The Red Sox’ offseason addition of right-hander Garrett Richards to their rotation didn’t pan out quite like chief baseball officer Chaim Bloom, general manager Brian O’Halloran and the rest of the Boston front office hoped. Richards got out to a solid start, pitching to a 3.75 ERA through his first 11 trips with a 20.2 percent strikeout rate, an 11.6 percent walk rate and a 48.9 percent ground-ball rate. Richards wasn’t exactly dominant, but for a pitcher who’d signed a one-year, $10MM contract with a club option, the results to that point were a bargain.
Things spiraled downhill rapidly for Richards from that point forth, however. Over his next 11 starts, from June 6 through Aug. 8, Richards was clobbered for a 6.97 ERA. He went from averaging just over 5 1/3 innings per start to 4 1/3 frames, and his strikeout rate plummeted to just 14.3 percent.
This isn’t intended to serve as some form of exposé on pitchers utilizing foreign substances, but it’s important context to note that Richards, a traditionally high-spin-rate pitcher, saw his decline coincide with the league’s memo on the forthcoming foreign-substance crackdown. Richards didn’t shy away from acknowledging that he’d used foreign substances, though he insisted to Jen McCaffrey of The Athletic that he’d only ever used a combination of sunscreen and rosin. (Both McCaffrey’s June 24 and June 30 interviews with Richards are well worth a full read for context.)
“(I’m) going through a little transition period right now,” Richards told McCaffery in late June. “Changing some grips on some of my pitches, learning new pitches, just trying to figure this whole thing out.”
That “transition” period didn’t exactly pay dividends for Richards, as evidenced by the previously referenced plummet in his results. The Red Sox gave him some runway to try to sort things out, but on Aug. 11, they pulled him from the rotation and plugged him into the bullpen. So far, it’s proven to be a game-changer for both the Sox and for Richards himself.
Since moving into a short-relief role, Richards has dominated. He’s tossed 20 2/3 innings of relief, pitching to a 0.87 ERA with a 29.4 percent strikeout rate, a 9.4 percent walk rate and a 48.1 percent ground-ball rate. Richards’ fastball averaged 94.2 mph out of the rotation, and that’s jumped to 95.0 mph in the ’pen — 95.3 mph since Sept. 1.
Richards has also seen gains in swinging-strike rate (from 9.4 percent to 10.8 percent), opponents’ chase rate (27.9 percent to 34.5 percent), opponents’ average exit velocity (91.6 mph to 89.4 mph) and an overwhelming drop in his opponents’ barrel rate — from 9.3 percent all the way down to 1.9 percent. Since moving to a relief role, he’s allowed just one “barreled” ball, as measured by Statcast, and he has yet to surrender a home run.
It’s true that we’re only looking at a sample of 20 2/3 frames right now, but Richards’ dominance is going to give the Red Sox a decision that as recently as early August looked to be a foregone conclusion. The 33-year-old’s one-year, $10MM contract carries a $10MM club option for the 2022 season, which comes with a $1.5MM buyout. The Red Sox will effectively have to make a net $8.5MM decision on him for the 2022 season, and while that looked like an easy option to buy out when he was floundering in the rotation, the price tag suddenly looks much more palatable.
Some may raise an eyebrow at the notion of doling out an extra $8.5MM based on a few weeks of work in the bullpen, but there’s pretty recent precedent of a reliever being paid at that level following a similar late shift to the ’pen. When the Brewers acquired Drew Pomeranz from the Giants in 2019, they did so by somewhat surprisingly sending a fairly well regarded prospect to San Francisco in return: Mauricio Dubon. Pomeranz had made just four relief appearances when the Brewers took that plunge.
It proved to be a terrific decision for Milwaukee, as Pomeranz worked to a 2.39 ERA with an overwhelming 45 percent strikeout rate in 26 1/3 innings down the stretch. He rode that wave of momentum into free agency, where he cashed in on a four-year, $34MM contract with the Padres.
Pomeranz was excellent through his first 44 1/3 innings of that contract before undergoing season-ending surgery, but the results of his contract aren’t really consequential with regard to Richards. The mere fact that Pomeranz was able to command a four-year deal in the first place certainly suggests that the market could bear a nice multi-year guarantee for Richards, assuming he sustains this pace for the season’s final couple of weeks. Richards hasn’t quite as dominant in terms of missing bats and limiting walks, and it’s critical to point out that he’s two years older now than Pomeranz was when he hit free agency. Still, even if a four-year pact isn’t on the table, a two- or three-year contract could be feasible.
