Thirteen players have received a qualifying offer this year, reports Jeff Passan of ESPN. The list is as follows:
- Kyle Tucker, OF, Cubs
- Kyle Schwarber, OF/DH, Phillies
- Bo Bichette, SS/2B, Blue Jays
- Framber Valdez, LHP, Astros
- Dylan Cease, RHP, Padres
- Ranger Suarez, LHP, Phillies
- Edwin Diaz, RHP, Mets
- Zac Gallen, RHP, D-backs
- Shota Imanaga, LHP, Cubs
- Michael King, RHP, Padres
- Trent Grisham, OF, Yankees
- Gleyber Torres, 2B, Tigers
- Brandon Woodruff, RHP, Brewers
This year’s QO is valued at $22.025MM. All 13 players will have until Nov. 18 to decide whether to accept that one-year offer or decline and become a free agent. They can spend that time gauging the open market to determine interest in their services. If a player accepts the QO, he’ll be treated as a free agent signing and thus will be ineligible to be traded without his consent until June 15 of next year. If he declines, any team that signs him will be subject to draft and/or international bonus forfeitures, depending on its revenue-sharing and luxury tax status.
The bulk of the list was generally expected. Every recipient other than Torres and Imanaga was pegged as likely or a no-doubter to receive the QO on MLBTR’s annual lists of qualifying offer previews for position players and for pitchers. Torres was viewed as something of a long shot, at least on the MLBTR staff. He’s coming off a nice season in Detroit but struggled through a poor finish — perhaps in part due to injury — and wasn’t hit with a QO last offseason when coming off a comparable year at the plate in the Bronx.
Imanaga was listed as a borderline call on our preview as well. The Cubs declined a three-year, $57MM option on Imanaga last week. He subsequently declined a $15MM player option (which came with an additional player option at $15MM) — effectively opting out of a remaining two years and $30MM. The Cubs are banking on Imanaga also turning away one year at just over $22MM after turning down that remaining $30MM in guaranteed money.
The qualifying offer is determined each year by taking the average of the game’s 125 highest-paid players. We’ve already covered the penalties that each team would face for signing a qualified free agent, as well as the compensation each club would get for losing a qualified free agent to another team.
Among the notable free agents to not receive a qualifying offer are Lucas Giolito, Robert Suarez, Devin Williams and Jorge Polanco. Giolito might have received one had it not been for a late elbow issue that ended his season. Suarez has been excellent and just opted out of the remaining two years and $16MM on his contract, but he’ll be 35 next year. The Padres have been reducing payroll in recent seasons and likely didn’t want to risk Suarez locking in that weighty one-year sum. Williams would have received a QO with a typical season, but he struggled throughout much of the season’s first four months before a dominant finish. Polanco enjoyed a terrific rebound campaign but is 32 years old and was limited to DH work for much of the season due to ongoing injury issues.
The qualifying offer grants each of these free agents the chance at a notable one-year payday, though the majority of them will reject without much thought. Players like Tucker, Bichette, Schwarber, Valdez, Cease, Suarez and Diaz are likely to see comparable or larger (much larger, in Tucker’s case) salaries on multi-year deals in free agency. Even players like Grisham, who probably won’t land a $22MM annual value over multiple years, are still likely to reject. Major league free agents typically — though not always — prioritize long-term earning over short-term, higher-AAV pacts. A three- or four-year deal worth $14-16MM per year, for instance, is typically viewed as preferable to accepting one year at a higher rate.
There’s risk in declining the offer, of course. Teams are more reluctant to sign players who’ll cost them valuable draft picks and/or notable portions of their hard-capped bonus pool for international amateurs. Every offseason, there are a handful of free agents whose markets are weighed down by the burden of draft pick compensation. That typically applies to the “lower end” of the QO recipients. For top stars like Tucker, Bichette, etc. — draft/international forfeitures are simply considered the cost of doing business and don’t tend to have much (if any) impact on the player’s earning power.

OMG. what are the yankees thinking. i hope he doesn’t take it. and wants a longer deal
He’s not taking it. The outfield free agent market consists of Tucker, Bellinger, Bader, and Grisham. After that it’s a lot of question marks and hope.
There’s worse things than having his glove and righty splits on a 1 year deal.
I wish they had posted one to Williams too.
I saw someone say he will sign with someone 1 year 10 million lol. I would be pumped if rangers did 3 years 50 million.
@mlb
If Grishy do a 1 year deal he’d be doing the Yanks a favor. It’s not like he had success out of no where. He was a 1st round pick. He did have moments of success previously. The worst thing that can Halen is they waste money on a 1 year deal. However, I’m sure Grishy will be even more motivated to have a great 2026 so he can cash in next off-season if he decides to accept it.
