Thirteen players have received a qualifying offer this year, reports Jeff Passan of ESPN. The list is as follows:
- Kyle Tucker, OF, Cubs
- Kyle Schwarber, OF/DH, Phillies
- Bo Bichette, SS/2B, Blue Jays
- Framber Valdez, LHP, Astros
- Dylan Cease, RHP, Padres
- Ranger Suarez, LHP, Phillies
- Edwin Diaz, RHP, Mets
- Zac Gallen, RHP, D-backs
- Shota Imanaga, LHP, Cubs
- Michael King, RHP, Padres
- Trent Grisham, OF, Yankees
- Gleyber Torres, 2B, Tigers
- Brandon Woodruff, RHP, Brewers
This year’s QO is valued at $22.025MM. All 13 players will have until Nov. 18 to decide whether to accept that one-year offer or decline and become a free agent. They can spend that time gauging the open market to determine interest in their services. If a player accepts the QO, he’ll be treated as a free agent signing and thus will be ineligible to be traded without his consent until June 15 of next year. If he declines, any team that signs him will be subject to draft and/or international bonus forfeitures, depending on its revenue-sharing and luxury tax status.
The bulk of the list was generally expected. Every recipient other than Torres and Imanaga was pegged as likely or a no-doubter to receive the QO on MLBTR’s annual lists of qualifying offer previews for position players and for pitchers. Torres was viewed as something of a long shot, at least on the MLBTR staff. He’s coming off a nice season in Detroit but struggled through a poor finish — perhaps in part due to injury — and wasn’t hit with a QO last offseason when coming off a comparable year at the plate in the Bronx.
Imanaga was listed as a borderline call on our preview as well. The Cubs declined a three-year, $57.75MM option on Imanaga last week. He subsequently declined a $15.25MM player option (which came with an additional player option at $15.25MM) — effectively opting out of a remaining two years and $30.5MM. The Cubs are banking on Imanaga also turning away one year at just over $22MM after turning down that remaining $30.5MM in guaranteed money.
The qualifying offer is determined each year by taking the average of the game’s 125 highest-paid players. We’ve already covered the penalties that each team would face for signing a qualified free agent, as well as the compensation each club would get for losing a qualified free agent to another team.
Among the notable free agents to not receive a qualifying offer are Lucas Giolito, Robert Suarez, Devin Williams and Jorge Polanco. Giolito might have received one had it not been for a late elbow issue that ended his season. Suarez has been excellent and just opted out of the remaining two years and $16MM on his contract, but he’ll be 35 next year. The Padres have been reducing payroll in recent seasons and likely didn’t want to risk Suarez locking in that weighty one-year sum. Williams would have received a QO with a typical season, but he struggled throughout much of the season’s first four months before a dominant finish. Polanco enjoyed a terrific rebound campaign but is 32 years old and was limited to DH work for much of the season due to ongoing injury issues.
The qualifying offer grants each of these free agents the chance at a notable one-year payday, though the majority of them will reject without much thought. Players like Tucker, Bichette, Schwarber, Valdez, Cease, Suarez and Diaz are likely to see comparable or larger (much larger, in Tucker’s case) salaries on multi-year deals in free agency. Even players like Grisham, who probably won’t land a $22MM annual value over multiple years, are still likely to reject. Major league free agents typically — though not always — prioritize long-term earning over short-term, higher-AAV pacts. A three- or four-year deal worth $14-16MM per year, for instance, is typically viewed as preferable to accepting one year at a higher rate.
There’s risk in declining the offer, of course. Teams are more reluctant to sign players who’ll cost them valuable draft picks and/or notable portions of their hard-capped bonus pool for international amateurs. Every offseason, there are a handful of free agents whose markets are weighed down by the burden of draft pick compensation. That typically applies to the “lower end” of the QO recipients. For top stars like Tucker, Bichette, etc. — draft/international forfeitures are simply considered the cost of doing business and don’t tend to have much (if any) impact on the player’s earning power.

OMG. what are the yankees thinking. i hope he doesn’t take it. and wants a longer deal
He’s not taking it. The outfield free agent market consists of Tucker, Bellinger, Bader, and Grisham. After that it’s a lot of question marks and hope.
