The Padres announced Thursday that the Seidler family, which has owned the majority stake in the franchise since 2012, will explore “strategic options” for the team, including a potential sale of the franchise. Kevin Acee of the San Diego Union-Tribune reported the potential sale just minutes before the team’s formal press release.
“The family has decided to begin a process of evaluating our future with the Padres, including a potential sale of the franchise,” chairman John Seidler said within this morning’s announcement. “We will undertake this process with integrity and professionalism in a way that honors [late chairman Peter Seidler’s] legacy and love for the Padres and lays the foundation for the franchise’s long-term success. During the process and as we prepare for the 2026 season, the Padres will continue to focus on its players, employees, fans, and community while putting every resource into winning a World Series championship. We remain fully committed to this team, its fans, and the San Diego community.”
It’s been nearly two years to the day since the untimely passing of late Padres chairman Peter Seidler, who passed away at just 63 years of age. His brother, John, was approved as the team’s control person earlier this year.
That appointment came after a monthslong legal battle wherein Peter’s widow, Sheel Seidler, filed suit against brothers-in-law Matt and Bob Seidler, alleging that they had breached fiduciary duty and committed fraud as successors of their late brother’s trust. Sheel Seidler accused Matt and Bob of selling assets to themselves at “far” below-market prices as they attempted to consolidate control of the franchise. Matt vehemently denied the allegations in a formal statement of his own, wherein he accused Sheel of “manufacturing claims” against other trustees in an effort to secure control of the franchise herself.
To this point, Sheel’s lawsuit has yet to be litigated in full. If it reached that point, it’d presumably be a yearslong process. There’s no indication that the parties have settled the suit outside of court, either.
At this juncture, it’s not yet known whether the Seidler family will sell the majority stake or seek new minority investors. Acee reports that one minority owner, who owns a roughly 10% stake in the team, is in the process of selling his stake in the club. Whether there will be larger portions available remains to be seen and is surely in part dependent on interest. Acee’s report also indicates that the preliminary $1.8 billion valuation of the franchise includes around $300MM in debt and “more than $150 million in paybacks to owners for two cash infusions made in recent years.”
As we recently saw with the Twins, who had a reported $425MM in debt while they attempted to sell the franchise for around $1.7 billion, that level of debt can prove a major obstacle in finding a buyer. The Pohlad family ultimately opted not to sell the Twins franchise, instead bringing in two new minority stakeholders whose investments in the club (coupled with an aggressive deadline fire sale) helped to clear that debt.
While the current ownership landscape is rather tumultuous, the Padres should still be in a position to command considerable interest. Both Forbes and CNBC have reported the team to be profitable. They’ve set franchise attendance records in three straight seasons and ranked second in the National League in terms of attendance this season — thanks in part to a lack of competition in terms of major sports teams in the market — but still enjoy the benefit of receiving revenue-sharing funds due to the size of their market. In that sense, even with that notable debt and some infighting among the current owners, the Padres have many points working in their favor if the Seidler family does choose to pursue a sale of the majority stake.
Acee further reports that even as the team explores a potential sale, one source described the team’s baseball operations as “business as usual,” adding that payroll will be in the same general range as in 2025. The Padres opened the 2025 season with a payroll of nearly $210MM and tacked on a few million more over the course of the season. RosterResource currently projects a $201MM payroll, though that’s before any potential non-tenders or trades from the big league roster.
The Padres were far more free-spending under Peter Seidler’s watch than they have been since his passing. “Business as usual,” in that sense (coupled with a repeat of the 2025 payroll), seems to suggest that San Diego will need to explore creative deals to address various holes on the roster. The Padres have utilized complex contract structures (e.g. Nick Pivetta’s backloaded, opt-out-laden four-year contract) to keep payroll in what current ownership deems an acceptable range. They’ve also worked aggressively on the trade market to find low-cost options at areas of need (e.g. catcher Freddy Fermin, closer Mason Miller) — but in the process have further depleted an already thin farm system. They’ll now look to fill multiple rotation holes and perhaps add a bat without much in the way of financial flexibility.
