Headlines

  • Yordan Alvarez Shut Down Due To Setback With Hand Injury
  • Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin
  • Astros Place Jeremy Peña On Injured List With Fractured Rib
  • Tucker Barnhart To Retire
  • Tyler Mahle To Be Sidelined Beyond Trade Deadline
  • Reds Release Jeimer Candelario
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Which Draft Picks Each Team Would Forfeit By Signing A Qualified Free Agent

By Tim Dierkes | November 3, 2022 at 9:27am CDT

As part of the new collective bargaining agreement, MLB and the MLBPA allowed for the creation of an international amateur draft.  As this was something MLB was pushing for, the proposed tradeoff was the elimination of free agent compensation.  The two sides reached their overall CBA in March, but included a July 25th deadline for the possible international draft/free agent compensation trade.  The two sides failed to reach an agreement by that July deadline, so the qualifying offer system for free agent compensation that was agreed to 11 years ago remains in place.

The qualifying offer is set at $19.65MM this offseason, and by mid-November we’ll know which players received and turned down a QO.  Certain star free agents, including Aaron Judge and Trea Turner, are locks to receive and turn down a qualifying offer.  A dozen others could easily join them.

If those players sign with new teams, here’s a look at the draft picks each signing club would lose.

Competitive Balance Tax Payors: Red Sox, Dodgers, Mets, Yankees, Phillies, Padres

If any of these six teams signs a qualified free agent from another team, it must forfeit its second-highest and fifth-highest pick in the 2023 draft. The team will also have its international signing bonus pool reduced by $1MM.

Revenue Sharing Recipients: Diamondbacks, Orioles, Reds, Guardians, Rockies, Tigers, Royals, Marlins, Brewers, Twins, Athletics, Pirates, Mariners, Rays

These 14 teams received revenue sharing and did not exceed the competitive balance tax. If one of these teams signs a qualified free agent, it forfeits its third-highest pick. These teams face the smallest draft pick penalty.  The Twins and Mariners are realistic possibilities to sign a qualified free agent, while the Orioles and a few other revenue sharing recipients may lurk as dark horses.

All Other Teams: Braves, Cubs, White Sox, Astros, Angels, Giants, Cardinals, Rangers, Blue Jays, Nationals

These 10 remaining teams would forfeit their second-highest pick and and have their international signing bonus pool reduced by $500K. The penalty is something of a middle ground.

What happens if a team signs two qualified free agents? The CBA calls for forfeiture of the next highest available draft pick. For example, if a team has already lost its second and fifth-highest picks and it signs a second qualified free agent, it would lose its third and sixth-highest picks. So as in the past, if you’ve already signed one qualified free agent, the draft pick cost to sign another is reduced.

Share 0 Retweet 7 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox Los Angeles Dodgers MLBTR Originals New York Mets New York Yankees Newsstand Philadelphia Phillies San Diego Padres Uncategorized

White Sox Name Pedro Grifol Manager
Main
Offseason Chat Transcript: Cleveland Guardians
View Comments (51)
Post a Comment

51 Comments

  1. Old York

    3 years ago

    Get rid of the CBT/Luxury tax and dump the QO/draft pick compensation. Let the teams spend how they want and on the players they want.

    In addition, I think the “win bonus” idea from Fangraphs is at least slightly better than the CBT.

    blogs.fangraphs.com/mlbs-competitive-balance-tax-i…

    In summary, as the article concludes:

    “Any plan to incentivize small-market teams to put financial value in winning has to reward winning and punish losing. Subsidize investment, tax tanking. That’s not the system MLB actually has, and it’s not a system that MLB actually wants.”

    8
    Reply
    • Jesse Chavez enthusiast

      3 years ago

      Well said, markets like Seattle and Denver draw a good amount of attendance and have nice TV deals, I think those two teams for sure shouldn’t be part of the revenue sharing group.