Grisham is just as much a question mark as the rest. Any team signing him and expecting another 34 Home Run season is deceiving themselves
I don’t think anyone expects another 34 homeruns. They just expect him to be better than the flotsam that is guys like Conforto, Hays, Kelenic, and Slater. There is no depth in the outfield market.
I never would have guessed Grisham hit 34 hr. how did I miss that this season?
True on the slim market but giving up a pick to sign him drastically reduces his value.
I think he ends up accepting
There’s worse things than having his glove and righty splits on a 1 year deal.
I wish they had posted one to Williams too.
I saw someone say he will sign with someone 1 year 10 million lol. I would be pumped if rangers did 3 years 50 million.
@mlb
If Grishy do a 1 year deal he’d be doing the Yanks a favor. It’s not like he had success out of no where. He was a 1st round pick. He did have moments of success previously. The worst thing that can Halen is they waste money on a 1 year deal. However, I’m sure Grishy will be even more motivated to have a great 2026 so he can cash in next off-season if he decides to accept it.
Chuckled at can Halen.
I don’t see much of a market for Grisham with a QO and no much track record. I see 36MM-40MM/3 Years with no QO.
He is calling Yankees right now 22MM for one?
Gallen is in the other line. What a better way to reestablish his value, stay home and reenter next year seeking the 25MM-30MM per, that he does not has this year.
Grisham has a history of good D, and absolutely no hitting
To be fair to him, that’s a scouting report he could use on a dating app as well
Jsk, well played sir. Thanks for the laugh
It’s an interesting move, but not unexpected. Most speculation had the Yankees extending the QO. Many fans didn’t want to, but replacing Grisham won’t be easy. Spencer Jones is not the answer at this stage. I’d rather see Jones serve as the 4th OFer and see if he can force himself into the lineup. Depending on him is way more risky than Grisham.
Maybe their goal is to bring in another CFer, but at minimum, they’re could be hoping he accepts so they have one spot covered and can negotiate from a position of strength in trades and potential free agents. His underlying numbers indicate his 2025 season was not a fluke. He also surprisingly hit poorly at Yankee Stadium, so there is room for improvement. Last, if he doesn’t accept, they get a draft pick. I don’t see much downside here, if any at all.
This is probably correct. The worst that happens is they overpaid for Grisham, they fill a position, and they keep the player for the year. He wouldn’t be the first guy the Yankees overpaid…
The Yankees are notoriously stingy with QOs, so that’s another reason this is interesting. They don’t hand them out easily. Maybe their preference is not to have him come back, but they’re assessment is he’ll have a good market and they’ll get the pick. I actually believe he will have quite a bit of interest.
Woodruff, Imanaga and Grisham should all take the QO in my opinion. They will struggle to find a multi year deal and can bet on themselves rebounding and if not will make off with 22M. The others have less to prove and should get multi year deals including Gleyber
Have to imagine he is going to take it.
Teams aren’t going to want to give up a pick to sign him
like it matters… the Yankees can sign another $22m player if they want to.
Torres is the only mild surprise to me on the list receiving. I thought he was a close call.
Woodruff is a bit of a surprise to me, and I wonder if he accepts it
Hope so. His health would make a longer-term deal risky for another team until he can get through an entire season. And he has only played for the Brewers — loves the organization, and vice versa.
I wish the love of the team, the town, the fans etc. made a difference, but I still think you may be right. A very solid ‘prove it’ year could very well result in a better contact for him next year than he could find now.
Offering the QO to Woodruff signals 2 things loud and clear — MKE believes Woodruff is poised to have a monster season and they are raising payroll for the first time in years.
This team with a rotation of Woodruff-Peralta-Misiorowski-Patrick-Priester-Henderson-Gasser-Ashby and an offseason to possibly improve an offense last season that was 3rd in runs scored is poised to challenge for a WS title.
Wouldn’t say the Brewers will be raising payroll. They are almost $50 million under their $137 million 2025 payroll so will need multiple signings to even get to last year’s number.
Milwaukee would be fine if Woodruff accepts. Team is sitting on extra money from the NLCS playoff run.
