Headlines

  • Braves Option Vaughn Grissom, Braden Shewmake
  • Jose Altuve To Undergo Surgery On Fractured Thumb
  • Rockies To Sign Jurickson Profar
  • Jose Altuve Leaves WBC Game After Hit By Pitch
  • Edwin Diaz Undergoes Surgery To Repair Patellar Tendon
  • Out Of Options 2023
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • Top 50 Free Agents
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2023
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Arbitration Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Nationals Sign Jayson Werth

By Zachary Links | December 5, 2010 at 3:47pm CDT

Scott Boras landed Jayson Werth a nine-figure contract with a surprise suitor this afternoon. The Nationals signed the free agent outfielder to a seven-year, $126MM deal. In case any doubt remained, this deal shows that it's a good time to be a free agent. Werth turned three productive seasons into the third biggest deal a free agent outfielder has ever signed.

Manny Ramirez ($160MM, 2000) and Alfonso Soriano ($136MM, 2006) are the only outfielders to sign bigger deals than Werth's. Interestingly, Vernon Wells and Barry Zito both signed deals worth exactly as much as the one Boras just negotiated with the Nationals.

The Phillies offered Werth, a Type A free agent, arbitration, but will not receive the Nats' first-round pick as compensation because Washington's pick is protected. Philadelphia will instead receive the Nats' second-round pick and and a compensatory sandwich-round pick.

Nationals GM Mike Rizzo appears to have a strong relationship with Boras. The two worked out deals for number one overall selections Stephen Strasburg and Bryce Harper in 2009 and 2010.

It was said earlier this week that the most serious suitors for the 31-year-old were the Phillies, Tigers, and Red Sox.  Those three teams were all in on Werth up until the end, tweets Jon Paul Morosi of FOX Sports.  While Joel Sherman of the New York Post tweets that Boston got up to four years on Werth, Alex Speier of WEEI.com hears the Sox never made a formal contract offer to the outfielder.

MLB.com's Todd Zolecki first reported that the two sides were nearing agreement.  Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports (via Twitter) confirmed the deal, Jon Heyman of SI (via Twitter) first reported the length of the contract and Tim Brown of Yahoo Sports reported the deal's terms (via Twitter). Rosenthal later tweeted the financial breakdown. Werth's $4MM signing bonus will be payable between January 2011 and January 2012, and his annual salaries are as follows: $10MM, $13MM, $16MM, $20MM, $21MM, $21MM, and $21MM.

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Transactions Washington Nationals Jayson Werth

Greinke Willing To Go Anywhere
Main
Athletics Notes: Beltre, Berkman, Matsui
View Comments (485)

Comments

  1. Andrew Sapiro

    12 years ago

    What a surprise, didn’t expect this.

    Reply
  2. rockfordone

    12 years ago

    Nice player to add Nats

    Reply
    • BravesRed

      12 years ago

      Nice player, but not at that many years.

      Reply
      • HipNip2009

        12 years ago

        Exactly. Boras found yet another sucker.

        Reply
        • timmah_55

          12 years ago

          7 years $126 million… sounds like Barry Zito’s contract. Boras like those numbers.

    • oleosmirf

      12 years ago

      might be the worst contract in the history of the league right there…

      Reply
      • monster55

        12 years ago

        Barry Zito? Ryan Howard? Vernon Wells? A-Rod? Mike Hampton?

        Reply
        • shysox

          12 years ago

          How the hell was the Ryan Howard contract bad? Same with A-Rod (as of right now) and Vernon Wells, and it isn’t worth the amount of money he’s making, but Zito is not posting an ERA at 5.

        • monster55

          12 years ago

          I was about to respond to your response with a WAR/$ breakdown for Vernon Wells and then tell you to simply ask any Jays fan anywhere what they feel about Vernon (hint: they’ll say he can’t hit and he should be a corner OF), but then I felt your second sentence was too incomprehensible to warrant a full response.

          As for Howard, I’ll be brief statistically: wOBA vs LHP .329; wOBA vs RHP 424. Can’t hit lefties at all and won’t get any better. And he is he average at best defensively. 8 more years. 25 million per in a few years for a first baseman.

          Do I really need to explain A-Rod? I’m a die-hard Yankees fan who has been defending A-Rod from his detractors within the Yankee fanbase. Just look at his contract. 30 million or something? He is an all-time great, but at this point only Pujols should be considered for that type of money.

          As for Zito, I have no idea what you are trying to say about him, so I’ll just say that the Giants left him off of the playoff roster……. and that ought to say enough about the contract right there.

        • Guest

          11 years ago

          howards is terrible…

        • oleosmirf

          12 years ago

          none of those guys signed those deals at Werth’s age(with only 3 good years under his belt) and he will never reach the numbers he had in Philly ever again. not to mention that the numbers he did put up arent even that great in the first place.

      • Guest

        11 years ago

        ryanhoward

        Reply
    • oleosmirf

      12 years ago

      might be the worst contract in the history of the league right there…

      Reply
      • whuron

        5 years ago

        lol

        Reply
    • eviola1

      12 years ago

      Nice player to cripple the Nats.

      Reply
  3. MB923

    12 years ago

    Wow, never would have thought that.

    Reply
  4. Johnny_Felix

    12 years ago

    To quote the prolific New York poets Wu-Tang…CASH RULES EVERYTHING AROUND ME

    Reply
  5. Yankeefan4life

    12 years ago

    Holy crap!

    Reply
  6. NL_East_Rivalry

    12 years ago

    7 years? Wow, they really needed to sign a big name. Guess FA’s need to take them more serious now.

    Reply
    • Pat_M

      12 years ago

      My guess is it’ll look a lot like the Holliday deal, 7 years $120M. If that’s the case looks like Boras was a great agent choice.

      Reply
      • NL_East_Rivalry

        12 years ago

        An amazing agent choice! I am glad for the National’s sake they don’t have a pitcher’s park for they could find themselves being very upset with themselves.

        Reply
      • NL_East_Rivalry

        12 years ago

        Wow, 126!?! Does that work with the inflation rate?

        Reply
        • Pat_M

          12 years ago

          Its 5% more than what Holliday got last season, and with the way contract values have been going that might be a little under the “baseball rate” of inflation. Still, I didn’t think teams thought of Werth and Holliday as being in the same strata. Holliday was 2 years younger and had a history of better, more consistent performance. I’m assuming that’s the premium the Nats had to offer him to get him to a team that isn’t an obvious contender

        • NL_East_Rivalry

          12 years ago

          They have been spurned as of late by FA’s.

        • guydavis

          12 years ago

          Can you imagine the look on Crawford’s face when he heard this news?

        • Dan Z

          12 years ago

          He is sitting back and thinking…”I had better widen the driveway, they’re going to need a fleet of brinks trucks to get my money here”.

      • jaryl612

        12 years ago

        Holliday=1.5xWerth

        Reply
        • roberty

          12 years ago

          So Holliday is worth a Werth and a half?

        • jaryl612

          12 years ago

          Yeah, +/- .05Braun

        • TartanElk

          12 years ago

          It’s more like: Holliday is werth 1.5 times more?

          See what I did there?

    • baseballz

      12 years ago

      Lets see Cliff Lee beat this deal !

      Reply
      • Guest

        11 years ago

        lost by 1 million!

        Reply
  7. WrigleyTerror37

    12 years ago

    This is awsome!!!! Go Nats!!!!:)

    The red soxs keep getting screwed 😀

    Reply
    • JerryJc1973

      12 years ago

      So do the Tigers! Dave Dombrowski needs to be FIRED!!!!

      Reply
      • bjsguess

        12 years ago

        What? This is a horrid signing. The Sox and the Tigers both should be praised for going nowhere near this deal.

        Reply
        • rsoxbob

          12 years ago

          This is a massive overpay, especially in years. Not upset at all that the Red Sox didn’t get Werth–wouldn’t want him at $18MM per year for even 5 years. Even the A-Gon thing I’m somewhat ambivalent about if the reason is that he was looking for something like $25MM per for 7-8 years. It’s hard to see any one player, even a “great” one like Gonzalez, worth that much risk. Maybe Boston will take another look at Beltre. Since Crawford is better, he’ll get even sillier money than Werth, and I wouldn’t even want Carl for 7/$126MM.

      • Motor_City_Bombshell

        12 years ago

        I wouldn’t call signing Benoit and V-Mart and losing out on Jayson Werth for seven years and $126MM getting screwed. Do YOU want him manning right field until he’s 38 with certain to decline numbers while paying him more than Matt Holliday? I sure don’t. As a Tigers fan, I’m happy this wasn’t Detroit’s deal, because it seems like this is them more often than not. This makes V-Mart’s $50 million deal look like a bargain.

        Reply
        • firealyellon

          12 years ago

          maybe, but as a WSox fan, I’m very happy not to see Werth a dozen times a year.

      • Dan Z

        12 years ago

        What planet do you live on? This was a horrible move by the Nats. He wasn’t worth half that amount.

        Reply
        • JerryJc1973

          12 years ago

          Why don’t you keep reading and see my explanation why I said that.

    • MaineSox

      12 years ago

      The only reason Werth would have been a big target for the Sox would have been if they signed A-Gonz and needed a righty outfielder. After losing out on A-Gonz I would assume they would have been more interested in Crawford anyway. Having said that it does still hurt because it is becoming Crawford or bust for the Sox.

      Reply
    • strikethree

      12 years ago

      The only team that got screwed was the Nats.

      (and maybe the Phillies because the Nat’s draft pick is protected)

      Reply
    • NewMets23

      12 years ago

      I’d hardly say the red sox got screwed.. they didn’t overpay for werth and detroit didn’t sign him so the still get that first round draft pick.

      Reply
    • Rays Fan 33

      12 years ago

      no they didnt who wants a guy that long no none was gonna match that deal and keep there job

      Reply
  8. phillies08

    12 years ago

    This is a joke….right?

    Reply
    • Natinals

      12 years ago

      HA!

      Reply
  9. John LeClair

    12 years ago

    Wow Now its even worse to be a Sox fan 🙁

    Reply
    • drabidea

      12 years ago

      Till 5 years from now when Werth’s legs and arms fall off

      Reply
      • Ian_Smell

        12 years ago

        His beard is most likely to go first.

        Reply
  10. Guest

    12 years ago

    Wow, did not expect that at all.That should appease the restless Nationals fans.

    Though I must say 7 years seems like a lot, I definitely wouldn’t want my team to commit that many years to him, though I guess we’ll wait for the dollar figures,

    Reply
    • Donskoy

      12 years ago

      That’s exactly what I was thinking. It may be a terrible signing eventually but, at the moment, it’s a big free agent signing that will hopefully attract fans to National games until the likes of Strasburg and Harper are recovered/in the majors.

      Reply
  11. eviola1

    12 years ago

    LOL. The Red Sox are gonna be terrible next year. They have no one to get now. HAHA.

    Reply
    • MB923

      12 years ago

      Crawford maybe

      Reply
      • HipNip2009

        12 years ago

        Angels or Rangers for Crawford.

        Reply
        • MB923

          12 years ago

          Why the Rangers? They already have Cruz, Hamilton, Murphy, Borbon.

          I say Angels or Red Sox.

        • Guest

          12 years ago

          you forgot detroit.

        • Guest

          12 years ago

          you forgot detroit.

      • Sixto_Lezcano

        12 years ago

        Crawford is going to want an 8-year deal at the least now. If Boston wouldn’t give A-Gon 8 years, how are they going to give Crawford that much?

        Reply
      • Sixto_Lezcano

        12 years ago

        Crawford is going to want an 8-year deal at the least now. If Boston wouldn’t give A-Gon 8 years, how are they going to give Crawford that much?

        Reply
    • flickadave

      12 years ago

      Carl Crawford, Cliff Lee, yep, no one left at all.

      Reply
      • eviola1

        12 years ago

        That’s right the Yankees won’t get at least one of those two guys if not both. STOP RATIONALIZING!

        Reply
        • flickadave

          12 years ago

          How many will the Jays get? I’m not RATIONALIZING! I’m just laughing at the idea that Lee and Crawford are nobodies. I think that you need to also remember that the AGon deal isn’t permanently dead. At least not yet.

