The Cubs are on the hunt for rotation upgrades — a fact that’s both been widely reported and publicly confirmed by president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer. It’s easy enough to see why. Ace Justin Steele was lost for the season due to elbow surgery back in April. Shota Imanaga is returning to the rotation tomorrow, his first start since a hamstring injury sent him to the 15-day IL back on May 4. Javier Assad hasn’t pitched this year due to multiple oblique strains. Young right-hander Ben Brown was optioned to Triple-A yesterday amid ongoing struggles. Swingman Colin Rea, moved into the rotation during that injury deluge, has begun to struggle after initially excelling in a starting role.
Few teams have decided on a deadline direction yet, but Chicago has already been in contact with some clubs that know they’ll operate as sellers. Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reports that the Cubs have inquired on Marlins right-handers Sandy Alcantara and Edward Cabrera. USA Today’s Bob Nightengale writes that the Cubs also have some interest in Pirates righty Mitch Keller (as well as closer David Bednar). He adds that they’ve kept tabs on A’s righty Luis Severino before quickly downplaying the possibility that the Athletics would actually trade the veteran right-hander in the first season of his three-year, $67MM contract.
There are surely other names on the Cubs’ radar, but the early connections are notable. That’s particularly true on the heels of 670 The Score’s Bruce Levine reporting earlier this week that the Cubs are being aggressive and are hoping to push something across the finish line well ahead of next month’s deadline — perhaps even within the next week to ten days (audio link). Levine suggested that Alcantara was not the likeliest target and that someone a bit more under the radar was more probable.
The Marlins duo stand as obvious trade candidates. Alcantara entered the season as perhaps the most plain-as-day trade candidate in the sport. The 2022 NL Cy Young winner is in his first full season back from a Tommy John procedure that cost him all of the 2024 campaign. He’s earning $17MM this year and next, and the Marlins hold a $21MM club option for the 2027 season.
Alcantara, 29, didn’t do his trade candidacy any favors early on. He pitched to an awful 8.47 ERA through the end of May, striking out only 16.9% of opponents against a 12.2% walk rate along the way. He’s since shown signs of life. Alcantara has pitched 23 innings over his past four starts and allowed a total of seven runs (2.74 ERA) on 18 hits and five walks with 19 strikeouts (20.4 K%, 5.4 BB%). His 46.4% grounder rate in that time is comfortably better than average but a ways from its 53.4% peak. His fastball velocity hasn’t been much of a question all year, averaging better than 97 mph — 97.6 mph over his past four starts. That’s down a slight bit from his 98 mph average pre-surgery, but not by an alarming measure.
If Alcantara can continue distancing himself from that bleak two-month start and continue resembling his 2022 self, the chances of a trade will only increase. Every club with even a glimmer of postseason contention would love to add the two-time All-Star with his ability to its staff, particularly when considering the relatively affordable nature of his salary under the terms of the contract extension he signed a few years back. The asking price on Alcantara figures to be steep, however, and the Marlins may wish to hold him a bit longer to allow him to continue posting improved results and further drum up interest. If that’s the case, the timing may not align with Chicago’s more urgent push for a starting pitcher.
Cabrera, 27, isn’t as well-known as his teammate but was a highly touted pitching prospect himself prior to his big league debut. He’s shown glimpses of that potential in the past, but the 2025 campaign thus far has the makings of a possible breakout. In 59 innings, Cabrera has pitched to a 3.81 ERA with a 24.8% strikeout rate, a 10.2% walk rate and a 42.9% ground-ball rate. He’s averaging a career-best 96.7 mph on his four-seamer, has ramped the usage of his sinker up to a career-high 23% and is throwing more sliders than he has in the past two seasons.
Cabrera entered the 2025 season with 2.147 years of major league service. That was enough for him to reach Super Two designation, meaning he’s already gone through the arbitration process once, coming away with a modest $1.95MM salary. He’ll be owed a raise in each of the next three offseasons before hitting free agency following the 2028 season. He’s nowhere near as established as Alcantara or Keller — Cabrera has never even pitched 100 innings in a big league season — but his power arsenal, low salary and that remaining club control hold obvious appeal.
