Headlines

  • Bill Mazeroski Passes Away
  • Pablo López To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Jordan Westburg Diagnosed With Partial UCL Tear
  • Brewers, Pat Murphy Agree To New Contract
  • Bruce Meyer Elected MLBPA Executive Director
  • Spencer Schwellenbach, Hurston Waldrep To Undergo Elbow Surgery
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Blue Jays Continuing To Pursue Kyle Tucker

By Anthony Franco | January 6, 2026 at 7:37pm CDT

The Blue Jays had already been one of the sport’s most aggressive teams before signing NPB star Kazuma Okamoto to a four-year, $60MM contract over the weekend. Okamoto joins Dylan Cease, Cody Ponce and Tyler Rogers as significant free agent acquisitions. They’ve also been one of the clubs most frequently tied to the top two free agent hitters, Kyle Tucker and Bo Bichette.

There has been plenty of speculation that the Jays could be Tucker’s eventual landing spot. Mark Feinsand of MLB.com wrote yesterday that two of his sources pegged Toronto as the favorite for the market’s top player. Meanwhile, Mitch Bannon of The Athletic reports this evening that the Jays are making a stronger push for Tucker than they had earlier in the winter. Ben Nicholson-Smith of Sportsnet adds that the sides have had recent conversations, though he suggests the door remains open to Tucker or Bichette. Toronto’s interest in Tucker stretches back to the beginning of the offseason; he visited the club’s Spring Training facility in Dunedin on December 3.

RosterResource calculates the Jays’ payroll around $280MM, which is already $40MM above where they opened the 2025 season. Their luxury tax estimate sits at $308MM, more than $20MM north of last year’s season-ending tax number. They’re above the $304MM mark that represents the top tier of penalization. That already has them on track to pay around $30MM in luxury taxes, more than all but four teams (the Dodgers, Mets, Yankees and Phillies) paid last season. Any future spending is taxed at a 90% clip on the average annual value. A hypothetical $35MM AAV for Tucker would come with a $31.5MM tax on top of it.

[Related Poll: Will Jays Add Another Bat?]

It’s unclear how much of a deterrent the tax obligations are for the Jays. They’re already into uncharted financial waters after coming a few inches away from their first World Series in three decades. The Rogers ownership group and the front office are clearly committed to a win-now posture. George Springer, Shane Bieber, Kevin Gausman and Daulton Varsho will all be free agents next offseason. That’s a lot of money coming off the books but also four key contributors whom they’re not guaranteed to have back in 2027, which should only increase the motivation to make another run this year.

Tucker, a career .273/.358/.507 hitter, is the best offensive player available. He’d step into an everyday right field role, pushing Anthony Santander to left. The Jays would have Springer as their primary designated hitter. Okamoto and Addison Barger could play either third base or factor into the corner outfield. It wouldn’t leave much playing time for Nathan Lukes, who’d be a speculative trade candidate. Lukes is coming off a solid season (.255/.323/.407 with 12 homers) but isn’t the kind of player who’ll prevent teams from making a run at a star.

General manager Ross Atkins spoke in generalities this morning about the team’s diligence in looking for continued ways to improve (link via Ben Nicholson-Smith of Sportsnet). Atkins noted that any “additions at this point start to cut away playing time from players that we feel are very good major league pieces.” While it’s not a given that they’ll make any moves, that’d seemingly point toward them only strongly pursuing impact talent rather than targeting marginal upgrades over role players.

If the Jays were to land Tucker, that’d almost certainly close the door on a reunion with Bichette. One team signing the top three free agents in an offseason is essentially without precedent, and adding both players would push Toronto’s luxury tax number well above $350MM. Bannon indeed suggests that while the Jays aren’t out of the running for Bichette, a new deal with their longtime shortstop looks less likely after the Okamoto signing.

Playing Okamoto and/or Barger regularly at third base pushes Ernie Clement to second, where Bichette would probably be penciled in if he heads back to Rogers Centre. The bigger deterrent may simply be a reluctance on the team’s part to make a long-term commitment to Bichette. Bannon writes that a reunion could be more likely if the infielder settles for a shorter deal that allows him to opt out after the first season.

Share Repost Send via email

Newsstand Toronto Blue Jays Bo Bichette Kyle Tucker

Angels Sign Kirby Yates
Main
Tigers, Dugan Darnell Agree To Minor League Deal
View Comments (233)
Post a Comment

233 Comments

  1. Mercenary.Freddie.Freeman

    2 months ago

    Just resign Bo and be done with it already.

    11
    Reply
    • padrepapi

      2 months ago

      I like the Tucker fit better. A big lefty bat to pair with Vlad. Think he’ll have a better next 7 years than Bo performance and health wise. I expect he’ll cost more in AAV, but think it’ll probably be worthwhile.

      22
      Reply
      • Diggydugler

        2 months ago

        Tucker is the better fit, especially since they overpaid Gimmy and obviously want his defense at SS. However, I suspect Tucker will demand a lot more money and if it was my money (lets say $200M vs $400M total deal) I would take Bo. But its not my money and Atkins doesnt want Bo 🙁

        8
        Reply
        • Oppo nacho

          2 months ago

          Gimenez was already extended I believe

          6
          Reply
        • NoSaint

          2 months ago

          @Oppo nacho

          Correct. That’s Cleveland’s contract.

          6
          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          Gimenez is why Bo’s the better fit.

          2
          Reply
        • Anthony maresca

          2 months ago

          Tucker is NOT getting $400 million from any team period! Even a 9 yr deal at $35 million avv is $315 million. He won’t come close!

          8
          Reply
        • Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

          2 months ago

          And 35mil aav is twice as much as he got for 2025. I don’t even put blame on him for the injury. I put the blame on the FO. They f’d up and dropped the ball when they didn’t put him on the IL right away when he had a tight hamstring.

          I don’t think he’ll get even 35mil a year. He’ll be 29 in a few weeks. I wouldn’t go more than 8 years and 270-285mil

          Even that gets him 35mil aav

          2
          Reply
        • greg1

          2 months ago

          Actually it’s the opposite. Gimmy is a SS by trade, and a gold glover at that. Just flipping him and Bo at SS and 2B would make the Jays better. If Bo’s not willing to move to SS then Gimmy and Clement with Tucker in the outfield is a much better option for the Jays.

          Obviously the Jays have too much money into Santandar, which is exasperated even more with a Tucker signing, but Tucker replacing AS is much more impactful than Gimmy and Clement replacing Bo.

          2
          Reply
        • pingston

          2 months ago

          Exacerbated, maybe.

          2
          Reply
        • scissormetimbers

          2 months ago

          Is santanders contract even that bad? Everything is deferred and it had a NPV at the time of signing of $62.5M over 5 years or $12.5M per season with only 4 to go.

          1
          Reply
        • greg1

          2 months ago

          Yeah, it’s not a complete train wreck like Rendon’s was, but it’s still pretty ugly for a guy who hit .175 and was on a 17 home run pace over 162 games. I know injuries affected him even when he was in the lineup, but production like that gets a player a Minor League Contract with an invite to Spring Training usually.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          Gimenez is a gold glover at 2B. Not short.

          3
          Reply
        • greg1

          2 months ago

          Played both when winning Gold Gloves in Cleveland.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          Won the gold glove at second base, not shortstop. He is not a gold glove shortstop. Thats like saying Ryne Sandberg was a gold glove shortstop. Over Ozzie. Never happened. He might’ve played some shortstop, however that gold glove was for second base.

          2
          Reply
        • FrozenRopes

          2 months ago

          He was really good at SS this past year and could be a GG there.

          1
          Reply
        • NoSaint

          2 months ago

          @FrozenRopes

          He had 119 innings at SS in ’25. That’s not enough to draw any conclusions.

          1
          Reply
        • FrozenRopes

          2 months ago

          Well, the guys getting paid millions by the owners of the 2+ billion dollar team to make those decisions seem to think so. I will trust them over a rando on the internet forum.

          Reply
        • Painkiller

          2 months ago

          Its a tough call either way. I would go based off of needs more then anything. You cant move gimenez contract its superbloated. Its wether or not you think clement/lukes are the real deal. You bring bichette back with the okamoto signing where do you play barger and clement you being Tucker in where do you play schneider/Lukes.
          As for bichette and Tucker I think Tucker is a better fit hes a left hander who would help split the rightie heavy they have. While bichette has more hits Tucker has more patience and more base smarts. Indicated by his 20 triples 119SBs. He walks at a much higher rate then bichette and strikes out less then bichette. I think the jays learned a valuable lesson during the world series.. when the hit to contact philosophy dries up or struggles its nice to hit those solo homers. Dodgers did that in game 7 say what you will about the pitch selection but whwn the jays pitchers left a meat ball over the plate they make them pay.