The Sox have just shy of $104MM in guarantees on the books for next season. They’ll have to make decisions on club options for catcher Christian Vazquez ($7MM) and left-hander Martin Perez ($6MM). Boston also owes $16MM to the Dodgers under the David Price trade. Even with those additional financial considerations, this is a former luxury-tax payor who came close to paying the tax in 2021. Payrolls in the $200MM range aren’t out of the norm in Boston. A net $8.5MM decision on a reliever who has looked largely unhittable late since moving out of the rotation is something they can afford if they’re sold on Richards’ renaissance in the bullpen.
If the Sox ultimately decide to buy Richards out and pursue other bullpen options, that could work out even better for the right-hander. He’d suddenly be one of the more interesting options in a free-agent class of relievers that doesn’t feature many high-end names. Whatever path the Sox choose, the decision to move Richards out of the rotation looks like a good one for all parties at this point.
Judge Judy
Gag me with a spoon.
Fever Pitch Guy
Grody to Mad Max.
Okay I know this will probably be a controversial opinion, but I think it’s time to move on from Vazquez.
He’s never been a favorite of the pitchers.
His Catcher ERA hasn’t been good for years (hence Sandy was the preferred catcher even though he couldn’t hit)
They held onto Vazquez because of his bat, but his hitting took a massive drop this season
And his glittery belt annoys the heck out of his teammates
I say cut him loose and sign somebody like Pina.
JoeBrady
Nope. I’m not in love with the guy either, but he is worth $7M pretty easily. With one year left, he might be motivated to come in in better shape, which I think affects his ability to turn on the ball. But even if he doesn’t, I see no compelling reason to switch. Catching can get expensive quickly.
Fever Pitch Guy
Vazquez is already the 10th-highest paid catcher in MLB.
Is he a top-ten catcher? I just don’t see it.
Bruin1012
Has everyone looked at the free agent catchers not a real good list probably stuck with Vasquez for another year.
Fever Pitch Guy
I think the Sox will have to go cheap on catcher, because they’ll need to budget a large amount of payroll for hopefully extending Devers, Xander, Schwarber, and either signing or replacing ERod.
Except for the few elite hitting catchers, it’s not a position that requires much money to fill. Plenty of good defensive catchers out there.
Bruin1012
There really isn’t that many good defensive catchers available next year. I would be very happy with Zunino if the Rays don’t pickup his option otherwise I think it would be wise to pickup Vasquez’s option.
goobar1212
This does not include a terrible outing where he gave a five unearned runs and got hit all over the ballpark
rct
In that outing, Richards got a lineout, then gave up a walk, then induced an inning-ending double play that the shortstop booted. After that, he gave up two hits and a walk with four unearned runs and then the next reliever gave up a hit to allow another unearned run to score.
In other words, not really a terrible outing as he should have been out of it with just a walk and three batters faced. His teammates (shortstop error and the next reliever giving up a hit) did him no favors.
JoeBrady
goobar1212
This does not include a terrible outing where he gave a five unearned runs
==============================
That’s why, for a small sample size, it is better to go with OPSa and K/W. Too much variance on the other stats.
In this case, I’d focus on K/W. His OPSa is .542 in relief, but just a couple of shots that go 10 feet further might wreck that. OTOH, his K/W of 25/8, in 20.2 IPs, is pretty good. He also has the capability of going 2+ innings, and either by design or pure luck, this is what the RS are producing right now, with good results.
So I’d be interested, but not at his current pricetag. Maybe $10M/2 or thereabouts? He is also 33, and I wouldn’t ignore that.
richt
When I saw this title I didn’t think it was going to be related to his contract prospects, sounds like a Fangraphs piece
HalosHeavenJJ
Nice write up. He’d flown under my radar as a guy using the sticky icky.
$8.5 million for a solid reliever isn’t that bad, especially if he can give you multiple innings every now and then. I wouldn’t be surprised if Boston kept him.
KD17
HalosHeavenJJ – $8.5 for a solid reliever isn’t bad? I agree if he’s the closer. The Yankees haven’t won a ring in over a decade because they paid 5 guys money like you are suggesting or more but didn’t invest in starters. Should Boston move in that direction?
On a normal team there is usually a bullpen structure that includes 1 closer, 4 short set up men and two more long relievers. Can you suggest how much should be paid for each one? I’m curious since you said $8.5M for a solid reliever isn’t that bad.
Ottavino cost $8.15M in 2021. Who would you rather have? E-Rod cost $8.3M. Who would you rather have? Taylor and Hernandez cost less than a million each. Benintendi was traded because he cost $6.6M! Is a starting left fielder more important than a bullpen piece?