If Woodruff accepts I firmly believe Milwaukee will try to move him or Peralta. As a fan for years this is the MO. I don’t believe this is a draft pick situation as much as they believe they can get a nicer package than the ortiz/hall for Burnes was. 1 year of Peralta at 8 million may get them a bigger haul than the one year of Burnes at 15 million did. Burnes is the better pitcher but, in a scenario that Woodruff accepts their are many more teams in play for Peralta’s 1 year 8 million commitment. Could hold both but I see No scenario in which both Peralta and Woodruff are on the opening day roster together.
Shota also. He most likely accepts
No chance. He’s homer-prone but otherwise is a solid 3/4 starter. Someone will give him a 3 or 4 year deal @ 15-17M per.
Exactly. He wants a contract in the neighborhood of 45-60m. If he takes the offer and stinks he won’t get anything next off-season.
If he takes the 1-year deal, he can go back to Japan if there’s a lockout.
I totally missed Shota. I am very surprised they issued him one. But I’m thinking they may have some insight on him seeking something longer and feel good about him not taking it
Not really from a Harris’ perspective either:
A,) Torres rejects the QO and the Tigers get a Comp B pick before the 3rd round.
Or,
B.) Torres takes the offer, which falls in line with his short term contract approach.
Either way, the way Harris does dealings, this is a win-win. They either get Torres for another year, or have a fairly high draft pick to restock the farm system.
Torres accepting a 1 year/$22mm deal ahead of a walk out would be a huge win for the Tigers.
I would believe Torres accepts the QO as it’s a 50% raise over his 20205 Salary and he’ll be a feee agent in 27 without a QO attached. Makes decent $$$ this year with another prove it deal heading into FA again
I think that would be the wise move for Torres as well. The QO will be a millstone around Torres’ neck.
Assuming Torres accepts (I’d be shocked if he didn’t), I think they’re going to need to make a trade to clear up the major log jam on the infield, I could see Colt Keith being traded away. I think he’s defensively limited to 2B, where he is blocked by Torres (who is distinctly better than Keith). Keith is too good to come off the bench but he doesn’t really have a position to get him regular playing time (and 3B on the regular does not seem realistic for him). I think it would be smart to trade him for a player who fills a positional need who has similar team control.
I thought Colt looked decent at 3B last year when they finally let him get some reps in a row over there. I’ve read he has a case of the “yips” on pop-ups at 3B. Is that true? His range at 2B is limited and he’s clumsy at 1B.
Keith has played better at 3B then he has at 2B. He played almost equal time at the 2 positions this season and was much better at 3B.
They had Baez playing in OF often, when hes out there they are solidified at 1B/2B if Torres is resigned. There really isn’t a logjam.
2027? The lost season!
I do wonder what impact a potential lockout will have on how players approach free agency this offseason.
The Imanaga and Torres ones seem the most likely to be taken by the player given how they faltered down the stretch.
I agree but would add Grisham based on a short track record. Another great platform year and no QO attached would really help his case for a long term deal
Yanks had to off him IMO because they can’t afford to loose both he and Belli.
I guess i should have clarified and added the two that the team hopes they don’t accept. If he accepts the Yanks would be cool with that I imagine.
Yeah, these are the 2 I would have as most likely
The Cubs certainly didn’t want the NTC attached to the three year team option. I could see them offering Imanaga 2/40 with only a NTC for 2026.
if he accepts there is no NTC. He just takes the 22M and Jed could flip him after if he wanted to
If he accepts he can’t be traded until June at the earliest
If he accepts a QO I believe he’d need to remain with the Cubs through at least midseason.
Have to wait a certain amount of time after after accepting.
I would at most give him a partial no trade clause. Let him pick 10 teams that he can block a trade too
I was thinking a full NTC for 2026 (because if they are sellers at the deadline there are much bigger problems, and Happ, Suzuki, Hoerner, and Kelly would all get traded first). Then no NTC for 2027 after the lockout.
Happ won’t ever be traded because he’ll never waive his NTC. The Cubs need to extend Hoerner for life. Suzuki also has a full ntc. I don’t see him waiving it either
Woodruff and Grisham would be smart to take it. Woodruff had more long term success but has been oft injured recently. Grisham will be hard pressed to find a suitor for more given his defense has fallen back and he had just 9 doubles on the year
I know Grisham had a career year, but I can’t imagine anyone paying him more than 22 million a year.
They don’t have to. A three- or four-year deal worth $15-16MM per season would still be preferable to one year at 22.
