Headlines

  • Red Sox Place Hunter Dobbins On 15-Day IL Due To ACL Tear
  • Astros Promote Brice Matthews
  • Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow
  • Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers
  • Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help
  • Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Details On The Athletics’ Revenue-Sharing Status

By Mark Polishuk | March 12, 2022 at 10:58pm CDT

Reports surfaced in February that the new collective bargaining agreement would see the Athletics once again become a recipient of revenue-sharing funds, and indeed, that proved to be the case once the CBA was (at long last) finalized between the league and the MLB Players Association.  Susan Slusser and Matt Kawahara of The San Francisco Chronicle reported on the details of the Oakland revenue-sharing situation on Thursday, and The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal had some more specifics in his recent notes column.

For one, it will take four years (of the five-year span of the collective bargaining agreement) for the A’s to receive a full share of revenue-sharing monies, as Rosenthal notes that the team will be phased in via 25 percent increments.  For instance, Oakland will get 25 percent of a full share in the first year, 50 percent in the second year, etc.

It is also possible that the A’s won’t even get to that full share unless they make significant progress on their long-desired new ballpark.  As per the terms of the CBA, if the Athletics don’t have “a binding deal” for a new ballpark in place by January 15, 2024, they will no longer receive any revenue-sharing funds.  If an agreement for a new stadium has been arranged by this date, the A’s will retain their revenue-sharing recipient status until they move into that ballpark.

Of particular note to Bay Area fans, the agreement specifies that the 1/15/24 deadline applies to a new deal for a ballpark in any city, not just Oakland.  The A’s have been exploring the possibility of a move to Las Vegas, and yet most recently, it seems there has been renewed momentum to a stadium in Oakland at the Howard Terminal site.  Back in May, the league publicly supported the Athletics’ plans to look outside of their home city for potential new stadium sites, so it makes sense that the CBA wouldn’t put any limit on where the A’s might direct their search over the next 22 months.  The club’s lease at the RingCentral Coliseum is up following the 2024 season.

Share 0 Retweet 2 Send via email0

Collective Bargaining Agreement Oakland Athletics

Phillies Interested In Matt Chapman
Main
Minor MLB Transactions: 3/12/22
View Comments (43)
Post a Comment

43 Comments

  1. Samuel

    3 years ago

    Difficult to depend on politicians to carry through on agreements. Ask Mark Davis what the Oakland City Council did to him and his father.

    IMO the A’s situation in Oakland has been going on for far too long.

    3
    Reply
    • OaktownMook

      3 years ago

      They didn’t do anything to Mark Davis. Dude wanted someone to build him a stadium and he never truly tried to get anything done in the bay area. The A’s will get the binding vote in April to build at Howard Terminal in Oakland

      8
      Reply
      • Samuel

        3 years ago

        “They didn’t do anything to Mark Davis. Dude wanted someone to build him a stadium…”

        Las Vegas did……

        and they’ll do that for the A’s.

        Reply
    • ABStract

      3 years ago

      While I agree that it has been going on for too long, I’m sincerely confused by you’re sympathy for the Davis family. I’ve actually never heard anyone propose anything close to a need for it, and I know a lot of Oakland fans.
      Have you heard of “Mount Davis”? Check out pics of what that place looked like before the Raiders made their changes. I grew up loving that park.
      The Davis’s are the reason that stadium was turned from a beautiful baseball only venue, into the the literal toilet it is now.
      I hope the A’s get their new park, but I can’t share your sympathy for the Davis family, and absolutely none for the A’s owners.

      7
      Reply
      • ABStract

        3 years ago

        *your
        Damn it

        Reply
    • 58edsil

      3 years ago

      Oakland and the County bent over backwards with AL. AL fleeced the Public and never seriously tried to build here. They needed that 750 million from LV

      Reply
  2. Yankee Clipper

    3 years ago

    Ohhhh, that must be why they’re big spenders this year in FA & extensions – the first 25% of the money coming in from the revenue shares! Makes sense now, mhm, m’kay.

    Of course giving the A’s money is tied to the A’s getting a new ballpark though. Public pays for stadium, teams pay the A’s – yeah, right on! Goooo MLB, n’ stuff.

