Outfielder Trent Grisham is accepting his $22.025MM qualifying offer and will return to the Yankees in 2026, reports ESPN’s Jorge Castillo. Players who accept a QO are considered free agent signings and are thus ineligible to be traded prior to the following June 15 unless they consent to the move.
It’s at least a modest surprise, as Grisham is coming off a breakout year at the plate which saw him club a career-high 34 home runs. He slashed .235/.348/.464, thanks in no small part to a career-best 14.1% walk rate and a 23.6% strikeout rate that stood as the second-lowest in his career. Between that production, the fact that Grisham only just turned 29 earlier this month, and a thin outfield market in free agency, the stars seemed to align for him to pursue a weighty multi-year contract this winter.
Instead, Grisham returns to the site of his breakout and will hold down a key role in an outfield that’s also currently slated to include Jasson Dominguez and Aaron Judge. The Yankees are interested in re-signing Cody Bellinger, have been linked to Kyle Tucker and also have DH Giancarlo Stanton at least loosely in the outfield mix. (He played 132 outfield innings in 2025.)
Grisham’s return muddies the waters a bit, but GM Brian Cashman said recently that even if he accepted, it wouldn’t impact the team’s pursuit of a new deal with Bellinger (link via the New York Post’s Greg Joyce). The Yankees wouldn’t have made the QO to Grisham if they believed his acceptance was a roadblock to bringing back Bellinger or signing Tucker. They’re surely glad to have him back. Even though his defensive grades took an unexpected downturn in ’25, he has the best defensive track record in center of the Yankees’ in-house options.
While Grisham could have looked to cash in this winter, he’ll instead take a hefty one-year payday in what amounts to a bet on himself. Though he’s a left-handed bat, his power output was hardly a product of Yankee Stadium’s short right field porch. In fact, Grisham hit just .195/.326/.376 at home this season, compared to .254/.364/.506 on the road. If he can replicate this year’s huge power production, he could hit the market next offseason on the back of consecutive plus seasons at the plate and without the encumbrance of a qualifying offer. A big enough showing this year could realistically position Grisham for a $100MM+ contract — particularly if his defensive grades rebound, too.
The looming potential for a work stoppage is one other wrinkle to consider, but if anything, today’s glut of QO decisions suggests that players aren’t necessarily going to shy away from short-term deals that put them on the open market next year — at least not en masse. Grisham is one of four players to accept the QO, joining Gleyber Torres, Shota Imanaga and Brandon Woodruff in that regard. In a vacuum, any one of the four accepting his QO wouldn’t be considered a major surprise — but all four accepting in the same offseason is downright atypical. This marks the first time since the inception of the qualifying offer that more than three players have accepted a QO.
With Grisham back in the fold, the Yankees’ projected payroll for the upcoming season jumps to about $263MM, per RosterResource. They’ll now have about $286MM of luxury tax obligations, placing them just over the third penalty line. That means that the Yankees’ top pick in the 2026 draft will drop by 10 places, unless they’re able to sneak their luxury count back under $284MM. Given the wide swath of offseason dealings that’s likely still on the table for Cashman & Co., that doesn’t seem to be a very likely outcome. In all likelihood, the Yankees will wind up in the top CBT penalty tier, just as they’ve done in each of the past three seasons.
Turning to the rest of the league, Grisham’s early removal from the free agent market — to a team that didn’t clearly need to retain him, no less — subtracts arguably the top center field option from the market. Bellinger, of course, can still play center but barely did so in 2025. Most teams probably consider him more of a corner outfielder/first baseman who can play occasional center field. Harrison Bader and Cedric Mullins are the two most notable options still on the market, though the former has been more of a part-time player and the latter is looking to bounce back from an awful 2025 showing. The market was light on center fielders to begin with and is even more so now, so teams looking for help at the position might be more inclined to turn to the trade market to address that deficiency.


He’s back.
This was the most obvious “accept” for me, at least this year.
Same
I would have thought Gleyber. I had Grisham at 50-50.
I thought Trent Grisham should accept, but I didn’t think he would
Agreed. My list was Gleyber, Grisham, no one.