Would it really though? If I were offered the choice between a 1/22 and a 4/60 deal, I would probably take the shorter deal. All he would have to beat is 3/38 NEXT year in order to come out ahead. It’s a gamble, but it’s a gamble where you are banking $22 million this year regardless. And you would spend next season in the same strong lineup as this year. And next year you would have no chance of a qualifying offer.
He put up below-average offensive numbers his past three seasons prior to this one. The outfield market is very thin this off-season. This is his chance to cash in and he’s going to do it.
Call me crazy, but I’m locking in the $60 MILLION DOLLARS no question, especially when his career earnings are “only” in the $13 million range to date.
It’s not. Grisham’s underlying stats show that his season wasn’t a fluke. I would be concerned with his declined defense.
Yeah, but the only money “locked in” right now is the $22 million. There’s no guarantee he’ll get the offer you’re suggesting. He’s had 1 good season (2025) in his career, so it has to be tempting to take that guaranteed salary. He can always seek a 3 year deal in 2027 too…if he replicates this season’s numbers. I’m not holding my breath on that, though.
The only thing he can lock in for sure is the $22M. The alternative might be likely but not a certainty.
Good luck to you, but I disagree.
There is no such thing as a certainty in life other than death. Even if he signs a 4/60 deal, he will likely lose about 25% of that during a work stoppage. It’s called betting on yourself. If someone is willing to offer me $22 million this year and I am only 29 years old coming off the best year of my career, why wouldn’t I think I can do better than a little $12 million a year next year when I am still only 30?
YBC I’m not so worried about his defense. He easily passes the eye test and that’s as good as any of the defensive metrics. Especially since the various metrics don’t agree with each other. He also had a hamstring issue he was dealing with.
Hey Mule, it’s Mark from JITH. How are you doing.
But that is under the assumption he doesn’t turn back into a pumpkin offensively or suffer a major injury. His agents have five days to gauge interest. I would say a lot of players will be seeking signing bonuses which get paid weather or not they strike and they can be paid out over the years nor all at once.
Because injuries that decimate performance are real. Extremely common.
What a better reason to accept the QO if he has only earn 13MM in 6 years he will be irresponsible not to take that, there is no 60MM? unless is for 8 years.
Here’s the thing, I don’t think the Yankees will play him everyday next season so he won’t be able to put up those numbers.
Hey Mark! Doing great. It’s nice to hear from you. Hope you and everyone at JiTH is doing well too.
And if he comes CLOSE to replicating his 2025 numbers, his value will skyrocket. If he returns to career averages, it’s unlikely his value will fall too far below the 3/38 number.
But he may pass on accepting in the HOPEs he gets far more than 4/60 after a career year. Presumably his agent will be unofficially trying to figure out numbers from other teams so he can make a somewhat educated guess.
I’m still in the mourning stage, haven’t wandered over since……. well you know ;-(
Sounds like he played the season for the FA contract where he’ll just get fat lazy have worse than replacement level play and enjoy what trying hard one sham season can bring.
The best example I can give now is Joc Pederson. He accepted the QO instead of seeking a multi year deal and he undoubtedly made more money that way. And he has basically stunk in 2 of 3 years since accepting the offer.
Not at 29 with a CF defense-first profile, I would think.
Wow Grisham
If he takes they can flip him in a trade. Maybe that’s already worked out. If he doesn’t they get a 4th round pick. Win win,
Can’t trade a player who accepts a QO until the following June.
I believe i read somewhere they can if he agrees to be traded
Yes, June 15th is the date
Most trades don’t happen until deadline day anyway, so the June date is kind of irrelevant. I don’t think there were any trades before July this year other than DFA trades.
Okay there was one trade two weeks before July.. My apologies for forgetting that one.
Quinn Priester
Arraez the year before. They happen but only a few.
No-brainers: Tucker, Valdez, Bichette, Schwarber, Cease, King, Suarez, Diaz
Made me go hmmm, but not overly shocked: Imanaga, Gallen, Grisham
Surprised: Torres, Woodruff
Woodruff is not a surprise.
Woodruff should be a surprise. Typical Milwaukee FO bias thinking. No problem paying Woodruff 22M (let alone 9M each year in 2024 & 2025), yet considering trading Peralta because he’s making 8M. Ridiculous!!
