The offseason has more or less come to a close at this point. While a handful of players remain available in free agency and there’s always a chance of a surprise trade or two throughout Spring Training, the vast majority of the heavy lifting has been done. As Spring Training begins, it’s worth checking in on what teams around the league did this winter to see which club had the strongest offseason. A look at a few of the candidates:
Baltimore Orioles
After a disastrous 2025 season that saw the club fall to the basement of the American League, the Orioles have been very busy in their efforts to turn things around. A rotation that struggled to stay above water last year saw the return of Zach Eflin as well as the additions of both Shane Baz and Chris Bassitt. Those additions may not have included the front-of-the-rotation ace the Orioles were widely expected to pursue, but the club was aggressive elsewhere on the roster. Ryan Helsley was brought in to close while Felix Bautista is injured, and the club swung a deal for Taylor Ward to help round out their outfield. By far the biggest addition of the winter, however, was slugger Pete Alonso, who signed a five-year, $155MM contract. Alonso adds a legitimate 40-homer threat to the middle of a lineup that struggled to generate much offense outside of Gunnar Henderson last year and was heavily slanted toward lefty hitters.
Chicago Cubs
It’s rare that a team would be in this conversation after losing the offseason’s top-ranked free agent, but there’s a lot to like about the 2026 Cubs even after bidding farewell to Kyle Tucker. Alex Bregman, signed to a five-year, $175MM deal, can’t be expected to be the same offensive force as peak-level Tucker, but he makes up for that by helping to complete what’s arguably become the best defensive infield in baseball alongside Dansby Swanson, Nico Hoerner, and Michael Busch. The move pushes Matt Shaw into a utility role, where he can serve as protection against injury for the club while also potentially sharing time with fellow youngster Moises Ballesteros at DH. The addition of Bregman was complemented by the decision to swing a trade for high-upside righty Edward Cabrera in the rotation. That likely pushes swingman Colin Rea back into a bullpen that’s been rebuilt with Phil Maton, Hunter Harvey, and Hoby Milner after losing Brad Keller, Andrew Kittredge, and Drew Pomeranz back in November.
Los Angeles Dodgers
The Dodgers’ offseason hasn’t been an exceptionally busy one, but the few moves they wound up making could prove to be the most impactful of any team this winter. They kicked off their offseason by poaching star closer Edwin Diaz away from the Mets, but their biggest splash was the addition of Tucker to their outfield. Diaz and Tucker are both All-Stars with among the highest ceilings in the game at their respective positions. Adding both to an already star-studded roster, the Dodgers managed to address the 2025 team’s biggest weaknesses: a lackluster outfield and a leaky bullpen. They also extended Max Muncy on an affordable one-year deal and reunited with Kiké Hernandez and Evan Phillips. After back-to-back World Series championships, the Dodgers look even better headed into 2026 despite their relatively low volume of transactions.
New York Mets
While the Dodgers mostly kept their 2025 team intact for 2026 with just a few additions, the Mets went in the opposite direction with a complete roster overhaul. Out went Alonso, Diaz, Brandon Nimmo, and Jeff McNeil. Replacing them is a host of talent ranging from new staff ace Freddy Peralta to relievers Devin Williams and Luke Weaver on the pitching side, and a cluster of position players headlined by star infielder Bo Bichette. In addition to Bichette, who’ll move to third base alongside shortstop Francisco Lindor, the team brought in Marcus Semien to handle the keystone, Jorge Polanco to cover first base, and Luis Robert Jr. to work in center field. It’s a busy offseason that completely changed the look of the team that failed to make the playoffs last year, though it remains to be seen if this team will better support Lindor and Juan Soto in their pursuit of a World Series championship.
Toronto Blue Jays
The Blue Jays finished just shy of a World Series championship last year, and this winter they acted like a team that wanted to leave no stone unturned in their efforts to close the gap. A new-look rotation added Dylan Cease at the front and Cody Ponce at the back. A lineup that lost Bichette in free agency looked to make up for it by bringing in Kazuma Okamoto and Jesus Sanchez. Meanwhile, the team’s shaky bullpen upgraded from hard-throwing righty Seranthony Dominguez by bringing in ever-reliable soft-tosser Tyler Rogers. Missing out on both Bichette and Tucker takes some of the punch out of Toronto’s offseason, but adding Cease to a rotation that already includes Kevin Gausman, Shane Bieber, and Trey Yesavage should make the Jays significantly more threatening than they already were last year.
