Headlines

  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Latest On MLB’s Expansion Timeline

By Anthony Franco | February 20, 2024 at 11:24pm CDT

With the A’s and Rays nearing resolution on their long-running stadium disputes, expansion could become a more pressing topic for MLB in the second half of the 2020s. Rob Manfred said earlier this month he hoped to have the next couple major league cities agreed upon by the end of his tenure as commissioner. Manfred plans to retire at the conclusion of his term in January 2029.

ESPN’s Jeff Passan writes that while there are no current expansion plans in place, many high-ranking team and league officials consider it inevitable the league will move to 32 franchises. Passan suggests that’s unlikely to occur before the early portion of the 2030s, a timeline that generally aligns with Manfred’s goal of getting the ball rolling before leaving office in five years. There are clear logistical issues — expansion fees, stadium construction, etc. — that’d need to be sorted out between narrowing the field of cities and putting two more MLB teams on the field.

While the league could get a jump on that process, expansion isn’t yet a priority. The A’s are still figuring out where they’ll play between 2025-27. Manfred said this month that MLB also needed to “get our footing on local media a little bit better” before making significant changes. That’s a reference to the uncertain broadcasting revenues facing a number of teams as cord-cutting has threatened the viability of many regional sports networks.

There will also be another round of collective bargaining negotiations before the expansion process kicks into gear. We’re two-fifths of the way through the current CBA, which expires in December 2026. The last round of collective bargaining resulted in a 99-day lockout over the offseason, the first official MLB work stoppage since the strike in 1994-95. Labor issues also delayed the return to play during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. It’s possible the next round of CBA negotiations could be similarly contentious.

Once expansion does become a more immediate concern, various cities could make a push for teams. Passan reports that early planning is to choose one team each from the East and West. According to Passan, Nashville and Salt Lake City have emerged as preliminary frontrunners.

Music City Baseball was established in 2019 with the goal of bringing a franchise to Nashville. Don Mattingly, Tony La Russa, Bruce Bochy, Dave Stewart and Dave Dombrowski are among a host of high-profile people who have been associated with the project.

Salt Lake City’s push didn’t begin in earnest until last April. Big League Utah, a group led by former Utah Jazz owner Gail Miller, began the process of seeking an expansion franchise. SLC is one of three cities — joining Oakland and Sacramento — that is in contention to host the A’s before their planned Vegas stadium opening in 2028. Landing the A’s on a temporary basis would presumably boost their chances of securing a franchise of their own in the future.

Of course, plenty can change in the intervening few seasons. Nothing is anywhere near set in stone. The process hasn’t yet begun, but it could come into focus within the next couple years. MLB has been at 30 teams since adding the Diamondbacks and Devil Rays in 1998, the longest static period since the league first expanded from 16 to 18 teams in 1961. Passan’s column is worth a full read, as he lists a few other cities that have been floated as possibilities and covers a number of challenges that groups could face as they try to secure a new franchise.

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Uncategorized

Hollander: Mariners Additions Likely To Be “More On The Margins”
Main
Rays Sign Amed Rosario To One-Year Deal
View Comments (180)
Post a Comment

180 Comments

  1. Steve F

    1 year ago

    Guys, I need to raise $10 billion dollars before they announce the expansion. Any suggestions??

    10
    Reply
    • long-suffering

      1 year ago

      Phase 1: collect underpants
      Phase 2: ???
      Phase 3: profit

      26
      Reply
      • tedtheodorelogan

        1 year ago

        That’s a pretty good idea if you gnome what I mean.

        5
        Reply
      • robluca21

        1 year ago

        Hey guys what’s phase 2 again ?

        1
        Reply
    • Lloyd Emerson

      1 year ago

      Go down to the crossroads and sell your soul.

      10
      Reply
      • Monkey’s Uncle

        1 year ago

        I tried that, but I couldn’t even flag a ride. It was like no one knew me, everybody passed me by…

        8
        Reply
    • deepseamonster32

      1 year ago

      Private equity. Depending on how ruthlessly willing you are to destroy people’s livelihoods, you could raise billions.

      14
      Reply
    • Treehouse22

      1 year ago

      Gold sneakers. You could charge something crazy like $399 per pair. Or maybe some crappy red ball caps.

      25
      Reply
      • tedtheodorelogan

        1 year ago

        Reselling for close to 10 grand on ebay.

        Reply
        • hitztheball

          1 year ago

          I have seen $2 baseball cards listed for $10k on eBay. List it for whatever you want, just need 1 idiot to come along

          2
          Reply
    • unpaidobserver

      1 year ago

      Marry money. Works every time.

      5
      Reply
    • Paleobros

      1 year ago

      Lemonade stand.

      4
      Reply
    • Manfred’s playing with the balls

      1 year ago

      MLB owners would just threaten to move the team unless they got tax payer funds to build shopping malls and hotels next to a new ballpark.

      The best baseball parks are old but somehow we let billionaires get welfare to build crappier versions. Just doesn’t make sense

      1
      Reply
      • SCOTTG3

        1 year ago

        Jerry Reinsdorf…”Did someone call me?”

        Reply
    • I.M. Insane

      1 year ago

      Start a YouTube channel and do Try-On hauls. I don’t know. I’m trying to help.

      1
      Reply
    • User 401527550

      1 year ago

      A lot of parlay bets on March madness.

      Reply
    • Daryl Pauley

      1 year ago

      GoFundMe.

      Reply
    • Arnold Ziffel

      1 year ago

      A massive yard sale or take over a Mexican cartel.

      Reply
    • Seymour Buttz

      1 year ago

      Wild Idea….I know that it’s not a popular idea but… Due to New York City being a baseball town(rather than LA a basketball town). The population of the city and with NJ population included would be a more financial stable situation for a 3rd NYC team in my opinion. Plus it would be interesting to see how a new fan base would react. Building a baseball complex at the Meadowlands or expand the MetLife stadium where the Giants/Jets play would be a very interesting idea. Your thoughts about this?

      Reply
      • User 401527550

        1 year ago

        Why when there is so many untapped markets out there? It’s not just the local area but the region as a whole. The southeast is so underdeveloped for Major League Baseball it is amazing.

        1
        Reply
      • kje76

        1 year ago

        First, the Mets and the Yankees would never agree to an expansion team in their territory (for the same reason, likely Austin/San Antonio will not get an expansion team despite the large and underserved market). Second, the MLB wants to expand the market – bring in new and relatively untapped markets. They already have a longterm presence in NY/NJ.