Bet they wouldn’t offer Peralta a 22M QO if it was him instead of Woodruff!
One WS appearance (over 40 years ago) in 55 years. The “tradition” and “culture” continues.
I agree that Woodruff is a surprise, but the comparison to Peralta is irrelevant. They aren’t considering moving Peralta to save the $8M, they would be doing it to get talent back for him in his walk year.
My point is the Brewers don’t treat certain types of players equally over the past 15-20 years.
To address your point, why not offer Peralta a contract extension at a higher salary instead of letting him walk? INSTEAD of possibly paying Woodruff 22M!! I’d rather have Peralta at 15-25M per season than Woodruff.
I’m not sure that you can get Peralta to sign for that range, and probably would take 6-8 years. But yes, locking in Peralta, if they could, would be a better use of resources.
Peralta will make far more in free agency than $25M. Look at his stats and he never misses a start.
I agree. Peralta would make more in free agency. Perhaps don’t let it reach that point. I think he would accept long term security on a “home” discount and wouldn’t mind staying in MKE for four to six more years @ 20-25M per year.
Point is if Woodruff had Peralta’s history and stats, the Brewers would probably offer Woodruff that kind of contract. I could be wrong?
He’s getting more than that per year, simple as that. The Brewers want the pick for Woodruff, if they were trying to sign him their MO would be to do that years ago when you could take advantage of him being further away from free agency.
The Brewers won “their” WS… they beat the Cubs. That’s all they’ll accomplish.
They’re not considering trading Peralta because he makes $8 million this year. They’re considering trading him because they don’t want to get in a bidding war for whatever contract he demands AFTER this year, and they want to maximize his value, if possible. They would 100% offer Peralta a QO in a similar position.
They did offer Peralta an extension. Peralta will certainly get a QO following the 2026 season.
Milwaukee has a rivalry with Chicago but that is just good natured fun. End of the day they command by far the best run organization in MLB given they occupy the smallest market.
The whole Peralta will be traded because Hader/Burnes/Williams were previously is just living off history. Brewers aren’t looking to trade Freddy, but a team is free to make an offer. Say a top 20 overall prospect+ was offered, it’d be foolish to not consider it. But the recent returns for the previous 3 aren’t anywhere near that value.
surprise if Milwaukee would offer it. Not that he was worth it.
Dumbest rule ….
Huh.
No Giolito? Im not sure im surprised or not. Makes me think there’s red Sox trainers maybe know more about that season ending arm injury than we do.
They have also stated a need to add a pitcher who “moves the needle” which Giolito is not, and him coming back at $22M makes that guy nearly impossible to fit into the salary.
For the price, at a 1 year deal if healthy, he’d make a heck of a #3…
Unfortunately, I’ve been getting nervous vibes about this offseason since the details of Duran’s deal came down.
They spent a bunch of time negotiating for a net $100k savings… unless he’s hurt he’s going to make those PA incentives, but, rather than just pick up the $8m option, how much effort must’ve gone into negotiations with the agent and player to save a pittance?
That makes me fear the pursestrings are going to be tightened this winter. I just hope that’s not the case.
The team makes *plenty* enough cash to have issued the QO and still get a #2/co-ace to pair with crochet…
Calling Giolito a #3 is quite generous, he’s a #4-5 who used to throw a lot of innings but has struggled with injuries since signing with Boston
GSF
The Sox as well as myself view him as a # 4 and did want to get locked into him for that price. If he was able to pitch well in the postseason a QO may have been warranted. Some team will sign him to a 1 year deal with incentives I assume. One thing the Sox seem to have in abundance is # 4/5 pitchers.
Here’s the thing… as an older fan, I too would like to think your #3 pitcher is better than Giolito.
The problem is, that’s not the reality anymore for SP in MLB. Average era is above 4 league wide, and your middle #3 starter should ideally be within small range above or below that average/median.
Here’s a link to all the SP in MLB who pitched at least 70 innings (a ridiculously low threshold as well, also reflecting realities of modern pitching).
fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?month=0&po…
Giolito ranked 41st in MLB in ERA in 2025, which, theoretically slots him as having performed overall somewhat like a #2 in results.
He also rated 77th in FIP, which again, is also inside a bracket of the middle 5th of mlb starters above 70 innings thrown.
