Headlines

  • Astros Designate Ramon Urias For Assignment
  • Nine Players Reject Qualifying Offer
  • Trent Grisham To Accept Qualifying Offer
  • Gleyber Torres To Accept Qualifying Offer
  • Shota Imanaga To Accept Cubs’ Qualifying Offer
  • Brandon Woodruff Accepts Qualifying Offer
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Trent Grisham To Accept Qualifying Offer

By Steve Adams | November 18, 2025 at 2:56pm CDT

Outfielder Trent Grisham is accepting his $22.025MM qualifying offer and will return to the Yankees in 2026, reports ESPN’s Jorge Castillo. Players who accept a QO are considered free agent signings and are thus ineligible to be traded prior to the following June 15 unless they consent to the move.

It’s at least a modest surprise, as Grisham is coming off a breakout year at the plate which saw him club a career-high 34 home runs. He slashed .235/.348/.464, thanks in no small part to a career-best 14.1% walk rate and a 23.6% strikeout rate that stood as the second-lowest in his career. Between that production, the fact that Grisham only just turned 29 earlier this month, and a thin outfield market in free agency, the stars seemed to align for him to pursue a weighty multi-year contract this winter.

Instead, Grisham returns to the site of his breakout and will hold down a key role in an outfield that’s also currently slated to include Jasson Dominguez and Aaron Judge. The Yankees are interested in re-signing Cody Bellinger, have been linked to Kyle Tucker and also have DH Giancarlo Stanton at least loosely in the outfield mix. (He played 132 outfield innings in 2025.)

Grisham’s return muddies the waters a bit, but GM Brian Cashman said recently that even if he accepted, it wouldn’t impact the team’s pursuit of a new deal with Bellinger (link via the New York Post’s Greg Joyce). The Yankees wouldn’t have made the QO to Grisham if they believed his acceptance was a roadblock to bringing back Bellinger or signing Tucker. They’re surely glad to have him back. Even though his defensive grades took an unexpected downturn in ’25, he has the best defensive track record in center of the Yankees’ in-house options.

While Grisham could have looked to cash in this winter, he’ll instead take a hefty one-year payday in what amounts to a bet on himself. Though he’s a left-handed bat, his power output was hardly a product of Yankee Stadium’s short right field porch. In fact, Grisham hit just .195/.326/.376 at home this season, compared to .254/.364/.506 on the road. If he can replicate this year’s huge power production, he could hit the market next offseason on the back of consecutive plus seasons at the plate and without the encumbrance of a qualifying offer. A big enough showing this year could realistically position Grisham for a $100MM+ contract — particularly if his defensive grades rebound, too.

The looming potential for a work stoppage is one other wrinkle to consider, but if anything, today’s glut of QO decisions suggests that players aren’t necessarily going to shy away from short-term deals that put them on the open market next year — at least not en masse. Grisham is one of four players to accept the QO, joining Gleyber Torres, Shota Imanaga and Brandon Woodruff in that regard. In a vacuum, any one of the four accepting his QO wouldn’t be considered a major surprise — but all four accepting in the same offseason is downright atypical. This marks the first time since the inception of the qualifying offer that more than three players have accepted a QO.

With Grisham back in the fold, the Yankees’ projected payroll for the upcoming season jumps to about $263MM, per RosterResource. They’ll now have about $286MM of luxury tax obligations, placing them just over the third penalty line. That means that the Yankees’ top pick in the 2026 draft will drop by 10 places, unless they’re able to sneak their luxury count back under $284MM. Given the wide swath of offseason dealings that’s likely still on the table for Cashman & Co., that doesn’t seem to be a very likely outcome. In all likelihood, the Yankees will wind up in the top CBT penalty tier, just as they’ve done in each of the past three seasons.

Turning to the rest of the league, Grisham’s early removal from the free agent market — to a team that didn’t clearly need to retain him, no less — subtracts arguably the top center field option from the market. Bellinger, of course, can still play center but barely did so in 2025. Most teams probably consider him more of a corner outfielder/first baseman who can play occasional center field. Harrison Bader and Cedric Mullins are the two most notable options still on the market, though the former has been more of a part-time player and the latter is looking to bounce back from an awful 2025 showing. The market was light on center fielders to begin with and is even more so now, so teams looking for help at the position might be more inclined to turn to the trade market to address that deficiency.

