The Yankees finalized their five-year, $162.5MM contract with Cody Bellinger last week. That would ordinarily come with a $32.5MM average annual value that counts against the team’s luxury tax ledger. In most cases, a contract’s luxury tax number is taken by dividing the number of guaranteed years from the overall amount of guaranteed money — regardless of the salary distribution. Unlocked performance bonuses or option decisions can subsequently change the calculation, but the AAV is the starting point.
However, as Joel Sherman of The New York Post reports, Bellinger’s deal falls into a rare exception built into the collective bargaining agreement: the “Valley Charge,” as it’s called in the CBA. That only comes into play with a contract that is front-loaded before a player option year or opt-out clause. That applies to the Bellinger contract, which allows him to opt out after the second or third seasons. The next few paragraphs will hopefully explain why that’s the case — though it requires diving into some math and technical terminology within the CBA. Interested readers will also want to check out this X thread courtesy of Ethan Hullihen.
Bellinger’s deal comes with a $20MM signing bonus, which is counted as guaranteed money and is paid in full regardless of whether he opts out.* The outfielder will collect $32.5MM salaries for the first two seasons. The deal comes with respective $25.8MM, $25.8MM and $25.9MM salaries for the final three years if Bellinger does not opt out. He’ll make $85MM over the first two seasons and will have his first opt-out decision with three years and $77.5MM remaining. For CBA purposes, all three years after the opt-out are treated as player option years because Bellinger decides whether to stick with the contract.
To understand the Valley Charge exception, we’ll need to bring over some language from the CBA. The provision applies when the base salary of a player option year “is less than 80% of the base salary … plus attributed signing bonus” of the cheapest year before the opt-out. It’s therefore not a direct comparison. The salaries of the option years range from $25.8MM – 25.9MM. The years before the opt-out include both their $32.5MM salaries and $10MM each year for the prorated signing bonus: a $42.5MM value in total. The value of all three option years are less than 80% of that $42.5MM ($34MM), so they all fall within the Valley Charge.
Once the Valley Charge is triggered, the contract’s luxury tax distribution changes. Turning back to the CBA: “For each such player option year, the difference between the player option year value and the (80% value) shall be allocated pro rata across the years preceding the (opt-out).”
So, we subtract the salaries of each of the option years from the $34MM 80% value of the second season. That comes out to $24.5MM ($8.2MM + $8.2MM + $8.1MM). That’s divided over the two seasons preceding the opt-out at $12.25MM annually and added to the $32.5MM initial value, bringing the new CBT number to $44.75MM. If Bellinger does not opt out, the Yankees will receive “credit” in 2028-30 for the overcharge in the first two seasons, meaning he’d only count against their CBT ledger for roughly $24.33MM annually over the final three years.
RosterResource now projects the Yankees for a tax number above $330MM in 2026. That’s above their $320MM season-ending mark from last year, so it’s not clear how much room ownership will allot for in-season maneuvers.
* The Post’s Jon Heyman reports that the bonus will be paid in $10MM installments on April 1 and August 1 of this year. A player receives his full signing bonus regardless of his opt-out decision. Bellinger’s bonus is up-front, so that’s largely immaterial here, but the date of the bonus payment doesn’t have any impact on the Valley Charge calculation.

They should make this reality for the Dodgers too.
You don’t think that the Dodgers pay Luxury Tax? Lol!
They do pay luxury tax, but make the tax hits even higher.
Who is going to push for an arbitrarily higher tax penalty for the dodgers? They’re being charged what was collectively bargained. Other owners wouldn’t want the league to be able to tax them outside what is in the cba. The players arguably lose in that situation and wouldn’t want it either. The commissioner works for the owners. No one wants that
Why ?
The Yankees are ruining baseball.
Too late. I have already ruined baseball.
I think it helps Friedman worked in private equity before baseball. Dodgers know all the tax tricks and loopholes.
Friedman doesn’t run the financial side of the Dodgers. That is handled by Senior Finance VP Eric Hernandez, reporting to CEO Stan Kasten.
NYY should get a pinball machine that works.
That’s a pretty high payroll, not sure if Cashman will make any more moves with free agents. Probably a trade for either Dominguez or Jones to get more relief help.
It would be a really bad business decision trading Jones or Dominguez for a reliever. My guess is if one is traded, it will be for a stud starter.
Jones is not getting you a stud starter. Maybe for Dominguez.
Don’t think either brings you a “stud” starter on their own, and I assume by stud you mean a 1 or 2 with upside.
WFAN callers disagree.
The Yankees will also throw in two game-used Derek Jeter jock straps (that haven’t been washed), the backup catcher from Single-A Tampa, and a case of Red Bull Total Zero. Plus, the other team gets the privilege of doing business with the New York Yankees!
Also, the other team will pay the full salary of stud they are sending to the Yankees.
Someone isn’t going to give you something for nothing.
Jones and Dominguez have little to no value.
Both have a ton of potential. You are mistaken.
Only Boone and some Yankee supporters think so.
Sorry but that’s just Yankee hate talking.
They have trade value, but for now have even more value to NY
Awwwwwwwwwwwww.
Hopefully Hal had a soft landing after he learned this and fainted.
Why does my head feel like it’s spinning?
Need a law degree to understand the contract stipulations and payroll calculations.
Great reporting though. Leave it to the exceptional mlbtr writers to describe the intricacies of such a complicated deal.
Perhaps a little arcane but something NY should know. Not like they don’t have contract lawyers. Makes me wonder about the strategy from the team’s perspective though.
The strategy was basically to sign the player, and that is what it took to get it done.
The Yankees spend a smaller portion of their gross revenues than most of the big spenders right now.
Probably all that salvia you smoked earlier.
You now may resume whatever you were doing before your head exploded.
Sounds pretty reasonable.
Well, duh, who didn’t know that!
Only a few of us idiots.
I think Jason Heyward’s CBT hit for the Cubs way back when worked liked Bellinger’s will since he could have opted out after three years, $78 million guarantee. Though, Heyward’s $20 million signing bonus was deferred until after the term expired. The Cubs are in the process of paying it now.
Paying luxury tax on $44.75M when his salary is essentially $42.5M.
Seems like the contract structure almost begs Belli to opt out. But in a system light on position player prospects not sure that strategy is optimal
I think owners will look for major changes in salary system at the next negotiation.
Should have deferred
According to this, Bellinger will cost the Yankees $98.75 million in 2026 and 2027 including the CBT fines.
That is interesting. The newest rule to my iteration of Dizzy Bat is any correct explanation of the Valley Charge per CBA Terms is an automatic win at any point of the game, with the caveat that you must keep spinning if that’s when you choose to explain it
Just dumb in general. I don’t like the system anyway, but this is nonsense–tand it’s even counterintuitive, because after this, teams will find more reasons to go squeeze and wiggle and play the system.