Other Options
Plenty of teams had offseasons worthy of praise aside from the five listed above. The Tigers managed to snag arguably the top pitcher available in lefty Framber Valdez on a short-term deal while also reuniting with future Hall of Famer and Detroit legend Justin Verlander, though failing to upgrade the lineup is surely disappointing for fans hoping to see the team make the most of Tarik Skubal’s likely last year in town.
The Red Sox were very busy this winter as they brought in Sonny Gray, Johan Oviedo, Willson Contreras, and Caleb Durbin via the trade market while signing Ranger Suarez and Isiah Kiner-Falefa in free agency, but the team’s failure to reunite with Bregman casts a shadow over their busy winter.
The Astros got the rotation depth they coveted, signing NPB star Tatsuya Imai to a three-year deal with multiple opt-outs and acquiring righty Mike Burrows in a three-team trade that sent outfielder Jacob Melton to the Rays. They’re still too right-handed and have a glut of infielders that could still lead to one more big spring trade.
The Pirates were very active by their usual standards, overhauling the lineup to bring in Ryan O’Hearn, Marcell Ozuna, and Brandon Lowe among others. The Rangers came into the winter without much room to add but managed to come away with a solid bat (Nimmo) for the lineup and a big arm (MacKenzie Gore) for the rotation nonetheless. The Mariners kept Josh Naylor and added Brendan Donovan to the infield. The A’s added only complementary pieces (McNeil, Aaron Civale) in terms of external additions but deserve praise for their franchise-altering extensions of Tyler Soderstrom and Jacob Wilson.
On the flipside, the rebuilding Cardinals managed to shed significant portions of the Contreras, Gray and Nolan Arenado contracts and pulled in a nice return from the Mariners (and Rays) in the three-team Donovan trade.
What team do MLBTR’s readers think had the best offseason this winter? Have your say in the poll below:

Rockford Peaches.
They lost Kit and Dottie at the end of the season. One of the best batteries in the game. Not easily replaced.
Yeah but remember they’re getting Marla Hooch back after her wild honeymoon.
We’ll see. Her singing career could blossom before then. Pipes as strong as her gap power.
For some reason I think that “All-the-Way” May could have a good singing career as well.
Sandlot – Or she could’ve done irreparable damage to her vocal cords on the honeymoon ending her singing career….
It’s times like this I’m reminded why I love this community, flaws and all.
I don’t understand.
Boy what a hitter
These comments are in a league of their own.
I guess I didn’t realize the movie was based on an actual real team, although all the characters in the film were fictional.
Easily the Padres I mean with all those minor league deals they made they’ve won the off-season for sure
My unbiased opinion is that the Tigers had the best offseason
Not a Tigers fan, and I agree with you.
They kept Skubal and added Valdez on a short term high-salary contract.
That two player swing might be the difference between the Tigers being the 8th best team to the 3rd best team.
Valdez you pray opts out because if not you have a very expensive paper weight. Good starter though. Verlander good value and good story. Doesn’t sniff my top 3 but they did alright.
Tigers and Dodgers added without subtracting. I would argue the Dodgers added more.
I voted Orioles because they may have improved the most.
As I’ve posted previously, Bregman not signing with Boston to me is a Sox positive given that I expect a decline due to aging and injuries. His leadership will be missed but Story will step up with other veterans.
Also, again the poll does not work in the app.
Red Sox not my top 3 but in running for 4. Gave up Harrison who is a potential difference maker. But ok got a great utility player and 2 more. IKF is a minor league deal for me and they gave him 6m. 21m for Gray and 2 pitchers instead of just signing someone or trading for a better younger starter. Oviedo for a depth piece is fine enough. Contreras great 1b like that. They spent $ and traded prospects. Added a lot. Just not the most efficient way.
Who exactly would this “better younger starter” be that they should have gotten instead of Gray?
Harrison Peralta Cabrera Priester Cease Ponce Valdez King.