Chuckled at can Halen.
I don’t see much of a market for Grisham with a QO and no much track record. I see 36MM-40MM/3 Years with no QO.
He is calling Yankees right now 22MM for one?
Gallen is in the other line. What a better way to reestablish his value, stay home and reenter next year seeking the 25MM-30MM per, that he does not has this year.
It’s an interesting move, but not unexpected. Most speculation had the Yankees extending the QO. Many fans didn’t want to, but replacing Grisham won’t be easy. Spencer Jones is not the answer at this stage. I’d rather see Jones serve as the 4th OFer and see if he can force himself into the lineup. Depending on him is way more risky than Grisham.
Maybe their goal is to bring in another CFer, but at minimum, they’re could be hoping he accepts so they have one spot covered and can negotiate from a position of strength in trades and potential free agents. His underlying numbers indicate his 2025 season was not a fluke. He also surprisingly hit poorly at Yankee Stadium, so there is room for improvement. Last, if he doesn’t accept, they get a draft pick. I don’t see much downside here, if any at all.
This is probably correct. The worst that happens is they overpaid for Grisham, they fill a position, and they keep the player for the year. He wouldn’t be the first guy the Yankees overpaid…
The Yankees are notoriously stingy with QOs, so that’s another reason this is interesting. They don’t hand them out easily. Maybe their preference is not to have him come back, but they’re assessment is he’ll have a good market and they’ll get the pick. I actually believe he will have quite a bit of interest.
Torres is the only mild surprise to me on the list receiving. I thought he was a close call.
Woodruff is a bit of a surprise to me, and I wonder if he accepts it
Hope so. His health would make a longer-term deal risky for another team until he can get through an entire season. And he has only played for the Brewers — loves the organization, and vice versa.
I wish the love of the team, the town, the fans etc. made a difference, but I still think you may be right. A very solid ‘prove it’ year could very well result in a better contact for him next year than he could find now.
Shota also. He most likely accepts
No chance. He’s homer-prone but otherwise is a solid 3/4 starter. Someone will give him a 3 or 4 year deal @ 15-17M per.
Not really from a Harris’ perspective either:
A,) Torres rejects the QO and the Tigers get a Comp B pick before the 3rd round.
Or,
B.) Torres takes the offer, which falls in line with his short term contract approach.
Either way, the way Harris does dealings, this is a win-win. They either get Torres for another year, or have a fairly high draft pick to restock the farm system.
I would believe Torres accepts the QO as it’s a 50% raise over his 20205 Salary and he’ll be a feee agent in 27 without a QO attached. Makes decent $$$ this year with another prove it deal heading into FA again
The Imanaga and Torres ones seem the most likely to be taken by the player given how they faltered down the stretch.
I agree but would add Grisham based on a short track record. Another great platform year and no QO attached would really help his case for a long term deal
Yanks had to off him IMO because they can’t afford to loose both he and Belli.
I guess i should have clarified and added the two that the team hopes they don’t accept. If he accepts the Yanks would be cool with that I imagine.
Yeah, these are the 2 I would have as most likely
The Cubs certainly didn’t want the NTC attached to the three year team option. I could see them offering Imanaga 2/40 with only a NTC for 2026.
if he accepts there is no NTC. He just takes the 22M and Jed could flip him after if he wanted to
If he accepts he can’t be traded until June at the earliest
If he accepts a QO I believe he’d need to remain with the Cubs through at least midseason.
Have to wait a certain amount of time after after accepting.
I would at most give him a partial no trade clause. Let him pick 10 teams that he can block a trade too
I was thinking a full NTC for 2026 (because if they are sellers at the deadline there are much bigger problems, and Happ, Suzuki, Hoerner, and Kelly would all get traded first). Then no NTC for 2027 after the lockout.
I know Grisham had a career year, but I can’t imagine anyone paying him more than 22 million a year.
They don’t have to. A three- or four-year deal worth $15-16MM per season would still be preferable to one year at 22.
Would it really though? If I were offered the choice between a 1/22 and a 4/60 deal, I would probably take the shorter deal. All he would have to beat is 3/38 NEXT year in order to come out ahead. It’s a gamble, but it’s a gamble where you are banking $22 million this year regardless. And you would spend next season in the same strong lineup as this year. And next year you would have no chance of a qualifying offer.
He put up below-average offensive numbers his past three seasons prior to this one. The outfield market is very thin this off-season. This is his chance to cash in and he’s going to do it.
Call me crazy, but I’m locking in the $60 MILLION DOLLARS no question, especially when his career earnings are “only” in the $13 million range to date.
