Headlines

  • 13 Players Receive Qualifying Offers
  • Rays Decline Option On Pete Fairbanks
  • Rockies To Hire Paul DePodesta To Run Baseball Operations
  • Dodgers Exercise Club Options On Max Muncy, Alex Vesia
  • Padres Hire Craig Stammen As Manager
  • Phillies Exercise Option On Jose Alvarado
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

13 Players Receive Qualifying Offers

By Steve Adams | November 6, 2025 at 5:40pm CDT

Thirteen players have received a qualifying offer this year, reports Jeff Passan of ESPN. The list is as follows:

  • Kyle Tucker, OF, Cubs
  • Kyle Schwarber, OF/DH, Phillies
  • Bo Bichette, SS/2B, Blue Jays
  • Framber Valdez, LHP, Astros
  • Dylan Cease, RHP, Padres
  • Ranger Suarez, LHP, Phillies
  • Edwin Diaz, RHP, Mets
  • Zac Gallen, RHP, D-backs
  • Shota Imanaga, LHP, Cubs
  • Michael King, RHP, Padres
  • Trent Grisham, OF, Yankees
  • Gleyber Torres, 2B, Tigers
  • Brandon Woodruff, RHP, Brewers

This year’s QO is valued at $22.025MM. All 13 players will have until Nov. 18 to decide whether to accept that one-year offer or decline and become a free agent. They can spend that time gauging the open market to determine interest in their services. If a player accepts the QO, he’ll be treated as a free agent signing and thus will be ineligible to be traded without his consent until June 15 of next year. If he declines, any team that signs him will be subject to draft and/or international bonus forfeitures, depending on its revenue-sharing and luxury tax status.

The bulk of the list was generally expected. Every recipient other than Torres and Imanaga was pegged as likely or a no-doubter to receive the QO on MLBTR’s annual lists of qualifying offer previews for position players and for pitchers. Torres was viewed as something of a long shot, at least on the MLBTR staff. He’s coming off a nice season in Detroit but struggled through a poor finish — perhaps in part due to injury — and wasn’t hit with a QO last offseason when coming off a comparable year at the plate in the Bronx.

Imanaga was listed as a borderline call on our preview as well. The Cubs declined a three-year, $57MM option on Imanaga last week. He subsequently declined a $15MM player option (which came with an additional player option at $15MM) — effectively opting out of a remaining two years and $30MM. The Cubs are banking on Imanaga also turning away one year at just over $22MM after turning down that remaining $30MM in guaranteed money.

The qualifying offer is determined each year by taking the average of the game’s 125 highest-paid players. We’ve already covered the penalties that each team would face for signing a qualified free agent, as well as the compensation each club would get for losing a qualified free agent to another team.

Among the notable free agents to not receive a qualifying offer are Lucas Giolito, Robert Suarez, Devin Williams and Jorge Polanco. Giolito might have received one had it not been for a late elbow issue that ended his season. Suarez has been excellent and just opted out of the remaining two years and $16MM on his contract, but he’ll be 35 next year. The Padres have been reducing payroll in recent seasons and likely didn’t want to risk Suarez locking in that weighty one-year sum. Williams would have received a QO with a typical season, but he struggled throughout much of the season’s first four months before a dominant finish. Polanco enjoyed a terrific rebound campaign but is 32 years old and was limited to DH work for much of the season due to ongoing injury issues.

The qualifying offer grants each of these free agents the chance at a notable one-year payday, though the majority of them will reject without much thought. Players like Tucker, Bichette, Schwarber, Valdez, Cease, Suarez and Diaz are likely to see comparable or larger (much larger, in Tucker’s case) salaries on multi-year deals in free agency. Even players like Grisham, who probably won’t land a $22MM annual value over multiple years, are still likely to reject. Major league free agents typically — though not always — prioritize long-term earning over short-term, higher-AAV pacts. A three- or four-year deal worth $14-16MM per year, for instance, is typically viewed as preferable to accepting one year at a higher rate.

