Headlines

  • Blue Jays Sign George Springer
  • Nationals Re-Sign Ryan Zimmerman
  • Red Sox, Enrique Hernandez Agree To Deal
  • Angels Sign Jose Quintana
  • Astros Sign Jason Castro
  • Marlins, Anthony Bass Agree To Two-Year Deal
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Indians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • Last 100 Comments
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Which Free Agents Will Be Offered Arbitration?

By Tim Dierkes | November 23, 2011 at 8:19am CDT

As the clock ticks down toward tonight's free agent arbitration offer deadline at 11pm central time, we at MLBTR reminisce about all the good times we had deciphering the Elias ranking system.  

Things will be simpler in 2012, as traded players won't be eligible for draft pick compensation, arbitration offers will come much earlier, and there will be only one group of free agents subject to compensation.  Instead of players being designated as Type A based on lame statistics chosen by MLB and the players union decades ago, it'll just be a question of whether the former team offers a guaranteed one-year contract with a salary equal to the average salary of the 125-highest paid players from the prior season.  That seems to equal $12.4MM at present, but it'll surely rise each year.  The bottom line: a team has to be willing to risk a sizeable one-year commitment to have a shot at draft pick compensation.  Gone are the days of Scott Downs and Grant Balfour costing or providing a team draft picks.  Perhaps more significantly, there's no Type B equivalent.  In 2011 alone the Padres, Rays, and Blue Jays gained 10 picks between the first and second rounds as a result of losing middling free agents like Yorvit Torrealba, Brad Hawpe, and Kevin Gregg.

We still have Elias rankings to consider for this offseason, however.  We have a good idea of what will happen with the 20 current Type A free agents.  Matt Capps, Francisco Cordero, Octavio Dotel, Ramon Hernandez, and Darren Oliver will be treated as Type B players, and don't require arbitration offers for their teams to receive a supplemental draft pick as compensation.  This modification is a win for the Twins and Reds, who probably weren't going to offer arbitration to Capps and Cordero.  It's also, of course, a win for these players, who don't come with the draft pick cost attached.

Another change helps Type As Heath Bell, Michael Cuddyer, Kelly Johnson, Ryan Madson, Francisco Rodriguez, Josh Willingham, and their teams: these six players will not cost a draft pick for their new teams if they turn down arbitration offers, yet the former teams still receive two picks.  All these players are seeking multiyear deals, so all figure to receive and turn down arbitration offers, except for perhaps Rodriguez.  I have a feeling Scott Boras clients are a bit less open to handshake agreements to turn down arbitration, as the Rays couldn't pull that off with Carlos Pena last year.  With K-Rod earning $11.5MM in 2011, the Brewers still risk him accepting and taking a one-year deal for 2012 at a higher salary if they offer arbitration.  Still, if Boras feels there's three years, $30MM, and a closing job out there for Rodriguez, I imagine he'll still advise his client to turn down an arbitration offer.

As MLBTR's Ben Nicholson-Smith noted yesterday, remaining Type A free agents Albert Pujols, Prince Fielder, C.J. Wilson, David Ortiz, Roy Oswalt, Jose Reyes, and Jimmy Rollins are still under the old rules, while Takashi Saito and Carlos Beltran contractually cannot be offered arbitration.  Of the first seven, the Phillies may choose not to offer arbitration to Oswalt given his salary.  I think an arbitration offer for Ortiz from the Red Sox is likely, but less certain than the others.

We also have 32 Type B free agents for whom decisions are due tonight.  Those with a good chance of receiving an arbitration offer, in my opinion: Aramis Ramirez, Alex Gonzalez, Mark Buehrle, Jason Kubel, Frank Francisco, Bruce Chen, Edwin Jackson, Kerry Wood, Freddy Garcia, Jose Molina, and Shawn Camp.  There will probably be others, with the unpredictable element of players privately agreeing to decline, as we saw with Hawpe, Trevor Hoffman, and Javier Vazquez last year.

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Uncategorized

Quick Hits: Draft, Papelbon, Indians, D’Backs, Pirates
Main
Pirates Sign Jake Fox, Five Others
20 comments
newest oldest

Comments

  1. JacksTigers

    9 years ago

    I could not be happier with how this turned out.

    Like
    Reply
  2. jb226

    9 years ago

    I was thinking about this a bit last night.  A lot of focus has been on how middling free agents won’t result in compensation (because who is going to offer them ~$12.4MM/yr?) and that is for good reason.  But isn’t the flip side of that coin that arbitration offers that used to be somewhat risky become gimmies? 

    It used to be that you had to offer arbitration, which would almost always result in a raise from whatever the base is.  Now you just have to offer $12.4MM, unless I’m missing something.  Anybody who is coming off a contract more than that amount and who hasn’t completely fallen apart would be downright insulted by that offer, guaranteeing both the compensation and that the player will move elsewhere (which is typically what a team wants when they offer arb under the current system).  Use Roy Oswalt as an example.  Tim thinks the Phillies would be wary of offering him arbitration, and with good reason.  Now imagine the new rules were in effect; is there much chance they wouldn’t go “here’s $12.4MM, lulz” and watch him walk?  Same with people like Buerhle.  They already make more and there’s no reason to believe they wil take a pay cut, so it’s basically automatic.

    I don’t think this is a big deal by any means, I just don’t believe I have seen it mentioned yet.

    Like
    Reply
    • Mike Lynch

      9 years ago

      In your example Oswalt will probably get a pay cut.  If the 12.4M option was offered to Oswalt this year he would probably end up taking it.  It would be “show you I’m healthy” option to get another multiyear deal.

      Like
      Reply
      • Tim Dierkes

        9 years ago

        jb raises a great point.  Oswalt is a good example.  I am curious though if there is a “maximum cut” salary rule in there.

