Blake Snell was still wearing a San Francisco uniform once the July 30 trade deadline passed, as the Giants’ big asking price and the team’s own desire to retain its ace for the playoff hunt ended whatever chance existed of a blockbuster move. Reports linked such teams as the Orioles, Padres, Yankees, Mets, and Cubs to Snell’s market in some capacity, and the New York Post’s Jon Heyman writes that the Dodgers and Rangers also among the clubs “to check in” on Snell’s availability.
The degree of interest shown for either club isn’t known, and Heyman’s “check in” phrasing implies something of a due-diligence exploration to see how open the Giants might’ve been about moving Snell, and what it might’ve taken to land the southpaw. Snell would naturally be an upgrade to any rotation, particularly for teams like the Dodgers and Rangers who have been dealing with pitching injuries all season.
Considering how the Giants and Dodgers have made only two trades with each other since the 1968 season, it is hard to imagine San Francisco seriously considered dealing an ace pitcher to their arch-rivals down the California coast. Even though Giants president of baseball operations Farhan Zaidi worked as the Dodgers’ GM before being hired in his current job, it’s probably safe to guess that whatever talks Zaidi had with his old boss Andrew Friedman about Snell were fairly brief in nature. Los Angeles instead landed Jack Flaherty as its biggest pitching prize of deadline season, and will be counting on Flaherty and some injured pitchers returning from the IL to bolster the staff heading down the stretch and into October.
Landing Snell would’ve completely overturned an otherwise quiet deadline for Texas, as the Rangers brought Andrew Chafin and Carson Kelly into the fold in separate trades with the Tigers, while Michael Lorenzen was dealt to the Royals. The modest set of moves underscored the Rangers’ uncertainty about making a push with a roster that has underachieved for most of the season. Texas had gotten up to a 51-52 record on July 25, but have since lost nine of their last 12 games, probably closing the door on a defense of their World Series title.
Similar to the Dodgers, Texas has also been playing without most of its first-choice rotation for the better part of the year. Several arms were slated to make returns at midseason, but Max Scherzer’s return was short-lived, and other pitchers (such as Jon Gray) have since gotten hurt in the interim. A win-now move like acquiring Snell might’ve backfired if the rest of the roster wasn’t up to par, so it could be that the Rangers also had something of a cursory interest in Snell’s services.
Beyond just this trade deadline, however, these teams’ interest in Snell could extend to the offseason. Snell can opt out of the second year of his Giants contract to re-enter free agency, which now seems to be likely given Snell’s incredible results since returning from the IL last month. (As Heyman hears from two rival general managers, “it would take a ’catastrophic’ or ’debilitating’ injury for Snell to exercise” his 2025 player option and remain in San Francisco.) Texas has a lot of money coming off the books this winter and Los Angeles is always open to signing top free agents, so these could be two teams to monitor if and when Snell hits the open market.
GenoSeligPrieb
Consider the source. Jon Heyman will say that “the Yankees and the Dodgers are in on…” (insert name here), just to get clicks. And having the Giants helping the Dodgers on this one? What a whopper!
This one belongs to the Reds
More that he is helping his buddy Boras out in putting out there that someone was interested.
PoisonedPens
Yeah, Heyman used to be an actual insider with reliable, factual information. Now he just name-drops to stay relevant.
YankeesBleacherCreature
Scott Boras is getting a head start in free agency in August.
TAKERDBACKS
shocker
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
Scott boras has changed (really completely f***ed) the game of baseball so much
Typically when a team holds on to a player at the deadline and said player does extremely well after then that should be a win for the team that kept him, right?
But NO, boras introduced the Oops! All opt outs! contract where it’s not about a bipartisan player gets money, team wins contract but he found out how to f*** the team while keeping the high salary
Sorry about this rant I’m just a part of the I hate Scott boras club
gbs42
How many of these contracts has Boras forced teams to sign?
Team options are pretty much the counter to player opt-outs, and who complains about them?
Don’t expect me to cry for teams and owners about their poor financial positions.
sad tormented neglected mariners fan
I’m not saying boras is every single players agent and holds teams hostage, I’m saying boras has started a new trend in negotiating
Team options are rare especially with higher tier free agents (typically used for franchise star players or marginal role players) but player options are in most of the deals in the offseason, didn’t see this when boras was not an agent
gbs42
Team options are very common, especially in pre-free agent extensions like Acuña and Albies with Atlanta, Robert with the White Sox, etc.