There’s risk in declining the offer, of course. Teams are more reluctant to sign players who’ll cost them valuable draft picks and/or notable portions of their hard-capped bonus pool for international amateurs. Every offseason, there are a handful of free agents whose markets are weighed down by the burden of draft pick compensation. That typically applies to the “lower end” of the QO recipients. For top stars like Tucker, Bichette, etc. — draft/international forfeitures are simply considered the cost of doing business and don’t tend to have much (if any) impact on the player’s earning power.

Share Repost Send via email

Chicago Cubs Detroit Tigers Houston Astros Milwaukee Brewers New York Mets New York Yankees Newsstand Philadelphia Phillies San Diego Padres Toronto Blue Jays Bo Bichette Brandon Woodruff Dylan Cease Edwin Diaz Framber Valdez Gleyber Torres Kyle Schwarber Kyle Tucker Michael King Ranger Suarez Shota Imanaga Trent Grisham Zac Gallen

Rays Decline Option On Pete Fairbanks
Main
View Comments (100)
Post a Comment

100 Comments

  1. mlbnyyfan

    2 hours ago

    OMG. what are the yankees thinking. i hope he doesn’t take it. and wants a longer deal

    3
    Reply
    • MuleorAstroMule

      2 hours ago

      He’s not taking it. The outfield free agent market consists of Tucker, Bellinger, Bader, and Grisham. After that it’s a lot of question marks and hope.

      3
      Reply
    • Walk Off Freddie

      2 hours ago

      There’s worse things than having his glove and righty splits on a 1 year deal.

      1
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        38 mins ago

        I wish they had posted one to Williams too.

        Reply
        • Champ world champion Texas Rangers

          4 mins ago

          I saw someone say he will sign with someone 1 year 10 million lol. I would be pumped if rangers did 3 years 50 million.

          Reply
    • KnicksFanCavsFan

      38 mins ago

      @mlb

      If Grishy do a 1 year deal he’d be doing the Yanks a favor. It’s not like he had success out of no where. He was a 1st round pick. He did have moments of success previously. The worst thing that can Halen is they waste money on a 1 year deal. However, I’m sure Grishy will be even more motivated to have a great 2026 so he can cash in next off-season if he decides to accept it.

      Reply
      • Non Roster Invitee

        12 mins ago

        Chuckled at can Halen.

        1
        Reply
    • pepenas34

      14 mins ago

      I don’t see much of a market for Grisham with a QO and no much track record. I see 36MM-40MM/3 Years with no QO.
      He is calling Yankees right now 22MM for one?
      Gallen is in the other line. What a better way to reestablish his value, stay home and reenter next year seeking the 25MM-30MM per, that he does not has this year.

      Reply
    • LordD99

      12 mins ago

      It’s an interesting move, but not unexpected. Most speculation had the Yankees extending the QO. Many fans didn’t want to, but replacing Grisham won’t be easy. Spencer Jones is not the answer at this stage. I’d rather see Jones serve as the 4th OFer and see if he can force himself into the lineup. Depending on him is way more risky than Grisham.

      Maybe their goal is to bring in another CFer, but at minimum, they’re could be hoping he accepts so they have one spot covered and can negotiate from a position of strength in trades and potential free agents. His underlying numbers indicate his 2025 season was not a fluke. He also surprisingly hit poorly at Yankee Stadium, so there is room for improvement. Last, if he doesn’t accept, they get a draft pick. I don’t see much downside here, if any at all.

      1
      Reply
      • mike156

        8 mins ago

        This is probably correct. The worst that happens is they overpaid for Grisham, they fill a position, and they keep the player for the year. He wouldn’t be the first guy the Yankees overpaid…

        1
        Reply
        • LordD99

          41 seconds ago

          The Yankees are notoriously stingy with QOs, so that’s another reason this is interesting. They don’t hand them out easily. Maybe their preference is not to have him come back, but they’re assessment is he’ll have a good market and they’ll get the pick. I actually believe he will have quite a bit of interest.