    8
    Reply
    • 58edsil

      3 years ago

      Guess you aren’t keen at looking up the ballpark proposal. Public will front some infrastructure, along with increased new property taxes AND the stadium is privately financed. This is a huge project that will bring many benefits to the area

      Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        3 years ago

        You missed the $855M in public funds they requested for the area outside the stadium, but whatever you want to believe, man, whatever helps you sleep at night. “Some infrastructure” is one way to put it….

        Reply
  3. ldoggnation

    3 years ago

    It’s time for the Las Vegas Athletics. Get the hell out of CA. Thousands of other fleeing businesses can’t be wrong.

    12
    Reply
    • agentx

      3 years ago

      Thousands of other businesses can be wrong, depending your perspective (e.g., one of the scores of employees in good standing often told to either uproot themselves and their families for another state or be “laid off” aka fired so management and investors can get a price-per-share or company valuation bump).

      6
      Reply
    • ABStract

      3 years ago

      California will be fine without your support.
      Although I’d love to see your proof of “thousands of fleeing businesses”, hahaha, what!? Come on guy! Reality, try it.

      6
      Reply
      • mfm4200

        3 years ago

        these folks can’t really name them, and besides, the main people leaving are liberals anyways, not enough of them to affect cali voting, but enough of them to affect other states (hence why horseface and her goof troop pals are whining about these people being banned from voting for a few years. if it was cons moving like they claim, the squad and company wouldn’t be whining about voters).

        Reply
        • Dock_Elvis

          3 years ago

          My home area of KS is DELUGED with conservative California ex-pats. A couple of years ago DFW saw an influx of 150,000 California’s in a single year. Liberals go to the NW, not so much Texas outside of Austin.

          1
          Reply
    • Steinbrenner2728

      3 years ago

      Besides the Oakland A’s…. The San Francisco Giants, the Los Angeles Dodgers, the Los Angeles Angels (of Anaheim), and the San Diego Padres all seem to be doing well off while doing business in CA, “ldoggnation”. Like it or not, the A’s are staying. The league pretty much started these Las Vegas rumors of course, but the team would be absolutely out of their minds to go from staying in the 5th overall largest TV market in the league to the smallest.

      4
      Reply
    • 66TheNumberOfTheBest

      3 years ago

      CA, by itself, is the fifth largest economy in the world.

      Learn to not get confused by anecdotes.

      Even loud ones.

      1
      Reply
  4. someoldguy

    3 years ago

    yes More economic blackmail… instead of the 30 Billionaires who own the MLB and their massive wealth funding new stadiums.. they will once again bilk the public with their lies of economic development.. and blackmail them with the “if you don’t subsidize us we’ll take your team away… ” please read all about it.. econreview.berkeley.edu/the-economics-of-sports-st…

    12
    Reply
    • crise

      3 years ago

      Totally agree, but the thing is it pretty much usually works for them. Part of what makes them rich is finding ways to get their hands on other people’s money, and they’ll continue to play this card until it fails. At this point they’re mostly just hoping that the Oakland burghers don’t read the Atlanta papers for news on how these deals can turn out.

      1
      Reply
      • OaktownMook

        3 years ago

        Except the A’s only asked for funding for off-site infrastructure for Howard Terminal.

        1
        Reply
        • agentx

          3 years ago

          True, though the off=site infrastructure funding that the A’s have requested will total approximately $855MM.

          2
          Reply
        • Yankee Clipper

          3 years ago

          $855M? That’s it? Why you guys crying about that? Dang, man. Not like it’s your money. Well, come to think of it, now that I wrote this out loud, it actually would be your money – carry on.

          4
          Reply
  5. dave frost nhlpa

    3 years ago

    The coliseum is an absolute dump.
    I’ve heard from fellow agents the following cities.
    Las Vegas
    Nashville
    Vancouver (dome)
    Albuquerque
    Montreal

    Good luck to all who move forward with the project.

    1
    Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      3 years ago

      Nashville!!! But they would need a new name. Trash Pandas is still one of my faves for TN.