Why I picked 70? An abysmally low number of SP even hit 100IP. I lowered the innings threshold till I got to a sample large enough to fill 150 rotation slots.
Pitching has dropped off that far across MLB.
You’ve got a handful of guys who are elite, then the drop-off is steep and fast compared to what an older fan remembers.
FWIW, in the pre-QO thread for giolito, I did argue he performs as often as a 4/5 level as a #2 guy….
But the idea that theres more than 90 starters better than him around the league pushing him into a 4/5 slot… unfortunately, there isn’t that much really good pitching to go around.
Am I crazy or did the Cubs kinda do Imanaga dirty here?
No, his team option had a NTC attached to it. After that horrible September, they can’t go along with a 3 year NTC even if they were ok with the salary (which was less than 22 AAV).
Imanaga can choose to accept the QO and go back out and get a 2/38 after next season and still be ahead.
How so?
They declined his option, saying they didn’t want his services… but now they are trying to get draft pick compensation if he signs elsewhere.
Not saying they did something wrong… but it does feel strange. Like a loophole in the QO system.
What’s clear is the Cubs didn’t want him at 3/57 and a NTC. He also didn’t want a 1/15. What loophole? Nothing has changed since the day he signed the Cubs deal.
Its not about not wanting his services, its about not wanting to be stuck with him on a NTC for 3 years as he ages at an elevated contract.
You’d argue extending the QO means they do want his services for the one season.
or Did Imanaga do himself dirty by struggling in the 2nd half?
Rhandome
No, because I think Shota will accept the QO
Thought Robert Suarez might get one, but Padres probably need to focus that money on the rotation.
no reason. They covered the closer in July.
I would think SD would use Mason Miller as their Closer, and use the money saved by Suarez leaving to try to replace Cease and King. Or move Miller to the rotation and sign someone like Fairbanks.
Suarez was never getting a QO.
I think Suarez is going to do really well in FA but there’s just no way they could risk allocating $22M to their bullpen with their roster construction
Woodruff Jersey saved from going to Goodwill! Shocked the Brewers would give the bearded one that kind of money!
Ill be surprised if woodruff accepts it. He can easily beat 22 million on a multi year deal. He even gets that with a pillow deal with an opt out.
I don’t think he gets more than that per year (probably less). If someone gives him 2-3 years he’d end up with more guaranteed overall, but I’m not sure how much more. Most predictions so far have him in the 2/25-3/40 range.
He wasnt saying he woukd get that PER YEAR, he meant over the course of a multi-year deal. Say he gets 15M per and 2 or 3 years. As the article states, most guys prefer a.multi-year contract with a lower AAV vs a.one year contract at a higher AAV.
Flahtery got 2/$35m w/ an opt out with worse stats and bigger injury concerns…
Right, but 2/30 is only $8M more than the qualifying offer and even if he completely blows up this year someone will give him more than 1/8 a year from now.
The first 7 players will almost certainly decline the QO. Gallen should probably accept the QO and hope for a better season in 2026. Imanaga is tough to figure out. If I were him, I’d decline the QO. King should definitely decline it. Grisham should decline it, because he may never have another season like 2025. This is his best chance to get a solid multi-year contract. Torres should probably decline too, as he should be able to get a multi-year deal due to a lack of top 2B available. Woodruff, like Gallen, should accept the QO and hope for a better 2026.
Just my opinions.
Woodruff’s QO is most confusing to be. I get what the Cubs did with Shota. They shed two years, risk paying a couple million more for one year, have a shot at getting a pick. No losses there. Woodruff got a ten million dollar buy-out. Thats over a net 12 million dollar difference. If he accepts, (I assume anyways), he gets 32 million from the Brewers for next year’s services.
Wooduff turned down his side of a $20 million mutual option for 2026, triggering the $10 million buyout.
For the Brewers’ decision on offering a QO, the buyout shouldn’t matter. The $10 million buyout is a sunk cost that’s paid to Woodruff no matter what.
Woodruff’s $10 million is part of his 2025 salary. not 2026
The last three on the list and Imanaga will accept the Qualifying Offer.
Wrong.
Looks like I was 100% correct.
Grisham, Woodruff, Galen and Imanaga surprise me. $22 m seems like an overpay.