        Plus, and this is more of a nitpick, North Jersey’s population. Below roughly the mid-point of the state, South Jersey tends to be Phillies.

        Reply
    • kyletw

      1 year ago

      There’s always money in the banana stand

      1
      Reply
    • JRW 2

      1 year ago

      Easy Peasy, just overvalue your House and take a mortgage like Trump

      Reply
  2. KingZeke8

    1 year ago

    MLB already has attendance issues with several clubs. Maybe it’s just me but my gut tells me expansion right now would not go well for MLB.

    10
    Reply
    • aragon

      1 year ago

      Nashville will be another beggar cities. Its own TV market is barely 1 million and surroundig area have a lot of Cards fans and Braves fans.

      6
      Reply
      • Tigers3232

        1 year ago

        Nashville’s media market is the 26th largest in the US with 2.45M people. That 2.45M is estimated to be composed of 1.2M households with TVs.

        4
        Reply
        • aragon

          1 year ago

          Check the teams in 25th and 27th largest media markets. Beggar teams.

          1
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          1 year ago

          The 27th largest media market is Salt Lake, which if you read the article is the other city believed to be getting a team in expansion.

          The 25th largest market is Indianapolis which has been mentioned in the past. The issue there it’s very close to Cincinnati, it’s close to or overlapping numerous media markets, and it’s an area that’s not seeing significant growth compared to other areas.

          Not sure what Indy or Salt Lake have to do with you using false #s as facts. But ok

          1
          Reply
        • aragon

          1 year ago

          The Reds are not getting the handouts? News to me!

          1
          Reply
      • rondon

        1 year ago

        Do you seriously believe Don Mattingly, Tony La Russa, Bruce Bochy, Dave Stewart and Dave Dombrowski are seriously involved in bringing a team to Nashville because it’s a “beggar city”? Right.

        2
        Reply
        • aragon

          1 year ago

          Let me re-phrase. A beggar team in a nice midsize city.

          1
          Reply
    • Lloyd Emerson

      1 year ago

      I guess it depends on the location. I’d love to see Charlotte get a franchise but I don’t think the market would support it.

      4
      Reply
      • Nosferatu Zodd

        1 year ago

        Charlotte and Raleigh among fastest growing cities. I think Raleigh might be better. Split the 4 major sports between them.

        1
        Reply
      • User 401527550

        1 year ago

        There is a minor league team in almost ever city in NC. They are almost full on a nightly basis. Good weather, good economy and good population. They will have zero problem filling seats.

        Reply
    • User 2079935927

      1 year ago

      Owners are not worried about butts in the seats. They see those HUGE expansion fees coming in.

      6
      Reply
    • Manfred’s playing with the balls

      1 year ago

      MLB doesn’t have attendance issues. Profits and revenues are at all time high and so is competition level.

      Expansion is long over due and the only reason we haven’t had it yet is because billionaires love ripping off taxpayers.
      MLB is a corrupt mafia who extorts fans with threat of moving to salt lake or Nashville.

      Everyone here knows this is true

      7
      Reply
      • This one belongs to the Reds

        1 year ago

        Under the current fouled up system, anyone who starts an expansion franchise is foolish. MLB has a lot to fix before they even think about expanding.

        2
        Reply
        • mrkinsm

          1 year ago

          4x valuation in a decade or two says you’re wrong.

          4
          Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          1 year ago

          KingZeke described it perfectly below.

          Value is on paper. The reality is what someone actually pays. The last two teams for sale were pulled off the market because no one was willing to pay that price. That should tell you something.

          2
          Reply
        • mrkinsm

          1 year ago

          That’s great, now show a sale of a club in the past 40 years that has sold for less than valuation. Valuations get you loans, just ask Trump. No team for sale was pulled because they wouldn’t reach valuation.

          2
          Reply
      • KingZeke8

        1 year ago

        Except it does. Profits and revenues don’t tell the whole story (similar to saying that the stock market doing great = the economy is doing great) considering now more than ever, owners are cashing in on new revenue streams.

        MLB total attendance has been on a downward trend since 2012, seeing it’s lowest point since 2003 in 2019 (I am discounting 2020-2022 as we can all agree outside factors were involved). Granted, we did see a boost back up above 70 million during 2023 which could very well be a sign of things to come, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. Add in inflation and the costs associated with going to the park, MLB losing popularity, more entertaining options, MLB is in a precarious position right now. I’m not saying baseball is dying but it sure isn’t thriving.

        2
        Reply
        • mrkinsm

          1 year ago

          Baseball is doing just fine, all time revenues. Just because they aren’t showing up to the ballpark, doesn’t mean they aren’t watching from their couch at home.

          1
          Reply
        • RodBecksBurnerAccount

          1 year ago

          Average attendance per game has barely changed since 2009.

          Avg attendance per game 2009: 30,324
          Avg attendance per game 2023: 29,293

          with attendance beginning to normalize since 2020. I would imagine it will continue to increase this year to get back to the average from 2009.

          People have been saying baseball is “dying” since the 1950’s.

          5
          Reply
        • RodBecksBurnerAccount

          1 year ago

          Profits and revenue tell a much better story than how the stock market is performing.

          1
          Reply
        • Arnold Ziffel

          1 year ago

          The Colorado Rockies draw well ove 2 million a year and they suck.

          Reply
        • Manfred Rob's Earth Band

          1 year ago

          It doesn’t mean they are watching from the couch either. Blackouts are still a thing and have driven people away from watching.

          Reply
      • bpskelly

        1 year ago

        We are sorta at that point where NFL teams were at two, three decades ago trying to extort cities and regions for a new stadium.

        Reply
    • RodBecksBurnerAccount

      1 year ago

      Not really. 2 of the teams with attendance issues (Oakland and Tampa) are finally having their stadium issue addressed, which will likely improve attendance (although Tamp still chose a bad location).

      The rest of the teams that are in the bottom 5 are just performing badly. If they start winning attendance has proven to increase…just look at Baltimore/Washington/KC/etc. for current/past results.

      2
      Reply
    • drewm

      1 year ago

      Build a stadium with only a few luxury boxes in the middle of a shopping mall, don’t even bother with attendance, focus on having a AAAA broadcast experience

      Reply
      • Lanidrac

        1 year ago

        So a broadcast experience that is better than a AAA team but lousy compared to most MLB standards?