          1
          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          So could Clement.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          Says the rando that thinks Gimenez could be a gold glove shortstop. FrozenRopes, Gimenez is only a major leaguer because of his contract. Otherwise he would never start based on his bat.

          Reply
        • greg1

          2 months ago

          Agreed, but it is also not enough for you to suggest he couldn’t win one at SS.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          He can’t win one greg1. There is a reason he was moved to second base. He’s not even the best defensive shortstop on his own team. That belongs to Clement.

          Reply
        • greg1

          2 months ago

          One, to suggest Clement is better, that’s unfounded. Whether he can or not, I imagine we’ll find out if they don’t re-sign Bo.

          Reply
        • NoSaint

          2 months ago

          @greg1

          For their careers at SS, Clement had a 7 DRS and 5 OAA in about 600 innings. In about 750 innings, Gimenez has 6 and 8 DRS/OAA. Gimenez played about 120 innings at SS in ’25. Clement had 170. Wouldn’t the better player have gotten more time at SS?

          Reply
        • greg1

          2 months ago

          Not really when you had Gimmy ingrained at 2B during the regular season. If the Jays felt Clement was the better SS, they would have had Barger play 3B, Clement at SS and Gimmy at 2B during the playoffs. Last I checked, that isn’t the way the club went. I guess you know more than the Jays management and John S during the WS run.

          Reply
        • NoSaint

          2 months ago

          @greg1

          In your post I replied to you wrote,”One, to suggest Clement is better, that’s unfounded.”. I provided career numbers (to increase the sample size) to demonstrate that Clement is just as good if not marginally better than Gimenez at SS. This counters your “unfounded” statement with data. Instead you chose to deflect to a new line of argument of roster construction in the playoffs. Where is your data to support your argument?
          The comment suggesting I know more than their management team was just a little over the top defensive though, but truly telling.

          1
          Reply
        • Bux Co.

          2 months ago

          I would play Springer in LF and DH Santander

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          Clement played more three bag because he has a better arm than Gimenez, and for those who’ve watched he’s better on the left side than Gimenez. Ask Cleveland why they moved Gimenez to second – hint: he’s not a Gold Glove calibre defender at short.

          No Saint provided some facts, and if Gimenez had an arm or a bat he would play third base. Clement moves around because he’s the better defender on the left side.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          It’s simple, as you know NoSaint. Clement plays more third because Gimenez does not have the arm. Because of that, plus the Bo factor, Jays played the guy that accumulated more innings at third (Clement) than Gimenez. Greg has never watched Clement D up.

          Reply
        • Avory

          2 months ago

          @its_happening

          Actually, while it may be true that Gimenez doesn’t have a gun for an arm (he actually is left-handed; he converted to right-handed throwing as a kid when he was told that catchers couldn’t be left-handed. Catching was his first love, so he switched throwing arms! There is a tangible benefit to his glove hand being his strong hand, however; think how good your glove hand could be if it was your dominant one.)

          But you’re wrong about Cleveland’s evaluation of Andres; they had absolutely no worries about Gimenez’s arm. It’s perfectly adequate to play SS and extremely accurate. In fact, Andres was installed as the team’s shortstop in 2021 when he had an outstanding camp after being acquired in the Lindor trade. Unfortunately, the pressure he put on himself to fill Lindor’s shoes rattled him, and Andres was sent to the minors to regain his footing. By the time he came back up later in the season, Amad Rosario (the other shortstop acquired for Lindor) had been installed in the job and was hitting, so Cleveland eased Gimenez back into the lineup as a 2B. Amad was clearly the inferior shortstop, but Cleveland didn’t want to mess with Rosario’s game at the time and they left him at SS.

          By the time 2022 rolled around, Rosario had solidified his bat in the lineup and, having nowhere else to play him (CLE had previously tried him in the OF with no success, and he just didn’t have the footwork or ability to throw across his body at 2B) so they just left him at SS and made Gimenez the 2B, even though Rosario was clearly the poorer defender. Andres, being a gifted athlete, took to 2B beautifully and became a platinum award winner there. But it wasn’t that Gimenez couldn’t be a Gold Glover at SS, it’s that CLE needed Rosario’s bat in the lineup and unfortunately had nowhere to play the guy where he wouldn’t be an even worse everyday defender.

          Gimenez ending up at 2B had everything to do with Amad Rosario’s limitations and nothing about Andres’. Even though Adres Gimenez thrilled them with his play at 2B, Cleveland fans chafed the entire time having to put up with a bad defender at shortstop and a great shortstop like Gimenez playing second base.

          It’s ironic that Toronto fell into moving Gimenez to SS and the fans realizing how improved their infield defense was without Bo at SS when the same dynamic had long been happening in CLE but Gimenez never got the chance to show his chops at SS there after the first few ill-fated weeks in 2021 because someone became ensconced there.

          Reply
    • Marksman18

      2 months ago

      Some of these pieces need to start falling. 5 weeks until pitchers and catchers report!!

      5
      Reply
      • Astros71

        2 months ago

        Tucker isn’t a catcher/pitcher.

        4
        Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          2 months ago

          Just a thought, but Bo and Vlad have proved they can coexist. The jury would be out on whether Tucker and Vlad will.

          Chemistry and egos are tricky things among teammates and especially new ones sometimes. It is not always plug and play like people think.

          7
          Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          2 months ago

          Yup I don’t see Tucker being a good fit chemistry-wise either. And if they sign him over Bichette that will be like a double whammy for team cohesion. I think it would be a huge mistake to choose Tucker over Bo. But I wouldn’t put it past Clueless Ross to do something like that.

          6
          Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          2 months ago

          Okay so what do you think is going to happen Anthony? Fascinated to hear your take.

          Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          2 months ago

          Of course, it’s part of the fun Antony. I don’t think anyone here thinks they are an expert on anything. It’s the nature of these message boards to spout out our preferences, opinions, & theories.

          2
          Reply
        • scissormetimbers

          2 months ago

          Baseball you play as a team, but everything in this game is individual. Its not like tucker is taking the last shot over vlad, chemistry on the field in Baseball doesnt exist.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          Chemistry on the field doesn’t exist? Umm, they have signals and communicate with one another. Communication is chemistry. Pitchers and catchers have chemistry. If you don’t understand that or believe chemistry in baseball doesn’t exist, you’re in the wrong forum.

          1
          Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          2 months ago

          Chemistry is definitely a real thing in the clubhouse. Toronto had that going in spades last season and that tight cohesion of the entire group was what pushes good teams to greatness. (The New York Mets are the opposite example, toxic clubhouse culture and players butting heads contributed greatly to a lost season.) Another example of positive team chemistry on display is the Seattle Seahawks locker room this year. All those players talk about is being selfless and playing to make your brother look great. I think having that team-first mentality (chemistry) is essential for any team that aspires to greatness.

          2
          Reply
  2. Gunnar Henderson Bowman 1st

    2 months ago

    Be crazy if the Jays land King Tuck. That would be a loaded lineup. Definitely would have to make a trade from their poistion player group if they get Tucker.

    2
    Reply
    • Astros71

      2 months ago

      Lukes

      1
      Reply
      • Mr. Pessimist

        2 months ago

        No way! Both Dalton Varsho and Davis Schneider are the odd men out. Varsho’s elite defense should be enticing to clubs around MLB – but his bat (and a horrible head up the @ss lead off 3rd by Kiner-Falefa) is what kept the Jays from adding a 3rd World Series title to the franchise.

        Miles Straw can handle late inning duties in CF in tight games giving Tucker, Lukes, Barger and Springer all chances for OF reps with some good balance.

        I do hope they extend Bo as well. He is one of the homegrown faces of the franchise with Vlad so that should be the main priority. But with Springer, Varsho and Straw all as free agents after 2026, the Jays OF does need some work for the future.

        With the acquisition of Okamoto and hopefully Bo as well, the Jays infield is in good shape and virtually no place for Davis Schneider. By trading Varsho and Schneider, the Jays should be able to land a high end late inning reliever or closer.

        5
        Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          2 months ago

          Who exactly do you see playing CF if they trade varsho? Over the last 3 years Tucker’s range has been in the 10th percentile, did not qualify, and 25th percentile. He’s not a CF.

          1
          Reply
        • gomer33

          2 months ago

          Straw would be the one he’s won a CG as a centrefeilder, just doesn’t hit much although he did well last year considering what was expected after that trade.

