What we do know is if you’re a minor leaguer in the Padres system you should have your bags packed. I get the system is pretty drained but there are still some dudes with value still in it.
Padres are a weird team that both buys and sells a lot. I think right now there in more of a sell major league pieces mode to both restock the system and the MLB team. It’s why a guy like Tatis is a good sell, you can get 4-5 pieces and do both.
I just don’t see them trading Tatis. Not that your wrong point but wise.
Probably not, but you never know lol!
Padres FO came out publicly yesterday reiterating they won’t trade Tatis. I somewhat believe them.
Where’s the fun it that?! lol
I can see Preller trading Bogaerts and Mason Miller to the Red Sox for some cheap SP’s. It makes too much sense not to.
Miller is a FA in 2030.
Padres will very likely keep hiim until ’28 or ’29
At that point, the Padres could still land a very generous package of major league talent/major league ready top prospects for Mason Miller in ’28 or ’29.
Padres have already added 2 bullpen arms this offseason.
Yeah, about those…meh?
Great stuff. No MLB results to speak of. They did add them both on major league deals. I would not have been happy if the Sox added those two, but then the Sox need guys at the top of the pen.
Yeah, it’s odd they added them a such, hope it works out, but like you I wouldn’t have been happy if my team did them and called it a day.
The padres had the best bullpen in the mlb and it’s partly from finding pieces off the scrap heap and turning them into real contributors. Jeremiah Estrada was dfa’d by the cubs. Kolek was a rule 5 guy. A few guys debuted last season for the first time out of the padres system. These new players the padres signed are for minimal salary and almost no risk. Your bullpen can’t add these guys because it’s probably not close to as good as the padres bullpen is but they are like the 7th or lower reliever in the bullpen for padres. They can drop them and it won’t affect them at all.
The Red Sox had the 2nd best bullpen in baseball. Both of these pitchers would be depth in the Sox system, not anyone they have to count on in the pen.
The Padres can drop both of these guys without much cost but they still tie up a 40 man roster spot until then.
Yeah I’m with Baseball here. I’m a NYY fan and while we had some pen issues last season, Cashman consistently puts together good to great ones. He too likes dumpster diving sometimes, but usually those guys have a bit more of a portfolio already. The two added here would have been minor league spring training invites not straight adds.
Padres have plenty of 40 man room.
The padres are at 36 after these moves. We have room for pitchers and a Big bat especially if they make a trade.
I didn’t realize how much room they had. Just 35 on it after adding Acosta and Adcock. Preller must have some big moves planned or players he really believes will make the jump.
I think it’s part of the plan. Bigger money falls off -> give a qo -> get a draft pick/ money off books/room on the 40. The last few seasons we have had the most (or one of the most) room on the 40 than any other team this time of year.
I think there’s a lot more smoke to the trade rumors then. That or interesting signings. That’s a good amount of space and Preller was already talking big moves.
Padres not inclined ba ba ba
The Pivetta stuff still feels odd that he could be dealt. Padres need starting pitching. 2 starters but trading Pivetta would mean they need 3 starters. This feels a lot like the Cease trade rumors a year ago.
Not sure what to make of this blockbuster trade idea. If they aren’t trading Tatis or their high end pen arms who is gonna headline that blockbuster?
I would think trading Merrill is off the table even more than Tatis. Manny and Xander are nearly impossible to trade. At least without eating a ton of cash and then opening up another hole. Plus they both have full no trade clauses to make even more difficult.
Hard to see any deal with cronenworth involved being a blockbuster.
I guess Pivetta and minor leaguers for who knows what could be considered a blockbuster. Would seem like one step forward and one step backwards.
That’s about the only thing I can see, some sort of swap like that for a cheap
It would have to be to a contender. Yankees? come to mind of a team that might do a pivetta and prospects trade for a younger controlled starter. Yankees need a starter to at least get by the first month or so. Perhaps the O’s? Angles?
Guess trading a Pivetta for prospects then flipping them along with other current Padres prospects for pitching could work (saving 20m) if for a league min controlled starter. Followed by spending the pivetta money (20m) and their other 20-30m (total of 40-50m) on two pitchers. Sounds like the most logical option in this case. Would bring back 3 starters in total.
Could see a cronenworth and prospects to the pirates for Keller or prospects to the Nats for Gore.
A puzzle somewhere that I am sure Preller is trying to solve. He likely would have multiple trades lined up that triggers a dominoe of moves.
Im guessing hes going to try and bring Gore back. He never wanted to trade him, was emotional when he had to include him in that trade.
@Simm. Yea if they’re not trading from pen (Estrada would be the likely guy) and not Tatis (as they publicly said yesterday), and they need Pivetta more than anyone, I can’t fathom a Big Trade or blockbuster deal being remotely possible. Yesterday Jon Shaeffer pressed Kevin on the radio and Acee really backpedaled on the likelihood. He’s never revealed his sources nor explained well the context.
