Since former owner Peter Seidler passed away in November 2023, the Padres have cut back on the sky-high spending the team became known for during Seidler’s quest to bring a World Series to San Diego. After finishing the 2023 season with a 40-man payroll of roughly $257.2MM, that number was reduced to just under $172MM in 2024, before bouncing back up to roughly $221MM in 2025. (All numbers via Cot’s Baseball Contracts, though RosterResource had the Padres’ 2025 payroll at around $211.1MM.)
The question going into next season, naturally, is just how much the team has available to spend, and the answer appears to be that same $211MM-$221MM range. “We anticipate payroll will remain at a similar level to last year….We’re operating the club as we have for the last five or six years,” Padres chairman John Seidler told the San Diego Union-Tribune’s Kevin Acee and other reporters on Monday at the Winter Meetings.
This latest update from Seidler himself essentially restates the approach that Acee reported as the Padres’ direction back in November, when the Seidler family announced they were exploring a potential sale of the team. That doesn’t mean the Padres won’t still be looking to shed or re-allocate some payroll space, as evidenced by reports that the club is open to moving Nick Pivetta or Jake Cronenworth.
Cot’s projects that the Padres have about $196.2MM allotted to its 2026 payroll, with a $233.2MM luxury tax number. RosterResource’s calculations are a bit higher on both fronts, with a $201.3MM payroll and a $234.5MM tax number. That leaves A.J. Preller’s front office with only a little bit of payroll room before hitting the 2025 figure, and a similarly low level of breathing room to keep San Diego under the $244MM tax threshold. The Padres got under the tax line in 2024 to reset themselves to first-timer status, so they’ll pay a reduced penalty for crossing the secondary threshold again in 2025. Presumably ownership would be okay with another tax bill in 2026 as a cost to keeping the team in contention.
Dylan Cease has already left in free agency to sign with the Blue Jays, and Michael King, Robert Suarez, and Luis Arraez are the most prominent of San Diego’s other free agents. Yu Darvish will also miss the 2026 season in the aftermath of an internal brace procedure, so starting pitching is therefore clearly the biggest need for the team. A seemingly counter-productive move like a Pivetta trade would therefore be geared towards getting some salary off the books, perhaps adding multiple arms back in the return, and maybe getting out from under the uncertainty of Pivetta’s player opt-out following the 2026 campaign.
Intriguingly, Acee also hears from a pair of sources that Preller is working on at least one blockbuster-type deal. No specific players were named as being involved, and Acee notes that it isn’t certain if these talks will lead to a trade any time soon, or if the talks are anything more than speculative. Preller is no stranger to swinging huge trades, so it isn’t surprising that the president of baseball operations is again exploring a headline-making move as he looks to make the final touches necessary to finally get San Diego back to the World Series.
Preller also said Monday that some flexibility could be built into the Padres’ spending, once the team has a better idea of what kind of moves — big or small — could be realistic.
“We’ll have an idea about where we’re at from a payroll number and then see what’s out there in terms of conversation coming out of this week. And then that could be a higher number [or a] lower number. I think it really just depends a little bit on the conversations about who’s out there and what we think we can do,” Preller said.

Looks like it leaves roughly $30 mil to work with. Don’t remember what Cronenworth is slated to make in 2026 but think Pivetta jumps up to just under $20 mil for 2026. Pretty sure Preller believes he can sell high/flip Pivetta and (by today’s standards) his relatively affordable contract to a team such as NYM, NYY, ATL, TOR, PHI, CHI, BAL or LAA. Wonder if BOS would be interested in a reunion?
12m or so for Crone I believe. If you are looking at Pivetta era it’s fake from extreme good luck. Opt outs make taking him on risky or tricky. Lots of free agents and trade targets. Boston fans would love it because of the era but he isn’t much better or better than Gray Oviedo. I think if Boston does anything it will be for the #2 behind Crochet.
I feel that your “luck” comment is valid.
Pivetta’s xERA was 3.96. Slightly below his career 4.16. His hard contact % was 45%, which was his 2nd highest in a season for his career. His K% has dropped in 3 consecutive seasons. His batting average on balls in play was .236, well below the .284 career mark. His FIP was 3.49, and xFIP was 3.85. So maybe the outfield defense of Merrill and Tatis played a factor too.
About 12m
They’ve got some money to work with, more if they get rid of those two, but then will need to replace them as well.
Work to do. SD fans, what works?
I really don’t know. Acee’s latest comments about something big, even bigger than trading Soto in 24’ has a lot of Padres fans fearing AJ trading Tatis. Though nothing from the team to support that. So others think it could be a series of trades rather than one big one. Most padres fans draw the line at trading either Tatis or Merrill.
So anyone in the minors or the Pen perhaps except Miller (though maybe him too) could be dealt. If Tatis and Merrill are off the table. Unlikely they can move manny or Xander.
