Padres manager Craig Stammen says that the club is planning to keep Mason Miller, Adrián Morejón and David Morgan in the bullpen, per Alden González of ESPN. “It’s a risky proposition health-wise and performance-wise,” Stammen said, of the proposing of stretching them out.
Turning relievers into starters has been all the rage around baseball in recent years. The appeal is often financial, as starters generally cost more in terms of dollars spent on free agents or prospects traded for controllable pitchers. Some of the more successful conversions have been in San Diego, as both Seth Lugo and Michael King fully established themselves as starters with the Padres.
Going into 2025, there was some sense for the Padres to consider trying again with the aforementioned names. Their rotation depth has been a problem for a few years now. They then traded Ryan Bergert and Stephen Kolek at the deadline to get catcher Freddy Fermin. They lost both King and Dylan Cease to free agency at season’s end. Yu Darvish is going to miss 2026 while recovering from UCL surgery.
That leaves them with Nick Pivetta and a bunch of question marks. Joe Musgrove should be back next year but he just missed the 2025 campaign due to his own elbow surgery. Guys like Randy Vásquez, JP Sears, Kyle Hart and Matt Waldron are in the mix but they all had middling results in 2025. Vásquez was the only one with an earned run average below 5.00 but his 13.7% strikeout rate doesn’t provide a lot of confidence in him repeating that kind of run prevention.
The San Diego bullpen, on the other hand, was one of the best in 2025. Padres relievers had a collective 3.06 ERA this year, the best mark in the majors. They have lost Robert Suarez to free agency but it’s still a talented group.
Moving a reliever or two into a starting role could have perhaps helped the Padres bolster their rotation without costing any money, a key element for a club which has clearly been operating under financial constraints in recent years. This would hurt the bullpen but would arguably be a worthwhile trade-off.
President of baseball operations commented on the possibility of this plan back in October and November, with Miller, Morejón and Morgan mentioned as possible candidates. Preller didn’t completely close the door on the possibility but raised the concern of ending up in a situation where neither the rotation nor the bullpen are strengths.
The possibility was most enticing with Miller. He was a starter as a prospect and began his major league career out of the rotation with the Athletics. But some injuries, including a UCL sprain in 2023, led the A’s to put him in the bullpen. He became one of the best closers in baseball, throwing triple-digit heat and striking out over 40% of batters faced. Had he moved into a starting role, he likely would have needed to take his foot off the gas a bit, but the idea of him dominating as a starter was an exciting one.
That path would also carry some risk. The Padres gave up a big package of prospects, headlined by Leo De Vries, in order to get Miller and Sears from the A’s. They were willing to pay that price in large part because Miller was cheaply controlled for four-plus seasons. A notable injury, such as a surgery with a recovery timeline of over year, would take a huge bite out of that control window. It seems the Friars have decided to not take the risk and will keep Miller in a role where he has seemed comfortable.
Morejón isn’t the household name that Miller is, but he was once a notable starting pitching prospect himself. Frequent injuries limited him early in his big league career, which pushed him to the bullpen. The past two seasons have been great, as he has stayed healthy enough to log at least 63 frames with an ERA under 3.00 in both campaigns. Morgan has been primarily a reliever throughout his professional career but just had a strong major league debut while featuring a five-pitch mix and minimal platoon split.
Despite the attraction of filling a rotation vacancy from within, it seems the Padres will keep all three of these guys in the bullpen. That means the club should have a really strong relief corps again in 2026 but their rotation remains a massive question as of today. Answering that question is going to be a challenge with their ongoing payroll problems. The financial picture is such a challenge that they are reportedly considering trade offers on Pivetta, which would only further thin the rotation.
Photo courtesy of Chadd Cady, Imagn Images

And he wins the NL Cy Young…
No chance.
It’s the right call. Same with Morejon.
though it probably was the preference of the players who would have the final say about converting to SP.
I agree with the decision, whether it was influenced more by the players or the front office’s command decision. However, I can see why good relivers with the right pitch mix might want to get into (or back into) starting.
The really huge $$$ are paid to starters. Suarez is rumored to be likely to get $80M from the Dodgers or some other top team, and that’s life changing as well. However, with $200M+, a young man can just about buy his own country. 😏 So, it’s a bit difficult to believe that all of them declined starting opportunities.
On the other hand, each of the relievers mentioned have different stories. I am happy most of all that Morejon wasn’t tempted to force his way back to starting, as he’s just started being healthy enough to realize his MLB career dreams. Miller has his own history of injuries. Not sure about Morgan.
Agree
And the right call for the two fantasy teams where I’ve already spent a high draft pick on Miller, lol.
That photo of him..worst uniform EVER!
I’m good with it.
