The Padres reunited with Michael King this past week on a three-year deal that offers him the opportunity to opt out in each of the next two offseasons. As noted by Jeff Sanders of the San Diego Union Tribune, however, negotiations between the two sides didn’t kick into gear until very recently.
Sanders notes that president of baseball operations A.J. Preller instructed manager Craig Stammen and pitching coach Ruben Niebla to message King less than two weeks ago to see if King was interested in returning to San Diego. At the outset of the offseason, the right-hander initially preferred a return to the east coast, where he pitched for years with the Yankees after growing up in Rhode Island and going to college in Boston. King indicated to reporters (including Sanders) that while some teams had “blown [him] away” with strong offers, he didn’t believe those teams had the roster and commitment to winning necessary to field a World Series contender in 2026. King added that he was prioritizing winning “for the duration of the contract,” and that he was willing to take less in order to make that happen.
It seems that ended up being what he did with San Diego, which Sanders adds was the only west coast team King had interest in playing for. While King’s $75MM guarantee came in just shy of the $80MM guarantee MLBTR predicted for the right-hander at the outset of the offseason, it’s nonetheless a strong deal given the higher average annual value and opt-out opportunities after each season. With that said, King clearly was trending towards a nine-figure contract prior to his injury woes this past season. It’s not inconceivable that there was a team willing to look past the medical concerns and offer him that sort of deal this winter, given King’s comments. The Marlins, Cubs, Orioles, Yankees, and Red Sox were among the teams known to have interest in King’s services this winter, though Jon Heyman of the New York Post reports that the Yankees ultimately never made an offer to the righty.
With King in the fold alongside Nick Pivetta and Joe Musgrove, Preller indicated that he’s satisfied with the front of the club’s rotation. It seems the Padres had a strong desire to add to the front of their rotation this winter, however, as Dennis Lin of The Athletic reports that San Diego made a “competitive” offer to right-hander Merrill Kelly before landing King. Kelly ultimately landed with the Diamondbacks on a two-year, $40MM deal. The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal recently reported that Kelly received a three-year offer from a west coast team that would’ve guaranteed the right-hander “more than $50MM,” and it’s not clear if the Padres were the team references in Rosenthal’s report, it certainly wouldn’t be a shock if the “competitive” offer Lin reports that San Diego made to Kelly was in that ballpark. A three-year offer in that range could theoretically have been similar to the four-year, $55MM contract the team signed Pivetta to last winter.
Perhaps Preller’s desire to add a front-of-the-rotation arm this winter in part stems from uncertainty surrounding Yu Darvish’s future. The veteran right-hander underwent UCL surgery last month that will keep him out of commission for at least the entire 2026 campaign. What’s more, Kevin Acee of the San Diego Union-Tribune reported earlier this week that Darvish is not certain if he’ll pitch again following his rehab process. The 39-year-old hurler was limited to 15 starts this past year due to injury and struggled when he did take the mound, with a 5.38 ERA in 72 innings of work. Given that he’ll celebrate his 41st birthday during the 2027 season, it’s perhaps not a shock that Darvish is uncertain about his ability to return to a major league mound after this latest health-related setback.
Of course, the possibility of Darvish stepping away from baseball is complicated by his contract situation. The veteran righty is under contract for $16MM in 2026 and is set to make $15MM per year in both 2027 and 2028. If Darvish were to retire, as Acee has reported he’s contemplating, He would stand to lose out on at least some of that money. It’s also possible that Darvish and the Padres could negotiate a buyout, not unlike the process the Angels and Anthony Rendon are reportedly in the midst of ahead of the final year of his contract with the organization. Perhaps that sort of buyout could help create financial flexibility for the budget-conscious Padres, who have had to get creative with their contracts in recent years in order to remain competitive and continue spending in free agency.

I’m waiting for the MLBTR heading “Red Sox move on former Dodger” again. They apparently signed Alec Gamboa! Who? Yes, Alec Gamboa! Ownership is spending the Devers’ money wisely…
This “budget-conscious Padres” is such a tired take.