Share Repost Send via email

New York Yankees Newsstand Transactions Cody Bellinger Kyle Tucker Trent Grisham

Gleyber Torres To Accept Qualifying Offer
Main
Nine Players Reject Qualifying Offer
View Comments (147)
Post a Comment

147 Comments

  1. LordD99

    3 hours ago

    He’s back.

    5
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      3 hours ago

      This was the most obvious “accept” for me, at least this year.

      19
      Reply
      • horaceallen

        3 hours ago

        Same

        1
        Reply
      • LordD99

        3 hours ago

        I would have thought Gleyber. I had Grisham at 50-50.

        8
        Reply
        • ASTROS27!

          3 hours ago

          I thought Trent Grisham should accept, but I didn’t think he would

          2
          Reply
        • jerseyjohn

          20 mins ago

          Agreed. My list was Gleyber, Grisham, no one.
          As a Yankee fan I’m cool with him back on a 1 year deal. I don’t know if it was the hammy but his D really fell off. Hopefully he comes in playing elite CF. He seems too young for his modest speed to be gone.

          1
          Reply
      • dm867

        3 hours ago

        [Ryan O’Neil has entered that chat] And strained a lat in the process. Will be out 3-4 weeks.

        Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 hours ago

          Acting is hard work. Too bad Tyler strained an eyeball reading this!

          1
          Reply
        • ASTROS27!

          2 hours ago

          Ouch

          Reply
      • Rexhudler86

        2 hours ago

        @gwynning. This might be the year you dont want a pick attached. Best to take the one year deal. Next year might not be better just feel like he was going to get squeezed out regardless.

        Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 hours ago

          You’d prefer to be an unpaid FA during a Lockout? No spotlight on you or wrong answer, Huds… just saying.

          2
          Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      1 hour ago

      He wont hit 10 home runs in 2026, after is PEDs wear off.

      1
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        31 mins ago

        He’s hit more than 10 homers several times in his career with the Padres.

        Reply
  2. Simm

    3 hours ago

    Players are definitely taking the money upfront over 2-3 year deals because of the possible lockout

    7
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      3 hours ago

      Seems counterintuitive? I’d rather sign a 3yr/$50MM than a 1yr/$22MM if there’s an imminent Lockout… then again, nobody’s holding my feet to the flame!

      6
      Reply
      • Simm

        3 hours ago

        Nah because if they get zero next year getting the money upfront helps more

        5
        Reply
        • Gwynning

          3 hours ago

          3yr/$50MM would be guaranteed. Lockout or not.

          4
          Reply
        • Simm

          3 hours ago

          If they miss games because of a lockout they aren’t being paid

          9
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          3 hours ago

          Well, they can… just depends on your contract. Deferrals still get paid, even in a Lockout. Just have to be creative in your approach, but I’m not passing judgment on their 1yr approach. Good for all the players!

          1
          Reply
        • The Raven

          2 hours ago

          I do not believe so. If, say, the league loses an entire year, than the players lose that year as well.

          1
          Reply
        • Steinbrenner2728

          2 hours ago

          That’s if a lockout happens. Other than that, beyond speculation, there’s no risk of a lockout, no matter how much you want it to happen, Simm.

          3
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 hours ago

          Deferrals are absolutely guaranteed. Neither lockouts nor natural disasters can erase a deferral contract.

          1
          Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          1 hour ago

          @Gwynning You are a very fair person and would make an awesome teammate. You put the rest of us to shame. Cheers my brother, may your Padres be stalwarts of the offseason!

          1
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 hour ago

          Back at ya Iggy! Good luck M’s.
          😎🤙🏽🍻

          1
          Reply
        • 28rings

          53 mins ago

          they don’t get paid for games that arent’ played

          Reply
        • Gwynning

          48 mins ago

          Thank me later when the “Shohei still Collects the Bag in ’26” articles come out, but no sooner please. 🍻

          Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      3 hours ago

      You think a player strike will last an entire season or more?

      3
      Reply
      • Gwynning

        3 hours ago

        No, I dont. Either way ybc. (strike vs. Lockout)

        5
        Reply
        • Gwynning

          3 hours ago

          Nobody will sit on the Golden Goose for a full 162… but both sides will posture on “lost games” to swing the pendulum.

          7
          Reply
        • Chicken In Philly?

          3 hours ago

          When it comes to a salary cap, a lost season is absolutely on the table.

          1
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 hours ago

          Well, not debating you per se Chicky, but that’d be silly. A lost season wouldn’t guarantee any sort of Cap or Floor… and the rift created would be tumultuous at best.