          1
          Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          2 months ago

          Which is exactly why I don’t think they should trade Varsho. Overall, there’s a pretty big drop off offensively without gaining anything on defense. Varsho can match Straw defensively.

          1
          Reply
        • Rww59

          2 months ago

          And a platoon of Varsho and Straw is elite defense and decent offence

          1
          Reply
        • Mr. Pessimist

          1 month ago

          Varsho is not decent offense. If he was a “decent” bat the city of Toronto would have had a parade in November.

          I fully expect Lukes and Straw to handle CF duties in the absence of Varsho. Given that Varsho (and Springer at age 36/37) is also a free agent next winter, it does make sense that the Jays find another OF and even look to give Straw an extension until a prospect develops.

          2
          Reply
        • its_happening

          1 month ago

          Lukes with Straw and Loperfido. One challenge is Varsho has one year left. It would make some sense trading Varsho if the Jays thought an internal option can cover centre, or if Bellinger is a short term CF option. Not Tucker.

          Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          1 month ago

          @pessimist Varsho had an OPS+ of 122 last season. Where do you think the Jays are going to get a center fielder that can produce at that level and can also play good defense in CF?

          Also since when is an .833 ops not decent offense. It sounds like you’re judging him based on a single AB in a situation where many others have failed. You realize even the best players fail 7 out of 10 times right?

          Also, speaking of the World Series, you realize that if Varsho hadn’t made that amazing catch earlier in the game, the Blue Jays never would have had a chance of winning it in the first place, right?

          1
          Reply
        • its_happening

          1 month ago

          Varsho’s a career .725 OPS with two seasons prior at under .700 and .700 on the nose. His performance last year is the result of playing 71 games. Not only are those numbers misleading, it proves the Jays can move on from Varsho by virtue of surviving over 90 games without him in CF.

          10 RBIs in Colorado over two games. Cant play them all at Coors.

          Reply
      • its_happening

        2 months ago

        Lukes is a bench player at this current roster state.

        1
        Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          1 month ago

          Over the last 4 years, unless you count Aaron Judge, Julio Rodriguez is the only CF who has accrued more WAR than Varsho has. Varsho didn’t reach that last year but with the piece he was on he would have reached it by game 101.

          I see a lot of Blue Jays fans wanting to get rid of him, but who do you guys think is going to replace him that’s going to outproduce him? Despite missing half of last year, he is still averaged over 4.0 WAR per season.

          Even if we just look at 2025, other than Judge, the only three players who accumulated more than 4.0 were Rodriguez PCA, and Byron Buxton.

          I don’t mean to be combative or anything, I’m just genuinely curious where it’s coming from. It’s one of the few things that I tend to disagree with most other Blue Jay fans on.

          1
          Reply
      • WillDS

        2 months ago

        Lukes has options so unless the return is significant that would be a silly move to make

        3
        Reply
    • scissormetimbers

      2 months ago

      Its just one year they need to make it work, injuries will probably sort everything out anyway

      3
      Reply
    • RyanD44

      2 months ago

      If they sign Tucker, they should trade Santander. They did plenty well without him last year, and they have other players that can step in his place.

      2
      Reply
      • Avory

        2 months ago

        Um…so you’re going to pay somebody to take him away? Because the Jays can’t give him away for nothing. Nobody’s going to take him for free. Nobody. There’s no trading him.

        3
        Reply
        • Canuckleball

          2 months ago

          Also, there’s no reason to trade him. He’ll be their full time DH a year from now when Springer walks.

          5
          Reply
        • Avory

          2 months ago

          Sure, the Jays can always designate him to hit. But will he? That’s the question. He’s likely washed up. Why the Jays couldn’t tell the guy was selling out for homers in his last season with the O’s I have no idea. The bat has slowed and so has his pitch recognition. He along with Andres Gimenez are boat anchors. Berrios to a lesser extent.

          Reply
        • BeenThereDoneIt

          2 months ago

          Gimenez is most assuredly not a boat anchor. Is he overpaid a bit? Sure. But he is quite literally one of the top two or 3 defenders in baseball.

          1
          Reply
        • Avory

          2 months ago

          @BeenThereDoneIt

          I’m going to be charitable here and choose to believe you’ve never even looked at his contract obligations. Because there is no one anywhere who believes Andres Gimenez is merely “overpaid a bit.” His contract is so underwater that there’s no hope for it. It is simply one of the worst current contracts in the sport.

          You may console yourself that the Jays can afford such extravagance, but sooner or later it’s going to be a factor that cannot be ignored. Already its mere presence means you can’t go after Bo. You can always find a fine fielding SS who can’t hit, and they cost nothing, but with Andres on the books, Bo becomes impossible to acquire to play 2B. And you’d be much better off with a solid defender at SS who makes peanuts and Bo playing 2B than what you’re heading for now.

          2
          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          2 months ago

          Where are these extra fine fielding and hitting shortstops that cost nothing? Every team could use an extra. Hell the Padres would sign one just to put them somewhere else on the field…

          2
          Reply
        • Colter Wood

          2 months ago

          What are you taking about? First off, Gimenez’s previous three years he was a 7 WAR, 5 WAR, and 4 WAR player. He had a tough 2025 no doubt but he was also hurt. $15M per year for him is not overly excessive. Kim just signed for $20M this season and he’s essentially the same player with a lesser glove. I get the years and total money are different but every year Gimenez’s $15M is less and less impactful based on the market. I’d love to know these elite defensive Shortstops you can get for less than this?

          No doubt we’d like more from him at the plate, but his D cannot be understated.

          6
          Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          2 months ago

          They already have one on their team. Clement’s numbers at shortstop defensively over the last few years are comparable to Gimenez’s. Clement is also a better hitter.

          3
          Reply
        • Colter Wood

          2 months ago

          I love Ernie but his SS metrics really don’t compare to Gimenez. Gimenez is a 4.8+ RF/9 player, this puts him in line with the top 3-5 SS in the league. Ernie sits around 3.65 at SS, that would be essentially league average. Ernie is an elite 3B, a very good 2B, and a league average SS. Gimenez is an elite SS. Ernie was a better hitter last year, agreed. But Ernie is also under contract and it’s really tough to compare a guy who recently signed to a guy still on a Super 2 contract.

          Reply
        • NoSaint

          2 months ago

          @Colter Wood

          If you’re talking about Range Factor per 9 then I suggest using advanced stats like DRS and OAA as better metrics to evaluate a players’ defensive ability. Range Factor uses putouts and assists as it’s variables in the formula. Neither of which measures a players “range”.

          Using DRS/OAA for Clement and Gimenez at SS, Clement comes away with 7 and 5 in about 600 career innings while Gimenez scores 6 and 8 in about 750 career innings. They’re both about the same at SS.

          2
          Reply
        • Avory

          2 months ago

          @Colter Wood

          OMG, is it really that difficult to look up the man’s contract?

          Yes, he makes a “mere” $15 million in 2026. You and I both know that he’ll still be vastly overpaid if he puts up another year anything like 2024, much less 2025.

          But that’s not the point.

          He’s going to be paid (gulp) $23.5 million in 2027!

          And another $23.5 million the year after that!

          And yes, another $23.5 million the year after that!

          You don’t think this would have been better spent on Bo Bichette? Or in almost any other fashion?

          I repeat, no matter how sublime Andres’ defensive skills are, that bat is horrid. Why do you think CLE couldn’t wait to unload him when they saw the writing on the wall? I don’t think they could believe their good fortune when Toronto volunteered to take him off their hands.

          A solid defender at SS is all you really needed. Hell, you put up with Bo all those years, just a cheap upgrade defensively at SS, slide Bo over to 2B and the Jays could probably had Kyle Tucker too (especially if they hadn’t gone out of their freakin’ minds signing that boat anchor Santander).

          Please don’t try and tell me that Gimenez’s contract isn’t an impediment in all this. It’s just not being honest.

          2
          Reply
        • bullred

          2 months ago

          He’s making 14 mil a year after deferrals. Lots of teams would take him. Teams know he was injured this year. Not a big deal. I want the Jays to plug him in the lineup though.