      3
      Reply
      • bob9988 2

        3 years ago

        I think your equating market size with actual area size and its not equal. The population of NYC is 50% more than the total combined populations of Colorado and Washington state. There are just not nearly as many people west of the Rockies as there are everywhere else. If not for California, the west coast and the Rockies combine for less than a tenth of the US population. All that to say, when Seattle and Denver draw a lot of fans, its cause a sizeable number of people traveled (not an insignificant distance) to see them play. And the media markets have to be massive is size to even come close to equaling what the east coast teams (and California) can get with just a few miles of radius.

        2
        Reply
    • utah cornelius

      3 years ago

      Great article. Worth expanding upon:

      “It says it’s about competition, but without any mechanism to ensure that the proceeds improve competition. It says it’s about balance, but it has no way to ensure that balance. It’s described widely as a luxury tax, but it’s not that either. Luxury taxes, historically, have been directed at what economist Fred Hirsch termed “positional goods,” or goods that are highly prized based on their scarcity and prestige value. Labor costs in a labor-intensive field, though, aren’t really a luxury good, and MLB’s business is mainly putting teams of baseball players on the field. Everything MLB does stems from those games; if the teams didn’t exist, there wouldn’t be as much clamor for t-shirts with cardinals sitting on a wooden stick or ice cream served in a small plastic helmet with a creatively spelled abbreviation of “stockings” on it. Players are no more luxuries for a baseball team than leather is for a shoe company.

      But let’s get to the competitive balance side of things. MLB’s argument is that the CBT is needed to increase competitive balance. Yet there’s very little evidence that it actually has increased competitive balance, and if anything, teams are farther apart since the CBT was implemented, not closer together. From 1984 to 2001, leaving out shortened seasons, the standard deviation of winning percentage was about 67 points. From 2002, the first year of MLB’s modern CBT, to ’21 (excluding the shortened 2020 season), that increases to 74 points; since the start of 2016, when salaries have been static, it’s 80 points.

      Having more money, naturally, is better than having less money, but there’s a limited relationship between winning and total salary…. How a team is run is still a much better gauge of success than how much money it spends….

      ….To put it bluntly, the CBT is more designed to function as a soft salary cap — one with no floor and that’s tied not to any league revenue but simply what players are able to negotiate out of owners at the bargaining table. ..”

      6
      Reply
      • Jesse Chavez enthusiast

        3 years ago

        @utah

        Awesome username bro!

        Reply
        • utah cornelius

          3 years ago

          ;^)

          Reply
      • Pete'sView

        3 years ago

        And that is why—despite both sides refusing to acknowledge it—the best thing for baseball, its fans and its owners, is a ceiling and a floor.

        1
        Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          3 years ago

          Exactly. The fact half the franchise’s in small markets go into each season with their players and fans knowing they don’t have a chance against the large market, free spending teams is what is killing the sport.

          Reply
      • The Saber-toothed Superfife

        3 years ago

        You obviously know nothing about shoes……….

        Reply
        • Jesse Cook

          3 years ago

          “It’s gotta be the Shoes.”

          Reply
    • Long Suffering Mets Fan

      3 years ago

      MLB & MLBPA failed to do this by not agreeing on the international draft. Unless they figure something out this won’t change until the next CBA.

      Reply
    • hockeyjohn

      3 years ago

      Old York, That will put at least half of the teams out of business. Small markets do not have the revenue streams available to them that the larger markets do. Every team is on equal financial footing in the NFL. That allows a smaller market to compete.

      5
      Reply
      • burrwick

        3 years ago

        Tell that to the Lions. ;o)

        Reply
    • BaseballisLife

      3 years ago

      In all other major sports in the US all TV revenue is national, no local TV deals and no ownership of the TV network, and all revenue is split equally. That is not the case in MLB.

      2
      Reply
      • ChuckyNJ

        3 years ago

        Not all TV revenue in the NBA or NHL is national. MLS has had local TV revenue for some clubs but that comes to an end this year.

        Reply
      • This one belongs to the Reds

        3 years ago

        Exactly.

        Reply
      • User 2079935927

        3 years ago

        The small market teams may have less revenue coming on their local broadcasting rights. But they’re taking in a good haul with National TV deals, Merchandising. And they’re all equal owners with the MLB network.

        Reply
  2. docbot

    3 years ago

    Definitely think that baseball could benefit from a promotion/demotion system like premier league football. I’d probably rather see a team playing in Nashville than Pittsburgh at this point.

