The Cubs decided yesterday to place infielder Addison Russell on the 7-day concussion injured list, as Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun-Times reports. By doing so, the organization will avoid paying Russell a $100K roster bonus.
As Wittenmyer explains, this outwardly innocuous move makes for a complicated situation from a variety of perspectives. It’s even possible that it could ultimately lead to a grievance, he suggests, though it’s not clear whether that has specifically been contemplated.
With rosters expanded in September, the use of the injured list changes significantly. The 60-day IL remains relevant because it allows teams to open a 40-man roster spot. But the only real reason to use the 10-day or 7-day concussion lists is to make a recently optioned player eligible for an earlier recall.
In this case, the Cubs have nothing to gain beyond avoiding Russell’s next roster bonus. His arbitration contract includes a $4.3MM salary and $100K bonuses at 30, 60, 90, and 120 days on the active roster (plus $200K for 150, which he cannot meet).
The club issued an explanation centered upon respect for the concussion protocol. But as Wittenmyer explains, that wouldn’t seem to mandate this official roster move. While this brand of penny pinching at the expense of an employee isn’t generally justifiable, this contract was negotiated under unusual circumstances. Russell served the bulk of a 40-game suspension for violating the league’s domestic violence policy at the start of the 2019 campaign.
There isn’t any indication at this point of tension between team and player. But it’s tempting to wonder whether this hints at things to come. Even if Russell returns to action late this year and/or in the postseason, which remains to be seen, the Chicago organization could well be preparing to part ways at season’s end.
The Cubs already made the widely questioned decision to hang onto Russell despite the shameful circumstances of his suspension. He has been a significant part of this year’s team, spending time on optional assignment but also appearing in 76 MLB games. The Cubs control Russell’s rights for two more seasons and likely wouldn’t owe him a huge raise on his existing base salary. But he has not overcome his offensive struggles, turning in a .227/.303/.389 batting line in 229 plate appearances, so it’s amply possible that the club will simply determine that it’s time to move on from a pure baseball perspective.
Rick Wilkins
Time for Russell to get a fresh start somewhere. No trade value. Non-tender candidate for sure. We don’t win the Series in 16 without him, but the relationship has run its course. Baez is the SS for the long haul on the North Side. Hoerner may be the 2B of the future. Time to see what someone else can do. While I don’t think the Cubs will “blow it up”, the winds of change are stirring in the Windy.
sacball
Thank you Addison Russell…your trade directly/indirectly gave the A’s a much better starting SS, a starting pitcher, and a decent back up catcher.
Aaron Sapoznik
White Sox fans thank you for indirectly mentioning their northside neighbors while neglecting to directly call out their own beloved for those same 3 players.
Aaron Sapoznik
All for a disappointing one-year rental who pitched for each of these 3 teams and was directly involved in both trades, no less!
The White Sox were “Shark” bait in this trade.
rayrayner
Were you Shark at the defunct CRM site? You kind of write like that poster.
Anthony Princeton
It isn’t over yet! When Samardzija signed with the Giants the White Sox received a compensatory pick and drafted Zack Burdi who was an elite RP prospect before having TJ surgery. He only pitched a few inning this year but still has a chance to contribute at the MLB level in the next few years. haha
sacball
Shark’s the gift that keeps on giving…
wordonthestreet
Marcus Semien went from White Sox to A’s
wordonthestreet
A’s got Marcus Semien from the White Sox. The Cubs got a world series championship
jdgoat
It’s amazing how that “fleecing” turned into an actual fleecing.
jdgoat
Honestly Chris Bassitt alone is a nice return in hindsight for a one year rental who struggled.
Cubbie75
Yeah this isn’t about penny pinching. Bye Addy.
tycobb016
Miami? Seattle? Detroit?
chitown311
You just hate to see it
Aaron Sapoznik
The Cubs opened up a can of worms by retaining Addison Russell in the first place. This move might open up Pandora’s Box with the MLBPA.
downsr30
They’ve already retained him this far after what he did, and unless they believe he is hopeless in regards to value, outside of marginal savings, there’s no point in cutting him. If you were going to cut him, it should have been a year ago, not now.
mike156
Russell was hit in the face ten days ago, and was reported as being evaluated for symptoms recently. He hasn’t played since the 8th. If this wasn’t September, he clearly would have been put on the concussion list. So, the possible grievance arises from the idea that since it’s September, they can just carry him even though he can’t play? I would think that’s a stretch, regardless of the “real’ motive. I’m not sure why they have an obligation to keep him on the active roster when he can’t contribute (entirely separate from his personal issues)
ScottCFA
Almost 100% certain they’re going to let Addison go. The margin of error on a player’s salary is a lot wider than $100k so penny-pinching is the only rational explanation. I would be concerned, however, about what that telegraphs to other players about how management treats players.
Aaron Sapoznik
Hardly the first time that the Theo Epstein era Cubs have had to deal with a domestic abuser and the resulting fallout. Also not the first time that they will cut bait with such a player. But “hey, hey”, they helped them win a World Series title in 2016 so what else really matters?
whosyourmomma
Epstein operates under “Ends justify the means”. Chapman (domestic), Starlin Castro (rape accusations), Russell (domestic) and Arrieta (Peds) just happened with Cubs. They had hitting coach (Mallee) who was stealing signs with iWatch too. Does anyone honestly think PED usage didn’t happen with BoSox and players like Man Ram, Big Papi, Schilling, Pedro, Varitek, etc?
rayrayner
Casting a wide net with your attributions. Careful, the comments will be off for this post very soon.
jdgoat
Not really disagreeing with you but anyone who accuses Arrieta of being on PED’s is just lazy. There’s no reason to believe that
Cmurphy
Arrieta was drug tested more than most during his incredible stretch. Never had a positive result. The iWatch sign stealing was the Bo Sox, not the Cubs and long after Epstein left.