          2
          Reply
        • Rsox

          2 hours ago

          They wouldn’t cancel a season over a pandemic, they aren’t going to cancel one over greed on either side. The financial losses would be catastrophic and not even a steroid infused Home Run chase would be able to save them this time around

          3
          Reply
        • Chicken In Philly?

          2 hours ago

          Players and agents are preparing for a lockout. Manfred has stated that the game need both a floor and a cap, supposedly listening to fans of small market teams. Until MLB shows what the Nuttings and Fischers are taking home year after year, the players have no reason to accept either.

          1
          Reply
        • Simm

          2 hours ago

          Chicken, zero chance there is a cap without them showing the books.

          Even with a lockout I don’t see a cap being the result.

          1
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 hours ago

          Not really disagreeing with you Chicky, but I think “most” players would just settle on a new de facto CBA… and resume the paychecks.

          1
          Reply
        • ASTROS27!

          2 hours ago

          Floor=125MM
          Cap=350MM

          Reply
        • Simm

          2 hours ago

          Gwynning, I see some changes but mainly around the luxury tax. Teams can alter it to me more like a cap. The players will likely take a bit of a hit doing so.

          With that said the players will also get some things they want in return. Perhaps like eliminating the QO. They can remove the loss of picks while still giving teams picks for losing players.

          There are many different items that can be given and taken. An actual cap seems to be off the table. Which means they will eventually come to some sort of a deal. Could see a shorter season or schedule modification

          2
          Reply
        • ASTROS27!

          2 hours ago

          But I still feel like a cap is bad.

          Reply
        • ASTROS27!

          2 hours ago

          1. Reduce the sharing amounts from 48% to 25%/Add Floor
          2. Keep most rules and stuff
          3. Add a structure for pre-arb players.

          Reply
        • Simm

          2 hours ago

          Astros- zero chance they have a floor that high and a cap that high.

          NFL doesn’t even have a cap nearly that high.

          To have a cap they first would be looking at revenue sharing.

          Reply
        • ASTROS27!

          2 hours ago

          Okay. Thanks for the feedback.

          2
          Reply
        • Gwynning

          2 hours ago

          Concur on almost all your points, Simm. For the life of me, I just can *never* see the League opening their books up, and that would be a Player’s Union requirement. Ain’t happening… but after some give and take, back and forth, some games lost… both sides will proclaim that they fought for their rights and “won” the battle. Until the next CBA, ad infinitum.

          1
          Reply
        • ASTROS27!

          2 hours ago

          Interesting. But the next thing we are looking at is 3:00 on the west coast, 4:00 for the mountain, 5:00 for the central, and 6:00 to the east. 40 man deadlines.

          1
          Reply
        • Chris from NJ

          2 hours ago

          I get what you are saying but Grisham took the 22 and change and will try to reproduce something similar. If he doesn’t it’s not such a loss for him with the QO in the bank, if he does he be rightly paid. Win win for Grisham lock out or not.

          Reply
        • ASTROS27!

          1 hour ago

          Yeah. He probably thought of that last second or maybe agent told him

          Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 hour ago

          Well Chris, the counter-argument is Grish turns back into a pumpkin and never comes close to his “current” strong bartering position. Moot point now, I know. But in that case, definitely not a win/win for Grish and he impacts his future earnings potential.

          Reply
        • brucenewton

          1 hour ago

          Caps and floors are within 20% of each other.

          Reply
        • ASTROS27!

          1 hour ago

          Interesting. It will either favor the high paying teams/low paying teams/middle paying team

          Reply
      • ASTROS27!

        3 hours ago

        It could just be one prime season. We’ll see next season

        Reply
      • foppert3

        1 hour ago

        Lockout for as long as it takes. The evidence suggests the have nots are not making money anyway. Sitting it out might be saving them money.

        Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          1 hour ago

          @foppert3 What evidence? Only the Braves have their books wide open for public view. Non-competitive organizations don’t necessarily need to make YoY profits. Team valuations will continue to rise as long as the MLB economy is churning.

          1
          Reply
        • Simm

          59 mins ago

          Yeah I’m not really sure what he means by have nots? You talking the Pirates? Who most reports say are making money.

          The reason for a cap is to even the playing field. To do so it would require 100% revenue sharing. It’s less about who is among and not making money. More about who can afford certain players and still make some money.