I Believe We Can Win
FWIW, if/when blake snell opts out Giants reserve the right to apply the franchise tag to him and recoup draft asset(s).
You can hate Scott Boras but nobody is forcing these teams to offer these contracts. Teams wouldnt offer them if they didnt benefit the team in some way shape or form.
Conversely, I am sure Arizona isnt too thrilled about paying Jordan Montgomery 25 mill next year.
gbs42
MLB doesn’t have a franchise tag system, and Snell already received a qualifying offer in his career once so he can’t receive another one.
I Believe We Can Win
Sorry meant qualifying offer.
HalosHeavenJJ
Heyman doing his real job: hyping up Boras clients.
User 4245925809
Used to be Boston/NYY never traded, even those 2 make them now. Just what is the animosity between SF/LA?
Mojo37
@johnsilver
there is a rivalry to be sure…it goes back 100 years-plus…but the recent reason for very few trades is not wanting to help a division rival. You don’t see a lot of trades between the Friars, Snakes & LAD or between Friars & Snakes & Giants, or any combo of those.
Mojo37
in 1956 the Dodgers traded Jackie Robinson to the Giants. Jackie retired rather than report to the Giants.
User 4245925809
Thanks Mojo. That was pretty much what was looking for, so must have been real animosity at 1 time.
Just for info.. What set off pretty much decades long no deals between Bos-NYY was idiotic Sparky Lyle for useless Danny Cater in think was 1972 if remember correctly. Lyle went on to be a solid reliever another decade and Cater was finished at the time the deal was made.
Mojo37
uh…how about the BoSox selling Babe Ruth to NYY so the Boston owner could finance a play?
John Bird
Used to be hotter among the players back in the day. Still pretty intense among the fans. One of those rivalries that’s passed down from father to son. The teams play it up to sell tickets.
mlbnyyfan
I don’t want to hear about Yankees almost getting Snell. He should be a Yankee all along with just money. The Same goes with Matt Chapman to replace DJL and Bellinger to replace Rizzo. However this Steinbrenner is a cheap Steinbrenner and refuses to go all like the Dodgers and Mets. George Steinbrenner is angry at what his son has been doing and should be ashamed of himself. On another note Texas needed to go all in at the deadline and also kept Monty. They won one WS and content with just that. I’m very surprised the Rangers didn’t do more last winter or at the deadline.
Mojo37
I hear ya mlbnyy but the Yanks and Mets are the only teams with payrolls over $300 Million. Next closest teams are 50 million back.
spotrac.com/mlb/payroll/_/year/2024/sort/cap_total…
mlbnyyfan
That’s because of Ohtani crazy contract and Texas new stadium should have gone all in to repeat . Also because I hate Houston
Mojo37
actually if you count all of Ohtani’s 70 million per, LAD totals $307 mill to the NYY $316 mill. So you win that race.
Tigers3232
Ohtani only costs the Dodgers $46M annually. $2M in salary and $44M to fund the deferred $ annually.
MotownWings13
$46M/yr is the figure that counts for luxury tax purposes. The Dodgers are paying Ohtani $2M/yr and putting $68M/yr into a trust fund that will be paid to Ohtani later.
ChetLemonaid
*will be paid to casinos later.
FIFY
Mojo37
don’t confuse him with facts please. 🙂
Tigers3232
@Motown Ohtani will b paid $70M later. $44M is the principle needed to accrue to $70M at time deferred monies are due.
Their CBA has rules regarding how and when deferred contracts are funded.
CarolinaCubsandKush
@johnsilver, no team wants to potentially “lose” a trade where a traded prospect becomes a star for your biggest rival.
foppert2
Ha ha. Trading Snell to the Dodgers would have been a controversial move.
CravenMoorehead
Between committing over a billion dollars in free agency, the “deferred contract money” and the gambling fiasco I’d say they’re no strangers to controversial moves.
Atloriolesfan
The Orioles will be serious players in the Snell FA bidding.
Pete'sView
I’m shocked the Orioles and Giants couldn’t come to an agreement on a deal.
Clofreesz
Screw Scott Boras >:(
Indianfan
Yet another worthless “had interest” story which has absolutely no relevance to anything except to give the author something to do.
Hexbreaker
Jon Heyman is a hack.