        • eviola1

          12 years ago

          LMAO when did I say Lee and Crawford are nobodies. Don’t put words in my mouth. The odds of the Yankees not getting both of those guys are slim. Therefore, they’re out of the Red Sox’s reach. So who are they going to get? No one.

        • guydavis

          12 years ago

          ‘The odds of the Yankees not getting both of those guys are slim’. Uhhhh, que?

        • eviola1

          12 years ago

          LOL. If you can’t understand that you don’t understand English.

        • Rays Fan 33

          12 years ago

          crawford to the angels or tigers

        • Rays Fan 33

          12 years ago

          shut up your a nyy fan posing as a blue jays fan get over yourself do soemthing usedull

        • flickadave

          12 years ago

          I think you said it here… “The Red Sox are gonna be terrible next year. They have no one to get now”.

          To answer the second part… they are going to get Adrian Gonzales… Maybe you have heard of him.

          I hate to say this because, for the most part, I like Jays fans but are the Jays going to come in 4th or 5th in the AL East this year?

        • pastlives

          12 years ago

          you might have misunderstood but cliff lee and crawford aren’t going to be red sox, meaning there is nobody big the red sox will get on the FA market, not that those 2 guys are nobodies.

        • flickadave

          12 years ago

          OK, now, can you tell me what tomorrow’s lottery numbers are so I can buy my own island and get out of this cold weather?

      • MaineSox

        12 years ago

        After losing out on A-Gonz and keeping their prospects they could also revisit an Upton or Rasmus trade or look into Fielder. They could also pick up talks with Beltre again.

        Reply
    • Billy

      12 years ago

      They will still be better then the Jays

      Reply
      • EL CABALLO 626

        12 years ago

        Yeah no they’re not

        Reply
      • eviola1

        12 years ago

        LOL are they? NO

        Reply
    • Dave_Gershman

      12 years ago

      They have some prospects. Last I heard…

      The Sox traded Adrian Gonzalez to the Padres for Casey Kelly, Anthony Rizzo, and Reymond Fuentes. The Padres got the slugger!

      Reply
      • eviola1

        12 years ago

        Yep that’s what I mean. The Red Sox are in rebuilding mode.

        Reply
        • Rays Fan 33

          12 years ago

          there gonna be alot better than toronto will be didnt you trade your 2nd best starter to the brewers for a 2b prospect

    • Ferrariman

      12 years ago

      they’ll get beltre.

      Reply
      • eviola1

        12 years ago

        LOL i really hope they cave and give a boat load of money to him because it would be the worst investment ever

        Reply
        • redsox927

          12 years ago

          no it would still be a better deal than Vernon Wells.. hope you enjoy eating that 20 million per year for another few..

          you should worry a little bit about the jays.. the sox won 89 games without 3 of their best players pretty much all year… the jays had the stars all aligned for them and still finished 4th… Good luch tho

        • eviola1

          12 years ago

          Dude. Beltre has had two great years in his entire 12 year career. Wells had a way better tack record than Beltre and deserved that contract. If the Red Sox want to give him 5 years 90 million on a guy with not that great a history who over-performed in a contract year, I’m happy as a Jays fan.

        • pastlives

          12 years ago

          well in all fairness, vernon wells isn’t at all crippling the team at ALL, the 2 jays 2009 silver sluggers had bad years, their SS had a down year, they’ll be replacing their mediocre 1b/DH with a better bat, Morrow likely won’t get so unlucky again this year (see: advanced metrics), and they’ll actually have a 5th starter this year. and snider will be around all year.

          buccholz will regress, lackey and beckett are wildcards, as is matsuzaka…i’m not saying the Jays will be better, but you DO realize both teams probably won’t make the playoffs right?

        • Rays Fan 33

          12 years ago

          dont base everything on players the offseason isnt over and guys get injured during the year red sox are in it same with toronto if they can sign manny

        • flickadave

          12 years ago

          The Jays’ fluke home run mashing MVP candidate will go back to hitting 13 HRs a year, all of their pitchers will regress except some that will be wild cards, their 1b will still suck and their new 5th starter won’t be as good as they thought.

          Buch and Lester will be tied for second place in CY balloting. Lackey and Beckett will be co-CY winners. DiceK will still walk every other batter. To top it off, Derek Jeter will win ANOTHER gold glove.

          Hey, this is pretty fun! What team should we make stuff up about next?

        • pastlives

          12 years ago

          well in all fairness, vernon wells isn’t at all crippling the team at ALL, the 2 jays 2009 silver sluggers had bad years, their SS had a down year, they’ll be replacing their mediocre 1b/DH with a better bat, Morrow likely won’t get so unlucky again this year (see: advanced metrics), and they’ll actually have a 5th starter this year. and snider will be around all year.

          buccholz will regress, lackey and beckett are wildcards, as is matsuzaka…i’m not saying the Jays will be better, but you DO realize both teams probably won’t make the playoffs right?

        • redsox927

          12 years ago

          no it would still be a better deal than Vernon Wells.. hope you enjoy eating that 20 million per year for another few..

          you should worry a little bit about the jays.. the sox won 89 games without 3 of their best players pretty much all year… the jays had the stars all aligned for them and still finished 4th… Good luch tho

        • MaineSox

          12 years ago

          Not as bad as the Werth signing apparently…

    • redsoxfan4157

      12 years ago

      we’re getting pedroia, youkilis, ellsbury, cameron, buchholz back from injury and crawford and lee is still on the market. blue jays will be the ones winning 80 games next year

      Reply
      • eviola1

        12 years ago

        also losing Martinez and Beltre and the Yankees could easily get both Lee and Crawford.. wups .. the Jays will be hopping over the Red Sox next year.

        Reply
        • Bob

          12 years ago

          I hate to break it to you, but the Jays won’t be contenders next year. Sox and Yankees are taking over the AL East again. I could see the Jays becoming contenders in about 4-5 years, though.

        • eviola1

          12 years ago

          The Jays were only 3 games behind the Red Sox in a rebuilding year, even with the Red Sox injuries, that says a lot. Where do you get off seeing the Red Sox on the upswing for next season? Like, honestly, who do they have? Red Sox just lost their two best hitters and have not picked up anyone to replace them. Further, that list of players they can acquire is growing thin and the Yankees haven’t even dipped in yet. Are you saying the Red Sox are gonna make a push with a bunch of guys returning of injuries.

          “The Red Sox are going to take over the AL East.” LMAO. Sorry to break it to you, that’s hilarious.

        • Bob

          12 years ago

          The Sox just got AGonz for real, and the Jays just traded Marcum, their best pitcher. They’re giving up all chances of contending next year. The Jays are still working on things. They do have a lot of potential though, so I think that they will be a serious threat in about 4 years.
          And yes, I do think the Sox will be better than the Jays next year. You’re starting to sound very ignorant, when the Jays clearly aren’t ready to overcome the Yankees or the Red Sox. Oh, and when I said they are going to take over the East, I meant that they will be the only serious contenders for now.

        • eviola1

          12 years ago

          Great for the Red Sox. But the Jays obviously got Lawrie to trade for Greinke. You’ll see that unfold this week. FYI: The Jays are not trying to rebuild for the future, AA is always trying to improve the team for next season So stop talking about them like they’re the Cleveland Indians when you have no idea.

        • flickadave

          12 years ago

          Come now. We all know the Jays will be lucky to stay ahead of the Showalter led O’s.

        • Bob

          12 years ago

          If they get Grienke, they will be a lot better, but they still won’t be better than the Yankees, or Sox. Remember, Grienke is one pitcher, who pitches every 5 days. And AA is improving for the next season. Improving is the key word. The Jays are getting better, but no matter what he does, they won’t beat the Red Sox, or the Yankees next season.

        • Steve_in_MA

          12 years ago

          Both the Jays and Orioles will seriously contend in 2011.

    • Joseph

      12 years ago

      The sox will still get A Gon in the end they’ll just trade for him and work an extension later after they swap a prospect or two in the deal with San Deigo…The sox want him and Pads realize they need to restock their system and this is their best chance to do so.

      Reply
  12. Ethanator99

    12 years ago

    HOLY CRAP. geeze man I didn’t see this coming

    Reply
  13. Brad

    12 years ago

    Good on ya, Nats!

    Reply
  14. Dwan

    12 years ago

    7 years? the amount won’t be pretty.

    Reply
  15. EL CABALLO 626

    12 years ago

    It will be interesting to see what happens with the Crawford situation, Crawford is in for a huge payday

    Reply
  16. Joshua Blackstone

    12 years ago

    Wow, Nats give Werth 7 years and the Sox couldn’t swallow 8 years to get it done for AGon… wow…

    Reply
    • John LeClair

      12 years ago

      I Guess this means the Sox should just give A Gon 15 Years?

      Reply
      • BlueSkyLA

        12 years ago

        Or sign over the ownership of the team to him in 20.

        Reply
  17. BoomDizzle

    12 years ago

    Great Move…what a great day it is watching the Red Sox go down! 7 years is too much, but it is worth it to watch the Sox fans cry.

    Reply
    • Rays Fan 33

      12 years ago

      who cries over baseball really you must have no life at all you arent on a team nor will ever be get a wife and kids get a good job worry about yourself cuz in the end your just another nobody you will never make the money ortiz drew matsuzaka beckett make and i bet there wives will be hotter than you.what a lazy dude you are all you can do is talk

      Reply
  18. CitizenSnips

    12 years ago

    What is this I don’t even

    Reply
  19. Andy

    12 years ago

    That one came out of right field. I would love to see the Nats compete for a playoff spot this year.

    Reply
    • guydavis

      12 years ago

      I appreciate your glass half full mentality but wake up and smell the sh*t dude, this is one WAY overpriced signing and his bat wont even make up for losing Dunn’s. Nats could have resigned Dunn and gone out and gotten Pavano or something, but I’d imagine they’re pretty much tied up now and this is the only major signing we’ll see them make. Good luck with season and all, but they’ve still got a ways to go.

      Reply
  20. SpaldingBalls

    12 years ago

    7 Years is ridiculous unless extremely front loaded. Do you really want an Alfonso Soriano #2?

    Reply
    • WrigleyTerror37

      12 years ago

      Im just glad the Cubs didnt make the SORE-KNEEano 2!!!

      Reply
      • SpaldingBalls

        12 years ago

        He actually had a good year last year, just will never be worth his salary over his next 4 years, which will be the same thing for Werth.

        Reply
        • shysox

          12 years ago

          I agree, a .258 average, .322 OBP, and 123 strikeouts, while playing horrible defense, in 496 at bats, is absolutely stellar for a 35 year old guy getting paid 20 million an year. Nice move on Hendry’s part, huh?

        • SpaldingBalls

          12 years ago

          I didn’t say say he was stellar. I didn’t even say he was very good. He had a good year last year, and was probably worth a 10 million dollar salary. Obviously, not what Hendry signed him for

  21. Lars Chunks

    12 years ago

    7 years!?????? For a 31 year old!???? Nice signing…

    Reply
  22. bluejayspwn

    12 years ago

    feel bad for him cuz the nats wont be good until 2 or 3 years

    Reply
    • Brendan Montgomery

      12 years ago

      I don’t feel bad for anyone making $18 million a year.

      Reply
  23. David

    12 years ago

    reported 7 yr deal by heyman

    Reply
  24. coolstorybro222

    12 years ago

    Um. but but, they’re a last place team with no first base man

    Reply
    • BaseballLogic_Braves

      12 years ago

      So. They have money to spend. And with this signing means more guys will think they are contenders. Which means better players.

      Reply
      • strikethree

        12 years ago

        No. This means they’ll have LESS money to spend.

        If I were a FA this would only mean to me the Nats are willing to throw cash away.

        Contenders actually make the playoffs — not just sign players. When the Nats stop being a last place team, then they’ll look better to FAs.

        Either way, if the Nats are willing to overpay then it really wouldn’t matter.

        Reply
      • coolstorybro222

        12 years ago

        Yeah. I am actually shaking in my boots at Nyjer Morgan, Mike Morse, Josh Willingham, and their one good pitcher.

        Reply
        • Anointed Closer

          12 years ago

          I’m scared of Nyjer Morgan. Any given plate appearance, he has the potential to injure an opposing player. Until he gets clotheslined.

