Headlines

  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Cubs Face Decision On Kendall Graveman

By Jeff Todd | October 9, 2019 at 11:40am CDT

It was easy to forget since he did not pitch in 2019, but the Cubs inked righty Kendall Graveman to a fairly unique contract last winter. Now, the team will soon face a decision on his future with the organization.

Graveman’s deal promised him $575K for 2019 and included a $3MM club option (sans buyout) for the season to come. The team will soon have to decide whether to exercise that option. While he’s still within the limits of arbitration eligibility, Graveman can’t be kept by that method. MLBTR has learned that his contract includes a provision requiring the club to release him if it does not pick up the option.

The whole reasoning behind the Cubs’ signing of Graveman was to open this possibility. Indications are that his work this year was relatively promising. The 28-year-old former Jays and A’s hurler was never expected to make it back to the majors this year while rehabbing from Tommy John surgery. But he was able to ramp up to the point that he made two minor-league rehab starts, totaling six innings of action. And he performed all of his efforts under the watchful gaze of the Cubs organization, giving them a close look at the progress and (nearly) end results.

In weighing the decision, the Cubs will no doubt be closely considering how best to construct a cost-efficient 2020 rotation. There are several other soon-to-be free-agent candidates for buy-low/bounceback contracts. But those might end up being more expensive. And the players in question haven’t been under a Cubs microscope all year long.

There are some other factors to consider here as well. Graveman’s 2020 contract would include a $2.5MM incentive package. The Cubs would likely gladly pay that if he’s healthy and effective enough to earn it. Plus, the team would still be able to control him via arbitration for the 2021 campaign if all goes well, effectively creating another option year.

It’s arguable that the Cubs would be in decent shape in the rotation if they hang onto Graveman, even without further action beyond some depth moves. A resurgent Yu Darvish would front the staff along with Kyle Hendricks and Jose Quintana, with veteran lefty Jon Lester trying to finish out his contract with a bang. Graveman would be looking to get his career back on an upward trajectory. He had been a sturdy rotation piece for the A’s from 2015-17, turning in 407 frames of 4.11 ERA ball, before running into elbow troubles. There are also some younger options in the Cubs system, not that any appear to be sure things at this point.

Of course, that isn’t exactly an imposing staff to carry into a season in which your team is trying to break a two-year string of disappointment. The Cubbies might well prefer to chase a different arm. Even then, picking up Graveman’s option might be worthwhile. The club could still utilize him as a swingman or even put together a trade to another team that would love to take a shot at him for that rate.

Share 0 Retweet 7 Send via email0

Chicago Cubs Kendall Graveman

Twins To Exercise Club Option Over Nelson Cruz
Main
Finding A Match In A Starling Marte Trade
View Comments (42)
Post a Comment

42 Comments

  1. The Human Toilet

    6 years ago

    For only $3 million, it is a easy choice to pick up the option even if they plan to look at other arms,

    2
    Reply
    • keysox

      6 years ago

      No

      Reply
  2. yaow 2

    6 years ago

    You can never have enough pitching throughout the season.

    If he is looking good, keep him. The season is long and who knows if he’ll be needed to fill in once someone gets injured.

    Reply
  3. GOP Lizards

    6 years ago

    Graveman seems like a perfect fit for Cubs.

    Reply
  4. sherlock_

    6 years ago

    I think they should exercise it. He has a good upside when healthy.

    Reply
  5. CFS77

    6 years ago

    Pass

    Reply
  6. downsr30

    6 years ago

    I’d say negotiate something to void the current contract and offer him an incentive-based contract with like $1 million base salary, and $500k for 100, 125, 150, 175 IP, with another team option for the following year for $5 million.

    Reply
    • Oxford Karma

      6 years ago

      If his contract is 3 million guaranteed, why would agree to that?

      1
      Reply
    • Robertowannabe

      6 years ago

      If they want to void his contract, they have to release him. I get your point but why would the player want to accept a deal far less than he already agreed to and another team option just like the one you are advocating that they do not elect to exercise. Makes no sense for him to say yes to any of that without testing the market first.

      Reply
      • downsr30

        6 years ago

        If he doesn’t think he’d get a better offer elsewhere, that’s why. If he does think he can do better, of course he tests the market.

        Reply
        • Jbigz12

          6 years ago

          That deal absolutely sucks for Graveman. He’d be better off signing a minor league deal anywhere else. 1.75 MM if he pitches 175 innings? That’s abysmal.

          Reply
        • Jbigz12

          6 years ago

          Never mind I didn’t read that correctly. Im sure Graveman will test the waters if the cubs decline. At least 4-5 rebuilding squads that need innings. I’m sure they’d be more than happy to offer him a better incentive package if the Cubs pass.

          Reply
    • wordonthestreet

      6 years ago

      Why would he do that. He could get that low ball offer from many teams

      Reply
  7. theoepsteinhof

    6 years ago

    If I remember correctly, he was excellent in a couple of starts for Iowa in the PCL playoffs. For the low cost, why would you let him walk? Especially after financing his rehab and investing a full year into his recovery. With him, Chatwood, and Mills, that should fill a fifth starters spot. That doesn’t even include Alzolay or an arm to be acquired. No-brainer here!

    3
    Reply
  8. arc89

    6 years ago

    So how about a update on where his injury is coming along. Its been almost a year and a half since TJS.

    Reply
    • Joe Kerr

      6 years ago

      Call me crazy but you could read the article you commented on to figure out the answer to your own inquiry.

      5
      Reply
    • wordonthestreet

      6 years ago

      R u kidding. The article did update it

      Reply
  9. jgoody62

    6 years ago

    Reminds me of Drew Smyly… rehabbed for a year with the cubs then dealt to Texas without ever throwing a pitch… I dont believe he had an option granted, but nonetheless similar

    Reply
    • Oxford Karma

      6 years ago

      Same thought here. If the cubs don’t want the guys the second year, probably should stop doing this type of contract.