          Reply
        • scissormetimbers

          2 months ago

          His contract isn’t that bad though. You chip in $10M and I think you could trade him..The NPV of his contract was only $12.5M per season. So throw in $10M and its only $10M

          Reply
        • Pylon 2

          2 months ago

          I believe in what your saying and think if they were able to unload both Gimenez’s and Straw Berrios for Marte than you sign both Tucker and Bichette and you have yourself a dynasty. I would even go as far as making an offer to someone like Luiz Alvarez and see if they can make him a decent left fielder. Suck up the extra money for one year. Springer, Gausman, Bieber, contracts are done after 2026, and if Barger improves and Santander bounces back you trade Santander either at the deadline or in the offseason. When you think about it, its not that far fetched. If all 3 expiring contracts want to come back to be part of something special, I guarantee they take a little less money. But I do see them only retaining one of the two pitchers.

          Reply
        • BeenThereDoneIt

          2 months ago

          You can’t get Tucker if you DFA Straw. He was best man in his wedding.

          Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          1 month ago

          There’s no way the Diamondbacks would take three underwater contracts for marte. Any trade for Marte is going to hurt. You won’t be able to get it done for spare parts.

          Reply
      • Midinfieldlifer

        2 months ago

        That would be nice but that’s a tough contract to move. Especially with how poorly he played in ’25

        Reply
      • Mr. Pessimist

        1 month ago

        Santander probably isn’t trade-able after the injury plagued season and the contract he has. Varsho would at least bring back another strong late inning reliever or maybe a 2B man IF the Jays choose Tucker over Bo.

        Again I think Bo staying in Toronto is best for him and the ballclub than signing Tucker.

        The Jays OF mix of Varsho, Lukes, Straw, Springer, Barger (RF at times) and Santander (LF at times) is more than adequate for at least the 2026 season. Then worry about 2027 and beyond after things get going.

        The infield mix Okamoto (3B/1B), Gimenez (SS/2B), Bichette (2B/SS), Clement (3B/SS/2B), Barger (3B/2B) and Vlad (1B/DH) is also more than adequate and even a bit of an upgrade from 2026 with the addition of Okamoto hopefully.

        2
        Reply
  3. Shadowpartner

    2 months ago

    Glad this is taking forever. Just like the other free agents. Lets just drag it out until March.

    1
    Reply
  4. Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

    2 months ago

    Go get’em Jays! Maybe the rest of the AL East will get motivated too

    1
    Reply
  5. angt222

    2 months ago

    Where does Bo go if Toronto signs Tucker?

    Reply
    • tippy457

      2 months ago

      Hopefully the Red Sox

      2
      Reply
      • FenwayMonster

        2 months ago

        Not if the Sox re-sign Bregman.

        1
        Reply
    • Joemo

      2 months ago

      CWS or PIT

      This comment is only like 50% sarcasm because those teams actually have made some decent waves this off-season.

      5
      Reply
    • Diggydugler

      2 months ago

      Dodgers 🙁

      1
      Reply
      • bestone

        2 months ago

        I figured he would have been a Dodger already….

        Reply
    • Dustyslambchops23

      2 months ago

      What about the braves ?

      Reply
  6. Astros71

    2 months ago

    Sign Tucker! The only thing that may stop Toronto is the bullpen.

    Also this isn’t clickbait.

    1
    Reply
    • scissormetimbers

      2 months ago

      Its good enough and they have the prospects to aquire one at the deadline.

      2
      Reply
      • Astros71

        2 months ago

        Jealous of the Blue Jays farm.

        Reply
  7. Never Remember

    2 months ago

    All the money is a drop in the bucket for the money printing machine known as Roger’s

    Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      2 months ago

      Manuutebol,

      The Pirates are consistently one of the most profitable teams in baseball. They won’t die anytime soon.

      Reply
    • Jaysfansince92

      2 months ago

      Woah… Where did that come from? Did he make another comment somewhere else that I missed?

      2
      Reply
    • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

      2 months ago

      You lost me here. He is talking about an owner having deep pockets, what does that have to do with celebrating the death of other teams?

      1
      Reply
  8. bucsfan0004

    2 months ago

    Tucker is a nice player, but do the Jays really need another outfielder for this upcoming year? Just sign the best outfielder available next offseason

    1
    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      2 months ago

      Tucker is better than any OF free agent next year (If Acuna does not get his option picked up he is clearly cooked). and Varso is is a pending FA as is Springer. So it makes sense to go for Tucker now. Santander will be DH or benched next year so easy open spot, and they still need to re-sign Varsho or sign other defense first CF. Obviously some or all of Lukes/Loperfido/Davis Schneider would be dropped if they sign Tucker. Also maybe they make a big splash with a Barger trade? who knows. Worry about trading the cheap guys later.

      1
      Reply
    • longsuffering

      2 months ago

      Next years OF free agents aren’t that great.

      3
      Reply
  9. Acoss1331

    2 months ago

    Good on the Blue Jays for hitting the accelerator when they have a chance to be right back in the World Series again and taking advantage of the opportunity to win now.

    6
    Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      2 months ago

      They also have playoff money to spend. And not just regular playoff money. Broadcasting the only team in the country playoff money.

      5
      Reply
      • Acoss1331

        2 months ago

        The way it’s going, it’s probably going to be a Dodgers vs. Blue Jays World Series. Both teams aren’t stopping, so congrats and enjoy possibly a three-peat.

        4
        Reply
      • bestone

        2 months ago

        They also have the benefit of my increased cell phone bill.

        Reply
      • bullred

        1 month ago

        I heard that they got over 200 Mil in Playoff money. If that’s true then no wonder they can go after whoever they want.

        1
        Reply
    • Avory

      2 months ago

      @Acoss1331

      Clearly you don’t know how baseball works. No matter how much you spend, or how much you want it, there’s no guarantee you’ll get to the top of the mountain.

      But by all means, spend all you got. I’m not complaining about it. At this point, though, every dollar you spend has diminishing utility. You can’t move the luck needle with $$$$.

      2
      Reply
      • Another Dodgers Fan

        2 months ago

        Avory,

        Maximizing the odds is a real thing. Whatever happens after that happens.

        All you can do is put yourself in the best position to succeed. And I’m thankful my team is willing to do just that. If a random team makes the playoffs and is scorching hot throughout? If they win they win. For for them.

        Happened with Arizona a few years ago. Life moves on.

        If you do your best and fail, it’s something you can accept. Get up and do your best again. That’s just life.

        3
        Reply
        • Avory

          2 months ago

          Oh for god’s sake, this isn’t about homilies related to some sad sacks who get knocked down and pick themselves up again; this is about behemoths who think they need even more artillery to obliterate their competition when said competition is already outgunned. While such assurances may work in war, this is baseball, and you can’t control for luck, even though you think you can with just one more itsy-bitsy, teeny-weeny $100 million contract.

          This is pure economics. At some point (and the Dodgers and Jays are right there) those extra dollars spent represent diminished marginal utility. Each dollar you spend gets you less and less than the previous one did.

          But hey, spend away! You’ll be one day closer to the Day of Reckoning, when you’ll decide you can’t do it anymore and what you did didn’t guarantee squat.

          Everyone acts like spending all the way up the ladder leads to preordained outcomes. They don’t. Just ask the Mets and Phillies. And I suspect the Jays will learn that hard lesson after 2026.

          Reply
        • C-Daddy

          2 months ago

          If your comment had a point then I must have missed it.

          The two teams (Yankees and Dodgers) that have made the playoffs virtually every season over the last few decades are the ones that consistently spend lots of money. Yeah, spending doesn’t guarantee you a title because the playoffs can be pretty random, but it gives you a shot every year.

          8
          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          2 months ago

          Avory,

          If I’m understanding you correctly, you think is stupid for the Dodgers to spend more money because at this point the gains are small compared to the investment.

          And since any team can spend money and lose, why spend more?

          If the Dodgers spending $500m instead of $300m isn’t going to move the needle, be happy they are the test case for every other team thinking about spending money, and proving you right.

          For the other point, did you forget that 2023 happened? Arizona ran the table with their massive $112m payroll. Everyone in baseball knows it just takes a team getting hot at the right time to wreck everyone’s plans.

          There are no preordained outcomes in baseball. All you can do is all you can do.

          1
          Reply
      • Jaysfansince92

        2 months ago

        That’s debatable. I remember reading an article from fangraphs that said, a great hitting team adding a great hitter will benefit from it more than a poor hitting team. Said great hitter will have more opportunities to do damage in a better lineup.

        2
        Reply
  10. Fraham_

    2 months ago

    Better fit than Bichette since a lot of his contractual value comes from the fact he can play middle infield. They have enough there and should just get the best player available.
    Springer DH
    Tucker RF
    Vlad 1B
    Varsho CF
    Kirk C
    Okamoto 3B
    Clement 2B
    Gimenez SS
    With barger and Schneider bouncing around that’s pretty elite. Trade Lukes for bullpen

    1
    Reply
    • Scott_11

      2 months ago

      You forgot about Santandar.