I think this site knows this and likes the responses the ‘cut and paste’ posts gets.
“look how much ‘engagement’ we get when we do this. Advertisers love it!”
Every team in the NL West is “budget conscious” in comparison to what the Dodgers spend.
I think the Angels have put the Rendon buyout on hold. Perry mentioned last week that Rendon has been working out. IMHO I think the Angels are going to wait and see if Rendon can play in 2026. before proceeding with buy out talks.
a ‘buyout’ with one year left on his deal. he probably wont negotiate at all, so odds are it will result in a dfa if anything at this point
I would think the Angels and Rendon could get this done. Get some deferrals to reduce the luxury tax and Rendon can just do whatever he wants.
I hope if Rendon is fighting deferrals that the Angels GM does everything he can to make Rendon attend every team even he can but I probably dont know enough about what is going on or what the GM can actually do in this case.
@Salary- I’m not so sure the MLBPA will allow the Angels to buyout Rendon’s contract. We haven’t heard anything from them since the news broke about the Angels and Rendon renegotiating either.
If both parties agree to terms, why would the MLBPA have an issue, particularly if the money is the same? Really not being argumentative. If you can think of something, tell me about it.
Angels are currently expected to be ~60mil under the CBT. I doubt they are interested in deferrals in order to reduce the luxury tax for 2026.
@WCI’m sure it was the Angels idea to do this.
Pete Alonso’s wife is from Massachusetts. Michael King is from Rhode Island and went to school in Boston. John Henry and Breslow probably knew none of this.
Why do fans assume players want to play for a team in the area they or a family member is from? Did it ever occur they din’t like the area they grew up in?
I suspect that the vast majority of persons in this country would prefer the climate of the San Diego area over the climate of the New England area. And that vast majority would include persons who were born and raised in New England.
@dolemiteismyname
The article stressed that King wanted to go back to the northeast. Alonso also stayed in the general region.
In most cases players want to stay close to where they are from as their extended families, and often their immediate families (wife & kids), live in the area; and we see this happen time and again. However it’s rare that they sacrifice significant income in order to do this. The Yankees and Red Sox weren’t that interested in King as they have other needs/wants and it seems he would rather wait a year with the Pades than play with the Orioles.
No New England discounts. Remember, Henry puts our money where he believes the return will be greater.
Wanted to win , yet stays with team destined to be the Dodgers side chick for the foreseeable future
Dodgers won 93 games and Padres won 90.
If Michael King had been healthy in the 2nd half, then it is conceiveable
that the Padres could have passed the Dodgers, won 95+ games last year and represented the NL in the World Series last year.
Also they lost barely to cubs in wild card where they threw all lefties against padres who’s best lefty hitter Loreano broke his hand right before playoffs. I can’t imagine they don’t add a hitter that mashes specifically lefties.
“If.” The favorite phrase of the has been and never was.
If Dodgers’ staff was healthy, they’d have won 100+ games in 25…
That is the problem with the Padres, an excellent team. They have a great core with Tatis, Merrill, Machado, Cronenwerth and even a bloated Bogaerts (the contract not his girth). It they have very little depth to fill in to injuries or slumps by position players or pitchers. King and Musgrove are returning from injuries and Darvish may or may not return at all. Barring additional acquisitions, right now I see the Padres as the third wild card team after the Cubs (first WC unless Brewers trade Freddy) and Atlanta (second WC) and maybe just a game or two ahead of the Reds and Giants. Another quality starting pitcher could easily boost Cubs or Padres.
Cubs aren’t even going to make the playoffs. Some career years + kyle Tucker last year. Regression and no Tucker coming in 2026.