        1
        Reply
        • drewm

          1 year ago

          It’s a gaming reference

          Reply
  3. Seymour Buttz

    1 year ago

    I know that this is not a popular opinion but…would and/or could New York host a third team but they would be based in New Jersey(Giants stadium sports complex or the Meadowlands complex). Hear me out: the Rays franchise would transition to NY/NJ. But would or could this work or even an Expansion team in the NY/NJ area?

    6
    Reply
    • unpaidobserver

      1 year ago

      I think you’re right but neither New York team will ever agree to split its market with a third team.

      9
      Reply
      • Seymour Buttz

        1 year ago

        What do you think would need to happen in order for a 3rd NYC/NJ team to play out? I was thinking population wise and financially a new team would most likely be the most successful team when considering all of the other cities and options.

        1
        Reply
    • elmedius

      1 year ago

      Georgia is the state with the highest population that doesn’t already have two teams. Atlanta has no problems with attendance. So if we’re adding to already covered markets; let them have a second team before giving NY a third.
      Nashville and Montreal seem like the obvious choices to me. SLC as the back up.

      2
      Reply
      • BravesFan2024

        1 year ago

        No this would be a terrible idea. Atlanta has been fine filling the stadium with the team at peak levels but it wasn’t that long ago they couldn’t even fill SunTrust when they were middle of the division type team.

        Braves fans as a whole are not bad fans if you span across the entire country. The city of Atlanta itself does not have a great fanbase for baseball though.

        In no way could that city support two baseball teams. Nashville would be the better option if you want another team in the south.

        If I was to give another city a second team it would be Boston.

        Also the state of Georgia having the highest population without a second team means nothing. You’re talking about the city supporting two teams, not the state.

        2
        Reply
        • JRW 2

          1 year ago

          Portland making a bit of noise with the Diamond project commitments and they are in the mix, and Mexico City is gaining some traction which would be good for the sport..

          1
          Reply
        • unpaidobserver

          1 year ago

          Problem with Mexico City is travel. Wouldnt envy that West Coast Swing.

          Reply
        • JRW 2

          1 year ago

          Completely agreeable with that (X EC) but on the other hand making that swing down the east coast starting in Canada probably isn’t to envious either. LOL…

          1
          Reply
      • Lanidrac

        1 year ago

        You still need a location. The Atlanta metro area isn’t big enough to support two teams on its own, and what Georgia metro area other than Atlanta is large enough to support even a single MLB team?

        If we’re talking about a market that already has a team getting another one like NY, LA, Chicago, and Baltimore/D.C., the best choice would actually be Toronto (if judging solely by market size rather than spreading the wealth to a second Canadian city).

        1
        Reply
        • Seymour Buttz

          1 year ago

          Due to New York City being a baseball town(rather than LA a basketball town). The population of the city and with NJ population included would be a more financial stable situation for a 3rd NYC team in my opinion. Plus it would be interesting to see how a new fan base would react. Your thoughts?

          1
          Reply
        • mrkinsm

          1 year ago

          Vancouver would easily support a team.

          Reply
        • elmedius

          1 year ago

          Fair enough. Didn’t think of Toronto. Just definitely don’t think NY would be successful with a third team. Just know the Braves aren’t technically in Atlanta and that metro area is huge and still growing in size and population pretty rapidly. You’re totally right that Georgia doesn’t really have a relevant second city. And honestly don’t like the idea of cities having two teams. Just really hated the NY idea lol.

          I stand with Nashville and Montreal as being the most obvious and logical. Puerto Rico could be cool too, but I’m still on SLC as the backup.

          1
          Reply
      • Nosferatu Zodd

        1 year ago

        North Carolinahas basically same population with zero teams. Texas and Flotida seem logical for 3rd team. Tampa isn’t the problem itself. It’s location of stadium.

        Reply
    • cuffs2

      1 year ago

      Just no!!!

      Reply
  4. TheHighCheese4Me

    1 year ago

    The talent level isn’t good enough to dilute it at this point. The new franchises would be dumpster fires.

    7
    Reply
    • unpaidobserver

      1 year ago

      Agree.

      3
      Reply
    • User 2079935927

      1 year ago

      It hasn’t been good since the 70’s but you would think with the population bigger and bigger their would be talent . I mean 60 more players out of millions of people. Need more scouting.

      1
      Reply
      • unpaidobserver

        1 year ago

        Scoutings not the issue its the cost. It’s a lot of money to train to be a baseball player and the payoff is waaaaaay too far out.

        Reply
      • Tigers3232

        1 year ago

        @Winsolw, I hope this is a weak attempt at humor and not some utterly false statement driven by nostalgia.

        The current US population is roughly 340M opposed to 216M in 1975. MLB has expanded to 30 teams from 24 in 1975. Not to mention the immense growth in international talent in the game. And that’s just the statistics pertaining to the size of current talent pool.

        As for scouting, it’s reach is currently exponentially larger than at any point in the games history. In the 70’s a scout would have to be tipped off on a player, personally stumble upon, or in a few cases have video sent. In today’s world we have what is called the “internet”. There are numerous pages dedicated to tracking prep talent, many games can be viewed real time from nearly anywhere, scouts can be easily reached via email or cell phone. Not to mention the numerous academies dedicated to producing young talent both here and abroad.

        Then there are the statis, nearly every metric shows players hitting and throwing harder, as well as more movement on the ball. The notion that talent is diluted or there’s a lack of scouting is laughable and outright false. Teams have larger scouting staffs than ever as well as employ entire analytics departments to track scouting and every metric imaginable.

        5
        Reply
        • drewm

          1 year ago

          Every word of that.

          Reply
    • Ben T

      1 year ago

      Not enough talent? That’s a bonkers take. The level of competition has never been higher. Drop any current regular into 1973 and he’d be an all-star.

      2
      Reply
    • Os1995

      1 year ago

      The talent difference between a replacement level player and an average mlb player is about 2 WAR. When compared to the number of games per year, the difference between an average mlb player and a replacement level player is much smaller than in the NBA or NFL.

      Reply
      • Lanidrac

        1 year ago

        The NBA only plays 5 players at once and also has an overall smaller roster size. Of course the difference is much higher in the NBA!

        I’m not sure, but the NFL could just be a matter of the sheer difference in games per season not being directly comparable on a linear basis.