      3
      Reply
    • You Can Put It In The Books

      3 years ago

      Vegas would be neat.

      Reply
    • astros_fan_84

      3 years ago

      I don’t see how ABQ could support an MLB team. I think Austin is viable.

      Reply
      • kje76

        3 years ago

        Austin would be a viable market, but I can’t see the Astros and Rangers allowing another team in Texas, especially what would be a THIRD AL West team.

        1
        Reply
  6. Redstitch108* 2

    3 years ago

    How about the MLB lift the stranglegold the Giants have on Silicon Valley. Let the A’s move to San Jose, a much more viable home than Oakland, a mere 30 miles down the road from Oakland and yet more than 50 miles from San Francisco. Why does nobody address this injustice?

    2
    Reply
    • jekporkins

      3 years ago

      It’s a beyond-exhausted argument.

      It will never happen so to continue to bring it up does zero good. That’s exactly why the A’s have been pushing Oakland to do something for the last 20 years and sniffing around Las Vegas.

      Yeah, the stadium is the pits, but it’s been the pits for over 25 years and it’s the same thing over and over again. I’ve said it on this site multiple times – Oakland will never build them a stadium.

      On another note – The A’s owners are the worst. They suck revenue from the other teams instead of investing in their own team, cry poor, and do nothing for the fans. John Fisher is worth almost $3 billion.

      10
      Reply
      • ABStract

        3 years ago

        Seriously, it’s your owner that’s killing that team!
        Blaming it on others isn’t gonna help you.

        1
        Reply
      • Samuel

        3 years ago

        How much money an owner in any business is worth is irrelevant.

        Plenty of MLB fans living in the Oakland area have assets – particularly in home equity. Why don’t you ask them to liquidate some assets or take a loan out to buy tickets? That’s what you’re asking the owner to do to cover loses. Last year the A’s were competitive and wound up second to last in attendance – and they’ve been in the bottom 3 in attendance for over 10 years. The combined wealth of those people is many times greater than that of the A’s owner.

        I read a couple of books on the Charlie Finley years. Charlie had major problems each year drawing fans to see the A’s. That area has never supported the A’s other than the championship years. That’s a fact. The Giants own the hearts of Bay Area fans.

        As for building them a new park in Oakland to cure all the problems……I heard the same thing about a new park in Miami. The Marlins got it and the fans still don’t come. A bad market is a bad market. The owner of the Rays says that 2 markets sharing a team will be the way to go in the future. He may have something there. MLB has over-expanded. The cost of running an MLB franchise is more than most markets will generate in revenue. Worse yet – they want to expand yet again, meaning taking away fans that are in the new markets from existing teams. Baltimore used to be a mid-market team. DC got the Nationals. Baltimore is now a small market team.

        This issue is far more complicated than telling us all owners are billionaires – which they are not – and demanding they lose money on their investments as well as the time they put in to run them.

        The future of MLB may well be small market franchises playing half their games in their market, and half in large cities from outside of the US.

        Reply
        • Samuel

          3 years ago

          In addition to Montreal – San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mexico City come to mind. The Caribbean area and Latin America are hotbeds of baseball as well as Japan and Korea. Fans in those areas PLAY the game ON A FIELD – not on a computer or looking at statistics on a spreadsheet as well as arguing about how much money an owner is worth; meanwhile they don’t understand what a cut-off man is and why that’s important.

          The issue is logistics of course. That makes Japan and Korea a bit difficult as potential share markets. But flights to Mexico and Caribbean countries aren’t much longer than many flights players now take around America.

          Reply
        • astros_fan_84

          3 years ago

          The altitude of Mexico City is probably not doable for a full season, but a team in Mexico could work.

          2
          Reply
        • astros_fan_84

          3 years ago

          I don’t see it that way. League revenues and salaries keep going. Somebody is making money and attendance is doing fine. The team that won the World Series last year had a low payroll. The Dodgers and Yankees massive payrolls have bought 2 championships in 20 years. Seems like a healthy sport to me.

          I hope the sport goes to 32 teams with 4 divisions of 8 teams in the next CBA.