        Like
        Reply
      • Tim Dierkes

        9 years ago

        jb raises a great point.  Oswalt is a good example.  I am curious though if there is a “maximum cut” salary rule in there.

        Like
        Reply
      • Double D

        9 years ago

        Why are some players still under the old rules? I thought these changes were across the board…

        Like
        Reply
        • Mike Lynch

          9 years ago

          Double D, this year’s offseason is based on the last CBA not the new CBA agreement.  This offseason still has the Type A/Type B FA which you have offer arbitration to in order to get compensation (Other than the Type A’s that were re-classified as Type B’s).

          The qualifying offer to receive compensation goes into effect next offseason.

          Like
          Reply
          • Double D

            9 years ago

            thanks, but it’s still odd they they reclassified some relievers, such as Madson, which screws the Phils.  Why bother doing that?  Change everything or nothing this year.

            Like
            Reply
            • Steve_in_MASteve_in_MA

              9 years ago

              Its to protect teams that have made deals in reliance of the old rules.  The split is intended to make sure that everyone gets what they bargained for during this offseason, and the new rules get fully implemented afterward.  They’re trying for a smooth transition.

              Like
              Reply
            • Mike Lynch

              9 years ago

              Also it really doesn’t screw the Phil’s and may actually help them as they will still get a 1st round pick and a comp pick when a team signs Madson, it is just the team that signs him doesn’t have to give up their 1st round draft pick.

              I think that they really wanted to put all of the Type A’s in Madson’s category put the Phillies would’ve gone ballistic if they were the only team to lose their 1st rounder since they signed Papelbon prior to the CBA changes.  As a compromise the left the top tier type A’s alone.

              Like
              Reply
        • Mike Lynch

          9 years ago

          Double D, this year’s offseason is based on the last CBA not the new CBA agreement.  This offseason still has the Type A/Type B FA which you have offer arbitration to in order to get compensation (Other than the Type A’s that were re-classified as Type B’s).

          The qualifying offer to receive compensation goes into effect next offseason.

          Like
          Reply
  3. Brv Rocks14 Rocks

    9 years ago

    The Braves will not offer Alex Gonzalez arbitration.  They are too afraid that he would accept it.

    Like
    Reply
    • carpengui

      9 years ago

      Maybe, but given the shortstop market right now, they might actually be able to trade him, too.  Frankly, having him as a fall-back option would not be the worst thing in the world:  better to play from a hand of strength than not.

      So yes, I bet arb is offered to Seabass (and I also bet he declines – he knows what Barmes just got, for instance).

      MY QUESTION:  What’s the deadline on acceptance of these arbitration offers made to your own free agents?

      Like
      Reply
      • Brv Rocks14 Rocks

        9 years ago

        It was just reported by the AJC that the Braves will not offer Gonzalez arbitration.  No more pouty face flailing away at the plate next year.  Yippppeeeee!!

        Like
        Reply
        • carpengui

          9 years ago

          Huh.  I sit corrected.

          Like
          Reply
      • Mike Lynch

        9 years ago

        Alan, the players have until Dec. 7 to accept or decline the arbitration offers

        Like
        Reply
        • carpengui

          9 years ago

          Excellent – thanks.

          Like
          Reply
    • carpengui

      9 years ago

      Maybe, but given the shortstop market right now, they might actually be able to trade him, too.  Frankly, having him as a fall-back option would not be the worst thing in the world:  better to play from a hand of strength than not.

      So yes, I bet arb is offered to Seabass (and I also bet he declines – he knows what Barmes just got, for instance).

      MY QUESTION:  What’s the deadline on acceptance of these arbitration offers made to your own free agents?

      Like
      Reply
  4. Steve_in_MASteve_in_MA

    9 years ago

    I think its an absolute given that the BoSox will offer Ortiz arbitration, since they’ve already made him a contract offer.  What is there to lose if we are willing to have him back?  If he declines and walks, we get two compensatory picks.  If he accepts, we either work out a one-year deal (maybe with an option), or go to arbitration, where he gets a one-year deal.

    Like
    Reply
  5. Steve_in_MASteve_in_MA

    9 years ago

    I think its an absolute given that the BoSox will offer Ortiz arbitration, since they’ve already made him a contract offer.  What is there to lose if we are willing to have him back?  If he declines and walks, we get two compensatory picks.  If he accepts, we either work out a one-year deal (maybe with an option), or go to arbitration, where he gets a one-year deal.

    Like
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Blue Jays Sign George Springer

    Nationals Re-Sign Ryan Zimmerman

    Red Sox, Enrique Hernandez Agree To Deal

    Angels Sign Jose Quintana

    Astros Sign Jason Castro

    Marlins, Anthony Bass Agree To Two-Year Deal

    Twins Sign J.A. Happ

    Padres To Re-Sign Jurickson Profar

    Hank Aaron Passes Away

    Astros To Re-Sign Michael Brantley

    Recent

    Reds Acquire Cionel Perez From Astros

    Blue Jays Sign George Springer

    Nationals Re-Sign Ryan Zimmerman

    Free Agent Notes: Ozuna, Semien, Simmons, Miller, Moreland, Richards

    Cubs Sign Austin Romine

    Braves Claim Victor Arano, Kyle Garlick

    Red Sox, Enrique Hernandez Agree To Deal

    Latest On Trevor Bauer

    AL News & Rumors: G. Richards, BoSox, Twins, Cruz, Angels, Astros

    Astros Designate Humberto Castellanos

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Trevor Bauer Rumors
    • Kris Bryant Rumors
    • J.T. Realmuto Rumors
    • Marcell Ozuna Rumors
    • Masahiro Tanaka Rumors
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Indians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version