Given what they gave up for him and his injury history, there really was no decision to make.
The only way to justify the price they paid was if they thought they could unlock another level in Miller’s value by converting him to a starter
Padres have a nice bullpen with Miller, Morejon, Adam and Estrada.
Padres should trade a relief pitcher to Dodgers for a young starter – I just can’t see that type of deal between division rivals but it would make both teams stronger.
Say Adam for Stone?
Maybe we could get River Ryan back. Oof.
This Dodger fan says hard pass
One year of Adam for 4 of Stone?
I’m not sure that Stone isn’t the better player.
BRV agrees. It has Adam in the negative and Stone at $3 million.
I’d rather just sign Suarez and keep Stone
I agree with you. Did not realize Adam only had one year left. It would have to be different pitchers for it to work. The point is that Dodgers have extra starting depth and Padres have outstanding relievers, but that the rivalry makes a deal unlikely despite the complementary needs and surpluses.
Adam trade value difficult to tell with an unknown injury status.
Basically he should be “more valuable” than any team should be willing to trade.
He’ll stay a Padre under any reasonable circumstances.
The Padres could make that deal with many other ballclubs.
They will not strengthen their bigges Division rival by trading with them.
I think this is one of the most overblown things
If a team thinks Stone is the best return for Adam they’ll get, that’s the move they should make.
Adam had a serious surgery last (late) summer. Recovery time was estimated at between 6 and 9 months. He may be ready by March.. But maybe not until June.
That’s interesting. It would indicate that the writers saying they won’t be adding free agent starting pitchers and are looking to trade Pivetta are wrong about what they will be doing again this year.
Yeah, they it’s a clear need and if they aren’t risking relievers being starters. They must feel like they can add a starter or two a different way.
fling rumor pasta against the wall, no matter how outrageous, maybe one sticks, seems to be the new credo for reporting.
I haven’t heard any evidence or even hints that the Padres have major payroll issues and are entering a rebuilding phase, so it would surprise me if they traded away their best SP when that’s the biggest position of weakness going into the season.
Did you miss the reporting of $150m in cash calls over the last few years? 50% of the also reported 300m maxed out debt.
Yeah mate. It’s all good. Payroll levels are fine.
Payroll has increased 2 years in a row after the reset on CBT and remains in top tier of MLB. Just facts please
I did state facts.
2 years in a row ? Are you sure ? Didn’t it drop from 250 in 2023 to 180 in 2024. Then went up last year on the back of a big arbitration class. As distinct from free agent spending. Remember. You went in with no left fielder last year because of payroll constraints. Heavily backloaded Pivetta because of payroll constraints.
How did I do with those new facts you introduced ?
What’s with the 150m in cash calls over the last few years ? Would requiring that cash be because they are spending more than they are making ?
2 years in a row yup. Greupner on record saying this years they plan to have about the same payroll as last. As far as what money they are making, they are a revenue sharing team and that’s all we know about revenue, but it’s enough to negate your bankruptcy hypothesis.
As early as ….today, Seidler said payroll would not be less than last year.
lol at including this year ! It hasn’t happened yet. Seeing into the future ? That is so you. Just manipulating info for the sake of your opinion. Hilarious. You go girl !
Ha ha. The report said “similar”. Did your ego read it as “would not be less” ?
Oh wow you might need a nap, lil guy
lol. I don’t need a nap. I thought we were dealing with facts ! Remember. It was just a post or two ago. “Facts please”. You did request that didn’t you ?
If they pass on adding starting pitching and trade Pivetta, they might as well just take a knee on opening day.
Padres clearly feel they will be able to add to the roster ion since they are ditching moving any of their best relievers to starters.
That doesn’t mean they won’t trade any relievers since they keep signing them this offseason.
Reliever market is about as high as I can remember being. So some team may come calling to get a dude for their pen that doesn’t cost 14+m these dudes are getting.
I could see them taking a flyer on a rule 5 guy
the smart move for all three
Well then giving up the #3 prospect for a reliever still seems crazy no matter how good miller is
People keep hyping Leo De Vries up like they knew his career this whole time…
They traded Leo for something that wasn’t even an issue with their team. Rotation has one quality major league starter. Lineup is too top heavy. Absurd use of the #1 prospect.