          1
          Reply
        • Samuel

          3 years ago

          The players are making big money. The agents are making big money. The owners are making some money – mostly paying themselves and their family members to work for the franchise…..but they do have to work. Mostly the owners are making financial killings with the ever-increasing equity they have in their franchises.

          As for more franchises in the US – as I mentioned, MLB only winds up cannibalizing existing markets and watering down a product that is already poor. The giveaway about the future is in the new CBA where MLB will be playing more games out of the country. That is the first step.

          Reply
        • Pete'sView

          3 years ago

          astros_fan_84 — And Mexico City has some of the most polluted air in the world. Even with a domed stadium, Mexico City would be a mistake. A shame because it is a cultural center.

          Reply
    • Pete'sView

      3 years ago

      Redstitch108* 2 — This was the agreement made decades ago. Get over it. A’s aren’t moving to San Jose, but they sure as hell deserve a better stadium. I hope it’s in Oakland, but the city fathers have bee dicking around with it for too long.

      If it doesn’t get resolved soon, let the A’s find a city that welcomes them.

      Reply
  7. HalosHeavenJJ

    3 years ago

    That Oakland project will need two decades, not two years.

    It’ll be fun catching baseball in Vegas on a fight weekend.

    3
    Reply
  8. mpwr2

    3 years ago

    The Oakland A’s are in the fifth largest metropolitan market, and pioneered the idea of claiming to be poor to maximize team profits through welfare for billionaires.

    6
    Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      3 years ago

      “ welfare for billionaires.”

      Sir, I am 99% sure they don’t refer to it this way, but I could be mistaken.

      Reply
    • ABStract

      3 years ago

      Socialism for the rich, capitalism for the rest of us…how else to describe “revenue-sharing”?

      1
      Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        3 years ago

        My comment was sarcastic. It’s obvious they don’t refer to it that way. It’s also obvious it shouldn’t be done. Furthermore, it’s borderline criminal that revenue sharing is pocketed by billionaire owners for profit when it’s sole intended purpose is to provide for “competitive balance” within an industry under an umbrella of a Congressionally protected monopoly………………. but, I digress. Whatever.

        2
        Reply
  9. 66TheNumberOfTheBest

    3 years ago

    “If socialist CA won’t fork over the taxpayers’ money for a new stadium, just move the A’s to capitalist NV, where they will!!!”

    3
    Reply
  10. halophil

    3 years ago

    How inept will the city government of Oakland be if they lose the Athletics, after losing the Raiders and the Warriors. Losing all three major professional teams in a span of ten years is unfathomable. And to all the naysayers out there – Sports teams are one of the few unifying forces which cities have, they are a source of pride, identity and employment (just ask any of the people who work for sports teams and/or in related industries that operate near stadiums). Think of New York. What comes to mind right away ? Broadway, the Empire State Building, The Yankees . Like it or not, sports matter. They are passed on from one generation to the next and losing a team can be devastating (check the history of Brooklyn from the 1950’s through the end of the century). So Oakland. Wake up and build the stadium.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Place Hunter Dobbins On 15-Day IL Due To ACL Tear

    Astros Promote Brice Matthews

    Red Sox Likely To Activate Alex Bregman Tomorrow

    Phillies Reportedly Targeting Controllable Relievers

    Yankees Prioritizing Pitching, Also Searching For Infield Help

    Orioles Trade Bryan Baker To Rays

    Yankees Release DJ LeMahieu

    Trevor Williams To Undergo UCL Surgery

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Rangers Option Josh Jung

    Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

    Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

    Recent

    Royals Receiving Interest In Catching Prospects

    J.C. Escarra Drawing Trade Attention

    Cristian Javier Begins Rehab Assignment

    Multiple Teams Showing Interest In DJ LeMahieu

    Rafael Devers Suffering From Disk Injury In Lower Back

    Mets’ Dedniel Nunez To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Trade Deadline Outlook: Seattle Mariners

    Reds Activate Jake Fraley, Option Christian Encarnacion-Strand

    Red Sox Place Hunter Dobbins On 15-Day IL Due To ACL Tear

    Cubs Select Brooks Kriske

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version