Headlines

  • Braves Sign Charlie Morton
  • MLB Approves Patrick Zalupski As New Rays Owner
  • Pirates To Promote Hunter Barco
  • Brewers Place Brandon Woodruff On 15-Day Injured List
  • 2025-26 Qualifying Offer Projected To Be Around $22MM
  • Tigers Designate Charlie Morton For Assignment
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Blue Jays Release Erik Swanson

By Anthony Franco | June 23, 2025 at 8:27pm CDT

The Blue Jays have released reliever Erik Swanson, reports MLBTR’s Steve Adams. Toronto designated him for assignment last Tuesday. Swanson has already gone unclaimed on waivers and is a free agent.

Swanson spent two-plus seasons with the Jays. Acquired from the Mariners in the Teoscar Hernández trade, the righty had an excellent first season north of the border. Swanson turned in a 2.97 ERA while leading the team with 29 holds across 66 2/3 innings in 2023. That followed a sterling 1.68 ERA showing in his final season with Seattle. He hasn’t maintained that production over the past couple seasons, at least in part due to injury.

The 31-year-old Swanson missed a couple weeks early last season with forearm inflammation. He wasn’t effective when he returned and spent a couple months on optional assignment to Triple-A Buffalo. He looked to be trending towards a non-tender until finding some positive momentum in the second half. Swanson was recalled not long after the All-Star Break and managed a 2.55 ERA with a .172 opponent batting average down the stretch.

Toronto retained Swanson on a $3MM arbitration salary. That would’ve been a bargain if he repeated his second half numbers. Injuries again intervened. Swanson missed the first two months battling a nerve issue in his throwing arm. He was activated on June 1 but allowed runs in four of his six appearances, including three-plus runs in each of his final two outings. His average fastball speed has dropped a tick to 92.9 MPH and he has given up nine runs with five walks and three strikeouts over 5 1/3 innings.

The Jays will remain on the hook for the rest of Swanson’s salary. He wouldn’t cost a new team anything other than a roster spot. They’d pay only the prorated portion of the $760K league minimum for any time he spends on the MLB roster, which would be subtracted from Toronto’s responsibility. His 2022-23 production will at least generate interest on minor league offers, and it wouldn’t be a complete surprise if another team is willing to plug him directly into the MLB bullpen for the league minimum.

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Toronto Blue Jays Transactions Erik Swanson

Tyler Nevin Signs Two-Year Extension With NPB’s Seibu Lions
Main
Twins Have Exercised Rocco Baldelli’s 2026 Option
View Comments (22)
Post a Comment

22 Comments

  1. jimmertee

    3 months ago

    One good year for a reliever. Was Swanson overused? Not a great long term return for Hernandez.

    1
    Reply
    • Canuckleball

      3 months ago

      There’s still Adam Macko. If he ever manages to turn into something, then it may still be an okayish trade.

      If he never amounts to anything, then the Jays would have been better off with one decent year of Teo over one good year of a reliever, followed by a year and a half of awful.

      Given the Jays (in)ability to develop pitching, lets just call this a swing and a miss.

      7
      Reply
      • bullred

        3 months ago

        I still would have taken Swanson’s 29 holds over Teo’s 108 ops+.

        Reply
        • bertod

          3 months ago

          I hear what you’re saying. But Teo just sucked in Seattle. That year was an outlier and even looking at that year, his home/road splits tell the story that he did not hit well at Safeco(whatever it’s called now) Field. His away OPS+ split in 2023 was 128 and home was 71.

          2
          Reply
        • KamKid

          3 months ago

          I think it’s hard to judge a trade by what the new teams got out of the players. It’s not guaranteed, probably not even likely, that the players would have put up identical stat lines had they stayed. Teo’s struggles with that particular home park were quite evident in the home/road splits. I wouldn’t have expected him to struggle had he stayed in Toronto where he always did quite well. Swanson was good for Toronto but on a granular level, some of the pitch characteristics declined immediately in Toronto. And they further declined in the subsequent years. Was that sure to happen, or was that a product of the lab/coaching etc. in Toronto being different than in Seattle? Then there’s the part where we just don’t know the story of Macko yet. Plus, we don’t really know what other trades were possible at the time. One would think there’d have been some win now teams interested in a year of Teo so other options were likely on the table.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          3 months ago

          Bertod is correct. Teoscar has another strong 2023 in a Jays uniform in his walk year. Seattle is a tough place to hit.

          Reply
        • slund24

          3 months ago

          I dont get the Teo sucked in Seattle crowd. He batted .258 with 26 HRs and 93 RBIs. Those were the 2nd most RBIs in his career at that point. He struck out a ton but everyone on the M’s roster did that season. Seattle is much tougher place to hit then Toronto so some numbers dipped but he was pretty much in line with his career averages. I’d love to have the exact same version of Teo in Seattle’s lineup today.