  25. Redbirds16

    12 years ago

    Not that the Nats were really front-runners for Lee, but now they’re certainly further removed.

    Big signing. The Nats need pitching though. They’re still a couple pieces removed from contention, but should be exciting in a few years. I guess this means Harper is now ticketed to be a LFer?

    Reply
  26. Joshua Blackstone

    12 years ago

    Wonder if you’ll be seeing an overloaded payday for Beltre returning to the Sox now?

    Reply
    • SpaldingBalls

      12 years ago

      They’ll try to get Crawford first, but if not, that’s very conceivable.

      Reply
  27. The_BiRDS

    12 years ago

    Wow I bet they overpaid the crap out of him too.. That was about as random as the Berkman signing haha

    Reply
  28. Muggi

    12 years ago

    If he signed for like 5/80 or something, I was gonna be pissed if the Phils didn’t match the offer…but no way at 7yrs. It’s been fun Jayson, good luck.

    Reply
  29. SpaldingBalls

    12 years ago

    Rosenthal makes a great point. What does this mean for Crawford? If the money for Werth is in the 17 Million range, Crawford should ask for 8/155.
    Especially considering Werth is 31 and Crawford is 29.

    Reply
    • coolstorybro222

      12 years ago

      but. Crawford is better

      Reply
      • SpaldingBalls

        12 years ago

        Exactly.

        Reply
      • strikethree

        12 years ago

        Matt Holliday and Crawford are better players.

        What a bad signing… I want to know what other SANE team was willing to go above 5 years for Werth.

        Reply
  30. bbxxj

    12 years ago

    Seven years? This isn’t going to end well.

    Reply
  31. Yastrzemski

    12 years ago

    Thank god. This was one Red Sox fan who did not want any part of this dude.

    Reply
  32. HipNip2009

    12 years ago

    A seven year deal for a 31 year old outfielder with a history of injuries. Let’s see how well he does as he no longer will play half his games in the Philly bandbox. Aaron Rowand hit 27 homers in Philly one year, Werth hit 36.

    Look up his stats on the road, they’re really not very impressive. Good defensive outfielder, though. But don’t expect him to be any kind of savior. Boras strikes again.

    Reply
    • coolstorybro222

      12 years ago

      They trade him in 3 years

      Reply
      • SpaldingBalls

        12 years ago

        Not when he’ll be making 18 Million over his 34-38 years.

        Reply
        • coolstorybro222

          12 years ago

          I’m calling it. I don’t care

        • Taskmaster75

          12 years ago

          If anything, he will get the Alex Rios treatment and just get waived to another team willing to pay.

  33. jasonallen_02

    12 years ago

    Wow, Boston salvaging a deal to get Gonzo almost becomes a must now.

    Reply
  34. Jay

    12 years ago

    Good luck Nats on finishing in last place for many years to come.You now mess up the whole market with this terrible contract you gave Werth.Expect 20 hr 70 RBI from Werth on a yearly basis

    Reply
    • strikethree

      12 years ago

      And then people blame the Yankees when teams like the Nats give crappy contracts to guys like Werth…

      Reply
  35. BravesRed

    12 years ago

    7/126. WOW.

    Reply
    • 55saveslives

      12 years ago

      This means Crawford will get 8 yrs 1 bazillion dollars!

      Reply
      • Reaper87

        12 years ago

        1 bazillion? If anything, this Werth deal makes Crawford worth at least 2 bazillion dollars

        Reply
  36. dickylarue

    12 years ago

    Seven Years?!!! God bless Boras. He is truly the ambassador of “quan”. Unbelievable.

    Reply
    • flickadave

      12 years ago

      I will never be able to figure out why you WOULDN’T have Boras as your agent.

      Reply
    • flickadave

      12 years ago

      I will never be able to figure out why you WOULDN’T have Boras as your agent.

      Reply
  37. loeres

    12 years ago

    Ken_Rosenthal

    Source: Werth is 7 yrs, $126M

    Reply
  38. Lars Chunks

    12 years ago

    This is actually okay news for the Red Sox because if they weren’t gonna land him then at least it was to a team besides the Tigers. Now the Sox get to keep the Tigers’ #19 pick for Vmart instead of it going to Phillies with Werth being the higher ranked type-A free agent.

    Reply
    • zmoney10

      12 years ago

      Ahh that also! I wasn’t too excited about Werth to begin with.

      Reply
    • heavyhitter

      12 years ago

      Party pooper!

      Reply
  39. Dave_Gershman

    12 years ago

    Wasn’t that Barry Zito’s contract? 7/126…

    #forshadowing

    Reply
    • firealyellon

      12 years ago

      funny my first though was Mauer’s 8 year $184M splurge…

      Reply
      • Reaper87

        12 years ago

        The big difference is that even with a subpar 2010 for Joe compared to 2009, he’s still worth the money. Zito isn’t and Werth soon won’t be either

        Reply
      • Camden P

        12 years ago

        Ummmm, how many GG/SS/MVPs does Werth have?? Now look at Mauer and all of his recognitions and he’s the best player at his position. Very different deals. Not to mention he could have made $50 million more from the Yanks or Red Sox this offseason had he not resigned with his hometown team Minnesota.

        Reply
        • firealyellon

          12 years ago

          you win! you took the bait with the most gusto!

  40. Jay

    12 years ago

    7 yrs at 126 makes the Aaron Rowland contract look good

    Reply
  41. zmoney10

    12 years ago

    This is good. I am a Sox fan and although Werth was a possible option, I didn’t like the idea of bringing him in on a big contract.

    This should also push them to hopefully renegotiate a trade/deal for AGon or maybe Fielder?

    Reply
    • eviola1

      12 years ago

      Or they’ll get no one.

      Reply
      • Rays Fan 33

        12 years ago

        they got agon leave the site dude your a nobody

        Reply
  42. Tyler Sekula

    12 years ago

    Source: Werth is 7 yrs, $126M #Nationals #MLB

    That’s right..who called it 😛

    Reply
  43. Steelslayer

    12 years ago

    Sox fans are riding the emotional roller coaster today…and I am loving it!

    Reply
    • Rays Fan 33

      12 years ago

      if you r life is the mlb you need a new hobby your gonna die a nobody

      Reply
  44. danks50

    12 years ago

    This is a horrible deal. Take Werth out of that bandbox in Philly with his stacked lineup and give him 7 years? Brian Sabean laughs at you.

    Reply
  45. TheodoreRoosevelt

    12 years ago

    The thing I love about deals such as this is that it makes one feel a *little* better about the Vernon Wells contract.

    Reply
  46. Dwan

    12 years ago

    126 million!!! lol

    Reply
    • coolstorybro222

      12 years ago

      He makes more than the whole team

      Reply
      • eviola1

        12 years ago

        no

        Reply
  47. vin050

    12 years ago

    Matt holliday at 7yrs > jayson werth at 7yrs

    nats should have tried to make a move last year

    Reply
  48. Shawn from New Hampshire

    12 years ago

    Hey Sox…I got an idea for you. Howbout you let your all-star catcher walk, along with not giving a possible franchise player a huge payday in AGon, resign captain old Tek, and let the status quo outfield of Nancy Drew, Jacoby Dinglebury, and has been Cameron play the field and see if you can contend in 2011. I do have to say though that Werth is not worth 7 years

    Reply
    • Steelslayer

      12 years ago

      I am absolutely gutting myself with laughter dude—your creativity and humor are totally perfect here!

      Reply
    • SneakyLongBalls

      12 years ago

      Oh, and doubting your closer because you tried to sign Riveria

      Reply
  49. Tyler Sekula

    12 years ago

    Anyone know where I can watch this press conference?

    Reply
    • BravesRed

      12 years ago

      It was on MLB Network. It will probably be on the mlb site in a bit.

      Reply
  50. Ricky

    12 years ago

    Terrible Contract

    Reply
  51. BS

    12 years ago

    Wow, this is a ridiculous contract. Crawford must be doing cartwheels. Matt Holliday must be kicking himself.

    Reply
  52. Motor_City_Bombshell

    12 years ago

    He’s getting more than Matt Holliday?? Seriously?? I’m not so sure I like this anymore.

    Reply
  53. Paul

    12 years ago

    Wow, if werth got that much how much will crawford get?!?!

    I was mad when I saw this because the tigers were rumored to be in on him, but dang not for that many years $$$ you can have him! I am glad we didnt sign him.

    Reply
  54. Jay

    12 years ago

    Werth just could say no to 7 years even though he will player for a last place team for many years

    Reply
  55. RedSox2219

    12 years ago

    He’s a little bit more valuable than Gonzo.

    Reply
    • coolstorybro222

      12 years ago

      Gonzo is more consistant and way better than Werth

      Reply
    • Reaper87

      12 years ago

      comparison fail

      Reply
  56. BoomDizzle

    12 years ago

    Ok…this deal is moronic. I know you have to overpay to get anyone to Washington but this deal will hurt their team in a couple of years. How can Rizzo justify paying Werth 18 million per year when he is 35-36 years old? Does Rizzo realize that MLB actually drug test now?

    Reply
  57. kjodon7

    12 years ago

    So Werth can get 7 years, but according to the Red Sox, Gonzalez doesn’t deserve 8…

    Reply
    • Dustroia15

      12 years ago

      I was thinking the same thing. If this deal went down earlier I think the Sox would have been forced to up their offer.

      It stinks for Washington that they are forced to pay a $1-2M a year premium per season, plus add years, just to attract free agents.

      Reply
    • MaineSox

      12 years ago

      Or… So Gonzalez can’t get 8 years, but according to the Nats, Werth deserves 7…

      I agree though, they should have pulled the trigger.

      Reply
  58. JST1331

    12 years ago

    Well this is a pretty depressing move for Phillies fans.

    Reply
    • Muggi

      12 years ago

      Not depressing IMO…i like Werth, good player and all, but he’s not worth remotely that much money or years. if that was what it required to sign him, I’m glad he’s not a Phillie any longer.

      Reply
      • JST1331

        12 years ago

        IMO I think we needed Werth and now we will have to replace him with a platoon of Francisco and Brown, hope that works out.

        Reply
        • Ryan

          12 years ago

          Dom Brown? The same guy who hit under .100 in the DR winter league, and was brought home early? Yea, I think Ross Gload is looking like the more realistic partner for Francisco at this point. Brown’s day will come, but he’s not ready for prime time yet. I’m a Phils fan, but I’m also realistic with what I saw last year.

        • Bob

          12 years ago

          yes lets judge Brown on 10 days of consistent play and 50 at bats total and then 8 days of Winter ball coming off barely playing for 2 months and a quad injury. Phillies fans amuse me.

        • Ryan

          12 years ago

          People who have never watched Brown play, but think they know him because they have his “baseball-reference.com” page bookmarked, amuse me even more.
          Thanks Bob, I needed the laugh.

        • Jessamynn

          12 years ago

          …and what you saw was exactly what Ryan said – 10 days of consistent at-bats. THATS IT. You can’t draw conclusions from that sample size – even if you’re only talking about him passing your “eye-test”, because even all-star hitters can get weird fundamentals for a week.

          Let’s wait and see how he looks in Spring Training before writing him off.

        • Brendan Daly

          12 years ago

          I’m a big Philly fan and while I agree that Dom Brown needs more consistant playing time before we really can judge him, I’m totally not sold on him being the outfield answer. His swing is too slow. WAY too slow. He can’t make mid swing adjustments because he just doesn’t have the bat speed or the wrist strength (the opposite of Chase.) This means that the BEST we can hope for from him is another pure fast ball hitting lefty. Just what the Phils need. yay.

        • Jessamynn

          12 years ago

          I actually strongly disagree with you on this, respectfully of course.

          “Slow” (as you put it) isn’t the right word – rather, his swing has a somewhat “long path” because his bat starts high, but because he holds his hands high and tight, he actually loads his hands and clears his wrists very quickly. It’s one of his best attributes actually – he had a few hits this year during his call-up that were inside fastballs that he let travel but was still able to pull the bat-head in and generate power; for me, it was pretty impressive.