Cease cost way too much; Peralta would have cost a lot more which I would not have done for a one year rental and King was always going back to the Padres to prove himself for a multi year deal. Valdez? Not for that money. Priester could end up being a one year wonder and why woukd the Brewers give him up now assuming they believe in him? You can throw out names but the reality is, Breslow seemed to do extremely well and is adjusting nicely as the GM after the Sales trade. I just read an article indicating the deal for Marte died because the Snakes were insisting on Mayer in addition to either Early or Tolle as part of the deal. Thus, if believed, it was Breslow who walked away. I’m not saying Boston had the best off season (getting Alonso in my view was required but the quick move to Suarez could end up being the better move. I prefer him over Bregman.
On this we agree 100%
Red Sox improved SP, defense, maintained payroll flexibility, added much-needed catching depth in their system, and didn’t give up their best prospects to do it. I’m willing to wager that Contreras and Durbin will out-produce Bregman and the collection of misfits at 1st base last year, and the defense will become at least league average. Contreras might out-produce Bregman straight up this year, playing in Fenway in games that matter. We’ll see if Breslow can add the RH power bat and move Yoshida…when the demand for pitching increases via injuries.
I agree Red Sox improved but in an inefficient way.
So the Reds don’t even get mentioned?
They don’t warrant a mention
They and the pirates improved more than the cubs did.
I’d rather retain Imanaga, trade for Edward Cabrera, and sign Bregman than…. (Checks notes)…. umm Suarez and JJ Bleday?
What are you smoking
All I remember is Schwarber was just to sell tickets. We aren’t spending. Then they added a 200 plus strike out dh who doesn’t walk. Should hit some bombs playing in that park. It’s something but not best off season material.
Agree with you as to the Pirates. Along with the Tigers, I like the Pirates offseason the best.
Check your notes again. You lost every bit of the hitter you gained. Reds aced the bullpen market, cubbies got a few leftovers. cubbies had to get starting pitching, they didn’t have any!
Pirates did a lot this year!
I agree that the Cubs didn’t add enough hitting, and may have lost it when they traded Cassie.
But they did upgrade their rotation, just not that much. I don’t think the Cubs did enough but they also had the least to do in the Central. Projections are really bullish on PCA and I think he’s great but I think he’s more second half 2025 than first half 2025 going forward.
I mean, neither did the Phillies, who honestly did more. Outside of Suarez, the Reds didn’t really do anything of note. The Phillies were the talk of baseball at the start of the offseason, anyway.
perhaps because the Reds already have the best starting pitching in the division….didn’t need to address it at all.
You’re baiting me aren’t you?
They have a great rotation. As do the Pirates. We’ll see who ends up with the best at the end of the season.
That Suarez signing might be the best buy of the year.
This is true. A steal. Not as impactful but still a great add for the price was Tauchman to the Mets. Can’t believe he didn’t get an MLB deal.
I think the biggest overpay this year will be Polanco (besides Tucker because who can ever live up to that contract). He won’t be bad by any means but I can’t see him giving $20M worth of value to the Mets.
Colorado Rockies: Moneyball 2.0 Optionality 1.0, Complete revamp up and down the organization and Front Office will lay groundwork for no longer being an insular org. Players? The best is yet to come.
My goat, glad to see you’re over here to (AB303 on the row)
It’s amazing how productive doing nothing can be.
If the Braves get a decent SP, I’d give them an “A” for the offseason. Right now, it feels like a “B.”
Lol
They never signed a decent SP and that was their top priority. If they don’t stay competitive, AA is fired this season.
Omni
I agree with your first sentence and disagree with your second sentence.
While they can’t be considered on the same level as these teams, I was happy with the moves the white Sox made.
To be honest before Kim slipped on the ice and the pitching injuries even before the first spring training game I would have honestly thought that the braves had the best off season. But I can’t say that now.
When a team has no concern for money and sign top offensive FA and best closer available (even after signing best closer in prior year) — there is no competition who had the best off season.. While already rostering at least 5-8 all-stars and potential HOFs
let the question be who had second best
The other teams are just hanging out at the Dodger’s feet, hoping the rich, fat kid drops some crumbs for the rest of us.
Diaz seemed good value. Tucker not so much.
Would been more impressed if they traded for Roberts or signed Refsyder. Something lil creative sneaky.
Value isn’t as important when money has no meaning. They added a significant amount of WAR/talent and they paid up for it.
I voted Dodgers
I think the Red Sox were second
The team with 2 needs and went and paid top dollar to fill their 2 needs. LAD…
O’s or BoSox in second.
PIT and CIN have made some good moves too.