As a Yankee fan I’m cool with him back on a 1 year deal. I don’t know if it was the hammy but his D really fell off. Hopefully he comes in playing elite CF. He seems too young for his modest speed to be gone.
[Ryan O’Neil has entered that chat] And strained a lat in the process. Will be out 3-4 weeks.
Acting is hard work. Too bad Tyler strained an eyeball reading this!
Ouch
@gwynning. This might be the year you dont want a pick attached. Best to take the one year deal. Next year might not be better just feel like he was going to get squeezed out regardless.
You’d prefer to be an unpaid FA during a Lockout? No spotlight on you or wrong answer, Huds… just saying.
He wont hit 10 home runs in 2026, after is PEDs wear off.
He’s hit more than 10 homers several times in his career with the Padres.
Players are definitely taking the money upfront over 2-3 year deals because of the possible lockout
Seems counterintuitive? I’d rather sign a 3yr/$50MM than a 1yr/$22MM if there’s an imminent Lockout… then again, nobody’s holding my feet to the flame!
Nah because if they get zero next year getting the money upfront helps more
3yr/$50MM would be guaranteed. Lockout or not.
If they miss games because of a lockout they aren’t being paid
Well, they can… just depends on your contract. Deferrals still get paid, even in a Lockout. Just have to be creative in your approach, but I’m not passing judgment on their 1yr approach. Good for all the players!
I do not believe so. If, say, the league loses an entire year, than the players lose that year as well.
That’s if a lockout happens. Other than that, beyond speculation, there’s no risk of a lockout, no matter how much you want it to happen, Simm.
Deferrals are absolutely guaranteed. Neither lockouts nor natural disasters can erase a deferral contract.
@Gwynning You are a very fair person and would make an awesome teammate. You put the rest of us to shame. Cheers my brother, may your Padres be stalwarts of the offseason!
Back at ya Iggy! Good luck M’s.
😎🤙🏽🍻
they don’t get paid for games that arent’ played
Thank me later when the “Shohei still Collects the Bag in ’26” articles come out, but no sooner please. 🍻
You think a player strike will last an entire season or more?
No, I dont. Either way ybc. (strike vs. Lockout)
Nobody will sit on the Golden Goose for a full 162… but both sides will posture on “lost games” to swing the pendulum.
When it comes to a salary cap, a lost season is absolutely on the table.
Well, not debating you per se Chicky, but that’d be silly. A lost season wouldn’t guarantee any sort of Cap or Floor… and the rift created would be tumultuous at best.
They wouldn’t cancel a season over a pandemic, they aren’t going to cancel one over greed on either side. The financial losses would be catastrophic and not even a steroid infused Home Run chase would be able to save them this time around
Players and agents are preparing for a lockout. Manfred has stated that the game need both a floor and a cap, supposedly listening to fans of small market teams. Until MLB shows what the Nuttings and Fischers are taking home year after year, the players have no reason to accept either.
Chicken, zero chance there is a cap without them showing the books.
Even with a lockout I don’t see a cap being the result.
Not really disagreeing with you Chicky, but I think “most” players would just settle on a new de facto CBA… and resume the paychecks.
Floor=125MM
Cap=350MM
Gwynning, I see some changes but mainly around the luxury tax. Teams can alter it to me more like a cap. The players will likely take a bit of a hit doing so.
With that said the players will also get some things they want in return. Perhaps like eliminating the QO. They can remove the loss of picks while still giving teams picks for losing players.
There are many different items that can be given and taken. An actual cap seems to be off the table. Which means they will eventually come to some sort of a deal. Could see a shorter season or schedule modification
But I still feel like a cap is bad.
1. Reduce the sharing amounts from 48% to 25%/Add Floor
2. Keep most rules and stuff
3. Add a structure for pre-arb players.
Astros- zero chance they have a floor that high and a cap that high.
NFL doesn’t even have a cap nearly that high.
To have a cap they first would be looking at revenue sharing.
Okay. Thanks for the feedback.