        Reply
        • Os1995

          1 year ago

          The point is that the depth is a strength in the MLB. The drop off in talent isn’t as huge as in other sports which makes the MLB prime for expansion because the talent dilution would be barely noticeable and the increase in opportunity for in-person attendance for people who don’t live near a MLB city will bring new fans to the game.

          Reply
  5. dave frost nhlpa

    1 year ago

    The owners will love that expansion fee revenue.
    Let’s face it we are not talking about rocket scientists but if they were smart they would add 3-6(one per division)
    They also need to have the stadium BUILT before first pitch. Construction delays are one thing. The liability of breaking ground is another.
    SLC Nashville Montreal Vancouver Charlotte Portland Albuquerque Las Vegas all have a chance. I’d give Oakland one last shot but that building has to be in place.
    You can chuckle at Vancouver all you want but it’s huge here. Also the Asian population is huge and can pull players to Canada far easier than the U.S.
    imagine if every Sunday home game was family day where they made it affordable-tickets and snacks.

    4
    Reply
    • NickTheDev

      1 year ago

      Why would you go from 30 to 33 or 34 or 35? Those are all logically stupid… when they go to 32 they won’t keep 6 dividions, it will be 4 like it used to be or perhaps 8 (like football does). 36 obviously also maths quite nicely but that would be a ton of expansion and the people saying it would dilute talent would be right about expanding by 6 teams at once like that.

      3
      Reply
      • Lanidrac

        1 year ago

        I don’t think they need to modify the divisions. It’s not a big issue (aside from the schedule makers) to have an extra 6th team in a couple of divisions like the NL Central had from 1998-2012.

        Reply
    • John Kappel

      1 year ago

      I’m really having issues with SLC or Albuquerque getting a team. They are both at higher elevations than Denver and are really small. ABQ is the 32nd largest US city, and SLC is 117th. If the goal is to go to larger cities that can support a team from a population and TV market perspective, San Antonio, Charlotte, Indianapolis, OKC, Nashville, Montreal, and Vancouver should be the cities considered, along with San Juan in Puerto Rico. Large cities, bigger media markets, at not competing with other teams much.

      Reply
      • AHH-Rox

        1 year ago

        SLC is about 1000 feet LOWER than Denver.
        And you have to look at the metro area, not just where they happened to draw the city limits.

        2
        Reply
        • Lanidrac

          1 year ago

          True, but the Salt Lake City metro area is smaller than at least a few other options, and MLB would prefer not to have another team at a rather high altitude.

          Reply
    • C Yards Jeff

      1 year ago

      Get creative MLB

      I say take it out to 6 teams, but instead of playing at the MLB level they start out playing at a secondary level. The MLB creates a world league that these 6 teams are a part of. The two teams with the best records in their division, the United States division, get promoted to the MLB and the 2 teams with the worst MLB records get “relegated” to this world league (for the up coming season).

      Reply
      • Lanidrac

        1 year ago

        Relegation is one of the stupidest ideas in the history of sports. Keep that junk out of North America!

        1
        Reply
        • C Yards Jeff

          1 year ago

          Disagree Lanidrac. Discourages team owners from tanking.

          Reply
        • Lanidrac

          1 year ago

          Yes but at WAY too great of a cost to the franchises and their cities and fanbases that do wind up getting relegated at various points.

          1
          Reply
        • C Yards Jeff

          1 year ago

          They’re still playing. More importantly, because the competition is from around the world, IMO it draws enough interest to not hurt the investment made by ownership and the city. The fan base will continue to follow thus support it’s existence.

          Reply
        • Lanidrac

          1 year ago

          An inferior league with teams in the same country *NEVER* draws the same kind of interest and *DOES* hurt the investment greatly. That’s partly why minor league teams don’t draw anywhere near as much support as Major League teams.

          That’s with or without world competition, which is completely unfeasible in a league setting with the extreme differences in time zones, anyway. For world competition, that’s why we have the World Baseball Classic and sometimes have baseball in the Olympics.

          Reply
    • marinersblue96

      1 year ago

      Portland will never get a MLB franchise. They are squarely in the Mariners media region and there is 0.0% chance they sell those rights. MLB cannot force an owner to sell those rights, their owners are not cash poor like the Orioles who needed the $ from DC.

      The article also mentioned San Jose, again 0.0% chance that ever happens. The Giants will never let go of those media rights, if they would then the A’s would of moved there years ago(which is total BS since the A’s owned those rights and only gave them to the Giants so they could get their new stadium built and SF reneged on their deal to give those right back to the A’s after they were able to procure financing)

      1
      Reply
  6. WillieMaysHayes24

    1 year ago

    AL East
    Baltimore
    Boston
    NYY
    Toronto

    AL Central
    Chicago
    Cleveland
    Minnesota
    Detroit

    AL South
    Colorado
    Houston
    Kansas City
    Texas

    AL West
    LAA
    Las Vegas
    Salt Lake City
    Seattle

    NL East
    NYM
    Philadelphia
    Pittsburgh
    Washington

    NL Central
    Chicago
    Cincinnati
    Milwaukee
    St Louis

    NL South
    Atlanta
    Miami
    Nashville
    Tampa Bay

    NL West
    Arizona
    LAD
    San Diego
    San Francisco

    17
    Reply
    • NickTheDev

      1 year ago

      It can be done even better if they are willing to redo the AL/NL into geographic leagues.. Of course all the 90 year old fans will freak out about that, though so probably no way they are willing to go that far.

      1
      Reply
      • Appalachian_Outlaw

        1 year ago

        @NickTheDev- I’m nowhere near 90, and I hate the idea of moving into geographic leagues. Just saying…

        3
        Reply
    • pd14athletics

      1 year ago

      This is cool because 2 weeks ago I sent my friend basically the exact same concept for divisions with expansion. The only variance was I had Oakland being granted an expansion team with the A’s leaving (I’d hope they would be leaving colors and name behind) so Oakland stayed instead of SLC. I had Nashville in a new NL South and I had the exact same new AL South. Only other variance is I had Twins and Reds switching for some reason… probably got too caught up in a map view instead of respecting current division rivalries. Anyways, I thought it was pretty cool to see someone else propose nearly exactly what I had discussed with my friend.