          If they do 100% revenue sharing I don’t even care if someone goes over the cap and pays another 100% tax on the overages. It would either eat up the owners remaining profits or have the owner dip into their own pockets. Which is fair either way to me.

          With that said I still don’t see a cap. I actually don’t even think you need one if you do 100% revenue sharing. You would need a floor in that case though.

          Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          55 mins ago

          All these owners are brilliant business men, or have at least learned all the tricks that worked for Daddy and Grandaddy. Even if they are owners of teams with not much interest in winning, they at least want to make a buck. Even these crap-a$$ owners didn’t buy into the MLB to lose money.

          1
          Reply
    • GabeOfThrones

      2 hours ago

      100% in agreement with Simm here. I think without looming labor issues, there’s no way he accepts a QO after the season he just had. He was looking at at least $60-80m in FA.

      1
      Reply
      • Gwynning

        53 mins ago

        Bank on the early boatload of cash, bet on the future non-QO-attached Free Agency to unravel however it may, murky time period or not. I get it, and more power to him!

        Reply
  3. mlbnyyfan

    3 hours ago

    That really ruined my week. thank you cashman for offering it to him

    1
    Reply
    • hiflew

      3 hours ago

      You signing the checks now?

      10
      Reply
      • BeenThereDoneIt

        2 hours ago

        He is a horribad player. Below average in every way

        1
        Reply
        • KnicksFanCavsFan

          29 mins ago

          14% walk rate, 23%k rate, 34 homers, and decent defense is below average?

          Reply
  4. angryyankeesfan1

    3 hours ago

    Well this is awkward

    3
    Reply
  5. Jdt8312

    3 hours ago

    I told you so

    Reply
    • Mengis2

      1 hour ago

      yeah, so? This shouldn’t surprise anybody, really. If he reverts to what he was before last season, yankees have never been shy about cutting guys loose on 1 yr deals.

      Reply
  6. humbb

    3 hours ago

    Ooh, I don’t think the Yankees really wanted that.

    1
    Reply
    • Jay D

      2 hours ago

      they didn’t do it for the 5th round draft pick compensation.. he’s overpaid but for one year its fine.

      Reply
    • yanks2323

      1 hour ago

      If they didn’t want that, they shouldn’t have offered it. They will forever have QO remorse! Another bullseye by a GM where the games has passed him by

      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        23 mins ago

        @Yanks

        There’s no pleasing Yankee fans. Cashman got 60 homers out of 3 guys no one even expected would make the team or have a big impact like Rice and Grisham. Got Beli who many thought was washed. Traded for Jazz who became a 30/30 guy, yet yall still have so much doubt. Grisham was a former 1st round pick who showed flashes of ability (multiple years of double digit homers) that maybe, maybe is realizing his potential. Give him a shot to prove himself and if he fails then it’s only money and you key him walk. If he had another great start and Spencer Jones forces himself to get called up then that’s what’s none as a “good problem” to have.

        2
        Reply
  7. YankeesBleacherCreature

    3 hours ago

    Grissshhhh!

    5
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      3 hours ago

      Still available for your trade offers to me… and before we get too deep in the weeds regarding other players involved, I’m still probably rejecting all proposals. 🤪🍻🤣

      5
      Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        52 mins ago

        Settle down! It’ll come. We’re neck deep right now with the Rule 5 draft looming.

        2
        Reply
        • Gwynning

          45 mins ago

          How much for that Spencer Jones in the window? And no we’re not taking Grish as a balancer… 😆

          Lmao since “Settle down!” 🤣

          2
          Reply
  8. Bob Sacamano 310

    3 hours ago

    So Grisham in CF, sign Belli for LF, and then what happens to Jasson? Bench/platoon? Chances are, Stanton will get injured and ABs will open at the DH spot.

    1
    Reply
    • mostlytoasty

      3 hours ago

      Jasson seems like the most obvious sell piece now to help them out elsewhere IMO (likely in a package). I personally think he’s being undervalued by most fans and folks here based off previous comments

      Reply
      • ellisburks

        2 hours ago

        He is less than MLB average. It was his first season but there isn’t much to get excited about with him. No power decent base stealer, terrible fielder. Get what you can for him.

        Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          52 mins ago

          I think Rice is a goner too, but Yanks will get a nice piece for him in return. Clearing 1B for Alonso or Bryce Harper.

          Reply
  9. ASTROS27!