It’s not. Grisham’s underlying stats show that his season wasn’t a fluke. I would be concerned with his declined defense.
Yeah, but the only money “locked in” right now is the $22 million. There’s no guarantee he’ll get the offer you’re suggesting. He’s had 1 good season (2025) in his career, so it has to be tempting to take that guaranteed salary. He can always seek a 3 year deal in 2027 too…if he replicates this season’s numbers. I’m not holding my breath on that, though.
The only thing he can lock in for sure is the $22M. The alternative might be likely but not a certainty.
Good luck to you, but I disagree.
There is no such thing as a certainty in life other than death. Even if he signs a 4/60 deal, he will likely lose about 25% of that during a work stoppage. It’s called betting on yourself. If someone is willing to offer me $22 million this year and I am only 29 years old coming off the best year of my career, why wouldn’t I think I can do better than a little $12 million a year next year when I am still only 30?
YBC I’m not so worried about his defense. He easily passes the eye test and that’s as good as any of the defensive metrics. Especially since the various metrics don’t agree with each other. He also had a hamstring issue he was dealing with.
Hey Mule, it’s Mark from JITH. How are you doing.
But that is under the assumption he doesn’t turn back into a pumpkin offensively or suffer a major injury. His agents have five days to gauge interest. I would say a lot of players will be seeking signing bonuses which get paid weather or not they strike and they can be paid out over the years nor all at once.
Because injuries that decimate performance are real. Extremely common.
What a better reason to accept the QO if he has only earn 13MM in 6 years he will be irresponsible not to take that, there is no 60MM? unless is for 8 years.
The best example I can give now is Joc Pederson. He accepted the QO instead of seeking a multi year deal and he undoubtedly made more money that way. And he has basically stunk in 2 of 3 years since accepting the offer.
Not at 29 with a CF defense-first profile, I would think.
Wow Grisham
If he takes they can flip him in a trade. Maybe that’s already worked out. If he doesn’t they get a 4th round pick. Win win,
Can’t trade a player who accepts a QO until the following June.
I believe i read somewhere they can if he agrees to be traded
He couldnt be traded til’ June if he accepts
Yes, June 15th is the date
Most trades don’t happen until deadline day anyway, so the June date is kind of irrelevant. I don’t think there were any trades before July this year other than DFA trades.
Uhhh… Devers
Okay there was one trade two weeks before July.. My apologies for forgetting that one.
Andrew Vaughn too, which turned out to be significant
No-brainers: Tucker, Valdez, Bichette, Schwarber, Cease, King, Suarez, Diaz
Made me go hmmm, but not overly shocked: Imanaga, Gallen, Grisham
Surprised: Torres, Woodruff
Woodruff is not a surprise.
Woodruff should be a surprise. Typical Milwaukee FO bias thinking. No problem paying Woodruff 22M (let alone 9M each year in 2024 & 2025), yet considering trading Peralta because he’s making 8M. Ridiculous!!
Bet they wouldn’t offer Peralta a 22M QO if it was him instead of Woodruff!
One WS appearance (over 40 years ago) in 55 years. The “tradition” and “culture” continues.
I agree that Woodruff is a surprise, but the comparison to Peralta is irrelevant. They aren’t considering moving Peralta to save the $8M, they would be doing it to get talent back for him in his walk year.
My point is the Brewers don’t treat certain types of players equally over the past 15-20 years.
To address your point, why not offer Peralta a contract extension at a higher salary instead of letting him walk? INSTEAD of possibly paying Woodruff 22M!! I’d rather have Peralta at 15-25M per season than Woodruff.
I’m not sure that you can get Peralta to sign for that range, and probably would take 6-8 years. But yes, locking in Peralta, if they could, would be a better use of resources.
Peralta will make far more in free agency than $25M. Look at his stats and he never misses a start.
I agree. Peralta would make more in free agency. Perhaps don’t let it reach that point. I think he would accept long term security on a “home” discount and wouldn’t mind staying in MKE for four to six more years @ 20-25M per year.
Point is if Woodruff had Peralta’s history and stats, the Brewers would probably offer Woodruff that kind of contract. I could be wrong?
He’s getting more than that per year, simple as that. The Brewers want the pick for Woodruff, if they were trying to sign him their MO would be to do that years ago when you could take advantage of him being further away from free agency.
The Brewers won “their” WS… they beat the Cubs. That’s all they’ll accomplish.
They’re not considering trading Peralta because he makes $8 million this year. They’re considering trading him because they don’t want to get in a bidding war for whatever contract he demands AFTER this year, and they want to maximize his value, if possible. They would 100% offer Peralta a QO in a similar position.
surprise if Milwaukee would offer it. Not that he was worth it.