      1
      Reply
      • Fraham_

        2 months ago

        Yeah I meant Santander in LF

        Reply
    • Diggydugler

      2 months ago

      The lineup is a lot better than you are making it out to be if they sign Tucker.. Barger or Santander would be 4th depending on if Santander bounces back. Varsho/Kirk would be lower and Okamoto higher. Also Ernie would play SS against lefties I hope and Davis can play 2B, hell maybe Barger can play 2B sometimes.

      2
      Reply
    • BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

      2 months ago

      Still want to see Bo with Tucker.

      Bo should be available around 7 and $175….. it’s just money, and gosh knows Roger’s prints enough of it.

      3
      Reply
    • its_happening

      2 months ago

      Springer DH
      Vlad 1B
      Bo 2B
      Barger RF
      Kirk C
      Okamoto 3B
      Santander LF
      Clement SS
      Varsho CF

      That’s a better lineup.

      3
      Reply
      • Jaysfansince92

        2 months ago

        I like the idea of bringing Bo back more as well. I just don’t trust Tucker come playoff time. I know some people will say it’s just small sample size, but I think the reason Tucker struggles in the playoffs is because he has a hard time with elite velocity. In the playoffs in high leverage situations, the average velocity is 97.8.

        Last season he hit .219 with a .333 wOBA against 97 plus which is in line with his career numbers. Bo on the other hand hit .448 with a 516 wOBA against 97 plus.

        Bo also hit a 100 mph fastball from Ohtani in game 7 for that home run. I think Tucker only has one career home run against 100 mph.

        1
        Reply
        • Fraham_

          2 months ago

          I mean in a big rebound year for Bichette he still had a lower WAR than Tucker’s “down year”. I understand the playoff concerns but I think that is significantly less reliable than large samples of regular season play

          1
          Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          2 months ago

          The thing that concerns me is the reason why I think he’s struggling in the playoffs, which seems to be due to the velocity. He has a large sample size against high velocity in the regular season and hasn’t performed particularly well there either.

          1
          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          2 months ago

          Frahman,

          Not as much as you would think. Regular season stats are awesome. But being clutch when it counts is a valuable skillset.

          I’ll use the dodgers as an example. Every off-season I hear fans say they should let Muncy go and “upgrade” at third base. Check their record when he’s in the lineup and out. And in the postseason? He’s extremely clutch. And that’s when it matters. The moment isn’t too much for him, and it shows.

          Same with Kike, and Rojas. And Chris Taylor before Father time took him down.

          The Jays should make the playoffs. It’s what happens when you get there that matters. And you need the right players to do it. Bo on one leg was as clutch as it gets for the Jays. Yes there were others who were also clutch. But that’s a winning player for a playoff team.

          Someone complain about Kikes regular season stats again. Playoff Kike doesn’t care.

          Playoff Vlad was extremely impressive. Why not keep playoff Bo?

          2
          Reply
        • Fraham_

          2 months ago

          I would argue it’s tough to measure clutch. Yes maybe some players handle pressure better than others but these are professional athletes and you can’t expect some great player is going to perform significantly worse in a big moment. Players go through cycles of seeing the ball well and slumps which can both happen in the postseason.

          Bichette has 52 postseason PAs with a worse OPS than his career regular OPS and it was good he came back and showed he was healthy but regardless of his performance the 3000+ regular PAs are representative of how good a player he is.

          If the jays got either Bichette or Tucker that would be great for them but my point is I think Tucker would definitely be better. I’ll also disagree with the Muncy thing I think he’s a very solid 3B (offensively).

          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          2 months ago

          Fair enough.

          Tucker is an excellent player. Bo is an excellent player. There isn’t a lot of downside in choosing either of you’re the Jays.

          Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          2 months ago

          Bo’s playoff slash line is .311/.385/.400. That’s pretty solid. Especially since it’s weighed down by the 0/8 he took in his first playoff year. Since then he’s been much better. His OPS in 2023 was 1.000 and in 2025 it was .923.

          In 279 PA Tucker’s postseason line is .233/.317.376. In ascending order here is Tucker’s BA over his last 7 playoff series: 0.00, .143, .154, .154, .190, .250, .273. In those seven playoff series combined, he drove in a total of seven runs (only 1 more than Bo drove in over the course of the world series).

          Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          2 months ago

          Just to add what I wrote above, of those seven runs batted for Tucker 5 of them came in one game against Aaron Nola on pair of home runs on a 91.1 MPH fastball and an 86.1 MPH changeup. The rest of those games he played over the course of those seven playoff series he drove in a total of two runs.

          In 279 PA in the postseason. He has never homered off of a fastball above 97 mph. Velocity shuts him down.

          Reply
      • Fraham_

        2 months ago

        I would disagree if you want to sit Gimenez which would be surprising I still think Tucker over Bichette outweighs any defensive downgrade of moving Barger to 2B

        Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          2 months ago

          I don’t think they’re going to play Barger at second. To the best of my knowledge, he has zero experience at middle infield. I think the reason he wants Gimenez on the bench is to get Clement into the lineup. His defensive numbers at shortstop are actually quite comparable to Gimenez’s.

          Reply
        • Fraham_

          2 months ago

          I would agree Clement is probably better than Gimenez never understood that trade when it happened. Barger played middle infield in the minors and obviously the Jays know more than us but he’s a young player who’s better at 3B than OF so I assume he’d be able to handle 2B fine.

          We’ll see what they do but I think the jays the would be better off adding the higher ceiling player in Tucker. I think their middle infield depth would still be fine with Barger (if he can play), Gimenez, clement, Schneider

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          Fraham- Gimenez should not be starting over anyone if Bo is re-signed. Clement should be the starting shortstop.

          Reply
        • Avory

          2 months ago

          That would make Andres Gimenez the highest paid reserve in the history of the game, if not in 2026, then definitely in 2027-2029.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          That is correct Avory. And if Tucker is signed we could be looking at Santander.

          Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          2 months ago

          No point in letting money stop you from fielding the best team when you’re spending this amount of cash. If Clement helps the team win more games than Gimenez, he should start. That being said, it would suck having someone on the bench making that much money.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          Barger at second base! Aaaaahahahahahahahaha

          Reply
        • Avory

          2 months ago

          @its_happening

          Santander won’t make near as much money in those four years (2026-2029) as Gimenez, that’s how bad Andres’ contract is. Santander’s is awful, Gimenez’s contract is unspeakably bad.

          Reply
        • its_happening

          2 months ago

          Nobody denies that.

          Reply
    • Mr. Pessimist

      1 month ago

      Nah. Keep Lukes and Santander for OF reps.

      Trade Varsho and Schneider for a late inning reliever or 2B man if Bo leaves.

      Reply
      • its_happening

        1 month ago

        Pessimist, load up prospects to trade or keep. Jays need some minor league talent.

        Reply
  11. bernbabybern

    2 months ago

    Yankees from the top rope!

    Reply
    • Salzilla

      2 months ago

      Nah, I don’t think they’re looking to spend that kind of money.

      I’m shocked LAD aren’t all over this though with a flying hurracanrana.

      2
      Reply
      • bernbabybern

        2 months ago

        I think the Dodgers are lurking with a short term, high AAV contract.

        2
        Reply
      • Another Dodgers Fan

        2 months ago

        Dodgers are in a position to sit back and watch. There are a number of free agents who would be a good fit for them. If they let the other teams beat each other up signing a few guys, they can possibly make a later signing when the market cools off.

        It might facilitate getting someone on a shorter term deal than they wanted. And if you’re one of the last big dogs left on the board, going to the dodgers for a high aav and and good chance of getting to the WS, that’s not a bad consolation prize.

        Or they have a plan and are just waiting for whatever Friedman said they needed to be patient for. Plus, they have Alex Call.

        2
        Reply
        • 14thor

          2 months ago

          I hope Tucker and Bo sign elsewhere than LA. I want to see what Alex Freeland can do and the OFs lurking in the pipeline like Josue DePaula, Zyhir Hope and Mike Sirota.
          I’m sick of seeing the homegrown talent shipped out or allowed to walk after proving they’re worth the salt.(Seager, not Bellinger.)

          Reply
        • bullred

          2 months ago

          I think Tucker wants to sign with the Dodgers right now but is waiting for more length in their offer. Otherwise he would have signed with the Jays already. I think he probably just takes the Dodgers offer in the end.

          Reply
  12. Therealeman

    2 months ago

    The Jays see the Dodgers as their true competitor and want to build a comparably intimidating lineup.