    3
    Reply
    • Jesse Chavez enthusiast

      3 years ago

      As a Nashville resident, I don’t want a baseball team in my city. It’s growing too much as it is and there would be a hit to the Cardinals and Braves fan base.

      4
      Reply
      • drasco036

        3 years ago

        GET OFF MY LAWN!!!

        Nashville absolutely should get a baseball team and one of the primary reason is its growth. Nashville does an excellent job promoting their sports teams within the city and surrounding area, they do excellent jobs with huge events, obviously cma, NFL draft etc. they are building a new stadium so they can host a Super Bowl also.

        As far as taking away from Cardinals and Braves? Not really… do the Brewers cut into the Cubs fan base?

        It also appears a lot lot high level baseball personnel want a team in Nashville… I cannot remember all the names attached (one being the Phillies PBO) but serious heavy hitters form a group dedicated to bring a team to Nashville (expansion or otherwise).

        3
        Reply
        • Ra

          3 years ago

          And yet Bud Selig tried to eliminate the Twins franchise because it detracted from his, ahem, “daughter’s franchise,”

          Reply
      • DarkSide830

        3 years ago

        Nashville already has a AAA team. They certainly have a “baseball team”.

        Reply
        • drasco036

          3 years ago

          Cool story… everyone knows we are talking about professional baseball, not a minor league team… guess you felt it important to show everyone your knowledge about the “sounds”.

          2
          Reply
        • Jesse Chavez enthusiast

          3 years ago

          @drasco

          I guess you are right but I do think some of those fans would become Nashville fans if they had an MLB team. And I don’t mean to sound like an old man lol. I have just lived in Toronto and Chicago before and don’t want to be in a city that size again lol.

          Reply
    • riffraff

      3 years ago

      GO SPURS!

      Reply
      • avenger65

        3 years ago

        Liverpool.

        Reply
  3. jimmertee

    3 years ago

    Great article Tim, makes it simple to understand. thanks.

    5
    Reply
  4. Dustyslambchops23

    3 years ago

    Why are the Rockies, Tigers, Mariners, Twins getting rev share?

    1
    Reply
    • Holy Cow!

      3 years ago

      I think because the bottom 14 teams of revenue get the sharing.

      1
      Reply
      • Old York

        3 years ago

        Seattle was a bottom 14 team this year? Wow! MLB must be desperate.

        Reply
        • Holy Cow!

          3 years ago

          Looked it up. It’s because their revenue in the buckets that they share is below the average. I would think Seattle would get a lot less sharing than a Tampa Bay or Pittsburgh.

          2
          Reply
        • compassrose

          3 years ago

          I was surprised when an article a couple weeks ago said Seattle was getting revenue sharing. It is not like the team is poor. Own part of the station that carries their games has a decent following which will be crazy next season.

          Tickets for some games will be hard to get. With teams like Yankees Red Sox and especially Toronto fans come and fill a lot of the seats. Especially the Jays they show up in vast numbers. Kind of odd for Seattle to get any money from MLB.

          Reply
  5. RyanD44

    3 years ago

    The penalty for signing a qualified player should only exist if the player is coming from a team that finished in the bottom 1/3 of the league the previous season.

    Big market teams shouldn’t be able to restrict their players from getting a better deal, nor should they profit off their departure.

    8
    Reply
    • MarkieFresh

      3 years ago

      This is my opinion too.

      2
      Reply
  6. hoof hearted

    3 years ago

    What qualifies a team to receive Revenue sharing money? And why are the Mariners receiving Revenue money?

    Reply
    • Holy Cow!

      3 years ago

      They are below the average in the local revenue buckets that are shared.

      1
      Reply
  7. Digdugler

    3 years ago

    draft picks being tied to revenue sharing is quite possibly the dumbest thing that was ever thought of.

    1
    Reply
    • martevious

      3 years ago

      MLB and the MLBPA aren’t known for their intelligence. They are the most dysfunctional of any of the pro sports leagues.