    3 hours ago

    Thank God

    Reply
  10. chandlerbing

    3 hours ago

    4 QO accepted today
    thats gotta be a record for 1 offseason

    4
    Reply
    • Bob Sacamano 310

      3 hours ago

      Think I just heard there’s only been 14 accepted ever and 4 are this offseason.

      1
      Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      3 hours ago

      Bellinger definitely not coming back. Trade Dominez and others for Kwan. it’s only tuesday and my week is ruined. so much for him wanting long term security.

      1
      Reply
      • Rsox

        2 hours ago

        That “long term security” was probably offered at a less cumulative rate than one year of the QO

        1
        Reply
      • ExileInLA 2

        2 hours ago

        $22mm in one year means he nets $10mm+ after taxes and agent.

        That sure sounds like long term security to me, especially after making $13.6 mm over the past three years (which should have paid for a nice house, college for any kids, and $1mm+ retirement savings at age 29)

        1
        Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          45 mins ago

          Geez I didn’t make my first 22 million until at least year 5 or 6. The kids these days don’t know how to work, put in the least amount of effort. I had to walk five miles in hip-deep snow just to meet my Car Pool back in the day.

          1
          Reply
      • Mengis2

        1 hour ago

        you are taking this way too hard,. a one-year contract is never a big deal for anybody

        1
        Reply
    • ASTROS27!

      3 hours ago

      It is

      Reply
  11. Seamaholic

    3 hours ago

    Money’s not there. This is a HUGE red flag for the rest of the class.

    Reply
    • Chicken In Philly?

      2 hours ago

      Or just an accepted likelihood that these guys were looking at 2-3 year deals, with one of those years likely being lost to a lockout.

      2
      Reply
      • Steinbrenner2728

        2 hours ago

        “with one of those years likely being lost to a lockout.”

        Scares me to think actual human beings comment these things.

        4
        Reply
  12. ASTROS27!

    3 hours ago

    Qualifying Offer Chart

    Kyle Schwarber-
    Kyle Tucker-
    Framber Valdez-
    Dylan Cease-
    Michael King-
    Ranger Suarez-
    Bo Bitchette=
    Edwin Diaz-
    Zac Gallen=
    Trent Grisham-Accepted
    Gleyber Torres-Accepted
    Shota Imanaga-Accepted
    Brandron Woodruff-Accepted

    Reply
    • Seamaholic

      3 hours ago

      Watch out for Gallen. He was really bad for much of last year and his market might not be there. Everyone else is a guaranteed no.

      Reply
      • ASTROS27!

        3 hours ago

        The deadline passed. The only one I would give the Astros a red alert is Zac Gallen and possibly Michael King.

        Reply
    • ASTROS27!

      3 hours ago

      mlbtraderumors.com/2025/11/nine-players-reject-qua…

      Reply
  13. SandlotBenchWarmer

    3 hours ago

    Did not see this happening.

    1
    Reply
    • Rsox

      2 hours ago

      Even Stevie Wonder saw this happening…

      5
      Reply
  14. GeoEng88

    3 hours ago

    Awful news

    Reply
  15. rhandome

    3 hours ago

    I’d say he got screwed over by the qualifying offer more than anyone else this year.

    That’s my problem with the QO… all the negative effects fall on a few free agents who are in that borderline area.

    Also wasn’t the original point of the QO, and type A/B free agents before it, to compensate teams for losing HOME-GROWN players? Seems like that original purpose has been lost.

    1
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      2 hours ago

      Yeah, getting upwards of $22MM to play some ball next year reallyyyy screwed him over…

      5
      Reply
    • BeenThereDoneIt

      2 hours ago

      Screwed over for 22 million when he shouldn’t even be making 5 million? Yeah, I think he’s good

      1
      Reply
  16. ctyank7

    3 hours ago

    Sad. The Yankees can now kiss goodbye any chance of reupping with. Bellinger. Food Stamps Hal has set his budget limits.

    The GM for life got conned into believing an outlier season by a .235 career hitter was the real Trent Grisham — not the .213 hitter who averaged 11 homers in his previous six MLB seasons.

    One more reason why other front office execs laugh at Brian Cashman.

    3
    Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      2 hours ago

      Why would Steinbrenner be okay with offering him this in the first place??? a draft pick gamble

      1
      Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      2 hours ago

      They’re still going to attempt to re-sign Belli.

      If you ignore Grisham’s ’25 peripheral stats, you may be correct.

