Headlines

  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Phillies Notes: Roster, Hamels, Sizemore

By charliewilmoth | August 16, 2014 at 1:06pm CDT

With the Phillies having retained most of their veteran players through the trading season, Ryne Sandberg is trying to figure out how to juggle playing time for his current roster, Matt Gelb of the Inquirer writes. That could get even tougher next month, as rosters expand and players like infielders Maikel Franco, Freddy Galvis and Cesar Hernandez come aboard, Gelb points out. “As of right now, it’s to give everybody looks and playing opportunity,” says Sandberg. “Let everybody participate. Now, September could be a little tricky, too, with some added numbers. It’ll be more challenging then.” GM Ruben Amaro recently said the Phillies are still trying to win as much as they can, which likely means playing veterans, even thought the Phillies are 54-68. Here’s more from Philadelphia.

  • If the Phillies were to trade Cole Hamels, they would want three or four top prospects in return, and they’d want to avoid eating any of the $96MM remaining on his contract after 2014, Gelb writes. The Phillies think Hamels could provide a big head start as they attempt to change their fortunes. “He’d be tough to replace,” Says Sandberg. “We have question marks about Cliff [Lee]. Cliff, we won’t know. A.J. [Burnett], we don’t know. You have to start your staff somewhere and he’d be a good place to start.”
  • The Phillies could have interest in bringing veteran outfielder Grady Sizemore back next season, MLB.com’s Todd Zolecki writes. “He’s played well enough to certainly be in consideration for 2015 and beyond,” says Amaro. “But again that’s one of those questions we’ll continue to assess.” Sizemore has hit .305/.347/.432 in 101 plate appearances with the Phillies since being released by the Red Sox in June. Marlon Byrd, Domonic Brown and Ben Revere all now figure to be part of the Phillies’ outfield in 2015. As Zolecki points out, Sizemore has out-hit both Brown and Revere, although both of them are much younger than Sizemore.
Share 6 Retweet 20 Send via email0

Philadelphia Phillies Cole Hamels Grady Sizemore

Indians Notes: Kluber, Brantley, Willingham
Main
Quick Hits: Bailey, Wada, Astros
View Comments (58)
Post a Comment

58 Comments

  1. Mikenmn

    11 years ago

    Without dissing Hamels, the problem with asking the acquiring team to take his entire contract plus 3-4 top prospects is that there would be no compelling reason for them to do that, when they could try to sign a free agent in the off-season, like Lester, who would cost them about the same average value, perhaps for another year or two. Especially in light of all these season-ending serious injuries, i think a lot of teams are going to be very wary of offering very long term deals to any pitchers. So, Hamels may be better off where he is now, because his price is so very high.

    Reply
    • bagpipes5

      11 years ago

      There will be a half dozen or more teams looking for Jon Lester in the offseason .But only 1 team can sign him.

      Hamels value(3 prospects) is fair. If You lose out on Lester. You can save cost certainty with Hamels ( $90 M compared to say Lester $150 M ???)

      Reply
      • oh Hal

        11 years ago

        Fair is tough to define, but in my opinion 3 premium prospects is unrealistic. I’d say the same about two as well.

        Reply
      • saidin09

        11 years ago

        More like more than a dozen will be in on Lester. They want 3 or 4 premium prospects and contract relief…. not happening. 2 of a teams top 20 and a lower level kid, plus Phils eat 20 mill.

        Reply
  2. YankeePhan1234

    11 years ago

    Why does Amaro still want to win as many games as possible this year? They’re 14 games under 500 and they have a chance to see what kind of pieces they have for next year and beyond. If anything they have an incentive to lose for the Higher Draft pick next year. I mean once you’re already guaranteed out of the race and way under 500, whats the difference between winning 70 games as apposed to 73 or 74?

    Reply
    • LazerTown

      11 years ago

      Agree, but at the same thing he shouldn’t come out and say that. If your not contender then you should be doing what is going to get you back to being one asap.

      Reply
      • YankeePhan1234

        11 years ago

        I agree, he shouldn’t come out and say “We’re trying to lose so we can get a better draft pick for next year”. But in the end what is going to get you back to being a contender faster, winning a few more games in an already lost season, or evaluating your prospects against MLB competition without the pressure of a pennant race and getting a higher draft pick the next year?