      Reply
    • Not a clever name

      1 year ago

      Willie, not bad, as an alternative I would suggest New Orleans in the AL south and Colorado in the AL west. Salt lake for me just has to many hurdles. You have another issue like Colorado with the elevation, and liquor laws would need to be changed, though they may have already I haven’t been to salt lake in the last 10 years. Also I don’t know if the broadcast market is sufficient, New Orleans has its issues too, but I suspect they could support a team with out cannibalizing Atlanta or Houston’s market to the degree salt lake would Denver’s.

      Reply
      • kje76

        1 year ago

        You realize the Jazz sell alcohol, right? I can’t see that being an issue.

        Reply
    • its_happening

      1 year ago

      Make it 8 teams per division. Old school, old rivalries.

      1
      Reply
    • Melchez17

      1 year ago

      AL West champion with a 60 and 102 record…

      Just have an AL and an NL. Take the top team in each and have a world series. The best team over a 162 game schedule against the best team in a 162 game schedule.
      People will always complain, but at least we won’t have a .500 team winning the series.

      1
      Reply
      • its_happening

        1 year ago

        Uh, sure. AL and NL one division is fine, but your point is inaccurate. AL West winner wouldn’t be 60-102 and justifying your position here will need serious help.

        1
        Reply
    • User 401527550

      1 year ago

      Replace Charlotte with Nashville and you got a winner.

      Reply
    • Lanidrac

      1 year ago

      The Rockies and the Rays aren’t going to switch leagues just to make the geography a little neater. Plus, if the Rockies are going to weirdly be in a southern division, it might as well be the NL South.

      Reply
      • pd14athletics

        1 year ago

        Switching leagues isn’t that big of a deal in my eyes with universal DH. Bigger thing to me would be switching divisions and rivalries. Maybe unfair to the Rockies and Rays, but I think keeping their NL West/ AL East counterparts in the same division would be more important. More history there between the other teams. Rays I do see some perks – in state rival is now in division. Braves would be a draw. They’d also have an expansion team in Nashville that would be exciting. Rockies swap wouldn’t be as exciting for the team or fans. But some things would need to change up to accommodate 2 new teams. Baseball would most likely go to 4 divisions of 4 teams in each league if they brought the count up to 32 teams. Maybe they’d do a NBA style East and West but I think the 4/4 is much more likely. Anyways division rivals aren’t what they once were. Teams play the rest of the league more than they used to. In division went from 19 times against each division rival to 13 I believe. And with the new format they could map out the schedule however they see fit. Anyways this was just an exercise for fun, I just thought it was funny/cool the original poster had basically the same league layout that I envisioned. I’d be curious to hear your alternate layout.

        Reply
    • mgomrjsurf

      1 year ago

      Not really geographical more like NFL. Orlando already has a Stadium in place.

      Reply
    • Lanidrac

      1 year ago

      Here’s my version with better geography and no league switching:

      NL East
      Mets
      Philliies
      Pirates
      Nationals

      NL Central
      Cardinals
      Cubs
      Brewers
      Reds

      NL South
      Braves
      Marlins
      Diamondbacks
      Nashville/Charlotte

      NL West
      Rockies
      Giants
      Dodgers
      Padres

      AL East
      Yankees
      Red Sox
      Blue Jays
      Orioles

      AL Central
      Twins
      Tigers
      White Sox
      Indians

      AL South
      Rays
      Astros
      Rangers
      Angels

      AL West
      Mariners
      Las Vegas Athletics
      Royals
      Salt Lake City / Portland / Vancouver

      1
      Reply
      • its_happening

        1 year ago

        Would rather 8 teams per division, reignite old rivalries and balance the schedule. Eliminates more have-not teams that play in poor divisions.

        AL East is still stacked. Divisions are more balanced with more teams.

        Reply
        • Lanidrac

          1 year ago

          OK, with the current 12-team playoffs, that would leave enough Wild Card spots that 8-team divisions would work well enough, certainly a lot better than when there were only 8-team leagues with no Wild Cards.

          Reply
  7. arty! Believes Jevon Belcher Quit on the Chiefs

    1 year ago

    Oklahoma. Put them in same division as the two Texas teams and sell it as mlb red river rivalry. Profit

    Should also look at states without professional teams. Alabama comes to mind.

    1
    Reply
    • mgomrjsurf

      1 year ago

      Orlando other then cities that have a NFL Team and wi,long to share their Dome/Stadium.

      Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        1 year ago

        Orlando market is owned by the Rays.

        1
        Reply
    • Not a clever name

      1 year ago

      I think New Orleans would beat out any city in Alabama and take less broadcast and merch revenue from Atalanta

      Reply
    • Melchez17

      1 year ago

      “Should also look at states without professional teams. Alabama comes to mind.”

      Michigan and Colorado too.

      1
      Reply
      • pd14athletics

        1 year ago

        Detroit Tigers and Colorado Rockies?

        Reply
    • Cleon Jones

      1 year ago

      Weird Al on the wholesome folks of Bama:

      “I was feelin’ pretty down
      ‘Till my girlfriend came around
      We’re just so alike in every way
      I gotta say

      In fact, I just thought I might
      Pop the question there that night
      I was kissing her so tenderly
      But woe is me

      Who would have guessed
      Her family crest
      I’d suddely spy
      Tattooed on her thigh
      And son-of-a-gun
      It’s just like the one on me

      Tell me
      How was I supposed to know we were both related?
      Believe me, if I knew she was my cousin we never would have dated
      What to do now? Should I go ahead and propose
      And get hitched and have kids with 11 toes
      And move to Alabama where that kind of thing is tolerated?”

      2
      Reply
    • Lanidrac

      1 year ago

      There are good reasons why places like Alabama don’t have any top level pro teams.

      1
      Reply
    • marinersblue96

      1 year ago

      You also have to think in terms of corporate $$. There isn’t enough in Alabama to support a professional franchise, better chance for Arkansas to land a team than Bama.

      1
      Reply
      • arty! Believes Jevon Belcher Quit on the Chiefs

        1 year ago

        If there’s enough in Bama to make it a top 5 profitable college in the entire college football system there’s definitely room for an mlb team

        Reply
        • marinersblue96

          1 year ago

          Revenue is one thing, but their NIL is seriously lacking. Saban mentioned that a few times. They don’t even rank top 15 in NIL, that money comes primarily from corporate $.

          Alabama would lack in media rights, their TV deal would be the worst in MLB.