Turning to the Pirates, Keller is a sensible enough trade candidate, even though the Bucs probably aren’t in a rush to trade him. He’s only in the second season of a five-year, $77MM contract. The former second-round pick and top prospect is earning $15MM this year, and that extension (which tacked four years and $71.6MM onto his previously agreed upon arbitration salary for 2024) calls for salaries of $16.5MM, $18MM and $20MM in the three subsequent seasons.
Keller has appeared in at least 31 games in each of the past three seasons and is on pace to do so again in 2025. He’s started 16 games and totaled 94 innings with a 4.02 ERA, an 18.5% strikeout rate, a 6.1% walk rate and a 45.5% ground-ball rate. That strikeout rate is down from 23.5% he posted in 2023-24, but Keller is getting more grounders and issuing fewer walks than in those seasons. His velocity is down about a half-mile per hour from last year, with his average four-seamer clocking in at 93.9 mph and his average sinker at 92.8 mph. Keller has made some alterations to his pitch selection, throwing his sinker less and his slider at a career-high 34.9% rate. He’s also ditched his cutter and is reincorporating a changuep that he effectively shelved for 2024.
The possibility of an intradivision trade with a player of this caliber is fascinating, if only because it rarely occurs. The Pirates are deep in pitching talent, however, with Paul Skenes anchoring the rotation and Bubba Chandler — perhaps MLB’s top pitching prospect — seemingly ready to go in Triple-A. Bailey Falter is a relative veteran at this point, and the Pirates have a deep stock of additional young arms including Mike Burrows, Braxton Ashcraft, Thomas Harrington and Hunter Barco. Jared Jones underwent Tommy John surgery this summer but looked promising as a rookie last year. Johan Oviedo was a solid fourth starter in 2023 before his own Tommy John procedure. Veteran Andrew Heaney is eating innings in the rotation right now but seems like a lock to be traded before the deadline if he’s healthy.
Whether that depth would be enough to persuade the Pirates to part with Keller is an open question. This is Ben Cherington’s sixth year as Pirates general manager, and the Bucs haven’t won more than 76 games in a season during his tenure. Trading Keller would be more akin to the large-scale rebuilding moves made earlier in his tenure, but if a trade partner were to give up immediate MLB talent, it wouldn’t necessarily indicate a step back. Dealing from a position of strength and then using the money that had been earmarked for Keller to bolster other areas of the staff could make good sense. Of course, given the Pirates’ history, it can’t be assumed that owner Bob Nutting would just pump Keller’s salary right back into the payroll by way of offseason free-agent signings or trade acquisitions.
From the Cubs’ stance, Keller or Alcantara would fit nicely into the payroll (and Cabrera even more so, of course). They’re veterans on the sort of mid-range contracts Cubs ownership seems to prefer with regard to pitchers.
The Cubs only have about $123MM in guarantees on the books next year, though that number will almost certainly rise to $138MM when the team picks up a three-year club option on Imanaga. Even still, that leaves plenty of room for Keller, Alcantara or just about any other rotation target. Assuming that Imanaga option is exercised, he and Dansby Swanson will be the only players signed beyond 2026. The Cubs obviously hope to extend Pete Crow-Armstrong and re-sign Kyle Tucker, but those goals arguably only increase the importance of finding some cost-effective ways to round out the starting staff.
The Pirates would be stupid to get rid of any pitchers. They could have a rotation of Skenes Jones,Chandler, Ashcroft Harrington and others. They would absolutely be ready to compete.
They still need hitters. I agree they should avoid trading those 5 though. Keller, Falter, and Heaney they should look to move if they can get a good return. Get a few good hitters to go with that pitching and you could win the central next yr!
They need at least 2 high obp bats, and a true power threat first.