Yanks should let Trent go and put the Martian in center and jones in left
Detroit did its part. It would be nice if Gleyber accepts it.
Grisham and Torres accept. Maybe Gallen. Those are my picks.
Grisham made himself a nice deal, no matter if he accepts or rejects the Yankees offer. His bat woke up enough to give a few years of future hope to his past several years of not realizing expectations.
Outrageous $ these guys get.
Don’t like it? Stop watching it. (Hint: People and fans pay to watch these guys, maybe start from there and think your way up).
Never said don’t like it. Just made a comment on how much these guy make.
Calm down.
It would be great if Torres accepts.
Torres made the lineup better in the first half when he was healthy.
Now go sign Bichette.
If McGonigle goes to 3B, where does Colt go? Surely McG isn’t ready for MLB SS. I also can’t see Tigers cutting bait with Javy & his $48M..
Makes me wonder if McGonigle is going to Toledo this year. Harris won’t waste a chance at the ROY draft pick by McGonigle not starting a season in MLB.
Is Colt getting moved?
Isn’t Bichette projected to be as much of a liability at SS as McGonigle? I hope that the Tigers sign a top FA pitcher (Valdez seems to be most appealing to me). And it will be interesting if the pursue Bregman if Torres accepts the QO (they tried hard to get him last year).
Gruß,
BSHH
A trade for Peralta would be nice. Michal King is a good target if he’s healthy.
Yes, you are correct: Bichette is supposed to be a liability at SS. I was thinking him rotating at 3B/2B/SS w/Javy at SS/CF & Colt at 3B, McKinstry backing up 3B/2B/SS/OF.
I seriously doubt Detroit will sign Bichette. I fear they’ll sign Old Man Bregman.
I wonder if they will do a time share at SS and CF again with Baez splitting with McGonigle and the ever injured Meadows.Keith can play 3B and NO Bregman! Or maybe they will upgrade with Bichette for 3B? Its going to be interesting.
I think the Cubs will be fine with whatever way Imanaga goes. He’ll either be expensive rotation depth, or he walks and it frees up money to use elsewhere.
There are quite a few candidates to accept here.
I could see Gallen, Torres, Woodruff, Imanaga and King accept as they are all coming off disappointing years or injury concerns making their long term prospects (especially with a QO attached limited).
Imanaga was one of the best pitchers in MLB just a year ago. I admit I didn’t watch all his starts down the stretch, but really surprises me that so many people think he’ll accept a QO, or even that he’s not worth one.
Tom Ricketts is cheap. He has no interest in paying high salaries during the impending lockout after the 2026 season ends.
Yes, he had a great year last year.. But he killed them in the second half and was unusable in the playoffs (Got bombed his one start). He’s lost velocity on his FB.
Letting him go was the smart play.
This year’s QO is valued at $22.025MM. Wow.
The average of the 125 highest salaries is that much. Wow.
Do you guys realize, the kids are out there joining gangs, selling drugs, shooting each other every night and day? All because they want.to afford to.go.to a game. How are they supposed to get to a game or take thier girl – and get decent seating – not hey, this is the best I could do, embarrassing seats.
Used to be able to pick up some cans, redeem them and get tickets to the ballgame. Now kids need to commit credit card fraud. How many cans does it take to get decent seats these days? Pretty much a full truck load.
Used to be, to see a game all you had to do was know how to climb a fence and run fast…..worse case scenario, a cop would threaten to billyclub you if you got caught. Maybe you would actually get smacked a couple times with the billyclub to teach you to run a little faster if you got caught too many times….and Now?
Cops are afraid to hit the kids with a billyclub…too terrified of being SUED! What is this country coming to, when a cop can’t even smack a kid around with a billyclub???? Instead the kids are taken downtown, finger printed, booked and sent downstream with a criminal record!
The kids of this generation are at a total disadvantage! No one is GIVING BACK TO THE COMMUNITY! It’s all talk, talk. All they do is talk talk- the owners, the Ivy League GMs, the agents and yes, the players and ESPECIALLY that faux birth certificate wielding commie, who devalues the American dollar each and every year.
The youth of America is facing an uphill battle.
When I read this I imagined it in Sam Kinisons voice. Very funny
Ticket resellers are the problem moreso than the ballpark themselves.
