There’s not been much for fans on the South Side of Chicago to get excited about of late. The club’s lengthy rebuild in the 2010s assembled a core that included well-regarded pieces like Lucas Giolito, Dylan Cease, Eloy Jimenez, Tim Anderson, Yoan Moncada, and Luis Robert Jr. but did not translate to much success on the field; the group ultimately made it to the playoffs in 2020 and ’21 but lost in the first round both years before regressing to an 81-81 record in 2022 and kicking off the latest rebuild.
Since then, White Sox fans have watched that core get dismantled, whether via trades or declined club options, and breakout ace Garrett Crochet followed them out the door over the offseason. Crochet’s excellent pitching performances were the one highlight of the White Sox season this side of the Campfire Milkshake, so that left fans with little to look forward to in 2025… or so we thought. In reality, the White Sox seem to have replaced their dominant ace with another potential front-of-the-rotation arm who came from the most unlikely of places: the Rule 5 draft.
Righty Shane Smith was plucked from the Brewers’ organization and made Chicago’s Opening Day rotation out of Spring Training. It was difficult to know what to expect from Smith, given that an organization as well-regarded for its pitching development as Milwaukee was comfortable leaving the righty unprotected this past winter. That’s quickly proving to have been a mistake. Through his first ten starts of the season, Smith has posted a sterling 2.36 ERA that stands as the eleventh-best figure among qualified starters this year, just ahead of Paul Skenes.
ERA is an imperfect estimator of talent, of course, and Smith’s personal figure is deflated by the fact that a six-run, five-inning outing against the Cubs saw five of those runs scored as unearned. Even setting ERA aside, however, his season has been an impressive one so far: a 3.32 FIP (26th) and 3.57 xERA (t-29th) lend credence to the idea of Smith as a potential front-end arm, even if he isn’t quite in the Cy Young conversation based on those more advanced metrics. Have the White Sox truly found a diamond in the rough, or is Smith’s hot start to his career just a flash in the pan?
Overall, Smith’s profile is a solid one, but there are signs that it’s closer to that of a league average starter than anything else. His 22.0% strikeout rate and 8.1% walk rate are both middle of the pack, and a 45.3% ground ball rate is above-average but not exactly elite. His .259 BABIP and 5.9% home run to fly ball ratio are both top-of-the-scale, but neither of those figures are particularly skill-interactive or sustainable, particularly for a hurler who rarely generates soft contact. If anything, those figures are potential red flags that indicate risk of future regression. Smith’s 3.96 SIERA and 97 xFIP- paint him as a roughly average MLB starter as well, offering all the more reason to think he might regress.
There are reasons for optimism as well, however. Smith generates swinging strikes at a well above average clip, which could be a sign for strikeout potential beyond the average rates that he’s shown to this point. An uptick in strikeouts would raise the floor on his whole profile in a way that could allow him to keep producing at this level. Even without that, however, it’s fair to point out that there have certainly been pitchers who have found consistent MLB success over the years despite mediocre underlying data. Smith’s metrics are better than, as one example, those of Javier Assad on the other side of town. Assad has a career 3.40 ERA across nearly 300 innings in the majors despite lackluster metrics, and that’s a figure any team would happily take from a Rule 5 pick.
How do MLBTR readers think Smith will pan out going forward? Will he be able to find another gear and keep producing like a front-half of the rotation arm, will he settle in as more of a reliable back-end starter, or will this hot start prove to be a total mirage? Have your say in the poll below:
It’s a nice pickup and he’s doing well. Luckily for him, he’ll keep getting playing time with Chicago. Unfortunately for him, his scouting report is getting built up. But a fun story.
Speaking of skenes it’s sad that he’s already in trade rumors with the pirates, you know it’s bad when even espn has that in the headlines
I’m not trying to alarm pirates fans but this kind of happened with Soto and the nationals about declining extensions and not being able to resign
It’s inevitable until mlb gives incentives to big name players to stay with small market teams that developed them doing something similar to what the NBA does. Capping potential earnings.