I have often wondered where the money should go when it comes to building a roster. Cashman in NY puts it into bullpen pieces. DD is a SP investor. What do you think?
ShootyBabbit
Always liked him on the Angels, he hasn’t prospered like I thought he would
CubsWin108
Buy-out, he gets 1.5 Million, then give him 2/12 Mililion, seems fair to me.
BeforeMcCourt
Pomeranz got 4 years and you think you’ll get Richards at 1/2 the deal and about half his current salary?
Fair to you? More like a rip off for him
1984wasntamanual
Didn’t most people consider that Pomeranz contract to be an overpay at the time? He was also younger.
CubsWin108
Red sox get more financial flexibility, he gets more money total then the option and gets financial security
carl4sox
I hope he continues his bullpen brilliance. I like him – he seems a gamer. And he was honest about the effects of the no foreign substance ban on his game.
If he keeps it up, definitely give him an extension.
Texas Outlaw
They could pick it up and add four mill and a year on. They its basically a 2/14 deal. Win for both sides.
runningred
He will look great in a Mets uniform!!!! Best of luck GR!
aragon
many pitchers seem to be using again. and managers are not asking umpires to check on a pitcher since theirs are using, too.
Fever Pitch Guy
All pitchers are constantly checked by an umpire after leaving the mound, their hat & glove & belt.
KD17
Garrett RIchards is being over-hyped in this article. Remember Pearce and how Cora batted him 3rd in the line-up and he had a good month so the team paid more than they should have for a journeyman player? Richards is injury prone which is something every team should try to avoid and that should impact his value. Richards hasn’t been good since 2015 because he has not thrown over 76.1 IP until 2021 and this year was a disaster until a month ago or less.
Between the health concerns and the sustained poor performance I believe it would be a bad investment to sign him gong forward and I believe other teams will feel the same way during the off-season despite Steve Adams endorsement. Fool me once with Pearce shame on you, fool me twice with Richards shame on the Red Sox. Too many red flags and too many cheaper and better alternatives. There are no guarantees after this magical season that Richards will ever perform like he has in September.
Angels & NL West
The Angels could use a RP or two. And, as I recall, Richards and Trout are best buds, as are their wives. Perhaps a reunion?
Rsox
If the Red Sox exercise Richards’ option it would be with the intention of him competing for a rotation spot. I can’t see Bloom paying him $7 million to come out of the bullpen. Sale/Eovaldi/Pivetta/Houck are the projected starters for next season with one spot up for grabs. If the don’t keep ERod than let Richards come to training camp as a starter as he’s probably better than many of the buy low options Bloom would consider.
Absolutely let Martin Perez go though. While the bullpen has helped Richards figure some things out it’s done nothing for Perez
Fever Pitch Guy
Yeah I’ve had my fill of Perez.
He served his purpose when the Sox weren’t expected to be contenders last year, a low cost option who filled out the rotation while usually staying healthy.
Going forward, Perez serves no purpose on a contender.
JoeBrady
He wasn’t bad. As a starter, he went 7-8, and the team record was 12-10 in his starts. He had a 4.77 ERA against a league average.of 4.47. When you get that out of your #4 or #5 types, that’s not bad.
It would be nice if we could start developing a few low-end guys at minimum wage from our own farm, but Perez is likely worth the option cost.
Bruin1012
Interesting offseason for Bloom he has a lot of decisions to make.
I am hoping they stretch Whitlock out next year and he goes into the rotation. I can also Seabold potentially at the back of the rotation next year or the very least quality depth. The real question is do they bring Eddie back? I guess it just depends on his cost. This should be an interesting offseason for Bloom.
GaryWarriorsRedSox
Solid no on Eduardo Rodriguez for me. I’m tired of it, he’s only been good 2 out of the six years he’s been with us. Done with him.
JoeBrady
I’d like to see if we can follow this year’s formula and turn Seabold into a 2-inning shutdown RP, while turning Houck & Whitlock into an SP.
But fair warning, I am still not sure either will be successful as a starter. Houck hasn’t been tried much 3x thru the lineup, and 6 innings for Whitlock is a lot different than his usual 2 innings.
That said, two mediocre SPs like Richards & Perez can be fairly productive when followed up with a 2-inning specialist.
JoeBrady
GaryWarriorsRedSox
Solid no on Eduardo Rodriguez for me.
============================
I’d be okay with ERod, but a lot depends on whether his asking price looks more like his ERA of 5.00, or more like his FIP of 3.46. I’m sure his agent will be asking for FIP money, but hopefully we can find something in-between.