        Reply
    • joeythew

      11 years ago

      He wants to retain his job.

      Reply
      • YankeePhan1234

        11 years ago

        Funny thing is though, by not evaluating and preparing for next year, they’re just going to be in the exact same spot and he’s still going to be on the chopping block.

        Reply
  3. griffey9988

    11 years ago

    Why would any team trade 3-4 top prospects and take on that much salary when they could just sign a free agent in the offseason for similar years and dollars? Sure, the years and dollars involved would be a bit higher for a free agent but certainly worth not giving up 3-4 top prospects to do so.

    Reply
    • bagpipes5

      11 years ago

      Do you consider $90 M a Bit Higher? Scherzer is reportedly looking for Verlander money? $180 M. Hamels will be owed 1/2 of that.

      Reply
    • jeffm

      11 years ago

      Gotta remember too that Hamels is only signed through age 34 while the impending FA will likely be getting somewhere around $25M/year through their age 37-38 seasons. Hamels doesn’t have much risk of dead money years compared to that.

      Reply
  4. LazerTown

    11 years ago

    Yes, Hamels price is somewhat lower than Scherzer or Lester, but I really have a hard time seeing them take on Hamels contract + give up 3-4 top prospects just to get him. Prospects are worth money too, just because they have the potential to be an insane bargain.

    Reply
  5. DarthMurph

    11 years ago

    RAJ’s plan is simple. He’s made ridiculous asking prices so that he can keep all his players and sign more in the offseason in a halfhearted attempt to patch up the sinking ship with a bandaid. I’m surprised he hasn’t traded for Alex Rios.

    Reply
    • Jaysfan1994 2

      11 years ago

      Preciously, he knows management wouldn’t stand for retaining his services in a rebuild as very few GM’s are able to keep their job when the team suffers so many losing seasons during the said rebuild. Then again, The Phillies are losing lots even when they’re spending on top Free Agents, so I don’t see why they can’t lose 100 games with a 80M payroll when they’re doing the same thing with a 180M payroll.

      Management must think too many Philadelphia fans would jump off the bandwagon if the team went through a rebuild, otherwise they would’ve fired Ruben a long time ago for failing to succeed with them having so much major league talent.

      Reply
      • DarthMurph

        11 years ago

        I don’t even really blame him anymore. He’s keeping the problem going because he knows he’s not part of the solution. Ownership needs to make a change.

        Reply
        • Jaysfan1994 2

          11 years ago

          Yes, although what he’s doing is delaying the inevitable and probably ruining his chance to ever work again as the General Manager of another organization, although that chance probably died off a long time even before this season started.

          Reply
  6. James F

    11 years ago

    Amaro was asking for the same thing for Cliff Lee last year.

    Reply
    • DarthMurph

      11 years ago

      He was basically asking for the same thing for Cliff Lee this year too even when he was first on the DL. We have yet to hear a rational trade discussion come from the Phillies this year.

      Reply
      • MB923

        11 years ago

        Pretty much. Though I believe I read for Lee he would be willing to pay Some of his salary (around $10-$20 million)

        Reply
      • Phillyfan425

        11 years ago

        No where has it been reported (at least in Philly) what he was looking for from Lee (this year or last year). And the only “rumor” that came out about Hamels was that he was looking for the Dodgers top 3 prospects – which was followed by a report less than 2 days later, that the first one was inaccurate.
        As far as other trade candidates, while his asking price for a guy like Byrd may be a little high (assuming he asked for Judge from the Yanks) – the rumored “counter-offer” from Seattle was a pair of A+ or lower arms with 6+ ERAs. I’d say that RAJ’s ask was a little more reasonable than what others were offering him.

        Reply
        • Bored Spitless

          11 years ago

          Well since he hasn’t made any trades in the last month or so I would have to say that his asking prices haven’t been “reasonable”. Rumors are just that and no one knows for sure what was offered until a trade has been accepted.