Concur on almost all your points, Simm. For the life of me, I just can *never* see the League opening their books up, and that would be a Player’s Union requirement. Ain’t happening… but after some give and take, back and forth, some games lost… both sides will proclaim that they fought for their rights and “won” the battle. Until the next CBA, ad infinitum.
Interesting. But the next thing we are looking at is 3:00 on the west coast, 4:00 for the mountain, 5:00 for the central, and 6:00 to the east. 40 man deadlines.
I get what you are saying but Grisham took the 22 and change and will try to reproduce something similar. If he doesn’t it’s not such a loss for him with the QO in the bank, if he does he be rightly paid. Win win for Grisham lock out or not.
Yeah. He probably thought of that last second or maybe agent told him
Well Chris, the counter-argument is Grish turns back into a pumpkin and never comes close to his “current” strong bartering position. Moot point now, I know. But in that case, definitely not a win/win for Grish and he impacts his future earnings potential.
Caps and floors are within 20% of each other.
Interesting. It will either favor the high paying teams/low paying teams/middle paying team
It could just be one prime season. We’ll see next season
Lockout for as long as it takes. The evidence suggests the have nots are not making money anyway. Sitting it out might be saving them money.
@foppert3 What evidence? Only the Braves have their books wide open for public view. Non-competitive organizations don’t necessarily need to make YoY profits. Team valuations will continue to rise as long as the MLB economy is churning.
Yeah I’m not really sure what he means by have nots? You talking the Pirates? Who most reports say are making money.
The reason for a cap is to even the playing field. To do so it would require 100% revenue sharing. It’s less about who is among and not making money. More about who can afford certain players and still make some money.
If they do 100% revenue sharing I don’t even care if someone goes over the cap and pays another 100% tax on the overages. It would either eat up the owners remaining profits or have the owner dip into their own pockets. Which is fair either way to me.
With that said I still don’t see a cap. I actually don’t even think you need one if you do 100% revenue sharing. You would need a floor in that case though.
All these owners are brilliant business men, or have at least learned all the tricks that worked for Daddy and Grandaddy. Even if they are owners of teams with not much interest in winning, they at least want to make a buck. Even these crap-a$$ owners didn’t buy into the MLB to lose money.
100% in agreement with Simm here. I think without looming labor issues, there’s no way he accepts a QO after the season he just had. He was looking at at least $60-80m in FA.
Bank on the early boatload of cash, bet on the future non-QO-attached Free Agency to unravel however it may, murky time period or not. I get it, and more power to him!
That really ruined my week. thank you cashman for offering it to him
You signing the checks now?
He is a horribad player. Below average in every way
14% walk rate, 23%k rate, 34 homers, and decent defense is below average?
Well this is awkward
I told you so
yeah, so? This shouldn’t surprise anybody, really. If he reverts to what he was before last season, yankees have never been shy about cutting guys loose on 1 yr deals.
Ooh, I don’t think the Yankees really wanted that.
they didn’t do it for the 5th round draft pick compensation.. he’s overpaid but for one year its fine.
If they didn’t want that, they shouldn’t have offered it. They will forever have QO remorse! Another bullseye by a GM where the games has passed him by
@Yanks
There’s no pleasing Yankee fans. Cashman got 60 homers out of 3 guys no one even expected would make the team or have a big impact like Rice and Grisham. Got Beli who many thought was washed. Traded for Jazz who became a 30/30 guy, yet yall still have so much doubt. Grisham was a former 1st round pick who showed flashes of ability (multiple years of double digit homers) that maybe, maybe is realizing his potential. Give him a shot to prove himself and if he fails then it’s only money and you key him walk. If he had another great start and Spencer Jones forces himself to get called up then that’s what’s none as a “good problem” to have.
Grissshhhh!
Still available for your trade offers to me… and before we get too deep in the weeds regarding other players involved, I’m still probably rejecting all proposals. 🤪🍻🤣
Settle down! It’ll come. We’re neck deep right now with the Rule 5 draft looming.