          1
          Reply
        • Lanidrac

          1 year ago

          College teams are mostly watched by their alumni (and current student body) regardless of geography. College teams also don’t play 81 home games each year.

          1
          Reply
        • arty! Believes Jevon Belcher Quit on the Chiefs

          1 year ago

          NIL money is based on name image likeness of players that a third party corporation pays to said player. Individual players not being marketable is completely different than bama having a huge tv deal because they’re a winning program and separate from corporation money that goes into bama from commercial deals and advertising. Bama got into the 24 playoffs cause they were more marketable than Florida State would have been.

          Like everything stars are marketable. That’s true in any sports college minors or pros.

          Reply
  8. Zerbs63

    1 year ago

    This is just what we need more areas that blackout MLB games.

    3
    Reply
    • NickTheDev

      1 year ago

      Read the article, they want to fix that FIRST.

      1
      Reply
  9. deepseamonster32

    1 year ago

    Hoping for Portland. I know they’re buying a golf course down there hoping to build a ballpark.

    4
    Reply
    • JRW 2

      1 year ago

      Kinda hoping also since I do not really see any Mariners support and it’s just to far. Hoping to catch a Giants Yankees game one of these days.in SFO. I wish Portland understood what a decent complex could bring in the form of solid jobs and business, Not stadium jobs but the solid blue/white collar jobs behind the scenes.

      Reply
  10. mlbh

    1 year ago

    Any chance San Diego gets a second team so I can stop rooting for the Padres

    4
    Reply
  11. websoulsurfer

    1 year ago

    Oakland has the A’s over a barrel. Both Sacramento and SLC would see Fisher losing $50-70 million per season in TV money and force him to come up with significant cash upfront to make it possible to play in those minor league ballparks.

    It appears that the city of Oakland is insisting on two things to extend the A’s lease at the Coliseum. #1 that Oakland be given an expansion team. That is on Manfred and the other owners. #2 that Fisher sell his share of the land that the Coliseum sits on to AASEG. He refused to do so when they offered him $115 million. (He cannot sell without the city’s approval, so who it gets sold to is up to the city)

    Fisher holds no leverage in the situation. He either agrees to sell his share of the Coliseum property or he has to move out of Oakland, he loses his TV money, and has to come up with $15-22 million right now for upgrades to the minor league ballpark he moves to.

    Fisher would benefit by keeping the $70 million annually from the TV deal and not having to come up with millions he can never recoup for upgrades to a park his team will play in only 3 seasons plus he will get enough money to cover the $55 million he still owes Alameda County for the Coliseum property and another $60 million he can use to build the park in Las Vegas.

    So the honus is now on MLB. Will they approve the 1st expansion team going to Oakland and Joe Lacob as the owner?

    5
    Reply
    • Tigers3232

      1 year ago

      They ll negotiate TV contracts with wherever they end up playing if it breaks current media contract. It ll likely then be composed of 3 deals; 1 for temp location, 1 for OAK, and 1 for Vegas. Yes it ll be for a fraction of current deal. TV deals in general are worth less in wake of Bally’s fiasco. OAK’s market is clearly diminished. The temp location will probably do well ticket wise bit be a tough draw for broadcasting, and Vegas’s enthusiasm is probably not all that strong at this point. I could see them salvaging $35-40M tho with 3 new TV deals. The other $30-35M will be wrote off which will lower the loss significantly by lowering taxable revenue.

      As for OAK ever receiving another franchise, I’d say there mayor has slammed any crack in that door. This will be 3rd pro sports team to leave. The local government does not seem easy to deal with, and if/when A’s leave SF will vehemently lay claim to that territory from that point forward.

      I’m not trying to be a naysayer or talk down on the hopes of A’s fans, I’m just stating reality. As far A’s fans, I truly feel horrible for them. I’d be irrate I’d any of Detroits teams left, especially the Tigers. It’s beyond unfortunate how the sports landscape has shifted on them.

      2
      Reply
    • John Kappel

      1 year ago

      I also heard that Oakland is saying to stay for the next couple of years, Fisher has to give up the rights to the name of the A’s and all the team records. it would be a if Vegas was a brand new team, and whenever baseball comes back to Oakland, they would just be the A’s again.

      Reply
      • Tigers3232

        1 year ago

        OAk’s Mayor has tried to use that as leverage. SEA did the same thing and was successful with the Sonics. I don’t see MLB or A’s Franchise even entertaining that option. The A’s name and brand has a rich history, far more valuable than any potential media deal losses. And it’s unlikely OAK is ever going to get another Franchise after their local governments hard line negotiating stance.

        2
        Reply
      • LordD99

        1 year ago

        But the new team won’t be the A’s. The Athletics as an organization have been around since 1903. Philadelphia, Kansas City, Oakland, and next Las Vegas. Why would the city even care about the name. They should care about getting a team. Their concern should be in trying to get MLB to consider them as a future expansion or relocation city, not in keep an historic baseball name that doesn’t belong to the city. Even if the Athletics gave up their name, they can move to Vegas, call themselves the Aces, which will become quickly the A’s!

        Reply
        • Os1995

          1 year ago

          Las Vegas already has a professional sports team called the Aces.

          1
          Reply
  12. elvis26

    1 year ago

    I hope Nashville and Portland Oregon get expansion teams!!!

    3
    Reply
  13. LordD99

    1 year ago

    The current owners will not want to split their revenue pie with two new teams unless they’re sure they can add to the pie.

    2
    Reply
    • mrkinsm

      1 year ago

      They absolutely will…because of the ridiculous expansion fees that each new owner will have to pay to the current 30 ownership groups.

      Reply
      • LordD99

        1 year ago

        That’s the balance. It will happen, but it’s been a key issue on why expansion hasn’t happened in a long time.

        Reply
        • mrkinsm

          1 year ago

          Expansion hasn’t happened because the clubs that currently exist have to have stadium deals first. If TB and OAK had locked in stadiums 10 years ago MLB would have already expanded.

          Reply
  14. its_happening

    1 year ago

    The injection of new cash was needed 2-3 years ago. Did not need to wait for the Rays and A’s situation to be fixed when new money would have helped the league as a whole. At least $3-billion divided by 30 teams would have gone a long way.

    Reply
    • User 401527550

      1 year ago

      Yes those Billionaires sure needed the money two years ago.

      Reply
      • its_happening

        1 year ago

        The entire league couldve used the money. This goes beyond owners and players (grounds crew, stadium workers, office people day to day, renovations etc).