      6
      Reply
      • ctyank7

        2 hours ago

        When the coach turns back into a pumpkin — or when Grisham reverts to being less than ordinary — the Yankees will be stuck with a $22 million benchwarmer clogging up the payroll.

        Even worse, they’ll do it while watching Bellinger star for either the Dodgers or Phillies.

        1
        Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      17 mins ago

      Imho, the Yankees are taking the anticipated approach this year – they are going to re-establish last year’s team (or as close to possible), and not give out any longer-term contracts in anticipation of a work stoppage. They will then have a significant amount coming off the books in ‘28, and are planning on the possibility of getting their much-desired cap implemented.

      Although Hal isn’t cheap in its truest sense, there are certainly valid questions about the amount he puts back into the team. For example, LAD is putting back roughly 73% of its revenue into the team, while the Yankees are putting about 47% back into the team, which puts them at 16th iirc.

      To me, this is the true formula for Hal, not a specific number, ie, 300MM. Instead, I believe his direction is to remain under 50% of the revenue back into the on-field product.

      Moreover, I’ve seen recent reports that “internal sources” have said Hal claims the Yankees are losing money each year. While I find that extremely far-fetched, I think it provides insight into Hal’s spending mentality.

      It’s clear the Yankees have transitioned to a profit-first team, and only when that goal is achieved will they prioritize winning. The part of the formula Hal simply doesn’t realize is that winning will increase the probability that he raises revenue…

      Reply
  17. KnicksFanCavsFan

    3 hours ago

    I’m good with this. I’d rather they risk overpaying Grisham for 1 year and bringing back Belli and Dominguez than entertain Tucker for anywhere near the $350-$400 they’ve been rumored to seek in free agency. Tucker hasn’t been elite level since 2023.

    4
    Reply
    • Begamin

      2 hours ago

      You didnt need to block your top prospect in order to overpay Trent Grisham. This also probably prevents Yankees from going after Belli (the better player) or Bichette

      Yankees didnt need to go after Tucker, and this move still sucks.

      1
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        2 hours ago

        Considering the recent injuries the Yanks have suffered in consecutive years in not sure why you think they couldn’t bring back Beli AND, inevitably find at bats for Dominguez. Rice gets hurt, move Beli to 1st. Stanton, Judge or Beli get injured, Dominguez to OF/DH. Beli decides to go elsewhere or pushes Cash to the limit of what he wants to offer, then they have 3 OF under contract. $$$$$ is Cash’s best tool. Make it rain.

        2
        Reply
      • Mengis2

        1 hour ago

        not sure why some think bringing back Grisham means everything is now set in stone, And Jones is not the top prospect. With his swing and miss rates, he isn’t a top prospect at all, really.

        Reply
        • KnicksFanCavsFan

          43 mins ago

          @Mengis

          The top 4 leaders in strikeouts collectively had 175 homers, 4 all- appearances and 1 top 3 mvp finish. The idea that Spencer Jones can’t succeed at the mlb level because he might strikeout 200x isn’t accurate. He did hand a walk rate of 15% and he might benefit from coaching at the mlb level and facing pitchers who might throw more strikes in the bigs. Still, I would temper my expectations more than others. I’d make him force his way on to the team. But he is absolutely a top prospect.

          1
          Reply
  18. nyjoe317

    3 hours ago

    This team and everyone running it is an embarrassment. This guy was a one year wonder and Spencer Jones is 25 and still won’t get a shot in CF and he’s f they strike next year Jones will be 27 when he next gets a shot. Ridiculous just trade him. If your a prospect you have almost no shot on this team ever

    Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      2 hours ago

      Yankees could lose Spencer Jones in the Rule 5 draft unless they add him to the 40-man roster. His numbers at Double-A Somerset scream Dave Kingman.

      2
      Reply
      • Mengis2

        57 mins ago

        I think Jones would be very fortunate to have Dave Kingman’s career. I can’t think of any guys who made it with his K rates in the minors..

        1
        Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        35 mins ago

        There’s zero chance the Yanks won’t add him to the 40. He’s no 9th round pick that came out of nowhere. He was their #1 pick like 3 years ago haha.

        Reply
    • Scott Costello

      2 hours ago

      And if they some how give you a shot, show promise they will screw you up by telling you to only try and hit HRs

      Reply
    • KnicksFanCavsFan

      37 mins ago

      @nyjoe

      Look out for Volpe, Wells, Rice, Dominguez, Gil,Schmidt, Warren, Schlittler and Cabrera next time you watch a game. What are you talking about? Jones has only played 75 games at AAA. He had obvious flaws. Start him at AAA and make him force his way to the bigs. He’ll only be 25 in May. Relax. Grish is only signed for 1 more year.