    2
    Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      2 months ago

      Good for them. I’m glad to see them going all in. It’s good for baseball.

      5
      Reply
    • BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

      2 months ago

      They have “spoken” like they are both the dodgers and cardinals for years, in terms of culture, evaluations, etc

      It has been infuriating listening to their leadership over the years, wondering how their heads fit through the door on the way to the pressers

      But when it finally clicked….it was not a bad ride.

      3
      Reply
      • Another Dodgers Fan

        2 months ago

        They took it as close as you can get without getting the prize. Pretty damn good by any standards.

        2
        Reply
  13. scruffmcgruff

    2 months ago

    Even though I’m an O’s guy, the Jays getting Tucker makes for an even more interesting AL East. And it would be another all in move for a team that was so close to a world series title.

    2
    Reply
  14. Taejonguy

    2 months ago

    With a lockout likely in 2027, Blue Jays windows is very short. All in to get the WS makes sense. Especially if they can get a cheap year this year with bigger payouts near the end of the contract

    1
    Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      2 months ago

      If there’s a lockout, teams don’t have to pay for missed games. So there’s that.

      4
      Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        2 months ago

        It boggles my mind that people think a possible lockout/stoppage looming is the MLB apocalypse. They may miss a few 2027 games if it even gets that far and then it’s business as usual when neither side wants to lose revenue/income.

        3
        Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          2 months ago

          Baseball is really making a comeback worldwide. They would be foolish to slow that momentum down too much.

          Negotiations have to happen and things need to be agreed to, but don’t be stupid about it.

          Reply
        • bullred

          2 months ago

          If the past is any indicator they are very foolish.

          Reply
  15. LFGMets (Metsin7) #BannedAgain&Again&AgainFireStearns

    2 months ago

    Trey Yesavage, Kirk, and Anthony Santander (full contract) for Kodai Senga, who says no?

    Reply
    • metsgolf

      2 months ago

      Me.

      1
      Reply
    • The Chet Steadman

      2 months ago

      That’s about the dumbest thing I’ve read on here in a while

      6
      Reply
    • NoSaint

      2 months ago

      @LFGMets (Metsin7) #BannedAgain&Again&AgainFireStearns

      Me too.

      Reply
    • BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

      2 months ago

      Throw in some GameStop stock…..

      2
      Reply
    • Salzilla

      2 months ago

      👀

      Reply
    • Mr. Pessimist

      1 month ago

      Are you fcking nuts?!

      Reply
    • Jaysfansince92

      1 month ago

      Absolutely the Jays. The Mets would try to get that trade finalized as quick as they possibly could, while desperately trying to keep a straight face.

      1
      Reply
  16. gold masters

    2 months ago

    Gifted World Series win from the blue jays.

    Reply
  17. kodion

    2 months ago

    Could the Jays be doing some roster-management work in preparation for signing one of these guys? By that, I mean exploring a trade for top-level pitching, including MLB-talent from the Jays, that might impact whether Kyle or Bo would be the better fit after any trade. Either one makes the Jays better.
    My preference would be Tucker because he helps balance the line-up left and right and will hold his value better. But he WILL be expensive
    I am a huge fan of Bo, and have been since I started following him in the minors. That bat, healthy and perhaps supported by reduced defensive responsibilities, is elite. He’s a professional hitter and will do well wherever he ends up.
    Bo moving on will not hurt as much if Kyle moves in but that hurt will be back many times over if he ends up in Boston or New York. Go west, young man!

    3
    Reply
    • BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

      2 months ago

      I would imagine the roster management would be bullpen related, or ideally moving Barrios (which would easily allow for Bo and Tucker)

      They are certainly out of Paxton Schultz’s to drop off the 40 man

      Reply
    • bullred

      2 months ago

      Bo almost needs to just be a Dh/2b at this point but the bat is legendary.

      Reply
    • Mr. Pessimist

      1 month ago

      I’ll be ok if Bo leaves Toronto – only to the Cubs.

      If he ends up in LA, BOS or NYY then that is just another huge slap in the face by Atkins and the front office.

      If it ultimately comes down to either signing Tucker or Bo leaving to either LA, BOS, NYY, then it’s a no brainer to stop that and give Bo exactly what he wants/is asking for and leave others to battle for Tucker sweepstakes. I agree with another opinion I saw above – if Tucker truly is interested in playing in Toronto he would’ve signed by now.

      1
      Reply
      • Jaysfansince92

        1 month ago

        It would make me physically ill to see Bichette in a Yankees uniform. The Red Sox or Dodgers wouldn’t feel much better, but I would never forgive them if they let Bichette go to the Yankees.

        Reply
  18. Datashark

    2 months ago

    Bo is not the same Bo and Jays know this. Tucker meanwhile still has his legs in working order as well as the bat with 20+ HR power.

    Bo lost his speed and is no longer a plus at SS, He may get 15-19 HRs
    He is basically a 2B or DH that has a plus hit

    Tucker is a much better fit in Toronto.

    2
    Reply
    • BeenThereDoneIt

      2 months ago

      Bo quite literally just had one of his best years of his career and it would have been way better if he didn’t miss the last month of the season.

      1
      Reply
      • Datashark

        2 months ago

        usually players do have their best season in contract years its quiet a motivation. I think Bo is good but he has lost some of his edge as injuries have taken toll

        Reply
        • BeenThereDoneIt

          2 months ago

          This wasn’t his best season though.

          Reply
        • Datashark

          2 months ago

          best meaning playing top notch to get best deal they can.

          Reply
  19. BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

    2 months ago

    I still want both Tucker and Bo

    Much easier if Berrios and Santander can somehow be moved and they should movable.

    Okamotos money isn’t real money….the Jays are going to double his $15 million in Japanese’s broadcasting rights, ads, and merch…hands down

    They would have to make hard decisions moving Barger, and or Clement for high leverage bullpen help or a closer. Not sure how much Lukes or Davis will actually garner

    Straw will have little trade value, and Tucker was Straws best man….so….if Tucker comes to town Straw is at-least here next year.

    Tucker is the top 4 of the order left handed bat the jays have needed for over 2 decades……..it’s hilariously long…..Carlos Delgado left in 2004. 2015’s best team in baseball had Chris Colabello, Ben Revere, Justin Smoak As left handed hitters… Jays just haven’t had top of the order left handed bats….but I still want Bo and Tucker…… luxury tax be damned. I will switch my Internet to Roger’s if they do

    3
    Reply
    • Avory

      2 months ago

      Santander and Berrios are “moveable”? Hilarious.

      Maybe if you send along all but about $5 million they’re owed….

      You guys are pounding too many Molsons. You’re drunk with unrealistic expectations.

      3
      Reply
      • BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

        2 months ago

        Berrios is very movable and Santander is only
        Making like 13 a year with the rest deferred and 1 year removed from 40+ bombs.

        For the drunk part absolutely we are but it’s rye whiskey….also Canadian and you’re welcome.

        Reply
        • BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

          2 months ago

          If Barrios throws up a sub 4 era (highly possible) he ops out of the remaining 2 years and goes to market.

          He would be the opening day starter on a third on the leagues teams.

          Reply
        • Avory

          2 months ago

          @BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

          Santander is not “making like 13 a year,” he’s making $16.5 million the next two years, an average of $14 million the two years after that AND he makes $5 million a year from age 40 until 51.

          Good luck getting somebody to take on those obligations for a washed-up player.

          1
          Reply
        • Salzilla

          2 months ago

          If by a third you mean 3 teams then sure. He could start for the A’s, White Sox, and Rockies…after that nope. Every team has better options.

          But let’s say you flip him to one of those, he could be packaged up to bring back a Luis Robert or Brenton Doyle or a Lawerence Butler should they not get Tucker.

          1
          Reply
        • BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

          2 months ago

          Just looking for salary relief. For his behaviour with the playoff roster construction I would be happy with “cash considerations” in return. Aka an in and out burger from Sacramento. Not a combo….just a burger.

          And he’s not that bad….

          Reply
        • BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

          2 months ago

          @Avory Dude….. why are you so mad.

          Reply
        • Avory

          2 months ago

          Um…because I prefer to deal in facts, not wishful thinking?

          Believing Berrios is “opening day” quality as a starter is just another ludicrous assertion. Even the Chicago White Sox have a better guy (2.3 WAR Shane Smith) than Berrios to trot out there .

          1
          Reply
        • bullred

          2 months ago

          “where his face-value AAV is $18.5 million, though actual accounting for luxury tax (CBT) is lower due to salary deferrals, with figures around $13.7 million-$14.3 million depending on the source”.
          Google it!

