Headlines

  • Chad Green To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Orioles Promote Adley Rutschman
  • Mariners Sign Justin Upton
  • Luis Gil To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Carter Kieboom To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Cardinals To Promote Nolan Gorman, Matthew Liberatore; Tyler O’Neill To IL
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • Top 50 Free Agents
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2022
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Arbitration Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Top 11 Picks Will Be Protected In 2015 Draft

By Steve Adams | July 21, 2014 at 1:50pm CDT

The Astros’ failure to sign Brady Aiken resulted in the team receiving a compensation pick (No. 2 overall) in the 2015 draft, and while we’ve seen problems caused by comp picks in the Top 10 under the new CBA (specifically heading into the 2013 season), MLBTR’s Tim Dierkes reports that a change has been made to the protected pick structuring (Twitter links). Previously, the CBA had called for the “Top 10” picks to be protected, but changes have been made that will protect the picks of the teams with the 10 worst records, regardless of whether or not comp picks are inserted into the first 10 selections.

This very situation may have cost the Mets a chance to sign Michael Bourn in the 2012-13 offseason (an outcome that, in hindsight, may have been beneficial to New York). The Mets finished the 2012 campaign with the 10th-worst record in baseball, but their No. 10 pick was pushed back to No. 11 due to the Pirates’ inability to reach agreement with 2012’s No. 8 overall pick — Mark Appel (who was drafted 1-1 by Houston the following season).

The Mets were weighing an appeal to the commissioner’s office that would have allowed them to sign Bourn and surrender a second-round pick, as Bourn had turned down a qualifying offer from the Braves and was subsequently linked to draft pick compensation. Before any resolution of the matter could ever be hammered out, the Indians made a four-year, $48MM offer that Bourn accepted. It’s not clear if that scenario prompted the change, but it’s logical to speculate that the Bourn situation could have sparked the change.

Coincidentally, the Mets currently have the 10th-worst record in baseball once again, though obviously that’s subject to change over the final two-plus months of the season. However, regardless of which team ends up having their pick pushed back from No. 10 to No. 11 to accommodate the Astros’ new selection, that pick will remain protected. That team, therefore, would only have to surrender a second-round pick in  order to sign a free agent that turns down a qualifying offer.

This will mark the second consecutive year that the Top 11 picks are protected in the draft, although the reasoning behind the protection of this year’s No. 11 pick was different. The Blue Jays received the No. 11 pick as compensation for failing to sign 2013 No. 10 overall pick Phil Bickford, and compensation picks, by definition, are protected under the CBA.

Share 3 Retweet 34 Send via email5

2015 Amateur Draft Newsstand

Phillies Outright Koyie Hill, Designate Tony Gwynn Jr.
Main
Blue Jays Designate Sergio Santos For Assignment
View Comments (26)

Comments

  1. Karkat

    8 years ago

    Wow, I remember all the arguing about the Mets situation a couple years back. I guess THIS is actually the way the majority of the teams had interpreted the protected picks rule after all.

    Reply
    • HobokenMetsFan

      8 years ago

      I’m not surprised at all by it. Why should the Mets have been penalized that offseason for signing Bourn when they did indeed finish with a top 10 worst record? (Not that I especially wanted Bourn). It’s not the Mets’ fault the Pirates couldn’t sign their pick the year before.

      Reply
      • Karkat

        8 years ago

        My argument at the time was that everyone signed an agreement that said “the top 10 picks are protected” and not “the picks of the 10 worst teams from the previous year are protected.” The Mets didn’t really have a case given what was honestly pretty cut-and-dry wording.

        That said, I think this is a fairer and more sensible way of doing things, and is likely how a decent chunk of the CBA signees probably envisioned things.

        Reply
        • HobokenMetsFan

          8 years ago

          Fair point on the literal semantics, I think the Mets’ stance was more about the “spirit of the rule” which seems to be “10 worst records.” However, I do agree that this is a fairer and more sensible interpretation.

        • East Coast Bias

          8 years ago

          Most people, including myself, were not arguing over what the rule was… as that’s pretty black and white, but more so over what it SHOULD be. The system was broken. Everyone on our side wanted the system to change so the Mets can save their first round pick, not show them any preferential treatment for this one time case.

  2. WhoKilledTheRallyMonkey

    8 years ago

    How is the slot value system effected, do the #3-11 slots now have the same value as slots #2-10 would have without the Astros comp pick?

    Reply
  3. Revery

    8 years ago

    Good. Unintended consequences should be corrected when possible.

    Reply
  4. MB923

    8 years ago

    If Astros finish with worst record, they get number 1 AND number 2?

    Reply
    • WhoKilledTheRallyMonkey

      8 years ago

      Well the Astros did miss out on 3 picks this year, including the #1 overall, to get one extra first round pick next year. Seems fair to me.

      Reply
      • MB923

        8 years ago

        Oh I’m not saying it’s unfair. It’s just crazy.

        Reply
    • East Coast Bias

      8 years ago

      Good point. That’s crazy!

      Reply
  5. bomok

    8 years ago

    But since it’s the “worst record”. if the Astro’s were to sign someone this offseason, would they lose the #2 pick? Because thay wouldn’t have gotten THAT one from their record last year.
    Or if they are the 11th worst team this year, and the sign a FA with a QO do they lose the #2 pick?

    Reply
    • WhoKilledTheRallyMonkey

      8 years ago

      To answer your fist questions: “changes have been made that will protect the picks of the teams with the 10 worst records”

      Picks not pick…..all the astros first rounds picks will be protected in the have one of the 10 worst records.