      Reply
  19. Rsox

    3 hours ago

    Grisham had long enough to gauge the market and realize that everyone viewed last season as an outlier. Do it again next year and maybe, just maybe teams will think differently

    2
    Reply
  20. Begamin

    3 hours ago

    yankees are coming into this offseason with 40MM in wiggle room if we go off of Hal publicly saying he wants to stay under 300MM

    we just blocked Spencer Jones AGAIN for 22 million when we should he throwing the brinks truck at Bo Bichette

    1
    Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      2 hours ago

      Spencer Jones ain’t even on the 40-man roster. You want a Three True Outcomes type to take up a space on the major league roster?

      1
      Reply
  21. BashBroJoe

    3 hours ago

    I had all of these guys accepting along with King and Gallen. Surprised they didn’t honestly.

    Reply
  22. Never Remember

    2 hours ago

    Sorry Yankees you are stuck with him. Bad gamble by Cashman

    2
    Reply
  23. chrcritter

    2 hours ago

    good for him, never gonna get that $$ in an offer, bad for the Yankees

    3
    Reply
  24. slider32

    2 hours ago

    22 million is a lot of money, 4 players accepting is a record. I think the Yanks still sign Bellinger,, Grish is only for a year. If they don’t get him they will still upgrade with pitching.

    2
    Reply
  25. nyjoe317

    2 hours ago

    Just what they need another guy who hits .220-.240 even having a career year. This team biggest problem is they have 2 guys on the entire roster who can hit over .250

    2
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      1 hour ago

      Batting average, how quaint. Now do RBIs!

      Reply
  26. Digdugler

    2 hours ago

    $22m is $22m. Grisham, Shota, these guys werent going to get $22M a year long term.

    2
    Reply
  27. Acoss1331

    2 hours ago

    I still think Yankees re-sign Bellinger. I don’t think Grisham was worth the QO. Probably means the Yankees are trading either Spencer Jones or Dominguez with the crowded outfield now.

    2
    Reply
  28. Mikenmn

    2 hours ago

    It makes sense for both Grisham and the Yankees. At worst (assuming no injuries) he’ll man CF decently, he has some pop. At best, he could repeat 2025. He’s going to be overpaid, but it’s one year. Grisham gets a check a lot bigger for 2026 than he could expect on the market, and a chance to go back into the market without the QO, and having banked a good payday. The Yankees can now focus on different things. They might be mildly surprised he took them up on it, but they wouldn’t have made the offer if they didn’t expect it.

    3
    Reply
    • Scott Costello

      2 hours ago

      Now they can focus on spending 22mm less and blocking young guys.

      Reply
  29. Cubfan-945

    2 hours ago

    Two more teams out of Tucker sweepstakes: Yankees and Tigers! No way Yankees sign Cody and Tucker now.

    Reply
  30. dbdmack

    2 hours ago

    NY was probably hoping he would not accept and they’d get a pick. Woodruff surprises me.

    Reply
  31. Salzilla

    2 hours ago

    Interesting. It could’ve went either way with Grisham, but I had him going elsewhere (Phillies, even though they need a RHB). I secretly hoped he was too, as even though I enjoyed his contributions last season, I don’t know if I neccessarily trust it was real. I now know he doesn’t trust that either! Either way, welcome back I guess!

    3
    Reply
  32. hiflew

    2 hours ago

    If a team CAN end up in the top tier penalty stage 4 years in a row, perhaps the penalty needs to be stronger.

    2
    Reply
  33. yick04

    2 hours ago

    I guess he wasn’t ready to ditch the moustache.

    Reply
  34. Captainmike1

    2 hours ago

    This sucks
    I really wanted Jone and Jasson in the outfield not Trent

    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      1 hour ago

      Sucks? Dude balled out down the stretch when Aaron was on the mend and Cody was doing Cody Spicolli things, letting fly balls bounce over his head. # entitled

      Reply
  35. fearthecub

    2 hours ago

    I didn’t think he’d outright accept the QO, but I did think he’d negotiate some type of extension to return to NY.