How much for that Spencer Jones in the window? And no we’re not taking Grish as a balancer… 😆
Lmao since “Settle down!” 🤣
So Grisham in CF, sign Belli for LF, and then what happens to Jasson? Bench/platoon? Chances are, Stanton will get injured and ABs will open at the DH spot.
Jasson seems like the most obvious sell piece now to help them out elsewhere IMO (likely in a package). I personally think he’s being undervalued by most fans and folks here based off previous comments
He is less than MLB average. It was his first season but there isn’t much to get excited about with him. No power decent base stealer, terrible fielder. Get what you can for him.
I think Rice is a goner too, but Yanks will get a nice piece for him in return. Clearing 1B for Alonso or Bryce Harper.
Thank God
4 QO accepted today
thats gotta be a record for 1 offseason
Think I just heard there’s only been 14 accepted ever and 4 are this offseason.
Bellinger definitely not coming back. Trade Dominez and others for Kwan. it’s only tuesday and my week is ruined. so much for him wanting long term security.
That “long term security” was probably offered at a less cumulative rate than one year of the QO
$22mm in one year means he nets $10mm+ after taxes and agent.
That sure sounds like long term security to me, especially after making $13.6 mm over the past three years (which should have paid for a nice house, college for any kids, and $1mm+ retirement savings at age 29)
Geez I didn’t make my first 22 million until at least year 5 or 6. The kids these days don’t know how to work, put in the least amount of effort. I had to walk five miles in hip-deep snow just to meet my Car Pool back in the day.
you are taking this way too hard,. a one-year contract is never a big deal for anybody
It is
Money’s not there. This is a HUGE red flag for the rest of the class.
Or just an accepted likelihood that these guys were looking at 2-3 year deals, with one of those years likely being lost to a lockout.
“with one of those years likely being lost to a lockout.”
Scares me to think actual human beings comment these things.
Qualifying Offer Chart
Kyle Schwarber-
Kyle Tucker-
Framber Valdez-
Dylan Cease-
Michael King-
Ranger Suarez-
Bo Bitchette=
Edwin Diaz-
Zac Gallen=
Trent Grisham-Accepted
Gleyber Torres-Accepted
Shota Imanaga-Accepted
Brandron Woodruff-Accepted
Watch out for Gallen. He was really bad for much of last year and his market might not be there. Everyone else is a guaranteed no.
The deadline passed. The only one I would give the Astros a red alert is Zac Gallen and possibly Michael King.
mlbtraderumors.com/2025/11/nine-players-reject-qua…
Did not see this happening.
Even Stevie Wonder saw this happening…
Awful news
I’d say he got screwed over by the qualifying offer more than anyone else this year.
That’s my problem with the QO… all the negative effects fall on a few free agents who are in that borderline area.
Also wasn’t the original point of the QO, and type A/B free agents before it, to compensate teams for losing HOME-GROWN players? Seems like that original purpose has been lost.
Yeah, getting upwards of $22MM to play some ball next year reallyyyy screwed him over…
Screwed over for 22 million when he shouldn’t even be making 5 million? Yeah, I think he’s good
Sad. The Yankees can now kiss goodbye any chance of reupping with. Bellinger. Food Stamps Hal has set his budget limits.
The GM for life got conned into believing an outlier season by a .235 career hitter was the real Trent Grisham — not the .213 hitter who averaged 11 homers in his previous six MLB seasons.
One more reason why other front office execs laugh at Brian Cashman.
Why would Steinbrenner be okay with offering him this in the first place??? a draft pick gamble
They’re still going to attempt to re-sign Belli.
If you ignore Grisham’s ’25 peripheral stats, you may be correct.
When the coach turns back into a pumpkin — or when Grisham reverts to being less than ordinary — the Yankees will be stuck with a $22 million benchwarmer clogging up the payroll.
Even worse, they’ll do it while watching Bellinger star for either the Dodgers or Phillies.
Imho, the Yankees are taking the anticipated approach this year – they are going to re-establish last year’s team (or as close to possible), and not give out any longer-term contracts in anticipation of a work stoppage. They will then have a significant amount coming off the books in ‘28, and are planning on the possibility of getting their much-desired cap implemented.