I don’t like much of this class of free agents.
KD17
Bruin1012 – Do you see Sale, Eovaldi, Houck and Pivetta as starters? Seabold and Whitlock makes six. E-Rod makes seven. Which five do you want? Or should they invest in six or seven?
KD17
Gary – What an intelligent and thoughtful comment!! Sorry could pass on the opportunity!! BTW I agree. Too expensive for his performance over the last 5 years. I still think a #2 SP is needed or at least a #3 SP to sit behind Sale and Eovaldi. Houck just needs a complete season to prove he’s a top end SP for the future. Pivetta also has a decent upside if he can maintain his control. His stuff is good.
Ownership will have the biggest gap between the cap and the payroll that it’s had in a very long time in 2022 so a #2 SP is affordable if they open the purse strings. What would you do with the 3 DHs?
philsandsox2009
I agree. He nibbles too much, ala Dice K and Clay B. It’s brutal to watch. I’m sure he will command 15-18 mill a year and that’s a hard no for me.
Fever Pitch Guy
Bottom line is Perez has a 5.06 ERA from 2017-2021. His numbers over those past 5 years are far worse than his numbers over the first 5 years of his career. He is not going to get better. He will likely continue to get worse.
The Red Sox already have committed quite a bit of payroll to the bullpen, there’s better and cheaper reliever options than Perez.
I’d rather have any combination of Pivetta/Houck/Seabold/Whitlock as our #4 or #5 starters than Perez. All four of those guys can become much better, Perez cannot.
Bruin1012
KD I see Sale, Eovaldi, Houck, Pivetta, and Whitlock as starters next year. I would like to see Bloom target at minimum 2 free agent starters. I’m thinking that Seabold will be depth to start the year. It is important to have depth in starting pitching I would say at least 8 deep. Depending on the free agent starters signed that could sway my opinion on whether to stretch Whitlock out as a starter next year.
JoeBrady
I think my current assessment of the RS rotation has been irreparably altered by how good Whitlock has been out of the BP. Houck as a much smaller sample size, but it could be the same thing. 2-inning shutdown RPs are like nuggets of gold.
FWIW, I recall a time when this was the standard procedure for bringing up prospects. You’d have them pitching 2-3 innings out of the BP, before graduating to a starter in their 2nd year.
Fever Pitch Guy
Joe, how far back are you talking?
30 years ago there was a local guy named Kevin Morton who made his ML debut with a CG 1 ER 1 BB 9 K performance.
15 of his 16 appearances that year were as a starter.
Going back farther, Bob Ojeda’s first two years (17 appearances) were all as a starter in 1980-1981.
Fever Pitch Guy
I think the price for ERod is going to be high. He didn’t pitch last year and went through a lot physically, so it wasn’t a surprise the first half of this season didn’t go well for him. But as others have pointed out, he’s been much better since the start of August.
If teams think ERod will revert back to his 3.81 ERA days in 2018 & 2019, they will view him as a #2 or #3 starter and will offer to pay him accordingly.
JoeBrady
Fever Pitch Guy
Joe, how far back are you talking?
====================================
Probably longer than that. Koosman started with 3 GS and 6 Relief appearances. Ryna with an assortment for about 3 years. Cuellar, McNally, Palmer. There are bunch of others.
Fever Pitch Guy
Okay gotcha. I can see how that would take pressure off the rookies, allow them to get their feet wet in lower leverage situations. As for Whitlock, I wouldn’t mind seeing him in the starting rotation.
I just don’t see guys like Richards doing the middle innings reliever role. Middle relievers have traditionally been the lowest paid guys on the pitching staff. If I’m Richards, I’d want to go back to starting. I’m sure his agent feels the same way.
KD17
Bruin1012 – Just back tracked and saw your response. I did a preliminary look at the FA class of SPs and my top choices are:
John Means or Carlos Rodon.
Means will be 29 in 2022 and has pitched well in the minors but his hits per 9 were always too high but his walks per 9 have been excellent. In 2019 he finally broke through and reduced his hits per 9 to 8 so his WHIP was excellent. In 2021 he further dropped his hits per 9 to 7.2 with 1.7 walks per 9. Those are SP#2 numbers plus he’s a lefty so Eovaldi could squeeze in between him and Sale with Houck and Pivetta behind him.
Rodon is the flip version of Means. His walks per 9 were too high and he has brought them down from 4.4 to 2.4 to go along with his hits per 9 at 6.3 down from his usual 8.6.