The low-end guys like Imanaga, Torres, and Grisham probably should just take the QO. Multi-year offers are only going to be made to the top-tier talents by the top-spending teams. Those guys are not going to be getting offers with guaranteed salaries for 2027, 2028, and beyond when a lockout is all but certain to follow the 2026 World Series.
Why should Imanaga or Torres take a QO? Shota would get close to that selling his rights to one of the other 29 (if not with more years guaranteed). Torres won’t hit that number but he’s going to get the years to make the difference worth missing. Guys like King, Grisham, and Woodruff should think about accepting.
He was seeking a 4 year deal last year. Don’t think he will want another 1 year deal. See him signing for slightly less AAV, but for a longer term, especially with labor contract up.
Look at you brewers! Showing some guts
Thank God these guys don’t have a say in determining the price of bread.
Do you think there is a lot of backroom/clandestine dealing between front offices and player agents going on right now about these numbers and options? Is it legal for a player’s agent to talk to all 29 other teams before accepting or rejecting the QO?
They’re free agents and not contracted with their former respective teams so it would not be considered tampering. The players and teams are free to have discussions.
Sabertooth: I was shouting “Amen!” Right up until you wrote this: “Instead the kids are taken downtown, finger printed, booked and sent downstream with a criminal record!”
If you’ve been paying attention you would see that no one gets a criminal record anymore… That’s the problem. No consequences in our society and no accountability. In the end, just blame it on the Dodgers payroll!
What on earth are you talking about. I’m a hiring manager, let me tell you something…1 in 3 Americans of adult age have a criminal record (1 in 4 of those have been found guilty of at least one felony). Not being able to get a good job is a hell of a consequence of getting in trouble.
i know Tucker is a good player and all, but hopefully the Dodgers pass. he was on the sign stealers, so he a non starter afaic. i’ll take a weed smoking sub .200 Bellinger instead. i have morals, dont judge
The Dodgers already employ Betts, and Tucker wasn’t in the league in 2017. You don’t have morals
so you admit the Red Sox cheated LA in 2018 too? i dont remember any investigations or proof but i have my suspicions. Tucker came up in 2018. he was in Houston’s farm system in 2017. Guilty. As. Charged.
when Tucker was brought up in 2018 they were all still doing that sht. that story didnt break until after the 2019 season.
Your morals are very weak, especially when you’re willing to bend them so easily while trying to act mightier than thou. Keep playing ignorant though, looks real good on you.
ok mr secret knowledge if you have something spill. your weak attack on mookie is still unsupported, and instead of addressing my argument against your bf Tucker you resort to name calling. not very convincing
After Bieber took his $16M option I expect Grisham to decline the QO. Because up is down and day is night. In short, I’m saving my predictions for the contest.
I bet he takes the QO. If he stays 100% healthy for ’26 he should have a decent year and can go back to FA without the QO. His value is diminished this off season with that compensation attached.
I like him in a Tiger uniform for 1 more year. It gives McGonigal and maybe Anderson a chance to ease into the ix as rookies in ’26.
I could see Grisham and Torres possibly accepting but not the rest
—King is going to be 31 on opening day, has only pitched more than 105 innings once in his career. A QO is worth more than his career earnings to date. Possible accept.
—Grisham had a .650 OPS combined over the past 3 seasons prior to 2025. A QO is also worth more than his career earnings to date. Another possible accept.
—Woodruff will be 33 on opening day, due to injuries he hasn’t pitched a full season since 2022. Another guy who might struggle to find a multi-year big $ deal. Another year of health (at QO value) might get him that big deal 12 months from now. So another possible accept.
—Everyone else should decline.
I feel for Trent Grisham. He had a nice season & was in line for a multi year, eight figure contract. That QO just sank those aspirations
they dont call it the Evil Empire for nothing
Half the players listed will accept the QO. They are not even that good of players to warrant that level. MLB has some financially unsound practices.
Mistake for Cubs to QO Imanaga. He will likely accept it.
Of the top 10 free agents, the cubbies will be lucky to sign 1 despite having all this extra money to spend.
Wonder if the big market dodgers operate on yearly baseball budget as the big market cubs publicly seem to do year after year?
Oh let’s not forget dodgers that dodgers predicated on winning over anything else!
as opposed to being predicated on what exactly…charity?