Does sound like most of the work will be done via trades. Though they have about 25-30m they can spend as well.
Yeah to me it sounds like shed a little more by trade, add a bit through that, then have more money to fill in.
Tatis would net some very good returns, mostly on the prospect side one would gather or young MLBers, but definitely many teams that would like a Pivetta or Croenworth too.
Tatis seems unlikely. Preller has history of acquiring prospects (trade and draft) just for the purpose of acquiring a player like Tatis (insert or Merrill). I think Salas may be dangled with Fermin having been acquired and having 4 years.
A Pivetta trade should be secondary after acquiring some TOR talent from a Salas trade. Cut payroll and acquire maybe 2 mid ceiling guys for Pivetta. Musgrove, a TOR in the Salas trade, a 3 and 4 from Pivetta trade and Vazquez would be a fair rotation.
Add a Nick Martinez / Dustin May signing and rotation with the back fillers SD already has and rotation should be on.
Hoping Eguy is good to go as that extra piece this year.
Long- I don’t see Salas returning a TOR at this point. He needs to play a healthy season and hit to have any value like that. Kruz likey has more appeal than Salas at this point. Plus what TOR is even available. Ryan/lopez seems unlikely to be traded. One of the Marlins guys but they would likely want someone they can plug in right away.
Pivetta for two 3-4 guys doesn’t sound realistic to me. Don’t see teams trading a 3-4 guys for one year of a number 2 guy. Perhaps for two guys that can become a 3-4. Very hard to see Pivetta going anywhere. If he is traded I see him going for a cost controlled player. That would free up another 19m to spend in free agency.
I think it’s more likely a reliever is dealt. Plus perhaps one of Laureano or Sheets. I could see a deal with one of them being traded to the royals for pitching.
Also keep in mind it sounds like the padres have 20-30m available to spend in free agency.
2026 seems big for Salas. I’m hearing good reviews about his physical maturing/strengthening and think the Pads should wait and see how he progresses (if healthy) in 2026. If he does then his trade value rises dramatically, or they have a much-needed catcher for the big league team. He’s already a 70 defensively. Is he 20 yet?
Agree that Salas trade would need more pieces. Also agree that it would be upside guys – what I meant by “ceiling”.
Maybe they get Yu to retire into a “special assistant” role and have his 15 mil available too!
Marlins, Seattle and KC likley have an arm or two (could even be “mlb ready” guy and not just current rotation).
Yes, a RP sweetener or one of the young SP prospects if likely – I was just setting up the primary piece of Salas being moved.
Brew I agree with you. I just know AJ might not!
6/1/2026.
If I’m AJ, I’m 100% looking at packages for Tatis, Cronenworth, and Pivetta.
Could see something with Boston for Duran, Early, Casas, and an upper level minor league starter, +, or with the Yankees for Rice, Dominguez, Schlittler, Schmidt, +.
Pads payroll would come down almost 30m for this year, which, if you believe the article, would mean they’d have about 50-60m total to spend this offseason..
From there, AJ could round out the staff, and get another power bat or two.
Yeah, there’s also the chance, though small IMO, that Salas’ value doesn’t climb this point forward.
Everyone will have argument as to his status due to injury and suspension (both of which seem to be in the past) but, I think Tatis still is one of the best in the game that doesn’t also pitch every 5-6 days, even with an upward trajectory still for years to come.
It’s hard to wrap my head around what that trade would look like or what the fan base would feel about it or a prospective buyer.
While I’d love Tatis for the Yanks, that’s too much MLB talent to let go. A couple of those plus a couple of high minor league prospects would be better. Depending on who the Yanks are engaged with free agent wise, I’d be good with parting with any of those except Schlitter. I feel like with his makeup on the mound, in NY no less, that is exactly the type of prospect the Yanks have to keep.
I think if reports are valid and health is no longer an issue that we should see a nice 2026 for Ethan. A call up in September even at a young 21. Likely on track to compete in ST 2027 for starting / split with Fermin.
Today, he is lower than last year for sure on trade value. Still pretty high, I’d expect though but not as high as 26 trade deadline.
Does Machado or Tatis have no trade clauses in their contracts? Seems to me it might be easier to trade one of them.
Both have a full no-trade clause. They need their permission
They both do along with Xander and a partial no trade for cronenworth.
196 to 223 cots. It’s around 25-30m to spend but as Preller said there is some flexibility where it could be more or less pending the deals.
A 1B and #4 starter eat up pretty much all of $30MM. Preller will have to work up some magic again.
A guy like Kelly would be fine 15/17m short term deal. Split the difference call it 16m
Trade Adam for Casas, saves 6.5m. Leaves around 20m left. Sign King at 20m per and call it a day.
Just one of many possibilities.
I can live with Pivetta/king/musgrove/kelly/vasquez
Pen would still be pretty stacked. Perhaps Adam isn’t enough for Casas but they could throw in a minor leaguer if needed.