          Reply
        • Avory

          2 months ago

          And how many teams have luxury tax considerations? And among those, how many are stupid enough to gum up their roster with a costly paper weight like Santander? You can defer money all you want, you still OWE it. Wake up.

          Reply
        • Jaysfansince92

          1 month ago

          The thing that makes Berrios quite hard to move is that if he pitches well they only get him for one year because he’s going to opt out. If he doesn’t pitch well then they’re stuck with him for 3 years. The risk is higher than the reward.

          Reply
        • bullred

          1 month ago

          I don’t want the Jays to move Berrios. He has been very consistent and I’m sure he will give the Jays 160 innings this year at the same 4 era. That is great production from him for a 18 mil AAV. He is great early in the year seems to tire later in the year.

          Reply
        • bullred

          1 month ago

          Be loyal to the dude as he has been loyal to the Jays.

          Reply
  20. Joeypower

    2 months ago

    Blue jays AAA team will be filled with some serious talent if they keep adding to the mlb roster like this.

    Reply
  21. Willj

    2 months ago

    No way should anyone go beyond 8 years or $300M for this guy

    1
    Reply
  22. wvsteve

    2 months ago

    Sorry fans. Slow day. Not one ML free agent signing

    Reply
  23. seamaholic 2

    2 months ago

    When the effing Blue Jays are spending more than the NFL Salary Cap, you need an MLB Salary Cap.

    1
    Reply
    • Canuckleball

      2 months ago

      Why?

      1
      Reply
      • seamaholic 2

        2 months ago

        Because it’s out of control. NFL rosters are twice as big and the league pulls in multiple times more revenue. It’s very obvious that a few MLB teams are exploiting the local TV revenue loophole, and that will cause fans of other teams to gradually lose interest. The Washington Generals don’t have a fanbase. League is being saved by the fact that all the big spenders are in the coastal divisions so the low revenue teams in the Centrals can still win something, but that’s weird too.

        Just do the effing cap and floor. Everyone wins, including the players.

        1
        Reply
        • ClevelandSteelEngines

          2 months ago

          How is that remotely logical? Apples and Oranges don’t add up to Cherries.

          1
          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          2 months ago

          Revenue is up. Viewership is up. Baseball isn’t in danger. And the players will NEVER accept a cap.

          Reply
        • ClevelandSteelEngines

          2 months ago

          It’s about getting fans to believe it’s justified to get the sport back on the field after a lockout. They are playing for hearts and minds in the lead up to the next lockout. Seamaholic is probably going to be someone who says it as loud as possible because his heart and mind are already made up. He’s saying just submit.

          1
          Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      2 months ago

      “We’re out of control! Stop us before we spend again!”

      Approximately zero fans should believe this crocodile tears act. The number who do is pretty remarkable. The owners will thank them, I’m sure.

      1
      Reply
    • Ducey

      2 months ago

      NFL has like 18 games. MLB has 162. Same size stadiums.

      Reply
      • This one belongs to the Reds

        2 months ago

        NFL fills them up every week. MLB fills them up a few times each year, the rest of the time half empty or even more some places that have no hope.

        Reply
        • BeenThereDoneIt

          2 months ago

          You didn’t see Rogers center from June on last year did you?

          Reply
  24. guilderc

    2 months ago

    They should just sign Tucker and Bichette. My Yankees don’t seem to wanna bring in anybody this off-season and somebody has to challenge the LAD

    2
    Reply
  25. phillyballers

    2 months ago

    I just don’t see the type of return that should warrant a 10/350-400M contract. I don’t think he’s going to produce a 7-8 WAR season. Like he is a good player, but a 4 to 5.5 bWAR. If it was a shorter deal, I think 30-40 AAV would make sense like a 5 year or 6 with an opt out in there. But not a premium position, some injuries the last 2 years, going into year 29. If it was 10/275M, I think that’s a reasonable offer in today’s game for a guy that isn’t franchise altering, but could be the 2nd best player in your lineup.

    Reply
    • pingston

      2 months ago

      My guess is that what you’re talking here is what’s being talked about with the Tucker and Bo agents — I think where they’re going is 99% done but the contract remuneration fine print is still being negotiated… Perhaps including issues around a strike/lock-out…

      Reply
      • BeenThereDoneIt

        2 months ago

        I think it has more to do with deferrals thank anything else. They are trying to reduce the hit this year until the cbt number becomes more manageable in the next couple of years.

        Reply
  26. Asfan0780

    2 months ago

    300 mill payroll and I feel spoiled as an A’s fan and their payroll hovering around $100 mill

    Reply
  27. gr81t2

    2 months ago

    When did the blue jays rob a bank? Where all this extra cash come from?

    1
    Reply
    • BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

      2 months ago

      It’s been reported they made $50+ million on the playoff run (they own the Canadian tv network that broadcasts there games….meaing they were able to increase ad spends for the playoffs, and also owned the Canadian broadcast, so they while we all got fox or whoever ran the World Series we also had an amazing local feed with Buck and Dan broadcasting…..all with premium ad spots)

      Plus their owner is legit a massive corporation. The jays represent less than 1% of their actual operating expenses…..the jays budget is a rounding error for them.

      1
      Reply
      • Steven Protomanni

        2 months ago

        Over 100 million according to an article yesterday.

        Reply
        • stormie

          2 months ago

          Haven’t seen the article, but $100 million actually seems light. Rogers’ Q3 media revenue was up $156 million from 2024, which they attributed almost entirely to the Jays. That means the Jays were generating close to an extra $50 million a month from July to September on top of whatever they made in 2024. Even if revenue tripled yoy, which seems unlikely, then they were still pulling in $75 million a month. If it doubled yoy, which is more plausible, then it was already $100 million/month.

          You have to figure that rose quite a bit further in October when they were getting record audiences (with the caveat that there are fewer games played than a regular season month). So $150 million seems like a low end but fairer estimate of what they likely made in October.

          1
          Reply
        • Steven Protomanni

          1 month ago

          All they said was north of $100 mil.. $150 or 200 seems plausible.. they get 100 percent of the viewership and ad revenue via radio,TV and in stadium

          Reply
    • bucsfan0004

      2 months ago

      The Jays hosted the most possible playoff games, and ticket revenue for home playoff games goes directly to the team.

      The list prices on playoff tickets everywhere were/are astronomical, even before hitting the secondary market. If the avg list price on a WS ticket was $1000 USD, multiply that by 44,000 x 4. Four LCS games too, probably $250-300 avg list price.

      1
      Reply
      • bullred

        1 month ago

        So thats 228 Mil Can or $164 Mil us

        Reply
  28. Floridacoach 2

    2 months ago

    As a Jays fan since 1977, and I have four adult sons that are all avid jays fans, and though we love Bo Bichette as a valuable contributor to our team, to try to balance that against turning down signing Kyle Tucker , that would be ludicrous. Bo has gained weight, cannot really run the bases, has to hit a double to get a single, and has seen too much time away due to injuries becoming an annual occurrence… The Jays’ window-of-opportunity to fight for a World Series, is NOW… Bo’s ego is bruised at losing his shortstop position, but having more errors than any other shortstop in the MLB is proof of his declining abilities, and it’s only getting worse. It’s time to make this divorce final… Tucker it is, because this is a BUSINESS, and absolutely not a guaranteed place of decline for Bo Bichette…

    3
    Reply
  29. holecamels35

    2 months ago

    Does anyone other than Toronto want to sign big time free agents? Something has to give if the Dodgers, Yankees and Mets can’t sign them all. Jays seem to be in in everyone.

    1
    Reply
    • This one belongs to the Reds

      2 months ago

      The nature of the screwed up system at this point has made this off-season a rude awakening for some guys. The aforementioned teams were complicit in making it so.

      1
      Reply
  30. Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

    2 months ago

    He has an opt out clause after 2027. So teams need to be wary of that.

    Reply
  31. fred-3

    2 months ago

    Tucker reminds me of someone like a JD Drew or Jason Bay. Good player, but not exciting. I would not give him $300 million.

    Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      2 months ago

      Tucker has already matched Bay’s entire career’s bWAR total. He’s more talented than both players.

      2
      Reply
  32. TheToasters

    2 months ago

    I think the Jays are just messing with the other teams, in terms of Tucker, but I could see them offering a Bergman like opt out package that might only offer short-term luxury tax hurt. I’m sure a lot of teams are willing to pay big for the next couple years.