You change your username more than Roger from American Dad changes costumes. Guess this week “its a gapper!” Mason Miller is a monster and the best relief pitcher in baseball. But he is not going to do them much good with a AAA rotation and a terrible top heavy lineup that is easy to pitch around in October. The Padres could have easily replaced Suarez without trading someone like De Vries. Good relief pitching is not hard to find. Louis Varland is slightly worse than Miller but at a fraction of the cost. They are supposed to make the playoffs with Nick Pavetta and a bunch of #5 starters? Good luck with that
Varland did not have a good regular season after the trade but was fantastic in the playoffs. His World Series numbers took a hit because of overuse and the Dodgers had seen him like 8 times since July. Preller’s own moves showed he could get relief pitchers without trading the #1 prospect like Adam and Scott the year before. You trying to toss Cease in with those guys is just comical and the Padres paint you are huffing in every reply. Cease got overpaid but he’s way better than the typical innings eaters you can get cheap. Coinvent how you pretend to forgot Michael King exists and is out the door. A rotation of Pivetta and whatever version of Musgrove comes back and a bunch of AAAA players is supposed to win them anything? Good luck with that.
Varland pitched in every Blue Jays postseason game but one at a high level and they made it to game 7 of the World Series lmao. I thought the Padres were making deals to play games that matter not the regular season. Padres fans wouldn’t know about it because their postseason experience was 3 games where their awful lineup performed predictably, got two decent starts and had to pitch whatever was left of Darvish in game 3 where his career likely ended. Almost like that was the entire point. Mason Miller was fantastic but he does them no good if the offense puts up 3 runs on a good day. If they traded Leo for Crochet last year they might have actually had a chance to win the best of 3, and going forward. Instead you are lying to yourself pretending a 3-5 of Randy Vazquez, JP Sears and lord knows what can actually win something
Sorry you’re wrong, but the A’s are gonna win this one.
The Dodgers have more home grown players on their roster than the Padres do. The Padres tried to buy the 2023 world series and failed miserably so sounds like a skill issue. Cease and King are their two best starters over the course of these past two Padres seasons. Keep thinking they will easily be replaced. You love to change your name every week and swear I was wrong but did you remember this one Jimmy? I said last April when Maldonado and Gurriel made the Padres opening day roster they didn’t have the lineup depth to win anything. Behold their offense scored 5 runs in 3 playoff games and the only offense came from Manny and Merrill. What will you username be next week?
Padres did their own legal form of manipulation by signing players to 11 year deals and Darvish until he was age 42 to reduce CBT hit. Nothing wrong with it though, thats just runner up talk to complain about it for Padres fans. This homegrown talk you always bring up jogged my memory of another song and dance we did Mr. username of the week. You told me guys like Sheehan and Wrobleski were average homegrown talents that every team has. I told you WAR did not do them justice and they both have big upside. Behold Sheehan and Wrobo were both massive pieces of the Dodger run including dominate games 6-7 in Toronto where they were both hitting high 90s with movement. Keep going and maybe you’ll jog more times I was right,
You get on this soap box every time but it always ends with deferrals deferrals deferrals sad! Just shows how perpetually jealous little brother is.. Are deferrals illegal? They are agreed upon in the CBA. So MLB and the MLBPA consent, but you dont good to know. Wrobleski was on the wild card roster and only off in the division series because he had a really bad blow up against Philly two weeks before. He is a blossoming Josh Hader glad to have him. You can keep box score watching his WAR. We will take the rings. That is 9 of them now to the Padres 0 for history. Sheehan would be your 2 starter right now. Be careful who you call ugly.
They didnt use him in the NLCS because they won that series in two minutes and the starters went demon mode. Sheehan had some bad moments but his regular season numbers were good and he was good at the time he absolutely had to be. You might want to compare his baseball savant page to Randy Vazquez. This is such a ridiculous tangent anyway that you always do Pads Fans. At the end of the day you cant tell us with a straight face a Pivetta and friends rotation is winning anything and you went silent mode on the Padres anemic offense. Almost like the entire point was Padres had more pressing holes than a relief pitcher and their need to replace Suarez is way smaller than to have a functional offense or major league rotation. You can deflect to the Dodgers farm system all you want AJ Preller’s burner. Doesnt change the fact their lineup still stinks and Leo could have got them Crochet or another middle of the order bat.
Like 10 replies and still not a peep about the anemic SD offense
All good you’ll see next year when Randy Vazquez and his mediocre stuff is pitching to a high 4s ERA and Sheehan is shoving. You’ll be on your 12th username since this thread by then.
Padres postseason: out in 3 games, good relief pitching, decent but not great starts, anemic offense. Dodgers back to back. I’m always right
Miller is great and all, but the A’s will likely look like the winners of that trade by late 2026 or 2027 at the latest.
Its a gapper is you Pads Fan !! Ha ha. I thought so. Nice attempt. I had my doubts for a
post or two….. then the all too familiar style kicked in. Ha ha.
Find Pads Fan is a cracking game to play as a reader !
Yeah. Na. Don’t believe you.
There is nobody out there doing the “I’m always right and you are always wrong” like Pads Fan does. Dead give away. Dude. Your narcissistic style is too obvious.