          Reply
  2. Baltimore_44

    2 hours ago

    Torres is the only mild surprise to me on the list receiving. I thought he was a close call.

    8
    Reply
    • mainesox

      2 hours ago

      Woodruff is a bit of a surprise to me, and I wonder if he accepts it

      3
      Reply
      • cheesemanforever

        1 hour ago

        Hope so. His health would make a longer-term deal risky for another team until he can get through an entire season. And he has only played for the Brewers — loves the organization, and vice versa.

        Reply
        • Logic 101

          36 mins ago

          I wish the love of the team, the town, the fans etc. made a difference, but I still think you may be right. A very solid ‘prove it’ year could very well result in a better contact for him next year than he could find now.

          Reply
    • CFS77

      2 hours ago

      Shota also. He most likely accepts

      2
      Reply
      • rememberthecoop

        53 mins ago

        No chance. He’s homer-prone but otherwise is a solid 3/4 starter. Someone will give him a 3 or 4 year deal @ 15-17M per.

        Reply
    • xXTheFETTXx

      1 hour ago

      Not really from a Harris’ perspective either:

      A,) Torres rejects the QO and the Tigers get a Comp B pick before the 3rd round.

      Or,

      B.) Torres takes the offer, which falls in line with his short term contract approach.

      Either way, the way Harris does dealings, this is a win-win. They either get Torres for another year, or have a fairly high draft pick to restock the farm system.

      2
      Reply
    • Motown is My Town

      1 hour ago

      I would believe Torres accepts the QO as it’s a 50% raise over his 20205 Salary and he’ll be a feee agent in 27 without a QO attached. Makes decent $$$ this year with another prove it deal heading into FA again

      1
      Reply
  3. gomer33

    2 hours ago

    The Imanaga and Torres ones seem the most likely to be taken by the player given how they faltered down the stretch.

    5
    Reply
    • Walk Off Freddie

      2 hours ago

      I agree but would add Grisham based on a short track record. Another great platform year and no QO attached would really help his case for a long term deal

      4
      Reply
      • wvsteve

        2 hours ago

        Yanks had to off him IMO because they can’t afford to loose both he and Belli.

        1
        Reply
      • gomer33

        37 mins ago

        I guess i should have clarified and added the two that the team hopes they don’t accept. If he accepts the Yanks would be cool with that I imagine.

        Reply
    • Bob Sacamano 310

      2 hours ago

      Yeah, these are the 2 I would have as most likely

      Reply
    • Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

      2 hours ago

      The Cubs certainly didn’t want the NTC attached to the three year team option. I could see them offering Imanaga 2/40 with only a NTC for 2026.

      1
      Reply
      • CFS77

        2 hours ago

        if he accepts there is no NTC. He just takes the 22M and Jed could flip him after if he wanted to

        Reply
        • mainesox

          2 hours ago

          If he accepts he can’t be traded until June at the earliest

          2
          Reply
        • Armaments216

          1 hour ago

          If he accepts a QO I believe he’d need to remain with the Cubs through at least midseason.

          Reply
        • Bob Sacamano 310

          46 mins ago

          Have to wait a certain amount of time after after accepting.

          Reply
      • Logjammer D'Baggagecling

        17 mins ago

        I would at most give him a partial no trade clause. Let him pick 10 teams that he can block a trade too

        Reply
        • Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

          14 mins ago

          I was thinking a full NTC for 2026 (because if they are sellers at the deadline there are much bigger problems, and Happ, Suzuki, Hoerner, and Kelly would all get traded first). Then no NTC for 2027 after the lockout.

          Reply
  4. aLifetimeOfDefeats

    2 hours ago

    I know Grisham had a career year, but I can’t imagine anyone paying him more than 22 million a year.

