The Marlins are among the teams that have shown interest in free-agent righty Michael King, per Ken Rosenthal and Evan Drellich of The Athletic. Miami has frequently been linked to prominent bullpen arms in the offseason’s early stages as well, and the Fish are apparently planning to spend more heavily in free agency than in recent years (although that’s a pretty low bar to clear).
Skeptics will presume that the Marlins, like the A’s last offseason, are wary of running into a grievance pertaining to their allocation of revenue-sharing funds. Optimists will look at Miami’s hot finish to the 2025 season and the steps forward from young core pieces like Kyle Stowers, Jakob Marsee and Edward Cabrera as the driving factor behind the ostensible spending push. In reality, some of both are likely to be true.
Rosenthal and Drellich write that the Marlins are believed to be pulling in around $70MM annually in revenue-sharing. Teams that allocate under 150% of the revenue-sharing funds they receive to the roster (in terms of CBT obligations) can draw the union’s ire and fall subject to a grievance. That’s not true in every instance. Miami’s CBT ledger in 2025 came in around $85MM, per RosterResource. The Fish are projected for about $70MM of CBT considerations right now, however.
It seems that falling shy of that 150% threshold in consecutive seasons is what truly triggers the risk of a grievance. The A’s were the only perennial payroll cellar-dweller who seemed to be subject to a potential grievance last offseason. (They responded by signing Luis Severino and Jose Leclerc and extending Brent Rooker and Lawrence Butler.) None of the Pirates, Marlins or Rays seemed to face the same pressure.
However, each of Pittsburgh, Miami and Tampa Bay had been well over $100MM in CBT considerations in each of the preceding seasons. The A’s trotted out CBT numbers between $68MM and $84MM from 2022-24 before finally opening the wallet a bit to avoid that potential grievance. Rosenthal and Drellich also suggest that the Marlins may want to avoid any in-fighting with other clubs during the upcoming CBA talks, where luxury tax payors could argue that the Marlins aren’t using their funds properly. Readers are encouraged to check out the piece for full, more granular details on the matter and thoughts from other club officials and agents who weight in when chatting with The Athletic duo.
Regardless of the motivation, the fact that King is on Miami’s radar is notable. He’s a former Marlins draft pick, though that came under prior ownership and a different front office regime, so those ties are minimal at this point. King would step into a rotation that also includes the previously mentioned Cabrera, Sandy Alcantara, Eury Perez, Braxton Garrett and Ryan Weathers — with prospects Thomas White, Robby Snelling, Dax Fulton and Max Meyer (on the mend from surgery) all factoring in as possible options as well.
King, 30, has been excellent since moving from a swingman role with the Yankees — who acquired him in 2017’s Garrett Cooper swap — into the rotation late in the 2023 season. His 2025 campaign was shortened by a nerve injury in his shoulder and a knee injury late in the season, but King boasts a terrific 2.93 ERA (3.50 FIP, 3.66 SIERA) with a 27.4% strikeout rate and 8.3% walk rate in 53 starts since moving to a rotation role full-time.
Adding King would give Miami a playoff-caliber starter to pair with arms like Alcantara, Cabrera and Perez. He’d also make it easier for the Fish to entertain offers on young pitching, whether that be Cabrera, Weathers or some of those vaunted prospects (headlined by White). The Marlins could also give stronger consideration to dealing Alcantara if they add a veteran starter, but they’d still be selling somewhat low on him (and trading Alcantara would offset much of the payroll gains they’d obtain by signing King).
The Marlins are on the lookout for meaningful offensive upgrades, but the free agent market is generally thin on impact hitters this offseason. If the Fish instead choose to further deepen an organizational strength, they could use their stock of quality young arms to explore the trade market in search of more meaningful upgrades at the infield corners, designated hitter and/or in right field.
King rejected a $22.025MM qualifying offer from the Padres. The Marlins would pay the lightest of three penalty tiers for signing him, due to their status as a revenue-sharing recipient. Signing King would require Miami to its third-highest pick in the 2026 draft.

Well, they can’t, because MLBTR users think he’s going to the O’s, Padres or Yankees…
See? If you better incentivize cheap teams to spend more, you’ll get better teams even at the lower end of spending.