I expect a little regression from Busch but they protect him with a partial strong side platoon so it won’t be that much. Cubs did fine even with Tucker and PCA slumping in second half. Steele will be back by June and Horton may regress but they a full year of him. Shaw had a good second half and Suzuki may bounce back in 2026. I feel confident that Cubs will make playoffs unless they do not have multiple severe injuries to major stars. They maybe need one solid starter and one solid reliever to complete the offseason.
To represent the NL in the World Series, you need a team capable of making it to the division series. “if they won 9 more games they could have won the pennant!!!!”
Post about the Padres. Doger fan: how can I make this about me?
@James so true. Toronto and Seattle fans are getting annoying too. NY (That includes the Mets) and Boston fans have always been annoying. Let’s see, Did I leave anyone out?
Dole, not all fans of a group are annoying and please use a narrower brush when you try to paint us. I’m upset with Sox ownership because of the lies. They had success but instead of continuing to put back the money we fans spend on the team, they use their Sox profits elsewhere because Henry envisions higher returns.
@Dewey,First off I only mentioned 5 teams of 30. 2nd of course it’s not ALL fans of those 5 teams. Don’t take it personally.okay?But the fans NOT ALL of those 5 teams are insufferable. Not to mention ESPN and their bias toward teams on the East Coast.
I don’t mind him making it about the Dodgers and NL West teams are inter-linked. But his side chick comment smacks of misogyny.
Even with Dodgers getting Diaz, Padres have the best bullpen in the NL West, if not MLB. Just not the starting pitching.
The Padres are worthy adversaries to the Dodgers and certainly more of a threat to take the NL West title than the Giants or Diamondbacks. As a Dodgers fan I feared them in the march to the pennant more than the Phillies or Mets. That still holds true for 2026.
fh
You don’t have to win the division to win the WS
It helps, though
On the other hand, you can apply the same reasoning to the Dodgers. If they hadn’t had their slew of injuries, they might have won the division by 10 or 12 games or more.
The “what ifs”
Padre fans are the biggest crybabies on this website. Recently they were crying about the dodgers spending even though their luxury tax payment was 2x LA’s as recently as the 2023 season. They constantly complain about sportswriters mentioning how they’ve spent less since seidler passed away too. Acting like Pivetta and King are big contracts when they previously gave a few players 9 digit contracts is just strange to me. No need to be so sensitive
Why do the Dodgers need to defer billions of dollars and avoid paying taxes on 500-600 million payroll instead paying taxes on half that at 300 mill?
Hey how much deferred money did padres have in 2023? 0? Oh so they can actually pay their tax bill and don’t need to dodge tax bills like the LA Tax Dodging Deferrals do. Got it.
They can spend 7-8 billion dollars since 2000 but suddenly need financial help on their tax bills lmao. Poverty franchise
@ Huh Umm because the Dodgers owners know how to work the system and use it to there advantage Maybe they want to use some of that money (Which they have) and use it to renovate Dodger Stadium. among other things. They’re just using the “tools” that are available to them.
I set up a go fund me to help cover the dodgers 2026 tax bill. Wanna donate?
@Huh, Curious, Who is your favorite MLB team and why does it bother you so much that Dodgers do this? Like I said before They are using the tools available.. THE MLBPA is okay with it.Any team can do this.
Undermining the cbt shouldn’t be allowed
What’s the point of having the cbt if teams can use deferrals to lower tax bills set by the competitive balance tax
If dodgers were taxed at 100% payroll I wouldn’t care how much they spent long as their tax bill reflected how much they’re spending
But to agree to a 10 year 700 mill contract with Ohtani and have 8 out of 17 most deferrals on contracts it’s pointless to have the cbt if one team can completely undermine it with ease.
Again idc about deferrals or their payroll I care about undermining the cbt which is suppose to be in place so teams with more money can’t monopolize the game. Obviously that system has failed and will inevitably lead to a lock out soon.
Thanks Dodgers
The Dodgers had plenty of advantages, huge city, huge TV contract, great weather and a giant payroll. So foolish to focus on deferrals like complaining that a billionaire still got a home mortgage. I am fine with limiting deferrals not because they are unfair but only to avoid hearing no sense from those who cannot grasp simple tenets of economics and finance.