    2
    Reply
    • Steve Adams

      2 hours ago

      They don’t have to. A three- or four-year deal worth $15-16MM per season would still be preferable to one year at 22.

      12
      Reply
      • hiflew

        2 hours ago

        Would it really though? If I were offered the choice between a 1/22 and a 4/60 deal, I would probably take the shorter deal. All he would have to beat is 3/38 NEXT year in order to come out ahead. It’s a gamble, but it’s a gamble where you are banking $22 million this year regardless. And you would spend next season in the same strong lineup as this year. And next year you would have no chance of a qualifying offer.

        4
        Reply
        • MuleorAstroMule

          2 hours ago

          He put up below-average offensive numbers his past three seasons prior to this one. The outfield market is very thin this off-season. This is his chance to cash in and he’s going to do it.

          3
          Reply
        • vtadave

          2 hours ago

          Call me crazy, but I’m locking in the $60 MILLION DOLLARS no question, especially when his career earnings are “only” in the $13 million range to date.

          9
          Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          1 hour ago

          It’s not. Grisham’s underlying stats show that his season wasn’t a fluke. I would be concerned with his declined defense.

          Reply
        • Dogleg62

          1 hour ago

          Yeah, but the only money “locked in” right now is the $22 million. There’s no guarantee he’ll get the offer you’re suggesting. He’s had 1 good season (2025) in his career, so it has to be tempting to take that guaranteed salary. He can always seek a 3 year deal in 2027 too…if he replicates this season’s numbers. I’m not holding my breath on that, though.

          Reply
        • Armaments216

          1 hour ago

          The only thing he can lock in for sure is the $22M. The alternative might be likely but not a certainty.

          Reply
        • hiflew

          49 mins ago

          Good luck to you, but I disagree.

          Reply
        • hiflew

          46 mins ago

          There is no such thing as a certainty in life other than death. Even if he signs a 4/60 deal, he will likely lose about 25% of that during a work stoppage. It’s called betting on yourself. If someone is willing to offer me $22 million this year and I am only 29 years old coming off the best year of my career, why wouldn’t I think I can do better than a little $12 million a year next year when I am still only 30?

          Reply
        • Joe says...

          44 mins ago

          YBC I’m not so worried about his defense. He easily passes the eye test and that’s as good as any of the defensive metrics. Especially since the various metrics don’t agree with each other. He also had a hamstring issue he was dealing with.

          1
          Reply
        • gomer33

          35 mins ago

          Hey Mule, it’s Mark from JITH. How are you doing.

          Reply
        • gomer33

          29 mins ago

          But that is under the assumption he doesn’t turn back into a pumpkin offensively or suffer a major injury. His agents have five days to gauge interest. I would say a lot of players will be seeking signing bonuses which get paid weather or not they strike and they can be paid out over the years nor all at once.

          Reply
        • foppert3

          18 mins ago

          Because injuries that decimate performance are real. Extremely common.

          Reply
        • pepenas34

          6 mins ago

          What a better reason to accept the QO if he has only earn 13MM in 6 years he will be irresponsible not to take that, there is no 60MM? unless is for 8 years.

          Reply
      • hiflew

        25 mins ago

        The best example I can give now is Joc Pederson. He accepted the QO instead of seeking a multi year deal and he undoubtedly made more money that way. And he has basically stunk in 2 of 3 years since accepting the offer.

        Reply
      • seamaholic 2

        16 mins ago

        Not at 29 with a CF defense-first profile, I would think.

        Reply
  5. billysbballz

    2 hours ago

    Wow Grisham

    If he takes they can flip him in a trade. Maybe that’s already worked out. If he doesn’t they get a 4th round pick. Win win,

    Reply
    • Steve Adams

      2 hours ago

      Can’t trade a player who accepts a QO until the following June.