Casas isnt enough for Adam!
“Two sources familiar with the Padres’ discussions said Preller is shooting big.
One source said the Padres are working multiple fronts that could result in deals that rival the massive trade in which they acquired four major leaguers in exchange for Juan Soto and Trent Grisham at the winter meetings two years ago. Another source said Preller’s plans coming to fruition would make the deals he made at the past two trade deadlines pale in comparison.”
Full comments from Acee
The mlbtr article didn’t fully say what Acee says. They cherry picks part of acee’s comments.
Though all this still more speculation than anything. Of course preller does have a reputation of doing something big. His 24/7 nonstop work ethic seems to come up with something. One thing about him is it usually comes in flurries. One move lined up to support another.
I am looking forward to it. It has to be Tatis. It would make my day.
I don’t think it will be Tatis. Though you never know. The big issue with trading Tatis is losing fan support. The only thing propping up revenue is attendance. Pretty hard to believe the Padres would risk trading Tatis.
I think it would more likely be multiple trades. Some people with minor leaguers, not a ton of them left but there are still a few that teams would covet.
Second one could be moving a reliever or two.
Third option Pivetta/cronenworh smoke. Much more difficult to see either of them moved given the Padres need starters and have nobody to backfill trading cronenworth.
4th I could even see a deal with them trading Laureano. Perhaps they are okay with playing sheets in LF which he did a good amount last year. A team like the Royals would surely have interest in him or even Sheets. Laureano is under a great deal at 6.5m, sheets at about 4m via arb projection. Padres have stated they see Sheets more of a LF/DH rather than a 1b. Royals have some starters that could make sense for both sides.
Volume trades more so than trading a star.
But only one of those names is even remotely close to Soto.
Hence volume. None of them are Soto.
Simm-I don’t know man..there were a whole lot of people who got turned off by the way he moped for 3 months after tinkering with his leg kick.
Add that to everything else that comes with him, and I’d welcome a trade for the right package.
Thank you for opening my mind on that, Simms.
To be Soto+ they’d need to trade for Skubal. Bahhh
Remember, Acee is a bit of an attention seeker.
Ron- yes there certainly is truth to that. Though complaining about him vs wanting him gone are two different things.
People complain because they know there is more in him than he delivered. He is still the mega star in San Diego vs even manny.
@Simm We all could probably come up with a #5, #6, etc.. Dealing a RP of prominence seems most likely.
Hope they don’t do something silly, but it does seem in reading the tea leaves that this offseason might be more entertaining than the last. Nice to be un-hostaged from the Roki debacle.
Brew- he does reference the padres trading Soto not trading for Soto.
Definitely a different level of deals.
Yea it’s Acee though not impossible to believe when it comes to Preller and his constant such to go big.
What will Preller do is the most entertaining part of the winter meetings and trade deadlines.
Rest easy, Padres fans…
sandiegouniontribune.com/2025/11/12/padres-say-fer…
Thanks, I think some needed to be reminded
Ha ha. Too funny. So I can believe Acee on this one ?
When it’s a direct quote from FO also heard by the public on radio and TV, sure. It’s Acee’s wild conjecturing that a mature adult should be skeptical of.
I see. Ok. Thanks for the clarification.
A mature adult that runs 16yo schoolgirl internet campaigns against MLBTR writers ?
A mature adult that is constantly distorting the written word to save his ego ?
Here I was thinking it was a case of “write something I agree with….. excellent writing, write something that is uncomfortable to read…..most incompetent journalist in the world”
Sorry.My bad.
A long peaceful nappy nap
Growing up in the 60s, I would go to the Ball games to see the SAME players year after year. Not having to worry about who is getting traded for money value NOT performance.
Fast forward to now – Players with awesome skills, winning awards, after awards with the intentions of NOT of the awards they won, BUT to win a World Series. If Tatis, Merrill -Machado are continuing to be mentioned in trade rumors, and any of the 3 do end up elsewhere, I’m going to give up ever watching or keeping up with any MLB team. Baseball is supposed to be a support where the excitement of watching the players excel and bring home that eluded World Series . Baseball has to stop all these Dumb Money first trades, Make the goal of KEEPING teams together so that if they didn’t perform well enough to get in the Play Offs or better yet World Series, the fire for the next year is lit for that team to win is still lit and they play much harder. When a player gets to play with the same players year after year they get better.
I agree with those times are gone. BUT remember as a kid, we were always encouraged to have a “Dream” because “Dreams” do come true! Now, with that being said. I have been holding onto this dream for a very long time (longer than 50 yrs. when I became in love with MLB) and I’m going to come to the reality “Dreams’ also don’t always come true.
Money ball SUCKS, it only benefits the owners. and I’m going to leave it at that.
“Naturally” has to START the sentence, not come in the middle between commas.