97.3 the fan is this morning says the blockbuster they are hearing from sources is…
Xander and Miller plus
For Francisco Lindor.
Don’t kill the messenger.
I heard Lindor was involved some rumors with SD. Maybe Cohen would be happy with Bogey and Estrada instead, ha
Woods of Ben and woods said his source told him this has legs
Lindor contract is thru 2031. Bogey is through 2033 I believe. So they get 2 years of salary relief. It could have legs but then is in direct conflict with this mlbtr article and quotes from AJ. Also doesn’t help with critical SP needs.
Simm-Not buying it. Type in “Lindor Padres” in a search, and you’ll see it likely came from one of the bs IG pages that puts out fake rumors. Bet that’s where they got it from. Haven’t heard it from any reputable insiders.
Brew-IF there are any legs to that rumor, you’d have to assume it would be a bigger package, and would involve 1-2 starters/starting pitching prospects.
Woods does have sources in the padres org. He doesn’t spread rumors without believing the source. He isn’t on IG spreading nonsense.
The rumor of a Lindor trade surfaced last season when accounts of a strained relationship between him and Soto were flying about. Lindor himself refuted this however. But who knows what’s really going on now. Not much buzz in NY media outlets and podcasters about this that I can find.
from sOuRcEs
I’ve seen better legs on a table
Some table legs can look pretty nice.
@Simm & @Brew88
I’m sure the “ask” would be Xander and Miller (or maybe even Cronie and Miller), but the counter would surely be Xander & Estrada. Moving Xander’s money would be huge. I’m not gonna even bother looking at Lindor’s contract, cause it’s probably as heavy a lift as Xander.
re: “Also doesn’t help with critical SP needs.”
Yeah, I agree. However that trade might be eventually configured, it just has to either return an MLB ready starters, or pieces and cash that will add up to a starter in another move. (Hence, my earlier speculation about multi-team trades …)
It’ll just be very hard for Preller to find his starters without more cash from ownership, or moving salary in a trade. He’s done it before. If he does it again this year, we can truly crown AJP with the nickname of “The Magician”. 🤣
Probably a proposal from a Mets fan.
Miller is worth more than Lindor straight up.
Mason Miller has very low salary, is a dominant All Star closer and not a free agent until 2030.
Padres would have no interest in Lindor’s massive contracts with 205M left on it @ 34M per year.
If the Mets want to make a serious offer for Mason Miller
then it starts with Nolan McLean, Carson Benge and Brandon Sprout.
Padres are looking for younger, cost controlled top young talented major leaguers and/or major league ready top prospects.
If the Mets are interested in Xander Bogaerts, then I am sure the Padres would listen to that proposal.
Really like Lindor, but the Padres are looking for a younger shortstop and have a few preculating in the minors too.
Starters can be found. Top relievers are expensive.
Estrada could net the Padres 2-3 talented young mlb pitchers and/or major league ready highly rated prospects.
@Simm
“blockbuster” could mean a lot of different things. Such as, multi-team trade. I see that as more likely, a trade with multiple players moving in different directions, including MLB talent and prospects ~~ IF ~~ Preller’s running the “blockbuster” Padre play book this winter.
Reports on blockbuster was a bigger one than the Soto trade. Bigger than that last two deadline deals.
It would require some big names being moved.
Now this is just rumors and as Preller says most never happen.
It’s Acee. Have to take it with a grain of salt.
Had an interesting conversation with a colleague a couple of days ago who pointed out that the 2025 ERA’s of the pitchers certain to return to the Padres bullpen is lower without Suarez. That is how good they were. I was blown away.
His hard hit rate was highest in his career in 25, and his expected ERA was a half run higher than his actual. I like Suarez but his his good fortune might run out…but he’ll cash in first and good for him!
Kevin Acee walked back his “bigger than Soto” stuff on the radio yesterday. Im convinced his contacts in the front office are the cook and the janitor. “Ms. Lippy’s car is green”.
Acee has admitted himself that Padres FO has lost trust in him after the hit pieces and he doesn’t have the direct lines of communication that he used to. Which makes being a beat writer a challenge. So janitor, dream, or Matt Siedler’s drunken second cousin more likely.
Acee has very good sources with Padres according to an analysis of all available info on the internet by AI
AI Overview
Yes, Kevin Acee (presumably the “Acee” you are referring to), a prominent sports reporter for The San Diego Union-Tribune, is widely recognized as having excellent and frequent sources within the San Diego Padres’ front office and ownership group.
His reporting consistently features insights and direct quotes from key personnel, and he is often the first to break significant news and rumors regarding the team’s operations.
Evidence of Acee’s Strong Connections:
Exclusive Information: Acee frequently publishes articles citing “multiple sources” or “two sources familiar with the Padres’ discussions” on sensitive topics like potential blockbuster trades, payroll decisions, and managerial changes.