Ha ha. Ok.
Smart moves by the Padres.
Too Risky moving Miller to rotation.
And, he is not a FA until 2030.
If needs arise, then could flip Miller in ’28 or ’29 and get a very nice package of young cost costrolled major league and major league ready talent for Miller in the future.
Preller and the Padres will find the guys to fill out their rotation and excel.
Smart move. Padres wanted to ruin my boy’s career by making him a starter.
Trading De Vries for a RP when the bullpen was already a strength was stupid then and looks even worse now. Their rotation is a mess and De Vries could have been used to get a frontline SP. Preller is going to drive that team into the ground
The bullpen took a hit when Adam went down for the season. Miller replaced him in 2025 and replaces Suarez moving forward.
Leo De Vries is probably the next Franklin Barreto.
Coping for the A’s constantly trading (giving up)
I often agree with you, but come on. Top-3 overall prospects rarely let you down. I love Miller, but they gave up too much to get him.
Cmon. He’s 18. Let it play out then we can assess who “won” the trade
“Preller is going to drive that team into the ground”
Consistently wrong about Preller since 2015 …
… is everyone who as said this.
Well, after reading that, I don’t know how the Pads can expect to fill out a rotation enough to be competitive next year
Via trades or FA signings like they’ve always done. If we look what they’ve lost from last year, Cease gave them innings but wasn’t very good, and King and Darvish were hurt most of the year. Yet they still won 90 games. I wouldn’t count them out just yet.
In the wake of the article about them listening on Pivetta… they literally don’t have a rotation right now
I get there are rumors. Preller is listening on everyone, like most GMs who wish to improve their teams. But it would seem they have two directions they can go, rebuild a 90 win team with numerous long-term committed contracts (Machado, Bogaerts, etc…), which has been a narrative off season about the Padres for years now, OR fill in the pieces (SP and 1b/dh needs). I’m guessing they will do the later and remain consistent with what has been their publicly spoken vision for the team. To compete for playoffs (on paper) they need 2 SPs, one should be in the #3 or better quality, the other a 4/5. Despite rumors of payroll doom, they have some $ to work with this year, more than last year at this time, and perhaps fewer roster voids to fill.
That article also said it’s unlikely to happen
Yeah, but, it’s Preller. The only things predictable about him are that he burns through managers and is unpredictable.
Even retaining Pivetta, that’s one guy. Just one guy on a depth chart that is otherwise full of guys lucky to be labeled “average.”
Musgrove is returning, you may not have realized. Vásquez is now proven #5 IMO. But let’s see where they are in April rather than nailing the coffin shut now
Pivetta and Musgrove are solid as the top two options. Vasquez’s peripheral stats look terrible but he pitches to soft contact and gets results (3.84 ERA last year) so he is fine as a #4/5 SP.
Preller will find a way to get a #3 and #5 SP to fill out the rotation. 16 of the current 36 players on the Padres roster are relievers and they have a very deep bullpen right now, especially with this news that they aren’t converting anyone to SP. My guess would be that they trade from the bullpen to shed salary that can then be spent on starters.
Musgrove hasn’t pitched since 2024, assuming he’ll be back to what he was is hardly a safe bet.
Vazquez’s k rate is too low, he’s gotten by on luck.
But … but … but Brew,
The Padres keep promising to spend in the highest MLB tiers, and constantly sell off and rebuild their team on the cheap. The Pads are ALWAYS lying to their fans about spending, which just validates all the talk about “disastrous payroll issues” floated every, single year for the past five years …
*** not ***
You would think that folks would remember “recent history”, at least 2024 and 2025, when Preller managed to fill every “catastrophic hole” in the roster. But nope, this year will be different Major sell-off, for sure! 🙄🙈😖
Unfortunately false narratives live longer lives than reality itself O’Salt. But the transfer of ownership, when it ever happens, will sure be interesting and does add quite a bit of uncertainty. Payroll could go up!
Good. Why mess with one of the best closers. Definitely will be high on the Fantasy draft boards in the spring.
Lol give up 3rd best prospect in baseball for a reliever. Padres gonna padre.
Lol Leo De Vries hype to justify the A’s throwing in the towel
The A’s in general are a trash organization. But if you remove the team names and just use market size cap size descriptors it sounds like this.
Big market team gives up top 3 prospect for top reliever from low payroll team.
Removing team names that’s what this trade is essentially. It’s a great deal for the low payroll team.
It’s a great deal for the A’s.
Wise move
Headline-“Padres to keep Mason Miller in Bullpen”
Is he allowed to go home on weekends least ? I, mean seriously why can’t he go home during the off season?
Har har.