      2
      Reply
  8. stymeedone

    3 years ago

    This does a great job of showing diversity of market size throughout MLB. 6 teams are well above average. 10 teams are about average and 14 teams are below average. In other words, some markets have such a large advantage due to where they are located, that it skews the monetary average quite high so that there are only 6 premium revenue teams.

    2
    Reply
  9. Deleted Userr

    3 years ago

    Big mistake on the Padres and Red Sox’s parts going over the luxury tax and this is precisely why.

    Reply
    • bbatardo

      3 years ago

      It’s not that big of a deal. I can’t speak for the Red Sox, but the Padres probably weren’t going to sign a free agent with a qualifying offer unless they decide to go big and if they do losing a 2nd, 5th and 1M International money isn’t the worse thing in the world since they will be World Series contenders.

      2
      Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      3 years ago

      It wouldn’t be baseball if the Yankees and Red Sox didn’t go into the luxury tax.

      Reply
  10. BaseballisLife

    3 years ago

    The Padres are receiving revenue sharing and are above the CBT?

    1
    Reply
  11. DarkSide830

    3 years ago

    Biased system that helps cheap teams.

    2
    Reply
    • hockeyjohn

      3 years ago

      MLB’s setup favors greatly the large market teams. They have many more revenue streams available to them.

      2
      Reply
      • User 2079935927

        3 years ago

        More? Such as? I think meant larger.

        Reply
  12. gary55wv

    3 years ago

    X

    Reply
  13. CHS O'sFan

    3 years ago

    One thing I thought about a while back; the O’s 3rd pick is a Comp rd B pick. If they use that in a trade, then sign a QO FA, they’d sacrifice their 3rd round pick, correct?

    Reply
    • Ra

      3 years ago

      Yes

      Reply
  14. Paolo1900

    3 years ago

    I’m tired of paying a small fortune to attend games, and for rising cable/satellite/streaming rates because of player salaries and TV deals. Increasing the cap means that you & I are paying more– for oftentimes an inferior product. Needs to be a hard cap, and much less than it is presently…AND a higher floor, so owners aren’t just stealing from their teams’ fans.
    And something needs to be done about the cost of these TV deals . I don’t care so much about draft pick compensation, because some teams (especially my favorite team) don’t know how to evaluate & draft talent anyways.

    Reply
    • burrwick

      3 years ago

      Must be a Tigers fan…:0))

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Yordan Alvarez Shut Down Due To Setback With Hand Injury

    Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin

    Astros Place Jeremy Peña On Injured List With Fractured Rib

    Tucker Barnhart To Retire

    Tyler Mahle To Be Sidelined Beyond Trade Deadline

    Reds Release Jeimer Candelario

    Dave Parker Passes Away

    Griffin Canning Diagnosed With Ruptured Achilles

    Pirates Reportedly Have Very Few Untouchable Players At Trade Deadline

    Griffin Canning Believed To Have Suffered Achilles Injury

    Mariners Looking For Corner Infield Bats; Ownership Willing To Bump Payroll

    Wander Franco Found Guilty Of Sexual Abuse

    Mariners Place Rowdy Tellez On Release Waivers

    Max Meyer To Undergo Season-Ending Hip Surgery

    Whit Merrifield Announces Retirement

    White Sox Sign Noah Syndergaard To Minor League Deal

    Corbin Carroll Placed On IL With Wrist Fracture

    Hoops Rumors Has The Latest On NBA Draft, Free Agency

    Mets Option Francisco Alvarez

    Reds To Promote Chase Burns For MLB Debut

    Recent

    Mets Trade Donovan Walton To Phillies

    Colin Poche Elects Free Agency

    Trey Mancini Opts Out Of D-Backs Deal

    Padres To Select Eduarniel Nunez

    Brewers’ Connor Thomas To Undergo Elbow Surgery

    Yordan Alvarez Shut Down Due To Setback With Hand Injury

    Jorge Mateo To Miss 8 To 12 Weeks With Hamstring Strain

    Reds To Sign Buck Farmer To Minor League Deal

    Pirates Trade Hunter Stratton To Braves

    Rockies Designate Sam Hilliard For Assignment, Select Austin Nola

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version