      To answer your second questions: good question.

      Reply
      • East Coast Bias

        8 years ago

        The number 2 pick is protected regardless of where they draft next year. If they are to lose a pick, it will not be their 2nd overall. @bomok:disqus

        Reply
        • WhoKilledTheRallyMonkey

          8 years ago

          Under the old system I know that how it would work but how do you know it works that way now?

          “Previously, the CBA had called for the “Top 10″ picks to be protected, but changes have been made that will protect the picks of the teams with the 10 worst records, regardless of whether or not comp picks are inserted into the first 10 selections”

          According to that statement, which is from this article and not the CBA, only the picks of the teams with the 10 worst records regardless of their position in the draft are protected. If you have a link to a relevant section of the new CBA I would appreciate it.

        • Steve Adams

          8 years ago

          The No. 2 pick they received as compensation is protected, as the title and the final paragraph of the post outline. Comp picks are protected, as are the top (natural) picks of the 10 worst teams.

    • East Coast Bias

      8 years ago

      If they’re the 11th worst team, they will draft 2nd and 12th. If they sign a free agent with draft pick compensation attached, they will lose the 12th pick, since it is not protected as the top 11 are.

      If they are the 10th worst team, they will draft 2nd and 11th, and thus will not lose any first round picks to draft pick compensation in the event they sign a free agent with a QO attached.

      Reply
  6. Sufferfortribe

    8 years ago

    This very situation may have cost the Mets a chance to sign Michael Bourn in the 2012-13 offseason (an outcome that, in hindsight, may have been beneficial to New York)……………and very UNbeneficial to Indians fans.

    Reply
    • chicothekid

      8 years ago

      One of these days, FA prices are gonna start dropping BECAUSE so many of them keep going bust. Right?

      Reply
      • Sufferfortribe

        8 years ago

        I don’t know, but I would have to guess no. I think there will always be teams desperate enough to throw too much money at a player, in the hope that they’ll be the guy to bring a ring to their team. I guess I’m old-school. I believe in developing your own players. That’s why more should be spent on scouting and development. And as an Indians fan, this is pretty much the reality that we live with.

        Reply
  7. Mike1L

    8 years ago

    Is it wrong to hope that the Astros make an incredible stretch run and finish with a better than 11th worst record? They end up the season with six games against the Rangers and Mets, both of whom might be competing for one of those ten slots. I know no team ever makes it a strategy to be bad and collect top picks, of course.

    Reply
    • Matt Mosher

      8 years ago

      The Astros have tanked for three seasons running.

      Reply
  8. Matt Mosher

    8 years ago

    How about this? You don’t sign a pick… That’s it. No extra pick the next year. No doubt that that helped Houston decide to reduce their offer to Aiken.

    Reply
    • Tko11

      8 years ago

      Why would you give all the leverage to the player?

      Reply
      • Mike1L

        8 years ago

        There’s a middle ground here. The teams already have leverage, because, as we can see with Aiken and Nix, if they go to college they can’t sign for three years unless the accept the team’s offer. A team that doesn’t sign a first rounder shouldn’t be handed a nearly equal pick the next year. Let them have pick in the first round, but put it in the middle of the stack. Plenty of talent there.

        Reply
        • Tko11

          8 years ago

          But they would be inclined to give the player the money he wants or else they may end up drafting in the middle of the pack in a weaker draft (in your scenario). The whole Aiken thing is a weird situation but if he really does have some sort of injury then I don’t blame the Astros for not giving him the money he wanted. Thats just from my understanding of that situation, I will admit I have not been following it all that closely.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Chad Green To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Orioles Promote Adley Rutschman

    Mariners Sign Justin Upton

    Luis Gil To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Carter Kieboom To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Cardinals To Promote Nolan Gorman, Matthew Liberatore; Tyler O’Neill To IL

    Max Scherzer Likely Out Six To Eight Weeks Due To Oblique Strain

    Chris Paddack Undergoes Tommy John Surgery

    Brandon Lowe Diagnosed With Stress Reaction, Shut Down For At Least Three Weeks

    DeGrom MRI Reveals “Continued Healing”; Still No Clear Timetable For Return

    Boras: Michael Conforto Not Ruling Out Late-Season Return

    Mariners Option Jarred Kelenic, Claim Adrian Sampson

    Kumar Rocker Signs With Frontier League’s Tri-City ValleyCats

    Dodgers Place Clayton Kershaw On Injured List

    Bryce Harper Has Tear In UCL, Won’t Throw For Four Weeks

    Recent

    Giants Place Brandon Belt On 10-Day Injured List

    Padres Place Mike Clevinger On IL With Triceps Strain

    A’s Reinstate Cole Irvin

    Yankees Place Joey Gallo, Kyle Higashioka On COVID IL

    White Sox Reinstate Aaron Bummer

    Chad Green To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Rays Select Dusten Knight, Place Andrew Kittredge On IL

    Mariners Designate Steven Souza Jr., Select Sam Haggerty

    Cubs Select P.J. Higgins, Designate Ildemaro Vargas

    Twins Reinstate Trevor Larnach, Place Cody Stashak On IL

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Trevor Story Rumors
    • Frankie Montas Rumors
    • Michael Conforto Rumors
    • Arbitration Tracker
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • MLB Player Chats
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Top 50 Free Agents
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2022
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version