          Reply
          • NotCanon

            11 years ago

            Um, he traded Roberto Hernandez for two PTBNL (one of whom is now named).

            Reply
  7. bagpipes5

    11 years ago

    The Phillies attendance is down 50% from 2011. TV viewership down from 300,000 per game to less than 90,000.

    The hope for Philadelphia is that they have a $3 B TV deal beginning in 2016 so quick change isnt impossible if the right moves are made.

    First move should begin in the front office.

    Phils outfield, starting pitching staff,bench need to be completely rebuilt.

    Reply
    • Phillies fan

      11 years ago

      Not true. The lineup is good enough. What they need is to go get an abundance of pitching. And keep Cole Hamels. Its not crazy to say that, with 3 good starting pitchers in free agency, this is a borderline playoff team.

      Reply
      • CPRoark

        11 years ago

        I’m a big Phillies fan, but I would not in any way categorize them as a “borderline playoff” team in any sense. Dumping money into starting pitching won’t help; ask Cole Hamels if he’s happy with his run support this year. While good pitching can win you games, you still need an offense that’s at least average.

        Their outfield is historically bad. As is Ryan Howard; despite all of his RBIs, he is having one of the 10 or so worst offensive seasons for a clean up hitter. Revere’s .300 average is similarly deceptive…he has no power and draws too few walks to be a good player.

        Also, dumping money into veterans is a bandage…one which we’ve used for too long. At some point, a team needs to develop its own talent. Outside of Pat Burrell, I don’t think the Phillies have grown a productive outfielder for at least 40 years.

        Reply
    • Phillyfan425

      11 years ago

      Do you have actual sources to back up the first 2 statements, or are you just making them up on a whim? The “total attendance” is at 50% of the 2011 total – but that’s with nearly 20 home games remaining.

      Reply
      • stl_cards16

        11 years ago

        I’m with you. I don’t follow TV ratings. But even 300,000 seems incredibly low? Maybe I’m way off here?

        Reply
        • Phillyfan425

          11 years ago

          It was 276,000 households per game in 2011 (so already, he’s fibbed a stat to make it seem like a more substantial drop than it is – he rounded up by about 25,000 – or nearly 10%). They fell to 168,000 households per game in 2012 and 100,000 in 2013. It should be noted, that during their “successful” non-playoff seasons in the mid-00s, they were averaging about 160,000 per game. But he’s completely made up the 90,000 this year (because the numbers don’t get released till the end of the year).

          Reply
          • joeythew

            11 years ago

            it’s safe to say it’s no better than last year 100,000 since they’re playing worse this year – so 90,000 is probably right on the mark.

            Reply
  8. bigbadjohnny

    11 years ago

    “Phillies want 3 or 4 top prospects and avoid paying Hamels salary in a Hamels trade”……….looks like Philadelphia FO lives in a “Dream World”

    Reply
  9. bigbadjohnny

    11 years ago

    Phillies use to have great teams & FO in 70’s & 80’s.
    Now they are becoming a joke.

    Reply
    • Ray Ray 4

      11 years ago

      The Phillies were a bigger joke in the 70s and 80s except for 1980. They were horrible despite having several HOF players (and Pete Rose) on the team at various times. The 2000s was about the only decade ever when the Phillies were consistently a good team.

      Reply
      • KJ4realz

        11 years ago

        It is really said when you beat success they had was about a 10 year stretch, yet the first 4 of those (03-06) they couldn’t get over the hump finishing around or a few games over .500. The funny thing is, with Phillies history, calling a 4 year stretch from 0-10 games above .500 a success is quite sad.

        They got lucky with such a good crop of home grown talent at the right time and savvy moves finally from 07-09. Then Raj happened.

        Reply
        • Phillyfan425

          11 years ago

          Then RAJ happened – and took the team to increasing win totals in each of his first 3 years. Maxing out at the franchise win record in 2011 before his star (that he signed for a contract too early – but for fewer years than his contemporaries) blew out his Achilles in a playoff game.

          Look, RAJ has done a lot of wrong in the last 2.5 years – but he also did a lot right in the first 3 years. The problem is everyone just wants to forget about that.