OD can’t get here soon enough!
Baltimore gave Alonso biggest pile of $. I’d rather get ohearn for 2 years thats cheaper than 1 Alonso. Baz trade was expensive. Cabrera Peralta Burrows Oviedo Harrison much better bang for the buck. Might be forgetting someone. Could have just signed someone. But they did a lot. Improved a lot. Just not that top 3 level. Mets did a ton and other than Bichette efficiently.
I agree Mets did a lot, more efficiently. I don’t know if that means they improved more. I guess it would be nice to separate those concepts. Who improved most efficiently vs who improved the most.
Improved Most:
1.Dodgers
2.Orioles
3.Pirates
4.Red Sox
5.Mets
Most Efficient:
1.Mets
2.Tigers
3.Pirates
4.Red Sox
5.Reds
Braves. See starting staff…..
Cleveland Spiders
In terms of improving their future outlook there is only one answer to this question: The Colorado Rockies.
Mets
Pirates
Jays
Yankees
I’m a friggin’ Mets fan but the Dodgers are coming off back-to-back WS titles, retained their own free agents they wanted, and then also added the best reliever in baseball (arguably, and certainly the top of this class), and the prize free agent hitter on the market who was a top ten offensive player in terms of OPS+ last year (per Baseball Reference) at one of the few positions they weren’t already getting elite offensive production from.
Of course the answer is the Dodgers and screw ’em.
If you consider from a standpoint of where a team was in 2025 spring training vs 2026 spring training, then the Mariners win, hands down.
The Dodgers? Hahahaha.
Major League Baseball continues to be a joke.
Sorry the Pirates are a joke. Go watch another sport so you can feel better.
Nationals are jumping ahead of the curve, Toboni knows what economic system is approaching and is building the farm up to adapt for a floor/cap environment. We’ve regressed into ludicrous contracts for players that don’t warrant them, and will see a Moneyball 2.0 sooner than later.
Look out for the Angels this year, seriously
We’ll look for them in the basement.
I think over all the Cubs did far more than expected and that is a huge win.
Bregman was brought in to help mold the core and to add in O. If you go weighing Tucker vs Bregman on production alone then yes That impact is hard to replace. But Tucker brought nothing else to the Cubs. D was sub par. Injured for long stretches and after a hot start did not impact the team late season. Not a vocal leader.
So for a vet team like LAD that is fine. He will never be worth what they are paying him. No one is that guy. I would rather have a Leader type like Rizzo that players will gravitate towards making the whole better
Out side of that Jed did a great job with the pen. He will never blow up the bank on pen arms but what he paid for was a solid group.
Cabrera if healthy was the best starter on the market. That will be the question. He could have a ace level break out or a season ender. Over all a worthy gamble with Steele pitching in Spring. They could afford that gamble
So I think that pound for pound it is hard to argue against what Jed did. The moves were solid business minded moves with Bregman a signing that broke Tom’s stingy ways.
Peralta is pretty great. Burrows has 6 years of control. Gore Harrison lefties. Cabrera is good. In conversation for best sure. Unanimous best though I dunno.
Tucker Bregman wash. Every contending team boost the bullpen and most more than cubs did. So you traded for Peralta. That’s it.
I find it hilarious people consider the Mets a “good” offseason when you have an 83-win team with unlimited financial resources that basically treaded water.
They lost Alonso, Diaz, Nimmo, McNeill, Marte, Mullens, Helsley, Acuna, and 3 major prospects, including MLB-ready talent.
They added Bichette, Semien, Peralta, Robert, and Williams.
Those are some good additions. But those are MAJOR losses, from a team that barely hit .500. They could’ve used the Bichette money to sign Alonso AND Bregman. Given their finances their offseason was an unmitigated disaster.
cbps
“Given their finances their offseason was an unmitigated disaster.”
STRONG disagree.
FanGraphs has the Mets as the #3 team in baseball
PECOTA has them as the #6 team
cbps
the only thing that matters are projections
i pretend to be smart because i am not
beep beep boop boop
Semien > Nimmo so gain. Bichette >>> than McNeill. Roberts >>> Marte Mullens. Williams slight downgrade from Diaz.