They haven’t signed the dude, and won’t. Because one of the big spenders will sign him. Proving the point that MLB finances are a mess and need to be repaired. Including a cap.
For my Astros, I’ve placed the targets on Framber Valdez reunion/Ranger Suarez. I know that isn’t likely (even though I hope it is). If that isn’t likely, will the Marlins really do it?
I mean, when was the last time they offered 90+ million.
Hard pass on a salary cap in baseball, for me.
Parity isn’t an issue.
A cap is in your dreams.
Seamaholic, my goodness gracious, it’s rich seeing a comment like that from yours when you’re one of the most infamously bootlicking pro-owner guys in the comments along with JoeBrady.
However, many Dodgers fans want to focus on the poor ownership frustrations of the small markets in order to point fingers, while they ignore the vast disparities in market revenue potential that allows the Dodgers to be “born on third with a big lead” in the equity game.
I point at my personal experience of having Frank McCourt as the Dodgers owner. He was extremely cheap, didn’t care about putting a winning team on the field, and sucked all the profits into his personal accounts.
I never once thought it was the Yankees fault for spending so much.
Never once did I think the Marlins winning two world series and stripping the team bare the following off-season was terrible for baseball. I didn’t like it for the fans, but damn they won twice.
Never did I complain about other teams doing better. The CBA, the players union, etc.
Your team owner might be cheap, but they’ll never be Frank McCourt bad.
And now that the the Dodgers fortunes are reversed, I’m happy the new ownership is all in on winning. And show it in everything they do top to bottom in the entire organization.
Money is helpful certainly. But owner attitude and perspective matters more than most fans care to admit.
As a dodgers fan I’ve experienced both. A well as the family style of the O’Malley’s, which was great as well.
@ADF – But you are only looking at it from your own personal experience as a fan of one team over time, and that is not the issue.
I am also now lucky as a Phillies fan. No, we can’t compete in market revenues with the Dodgers and Mets and Yankees, but we are still a larger market with a terrific owner (and we mostly experienced bad ownership for decades).
If you give the Marlins or Pirates et al a terrific ownership group, they are still at a big disadvantage from the word go. They cannot, out of their own revenue streams, even come close to competing in an equitable way with the big guns. They would be able to spend more, of course, and they would be more proactive as well with higher payrolls and hopefully a better run overall organization. But if one team can generate $750M in revenue and the other will generate $300M to play with then the advantages are both clear and inarguable.
I see.
Maybe, if you don’t spend, you must give your picks to the non revenue sharing recipients/give back the money. There will be a lottery from worse to better record for the picks among the non-revenue sharing teams.
You must spend at least 50 million or return it before you forfeit your draft picks.
Only spent 40-49 million and didn’t return
2nd pick, 750K from international pool
Only 30-39 million and didn’t return
2nd, 3rd, and 1MM from international pool
Only 20-29 million and didn’t return
2nd, 3rd, 4th, 1.5 million from international pool
Only 10-19 million and didn’t return
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 1.5 million from international pool
Only 0-9 million and didn’t return
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 2 million from international pool
(If you don’t have enough picks, 6th=2nd round pick in the next one, 7th=3rd round pick in the next one)
I haven’t thought it all the way so if you have any suggestions or feedback pls tell me.
Hmm. I doubt you will outbid the Cubs, Astros, Red Sox, and other teams that are richer and need starting pitching.
5 years, 100 million?
The top ace level starters in this market are…
The Red Sox, Astros, Orioles, Angels, Cubs, and more are all in need of starting pitching. The fact that the Marlins are interested in Michael sounds like the fact that the Pirates were interested in Kyle Schwarber.
1. Dylan Cease
2. Ranger Suarez
3. Framber Valdez
4. Michael King
5. Tatsuya Imai
I’d love King back on the Yankees however does he want to come back to New York? If he returns that definitely allows them to trade Gil in a Kwan package. Realistically is Kwan even available?? Could Yankees expand the trade to include Ramirez? Endless possibilities
I don’t know the Yankees well so if I do make some mistakes and don’t exactly follow their GM’s talk, then I’m sorry. Point that out.