        But hey, if you want to go crowdless and fire a majority of workers by all means. I don’t agree with your position to get rid of jobs but you’re entitled to that stance.

        Reply
        • User 401527550

          1 year ago

          Do a majority of workers get fired? When did that happen?

          1
          Reply
        • its_happening

          1 year ago

          Can happen. What, you really think hourly workers didn’t get hit hard in 2020 with only 60 games played? I know for a fact some Blue Jay employees were let go in 2021 thanks to no ballgames, while others didn’t work for nearly 2 years.

          Stop making this about owners. You don’t know the game’s history if that is the BS stance you want to take.

          Reply
        • User 401527550

          1 year ago

          What would have expansion done to change that? They got covered just like everyone else by government programs when people didn’t go to work. So they got extra unemployment benefits of more then what they were being paid for two years for not working. Not sure what that has to do with baseball expansion fees. That money isn’t going to hourly workers.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          1 year ago

          Job creation? 10 more minor league affiliates? New money? Think beyond the players, please.

          Your billionaire owner point is useless but thanks.

          Reply
    • Lanidrac

      1 year ago

      They did need to wait simply to see if one or the other was going to relocate to a potential expansion city. Now MLB can cross Las Vegas off their list of options.

      Reply
      • its_happening

        1 year ago

        That’s the claim. I hear you, Lanidrac, but there are a good 5-6 viable cities for MLB teams IMO. As much as they needed to deal with the Rays and A’s, I believe they should have done both. Or, expanded and hoped the new money could have assisted those two teams in-particular.

        I think it was more a want than a need.

        Reply
        • Lanidrac

          1 year ago

          The point is that it would’ve been extremely awkward to suddenly need to cut off expansion negotiations with one or two of those candidate cities when it turns out that another team is going to relocate there instead. Then they’d suddenly need to start negotiating with Oakland and/or Tampa/St. Petersburg as new candidates to get an expansion team by trying to replace the team that just left.

          Meanwhile, the people in those cities trying to land a team would find it very difficult to simultaneously lobby and negotiate for a relocated team and an expansion team at the same time.

          1
          Reply
  15. BadlyBent

    1 year ago

    Boston should get an expansion team. There used to be a team there and they were quite popular.

    3
    Reply
    • deweybelongsinthehall

      1 year ago

      Yes but MLB would fix it as to who the owners would be. They would get the fans going by winning at first, spending and creating buzz only to then switch things for corporate greed…

      1
      Reply
      • BadlyBent

        1 year ago

        Maybe if John Henry plays nice and sells the Sox, they will help fulfill his dream of owning Tampa Bay.

        Reply
        • John Kappel

          1 year ago

          I really don’t think red Sox fans have and reason to complain. Your team has 4 titles in the last 20 years. You average a title every 5 years……

          Reply
  16. Thec’s

    1 year ago

    Half the league is floundering and several teams can’t even compete because of payroll. There is not enough quality pitching to go around now and you want to add more teams? The best thing that could happen is to reduce the number of teams. This version of baseball that the MLB is producing is very sub par and is going to demise the game. People can’t afford to take their families to the games or pay for TV subscriptions. This is a joke!

    2
    Reply
    • Manfred’s playing with the balls

      1 year ago

      Yeah just make it Yankees vs dodgers every year.

      I swear some of you arguing less teams make it harder for big markets are foolish. Expanding the field increases odds of upset no matter how your simple brain wants to frame expansion

      2
      Reply
    • deepseamonster32

      1 year ago

      Less quality pitchers = more runs!

      Reply
  17. joeseadog

    1 year ago

    In 1962 there were 500 players good enough to play major league baseball, and 400 players in the 3 AAA league’s of top farm teams. Now in year 2024 there are still 500 players good enough to play major league baseball spread through out 750 Major League roster spots, with 750 more waiting in 30 AAA minor league affiliates. The dilution of talent is stunning, yet they seem hell bent on expansion. Why not dissolve some cities on the list and move them to the preferred expansion sites. Does anyone really believe that the Rays or Marlins will still be in Florida in 5 years, that the A’s will find success in Las Vegas? The locals will have to support the A’s, because no one goes to Vegas to see a baseball game, they go to gamble and cheat on their spouses. Locals won’t support baseball in Vegas, at least to the tune of 1.5 million fans a year. The Rays, Royals, Marlins and A’s drew less than 1.5 million fans last year, the finished 3rd, last, 3rd, and last respectively in their divisions. Unless things change, they should each begin exploring moving. I actually believe the Royals will turn things around, but the other 3 chances of that is hoping against hope. Once the hot weather hits, no one wants to sit out in a game in Florida. The Rays have a domed ballpark, but it is a cold, dank dump. When I lived in Albany, NY I went to 10 MLB games between Yankees, Red Sox, and Orioles (at times The Mets, or Nationals) Each is at least 3 to 4 hour drives, but I love baseball. Here in Florida I can get to The Trop in 20-25 minutes, I’ve been 3 or 4 times in my 6 years here, a terrible place to see a game. I buy the MLB baseball package through Spectrum to compensate. No expansion please, just move failing franchises to better locations. The talent pool can’t suffer another diluted hit.

    1
    Reply
  18. cah011381

    1 year ago

    How about Montreal and Mexico City? One in the east, one in the west, and gives each team an entire country as a fan base.

    1
    Reply
    • aragon

      1 year ago

      Do you want to go to Mexico City to watch a game? Good luck!

      1
      Reply
      • John Kappel

        1 year ago

        Even more than wanting to go, it’s at a higher elevation than Denver ……

        2
        Reply
      • cah011381

        1 year ago

        I don’t, but I guarantee people there would show up and that place would sell out every game. There are a lot of places I don’t want to go to watch a game, but it’s not really about me.

        Reply
    • User 401527550

      1 year ago

      How about not. Let’s take care of People here that want to watch baseball.

      Reply
    • LordD99

      1 year ago

      Players and their families will have little interest in making their careers in Mexico City.

      Reply
  19. HEHEHATE

    1 year ago

    Nashville is next. Way too much momentum on that one not to make it happened. Surprised orioles didn’t go that route considering the media split with Washington. Might have been in their best interests financially, but I’m glad the 2nd best part in baseball is t going anywhere anytime soon because of it.