      Reply
    • ilikebaseball 2

      6 years ago

      They had to trade Smyly to make the Hamels contract work. Its why he went to Texas specifically. Cubs saved Texas approx 6/7 million that they were responsible for if they didn’t exercise the 20 million option. Once the Cubs did that, Texas assumed Smyly and his contract.

      Reply
  10. GOP Lizards

    6 years ago

    I think the Ricketts’ can dip into their Trump = funds to resign this mediocre pitcher.

    Reply
    • raiders

      6 years ago

      Way to bring politics into a baseball post. Stupid…

      8
      Reply
  11. ChiSoxCity

    6 years ago

    Theo running a MASH unit or what?

    Reply
  12. desertbull

    6 years ago

    Hopefully they give Chatwood and Mills a chance to win the 5th starter.

    I would explore trades for Quintana if it were me.

    2
    Reply
    • keysox

      6 years ago

      Quintana and Chatwood have Yankees written all over them.
      Frazier?

      Reply
      • southpaw2153

        6 years ago

        Lolololol. Yanks don’t want either of those stiffs. But big thanks to Theo for refusing to trade Schwarber for Chapman in 2016 and throwing in Gleyber, instead. Hahahaha. Gonna be another 100 years before the Scrubs win again.

        Reply
        • Android Dawesome

          6 years ago

          Scrubs… how original. Did you write that one inside your Trapper Keeper?

          1
          Reply
        • chitown311

          6 years ago

          To boot, Theo refuses to give up Schwarber in the Quintana deal. Instead he offered Eloy, who, in his rookie season and missing 25% due to a hammy, managed to hit 31 HRs. In the immortal words of Jason Benetti….Thanks Cubs!

          1
          Reply
        • megaj

          6 years ago

          Moronic comment. Schwarber is way better than Jimenez ever will be, I bet you thumbs up your own comments.

          1
          Reply
        • Cubguy13

          6 years ago

          I’m pretty sure the Yankees wanted Schwarber for Miller and the cubs declined

          Reply
  13. Asfan0780

    6 years ago

    I watched him pitch, wasnt a fan at all. Good stuff for a stretch of games then completely implodes and always has an annual DL trip. Hes just a reminder of that terrible donaldson trade

    Reply
  14. User 163535993

    6 years ago

    This is a no brainer. Pick it up, pick up Quintana’s option and deal him for some bullpen help and go with Lester, Darvish, Hendricks, and Graverman, Chatwood and maybe a minor league arm steps up. Or deal Chatwood if you can find a match, for his 12 million dollar last year deal. Even with the incentives if it’s 6 million he’s half the cost of Quintana who’s .500 at best.

    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      6 years ago

      Cubs should consider moving Quantana to Houston for someone like Armenteros or C. Perez and perhaps a low level prospect.

      Reply
  15. Banesays

    6 years ago

    Ha.

    Reply
    • petrieooo

      6 years ago

      Wow Bane! Hope you didn’t hurt yourself coming up with that one.

      Reply
  16. Fred K. Burke

    6 years ago

    No disrespect to Mr. Jeff Todd but an article about Kendall Graveman? Really? C’mon man. Keep him-Let him walk.It makes no difference. Graveman has no impact at all. The Cubs’ organization have more significant issues to concern themselves with and the MLBTraderumors site should have something more interesting to write about.

    1
    Reply
    • wordonthestreet

      6 years ago

      I was interested in the article

      2
      Reply
    • chitown311

      6 years ago

      Doesn’t matter what your feelings are about the article, the option still exists. A debatable topic but still one of importance considering the Ricketts’ “we have no money” claims

      3
      Reply
  17. southpaw2153

    6 years ago

    This guy was a scrub when he was healthy. Easiest decision ever. Release him. And there are people on this site telling me MLB isn’t watered down. Lolol

    Reply
  18. garpaxmustgo

    6 years ago

    Pick up his option…get rid of Quintana.

    1
    Reply
  19. SoIllCubs

    6 years ago

    This may seem like a silly question. If the Cubs knew going into 2019 that Graveman would likely not pitch in 2019, then didn’t they go into the signing planning on bringing him back in 2020. That’s not to say that I feel as if he is worth the investment, but it seems as if the Cubs have already made it and he didn’t do anything this year health or performance wise to change how they would have felt about him last off season.

    Reply
  20. megaj

    6 years ago

    Why is the writer assuming the Cubs will pick up Jose Quintana’s option? Better to roll the dice with Graveman that has a pretty good upside rather than pay 11M for below average performance from Quintana. That would be stupid. Lester not retiring after the season ended really hurt the Cubs as well. The guy has absolutely nothing left and isn’t close to being an effective MLB pitcher anymore. I guess he just wants his last paycheck? Ideally, they pick up either Cole or Bumgarner in FA to go with Darvish, Hendricks, and Lester. Most likely it will be Bumgarner as he will be cheaper and a good fit to fill a similar role that Cole Hamels did. Graveman or Chatwood can be alternated as the 5th starter or long relief. That is not good enough for the postseason though. If the Cubs are serious about getting back to the playoffs, they are going to have to pick up another strong pitcher via trading Bryant. Even though the Mets say they aren’t dealing, they would definitely trade Syndergaard and a top prospect for Bryant.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Blue Jays Notes: Scherzer, Varsho, Francis

    Pirates Reportedly Receiving Interest In Isiah Kiner-Falefa

    Angels Sign Ben Gamel To Minor League Deal

    Blue Jays Recall Spencer Turnbull For Season Debut

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version