Further cementing the notion that the status quo will be maintained, at least from a baseball operations standpoint, Acee writes that John Seidler and president A.J. Preller have been discussing a contract extension which could be finalized in the near future. Preller is entering the final season of his most recent contract extension. He’s been running baseball operations in San Diego since 2014. Readers are highly encouraged to read Acee’s piece in full, as it contains more granular details about the current financial structure of the ownership group and quotes from various anonymous sources on the possibility of a sale and the long-term outlook of the club.

Good. They are dodgers fans, anyway.
conflict of interest
Finally! This is great news! Not only are they Dodgers fans, but they are broke as f@#k! I’m gonna email my boy, Steve Ballmer, and have him clean out his ashtray and buy this team!
I’ll sweep this Aspiration stuff under the rug myself if Steve-O buys the team
Peter Seidler transformed the franchise into something exceptional. I think that transformation will survive this upcoming transition regardless of what direction it goes. San Diego is a smaller but very affluent market. The Padres will be fine.
Funny how when “Dodgers fans” ended up in the front offices of Petco Park, the Padres went on one of their best runs in franchise history.
John Fisher, the owner of the A’s, is a Giants fan, funny enough.
I wanna see Sheel do an interview to expose Peter’s brothers and how greedy they are. Sheel deserved better.
Angels fans punching the air (waiting for Arte to sell the team)
Arte needed to sell years ago
For the Love of Pete(r)! please do it!
Be careful what you wish for.
Does anyone have Joe Lacob’s cell #? After Selig screwed him out of the A’s, here is his chance to get a California team. Please.
Hopefully, new ownership will realize that a GM who’s hired six different managers in ten years and won absolutely nothing, probably isn’t the right guy steering the ship…….
Good thing you aren’t the Padres owner.
You mean the same GM that’s turned the Padres from total irrelevance into a playoff contender?
I guess Peter’s brothers weren’t all that committed after all?
The franchise is in huge trouble. Small market, bad local economy, bloated and lengthy contracts for aging veterans, constantly depleted minor league system due to roster-correcting trades….I said it the other day but this team is a few injuries away from finishing with 70 wins at some point in the next couple of years.
Preller restocks a farm faster than anyone. He’s in a tight spot again this year but I’ve seen betting against him putting a winning club together is usually a bad bet. They’ll have to pay eventually once Bogey and Machado are completely dead money but I think the Pads will manage to win 88-90 games again.
@Wagner>Cobb ok, Kevin Acee, we hear you.
LOL “Franchise in huge trouble” according to Forbes only the Dodgers and Athletics gained more value in the last year than the Padres. “Bad local economy” supported 3.5m people through the gates last year. Kind of sounds like you don’t know what you are talking about???
doomers’ gonna doom.
What part of they have “set attendance records for three consecutive years” did you not understand?
So then you’re predicting a 70-win season for the Padres in the next two years? Remember that.
They make it so hard to be fans.
They really do.
Here we go again! These last few years were like it’s been too good to be true. We are due for a good fire sale. Some in-house drama to crash the wave right out from under us. Let’s see how this plays out
On the one hand, it never felt like anyone besides Sheel was anywhere near as passionate as Peter was.
On the other hand, I know there’s plenty of worse ownership groups out there.
If they sell, it’s got to be to the right group of people. This city loves this team and Lord knows we’re starving for sustained success.
I think that’s the scary thing. The Padres have had a good run of relative success the last number of years (in large part because of Peter) but what will a new owner bring?
Another John Fisher or Bob Nutting would be an absolute disaster for the Padres and their fans.
For what it’s worth, after Peter died, I thought the family would just do a fire sale and push the team way down the payroll list, but to their credit, they’ve kept the team somewhat intact.
They may not have been perfect, but sometimes the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t.
Hope for a hedge fund owner with cash to burn who wants to enjoy living in San Diego.
I don’t know that a potential cheapskate owner is in a position anymore to outright purchase a franchise in MLB, NFL or NBA. I could see it possibly happening in the NHL but not the other three. You don’t have the ability to drop a couple billion on the team then come in with a plan to run it bare bones like Nutting or Fisher. In today’s marketplace you’d have to inherit the club to pull this off.