    1
    Reply
  20. TigerFanFromIndiana

    1 year ago

    San Antonio has the largest population without a team and should strongly be considered. Nashville should be able to support a team

    Reply
  21. D Backs GM

    1 year ago

    I think the divisions should be based on revenues. Putting teams of similar revenues together. That way all teams will be forced to maximize spending because when only 4 teams and 1 in 4 each year guaranteed playoffs and then wildcards as well. Then maybe the need for luxury tax would not be as great. Picture dodgers, Giants, Astros, and rangers all in same division. Yankees, Red Sox, Toronto, and Cubs. Braves, Mets, Phillies, and Nationals. Dbacks, Padres, Rockies, Angels. Baltimore, marlins, rays, expansion. Cleveland, Red’s, Milwaukee, Minnesota. White Sox, expansion, Detroit, royals. This would help to keep teams competitive and give lower revenue clubs a shot.

    1
    Reply
  22. wylie K MITCHELL

    1 year ago

    instead of expansion, replace some of the cheap teams. you know the ones that get 30 mil in revenue sharing but their payroll is $50mil?

    3
    Reply
  23. I.M. Insane

    1 year ago

    Expansion is the last thing MLB needs right now.

    2
    Reply
  24. splooz

    1 year ago

    Great….2 more teams that won’t sign anyone during the offseason!

    3
    Reply
  25. Old York

    1 year ago

    I’d prefer a relegation system to move bad teams out of the league but if the league wants to expand, it needs to expand to Tokyo, Osaka & Seoul not cities like Las Vegas & Salt Lake City.

    Reply
  26. BrettPhillips for Prezident

    1 year ago

    The titans picked a bad time to build a city funded stadium. Hopefully they can get it built ahead of schedule and still have plans in place for Nashville.

    Reply
  27. joeseadog

    1 year ago

    I mentioned before about diluted player pools, can you imagine when you were growing up, everyday players batting low .200’s or below and playing every day? I believe we always made exception for Clete Boyer who usually hit around .225-.240 because he was such a great fielder, he was a regular. Now he might bat 5th or 6th in todays game.

    1
    Reply
    • LordD99

      1 year ago

      Access to player talent is higher than it’s ever been in the game’s history.

      4
      Reply
  28. Cleon Jones

    1 year ago

    Dyersville Iowa would welcome a franchise. They have a stadium and plenty of corn.

    Reply
  29. drewm

    1 year ago

    If we weren’t so racist and nationalist we would immediately drop a franchise in Mexico City

    Reply
  30. jhanley108

    1 year ago

    MLB Teams want to move, replace perfectly fine 20 yr old stadiums w/ public $, gambling in stadiums, .215 hitters are considered “great” because of stat nerds, pitchers can’t throw complete games and finally over 3/4 of the teams are terrible because owners don’t care about winning and they want to add more teams. Yay

    Reply
  31. Os1995

    1 year ago

    The expansion of MLB seems like a no brainer. MLB has the deepest talent pools of the professional sports leagues (in terms of difference between average and replacement level player). Additionally from a financial model it makes sense because MLB has the largest fraction of it’s revenue coming from stadium ticket sales which are known to increase with the additional sites. The additional teams give people in the new cities a chance to watch MLB games without having to travel.

    Reply
  32. Enrico Pallazzo

    1 year ago

    Nothing against Salt Lake City itself or the potential fans there but this seems like a terrible idea. How have we not learned our lesson from the Rockies? Trying to play MLB at that elevation is an entirely different game. You might as well be playing on the moon.

    Reply
    • LordD99

      1 year ago

      Moon? Elon Musk enters the chat.

      Reply
  33. Seymour Buttz

    1 year ago

    MLB Realignment

    AL East

    NYYankees
    Blue Jays
    Red Sox
    Phillies
    Pirates

    AL Central

    Guardians
    Tigers
    White Sox
    Reds
    Brewers

    AL West

    Angels
    Mariners
    Athletics
    Diamondbacks
    Rangers

    NL East

    Mets
    Orioles
    Nationals
    Marlins
    Rays

    NL Central

    Cubs
    Cardinals
    Royals
    Twins
    Braves

    NL West

    Giants
    Dodgers
    Padres
    Rockies
    Astros

    Thoughts?

    Reply
    • LordD99

      1 year ago

      I don’t see them breaking up the rivalry between the Mets and Phillies. I expect they could create some form of a “south” division in each league. Astros, Rangers, Rays and O’s in one, Braves, Nashville, Miami, Diamondbacks in another, or some intermix between the two. Eliminating the AL and NL entirely and creating regional divisions has been tossed about, but I don’t see that happening.

      1
      Reply
  34. Bucsfan4ever

    1 year ago

    Nashville will definitely be one of the expansion teams. Salt Lake City, Portland, Vancouver, or Sacramento could be the second team. Oakland will never get another team

    1
    Reply
  35. CarolinaCubsandKush

    1 year ago

    North Carolina needs MLB more than other markets. All metrics are there. No teams within 4-5 hours. Tons of good college baseball and recruits in the area. End this tragedy please.

    Reply
  36. Hamhock

    1 year ago

    I’d like to see an expansion to 36 teams over a ten year period (two each in 2029, 2034, and 2039). It would cross off all of the most likely/viable cities and we’d finally stop arguing about it.

    Reply
    • kje76

      1 year ago

      I can’t see this working. 2 is a big deal, but 6 might be too far a split for the owners.

      Are there any functioning major sports leagues this large?

      Reply
  37. cuffs2

    1 year ago

    Both Nashville and Salt Lake City are very small markets for major league baseball. More suitable markets include Charlotte, San Antonio/Austin, Portland, Sacramento and Montreal. All of which have larger markets. Important when trying to sell tickets to 81 home games . Now Nashville and Salt Lake do have the population to support other sports. Baseball however has historically needed a population in excess of 3 million to support a team.

    1
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Joc Pederson Suffers Right Hand Fracture

    Recent

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    Diamondbacks Select Kyle Backhus, Designate Aramis Garcia

    Athletics Acquire Austin Wynns

    Julio Rodriguez Helped Off Field Following Apparent Injury

    Astros Designate Forrest Whitley For Assignment

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Rays Promote Ian Seymour

    Angels Notes: Soler, Trout, Stephenson

    Mets Sign Julian Merryweather To Minor League Deal

    Brian Snitker Discusses Raisel Iglesias, Closer Role

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version