      3
      Reply
      • jaysfansince1977

        1 hour ago

        I believe i read somewhere they can if he agrees to be traded

        Reply
    • virgil trucks

      2 hours ago

      He couldnt be traded til’ June if he accepts

      Reply
      • Mad Hatter

        2 hours ago

        Yes, June 15th is the date

        Reply
      • hiflew

        44 mins ago

        Most trades don’t happen until deadline day anyway, so the June date is kind of irrelevant. I don’t think there were any trades before July this year other than DFA trades.

        Reply
        • virgil trucks

          31 mins ago

          Uhhh… Devers

          Reply
        • hiflew

          29 mins ago

          Okay there was one trade two weeks before July.. My apologies for forgetting that one.

          Reply
        • virgil trucks

          5 mins ago

          Andrew Vaughn too, which turned out to be significant

          Reply
  6. vtadave

    2 hours ago

    No-brainers: Tucker, Valdez, Bichette, Schwarber, Cease, King, Suarez, Diaz

    Made me go hmmm, but not overly shocked: Imanaga, Gallen, Grisham

    Surprised: Torres, Woodruff

    3
    Reply
    • Jeremy320

      2 hours ago

      Woodruff is not a surprise.

      Reply
      • SharksFan91

        2 hours ago

        Woodruff should be a surprise. Typical Milwaukee FO bias thinking. No problem paying Woodruff 22M (let alone 9M each year in 2024 & 2025), yet considering trading Peralta because he’s making 8M. Ridiculous!!
        Bet they wouldn’t offer Peralta a 22M QO if it was him instead of Woodruff!
        One WS appearance (over 40 years ago) in 55 years. The “tradition” and “culture” continues.

        Reply
        • mainesox

          1 hour ago

          I agree that Woodruff is a surprise, but the comparison to Peralta is irrelevant. They aren’t considering moving Peralta to save the $8M, they would be doing it to get talent back for him in his walk year.

          1
          Reply
        • SharksFan91

          1 hour ago

          My point is the Brewers don’t treat certain types of players equally over the past 15-20 years.
          To address your point, why not offer Peralta a contract extension at a higher salary instead of letting him walk? INSTEAD of possibly paying Woodruff 22M!! I’d rather have Peralta at 15-25M per season than Woodruff.

          Reply
        • mainesox

          1 hour ago

          I’m not sure that you can get Peralta to sign for that range, and probably would take 6-8 years. But yes, locking in Peralta, if they could, would be a better use of resources.

          Reply
        • cheesemanforever

          1 hour ago

          Peralta will make far more in free agency than $25M. Look at his stats and he never misses a start.

          Reply
        • SharksFan91

          52 mins ago

          I agree. Peralta would make more in free agency. Perhaps don’t let it reach that point. I think he would accept long term security on a “home” discount and wouldn’t mind staying in MKE for four to six more years @ 20-25M per year.
          Point is if Woodruff had Peralta’s history and stats, the Brewers would probably offer Woodruff that kind of contract. I could be wrong?

          Reply
        • gomer33

          21 mins ago

          He’s getting more than that per year, simple as that. The Brewers want the pick for Woodruff, if they were trying to sign him their MO would be to do that years ago when you could take advantage of him being further away from free agency.

          Reply
        • holycow16

          19 mins ago

          The Brewers won “their” WS… they beat the Cubs. That’s all they’ll accomplish.

          Reply
        • fearthecub

          12 mins ago

          They’re not considering trading Peralta because he makes $8 million this year. They’re considering trading him because they don’t want to get in a bidding war for whatever contract he demands AFTER this year, and they want to maximize his value, if possible. They would 100% offer Peralta a QO in a similar position.

          Reply
      • CFS77

        1 hour ago

        surprise if Milwaukee would offer it. Not that he was worth it.

        Reply
  7. virgil trucks

    2 hours ago

    Fascinating that Gleyber got one. I have to think he accepts. I don’t think he could get 22 on the market (unless he’d prefer term which he can get next year)…

    1
    Reply
  8. BurnerK

    2 hours ago

    Dumbest rule ….