Direct Access: He has reported on official statements and held interviews with high-level staff, including Padres Chairman John Seidler and President of Baseball Operations A.J. Preller.
Breaking News: News of major organizational decisions, such as the Seidler family exploring the sale of the team or the hiring of a new manager, often breaks first or is confirmed through his reporting.
Insider Insight: Other sports media outlets, such as MLB Trade Rumors and Yahoo Sports, frequently cite Acee’s reporting as the primary source for their own coverage of Padres rumors and news, underscoring his credibility and access
Teams, businesses, organizations often float “trial balloons” in the public to measure public interest and opinions.
Then, at times, they team or orga may “do a 180” and change course/plans like the Padres did with spending money a few times, trading players or not trading players, resigning players or not, keeping the team or putting it on the market for sale etc…
Just because they change course on decisions, it does not make Kevin Acee wrong or mean he is getting bad info.
It may mean that the Padres sent out trial ballon(s) with Acee to judge public and fan reaction, then the team decisionmakers did a 180 and decided to go in different direction.s) multiple times.
It does show the Padres ownership situation is in flux and could be subject to change when situations and decisions are yo yo ing back and forth on key decisions.
That is not the fault of Acee, That just means the situation and decisionmaking is very fluid and subject to change. He is just doing his job.
And, the Padres have rewarded Acee with exclusives on some very major decisions also. So, the Padres do consider Acee an ally in many ways or he would not be getting exclusives and insider access to Padres decisionmakers.
Pivetta has an opt out after this season.
“If” he’s traded it will be to add a SP with more control.
I think that’s the plan and in Niebla we trust. Then you go get 1 more pitcher from free agency/trade. And after that you have a bunch of lesser guys and choose the best among them in spring training stuff results. Sears/Waldron/hart/the other guy from soto trade not vasquez but his name is escaping me but I think he had tj last year
Brito
Yep that’s him. I really want him to come back and be good.
he should not be forgotten but healthy apparently, young still with upside talent. Another guy who could make a diff this year also lost in the weeds is Hoeing
I think Hoeing was hurt all of last year i hope he is healthy and can be our long guy (as opposed to our mop up)
RLOL!
Niebla’s the best MLB player on the Padres roster.
That’s “player” in quotes. His impact in building young pitchers is legend amongst two teams. I think that he’s Preller’s ace-in-the-hole when it comes to solving pitching problems, like they’re again facing for 2026.
(You can quote me on that first statement.).😏
Miguel Mendez has broken through as the next “fast track” minor league starter who could see Padres rotation time in 2026.
If they Padres can get two young major league and/or major league ready starters plus a multi position, young infielder who can hit in an Estrada deal, then it may be a good deal to make.
mlb.com/milb/prospects/padres/miguel-mendez-700280
are they inclined to start the year with Vásquez as their SP3? and, that’s *if* Musgrove is all the way back after missing an entire year.
buddy, you’re gonna have to be inclined to do something and if it doesn’t involve bargaining from your only position of strength, then…
Padres are already Cooked. It’s hard being the red headed stepchild in that division. I get it
Hmm, I think that ugly red-headed stepchild, at least at this point, would be the Rockies. In the NL West, calling the Pads the “stepchild”, means that the stepchild is kicking a**.
Thank you for using the wording “high leverage.” Just “leverage” is meaningless since ever situation has some amount of leverage.
as opposed to the low-suffrage situations
I can see Preller trading Mason Miller and Bogaerts to the Yankees for whatever prospects Preller could get. The main reason for the trade is to dump Bogaerts and use the savings to get SP’s. Miller would be what gets the deal done. Yankees could really use a Mason Miller in their bullpen.
If Preller did trade Bogaerts it would go a long ways in explaining the Padres reported interest in CF Brenton Doyle.. Merrill could be moved to SS. One possible impediment is Bogaert’s no-trade clause. And how do you convince an ex-Red Sox like Bogaerts to go play with the Yankees? lol
I can’t see it because your trash “journalists” would have already leaked it. No one has yankees trading with padres in rumors. If a massive trade happens it needs to happen soon because of how much pitching padres need along with padres being potentially in japanese players if they free up $ and their posting window is up soon
Not happening.
Padres may, at some point, move Bogaerts..
But, Padres would only do that after Bogaerts has an outstanding year.
Padres are not “selling low” on Bogaerts.
Mason Miller won’t be traded until ’28 or ”29.
Miller is dirt cheap for the next four years. Trading him would make no sense. The Padres still have $30ish million to spend (according to their CFO). Surely Preller will find two starters who can slot into the 3rd and 4th spots. We just have to hope that Musgrove is his old self.
Smartest play would be to trade Tatis Jr for a “Kings Ransome”.
“Reluctant as the club may be” is NOT proper English. You can’t just leave “as” out to start the sentence because you feel like it. Proper grammar isn’t optional.