There are a lot more domestic abuse charged players than Cubs players. I’m glad they’re going after each one. Reyes, Olivera, Familia, Urias, Herrera… many more. Heck Osuna was suspended 75 games and everyone was fawning all over him at the trade deadline last year while he was suspended. And surprise, it wasn’t Theo or the Cubs who pursued him.
tycobb016
CMurphy How do you know Arrieta was tested more than most during that time? He definitely was all over the stuff. Either by way of TUE or illegally. Dont be so naive.
Cmurphy
He outlined how many times he was tested when it kept coming up. Whether or not he was I don’t know but blankety saying he was and implying Epstein knew it and didn’t care is ridiculous.
mike127
@ aaron—“they” helped them win a World Series title in 2016? Who are “they”? There were no charges against Russell in 2016. Every team has something…every team has that “someone”. It’s a cross section of our society. Go back to the 2005 White Sox–their number #2 home run hitter and RBI guy had previous child abuse charges against him. Carl Everett–same guy who later put a gun to his wife’s head—gave up on believing in dinosaurs—that, Carl Everett. Didn’t deter Kenny.
Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA
With all do respect, what do players really gleam from that? He received an opportunity, dependent upon your view; he probably should or should not have received, because of his potential upside. The catch being he’s been a been a below average hitter his entire career, and hasn’t gotten any better so now the Cubs don’t want to pay him.
In all honesty all that should telegraph to a self aware player is, if your going to participate in this disgraceful behavior you better be Uber talented and/or perform or else you aren’t worth the headache or the money. That’s basically what the club said, indirectly, when they tendered him a contract. You are very talented, so we are willing to put up with the backlash until you don’t perform. This isn’t a case where players are having their clocks manipulated with or being low balled and treated disrespectfully.
whosyourmomma
Epstein operates under “Ends justify the means”. Chapman (domestic), Starlin Castro (rape accusations), Russell (domestic) and Arrieta (Peds) just happened with Cubs. They
had the hitting coach (Mallee) who was stealing signs with the iWatch. Does anyone honestly think PED usage didn’t happen with BoSox and players like Man Ram, Big Papi, Schilling, Pedro, Varitek, etc?
mike127
“Just happened with Cubs’?……the Castro allegations were before Theo, Chapman was with the Yankees, Arrieta statement is just a joke and still chuckling at stealing signs.
And to your statement about the Red Sox you can probably add about 500 other majors into that.
rondon
He actually posted that same tripe twice on here. Haters just can’t hide it.
citizen
im confused. MLBTR is saying russell isn’t really injured, but Ohtani, Belances and Trout are?
FrankRoo
It only matters because Russell has bonuses attached to games on active roster. The argument is that he didn’t HAVE to go to the IL and could have accumulated those days on active roster since it’s September. If this happened in August this wouldn’t be news.
citizen
idk, theres probably more to this than what mlb or the cubs are revealing and what whittlemeyer is speculating.. So if hes active maddon could put him in the lineup, but hes injured it gets worse.
tycobb016
Right Citizen. Some writers tend to imply and editorialize. Clubs and MLB also say what they want you to hear. A few years back some guy got shot and killed on the corner by a park. Papers reported that a snowball was thrown at a car and .things escalated to a shooting. But thats not what happened at all. Guys were dealing drugs on the corner and a transaction or debt went south. We couldnt believe they printed that crap in the paper. Believe nothing you hear and half of what you see.
FrankRoo
Obviously they wouldn’t use him in a game.
The only way this makes sense is if the Cubs called up a player who was just sent down. That didn’t happen so the concussion list was just a clerical thing. It was not needed since the entire 40 man is available. There’s only one reason they did this.
P.S. I agree with the Cub’s move since it’s a weird technicality because it happened in September. If this was earlier in the year Russell would have also gotten those days off the active roster anyways.
Cmurphy
Spitballing here but if they put Russell on the concussion list, they can open up the ability to add Hoerner to the playoff roster under a petion that he was in the organization. It would boost their chances of approval if they had both shortstops down. Just a thought.
“If a club wants to add a player who was not on the 40-man roster but was in the organization, it can petition the Commissioner’s Office if that player is replacing someone who has been on the 60-day DL for at least 60 days.”
mike127
Not sure where this is all coming from—-multiple sources made the announcement of Russell being on the concussion list on Sunday, retroactive back to the 12th.
petrieooo
I wonder if Mrs Russell has ever had a concussion. If she has ever gotten one I am sure she didn’t get it from traveling overseas. It most likely was something she obtained domestically.
rayrayner
If you read her account, she was belittled, ignored, cheated on, pushed, tackled, threatened and grabbed by the throat.
I’m guessing it was the last four that got Russell the suspension
Ry.the.Stunner
Russell should thank his lucky stars he even has a salary at all. The Cubs certainly didn’t have to retain him.
csamson11
I believe I read somewhere that a team can add a player to their playoff roster that wasn’t on the 40 man by Sept 1st in the case of an injury. I’m not positive how this works, but could they be using this as a way to add Hoerner in the event they make the playoffs, and they think there’s a chance Baez and/or Rizzo will be able to play? As in they added Russell to the IL to support their claim, since I think you have to appeal to MLB to approve it. I just don’t see why they’d do this over $100k when they didn’t have to tender him to begin with.
skip tracey
I think this photo of him says it all!