    Reply
  9. GASoxFan

    2 hours ago

    Huh.

    No Giolito? Im not sure im surprised or not. Makes me think there’s red Sox trainers maybe know more about that season ending arm injury than we do.

    Reply
    • mainesox

      2 hours ago

      They have also stated a need to add a pitcher who “moves the needle” which Giolito is not, and him coming back at $22M makes that guy nearly impossible to fit into the salary.

      1
      Reply
      • GASoxFan

        2 hours ago

        For the price, at a 1 year deal if healthy, he’d make a heck of a #3…

        Unfortunately, I’ve been getting nervous vibes about this offseason since the details of Duran’s deal came down.

        They spent a bunch of time negotiating for a net $100k savings… unless he’s hurt he’s going to make those PA incentives, but, rather than just pick up the $8m option, how much effort must’ve gone into negotiations with the agent and player to save a pittance?

        That makes me fear the pursestrings are going to be tightened this winter. I just hope that’s not the case.

        The team makes *plenty* enough cash to have issued the QO and still get a #2/co-ace to pair with crochet…

        Reply
        • mainesox

          1 hour ago

          Calling Giolito a #3 is quite generous, he’s a #4-5 who used to throw a lot of innings but has struggled with injuries since signing with Boston

          Reply
  10. rhandome

    2 hours ago

    Am I crazy or did the Cubs kinda do Imanaga dirty here?

    3
    Reply
    • Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

      2 hours ago

      No, his team option had a NTC attached to it. After that horrible September, they can’t go along with a 3 year NTC even if they were ok with the salary (which was less than 22 AAV).

      Imanaga can choose to accept the QO and go back out and get a 2/38 after next season and still be ahead.

      1
      Reply
    • Redsman59

      2 hours ago

      How so?

      Reply
      • rhandome

        2 hours ago

        They declined his option, saying they didn’t want his services… but now they are trying to get draft pick compensation if he signs elsewhere.

        Not saying they did something wrong… but it does feel strange. Like a loophole in the QO system.

        Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          1 hour ago

          What’s clear is the Cubs didn’t want him at 3/57 and a NTC. He also didn’t want a 1/15. What loophole? Nothing has changed since the day he signed the Cubs deal.

          1
          Reply
    • Blah blah blah

      2 hours ago

      or Did Imanaga do himself dirty by struggling in the 2nd half?

      1
      Reply
  11. vtadave

    2 hours ago

    Thought Robert Suarez might get one, but Padres probably need to focus that money on the rotation.

    Reply
    • CFS77

      1 hour ago

      no reason. They covered the closer in July.

      Reply
    • stuart schlotterbeck

      1 hour ago

      I would think SD would use Mason Miller as their Closer, and use the money saved by Suarez leaving to try to replace Cease and King. Or move Miller to the rotation and sign someone like Fairbanks.

      Reply
  12. harrycarey

    2 hours ago

    Woodruff Jersey saved from going to Goodwill! Shocked the Brewers would give the bearded one that kind of money!

    1
    Reply
    • The_Porcupine

      2 hours ago

      Ill be surprised if woodruff accepts it. He can easily beat 22 million on a multi year deal. He even gets that with a pillow deal with an opt out.

      Reply
      • mainesox

        1 hour ago

        I don’t think he gets more than that per year (probably less). If someone gives him 2-3 years he’d end up with more guaranteed overall, but I’m not sure how much more. Most predictions so far have him in the 2/25-3/40 range.

        1
        Reply
        • rememberthecoop

          41 mins ago

          He wasnt saying he woukd get that PER YEAR, he meant over the course of a multi-year deal. Say he gets 15M per and 2 or 3 years. As the article states, most guys prefer a.multi-year contract with a lower AAV vs a.one year contract at a higher AAV.