          He’s definitely got a hole in his swing for off-speed stuff away, but he’s definitely got the bat speed to hit good fastballs at this level.

  59. grownice

    12 years ago

    V Wells Look’s like a steal for the jays with this contract to werth lol

    Reply
  60. mattinglyfan

    12 years ago

    Wow this really came out of right field…

    Reply
  61. Hoosierdaddy92

    12 years ago

    This is Alfonso Soriano-worthy. As a Tigers fan, I was bummed we missed out. Now, I am glad. Now we can focus on trading for Rasmus or Upton or worse comes to worse resigning Magglio. The BEST thing about this signing is while teams are going to come crawling to Magglio to sign in desperation offering ALL kinds of money, theres a good chance he signs with the Tigers for less because he LIKES playing for Detroit, shutting up some of the jerks always saying how terrible it is to play in Detroit

    Reply
  62. Dustroia15

    12 years ago

    Woah, $18M per over 7 years at 31!

    Now I can see why AGonz and Red Sox were so far apart. If Werth can get that deal, AGonz could get 7/$161 to 8/$184. Sox were probably at 6/$126

    Reply
  63. yankees_and_89_more

    12 years ago

    i guess the political commercials are right…washington loves spending only to get worse

    Reply
  64. jarg8

    12 years ago

    So he’ll be making about 18 mil when hes 39, that may be a problem for them down the road

    Reply
  65. Jay

    12 years ago

    No player in baseball deserves 8 years so if a stupid team like the Nats give a guy like Werth 7 yrs let it be

    Reply
    • vin050

      12 years ago

      Pujols might have earned it

      Reply
      • icedrake523

        12 years ago

        Pujols has already earned it. He’s the best hitter in the game and easily in the top 10 right-handed hitters of all-time.

        Reply
      • icedrake523

        12 years ago

        Pujols has already earned it. He’s the best hitter in the game and easily in the top 10 right-handed hitters of all-time.

        Reply
  66. Yankeeboy11

    12 years ago

    More money then Holliday? Crawford has to get a 8+ year deal since he’s 2 years younger lol

    Reply
  67. Tyler Sekula

    12 years ago

    Buster_ESPN Buster Olney
    Werth terms of seven years is enormous for Carl Crawford, who figures to get even more. Wonder if this will change boston’s view (more)

    hmmm. My guess is the red sox will be going REALLY HARD after Crawford..I have a feeling they are realizing now that the Werth (probably their backup plan) is gone and they will need to just give Gonzo his money and then go hard after Crawford. Just my guess. If not Gonzo then Beltre will be back with the Red Sox in 2011 which despite his awesome numbers in 2010…I don’t want that to happen.

    Reply
    • SneakyLongBalls

      12 years ago

      Theo probably wants a mulligan and would now sign Bay at 4 year 66.
      No doubt about it

      Reply
      • Tyler Sekula

        12 years ago

        For sure..seems like a complete bargain now..but then again…look how Jay Bay did last year…not so hot.

        Reply
      • nictonjr

        12 years ago

        Maybe the 4/50 Martinez deal. Doubt he will think about Jason Bay at all…

        Reply
  68. Guest

    12 years ago

    Yo, that’s some major wow! All things considered, this signing makes a lot of sense for everyone. Good for the Nat’s. I reserve making any further comment on the Red Sox and missing this opportunity and Gonzalez until the deal is officially ruled dead.

    Reply
    • eviola1

      12 years ago

      I think it made a lot of sense to Werth. That’s about it.

      Reply
      • Stephen McGregor

        12 years ago

        *cents to Werth

        Reply
  69. Joseph

    12 years ago

    This has to hurt to be a Nationals fan…126 million over 7 years for a player who nobody can honestly say is a franchise type guy. We know they have to overpay because they’re the nationals but this is obsurd.

    Reply
    • Guest

      12 years ago

      They are working to make that team relevant and you know what, Rizzo is doing a fantastic job. There is buzz there and shoot, even from NYC I find this team interesting. I’d like to see them dump Morgan, but outside of that its a fun team to hear about, kind of like the Orioles always have been for me, especially with Sholwalter at the helm. While this contract is high in dollars, they are getting a quality player, at the right price. I think they should have stopped at 5 or 6 years, max, but its manageable. These teams make money down there. They have a large fanbase and it is as much a baseball town as Boston and New York.

      Reply
      • strikethree

        12 years ago

        I disagree.

        I think your desire in rooting for the underdog is getting in the way of your analysis.

        I admit I don’t have the actual financial statements of the team but neither do you. However, here are some facts:

        The Nats came in 23rd in baseball attendance for 2010. 23rd. They also don’t have the same TV deals as other teams. For comparison, the Tampa Bay Rays came in 22nd. The Nats do not have the same fanbase numbers as Boston or New York — and it really isn’t close.

        Instead of signing Werth, they could have used the money and upgraded their facilities, medical staff, minor league training (like coaches), scouting or used the money for International relations. (there are a lot of great CHEAP players outside of America) Baseball fans only think about free agents and draft picks but there is a lot more a team can do to improve the organization and winning chances.

        Could they afford it? Yes. However, the point is to maximize a budget. This signing is not a smart move and does not maximize the “bang for the buck”.

        Reply
        • flickadave

          12 years ago

          The owner of the Nats, Ted Lerner, is 85 and worth $3 Billion. Maybe he just wants to see his team win a few games and figures he can’t take it with him so he might as well have some fun.

          The Nats just opened a new $600 million stadium so I think they are all set there. Maybe the Nats are just tired of free agents saying no.

        • strikethree

          12 years ago

          Then what about letting Adam Dunn go? What about signing Crawford instead? If offered the same deal, would Crawford really reject it? Did they try Lee?

          Money can go to their minor league facilities (both in America and baseball facilities abroad) is what I meant.

          This signing just really seems irresponsible. It’s a perfect example of moral hazard where it’s not the General Manager’s money so why not up the risk? The Red Sox had an offer of 4 years. Was going an extra 3 years really necessary just for Werth to say yes? I guess Rizzo doesn’t want to have more losing seasons on his resume so why not throw cash away? It’s not his and he’ll lose his job anyway if they keep losing.

          Either that or he is way too friendly with Boras.

        • flickadave

          12 years ago

          Putting money into minor league facilities and signing more minor leaguers isn’t going to put people in the seats or get them to tune in to the TV to watch this year. The Nats desperately needed a marquee type player to hype and, in their minds, they got one. It could be that Crawford and Lee told the Nats that they value winning as much as $$$ and the Nats had no shot at them no matter what the contract.

          With a contract this size I have a feeling ownership gave it their blessing. I doubt Rizzo has a blank checkbook.

        • strikethree

          12 years ago

          Well of course they think it was worth it. However, spending cash in player development and scouting increases your chances of winning. It’s not like the cash can’t be used on other FA’s either. A high risk/reward type player like Webb comes to mind. The Nats need to start winning more than they need Werth and his enormous contract. You increase your probability of winning more in spending on alternative options than just splurging your resources on one deal. The Nats isn’t like the Red Sox or the Yankees — the Nats have a ton of other holes to fill.Would Werth really garner more seats than Dunn did? They already have a marquee type player in Strasburg and Harper has huge potential as well. Again, I know what they were thinking; I simply think they’re choosing the wrong path. It’s very disappointing to see a team with so much promise shoot itself in the leg with a signing like this. It happened with the Cubs, Tigers, Astros, etc. You start thinking that signings like these will be manageable and then you spend years in mediocre limbo all because of payroll inflexibility.

        • flickadave

          12 years ago

          I must have missed something. I haven’t read lately that the Nationals have a glaring deficiency in either the scouting or the player development areas. As a matter of fact, the Nats have also been spending huge money to sign the players that they have been drafting.

          I agree that you increase your chances of winning by spending in numerous areas and one of those areas is free agency. The Nats offered more than the Yankees did for Teixeira and yet he signed with the Yankees. They have talked to, it seems like, every big name free agent that comes along with no luck in signing them. Finally, they convinced one to sign by offering way more than anyone else. Will this break them financially? No. Will this even handicap them financially? I doubt it. Keep in mind that the owner of the Nationals has a net worth that is DOUBLE what the Steinbrenners are worth.

          As for putting people in the seats… I’m betting Jason Werth/ Carlos Pena puts more fans in the stands than Adam Dunn. Let’s see how the rest of the off season plays out. Games don’t start for a few months and the Nats have plenty of time to work more deals. Try not to fret over how much the money will handicap the Nats. No one really knows how much payroll they can take on except the owner and maybe the GM.

        • strikethree

          12 years ago

          “I haven’t read lately that the Nationals have a glaring deficiency in either the scouting or the player development areas.”

          Well, they signed Werth didn’t they? Scouting can’t be that great.

          At any rate, a team can always improve their baseball departments. (Deficient or not)

          I hope you’re right; maybe the guy really wants the Nats to win. However, no matter how rich you are, you never want to get stuck with a losing business. Of course they have cash now, that’s because most of their good players haven’t had enough service time yet. Before the Werth signing, the highest paid guy on payroll was Ryan Zimmerman’s 8.9 mil for 2011. Wait till they need to resign guys like Zimmerman to keep them on the Nats.

          We’ll see how the rest of the offseason plays out but really shouldn’t make deals like this again.

      • InLeylandWeTrust

        12 years ago

        What woud you be saying if Boston signed him to this deal….

        Reply
  70. Ferrariman

    12 years ago

    why not just sign superior player in holliday last offseason. this team just got fleeced.

    Reply
  71. $3866193

    12 years ago

    Scott Boras is a masterful pitchman. He’s the Billy Mays of baseball.

    Reply
    • Tyler Sekula

      12 years ago

      “I’VE GOT AN AWHHH-MAZING PRODUCT FOR YOU TODAY!! JAYSON WERTH!! A 31 YEAR OLD BEARDED OF FORMALLY OF THE PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES!!! HE CAN BE YOURS FOR A MEAR 18 MILLION A YEAR!!!!”

      May Billy Mays soul continue to sell godly items to all the angels in heaven. R.I.P.

      Reply
    • Taskmaster75

      12 years ago

      He’s pretty much Billy Mays without the drugs and tons more money.

      Reply
    • Ryan

      12 years ago

      Isn’t it ironic that Billy Mays made his living selling white powder, and ultimately this is what also killed him.

      Reply
  72. Jay

    12 years ago

    I wish teams would stop spending crazy money on players like Werth.The Rays are the smart ones in this sport

    Reply
    • Jessamynn

      12 years ago

      How are the Rays the smart ones (in this regard)? Their payroll is low because all of their players are on entry level contracts – and the only reason they have so many high-talent players on those entry level contracts is because they were awful for literally 10 years, allowing them to draft high every year.

      If being bad for a decade straight in order to stockpile picks — so that you don’t have to pay for guys past their arb year — is the “smart” approach..

      Don’t get me wrong, I think the Rays have a smart Front Office, but c’mon.

      Reply
  73. Jacob

    12 years ago

    good for the nationals finnaly becoming something besides the luaghing stock of baseball not many teams could offer a deal like that to a free agent of that caliber what it also means is that their really gonna try to stick it to the phillies i very much aprove of this acquisition nationals i believe aernt done yet im sure theyll do something else to try and make us believers they do seem to be going in the right direction with strasburg and harper and now werth add his name to guys of ivan rodriguez, nyjer morgan, and ryan zimmerman why not make this a team to watch?

    Reply
    • eviola1

      12 years ago

      Yeah actually, this is a deal that is going to make them the laughing stock of baseball. Before this they were building from within and making rational decisions-nothing funny about that. This is funny, though.

      Reply
  74. Mac

    12 years ago

    i think this is an absolutely stupid contract as far as years and money, but at least i’m glad to see Washington make an attempt at a good player. Maybe the Orioles will take note and actually spend some damn money on someone, it seems like were one of the only teams that always wait till everyone has signed and just pick whose best of what is left and sign them cheap!!!

    Reply
  75. Pool Messi

    12 years ago

    WOW! The salary inflation is getting worse by the minute. I blame the inflation on Jeter’s new contract!!

    Reply
  76. Ricky

    12 years ago

    This deal is absurd.