    Reply
  33. Yanks4life22

    2 months ago

    Offer him opt-outs and see where it goes

    Reply
  34. Dumpster Divin Theo

    2 months ago

    Still pursuing him, haven’t they caught him yet? This is the slowest chase since Michael Palin’s Otto was chasing Kevin Kline with a steamroller in Fish Called Wanda

    3
    Reply
  35. Rsox

    2 months ago

    Hesitant to give Bichette a long term deal but ok with Tucker? Not getting the logic as both have fairly extensive injury histories

    Reply
    • BeenThereDoneIt

      2 months ago

      The problem with Bichette is other than the hit skill, his other skills are deteriorating. He still has 20-30 HR power and 40+ doubles. He used to steal bases and his high was 25 a few years ago but that has completely fallen off the map.

      Whereas Tucker still has all of the 5 tools at average to elite levels

      2
      Reply
  36. brucenewton

    2 months ago

    Bichette and Bellinger would cost about what Tucker wants.

    Reply
  37. friesTO

    2 months ago

    Tired of the wrong analysis concerning Nathan Lukas. The continued focus on letting go of Lukas is completely unnecessary as he played LF during the Mariners division series just fine and can play all OF positions.

    Loperfido (LF) is the one on the edge as he has no runway to play. A fine player just for depth on our bench but would be a better trade than Lukas who has been a clutch hitter on our way to the WS. Both are left hitting batters.

    Lukas is also a step up from Schneider in terms of WAR and BA so it seems odd to throw him under the bus when he’s doing so well and there are two players below his stats.

    I think it just comes down to writers not knowing the team well. Which would also explain how Kirk was robbed of a gold glove award

    1
    Reply
    • BeenThereDoneIt

      2 months ago

      Schneider can play both infield and outfield so he probably is the one they keep

      Reply
    • Paul Miller

      2 months ago

      I’m more tired of the wrong spelling of Lukes..:D

      2
      Reply
      • friesTO

        2 months ago

        whoops!

        1
        Reply
        • friesTO

          1 month ago

          To be fair his name is said as Lukas not Luke’s but that was my typo

          Reply
    • stormie

      2 months ago

      Lukes had slightly more WAR but also played twice as much. Schneider is a better hitter and mashed RHPs last year. He’s also younger and more versatile defensively.

      Reply
  38. friesTO

    2 months ago

    Bichette is slowing down, and I don’t mean during his injuries. He used to steal bases for about two years, but that has disappeared. The -13 OAA for second worst SS in the league is offset by his great at bats. The best thing he did for his cause in free agency was to play 2nd during the WS. This is really where he should go while the hitting and arm are still useful.

    I’m actually been warming up to Tucker signing instead of Bichette. Can still run and steal. While touted as RF can play all OF positions, been steady for a few years now and hopefully won’t break down the moment we sign him *cough* Santander *cough*. We like that a player has a main position but can also be a super utility player as the needs change. Really worked out for us with multiple players like that.

    Also it’ll signal to the upgraded AL East we’re going back to the WS.

    Depends where Bichette signs. I hope it’s the NL so we don’t have to face him for the AL East brawl

    Bichette is the sports car everyone loves but if you drive it too hard it breaks down a lot.
    Tucker also with some injuries but overall a dependable Volvo ready to go at a consistent level with occasional streaks of greatness. Also with access to our amazing hitting coach maybe that greatness gets even greater.

    Maybe I’m getting old but the Volvo is starting to look pretty good

    Reply
  39. billysbballz

    2 months ago

    I really think Tucker is waiting out Bellinger. If Bellinger is holding out for 6 years and say 150m then Rucker can turn around and look for 8 years at over 200m. Now if Tucker signs first and takes less years with opt outs that destroys Bellinger chance of getting a long term deal because even though Bellinger is more versatile, Tucker is a much better offensive threat and a year younger.

    Reply
    • rocky7

      2 months ago

      You may be right although there are several holes in your logic;
      Yes Belli is a year older than Tucker but Belli played 150+ games while
      Tucker was hurt and only played 78 games in 24 and 136 last season….. .is this a sign of things to come?
      Secondly, if a team pulls out the stops and offers Tucker 8 years and $$ 200 Million (his asking price) if I’m a GM I’m not giving him opt outs….he’d better be satisfied with the team, roster, life in that city…etc….opt outs is you give him what he’s asked for…..
      Finally, Belli, probably isn’t going to get 6/150….the Yankees have drawn a line hopefully either in max years, or max salary over the 6 years….if he finds a better deal….so be it…..the Stanton deal and the fact that he continually gets hurt every year as he grows older and can’t play the field any longer continues to plague the Yanks and limit their roster flexibility…..hopefully a lesson for Cashman…..

      Reply
      • bullred

        1 month ago

        I like opt outs. Your a star player and you played one incentified year for my team when you were younger and played balls to the walls. Let me sign all my players to opt out contracts.

        Reply
  40. statyllus

    2 months ago

    TOR would be hard pressed to sign Tucker even for a single season because as explained in the article the CBT (luxury tax) would make it an irrational financial decision that the Rogers corporate board would never approve.
    In addition to the CBT that would require the Jays to pay roughly double any AAV but then there’s the foreign exchange rate to manage. Blue Jay revenues are in Canadian dollars but they pay U.S. players in U.S. dollars – FX conversion rate would add another 38%-41% to any AAV. On top of that the Tucker Qualifying Offer (QO), loss of draft positions and loss of international pool dollars. Many front offices value these at another $10M-$15M (one time value). Just paying Tucker for a 1 year pillow deal would cost the Jays $100M+ in Canadian dollars

    Reply
    • FrozenRopes

      1 month ago

      You do know that Rogers is a global telecom company and holds many, many interests in the US, right? You know that, right?

      They are the second wealthiest set of owners in MLB and have no problem spending when the team is winning. They have been the most aggressive team this off season and I am almost certain his agent leaked the Mets number to get the most out of the Jays.

      Reply
  41. whyhayzee

    2 months ago

    Mrs. Tucker: “Honey, why are there so many birds in the front yard?”

    Reply
  42. FrozenRopes

    2 months ago

    Land Tucker and then trade Barger, Clement, Nimmala and picks for Marte. Then you win a world series or at least position yourself again for that serious run.

    Reply
    • friesTO

      2 months ago

      no way those players are still under team control

      Reply
    • BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

      1 month ago

      Resigning Bo costs no players and he should land around$25 mil a year….more ideal imo

      Now if he leaves and they sign Tucker, I would love Barger Okamato at 3rd, marte at 2nd, Tucker of, and The big Earn as a super utility guy to start the year (knowing that injrys can and do happen)

      I think nimmala and tiedemann would MORE than get Marte done. Arizona la is broke and Marte now has character issues.

      Imo Barrios would have to go to Arizona as part of the deal and would likely kill it in the dead state

      Reply
  43. friesTO

    2 months ago

    It’s a Spiderman Standoff where they all point at each other

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Bill Mazeroski Passes Away

    Pablo López To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Jordan Westburg Diagnosed With Partial UCL Tear

    Brewers, Pat Murphy Agree To New Contract

    Bruce Meyer Elected MLBPA Executive Director

    Spencer Schwellenbach, Hurston Waldrep To Undergo Elbow Surgery

    Tony Clark Steps Down As MLBPA Executive Director

    Padres, Walker Buehler Agree To Minor League Deal

    Padres Sign Germán Márquez

    Padres Sign Griffin Canning

    Pablo López Diagnosed With UCL Tear

    Brewers Sign Luis Rengifo

    Pirates Sign Marcell Ozuna

    Padres Sign A.J. Preller To Multi-Year Extension

    Diamondbacks Sign Zac Gallen

    Padres, Nick Castellanos Agree To Contract

    Brewers Sign Gary Sánchez

    Dodgers, Max Muncy Agree To Extension

    Orioles Sign Chris Bassitt

    Astros, Blue Jays Swap Jesús Sánchez For Joey Loperfido

    Recent

    Blue Jays Notes: Schneider, Varsho, Jimenez

    Freddie Freeman Hopes To Play Four More Seasons, Retire With Dodgers

    Joe Ryan Scratched From Start, Undergoing MRI

    Dodgers To Claim Jack Suwinski

    Finding A First Baseman In Colorado

    Cardinals Designate Zak Kent For Assignment

    Injury Notes: Simpson, Freeman, Junk, Pereira

    Bill Mazeroski Passes Away

    Rays’ Edwin Uceta Experiencing Shoulder Inflammation

    Cardinals To Sign Ramón Urías

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android iTunes Play Store

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version