Notably, you didn’t include Keller in that list, so they could get rid of him.
The Pirates needed to make loans just to be able to have a $90 million payroll this year in the bad Pittsburgh baseball market.
They should listen to trade offers on any and all of their players. If the trade would make the team better, do it – no matter who it is.
If the Pirates got a dollar for the amount of times you mention the so-called “bad Pittsburgh market” based on your comment history up to this point, Bob Nutting would be in the top 5 richest owners.
“[T]he #Pirates brought in only $84.8 million in ticket and concessions revenue at PNC Park in 2024. That’s one of the worst figures in MLB.”
— BaseballAmerica.com
PGH is one of the worst markets for baseball in MLB.
45 years of losing will do that
It was just as bad of a market 45 years ago.
When the Pirates won the World Series in 1979, they were tenth of the twelve National League teams in attendance.
The Pirates played the Reds that year in the NL Championship Series. The Pirates drew 1.4 million fans that season. The Reds drew 2.3 million, in a similar size market.
The Pirates’ player payroll is covered by MLB shared money. Anything on top of that covers FO and minor leaguers and lines ownership’s pockets.
It’s a small market, not a bad market.
The Pirates LOST money last year and were 26th in total revenue in 2023 (including revenue sharing).
dkpittsburghsports.com/team/site-stuff/feed?page=0…
Pittsburgh is a bad market for baseball.
Really good article with lots of work shown. However, $171.7M in “other costs” is very vague and open to shenanigans. All that to get a reported $2.2M (<1%) loss.
What about the money Nutting has made from revenue sharing???
Nutting took out loans during COVID, there’s no evidence that he did so in 2025. If your source is Dejan then you might want to look elsewhere. DK claims Nutting lost $2MM in 2024 yet he still made nearly 30 times that from revenue sharing alone.
Kovacevic included revenue sharing money as part of the Pirates total revenues in 2024, and still found that they lost money even with revenue sharing included.
In 2023, the Pirates were 26th of 30 in total revenue – with revenue sharing included.
d3data.sportico.com/MLBValuations2024/MLBVal.html
There is 50 years worth of evidence that Pittsburgh is a bad market for baseball.
Didn’t you know that DK knows more about finance than Forbes? Idiotic
;Kovacevic did a thorough four-month-long investigation of the Pirates finances and had access to their financial records.
Forbes did not.
I see that your mates who have been whining and moaning and squealing like children about Nutting daily -for nearly two decades – STILL can’t get me out of their heads, even though I’ve been gone for a month.
Pathetic.
You always start that stuff about bad market!! You need new game! They have great fans,alot that don’t live there! They have good following around country. Everyone doesn’t go to stadium.
He needs attention.
Not sure what it would cost in terms of prospect haul but the Cubs should go after both Alcantara and Cabrera. They’re clearly in win now mode, yet their rotation starts with a guy that’s out for the year and a guy coming off of a near 2 month absence. After that it’s Boyd, and Taillon who are far from the most reliable arms, Horton who has a ton of upside but is still in his first season and Rea who’s been pressed into service. Even if all of them remain healthy, which is a huge “if” they need more pitching depth and that’ll be true even when Steele comes back next year.
I agree that they don’t need just one- but two starters. Boyd and Horton are already over the number of innings pitched last year. Taillon has reverted to his usual up and down form. Brown, Assad are a ways away and no one in Triple A is wowing anybody. It’s hard to believe after trading for Tucker, this is what Hoyer felt was a playoff worthy plan. Yes, they’ve had some guys pitch well, but there is no depth or margin for error.
“No margin for error” is an excellent summation of the precipice this team looms over at the start of each season these past few years.
If time allowed, and they could get a decent reliever cheaper – I’d find it interesting to see if Brad Keller could be stretched out.
I’m leaving Keller EXACTLY where he is. I might entertain that idea next spring but certainly not now. Before it’s all over he might be the Closer.