Yankees Get:
Jose Ramirez
Guardians Get:
George Lombard Jr
Spencer Jones
Luis Gil
Kaeden Kent
This would be a large price to pay, but to get multiple MVP candidates on your team? Then I think that if the Yankees want the 28th ring, then this would be a realistic trade package.
Ramirez has a full no-trade clause in his contract.
I was answering mlbyyfan but thanks 4 pointing that out.
I don’t think either team would do that. Not to say that it’s not a good package, but J-Ram is a unicorn for a small market team that they won’t be able to replicate/replace easily.
I’d drive those prospects to the airport for jose ramirez
Ramirez will not consent to be traded anywhere, and has made his preference for remaining in Cleveland very well known.
It seems there is a limit for what ownership will spend so I doubt they’ll be trading from the cheap quality starting depth to sign king unless he signs a nick pivetta style deal.
Cease wasn’t an ace with SD, but now that he’s a FA he’s ace-level? I know opinions are swayed by K-rate, but one exceptional year out of 7 in career doesn’t equate to ace in my book. That said, he’s a cool dude.
Strangely yes.
MLB.com (not MLBTR) listed Cease higher than Suarez, Valdez, Imai, and King. So I guess so.
In unrelated news, the Michael Trout signing extravaganza is open!! Dont all rush at once with your hats gloves Frisbees
signing?
Signing. Or maybe singing? Not sure, he can croon old blue eye standards being a jersey kid.
I don’t mean to sound like a jerk but are the Marlins looking to spend because they want to or are they being forced to spend because they’re in danger of getting a grievance from the players union, like the Athletics last offseason?
No. I don’t think your sounding like a jerk. I think you actually nailed it Acoss1331, the Marlins aren’t in big need of starting pitching (at least I don’t think so), but they do need to spend. I think that’s one of the reasons.
Acoss check out David Samson on YouTube. I think he has it right. The low spending teams are looking to spend more as they are at odds with higher spending teams. They are after more shared revenue and want to show they’re spending on players. He says it much better than I am.
Thanks guys, and will definitely check out the video!
I like Michael King to the Red Sox. If not, then they will sign either Suarez or Imai. Boston should stay away from Dylan Cease in my opinion.
Honestly, I feel like Valdez is more likely
Why even post these silly : teams are in interested in…fill in the blank… articles. Everyone has interest in everyone at the right price.
Pirates interested in Kyle Schwarber
Marlins interested in Michael King
Next thing you know, A’s are interested in Kyle Tucker.
The site is called MLB Trade *Rumors*.
Simple butch, these are what folks call rumours and funny but this sites name is MLBTR or called Major League Baseball Trade Rumours!!! hope that answers your question!!!
Just to pile on because anyone asking these asinine questions when the site is literally called MLB TRADE RUMORS definitely deserves it. Sooo…
Just in case you haven’t heard of it, you are at:
M L B T R A D E R U M O R S . C O M
Thank you for stopping by and reading a said rumor.
I wonder how Roster Resource comes up with these revenue sharing numbers. Very few of the figures required to estimate how much revenue is shared in MLB are public.
Baseball doesn’t need a salary cap when they can just increase the penalties for luxury taxes. That funnels even more money from LA, NY, CHI, BOS, PHI to revenue recipients. Offer the union an extra roster spot and raises for minimum salary and minor leaguers. That effectively creates a salary floor.
The sports that have salary caps either allow loopholes like dead money and void years or they have aprons and no show deals circumventing the rules. Baseball actually has a system that gives from the wealthiest and gives to the poorest, it just needs the rate adjusted and ways of guaranteeing that money goes into the on field product.
More luxury tax money means more suffering for pirate fans cuz that cheap bum will really never sell then
The system you advocate for just creates an incentive for some cheap owners to spend the bare minimum in order to make a profit. They will never have a desire to build a winner.
Its really just a welfare system to keep up the myth there are 30 teams vying for a championship.
A hard cap would be even more welfare. Then you remove even the big markets from investing in the product. A luxury tax increase creates a compromise between the system we have now and a welfare system like a hard cap.
Nah not happening. He’ll have offers from better teams and Marlins ain’t breaking the bank for him.