We know they just wants to cash out. I have many concerns. Potential ownership groups will likely want some of the long-term commitments to be moved before purchasing the team. The only ones you could really move would be Tatis and Merrill. I fear they will sell to a group that is just happy collecting that sweet sweet MLB welfare like we had before Peter.
They could still move Machado if they pay down part of the deal. He’s still very productive. Xander is more of a problem.
They’d have to paydown a good chunk of machado’s deal. His deal was backloaded and pays $40MM from 27-33.
Machado for Giancarlo Stanton straight up. Who says no?
No surprise after the fight that took place last year. The entire ownership group was never going to coexist long term.
That xander contract stings
Peter Seidler was 1 of 1. The rest of them can cruise right on out of town. Bye.
Nope. All of them.
What is the going rate for a franchise that has a billion dollars tied to a failed core four players, has never won in the entire history of the franchise, and does not have a local TV deal in place?
If you’re a good prospective and committed owner, those can be all fixed.
Only the Dodgers drew more people to the ballpark than the Padres in 2025, there is no NFL or NBA to compete with in San Diego. So put that in your calculator and tell us what the value is.
I bid $1.35 billion plus the $450 million to pay off debts.. Could someone please lend me $1.8 billion?
If the Twins had bidders with a reported price tag of $1.7 billion I don’t think the Padres would sell for a penny less than $2 billion.
Forbes puts the Padres value at $1.95B,
$2b or a little over is a good guess IMO.
Part of the problem is post-roids Tatis is not the otherworldly dominate hitter they thought he was going to be. He’s very good for sure, but he can’t carry the team the way he seemed like he could prior to the suspension.
They are also paying Cronenworth like a core bat and he’s basically a utility player who is a very OK hitter at best.
You realize he didn’t do steroids right? Or are you just trolling?
Are you positive about that?
The test shows positive
He used skin cream for a rash that had a banned ingredient in it—a pretty far cry from taking steroids from a needle on purpose.
Cronenworth had the third highest OPS on their team last year and his $$$ per WAR is comically better than Machado or Bogaerts. He’s also younger than those two with numbers getting better three seasons in a row. But don’t let any of that stop you from hating on the guy with like the 10th highest salary on the team. LOL
LOL at Tatis, yeah he just finished up a 6 WAR “down” season, he sucks. Get a grip.
Yeah the 2x platinum glove winner is a total bum.
$11M AAV (Cronenworth) is hardly core bat money (unless your Nutting), and actually a steal for elite defense from a 2-time all star who was a Silver Slugger finalist this year as well.
MLB’s favorite most dysfunctional family
I guess that’s what’s in
Mark Cuban here’s your chance sir. The league rejected his offer to purchase the Cubs in 2009 even though he offered 200 million more than Joe Ricketts bought the Cubs for. If I’m being honest though they’ll reject him this time too if he has interest again.
It’s assume the league rejected him. I wonder sometimes how he would’ve done if he had bought the Cubs. Would they have still win in 2016? Would they have added on when they needed to but all but refused to add on? Would they have be the first team in the NL to repeat as champions since the reds in ’75 and ’76? Maybe, maybe not but fun to fantasize about it. That’s also what MLB the show is for. Budgets off (not just for the Dodgers) sign everyone to 10 year 300 mil dollar contracts haha
I’m no fan of the Rcketts, but then I look at the White Sox with Jerry and then I console myself with what the Cubs have.
Pay off your debt with the ton of money you are going to make on selling the team. Should be plenty of money left over.
I’m waiting for the padres trade rumors to heat up. Still waiting from last year.
If the team is sold, I hope Padres fans get a decent ownership that cares about the team and not another John Fisher. Best of luck Padres fans, you deserve another passionate owner like Peter Seidler.
Probably for the best. Better to do it sooner than later and risk another Angelos family situation
Turns out Peter Seidler’s wife was right.
Interesting. It’s going to be interesting.
aside from Peter, the Seidler remind me of the guy that bought the most expensive golf clubs you could find but leave driver in the bag on a short par four With water on the right