A $20MM closer is a horrendous use of money in Pitt
I’d rather get Lugo instead of Keller anyway. And Bednar was a nice option once but now he’s just as easy to blow up as succeed. Shouldn’t take major piece to get him and if it is , Run, Don’t walk in the other direction. Neely for Bednar should be plenty.
I still hold the position that the Cubs should not trade Caissie until the Kyle Tucker situation plays itself out. The Cubs could trade Ballesteros and some other guys the Pirates might be interested in. Would Alcantara, Ballesteros, Neely and lower level P be enough to get Keller and Bednar? IDK if that works or not but it might be interesting to see all those guys playing against each other for the next few years.
If I were the Cubs I might entertain the idea of trading Tucker if I could get a lot more than the compensation pick they’ll get at the end of the year and giving Caissie his promotion and see how that works. That would take a POBO with guts to do that and we have lame duck Jed so I don’t see that happening. Something will happen and I pretty much guarantee you I won’t like it.
so you would be willing to trade arguably the best offensive player on the team/mvp (PCA is killing it, but Tucker has shown years of success) and roll the dice with an untested rookie? I read some doozies on this site, but wow…this might be the best yet.
Well I wouldn’t have been dumb enough to trade for him in the first place because everybody on the planet knew he was going into FA and especially his team the Astros who found a sucker in Hoyer who has no common sense. See shiny-want shiny- Must have the PRECIOUS. So now he has a guy he knows he can’t re sign so I would but since Hoyer is in the last year of his contract I know he won’t. So read into my comment what you want but whatever Hoyer gets at the deadline doesn’t really make them a WS team. At best it was always a Division winning team. They would have to trade him to a team willing to pay him so the options would be very limited but yeah I’d be looking. But Hoyer won’t.
I agree Mike. Cubs should not trade ONKC unless they are 100% all in on re-signing Tucker.
Depends on self-scouting. If Cubs internally believe Caissie (enormous K rate in minors red flag) is fools’ gold and can get multiple years control of a good SP, that door shouldn’t be closed even if Tucker gets his crazy $ elsewhere. Whether such an available high end SP exists fitting that criteria is a bigger question.
I agree they shouldn’t trade Caissie until the Tucker situation plays out, but I really don’t think Caissie should be inserted as a full-time starter until the chance for post-season contention has played itself out, either.
Trading Tucker right now is one of those batshit crazy ideas that has an incongruously pragmatic flair to it. Like, I see where you’re going with it. Just doesn’t seem wise. Cubs are in first place, have a real shot at the post-season, and clearly Tucker is a major contributor to that change in fortunes. And after a painful Cubs lifetime of wait-til-next-year, I am far less concerned with whether Cubs lose Tucker to free agency next year and entirely focused on the Cubs winning with Tucker this year. I have serious doubts that current ownership is ever going to invest in a Cubs team in a way necessary to establish a culture of winning.
100% agree. In fact, here’s an unpopular opinion so feel free to flame away:
Cubs should either do nothing at the deadline, or sell anyone that’s not PCA, Horton, Palencia, Hodge, Amaya, or Busch. I know Happ and Suzuki aren’t going anywhere due to the NTC’s, and I doubt anyone’s desperate enough to take Swanson’s contract. The Cubs are NOT winning the world series this year; they don’t have the starting pitching to dominate a playoff run, and the offense is quickly regressing, They’re not going to re-sign Tucker after the season, so why get rid of controllable young talent just for a feel-good “Hey, at least we tried” early round playoff exit. And speaking of playoffs, that’s hardly a sure thing right now. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a die-hard Cubs fan and I really want to be wrong, but I’m not.
But no worries, Hoyer doesn’t have the balls to do anything other than small, mid-market additions and bullpen patches.
I think you under estimate Hoyers ability to screw things up but otherwise agree with you. Swanson also has a NMC so you can’t move him either unless he wants to go and his wife plays soccer here and is expecting so that’s not happening either.