Teams who hold the nba players rights can offer larger contracts compared to those who don’t.
Would that be something the MLBPA opposing in return for say earlier free agency access. Possibly.
I do think letting teams who hold the players rights be the biggest bidder eliminates the need for as many pre arb and arb years since you can’t be out bid by Yankees dodgers etc etc.
Now will that prevent players from leaving? Course not. But I do think you’d see more players stay if you do
Team who holds the rights: 12 years 300 mill
Teams who don’t hold the rights: 10 years 225 mill
In return players can be eligible for free agency sooner.
Please note this idea is only for home grown players entering free agency for the first time.
Does not impact spending on second contracts or contracts agreed to prior to free agency.
Some form of restricted free agency, giving the current team the right to match or beat an offer, could help even the scales. Could create nice bidding wars for players too
@easy: Soooo, cap the amount a player can earn? Owners would love that. The NBA system is only in place because they have a salary cap and it’s a star-driven league. Plus the NBA system isn’t exactly working; see the Celtics, who are amazing but can’t afford their team.
But on the flip side, you’d never be able to implement this in baseball and using this as a bargaining chip to let players become FAs sooner would never happen. Seven years until FA is the owner’s biggest bargaining chip and no big market owner is going to agree to that just so the cheap, small market teams (whose existence they already subsidize) can *potentially* keep their players longer. They’d let the players become FAs earlier just to see guys like Nutting still trade their players away. I’m laughing at the idea that teams like the Pirates would utilize the ability to offer a player $300 million. Small market teams lose players because they don’t (or can’t) pay big money contracts. Bird rights wouldn’t eliminate that fact.
They can have 3 more full seasons of Skenes and still get a full kings ransom for him. Why would they trade him. The type of package to get him doesn’t exist.
They could clear out an entire teams farm system, even more than what the nationals got for Soto, but for a pitcher
Pitchers are win-now players because they break down eventually when hitters stay on the field a lot more
Imagine if a team like the dodgers or padres offer the full ransom… 99% sure it doesn’t happen but that would make the pirates a playoff team again
Top of the rotation? I doubt it, but I think he’s got the chops to bean excellent multi-threat pitching option going forward.
At $100,000 plus league minimum, he’s already been a bargain. For the record, I voted settling in to league average starter which still makes it an excellent move.
Agreed. Also, while the White Sox have improved defensively since the Eloy Jimenez days, they aren’t exactly running out a team of elite defenders. I buy the upside of any White Sox pitcher who is succeeding in spite of the team behind him.
Impressive 1.1 WHIP
I hope he does really well, but we often see players have a good year or two and then disappear. Just look at Tanner Houck last year to this year. Guy was really great for 2/3 or so of last season. This year with very similar stuff, he can’t keep the ball in the park.
If he ends up as an average major league starter, I’d call that a steal in the Rule 5 draft.
Good for the White Sox if he sticks in their rotation. The Rule 5 draft is functioning as it was designed for.
Mike Vasil also lining up as a shrewd Rule 5 pick. Could there be a third?
I know the brewers regret leaving him unprotected with all of the starting pitching injuries they’ve had this year
I wonder how’d he have done in Milwaukee. It seems like at least part of his success is the new changeup, and I’m skeptical that Milwaukee would’ve had him pick that up.
Because the White Sox are known for being better at developing pitchers than the Brewers?
White Sox struck gold in the R5(S Smith and Mike Vasil)
Technically not Rule 5 but picking up Adrian Houser even for spot starts inspired bit of improv
That moves seems a desperate attempt to upgrade the bullpen, thank god B Wilson is back in the pen.
So that’s why Steve didn’t answer my question about Smith in the chat.
Also, what’s a Campfire Milkshake?
Uh, guess you’re not actually in Chicago