          Reply
  13. stuart schlotterbeck

    2 hours ago

    The first 7 players will almost certainly decline the QO. Gallen should probably accept the QO and hope for a better season in 2026. Imanaga is tough to figure out. If I were him, I’d decline the QO. King should definitely decline it. Grisham should decline it, because he may never have another season like 2025. This is his best chance to get a solid multi-year contract. Torres should probably decline too, as he should be able to get a multi-year deal due to a lack of top 2B available. Woodruff, like Gallen, should accept the QO and hope for a better 2026.

    Just my opinions.

    Reply
  14. MTDewdWV

    1 hour ago

    Woodruff’s QO is most confusing to be. I get what the Cubs did with Shota. They shed two years, risk paying a couple million more for one year, have a shot at getting a pick. No losses there. Woodruff got a ten million dollar buy-out. Thats over a net 12 million dollar difference. If he accepts, (I assume anyways), he gets 32 million from the Brewers for next year’s services.

    2
    Reply
  15. Shawn W.

    57 mins ago

    The last three on the list and Imanaga will accept the Qualifying Offer.

    Reply
    • rememberthecoop

      40 mins ago

      Wrong.

      Reply
  16. norcalblue

    49 mins ago

    Grisham, Woodruff, Galen and Imanaga surprise me. $22 m seems like an overpay.

    Reply
  17. Captainmike1

    36 mins ago

    Yanks should let Trent go and put the Martian in center and jones in left

    Reply
  18. MPrck

    35 mins ago

    Detroit did its part. It would be nice if Gleyber accepts it.

    1
    Reply
  19. CLNC

    14 mins ago

    Grisham and Torres accept. Maybe Gallen. Those are my picks.

    1
    Reply
    • 2020vision

      3 mins ago

      Grisham made himself a nice deal, no matter if he accepts or rejects the Yankees offer. His bat woke up enough to give a few years of future hope to his past several years of not realizing expectations.

      Reply
  20. Non Roster Invitee

    12 mins ago

    Outrageous $ these guys get.

    Reply
  21. Motor City Beach Bum

    4 mins ago

    It would be great if Torres accepts.

    Reply
  22. fearthecub

    2 mins ago

    I think the Cubs will be fine with whatever way Imanaga goes. He’ll either be expensive rotation depth, or he walks and it frees up money to use elsewhere.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    13 Players Receive Qualifying Offers

    Rays Decline Option On Pete Fairbanks

    Rockies To Hire Paul DePodesta To Run Baseball Operations

    Dodgers Exercise Club Options On Max Muncy, Alex Vesia

    Padres Hire Craig Stammen As Manager

    Phillies Exercise Option On Jose Alvarado

    Reds Decline Options On Brent Suter, Scott Barlow, Austin Hays

    Jorge Polanco Declines Player Option

    Braves To Exercise Club Option On Chris Sale

    Shane Bieber To Exercise Player Option

    Royals Sign Salvador Perez To Two-Year Extension

    Braves To Exercise Club Option On Ozzie Albies

    Jack Flaherty Exercises Player Option

    Trevor Story To Decline Opt-Out Clause, Will Remain With Red Sox

    Yu Darvish Undergoes UCL Surgery, Will Miss Entire 2026 Season

    Orioles Acquire Andrew Kittredge From Cubs

    Shota Imanaga Becomes Free Agent

    White Sox Exercise Club Option On Luis Robert Jr.

    Braves Name Walt Weiss New Manager

    Astros Receive PPI Pick For Hunter Brown’s Top Three Cy Young Finish

    Recent

    13 Players Receive Qualifying Offers

    Rays Decline Option On Pete Fairbanks

    Rafael Lantigua Becomes Free Agent

    Guardians Decline Club Option On John Means

    Braves Claim Michael Siani From Cardinals

    Yankees Select Kervin Castro

    Pirates Make Several Roster Moves

    Twins Outright Five Players

    Rays Claim Jake Fraley; DFA Kameron Misner, Bob Seymour

    Giants Claim Reiver Sanmartin, Justin Dean

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version