If you don’t see an issue with using deferrals to lower your tax bill from 500-600 mill to 300 mill which undermines the cbt, competitive balance tax in case you were unaware what it stood for, that’s a you issue and there isn’t enough crayons or paper in the world that’ll help you.
See if DJT or EM tax dodge you all throw hissy fits
Same with JRB and whatever R or D politician you hate
They all do it
But rich Dodger owner wants to pay less in taxes and suddenly it’s ok rich guy doesn’t pay as much in taxes lmao. Can’t make this up.
“I don’t see a problem using deferrals to help us pay less in taxes according to the competitive balance tax system. We don’t need a hard card the systems fine where we can lower our tax bill using deferrals and avoid paying 100% taxes on payroll only 60% of our payroll in taxes”- dodger fans and people who think they’re educated
Yu stated when he signed this contract that he wasn’t sure if he would play it out. Without the injury, he likley pitches in 2026 and then decides about 27/28 based on how that goes. With this injury, he just may shock everyone with walking away from the money – or part of it in a buyout / transition to a consulting role in front office / in charge of foreign scouting.
He stated recently he is talking to Preller about his future.
Also was in the room with Preller while negotiating with Kings agent.
Darvish lives in San Diego full time. His son just signed with a college in San Diego to pitch.
He is fully commit to San Diego. May take a job in the front office/coaching role for a year. Then decide what he wants to do next season.
So when’s the retraction portion of padres looking to shed finances gonna come?
Apparently mlbtr can pat themselves on the back being “close” to King’s contract
“ While King’s $75MM guarantee came in just shy of the $80MM guarantee MLBTR predicted for the right-hander at the outset of the offseason”
Though you were all wrong guessing 4 years, Orioles, Tigers, Yankees
But can’t be bothered to admit them constantly posting about padres looking to shed salary from Tatis Jr to Pivetta to Cronenworth was a false rumor they spread like wild fire since Schildt stepped down and the Padres ownership sent out the letter to fans, despite the current ownership promising to keep spending levels near the same.
Long article to basically state King went for money, because Padres have little chance to reach WS with deferment dodgers in same division.
~~blown [him] away” with strong offers, he didn’t believe those teams had the roster and commitment to winning necessary to field a World Series contender in 2026. King added that he was prioritizing winning “for the duration of the contract,” and that he was willing to take less in order to make that happen.~~
This feels incongruous to reality. He stays with the team that is prioritizing winning over better offers? Not sure Padres are doing that any better to take a discount. Which makes me think he didn’t get the offers he wanted out East and is just playing to the Padres base.
Clev – you sound like a guy who doesn’t want to believe anything that doesn’t fit his own narrative even when a guy has no reason to bother to make an after the fact statement.
If it was a ln agent stating something in advance def worth questioning but here, King has nothing to gain.
Padres have a window in ’26 – good team on paper – Nice deal on the Korean but passing on a reunion with Arraez is a risk.
The Padres started clicking with Arraez in ’24. He had an off year in ’25 and hit .292. Only 21 K’s in 675 PAs – he could of easily went .315/.350/.400 this season. He is such a tough out and really puts a wrinkle in the lineup that keeps pitchers thinking.
I would have passed on King for Arreaz and went soft in the rotation. Replace Maranacio with Pierce Johnson or Michael Kopech. Rely on the bullpen again. Worked last season.
Up 14M on Machado next season. 28M to King next season, he is picking that up.
Moranacio had sub 1 era in mlb. Although, He wasn’t given many innings at mlb level I really like what I saw. Ignore his El paso numbers that aaa league for pitching is BS.
For all the nonsense reporting about the padres and their finances I think if they do save money it’s the bullpen because Preller knows how to build a bullpen better than any other area. He doesn’t need to spend a lot. They have shown they can pickup guys on minor league contracts and turn them into studs or develop them from farm.