Fascinating that Gleyber got one. I have to think he accepts. I don’t think he could get 22 on the market (unless he’d prefer term which he can get next year)…
Dumbest rule ….
Huh.
No Giolito? Im not sure im surprised or not. Makes me think there’s red Sox trainers maybe know more about that season ending arm injury than we do.
They have also stated a need to add a pitcher who “moves the needle” which Giolito is not, and him coming back at $22M makes that guy nearly impossible to fit into the salary.
For the price, at a 1 year deal if healthy, he’d make a heck of a #3…
Unfortunately, I’ve been getting nervous vibes about this offseason since the details of Duran’s deal came down.
They spent a bunch of time negotiating for a net $100k savings… unless he’s hurt he’s going to make those PA incentives, but, rather than just pick up the $8m option, how much effort must’ve gone into negotiations with the agent and player to save a pittance?
That makes me fear the pursestrings are going to be tightened this winter. I just hope that’s not the case.
The team makes *plenty* enough cash to have issued the QO and still get a #2/co-ace to pair with crochet…
Calling Giolito a #3 is quite generous, he’s a #4-5 who used to throw a lot of innings but has struggled with injuries since signing with Boston
Am I crazy or did the Cubs kinda do Imanaga dirty here?
No, his team option had a NTC attached to it. After that horrible September, they can’t go along with a 3 year NTC even if they were ok with the salary (which was less than 22 AAV).
Imanaga can choose to accept the QO and go back out and get a 2/38 after next season and still be ahead.
How so?
They declined his option, saying they didn’t want his services… but now they are trying to get draft pick compensation if he signs elsewhere.
Not saying they did something wrong… but it does feel strange. Like a loophole in the QO system.
What’s clear is the Cubs didn’t want him at 3/57 and a NTC. He also didn’t want a 1/15. What loophole? Nothing has changed since the day he signed the Cubs deal.
or Did Imanaga do himself dirty by struggling in the 2nd half?
Thought Robert Suarez might get one, but Padres probably need to focus that money on the rotation.
no reason. They covered the closer in July.
I would think SD would use Mason Miller as their Closer, and use the money saved by Suarez leaving to try to replace Cease and King. Or move Miller to the rotation and sign someone like Fairbanks.
Woodruff Jersey saved from going to Goodwill! Shocked the Brewers would give the bearded one that kind of money!
Ill be surprised if woodruff accepts it. He can easily beat 22 million on a multi year deal. He even gets that with a pillow deal with an opt out.
I don’t think he gets more than that per year (probably less). If someone gives him 2-3 years he’d end up with more guaranteed overall, but I’m not sure how much more. Most predictions so far have him in the 2/25-3/40 range.
He wasnt saying he woukd get that PER YEAR, he meant over the course of a multi-year deal. Say he gets 15M per and 2 or 3 years. As the article states, most guys prefer a.multi-year contract with a lower AAV vs a.one year contract at a higher AAV.
The first 7 players will almost certainly decline the QO. Gallen should probably accept the QO and hope for a better season in 2026. Imanaga is tough to figure out. If I were him, I’d decline the QO. King should definitely decline it. Grisham should decline it, because he may never have another season like 2025. This is his best chance to get a solid multi-year contract. Torres should probably decline too, as he should be able to get a multi-year deal due to a lack of top 2B available. Woodruff, like Gallen, should accept the QO and hope for a better 2026.
Just my opinions.
Woodruff’s QO is most confusing to be. I get what the Cubs did with Shota. They shed two years, risk paying a couple million more for one year, have a shot at getting a pick. No losses there. Woodruff got a ten million dollar buy-out. Thats over a net 12 million dollar difference. If he accepts, (I assume anyways), he gets 32 million from the Brewers for next year’s services.
The last three on the list and Imanaga will accept the Qualifying Offer.
Wrong.
Grisham, Woodruff, Galen and Imanaga surprise me. $22 m seems like an overpay.
Yanks should let Trent go and put the Martian in center and jones in left
Detroit did its part. It would be nice if Gleyber accepts it.
Grisham and Torres accept. Maybe Gallen. Those are my picks.
Grisham made himself a nice deal, no matter if he accepts or rejects the Yankees offer. His bat woke up enough to give a few years of future hope to his past several years of not realizing expectations.
Outrageous $ these guys get.
It would be great if Torres accepts.
I think the Cubs will be fine with whatever way Imanaga goes. He’ll either be expensive rotation depth, or he walks and it frees up money to use elsewhere.