          Reply
      • jeffm

        11 years ago

        From 1975-’83 (9 seasons) they posted a winning record each year, went to the playoffs 6 times winning 2 NL pennants and a WS. They were a consistently good team.

        Reply
        • bigbadjohnny

          11 years ago

          They were really good back then…..only the Dodgers, Reds & Pirates were in their way for more WS titles.

          Reply
  10. petrie000

    11 years ago

    so the Phillies want more top prospects than Jeff Samardzija, Jon Lester and David Price netted combined while thinking they don’t have to eat a penny of his remaining salary?

    do we need any more evidence than that that the first step the Phillies need to make to get better is to clean out the front office?

    Reply
    • Phillyfan425

      11 years ago

      Well, considering that Hamels has more controllable years (4 – with an option for a 5th) than the guys you listed had (1.5 for Shark, .5 for Lester, 1.5 for Price) and is substantially better than Shark. Season-wise, he’s on pace with Lester – but put together a better career than him. And career (and season) wise, he’s equal to Price.

      I agree that 3 “top prospects” might be a little higher. But within days of the first rumor coming out, a second came out saying that no specific discussion had taken place. Asking for a package of 2 top prospects (top 100 overall), 1 good (top 10 organizational), and a flyer (low level, high risk) is a reasonable package.

      Reply
      • petrie000

        11 years ago

        2 top prospects (plus more lesser ones) is a perfectly reasonable asking price, don’t get me wrong. Hamels is a darn fine pitcher in his own right and the Phillies shouldn’t just give him away.

        the contract, though, is a bit odd. Price’s at at 1.5 is probably more valuable on the open market than Hammels 20+ over 4. If something goes catastrophically wrong with Price… the Team’s not on the hook for that much. If Hamels gets hurt…. yeah, giving up an extra top prospect for that risk isn’t something i think a lot of teams would be lining up to do. The team trading for him is assuming all the potential risks as well as the rewards, and after what happened to Lincecum, Zito and Verlander, just to name a few, well, i’m not sure the long term contract is a huge bargaining chip in the Phillies favor.

        Reply
        • Phillyfan425

          11 years ago

          I think the contract will be a bargaining chip this winter – when the FA’s of Lester, Shields, and Scherzer come round asking for 6-8 years and $24+ M. And there will sit Hamels for just 4 years (with a 5th year option) at $22.5 M.
          I think there are a limited number of teams that should/could go after him. They’d be (in my eyes) the Cubs, Dodgers, Yankees, BoSox (because he’d fit their “model” of not giving pitchers longer deals), and maybe a mystery team. So you’re limiting him to 4-5 suitors. There is inherent risk with every pitcher. Same as there is with every prospect.

          Reply
          • petrie000

            11 years ago

            there in lies the rub, though. Hamels isn’t the first option because the teams looking to spend that much on a staring pitcher can have one just as good for roughly the same AAV… without coughing up the prospects for it. So Hamels as a trade option is plan B, not plan A.

            And of the teams you mentioned, the ones both willing to spend the kind of money and have the prospects the Phillies are looking for… well that list is pretty much just the Cubs and the Dodgers… and both have already given the Phillies a pretty definite ‘no’ at the price Amaro’s asking.

            Reply
            • Phillyfan425

              11 years ago

              While it may cost the same amount of AAV – they’ll have to pay for 2-4 more years. That’s big. Because with Hamels, you are only paying him through his age 35 season (with the exercise option). With everyone else, you are paying them through their 37-38 age seasons.
              Also, I listed 5 teams. Yankees probably don’t have the prospects, but the BoSox have the prospects and have shown a willingness to spend. As far as getting “pretty definite no” from the other 2, when has that happened. They couldn’t work out a trade with the Cubs in a 47 hour window (that’s not a definite no) – and the report that the Phils asked the Dodgers for 3 top prospects was later “turned down” by another report a day and a half later.

              Reply
              • petrie000

                11 years ago

                the stories i’ve heard about the Cubs/phillies negotiations was the Cubs were willing to use Russell and Almora as the centerpieces and the counter was Baez, Soler and Russell minimum. And wouldn’t budge off that.