    Reply
  77. proof2006

    12 years ago

    Now I’m kind if glad the phillies didn’t sign him. That’s alot of money

    Reply
  78. mkorpal

    12 years ago

    Ha, LOL. Good luck with that dead weight when Strasburg is hitting free agency.

    So, Willingham should be traded now to the Rockies.

    Reply
    • wickedkevin

      12 years ago

      I wish people would realize that the Nationals have THE RICHEST OWNER IN BASEBALL

      Reply
      • TheodoreRoosevelt

        12 years ago

        Rogers Communications may dispute that.

        Reply
        • briantalletsmoustache

          12 years ago

          They may, but I bet they’d prefer not to.

      • Rays Fan 33

        12 years ago

        lots of owners are rich to bad they dont spend to make there team better alot of them

        Reply
  79. Max Jackson

    12 years ago

    The Nats seriously over-paid.

    $18 mil for somebody who hits around .270, ~25 homers, ~85 RBIs, and a dozen steals every year.

    I don’t get it. Must be another Boras brain-wash job.

    Reply
  80. strikethree

    12 years ago

    Dumbest move of the offseason goes to MIKE RIZZO.

    I criticized his Jason Marquis signing last year but this definitely takes the cake.

    Jayson Werth is NOT Matt Holliday or Carl Crawford. You don’t give anything more than 5 years for a guy who posted an OPS above 900 JUST ONCE while hitting in a hitter’s ballpark.

    Someone tell the guy that Werth is NOT A GAME CHANGER. He hit in a very dangerous lineup and very favorable ball park. What was Rizzo thinking?

    Reply
    • Mickeyblue

      12 years ago

      I don’t know signing Tulo to 20 million 6 yr contract when he isn’t even a FA til 2015 takes the cake but this is up there for sure.

      Reply
    • Jessamynn

      12 years ago

      In fairness to Werth, he’s only been an everyday player for 2.5 seasons – literally. So posting an OPS only “once” in 2.5 seasons isn’t as bad as you’re making it sound.

      On top of that, the RBI numbers are misleading, since he hit behind Howard (who averages 130 RBIs a year since 2006) the entire time, so obviously Werth had less chances to drive in runs.

      But yeah, I agree that he’s not an “anchor” type player that you build around.

      Reply
      • strikethree

        12 years ago

        I’m not exactly sure the lack of history helps his cause. In comparison, Matt Holliday’s average OPS is still higher than Werth’s best season — full or otherwise.

        I didn’t really argue RBI numbers but hitting in the Phillies lineup still nets you RBI opportunities. Werth’s number of ABs with RISP to Dunn’s number is similar although Dunn had more opportunities. (The difference is about 10 for 2010 and Werth actually had more AB’s with RISP for 2009) Anyway, I don’t really count RBI numbers cause they are very misleading at times.

        Reply
        • Jessamynn

          12 years ago

          You have a valid point.

          I’m not trying to overstate RBIs or anything, I was just simply responding to the fact that you described him as an “85-RBI” guy, so I assumed you were putting some stock in that. My apologies if I misunderstood.

          Regardless, I think you MIGHT be under-rating Werth a bit – he’s certainly not perfect, and not a franchise type player, but he’s very well rounded and does everything well. He’s very, very impressive defensively in person, despite what UZR says – takes great angles on ground balls heading to his sides, for example.

          Worth this contract? Absolutely not – but still a very nice player.

  81. num3fan

    12 years ago

    HAHA! Didn’t see that one coming!

    Reply
  82. Sixto_Lezcano

    12 years ago

    Do the Nats actually think Werth will be worth $18 million seven years from now, or are they trying to make a playoff push?

    Prince Fielder for Jordan Zimmermann. Make it happen, Melvin.

    Reply
    • Dwan

      12 years ago

      I’d be worried about that SLG going down leaving CBP.

      Reply
  83. Sixto_Lezcano

    12 years ago

    Do the Nats actually think Werth will be worth $18 million seven years from now, or are they trying to make a playoff push?

    Prince Fielder for Jordan Zimmermann. Make it happen, Melvin.

    Reply
  84. Camden P

    12 years ago

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Reply
  85. Camden P

    12 years ago

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Reply
  86. Motor_City_Bombshell

    12 years ago

    *Ring! Ring!*

    Crawford: Hello?
    Reagins: Hello, Carl, it’s Tony Reagins in Los Angeles.
    Crawford: Oh, hey Tony.
    Reagins: My home boy Torii and I are really interested in making you a Los Angeles Angel.
    Crawford: Wow, what an honor, I’d love to play for you guys.
    Reagins: Well, since the interest is mutual, why don’t we whip up a contract right now?
    Crawford: Okay, what did you have in mind??
    Reagins: Well, Carl, my front office and I sat down and discussed this for awhile, and we decided we were ready to give you the biggest contract in our franchise’s history for six years and $105 million, we figured that’s more than fair considering you are an amazing player and all.
    Crawford: Well that’s all fine and dandy, Tony, but I just saw my buddy Jayson Werth just got signed by Washington for seven years and $126 million. I’m a better all around player than Werth, surely I deserve more than that.
    Reagins: Obviously, Carl, we can’t give out that kind of contract, you have to understand that Werth is being drastically overpaid.

    *click* *beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep*

    Reagins: Hello? Hello???

    (A few days later…)

    *Ring! Ring!*

    Crawford: Hello?
    Reagins: Hi, Carl! Me again!
    Crawford: Ugh, what the f#!k do you want?
    Reagins: We realized that you make a fair argument, and that you are indeed a better player than Jayson Werth, so we have decided to not make this a fiasco and just offer you an eight-year $180MM contract as a way of saying we’re sorry.
    Crawford: Well, I guess that seems fair. I’ll agree to that.
    Reagins: I can see your halo, Carl.
    Crawford: We need to include a clause in my contract that clearly states you are never allowed to quote Beyonce ever again.
    Reagins: Only as long as some of your contract can be deferred.
    Crawford: It’s WERTH every penny.

    -THE END-

    Reply
    • Camden P

      12 years ago

      Lmao awesome.

      Reply
      • Motor_City_Bombshell

        12 years ago

        I try. 🙂

        Reply
    • Camden P

      12 years ago

      Lmao awesome.

      Reply
    • MEMO121989

      12 years ago

      LMFAO!

      Reply
  87. Thebroodinghawk

    12 years ago

    OMG!!! As a Phillies fan I can’t believe this horrendous contract! Werth is certainly a solid player but no where near worth this kind of cash. A seven year contract for a 31 year old outfielder with exactly TWO count em’ TWO good full years …… no last year was NOT a good year ….. he hit .186 with runners in scoring position. Wow….. Nats you are indeed run by the equivalent of Mister Magoo……

    Reply
    • Jessamynn

      12 years ago

      He’s had two good years — and he’s only been a starter for 2.5 years.

      But yeah he’s not worth this.

      Reply
  88. Nick

    12 years ago

    More like…..things have been going Boston’s way if that kind of money/years is the current FA market. I’d rather gouge my eyes out than see Werth on our squad for that deal.

    Absolutely brutal deal that jacked up the price on any and everyone decent. Stupid Nationals. And people wonder why they never win jack.

    Reply
  89. the_show

    12 years ago

    He has never had 100 rbis in a season….Rizzo is all day dumb

    Reply
    • briantalletsmoustache

      12 years ago

      There are lots of reasons why this contract is bad. Werth’s RBI totals from season to season isn’t one of them.

      Reply
  90. Michael

    12 years ago

    The Nats have questions surrounding them but with a legit number 2 sp. Im sure they probably have one in their system. If Steven comes back healthy and Werth hits (unlike my guy Aaron Rowand) and Bryce is able to come up within the next 2 years the Nats will have a contender

    Reply
  91. hardcoreforhardcore

    12 years ago

    I get that the Nats really wanted to make a big splash but WOW they are over paying. You can tell every team in on Crawford is probably so mad they gave Werth this deal.

    Reply
  92. Drew Castellano

    12 years ago

    That’s a lot of similar right-handed bats in that lineup, assuming they don’t deal willingham. Also, you keep hearing Washington in all the big name rumors. It seems like for that reason, and because of this deal they’re making an attempt to legitimize their franchise. It seems silly for them to be doing anything buy building on a young cheap prospects for the long-term.

    Reply
  93. firealyellon

    12 years ago

    Crawford just made millions. Who gets to overpay him?
    1. Angels (current favorite)
    2. NYY (one of the few teams with the funds)
    3. Texas
    4. BoSox (desperate to make a splash but possibly too poor for carl now)

    Reply
    • nictonjr

      12 years ago

      I think the Yanks were hanging around in case the market was 4/60 is for Crawford. They’re going to have to give Lee 6/~140+. No way the add 8/~180 to Crawford as well…

      Reply
      • Jon Stark

        12 years ago

        That’s what we all thought with CC, Burnett and Tex too.

        Reply
        • nictonjr

          12 years ago

          They had the payroll space available then. Unless they raise payroll to $250 mil, which is fine, they won;t be able to get both. If it stays at $210mil they’ll have trouble signing Lee and Pettite…

  94. firealyellon

    12 years ago

    Crawford just made millions. Who gets to overpay him?
    1. Angels (current favorite)
    2. NYY (one of the few teams with the funds)
    3. Texas
    4. BoSox (desperate to make a splash but possibly too poor for carl now)

    Reply
  95. flickadave

    12 years ago

    Wow. This deal is terrible. If Werth doesn’t pan out then Lerner, the owner of the Nationals, is probably going to go broke… oh, wait… nope, he will still be a multi-billionaire.

    Kind of baffling that they couldn’t sign Dunn if they have that kind of cash they are throwing around tho.

    Reply
    • Muggi

      12 years ago

      I will never understand why people think an owner’s net worth has anything to do with the team’s spending. It’s a business, not a hobby.

      Reply
      • Jeff P

        12 years ago

        not to all owners

        Reply
      • flickadave

        12 years ago

        The owner is 85 and worth $3 BILLION. I will never understand why some people think that a $126 million contract is something Lerner will lose sleep over. Yes it’s a business and the more you win—> the more bigger your fan base—> the more your franchise is worth plus you get to actually watch your team win before you croak. If I was worth $3 Billion and was 85 years old, I would probably sign Crawford and Lee, too.

        Reply
        • Jessamynn

          12 years ago

          Do you know for a fact that he’s worth $3 billion in liquid assets? Because I can certainly promise you that he’s not.

          Being worth $3 billion and having $3 billion to spend are two ENTIRELY different concepts.

        • flickadave

          12 years ago

          Liquid or illiquid, a $126m contract isnt going to bankrupt Ted Lerner. Let me ask this… how many more people are going to attend games and watch on TV let alone buy Washington Nationals “WERTH” jerseys than if they just plugged that hole with another second rate talent? How would that decrease in revenue and ratings affect the value of the franchise? This signing, in my opinion, is like paying Jeter what he is getting the next few years.

        • Jessamynn

          12 years ago

          I understand what you’re saying – in fact, the Phillies made a similar move 8 years ago when they overpaid for a 32-year-old Jim Thome on a contract that ran until age 38.

          At the time, I said pretty much the exact same thing you just did – that the move was important for a struggling franchise to get some good will from the fan base – and it was. But it’s not like the contract was still a good idea from a dollars standpoint – the Phillies had to trade him 3 years later and eat half the salary.

          Was it worth it? Probably – it showed the baseball world that the Phillies were ready to start trying to win – but I’d wager that the Phillies’ success since the Thome deal had more to do with developing Utley/Howard/Hamels/Rollins then it did with overpaying Jim Thome to play here for 2.5 seasons.

          Now, if this move turns out to be the key point that starts a run of success for Washington (like the Thome deal was for the Phillies), then I’m sure the Nats and their fans will be happy; but if it’s not, then this deal hurts.

  96. John

    12 years ago

    Dang, Werth must be smiling all the way to the bank on that one.

    Reply
  97. John

    12 years ago

    Dang, Werth must be smiling all the way to the bank on that one.

    Reply
  98. Gocubs2010

    12 years ago

    Is it mean or has this been the year of the most over-paid players to date for an off season?