Although Hal isn’t cheap in its truest sense, there are certainly valid questions about the amount he puts back into the team. For example, LAD is putting back roughly 73% of its revenue into the team, while the Yankees are putting about 47% back into the team, which puts them at 16th iirc.
To me, this is the true formula for Hal, not a specific number, ie, 300MM. Instead, I believe his direction is to remain under 50% of the revenue back into the on-field product.
Moreover, I’ve seen recent reports that “internal sources” have said Hal claims the Yankees are losing money each year. While I find that extremely far-fetched, I think it provides insight into Hal’s spending mentality.
It’s clear the Yankees have transitioned to a profit-first team, and only when that goal is achieved will they prioritize winning. The part of the formula Hal simply doesn’t realize is that winning will increase the probability that he raises revenue…
I’m good with this. I’d rather they risk overpaying Grisham for 1 year and bringing back Belli and Dominguez than entertain Tucker for anywhere near the $350-$400 they’ve been rumored to seek in free agency. Tucker hasn’t been elite level since 2023.
You didnt need to block your top prospect in order to overpay Trent Grisham. This also probably prevents Yankees from going after Belli (the better player) or Bichette
Yankees didnt need to go after Tucker, and this move still sucks.
Considering the recent injuries the Yanks have suffered in consecutive years in not sure why you think they couldn’t bring back Beli AND, inevitably find at bats for Dominguez. Rice gets hurt, move Beli to 1st. Stanton, Judge or Beli get injured, Dominguez to OF/DH. Beli decides to go elsewhere or pushes Cash to the limit of what he wants to offer, then they have 3 OF under contract. $$$$$ is Cash’s best tool. Make it rain.
not sure why some think bringing back Grisham means everything is now set in stone, And Jones is not the top prospect. With his swing and miss rates, he isn’t a top prospect at all, really.
@Mengis
The top 4 leaders in strikeouts collectively had 175 homers, 4 all- appearances and 1 top 3 mvp finish. The idea that Spencer Jones can’t succeed at the mlb level because he might strikeout 200x isn’t accurate. He did hand a walk rate of 15% and he might benefit from coaching at the mlb level and facing pitchers who might throw more strikes in the bigs. Still, I would temper my expectations more than others. I’d make him force his way on to the team. But he is absolutely a top prospect.
This team and everyone running it is an embarrassment. This guy was a one year wonder and Spencer Jones is 25 and still won’t get a shot in CF and he’s f they strike next year Jones will be 27 when he next gets a shot. Ridiculous just trade him. If your a prospect you have almost no shot on this team ever
Yankees could lose Spencer Jones in the Rule 5 draft unless they add him to the 40-man roster. His numbers at Double-A Somerset scream Dave Kingman.
I think Jones would be very fortunate to have Dave Kingman’s career. I can’t think of any guys who made it with his K rates in the minors..
There’s zero chance the Yanks won’t add him to the 40. He’s no 9th round pick that came out of nowhere. He was their #1 pick like 3 years ago haha.
And if they some how give you a shot, show promise they will screw you up by telling you to only try and hit HRs
@nyjoe
Look out for Volpe, Wells, Rice, Dominguez, Gil,Schmidt, Warren, Schlittler and Cabrera next time you watch a game. What are you talking about? Jones has only played 75 games at AAA. He had obvious flaws. Start him at AAA and make him force his way to the bigs. He’ll only be 25 in May. Relax. Grish is only signed for 1 more year.
Grisham had long enough to gauge the market and realize that everyone viewed last season as an outlier. Do it again next year and maybe, just maybe teams will think differently
yankees are coming into this offseason with 40MM in wiggle room if we go off of Hal publicly saying he wants to stay under 300MM
we just blocked Spencer Jones AGAIN for 22 million when we should he throwing the brinks truck at Bo Bichette
Spencer Jones ain’t even on the 40-man roster. You want a Three True Outcomes type to take up a space on the major league roster?
I had all of these guys accepting along with King and Gallen. Surprised they didn’t honestly.