          1
          Reply
        • its_happening

          3 months ago

          slund it’s a bunch of Jays fans trying to rationalize and justify losing a bad trade.

          Reply
      • NoSaint

        3 months ago

        @Canuckleball

        A number of prospect sites have Mako’s upside as a long reliever. A dime a dozen player.

        1
        Reply
      • KamKid

        3 months ago

        Canuckleball, you’re right that Macko really was a big part of the trade value and still has a part to play in how the trade is viewed. If he becomes something, then there’s more value in this trade. I will say though that one path to him providing value is passing him by. I think number 6 and 7 starters are sometimes overlooked and undervalued by fans though when your team doesn’t have them, starting pitching depth becomes a glaring weakness. Having guys in the minors stretched out and ready to step into a rotation role when needed is good value and while Macko can still be that, he’s exhausted two of his three option years already and hasn’t debuted yet. All while the team has struggled to cover innings.

        Reply
      • its_happening

        3 months ago

        Not an ok trade when you are a team (allegedly) going for a World Series and you dump your cleanup hitter for a soft-tossing bullpen arm and a young prospect that can’t find the plate. Based on the position the Jays want to be in, this was a total loss.

        2
        Reply
    • yeasties

      3 months ago

      Their reliever reclamation projects all seem to break down shortly after being traded from Seattle, so I’d avoid trading with the Mariners

      Reply
      • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

        3 months ago

        Trent Thornton doesn’t even out the reliever casualties between the two clubs? Hey we traded for an injured Yimi Garcia too and just got a handful of innings. Then there’s the Casey Lawrence loan-lease for mop-up duty. Fun fun! (And the Mariners are now in the midst of the Zach Pop experience.)

        Reply
    • smuzqwpdmx

      3 months ago

      Relievers are like that whether you overuse them or not. There’s a reason they never get long contracts.

      Reply
    • myaccount2

      3 months ago

      I’m assuming you mean one good year in Toronto? He had two good years in Seattle.

      Reply
      • MagRupe

        3 months ago

        He did not. Went to LA on a pillow contract after his FA year in Seattle

        Reply
  2. sad tormented neglected mariners fan

    3 months ago

    Come back to Seattle! I want him and topa back

    3
    Reply
    • Canuckleball

      3 months ago

      Wouldn’t be the worst place for him to try to rebound.

      Reply
  3. hoof hearted

    3 months ago

    “Jerry depoto on line 2…”

    1
    Reply
  4. Cardinals are good

    3 months ago

    Hopefully the cardinals sign him to a minors deal

    Reply
  5. Cardinals are good

    3 months ago

    Mariners should’ve traded for him for casey lawrence

    Reply
  6. its_happening

    3 months ago

    The trade to make was Swanson for a couple minor leaguers, not your cleanup hitter when you are trying to win a World Series. When you do not have a viable replacement (think Delgado replacing Olerud or Olerud replacing McGriff), you could not make that trade. The Jays had to keep one of Teoscar or Gurriel, and trade the other. Not both. Not when you do not have AAA-ready hitters at the time ready to pump 25-30 bombs a year.

    1
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Braves Sign Charlie Morton

    MLB Approves Patrick Zalupski As New Rays Owner

    Pirates To Promote Hunter Barco

    Brewers Place Brandon Woodruff On 15-Day Injured List

    2025-26 Qualifying Offer Projected To Be Around $22MM

    Tigers Designate Charlie Morton For Assignment

    Will Smith Suffering From Hairline Fracture In Hand

    Tylor Megill, Reed Garrett Recommended For Tommy John Surgery

    Astros Place Yordan Alvarez On Injured List

    Astros To Activate Isaac Paredes

    Clayton Kershaw To Retire After 2025 Season

    Lucas Giolito Converts Club Option To Mutual Provision

    Yordan Alvarez To Miss Time With “Pretty Significant” Ankle Sprain

    Giants To Promote Bryce Eldridge

    Mets Moving Sean Manaea To The Bullpen

    Blue Jays To Promote Trey Yesavage For MLB Debut

    Dodgers Place Will Smith On Injured List

    Dipoto: Mariners Interested In Re-Signing Josh Naylor

    Anthony Volpe Playing Through Partial Labrum Tear

    Orioles Promoted Mike Elias Prior To 2025 Season

    Recent

    Poll: Jack Flaherty’s Player Option

    Braves Sign Charlie Morton

    Marlins Designate Derek Hill For Assignment

    Braves Claim Joel Payamps, Designate Connor Seabold For Assignment

    MLB Approves Patrick Zalupski As New Rays Owner

    Trade Rumors Front Office Subscriber Chat Transcript

    Pirates To Promote Hunter Barco

    Luke Weaver Open To Rotation Opportunities In Free Agency

    Submit Your Questions For This Week’s Episode Of The MLBTR Podcast

    The Opener: AL Playoff Race, Padres, Brewers, Pitchers’ Duel

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version