    Reply
  99. pageian

    12 years ago

    Wow! Didn’t see that coming. What an overpay, in years and dollars. I suppose the Nat’s felt they needed to overpay to get a marquee player to come to them, similar to how the Tigers overpaid Magglio back when he signed with them. Still though, going 7-years on Werth seems to be at least 2 too many. And by year three or four and after he’s not likely to be worth the amount he’s going to get paid. This signing seems very similar to the Cubs signing Soriano four years ago. Paid too much, player started to decline early and isn’t as productive as was before the deal.

    Reply
    • AmericanMovieFan

      12 years ago

      I remember reading a fan graphs article looking at Soriano’s peripheral numbers, arguing how he was still technically worth $17MM per season, while only producing less than 27 HR’s per season, never playing in more than 135 games and watching his stolen base totals dwindle precipitously, along with RBI’s, etc. This is the problem with long-term deals. Werth is not in any way shape or form worth $18MM per season, let alone over the length of this contract. But whatever. Good for him. He’s gonna make over $140MM lifetime thanks to this deal.

      Reply
  100. damnitsderek

    12 years ago

    The Nationals are going to begin to experience some serious bouts of regret from this deal around 2013.

    Reply
    • Nick

      12 years ago

      But Nationals fans think they can just trade him them.

      HAHAHAHAHA

      Reply
  101. HipNip2009

    12 years ago

    What is it about that magic number, $126 million. That’s exactly the amount Boras suckered Brian Sabean into. Wow, I wonder what his cut is? Pretty soon, he ought to be rich enough to buy a damned team instead of bilking them.

    Reply
  102. dickylarue

    12 years ago

    Just waiting for the first writer to blame this awful deal on the Yankees somehow.

    Reply
  103. M.Kit

    12 years ago

    Seems small market teams always overpay like this. The deal is absolutely ridiculous. Why the Nats won’t be a winning team

    Reply
  104. safari_punch

    12 years ago

    Derek Jeter is not amused!

    Reply
  105. ryanfea

    12 years ago

    Holy Crap! SHOCK!

    Reply
  106. Vincent

    12 years ago

    so the Yankees will be paying $17 million for a 38 year old Derek Jeter and the Nationals will be paying $18 million for a 38 year old Jayson Werth?

    at least Jeter will fill the seats…

    Reply
  107. BloodySock

    12 years ago

    Wow, I think this is a massive overpay, but I’m glad he didn’t go to the Red Sox. I was never big on him. I’m curious how our local (DC area) media will play this up, especially after not ponying up for Dunn.

    The real winner in this might just Carl Crawford. Even though they’re different types of players, it might give him leverage on at least the years he’s looking for.

    Reply
  108. mrmoss

    12 years ago

    Who plays 1st base for the Nationals in 2011…Willingham?

    Reply
  109. NYBravosFan10

    12 years ago

    Holy crap what a suprise this was!! I was positive he was going to the Red Sox

    Reply
    • NYBravosFan10

      12 years ago

      YAY!!! That was my 500th comment!!!

      Reply
  110. TimE

    12 years ago

    lol @ all the RBI comments. And Werth is a good player, but this contract is one reserved for superstars, not 31 year old sluggers. He’s going to be making 18 million when he’s 39.

    Reply
  111. Craig Cutler

    12 years ago

    Didn’t see this one coming at all.

    Reply
  112. Steve

    12 years ago

    The nats are going to be filthy in a few years!

    Reply
  113. Carter S

    12 years ago

    They had to overpay, because that was the only way they were going to able to get a big FA to come to Washington. Though I am apprehensive about the length of the deal & the age of the player..I will enjoy it now and then regret it in 5 years.

    GO NATS!

    Reply
  114. Steve

    12 years ago

    Nasty

    Reply
  115. Sschweigert21

    12 years ago

    Nasty

    Reply
  116. stl_cards16

    12 years ago

    I like that the Nationals are going after some big names and trying to attract even better pieces for the future. I understand that they have to overpay to get the big free agents there right now. But 7/126 seems way high, especially this early. I would of thought that contract would of put them into Crawford territory. I guess we will see though.

    Reply
  117. patburn

    12 years ago

    Carl Crawford should be the biggest fan of this, imagine what he is going to get now on the market.

    Reply
  118. sschweigert21

    12 years ago

    theyre gonna be nasty in a few year

    Reply
    • Camden P

      12 years ago

      Nasty as in awful. They won’t make the playoffs over the course of Werth’s contract.

      Reply
  119. Kb

    12 years ago

    terrible signing. werth will be declining after year 3.

    Reply
    • Jon Stark

      12 years ago

      apparently they disagree.

      Reply
  120. sheldonman14

    12 years ago

    This is a terrible contract, but I’m happy he didn’t go to the Yankees or Red Sox. Every player they lose, my Jays have a better chance of climbing the AL East ranks.

    Reply
  121. Sschweigert21

    12 years ago

    Test

    Reply
  122. krazykrab55

    12 years ago

    This is not going to end well. Extreme overpay for a slightly overrated Werth but that is what the Nationals had to do to attract Werth to sign. I’m scared to see what Crawford will get.

    Reply
  123. myname_989

    12 years ago

    Oh. My. Goodness.

    Reply
  124. Sawksfan

    12 years ago

    Good for the Nats. I’m happy to see the excitement being generated in Washington. It’s good for baseball.

    From a Red Sox fan.

    Reply
  125. tiger313

    12 years ago

    W.T.F????? The Red Sox have been shafted so far this offseason. After this signing I believe Crawford is going to the Orioles.

    Reply
  126. okbluejays

    12 years ago

    The Sox will probably re-sign Beltre now. They aren’t getting Cliff Lee, and I don’t think they will want to pay what Crawford will be asking after what Werth got. As a Jays fan, i’m happy about it, but it doesn’t mean that the Red Sox are magically going to be a terrible team just because they missed out on Werth (and a ridiculous contract) and probably Crawford. If the Red Sox somehow miss out on Craw and Beltre, then i’d be extremely happy, probably not going to happen though. I’m sure if they did, they would be re-visiting that A-Gon deal right away.

    Reply
  127. okbluejays

    12 years ago

    I don’t think this will be as bad as the Vwells contract in the end though. I actually think Werth will continue to be pretty good throughout his contract, but time will tell.

    Reply
    • eviola1

      12 years ago

      I’d take Wells and his contract over Werth and his contract any day.

      Reply
      • okbluejays

        12 years ago

        lol please explain this one…Wells is one of the worst defensive CF’s in the league, while Werth has only had a negative UZR once, which was last year. Now lets take a look at the bat…Wells has topped a .380 wOBA twice in his career, the last time being in 2006, while Werth has eclipsed that mark 5 years in a row.

        Reply
  128. SneakyLongBalls

    12 years ago

    What a great ice breaker this will be for the GM’s at the winter meetings

    Reply
  129. The_Silver_Stacker

    12 years ago

    Come home from work and open up the interwebz to this and instantly laughed, but seriously the Nats are going to regret this day.

    Reply
  130. Tomamy

    12 years ago

    wow the phillies clearly made no attempt in resigning him so now to fill in for that right handed bat they are going to have to make a trade…wow

    Reply
    • nm344

      12 years ago

      What?

      Reply
    • Jessamynn

      12 years ago

      Thank god the Phillies didn’t match this contract, 7/126 is just insane.

      Reply
  131. BoomDizzle

    12 years ago

    Crawford will have to get at least 7 if not 8 years and probably at least 20 million per year.

    These offers are absurd…I would rather sign Derek Lee for a fraction of the money rather than sign Werth. for 7years. Heck, just resign Dunn. This is just crazy!

    Reply
  132. bonestock94

    12 years ago

    What a hilarious day. I bet Beltre and Crawford are throwing parties tonight.

    Reply
  133. AmericanMovieFan

    12 years ago

    Seems to me that every deal for 7-8 years in the $120-140MM range ends up being a failure.

    Carlos Beltran (Mets haven’t made it to the post season and his last year couple years on contract are looking to be a bust)

    Jason Giambi (No WS titles in his tenure, plus a whole bunch of lost seasons to strange ailments)

    Barry Zito (Derr)

    Mike Hampton (Still managed to be a journeyman with such a massive contract and never pitched better than league average)

    Todd Helton (Not worth that money, not by a long shot)

    Matt Holliday (Jury is out, but I still say he’s a glorified 25 HR hitter that shouldn’t be worth more than $12MM per season)

    Ryan Howard gets a pass since his deal is for 5 years and not 7-8 and he’s proven himself every year thus far (though he desperately needs a bounce back season)

    Reply
    • David Tate

      12 years ago

      I don’t think you can include Holliday in that group. He was a beast in the first year of his contract, and we have no idea how he is going to play later on. Just sayin.’

      Reply
  134. azdsnd

    12 years ago

    Wow. What a truly terrible contract. This is a guy who deserved 5/80, not 7/126. Rizzo just guaranteed himself an albatross in four years. Then again, if Strasburg and Harper don’t pan out, he won’t be around for the end of this monstrosity.

    Reply
  135. Ben_Cherington

    12 years ago

    well my heart was already ripped out today might as well be stomped on and i didnt really even want werth. I guess its just one less option that hurts..or maybe its seeing other teams spending money!

    either way…

    THIS IS BAD FOR BASEBALL! I hate seeing bad singings…its just bad for the game overall.

    Reply
  136. eviola1

    12 years ago

    Dunn got $56 million over 4 and Werth got $126 over 7? Wow, somebody messed up.

    Reply
    • mg

      12 years ago

      Was Dunn willing to come back? Probably not for 4/$56. Werth is still ghastly overpaid, but a bad comparison.

      Reply
      • eviola1

        12 years ago

        Umm, I’m not talking about the Nationals screwing up in getting Werth over Dunn. I’m saying Dunn is a very good hitter and got significantly less than Werth. THINK BEFORE U WRITE

        Reply
        • nm344

          12 years ago

          You’re comparing an iron-gloved 1st baseman against a guy who can play CF and steal bases? Quite the comparision.

  137. T206

    12 years ago

    A necessary move to replace Dunn’s power in the lineup. Good job Rizzo and ownership for making effort here. LaRoche would be a great LEFT-handed bat and first baseman to add now, and Greinke would make a succesful offseason pitching acquisition. Then you have a shot at a .500 season, and once that happens, anything can happen. Got to love baseball …..

    Reply
    • Jake Morris

      12 years ago

      Replacing Dunn’s power with Werth is an extreme degradation in power. Werth in that park and that lineup is worth 25 HR tops

      Reply
  138. 55legend

    12 years ago

    HAHAHA perfect! Werth basically is a replacement for Dunn, with a slight better avg. and fielding%. 7 years?! Phillies are now weaker, Nationals are still flat with their best pitcher injury prone. Love it. Terrible loss for the Phils, Nationals are only a tad more competent.

    Reply
    • nm344

      12 years ago

      Phils knew Werth wasn’t coming back. Not exactly a surprise.

      Reply
  139. mg

    12 years ago

    You can’t really compare Werth’s contract to Dunn’s if Dunn wasn’t willing to return to the Nats. That being said, $126 million for a power hitter who never hit 100 RBIs and had ONE season above 30 HRs? And just for kicks, Jayson is also several months older than Adam Dunn. A few months is immaterial, but the fact remains that Jayson is older.

    Reply
  140. James M

    12 years ago

    Scott Boras is going straight to Heck when he dies. Straight down to Heck.

    Reply
    • Ferrariman

      12 years ago

      i’m sure he’ll negotiate himself out of it.

      Reply
  141. InLeylandWeTrust

    12 years ago

    Boras at his best. BIGGEST BUST OF FREE AGENCY. I don’t even want Crawford now, the price will be insane, and 8 years is almost a lock now.

    Reply
  142. mg

    12 years ago

    Scott Boras is just doing his job, and doing it well. I don’t personally like the guy, but you have to respect him for not half-assing his job like 98% of Americans do.

    Reply
    • Jessamynn

      12 years ago

      Very true.

      Reply
  143. Dick Armada

    12 years ago

    Good day to be a non-Red Sox fan

    But, damn, what is Crawford going to cost?

    Reply
  144. Brod

    12 years ago

    I always new werth was gonna be in a nationals uniform ‘ but i was shocked when i first saw this because of the fact that they had some other plans ‘ but great signing now all they need is a first baseman and carlos pena has been they’re target seens he became a FA .