                Reply
                • Phillyfan425

                  11 years ago

                  I’d love to see that report/story. Because I never heard anything other than Russell – even that was fan-oriented (and most Cubs fans here were vehement that was TOO much!). It’s not that I don’t believe you – just that I heard no rumors about what was actually being exchanged.

                  Reply
              • EB

                11 years ago

                I’d be real surprised if Scherzer or Lester got 7 years. Even 6 is a stretch.

                Reply
                • jeffm

                  11 years ago

                  Front of the rotation arms at 30-31 years old get 6-7 year deals.

                  Reply
                  • EB

                    11 years ago

                    Can you name one? Because I can’t think of a good comparison. Verlander is a good comparison but not a great one because he wasn’t a free agent and Detroit is just being silly with these contracts. CJ Wilson signed a five year deal. Grienke got 6 but the deal started at age 29. As I mentioned, Bailey got 6 but he was 28 at the time. CC got 8 years but he was 28 at the time too.

                    Reply
                • TommyC

                  11 years ago

                  Scherzer has already turned down 6/148 from the Tigers and Lester has turned down a 5 year deal. I’m sure they and their agents are a little better at forecasting the free agent market for elite arms than those of us here.

                  Reply
                  • EB

                    11 years ago

                    Lester was low balled. Scherzer is represented by Boras. Bailey got 6 years (technically a 5 year extension) but it started with his age 28 season. Are there any good contract comparisons? Kershaw is much younger than either.

                    Reply
      • EB

        11 years ago

        I don’t know that controllable years applies to Hamels. His contract now pays him for his free agent years. It’s different (because it is much more expensive) than the arbitration control teams have over players.

        Reply
    • Bob_Laublaw

      11 years ago

      While technically true-you forgot to mention that the haul for those 3 players combined included an outfielder (Cespedes) who made this years all star game and a young but established MLB lefty starter (Smiley) to go along with the two shortstop prospects that changed hands. Had those deals been purely for prospects there obviously would have been quite a few more of them involved

      Reply
      • petrie000

        11 years ago

        okay, fair enough. let’s say Cespedes and Smyly easily count the same as a top prospect each, just for the same of argument. That’s still 4 for 2 pitchers easily of Hamel’s caliber (Lester and Price) and one that’s probably a solid no. 2 (Samardzija, who i was never a huge fan of in Chicago). All of whom combined are probably owed roughly what Hamels is.

        Reply
  11. bagpipes5

    11 years ago

    Guys. Hamels has a 1.72 era in his last 18 starts. He’s right in the top of the mix behind Kershaw. Every bit as good if not better than Lester or Scherzer. The Phillies arent anxious to trade him.

    If you want Cole Hamels at $90 M over the next 4 years it will cost you 3 prospects. If you dont give up the prospects you arent getting one of the games top pitchers. Good luck dealing with the Scherzer and Lester sweepstakes.

    Reply
    • northsfbay

      11 years ago

      The Phillies don’t want to trade their best players. See how many games the Phillies win going with what they have.

      Reply
      • Phillyfan425

        11 years ago

        The Phillies don’t want to trade their best player for less than what other teams are getting in return for similar players. He said they’re not anxious to trade him (meaning they aren’t in the Rays dilemma with Price, and needed to deal him before he cost them $20 M next year).

        Reply
  12. EB

    11 years ago

    It all depends on the meaning of “top prospects.” On its face that certainly sounds reasonable. But are we talking prospects that are near the majors or in the low minors? Are we talking prospects that have All Star ceiling or those that could be solid starters?

    I’m not sure the Phillies are going to find a trade partner willing to give up much top 100 talent. Hamels has a good contract, but it still is a risky one given his position and it’s not a great contract by any means. I suspect the Phillies are going to end up holding onto Hamels much like they did Cliff Lee. Hopefully the result is different.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    The Opener: Phillies, Wade, Perez, Dodgers, Padres

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Blue Jays Notes: Scherzer, Varsho, Francis

    Pirates Reportedly Receiving Interest In Isiah Kiner-Falefa

    Angels Sign Ben Gamel To Minor League Deal

    Blue Jays Recall Spencer Turnbull For Season Debut

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version