Can keep Alcantara, Pirates dont need a C, can keep Ballesteros but Wiggins, Kipp, Pedro Ramirez and Ivan Brethowr will land you Keller and Bednar.
Sandy Alcantara or Edward Cabrera is a Cubs dream I hope doesn’t come true.
Wiggins going nowhere.
Remember your Cam Smith is going to be the starting third baseman for the Cubs in ’26?
And he should have been.
Wiggins is on the very short list of untouchables.
No he is not. I would put PCA, Shaw, and Horton in that list. Caissie is a safe card. But with Suzuki getting half of the time in RF it lessens the chance that Tom will pay the 500M needed to retain Tucker. So add Caissie to the no touch list. Tom will want a replacement in RF to platoon with Suzuki
Alcantara is interesting. If he is over the hump in his return from TJ he fits the bill as a needed RH arm to slot between Shota and Boyd this year.
He better be.
Wiggins, Kipp, Brethowr, Ramirez and Ballesteros for Alcantara and a BP arm. I think its a good trade. I think Alcantara is still a top ten starter in MLB even with his slow return from TJ, all his stuff is as good as it was before the surgery.
Im hoping Miami keeps him and doesn’t trade Cabrera either would like to see Miami beat the Braves, Phillies and the Mets next season. But I like Ivan Brethowr a lot and he could be a player that could fit in with the Marlins.
I think they can win next season if they keep Alcantara. How about Brethowr for Cal Quantrill? Quantrill is pitching good.
You must have a really good dealer.
Take Verlander
Wouldn’t Gallen be an obvious candidate as well? Contract year and dbacks aren’t competitive with the amount of injuries.
He’s having a tough year
Ya he is not a strong rental option. I could see Jed trying to low-ball him next year on a 1 year plus deal. Kelly makes more sense if you go there.
German Marquez of the Rockies is well on the way to becoming his former solid pitcher self now that Bud Black has departed with his ancient pitching philosophies.
As this is his walk year, the Rockies are most likely inclined to grant this loyal pitcher an opportunity to get back to the post-season. He will serve some team quite well. Marquez is a fan favorite in Colorado, and we’d miss him, but all know he deserves better.
The Rockies should be shopping anyone not signed long term. They are the Rockies so they will probably hold onto everyone for no apparent reason.
Ny followed Chicagos lead last night. Socialism is taking over. Yes
Good to see the other team from Chicago ban the fan that taunted Marte.
Forst can’t trade Severino or the A’s dip below the threshold and Fisher has to face a dispute over not using Revenue Sharing to improve the team.
One crazy part with some of these pitchers is the fact the the cubs could have drafted some of them as they were 2nd 3rd rounders etc so one has to wonder why are the cubs so terrible at drafting past the 1st round ? 2nd why does this seem like we are right back at 2017 looking to trade for a starter and they all seem no better then a Jose Quintana, I say look at someone like Sale . Years ago the cubs had a chance to trade for Justin Verlander but didn’t as they were worried about miles and age and that was a bad call as JV went on to a 73 & 28 record with the astros so why not try for sale
I don’t know about that. Hodge was a 13th round pick, Steele was like 5th round.
Everyone remembers the crap drafts and crap trades but forgets the Dempster for Hendricks or Feldman for Arrieta or Baez for PCA trades. Sometimes the bad outweighs the good, sometime the opposite.
Getz likes to trade, so the “hot hand” of Houser crosstown is foreseeable as a warmup deal soon ahead of Cubs pursuing a better SP difference maker in late July. That wouldn’t require any notable prospects as they try to minimize its current rough patch.
The Cubs should seriously look at the strikeout and walk numbers of both Alcantara and Cabrera because both numbers for both of them aren’t very good so it would be a big mistake for the cubs to give up anything for those numbers.
Agreed @charles!
Cubs should just send Bendix a check for $500k in international pool money or a Competitive balance pick in the year 2035 for both Alcantara and Cabrera. Its only fair.
Can we remove Swanson out of number 5 batting position to 7,8,9? And permanently.’?