    Reply
  36. Scott Costello

    2 hours ago

    I knew this would bite the Yankees in the butt. Let’s get ready for a 220 avg, 15 HRs and an OPS below 700. And his defense will surely decline. This off season is going to be another one of those “role it back”. Ones.

    3
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      1 hour ago

      Except for the fact he mashed 34 and .812 OPS, you’re not very far off

      Reply
      • Salzilla

        54 mins ago

        No one trusts that based on his career stats.

        Reply
        • Dumpster Divin Theo

          7 mins ago

          Only one year..

          Reply
  37. dlj0527

    2 hours ago

    Never seen many of his games so based on his stats, I assume he has stuck around MLB for his glove and finally managed to start hitting homers this past season.

    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      1 hour ago

      Uh, what?

      Reply
  38. Dumpster Divin Theo

    1 hour ago

    Good signing. Welcome back to the Firm.

    2
    Reply
  39. dirtbagbaseball427

    1 hour ago

    Prepare for a very similar looking offensive product next season Yankee fans…lots of homers (vs Bad pitching), lots of strikeouts (Vs good pitching), and lack of timely hits and productive outs…also, I know you’re still waiting for the second coming of Trout/Mantle, Dominguez to have a real role on this team. Looks like you’ll have to wait some more or he’ll have a spot on someone else’s team so Cashman can trade for another all or nothing type of hitter…

    1
    Reply
  40. kodion

    1 hour ago

    Sorry, Yankee fans but there are only two things good about this deal: It’s only one season and it puts me at .800 through 5 picks in the FA contest!!!

    2
    Reply
  41. swanhenge

    54 mins ago

    From another angle, as a GM would you sacrifice a draft pick to sign Grish to a multi year deal? No freakin way. His agent knew that. Go back to NYY, post decent stats and hit the market next year.

    ….to sign a multi year deal for about $22M, lol

    Reply
  42. Sterlingadingadong

    39 mins ago

    This kinda screws the whole offseason. What happens now? I like Grish but, don’t see how this will help outfield and blocks a lot of moves.
    Well, there’s always 2027

    Reply
  43. padam

    24 mins ago

    Teams weren’t going to buy in on his season and I think he and his agent knew that. Reality is he’s getting paid for two seasons in one. Win for him and a gamble for the Yanks. That’s money that could’ve gone elsewhere.

    1
    Reply
  44. KnicksFanCavsFan

    8 mins ago

    Some of my fellow Yankee fans are goofy. Baseball is filled with late boomers that took a few years to come into their own. Grish was a 1st overall pick and did have a few years of double digit homers. What I like was his walk rate and power. It’s a 1 year deal. No biggie.

    Reply
  45. brucenewton

    6 mins ago

    Yanks going to run it back another year older.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Astros Designate Ramon Urias For Assignment

    Nine Players Reject Qualifying Offer

    Trent Grisham To Accept Qualifying Offer

    Gleyber Torres To Accept Qualifying Offer

    Shota Imanaga To Accept Cubs’ Qualifying Offer

    Brandon Woodruff Accepts Qualifying Offer

    Mets To Release Frankie Montas, Select Nick Morabito

    Rangers Shopping Jonah Heim, Adolis Garcia

    Red Sox Designate Nathaniel Lowe, Josh Winckowski For Assignment

    Mariners Re-Sign Josh Naylor

    Yankees To Re-Sign Ryan Yarbrough

    MLBTR Free Agent Prediction Contest Now Closed

    Mets Fielding Interest In Jeff McNeil

    Brad Keller Drawing Interest As Starting Pitcher

    Aaron Judge Wins AL MVP Award

    Shohei Ohtani Wins NL MVP Award

    Kris Bubic Drawing Trade Interest From Multiple Clubs

    Brewers President Downplays Possibility Of Freddy Peralta Trade

    Seidler Family Exploring Potential Sale Of Padres

    Astros GM: “No Interest” In Trading Isaac Paredes

    Recent

    Rangers Select Three Players To 40-Man Roster

    Rays To Acquire Yoendrys Gomez From White Sox

    Yankees Select Spencer Jones, Elmer Rodriguez, Chase Hampton

    Phillies Select Andrew Painter, Two Others

    Mariners To Acquire Alex Hoppe

    D-Backs Select Four Players, Designate Tommy Henry

    Royals Select Ben Kudrna, Steven Zobac

    Guardians Designate Nic Enright, Select Four Players

    Cardinals Select Four Players

    Rockies To Acquire Brennan Bernardino

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version