    Reply
  145. jwsox

    12 years ago

    wayy to long of a deal and wayy to much money for a guy who has had only 3 good seasons in his career and those seasons were played in a hitters dream of a ball park with ryan howard and chase utley in the line up with him…

    Reply
  146. Emanny

    12 years ago

    Wow, just insane. I now feel a lot better about Jason Bay.

    Reply
    • InLeylandWeTrust

      12 years ago

      I feel so much better about Vmart. I would have loved to have gotten Dunn, but his deal looks golden compared to Werth…

      Reply
  147. jwsox

    12 years ago

    look for crawford to be the biggest contract ever given to an out fielder now…im thinking 8 years 200 mill the lowest he will sign now is 8 yrs 180 i bet

    Reply
  148. CommissionerBart

    12 years ago

    A SEVEN year deal at ridiculous money for an OF about to be 32 in May? Rizzo is so Rizziculous. Couldn’t sign fan favorite Dunn for half that. And then picked up another FA with the savings.

    Rizzo is just trying to put his own stamp on the club regardless of the wisdom of his moves.

    Reply
  149. Jake Morris

    12 years ago

    Werth is horrible. This is one of the worst contracts in history. Without Utley and Howard and without the small park, Werth is a league average RF at the very best. Awful awful signing.

    Reply
    • nm344

      12 years ago

      Yeah I’m sure he’s horrible if you say so.

      Reply
  150. optionn

    12 years ago

    Wow, 18 million a year for a guy like this? I guess this is what the Phillies get for paying Howard 25 million a year- its a ripple effect. Crawford won’t be able to top this though.

    Reply
    • nm344

      12 years ago

      What does it have to do with the Phillies

      Reply
  151. Carter S

    12 years ago

    All you haters are just jealous

    Reply
    • InLeylandWeTrust

      12 years ago

      No…I am not jealous. Not at all actually. Not in the least bit. Jealous is the last thing I am believe me. I wanted Detroit to stay away from Werth for this reason. That contract is asinine.

      Reply
      • tiger313

        12 years ago

        im not sure about you, but i am excited for the winter meetings. what does dd have up his sleeve this year?

        Reply
        • Hoosierdaddy92

          12 years ago

          Colby Rasmus. Perhaps if the Tigers were willing to take Lohse’s bad contract and give a few prospects to St. Louis…..He would be a perfect fit for Detroit.

      • Guest

        11 years ago

        the others are

        Reply
  152. Jake Morris

    12 years ago

    Werth has got to be one of the most overrated players Ive ever seen. He benefited from a small park, help in a powerful lineup, and a winning team. You take him out of that situation and you have a declining .260-.340-.445 hitter for 7 years 18+ a season. I can’t believe they gave him that much.

    Reply
    • Guest

      11 years ago

      yeah their offense really looks like a juggernaut

      Reply
  153. optionn

    12 years ago

    This is ALL Scott Boras. He is the man who is meticulous about getting his clients PAID. He probably even had something to do with Werth’s long hair and appearance. Prepping him for this payday. The guy is a smooth lawyer.

    Reply
  154. bravos2010

    12 years ago

    It looks like Obama gave the Nats a bailout just so they can sign Werth. But seriously, if the Nats were going to overpay anyone it should have been at least Cliff Lee.

    Reply
  155. HipNip2009

    12 years ago

    Alfonso Soriano part two.

    Reply
  156. timlinCYecum55

    12 years ago

    Wow did not see this one coming. Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me either. They wouldn’t match the reasonable offer that Dunn received, but they’re willing to throw 7/$126M at Jayson Werth? I find it hard to believe that he’s still gonna be worth $20M a year when he’s 37-38 years old. Boston wouldn’t even give AGon that many years. Boras does it again.

    Reply
  157. HipNip2009

    12 years ago

    Go to a Nats game now, and you’ll pay $11 for a beer, $6 for a hot dog, $5 for a small bottled water. Guess who will pay for this contract……..

    And Crawford is going to get more??? What fools baseball owners are. This is the free market at its worst, for the average Joe struggling to make ends meet and being able to afford to take his kids to a ballgame. Does Rizzo really think Werth’s going to put fannies in the seats? What bozos they all are.

    Reply
  158. Eric

    12 years ago

    It’s hard to believe that the Nationals [66M payroll in 2010] would give a 31 yr old RF [With declining defensive statistics] a 7YR/126M deal.

    Reply
  159. TheRealMaxPower

    12 years ago

    Werth is going to earn this money. As a Phillies fan I appreciate all that he did the past few years. He had the luxury of hiding behind Howard, Utley, Rollins, and Ibanez who were all expected to perform above him. Werth got lost in the shuffle and really didn’t take a lot of blame when he failed to deliver. At that kind of money, those days are over. He will be questioned when he doesn’t get the big hit. For a guy that struggled terribly with runners in scoring position all year (.186),(.139 with 2 outs) He needs to step up his game. Even hitting fifth on the high scoring Phillies he never had 100 RBIs. He only had 85 last year and he stepped to the plate 652 times. This may go down as one of the worst signings ever when it is all said and done. I expect Werth to play well the next 2-3 years, but the end of that contract is a joke. Good for him though.

    Reply
    • InLeylandWeTrust

      12 years ago

      So you are trying to say he is NOT* going to earn the money…

      Reply
    • Jessamynn

      12 years ago

      I loved him too, but he’s NOT going to earn his money for the life of this contract. Best case scenario is that he maintains his current numbers for the next 4 years, and then gradually drops off over the remaining 3 years.

      Reply
  160. Steve_in_MA

    12 years ago

    Rizzo will be cutting this guy an $18MM check and mailing it to his room in the nursing home. Not so smart. But I’m glad it won’t be the Sox doing that.

    Reply
  161. jeter700

    12 years ago

    red sox fans just klnow this you will always play second to the evil empire thats just the way it is by the way lee and crawford will be yankees it sucks to be a red sox fan…

    Reply
    • tiger313

      12 years ago

      so you are commenting on a Werth signing by attack Red Sox fans for no reason. Plus you think that the Yanks are going to sign Lee and Crawford. Please take your head out of your butt. In no way does this comment belong here.

      Reply
    • flickadave

      12 years ago

      Werth got more than Jeter HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Reply
  162. Gurvir Nijjar

    12 years ago

    what !!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  163. zartan

    12 years ago

    The Werth contract is amazingly bad. Too many years and too much money for just a “good” player. He isn’t an elite outfielder. He is a career .272 hitter with decent power. Could you imagine what Ted Williams would make now? 35 million a year?

    Reply
  164. Jman1213

    12 years ago

    Any of you catch Sandy Alderson’s comments? “It makes some of our contracts look pretty good.” Also, “I thought they were trying to reduce the deficit in Washington.”

    Reply
  165. tbell11

    12 years ago

    hcuhus

    Reply
  166. tbell11

    12 years ago

    The Red Sox just lost Werth to the Nat’s so they will probably go after Crawford but they don’t need him they just want him. If the Yankees get Cliff Lee then they won’t pursue Crawford. The Yankees and Red Sox can offer Crawford more years than the Angels like 7 or 8 but the Angels could offer him a 5 or 6 year deal worth more money per year. It all depends on how much Cliff Lee signs for and where and if Crawford wants more years or more money per year. I think Cliff lee goes to the Yankees and Carl Crawford goes to the Angels.

    Reply
  167. KeithLawSucksInStl

    12 years ago

    As a Cards fan, the Holliday deal is looking better already.

    Reply
  168. mrmet128

    12 years ago

    Sandy Alderson – “This deal makes our contracts look pretty good.”

    Reply
  169. tiger313

    12 years ago

    I dont know if this has been discussed because im not reading 200 comments about Beltre. But from a Werth standpoint, I would actually be pretty excited to play for Washington until 2018. I predict that in 2013 Washington will be playoff contenders. I would also be excited to be able to experience seeing Harper come up through the system and seeing Strasburg coming back from TJ. I am not sure of other pieces of the farm system but im sure that after all these horrible years they might pull a Tampa Bay, Werth will be in the middle of it all. From a player standpoint, I could see why he would choose Washington.

    Reply
    • Guest

      12 years ago

      Something tells me that if he signed with the Red Sox, there would be 1000 comments saying how great of a signing it was.

      Reply
      • tiger313

        12 years ago

        yeah probably. I know nothing about Washington and their payroll and I dont know how much they are willing to spend, but at this point what do they have to lose. I am actually excited for Washington. Its not my money so I dont care. But hopefully Harper is worth the hype. i cant wait to see this team in a couple of years.

        Reply
        • Guest

          12 years ago

          I think the positive of contracts like this is it shows that the ownership is serious about paying for top talent. Since 07, Werth’s worst year in terms of BA was 09, and he still slugged over .500 and had 99 RBIs. He’s definitely a good player, don’t know if I agree with the contract, but you gotta pay to win.

        • tiger313

          12 years ago

          Every contract handed out to the big free agents this year is a big overpay, but everyone is dishing out the money so it doesnt bother me. If the Nats could pitch and have a solid bullpen, they wouldnt be all that bad.

      • ThePunisher04

        12 years ago

        You can say that again, 90% of the people posting here aren’t even Nats fans. They just want to rain on our parade.

        Reply
      • flickadave

        12 years ago

        I think you underestimate how many Red Sox fans like the Nats. I think a lot of us are so used to rooting for the underdog that liking the Nats feels almost natural.

        Reply
        • Guest

          12 years ago

          Oh I’m not passing judgment on whether or not Sox fans like the Nats.

          My comment was aimed at the deal itself in the understanding that if the Sox got him, then their fans would love the deal but because they didn’t, they think it was a bad deal/Werth isn’t that good, etc..

          I don’t know if it was a good deal or not and I don’t think anybody does. Maybe it has options that we don’t know about. Maybe it’s crazily backloaded with options. Maybe it’s Albert Haynesworth-esque. Nobody knows. I’m sure there was a Cub fan or two that thought signing Soriano was a great move at the time too, hell I wanted him back in DC at the time, but I don’t think his output has been worth what they paid him, IMO. Time will tell the same with Werth.

        • flickadave

          12 years ago

          I think it’s a real looooongshot that statistically this works out to be a good deal for the Nats but everything isn’t statistics. This gives Nats fans someone to cheer for (or boo) for a long time and hopefully boosts your attendance rates and TV ratings to the point where the deal financially pays for itself.

          Good luck to the Nats in 2011!

        • Guest

          12 years ago

          I can agree with that assessment. Thanks for the good luck wishes, haha…we’re gonna need it. When your expectations are 1) Less than 100 losses, and 2) Not last in the division, you need all the luck you can get.

      • wakefield4life

        12 years ago

        not at the price he signed for. If they got him for around 4 years 80M, maybe.

        Reply
      • mateodh

        12 years ago

        Yes, and for good reason. The Red Sox can actually afford to overpay to get their guy. The Nationals could have signed Dunn and extended Zimmerman instead. The Sox can afford to do all of the above.

        Reply
    • getright11

      5 years ago

      Theyll trade for Scherzer too. I’ll bet anything.

      Reply
  170. ATL_Mindset

    12 years ago

    7 years?……. Really,7?

    Reply
  171. MetsEventually

    12 years ago

    Wow and the Nationals had so much promise to them…oh well Mets 2015 OR EVENTUALLY YUH YUH YUH.

    Reply
  172. ice_hawk1002

    12 years ago

    well this is a strange one… werth aint a bad player, but this has vernon wells written all over it.

    Reply
  173. Ernesto Figueroa

    12 years ago

    Congratulations to the Nationals & Jayson Werth on agreeing to a pact.I wish both parties lots of success.

    Reply
  174. Dylan Zane

    12 years ago

    Oh My GOD WHERE DID THIS COME FROM… I WALK IN THE DOOR AND THIS HAPPENED!

    Reply
  175. P.J. Lowry

    12 years ago

    If the Nats are this aggressive when making an offer to Lee… they might have a chance.

    Reply
  176. BlueCatuli

    12 years ago

    Congratulations Jayson! Everyone back home is proud of you!