Sorry Yankees you are stuck with him. Bad gamble by Cashman
good for him, never gonna get that $$ in an offer, bad for the Yankees
22 million is a lot of money, 4 players accepting is a record. I think the Yanks still sign Bellinger,, Grish is only for a year. If they don’t get him they will still upgrade with pitching.
Just what they need another guy who hits .220-.240 even having a career year. This team biggest problem is they have 2 guys on the entire roster who can hit over .250
Batting average, how quaint. Now do RBIs!
$22m is $22m. Grisham, Shota, these guys werent going to get $22M a year long term.
I still think Yankees re-sign Bellinger. I don’t think Grisham was worth the QO. Probably means the Yankees are trading either Spencer Jones or Dominguez with the crowded outfield now.
It makes sense for both Grisham and the Yankees. At worst (assuming no injuries) he’ll man CF decently, he has some pop. At best, he could repeat 2025. He’s going to be overpaid, but it’s one year. Grisham gets a check a lot bigger for 2026 than he could expect on the market, and a chance to go back into the market without the QO, and having banked a good payday. The Yankees can now focus on different things. They might be mildly surprised he took them up on it, but they wouldn’t have made the offer if they didn’t expect it.
Now they can focus on spending 22mm less and blocking young guys.
Two more teams out of Tucker sweepstakes: Yankees and Tigers! No way Yankees sign Cody and Tucker now.
NY was probably hoping he would not accept and they’d get a pick. Woodruff surprises me.
Interesting. It could’ve went either way with Grisham, but I had him going elsewhere (Phillies, even though they need a RHB). I secretly hoped he was too, as even though I enjoyed his contributions last season, I don’t know if I neccessarily trust it was real. I now know he doesn’t trust that either! Either way, welcome back I guess!
If a team CAN end up in the top tier penalty stage 4 years in a row, perhaps the penalty needs to be stronger.
I guess he wasn’t ready to ditch the moustache.
This sucks
I really wanted Jone and Jasson in the outfield not Trent
Sucks? Dude balled out down the stretch when Aaron was on the mend and Cody was doing Cody Spicolli things, letting fly balls bounce over his head. # entitled
I didn’t think he’d outright accept the QO, but I did think he’d negotiate some type of extension to return to NY.
I knew this would bite the Yankees in the butt. Let’s get ready for a 220 avg, 15 HRs and an OPS below 700. And his defense will surely decline. This off season is going to be another one of those “role it back”. Ones.
Except for the fact he mashed 34 and .812 OPS, you’re not very far off
No one trusts that based on his career stats.
Only one year..
Never seen many of his games so based on his stats, I assume he has stuck around MLB for his glove and finally managed to start hitting homers this past season.
Uh, what?
Good signing. Welcome back to the Firm.
Prepare for a very similar looking offensive product next season Yankee fans…lots of homers (vs Bad pitching), lots of strikeouts (Vs good pitching), and lack of timely hits and productive outs…also, I know you’re still waiting for the second coming of Trout/Mantle, Dominguez to have a real role on this team. Looks like you’ll have to wait some more or he’ll have a spot on someone else’s team so Cashman can trade for another all or nothing type of hitter…
Sorry, Yankee fans but there are only two things good about this deal: It’s only one season and it puts me at .800 through 5 picks in the FA contest!!!
From another angle, as a GM would you sacrifice a draft pick to sign Grish to a multi year deal? No freakin way. His agent knew that. Go back to NYY, post decent stats and hit the market next year.
….to sign a multi year deal for about $22M, lol
This kinda screws the whole offseason. What happens now? I like Grish but, don’t see how this will help outfield and blocks a lot of moves.
Well, there’s always 2027
Teams weren’t going to buy in on his season and I think he and his agent knew that. Reality is he’s getting paid for two seasons in one. Win for him and a gamble for the Yanks. That’s money that could’ve gone elsewhere.
Some of my fellow Yankee fans are goofy. Baseball is filled with late boomers that took a few years to come into their own. Grish was a 1st overall pick and did have a few years of double digit homers. What I like was his walk rate and power. It’s a 1 year deal. No biggie.
Yanks going to run it back another year older.