This one add with the others you mentioned would give the SP staff credibility and comparability to other excellent staffs. I would hold off on converting Whitlock to a starter. If they don’t get a true closer then maybe I’d try him at closer but if they got a true closer he’s the perfect guy to be used like Hader was originally used. The high stress innings guy. Stop the damage before it gets to great guy.
David C
Rsox – I completely agree. It would be out of character for Bloom to give that kind of money up for a set up guy (which is presumably what Richards is going forward in the long term). I was even shocked that he signed Barnes to that two year extension recently given the AAV. But, then again, Bloom isn’t constrained by small market team financial limitations, so who knows?
padreforlife
Only Preller dumb enough to give Pomeranz 34 mil
NGC
Glad to see Richards finding some success again. I watched him absolutely dominate in his early years with the Angels until that nasty injury in Boston. He was never the same after that. He’s always had electric stuff just couldn’t find the strike zone consistently. As a back of the bullpen piece I’m willing to bet the Angels would take a chance on him if the Sox don’t bring him back.
GaryWarriorsRedSox
Eckersley 2.0?
KD17
Gary – Hard to compare him to a guy who had five great seasons as a starter then went on to be an elite closer at age 32. Richards is 34 in 2022 and really never had one great season like Eck’s five. No awards, no All-Star teams, no Cy Young votes and no vote mention in the MVP voting. Eck had all those accolades before he went from starting to closing. So, maybe best case he is Eck lite or Eck lite lite..
Horace Fury
Bloom isn’t going to exercise the club option for that price–the Barnes extension killed that kind of money for another reliever. And the article doesn’t mention that Richards has said he considers himself a starter and probably won’t be seeking a relief job until absolutely necessary. I’m sure that, once he has gotten past the screaming emergency his year turned into after the substance ban, Richards and his representation will start the off-season by seeking opportunities in a starting rotation. I doubt the Sox will be offering. At the moment, Hansel Robles is looking like a possibility for set-up/back of the pen next year–there will have to be others, of course–all much cheaper than $10MM/yr which was intended to be starter money.
Rsox
Seabold needs to find some out pitches, he got lucky twice on getting Abreu to hit into double plays but that kind of luck doesn’t last.
I’m kind of on the fence about making Whitlock a starter. He has been so clutch in relief that it seems like he could be a 9th inning option sooner than later. Remember they tried stretching Papelbon out to be a starter in spring training 2007 and he asked to go back to the bullpen and that turned out great. They stretched out Daniel Bard and that was a disaster that took Bard years to recover from
whyhayzee
Funny that they mention Pomeranz. It was the Red Sox who put him in the bullpen. They’ve had a lot of success with that. Perez seems to be acclimating a little more slowly than Richards. Just come in and fire strikes. Perez can hit 95 and he has secondary pitches. No reason he can’t succeed in the bullpen. This all boils down to a dozen or so games. Sale and Houck effectively replaced Perez and Richards. All hands on deck now, bullpen has to do well.
GaryWarriorsRedSox
Yes you’re right, and isn’t that why the Giants signed him? To be a good arm in the pen?
Jean Matrac
No, The Giants signed him to be a starter. He had 17 starts before they moved him to the ‘pen, because that 6.10 ERA wasn’t cutting it.
GaryWarriorsRedSox
Okay gotcha. That’s not what I remember hearing or reading. But you’re probably a Giants fan and would know about it more than I would. Thanks.
Fever Pitch Guy
As of right now, Richards is the 5th-highest paid player on the team and Ottavino is the 7th-highest.
Altogether, their bullpen right now is at $30M. And next year Barnes’ salary will double to $9.5M.
Sorry but if the Sox go into next season with $35M allocated to just the bullpen, that doesn’t leave much left for the 17 other guys on the team.
Jean Matrac
SPs have more value than relievers, and Pomeranz’s stuff seemed like he could be a starter. The Sox put him in the ‘pen, because he was sucking as a starter, 6.31 ERA. He kind of sucked as a reliever for the Sox as well. He was only marginally better as a reliever, 5.56 ERA.
The Giants also tried him as a SP, and he wasn’t good then either, 6.10 ERA, They also moved him to the ‘pen before trading him to the Brewers. He was very good coming out of the Giants ‘pen, although it’s a small sample, 0.00 ERA over 5.1 IPs.
I was surprised that Pomeranz got the contract he did from the Padres. Not so much the dollars, but the length is what surprised me.
BeforeMcCourt
Even if they don’t want to pay him 8.5M, he’s a trade asset at that cost
David C
A trade asset at that cost?