3 major prospects? For some teams sure. Not the Mets. They have better. And when you can spend 300 million non elite prospects are to be used for trades. When you can trade for Peraltas sign Bichettes Sotos what do you need above average ceiling prospects for other than trading. Peralta Roberts trades just cost the Mets some spare extra parts they just had laying around.
33 + 28 = 42? thats a new type of math? especially when short of bichette falling off a cliff is a 1 year deal vs 5 years each?
Alonso and Diaz were big losses no doubt but Nimmo and McNeil (whom i both loved and wished we could keep) were more role players at this stage. I think the Nimmo for Simien trade was a mistake as you still havent really replaced him and curtailed Baty (mcneil replacement) a bit, but the rest of the MLB players were bench fodder. Helsley was absolute garbage for the mets and basically cost em all momentum when he pitched, Pretty much every outing he was charged with a run or let an inherited run score. Marte, mullens, acuna had no real impact if anything had negative value. The top prospects that went out got you the ace you needed in Peralta.
Also you forgot they added Polanco along with Weaver and Meyers which the latter should help solidify the bullpen. I still want a big thumper bat for right field but overall solid/good offseason.
Sounds like a whiny Phillies fan to me
Dodgers did the best, but Boston improved their starting pitching significantly. If Durbin & Mayer contribute offensively the Sox are in good shape.
Cue folks with names like “VolpeJizzGuzzler” and “Bohmssphincter” to throw in a vote for NYM having the worst offseason
Cleveland wasted no money on overpriced over the hill washed up or never were never will be players.
They also didn’t spend any $ on non washed up still productive players
Brewers….The pitching depth they all ready have/are building should finally get them a WS, probably not this year, maybe not next, but probably in the 3-5 year range with the position prospects coming in the next year/two
They do have the best farm in baseball now. That by no means translates to the major league team. So no.
what does it take to win the offseason? what teams in history have won the most offseasons? Perhaps not published not in Fangraphs but the Journal of Correlated Nonsense? Does a GM have an OPS, Offseason Performance Status? Suppose a team doesn’t make splashy moves, but just needs to fine tune their roster, and does so smartly? Do they get a good grade even though they did almost nothing? What about a team that makes the splashiest noteworthy signings, but also has splashy departures that outweigh the gains? Do they get a bad grade (OPS)?
I think you can have catagories to this. LAD spent the most but when you add 70M in two players and don’t get a huge seasonal win addition then win the series again then it is 70M wasted. They had that anyways. Why spend 70M and not improve.
So it is in the eye of the beholder. Some will say we spent the most. Others will say we added the most wins over last year and did not over pay for them. and another team will say our future is secure with the new talent.
None are wrong. well spending 70M and not improving is pretty stupid
I don’t think the pirates brought in the most accomplished talent of all teams but they have definitely upgraded their roster the best
Exactly. Pirates brought in a bunch of slightly above average guys and given what they had that moves the meter quite a bit, maybe ten more wins.
Compared to say the Dodgers who have the best team and got two studs, but probably makes them only had a dozen games better.
Biased as a Mariners fan, but I think both the Mariners and Dodgers did well at addressing needs (though I would have liked to have seen the Mariners grab another bat, I am fine with rolling with the youth to start the season). Pirates also improved a dismal lineup quite a bit.
Poll isn’t working. At least not for me.
No white sox?
Depends on how you define “strongest.” The Orioles probably win the “most improved” trophy, but they’re still a postseason long shot. Of the teams that missed the postseason last year and are giving themselves a better chance this year, it’s the Mets. They win the “most likely to succeed” award.
Brewers strengthened starting pitching with Sproat, Harrison, and Drohan in and Freddy and Tobias out. Loss of Durbin offset by Rengifo although Durbin will be great in Boston!! Should be able to repeat best record in baseball!!
lol. keep dreaming. Brewers only care about beating the Cubs and mail it in after.
CFS
Mailed-in troll attempt
not really. Crew tanked past the Dodgers and beat the Cubs when they we down to two play off callaber arms and Tucker and PCA were adding nothing.
The Troll was posting a L after squeezing by then getting man handled by the Dodgers who did not sweep the Phills and had to battle the Jays
The Crew was a breeze for them.
So trolling? Or stating facts?
If anything the Crew were hot air
I have undying loyalty so I voted for the Mets, but cmon. The dodgers added Tucker and Diaz to a 2x WS winning team, it was obviously them, but I won’t vote it in a poll! That’ll show em!