    Reply
  177. JonATLBraves

    12 years ago

    This just increases the Braves losing against the Nats…

    Reply
    • Jessamynn

      12 years ago

      Funny thing is, you’re probably right – although losing a series to the Nats isn’t as bad as dropping 2 of 3 the Pirates in the middle of a playoff race (ouch!)

      I’m just messing with you 🙂

      Reply
  178. ThePunisher04

    12 years ago

    I find it funny that almost all the posters here are non-Nationals fans. I guess everyone has to rain on another team’s parade.

    Reply
  179. MDMV

    12 years ago

    Carl Crawford is a happy, happy man

    Reply
  180. DhmkJp

    12 years ago

    ;;ll

    Reply
  181. DhmkJp

    12 years ago

    Just imagine how much Boras will get Choo signed up for.. The Indians have no chance.

    Reply
  182. Hoosierdaddy92

    12 years ago

    The Brew Crew mentality is probably that they already have Casey McGee who can play 2b or 3b until 2015, and/or feel they can extend Weeks at 2b, thus not needing a 2b prospect in Lawrie, who may or may not be overexceeding expectations. They want to win now and are getting a pitcher that has pitched well in a hitter-friendly park in the AL East, and will not be overly expensive. If I were a Brewers fan, I would not mind this deal at all.

    Reply
  183. Andrew

    12 years ago

    I am a huge Nats fan. I have had season tickets since day 1. This is an idiotic deal. If you are going to over pay, spend the money on Crawford.

    Reply
    • Guest

      12 years ago

      Not sure why you’d prefer Crawford. Stat-wise, they look identical to me. Hell, Werth has a higher OPS, slugs higher, hits more HRs, and hits more RBIs. They steal about the same and Crawford has a better BA. Werth even has a better WAR.

      Reply
      • Jessamynn

        12 years ago

        What?? They do NOT steal the same — Crawford can steal 50 bags easily, while Werth will struggle to steal more than 20. Believe me, I watched every game Werth played in a Phillies uniform (not literally but you know what I mean).

        Crawford is a polished hitter, while Jayson is a streaky doubles hitter with 25-home run power outside of Citizens Bank Park and strikes out WAY too much (146 Ks last year).

        Werth is an really nice all-around player, and I’m sure the Nats fans will enjoy watching him play, but the contract is still bad.

        Reply
        • Guest

          12 years ago

          OK, I was wrong about one stat. However I stand by my initial premise that they are very similar in statistics. Yes he strikes out a lot but so did Adam Dunn and he ended up being alright in DC (not to mention that Crawford’s SOs have been increasing though not close to Werth’s). Again, whether the contract was bad or not is yet to be determined. If it were my say, I most likely would have not paid him that much or signed him for that long but quantitatively concluding that he won’t amount to the worth of the contract is a conclusion that impossible to reach at this time. If in a couple years he turns out to be a Nyjer Moran-ish player, then you would be correct. However we don’t know what he will do in DC yet.

        • Jessamynn

          12 years ago

          I understand where you’re coming from – I apologize if I came off too strongly – I didn’t mean to.

          As I said before, you Nats fans will absolutely enjoy watching him play.

  184. Hoosierdaddy92

    12 years ago

    This was a chess piece move for Boras. By having his Top OF client sign for a colossal overpay that goes deep into his 30s, his other top free agent clients that are looking for contracts in their mid-to-late 30s, will be overpaid as well. The A-Gonz trade does not help Beltre’s value, but this signing sure does help to make up for it.

    Reply
  185. yankees92

    12 years ago

    watch out for the nats in a few years. strasburg, harper, zimmerman, webb if hes signed and stays healthy. they’re turning into the rays. years of high draft picks are going to develop except the only difference from the rays is that the nats have more money than the rays ever will.

    Reply
  186. SoCalAngelsFan75

    12 years ago

    If this means Crawford is gong to cost $160/8yrs then I’m not sure I want him. Our only hope is that some other non-contending team pays that and keeps him out of BOS and NYY. Do the Royals or Pirates have money to burn?

    Reply
  187. Lanidrac

    12 years ago

    Bummer for the Phillies. They couldn’t resign Werth, and they won’t even get a first round pick now.

    Reply
  188. Chris

    12 years ago

    Can you imagine if Washington kept Dunn and signed Werth

    Zimmerman
    Dunn
    Werth

    Would of been the start of something special

    Reply
  189. vonhayesdays

    12 years ago

    wow seven years , hears to the nat winning in 2016, and mlb and bud selig still giving them money, after all they are the new devil rays , oh yeah they didnt win , here to werth batting 280 and hitting 20 hrs and 90 rbi for a team that doesnt even sniff the playoffs for five years , and is baseball nothing more than taking the most money, as if 80 million wouldnt make you rich , Scott Boras needs a bullet to the brain……

    Reply
  190. vonhayesdays

    12 years ago

    wow if they kept dunn and signed werth they would be the yankees ouch scott boras down fall of baseball

    Reply
  191. vonhayesdays

    12 years ago

    wow werth but not werth that much much and if the nats could have kept dunn and werth and zimmerman they would be the yankees, and i hope the playoffs in 2016 taste good nats, and you better pray that bryce harper doesnt sign scott boras or he will be werth 30 million a year. SCOTT BORAS RUINED BASEBALL, i said it

    Reply
  192. Yastrzemski

    12 years ago

    I am a Red Sox fan and I’m not, and never have been a Werth fan and didn’t want him. I do, however, think that he would be better numbers wise if he had went to Boston. First off, I think a large part of his success in Philly was the lineup he was a part of. I would think he would see more fastballs cause I would rather pitch to Werth than Howard or Utley. After Zimmerman and MAYBE Willingham there is not a whole lot bats that would force pitchers to pitch to him. In Boston I think he would have been more protected in that lineup. Secondly, I think the change in parks will show in his numbers too. Citizens Bank had very cozy dimensions and I think some of the balls he hit for HRs at CBP would be HRs or doubles at Fenway while they will be outs in Washington. Although, I could very well be wrong and he could smack 40+ HR this year. Hopefully he’ll work out for you Nationals fans.

    Reply
  193. ludafish

    12 years ago

    Ugh this deal makes me sick. Just look at his careers numbers. Once he has had a WAR of 5 or better, never 100RBI’s, batted less than .200 with risp last season, never batted over .300, strikes out a lot…oh god it is sickening. im not calling the guy a nobody, but there is no way he deserves that money. it makes you wonder what Pujols will sign for or Hanley when they hit free agency. I though Uggla was greedy for turning down 4/48 and while werth is MUCH better defensively Uggla is there or better offensively and deserves whatever Werth makes. Its just sickening that an average player is making the elite money. look up the people that signed deals like him, he doesnt belong anywhere near them. this is the kind of thing that ruins baseball. any player better than him will expect more money now, and why shouldnt they?

    Reply
  194. Jesusisthatyou

    12 years ago

    As a Redsox fan i’m thrilled they did not sign this guy. He has never put up 100 RBI’s in a season and has a 162 game average almost about the same as Luke Scott. He has done nothing to deserve that much money. Can you say J.D. Drew?

    Reply
  195. TapDancingTeddy

    12 years ago

    How does Boras do this to teams? Does he travel to their offices with a concealed crack pipe? Does he have Jedi mind powers? Does he kidnap team executives’ children?This type of crazy overpay with one team bidding against itself usually only happens to the Yankees. Oh, well, they’ll have their turn with Cliff Lee or with Crawford if Lee doesn’t sign with them first.

    Reply
    • Jessamynn

      12 years ago

      It’s kinda like asking how the mean hot girl at school can constantly sucker boys into falling all over themselves for her. She (or in this case, Boras) has something they want.

      So while the boys probably know better, she just bats her eyes and blows you a kiss – and the next thing you know, you’re doing her homework and laundry while she borrows your car for a weekend road trip in which you offered to pay for gas.

      Don’t lie, you boys know what I’m talking about 😀

      Reply
      • Guest

        11 years ago

        ohhh yes i do..

        Reply
  196. boston3party123

    12 years ago

    this deal is almost as crooked as big bens nose

    Reply
  197. philsWSchamps

    12 years ago

    i would have KILLED Ruben Amaro had he signed Jayson to this deal. Soriano is a fair comparison and look how the Cubs are dreading that deal. The phils could sink 1/20th of this amount into the draft and scouting departments and come up with equal value in the future. Jayson is great, don’t get me wrong but he’s not a building block type player. If he gets this what does Zimmerman eventually get??? Good non-move. Now go trade for Willingham and save $15 million per year and spend it on more pitching.

    Reply
    • Jessamynn

      12 years ago

      I agree completely. Say what you want about the Phillies ownership or Ruben, but their hard “policy” about trying to stick around 3-4 years on contracts has helped them more than hurt them.

      Now only if they had remembered that “policy” when it came to Howard’s extension, but whatever.

      Reply
      • souldrummer

        12 years ago

        Dunn was a mighty big fan of that Howard deal.

        Reply
  198. Tony P.

    12 years ago

    Scott Boras is an ANIMAL…and Jayson Werth should be licking his shoes right now.

    Reply
  199. Dan Z

    12 years ago

    Christmas came early for Mr. Werth. He just robbed Santa Claus and the Nats at the same time. This could rank as one of the worst free agent signings in history. This is the reason salaries in MLB are so out of whack, the overpaying of a player the likes of Werth. He’s a 31 year-old late bloomer who has never driven in 100 runs, strikes out far too much, and will never be the player a team can build around. What can the Nats be thinking? I’m glad Dave Dombrowski bowed out of this bidding war, this was akin to paying for Secretariat and getting a $5,000 claimer.

    Reply
  200. danimal0630

    12 years ago

    I never, in my wildest imagination, thought that anything could make me feel good about the Soriano deal! Thank you Nationals!

    Seriously though, I know I’m late to the party as I’ve been out of town the past few days, but when did Jayson Werth become an 18 mil per year OFer? Is it too early to say this is the worst signing in MLB history?

    Reply
  201. Guest

    11 years ago

    good deal rizzo we’re on the way up!

    Reply
  202. SundownDevil

    5 years ago

    Flashback!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Option Vaughn Grissom, Braden Shewmake

    Jose Altuve To Undergo Surgery On Fractured Thumb

    Rockies To Sign Jurickson Profar

    Jose Altuve Leaves WBC Game After Hit By Pitch

    Edwin Diaz Undergoes Surgery To Repair Patellar Tendon

    Out Of Options 2023

    Cade Cavalli To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Edwin Diaz Helped Off Field With Right Knee Injury

    José Quintana Out Until At Least July Due To Rib Surgery

    Trevor Bauer Signs With NPB’s Yokohama DeNA BayStars

    Craig Stammen “Highly Unlikely” To Pitch Again Following Shoulder Injury

    Diamondbacks, Corbin Carroll Agree To Eight-Year Deal

    Nationals Sign Keibert Ruiz To Eight-Year Extension

    Rockies Showing Interest In Jurickson Profar

    Andrew Painter Diagnosed With UCL Sprain; Ranger Suarez Dealing With Forearm Tightness

    Marlins, Jose Iglesias Agree To Minor League Contract

    Marlins In Agreement With Yuli Gurriel On Minor League Deal

    Carlos Rodon, Tommy Kahnle, Lou Trivino To Begin Season On IL

    Mitch Moreland Announces Retirement

    Astros Facing Gaps In Extension Talks With Kyle Tucker, Framber Valdez

    Recent

    Latest On D-Backs’ Rotation

    Matt Foster Diagnosed With Forearm Strain

    Adrian Houser Expected To Begin Season In Brewers’ Bullpen

    Competition Committee Evaluating Potential Alterations To 2023 Rule Changes

    Rockies Option Nolan Jones

    Braves Option Vaughn Grissom, Braden Shewmake

    Red Sox’ Joely Rodríguez Diagnosed With Grade 2 Oblique Strain

    Phillies Acquire Jordan Qsar From Rays

    Angels’ José Marte Shut Down For Four Weeks With Stress Reaction In Elbow

    Rangers Plan To Use Robbie Grossman As Primary Left Fielder

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Offseason Outlook Series
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2023
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2023-24 MLB Free Agent List
    • MLB Player Chats
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version